Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability Model June 2011.
-
Author
marvin-laurence-flowers -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Embed Size (px)
Transcript of Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability Model June 2011.

Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability Model
June 2011

Participants will understand Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability Model.

The Kentucky Board of Education approved regulation 703 KAR 5:200 on April 13, 2011
The regulation is still under review and has not been finalized yet.
Minor changes could occur between now and then based on recommendations from these groups

Next-Generation Learners
Next-Generation
Instructional Programs and
Support
Next-Generation
Professionals
Next-Generation
Schools/Districts
(reporting mechanism)
Achievement (Proficiency)
Gap
Growth
Readiness for College/Career
Graduation Rate
Program Reviews
Working Conditions Survey
Percent Effective Teachers
Percent Effective Leaders
Revised Report Card
New Accountability System


Elementary and Middle Schools Reading, writing and math based on new Kentucky Core
Standards Grade 3 will have multiple choice and short answer only (new) Grades 4-8 will have MC, short answer, and open/extended
response Science and social studies continue with existing Kentucky Core
Content until new standards are released Nationally norm-referenced section embedded in
the test for reading, math, science and social studies Nationally norm-referenced portion is Stanford On-Demand format will use prompts Editing and mechanics may have MC and short answer Vendor is Pearson

High School End-of-course – English II, Algebra II,
Biology, and US History Not grade-specific; to be taken when a
student completes a course May be used for a percentage of a
student’s final grade in that course (20% is KDE recommendation)
Test will be linked to enrollment in a course procedures about withdrawal dates
are currently being developed Vendor is ACT Quality Core On-Demand format will use prompts Editing and mechanics will come from
PLAN (multiple choice)

Beginning in 2011-2012 . . . Last 14 instructional days of the
district’s calendar Maximum of 5 days testing, with the
other days to be used for make-up testing
NOTE: EOCs will occur at various times throughout the school year

Stop and review your notes, jot down more thoughts, and ask questions

Next- Generation Learners

Achievement = proficiency Achievement for elementary and
middle schools is based on performance on the reading, math, science, social studies and on-demand writing tests
Achievement for high school is based on performance on the end-of-course exams and the on-demand writing test

For each content area . . . 1 point awarded for each % scoring proficient or
distinguished 0.5 points awarded for each % scoring apprentice 0 points awarded for noviceBonusAdditional 0.5 awarded for each % distinguished
combined with -0.5 for each % noviceBonus points awarded in the amount that
distinguished offsets novice(NOTE: No points will be taken away if novice
offsets distinguished).

Gap = distance of the gap group from the goal of 100% proficiency
Gap calculation for elementary and middle schools is based on performance on the reading, math, science, social studies and on-demand writing tests
Gap calculation for high school is based on performance on the end-of-course exams and the on-demand writing test

The Student Gap Group is an aggregate count of the following student groups:
Ethnicity/race (Af. Am., Hisp., Nat. Am.) Special education Poverty (free/reduced lunch) Limited English Proficiency

Non-duplicated counts of students in the gap student groups who score proficient or higher are summed.
This yields a single gap number of proficient or higher students with no student counting more than one time.
For each subject area, the % of students scoring proficient or distinguished in the Non-duplicated Gap Group is reported.

Student 1: Donatello – AA, FR, (proficient)
Student 2: Ricky – W, FR, and Spec. Ed. Student 3: Enrique – LEP, FR Student 4: Michelle – FR Student 5: Marco – LEP, FR, and Spec.
Ed


The achievement of all individual groups will still be disaggregated and reported as they always have been, however . . .
Gap reporting for accountability purposes will include only the % of student in the combined non-duplicated Gap Group scoring at proficient and distinguished level.

Stop and review your notes, jot down more thoughts, and ask questions

Growth = comparison of an individual student’s score from one year to the next; uses a Student Growth Percentile based on actual growth of student’s similar academic peers
Growth for elementary and middle schools is based on performance on the reading and math tests
Growth for high schools is based on PLAN to ACT in reading and math

Growth comparisons are made to similar performing “academic peers.”
Low, typical and high growth scales will be determined based on actual student performance state-wide.
These are equal-interval, percentile-based scales.
Based on model currently used by Massachusetts Department of Education

For reading and math . . . 1 point for each % of students
showing typical or high growth 0 points for low growth

College/Career Readiness = number of graduates successfully meeting an indicator of readiness
Readiness for middle schools is based on performance on EXPLORE test
Readiness for high schools is based on ACT, college placement tests and career measures

Stop and review your notes, jot down more thoughts, and ask questions

Middle Schools% of students meeting the ACT-established
benchmarks for EXPLORE in reading, English and math is averaged to generate an overall readiness percentage
EXPLORE BenchmarksReading – 15English – 13Math – 17

High Schools% of graduating seniors who meet at least one
of the following readiness indicators:1. Meets all of the ACT benchmarks (Reading: 20,
English: 18, Math: 19), OR2. Passes a college placement test (COMPASS,
KYOTE), OR3. Receives an industry-recognized career
certificate (other possible measures forthcoming)

Graduation Rate = % of students graduating
Average Freshman Graduation Rate (AFGR) is current transitional reporting model
Federally-mandated Graduation Cohort Model goes into effect in three years

Grade Range
Achievement
(Proficiency)
Gap Growth
College/ Career
Readiness
Graduation
Rate
Total
Elementary
30 30 40 N/A N/A 100
Middle 28 28 28 16 N/A 100
High 20 20 20 20 20 100

Next-Generation Learners
System to classify schools and districts

Stop and review your notes, jot down more thoughts, and ask questions
