K.Ducatel – 15/10/2004 e Europe 2005 in an EU of 25.

K.Ducatel – 15/10/2004

eEurope 2005 in an EU of 25eEurope 2005 in an EU of 25

Ducatel- 15 October .2004

eEurope on the Road to LisboneEurope on the Road to Lisbon

2000 2002 2003 2005 2010

eeEurope 2002 Europe 2002 Action PlanAction Plan

eeEurope+ 2003 Europe+ 2003 Action PlanAction Plan

eeEurope 2005 Europe 2005 Action PlanAction Plan

Mid-term Mid-term review ofreview of

LisbonLisbon

2004

Aim: get Europe on-line

Aim: Accession & Candidate Countries on-line

Aim: e-services on secure BB infrastructure

Lisbon Agenda to 2010

Where we are now


eEurope 2005Mid-term revieweEurope 2005

Mid-term review

Main MessagesMain Messages

• eEurope objectives still valideEurope objectives still valid

• Accession countries will sign up to the Accession countries will sign up to the 2005 AP targets2005 AP targets

• Benchmarking and exchange of good Benchmarking and exchange of good practices are effective but more could practices are effective but more could be donebe done

• Implementation is not uniform – some Implementation is not uniform – some countries and application areas countries and application areas lagging behindlagging behind



Mid-term review

Main Messages (2)Main Messages (2)

•Areas with strong political consensus and support Areas with strong political consensus and support to new initiatives are moving ahead to new initiatives are moving ahead

•Broadband Broadband doubled last year to 19.5m connectionsdoubled last year to 19.5m connections

•Government services on-line Government services on-line up from 17% in 2001 to 43% in 2003up from 17% in 2001 to 43% in 2003

•Areas with good progress on the ground and good Areas with good progress on the ground and good market developments but needing more political market developments but needing more political support: eLearning, eHealth, securitysupport: eLearning, eHealth, security

•New areas where political support is needed: New areas where political support is needed: multi-platform access, interoperability, IPRsmulti-platform access, interoperability, IPRs


CEE10 Survey(Dec 2003)

CEE10 Survey(Dec 2003)

• Internet AccessInternet Access

• ““Why I don’t use the net”Why I don’t use the net”

• ““How I use the net”How I use the net”

• Internet in schoolsInternet in schools

• Internet in firmsInternet in firms

• Leadership profiles…Leadership profiles…


Internet penetration in households (2003)

Internet penetration in households (2003)

Sources: Eurostat and eEurope+ survey

NMS & CC Avg

Internet penetration by household 2003(giving averages for EU 11 and the New Member States and Candidate Countries)

(Data from Eurostat and eEurope+ 2003 surveys)

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%

DK UK DE MT FI SI

LU EU CZ AT IE IT EE ES PT

NMS/C

C EL SK LV PL BG LT HU RO


Internet accessInternet access• Only three CEE10 countries have more than 15% Only three CEE10 countries have more than 15%

of households with Internet access. of households with Internet access.

• Bulgaria, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, and Bulgaria, Hungary, Lithuania, Latvia, and Romania all report household Internet access Romania all report household Internet access levels at 10% or lower. levels at 10% or lower.

• Slovenia lies just behind the average value for Slovenia lies just behind the average value for the EU 15 household Internet access levels the EU 15 household Internet access levels

• Levels of household Internet access are Levels of household Internet access are currently stagnating currently stagnating

• One third of households with computers do not One third of households with computers do not have an Internet connection.have an Internet connection.

• The dominant platform for access is the PC and The dominant platform for access is the PC and for some CEE 10, the cost of a PC is a major for some CEE 10, the cost of a PC is a major inhibitor for household Internet accessinhibitor for household Internet access


Why I don’t use the Internet:four top reasons

Why I don’t use the Internet:four top reasons

• ““I don’t want the Internet”I don’t want the Internet”

• ““I don’t know how to use a I don’t know how to use a computer”computer”

• “…“…no access device at home”no access device at home”

• ““computers are too expensive” computers are too expensive”


What do I use internet for?What do I use internet for?

• General information searches - 76% (but General information searches - 76% (but on-line ordering is low <4%)on-line ordering is low <4%)

• E-mailing – 71%E-mailing – 71%

• Reading on-line newspapersReading on-line newspapers

• Games and musicGames and music

• Web TV/radio (11%) (EE 44%/ LV 41%)Web TV/radio (11%) (EE 44%/ LV 41%)

• Internet banking -12% (80% in Estonia)Internet banking -12% (80% in Estonia)

• Online travel and accommodation (20%)Online travel and accommodation (20%)


Broadband subscriptions/ 100 pop

Broadband subscriptions/ 100 pop

Source CoCom – Jan 04

EU 15 Avg

NMS & CC Avg

EU Broadband penetration rate, 1 July 2004

0.2 0.4 0.5

1.4 1.5 1.7

2.5 2.6 2.7

3.8

5.5 5.7

6.4 6.6 6.7 6.7

7.4 7.6 7.7 7.88.3

9.3

11.0

12.0

14.7

12.4

14.4

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

EL SK PL CY LV IE LT HU CZ SI PT LU ES DE MT EU25 UK EE EU15 IT FR AT FI BE SE DK NL

Bro

adb

and

lin

es p

er 1

00 p

op

ula

tio

n


Internet in schoolsInternet in schools

Number of Computers per 100 pupils in secondary education connected to the Internet

