Keeping the Academic Library Relevant in the Digital Age · 2011. 11. 7. · frontier town •...
Transcript of Keeping the Academic Library Relevant in the Digital Age · 2011. 11. 7. · frontier town •...
10/27/2011
1
University Library System University Library System
Keeping the Academic Library
Relevant in the Digital Age
University Library System
Rush G. Miller, Ph.D.Hillman University Librarian and Director, [email protected]
University Library System University Library System
The University of Pittsburgh
10/27/2011
2
University Library System University Library System
History
• Founded in 1787 when Pittsburgh was a
frontier town
• Private university until 1966, when it became
“state related”
• Now a major, comprehensive research
university
University Library System University Library System
Characteristics of the University
• 35,000 students, one-third are graduate
students
• 3,800 faculty
• $800 million in federal research grants
during the past year; in top 10 in science
and medicine grants
• 15 schools and colleges
• 5 campuses
10/27/2011
3
University Library System University Library System
Cathedral of Learning is tallest
academic building in North
America
Nationality Classrooms
University Library System University Library System
City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
• 2.4 million metro
area
• Former steel
center, now
major education,
research and
service center
10/27/2011
4
University Library System University Library System
The Libraries
• 6.2 million books, including
700,000 ebooks
• 87,000 journals
• $36 million budget
• 375 staff
• Rank in top 25 research
libraries in N. America
• 18 separate library facilities
• Off site storage capacity of 3
million volumes
Hillman Library, Pitt’s largest Library contains 2 million volumes including 1.2 million in non-English language collections such as East Asian, Slavic, and Latin American
University Library System University Library System
Pitt Digital Library
• Rank 11th in North America in digital library
measures
• More than 700 licensed databases
• More than 110 separate digitization projects
• Major investments in infrastructure and digital
publishing support
10/27/2011
5
University Library System University Library System
University Library System University Library System
10/27/2011
6
University Library System University Library System
Good Ole’ Days
The “Heart” of the University
University Library System University Library System
Challenges facing today’s academic
libraries:
• Use of traditional library collections and
services decreasing
• Alternative sources of information growing in
use by our students and faculty
• Already declared irrelevant by many of our
users
10/27/2011
7
University Library System University Library System
High Density
Storage
University Library System University Library System
we know that
libraries must
change, but we do
not know how to
make this
transition”
““““
10/27/2011
8
University Library System University Library System
Not incremental change. . .
University Library System University Library System
buttransformative!
10/27/2011
9
University Library System University Library System
Beginnings of real change at Pitt in
1996 with reengineering
University Library System University Library System
Tech Services: After
10/27/2011
10
University Library System University Library System
Closing Departmental Libraries
University Library System University Library System
Changing the Focus of
Reference Services
10/27/2011
11
University Library System University Library System
ULS as PublisherAuthor Self-Archiving Repositories
University Library System University Library System
Current E-Journals
10/27/2011
12
University Library System University Library System
DRL Collections: 106
Total items in DRL: 1,207,737
University Library System University Library System
Tsukioka KōgyoThe Art of Noh, 1869-1927
10/27/2011
13
University Library System University Library System
Tsukioka KōgyoThe Art of Noh, 1869-1927
University Library System University Library System
Results of early
changes
• More efficiency in operations
• Savings allowed reallocation of
resources to new initiatives and
technology infrastructure
• New Office of Scholarly
Communications and Publishing =
publish 25 online journals in
addition to disciplinary and
institutional repositories
10/27/2011
14
University Library System University Library System
Current Change Process Underway
• Redesign of collections and services to align
them better with user behavior and new
realities facing the libraries
University Library System University Library System
Themes of the ULS Library Strategic Framework
(Long Range Plan)
Overarching Theme: User-Centered Collections and Services
LONG RANGE GOALS OBJECTIVES
Information resources
and collections
• Understand user needs, expectations
Deliver innovation (enhance access)
Stewardship of collections (conservation, preservation)
Infrastructure(space, equipment, systems)
• User-centered renovation of space, equipment, systems
• Closer integration within and across ULS with faculty and departments
Services
• Develop a new service model for reference blending traditional and
digital formats
• Innovate information literacy instruction and assessment
• Innovate access services
Scholarly communication
• Articulate and exemplify new models of scholarly communication
• Partner with faculty and researchers at and beyond Pitt
• Support creation of new digital collections, publishing services, trusted
repositories
Organizational agility
• Increase effectiveness by directing resources to highest priorities (as
indicated by assessment data analysis)
• Monitor and respond quickly to needs
• New skills development
• Recruit and retain professional staff
10/27/2011
15
University Library System University Library System
Farnese Atlas Image by Lalupa CC BY SA
Atlas’ Burden
University Library System University Library System
Median Circulation and Reference Transactions in North
American Research Libraries 1991-2008, with 5 Year Forecast
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
Circulation
Reference Transactions
線形 (Circulation)
線形 (Reference
Transactions)
Data source: ARL Statistics 2007-2008 http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/arlstat08.pdf
“65% of information
requests originate
off-campus.”