3.2

3.5

3.0

10

.7

3.0 3

.6

5.8

1.5

1.4

2.5

3.6

9.3

1.4 1.02

.1

7.6

4.0

9.6

0

5

10

15

BG CZ EE HU LT LV PL RO SI SK CEE 10AVG

EU15AVG

Nu

mb

er

of

Co

mp

ute

rs

Secondary Level (2001)

Secondary Level (2003)Source: eEurope+ Benchmarking Survey, June 2003

2A2 2


Internet connectivity of firms

Internet connectivity of firms

Percentage of enterprises having access to the internet41

%

91%

77%

55%

68%

64%

82%

39%

93%

85%

71%

47%

93%

73%

71%

41%

62%

84%

94%

80%

74%

85%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

BG CZ EE HU LT LV PL RO SI SK CEE 10AVG

EU15AVG

June 2003 Dec 2003 All enterprises = 100%Source: eEurope+ Benchmarking (Enterprise Survey)

3A6


New Member State Leadership profilesNew Member State Leadership profiles

• Slovenia leads on infrastructure and individualsSlovenia leads on infrastructure and individuals

• Access by individuals/household

• Enterprises connectivity and take-up

• e-learning,

• Estonia leads on broadband and sericesEstonia leads on broadband and serices

• broadband access individuals and firms

• regular individual Internet use,

• security precautions

• online financial activities

• On-line ‘public’ services (e-health and e-government)

• Czech Republic leads on e-businessCzech Republic leads on e-business

• digital literacy at work

• e-commerce people and firms

• enterprises security

• Hungary – Internet in schools and health clinics Hungary – Internet in schools and health clinics

• Romania – internet in secondary schoolsRomania – internet in secondary schools

• Poland - ICT at work and in firmsPoland - ICT at work and in firms

K.Ducatel – 15/10/2004

eEurope: the new agendaeEurope: the new agenda



Mid-term review

Main MessagesMain Messages

• eEurope objectives still valideEurope objectives still valid

• Accession countries will sign up to the Accession countries will sign up to the 2005 AP targets2005 AP targets

• Benchmarking and exchange of good Benchmarking and exchange of good practices are effective but more could practices are effective but more could be donebe done

• Implementation is not uniform – some Implementation is not uniform – some countries and application areas countries and application areas lagging behindlagging behind



Mid-term review

Main Messages (2)Main Messages (2)

•Areas with strong political consensus and support Areas with strong political consensus and support to new initiatives are moving ahead to new initiatives are moving ahead

•Broadband Broadband doubled last year to 19.5m connectionsdoubled last year to 19.5m connections

•Government services on-line Government services on-line up from 17% in 2001 to 43% in 2003up from 17% in 2001 to 43% in 2003

•Areas with good progress on the ground and good Areas with good progress on the ground and good market developments but needing more political market developments but needing more political support: eLearning, eHealth, securitysupport: eLearning, eHealth, security

•New areas where political support is needed: New areas where political support is needed: multi-platform access, interoperability, IPRsmulti-platform access, interoperability, IPRs


eEurope 2005 - SummaryeEurope 2005 - Summary• Strong points of eEuropeStrong points of eEurope

• Captured the policy agenda

• Was widely emulated (e.g. eNorway, eJapan, eEurope+, etc)

• Timely – peak of Internet boom

• Cost effective – high leverage effect

• Effective mobilisation of OMC

• Lessons for the futureLessons for the future

• More emphasis on strategic level

• Fewer & more coherent set of actions

• More attention to demand-side, services & content

• The right timescale is important (balance of short and mid-term horizon)


eEurope – Contribution to Mid-term review of Lisbon eEurope – Contribution to Mid-term review of Lisbon

• eEurope as part of the Lisbon’s strategy : eEurope as part of the Lisbon’s strategy : goalsgoals

• Modernise the European economy

• Build a knowledge-based economy

• Improve employment and social cohesion by 2010

• Impact of eEurope on Lisbon Agenda• Role in accelerating Broadband adoption• ICT contribution to productivity and growth• Role in Job creation and skills• Cohesion: e-inclusion/ digital divide• Contribution of ICT to innovation & the 3% ‘Barcelona targets’ • Sustainability

• Contribution to the KOK Report


Beyond eEurope 2005: Timetable

Beyond eEurope 2005: Timetable

• Now - Review of eEurope –successes and lessons

Connectivity is up e-Gov = ‘open gov’ - services going on-line Co-ordination delivers - eEurope Advisory Group Benchmarking – monitoring progress is essential

• Inputs to the themes for the future

• PWC study (August)• Dutch presidency seminar (September)• eEurope Advisory group reflection (October)• Council

• Timetable for a new policy instrument

• Broad outline (end 2004)• Concrete proposal (mid 2005)• Preparation (end 2005)• Launch 2006


Beyond eEurope : next stepsBeyond eEurope : next steps

• Draft Communication : relevant issuesDraft Communication : relevant issues

•Contribution of ICT to the Lisbon goals:• IS a boost to citizenship• ICT central to boost productivity and improve

competitiveness

•Issues for IS policy beyond 2005 :• eInclusion and citizenship• Content and services• Skills for the knowledge society• Interoperability• ICT – a motor of economic development• Security and consumer confidence

K.Ducatel – 15/10/2004 e Europe 2005 in an EU of 25.

Documents

Transcript of K.Ducatel – 15/10/2004 e Europe 2005 in an EU of 25.