University of Minnesota
Discoverability report, p. 4
10/27/2011
16
University Library System University Library System
Circ declining faster at Pitt
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
450000
500000
550000
Pitt Circ
ARL Median Circ
Percent change
since 2001
Pitt 28%
ARL median 18%
University Library System University Library System
Reference declining faster at Pitt
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
Pitt RefARL Median Ref
At Pitt, virtual reference is not
voluminous enough to materially
impact this downward trend.
(2008: 11,003 virtual reference
transactions against a total of 134,523)
Percent change
since 2001
Pitt 52%
ARL median 47%
10/27/2011
17
University Library System University Library System
Percentage Change in Median Resources Per Student at ARL
Libraries, 2000-2008 (Compared to 2000)
-0.035
-0.03
-0.025
-0.02
-0.015
-0.01
-0.005
0
0.005
Staff
MonographsPurchased
Volumes Added
Change in Staff, Volumes Added, Monographs Purchased Per Student
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
2.00
EserialsExpenditures
Change in E-Serials ExpendituresPer Student
Data source: ARL Statistics 2007-2008
http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/arlstat08.pdf
In 2008, Pitt expended
66% of its materials
budget on e-resources.
The ARL median was 57%.
University Library System University Library System
What Did Users Say
They Want? (2002)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
All of thetime/most of
the time
Some of thetime
None of thetime
Perc
ent
Responses
Do you use electronic sources all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, or none of
the time?
Faculty/Graduate
Undergrad
http://www.clir.org/PUBS/reports/pub110/contents.html
• Faculty and students do more
work and study away from campus
• Loyal to the library, but library is
only one element in complex
information structure
• Print still important, but almost
half of undergraduates say they
rely exclusively or almost
exclusively on electronic materials
• Seamless linking from one
information object to another is
expected
• Fast forward to 2011: these
trends many times stronger!
10/27/2011
18
University Library System University Library System
http://www.oclc.org/us/en/reports
/onlinecatalogs/default.htm
End-Users want
online catalogs:
#1: to link directly to online content
(and they want linking to be easy)
“The end user’s experience of the
delivery of wanted items is as important,
if not more important, than his or her
discovery experience.”—page 11.
ONLINE CATALOGS:
WHAT USERS AND LIBRARIANS WANT
University Library System University Library System
October 2010
http://www.oclc.org/research/publications/library/2010/2010-11.pdf
“Special collections and archives
are increasingly seen as elements
of distinction that serve to
differentiate an academic or
research library from its peers …
however, much rare and unique material remains undiscoverable, and monetary resources are shrinking at the same time that user demand is growing.”
—Executive summary
10/27/2011
19
University Library System University Library System
MEANWHILE …
… the traditional collections continue to dominate how library staff spend
their time
By UlleskelfCC-BY-NC-ND 2.0http://www.flickr.com/photos/ulleskelf/349312876/
University Library System University Library System
Micah Toll
•Pitt Senior, School of
Engineering
•Finalist, College
Entrepreneur of the Year
WHAT TO DO?
STUDY PEOPLE
• “Much research focuses on information sources (e.g., books or newspapers) and systems (e.g., catalogs) rather than on the needs, motivations and behavior of information users.
• In other words, much research has emphasized information objects and systems over people.”
• –Online catalogs, p. 10
10/27/2011
20
University Library System University Library System
And Then There’s Today’s (and
Tomorrow’s) Student
• Tech-savvy
• Nimble
• Enthusiastic
• Achievement-oriented
• “We’re special”
How does Micah Toll
get his information
and ideas?
By: acroamatic
http://www.flickr.com/photos/acroamatic/387565075/
University Library System University Library System
The Larger Context:
Knowledge Management
Knowledge communities “interpret information about the
environment in order to construct meaning … create new
knowledge by converting and combining the expertise and know-
how of their members …[and] analyze information in order to
select and commit to appropriate courses of action.”
—Chun Wei Choo,
Professor of Information Studies, University of Toronto
The Knowing Organization: How Organizations Use Information to Construct Meaning, Create Knowledge, and Make Decisions (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), xii.
10/27/2011
21
University Library System University Library System
Knowledge Pyramid
DOMAINEXPERTS:
Professors, grad.students, researchers, deans,university leaders and staff
UNIVERSITY COMMUNITIES
OFPRACTICEINFORMATION
EXPERTS:Librarians, records
managers, archivists,others
IT EXPERTS:Desktop, computer lab and server support;
applications for academic, research, administrative
support; networks,telecommunications, security
Adapted from Choo, Information Management for the Intelligent Organization, 238.
University Library System University Library System
Knowledge Creation and Information
Network Processes
“Improving efficiency and effectiveness in knowledge-intensive
work demands more than sophisticated technologies—it requires
attending to the often idiosyncratic ways that people seek out
knowledge, learn from and solve problems with other people.”
—Rob Cross,
University of Virginia
Rob Cross et al., “Knowing what we know” Organizational Dynamics 30, no. 2 (November 2001), 101.
10/27/2011
22
University Library System University Library System
Implications for Research Libraries
• Students and faculty engage in information network
processes with or without libraries.
• Libraries have the opportunity to engage more proactively
with teachers and learners.
• Librarians have natural partnerships with subject domain
and IT experts.
• Libraries and librarians need to better understand how
communities of practice learn, teach, and turn
“information” into new knowledge, insight, and action.
University Library System University Library System
A NEW KIND OF
LIBRARY
Build a vision of a new kind of library
Be more involved with research and learning materials and systems
Be more engaged with campus communities
Make library collections, services, and librarians more visible in university communities of practice
Move to next generation systems and services
The library in the community
10/27/2011
23
University Library System University Library System
The Concepts of Service Introduction,
Growth, Maturity, and Decline
USE
University Library System University Library System
A Blueprint for Change: Innovation, Engagement, Assessment,
and Annual Life Cycle Management
Manage,Engage,
Collaborate
Evaluate and Plan
Design and Develop
Implement and
Introduce
Distribute and Promote
Build orenhance
andvalidate (test)
Ongoingassessment
Ongoing outreach and
communications
Exit this service
Innovate, renew, ormaintain this service
10/27/2011
24
University Library System University Library System
Proforma FY12 Roadmap (overlapping activities not shown)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Environmental scan
• Repeat Don King study
• Repeat user satisfaction study
• Personas study
• Current awareness
Establish public services design principles
• Create and share a vision (zero based)
• Create and share a roadmap of needed new services
• Recommend principles for space redesign
Conduct existing services assessment
• Identify existing services for enhancement/renewal
• Identify services to maintain
• Identify services to exit
• Second phase of input for space redesign
Renew public services organization
• Skills analysis
• Training programs
• Implement collaboration tools
• Job descriptions and assignments
Single set of
recommendations
packaged for
internal and external
communications
Articulated vision &
proposed strategic
initiatives for
FY12 and FY13
Measurable objectives
and timelinesfor FY12-FY13
By July 1 2012,
phase 1 of
reorganization
complete
University Library System University Library System
Committing to a shared planning,
design and implementation
process
10/27/2011
25
University Library System University Library System
“It’s not the changes that do you in,
it’s the transitions” –William Bridges
Change = something in the external environment changes (e.g., a new library director is hired; a new system is being introduced;a reorganization occurs; new procedures or policies are planned)
Transition = an internal reorientation process to a change
The three phases of transition
It is critical to manage transitionsinclusively by engaging staff inthe process.
Bridges, William. 1991. Managing transitions: making the most of change. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
University Library System University Library System
What We Were: The Well
• The Library as a center of collections
• The Library as a center of experts and tools to guide
users to appropriate resources
“They come and go and drawfrom the well”
10/27/2011
26
University Library System University Library System
What We Need to Be:
The River
University Library System University Library System
Endings
What we call the beginning is often the end
And to make an end is to make a beginning
The end is where we start from
--T.S. Eliot