Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s...

236

Transcript of Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s...

Page 1: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center
Page 2: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center
Page 3: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational

Model for Energy Planning

Final Report

Submitted by: Center for Study of Science, Technology and Policy (CSTEP)

For the Energy Department,

Funded by the Planning Department, Government of Karnataka

August, 2018

Page 4: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Center for Study of Science, Technology and Policy (CSTEP) is a private, not-for-profit (Section 25) Research

Corporation registered in 2005.

Designing and Editing by CSTEP

Disclaimer

While every effort has been made for the correctness of data/information used in this report, neither the authors

nor CSTEP accepts any legal liability for the accuracy or inferences for the material contained in this report and

for any consequences arising from the use of this material.

© 2018 Center for Study of Science, Technology and Policy (CSTEP)

For private circulation only.

August, 2018

Center for Study of Science, Technology and Policy

#18, 10th Cross, Mayura Street,

Papanna Layout, Nagashettyhalli, RMV II Stage,

Bangalore-560094 Karnataka, INDIA

Tel.: +91 (80) 6690-2500

Fax: +91 (80) 2351-4269

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.cstep.in

Page 5: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Shri Ravikumar P., Additional Chief

Secretary, Government of Karnataka for his continued support and encouragement for

conducting this study. We are grateful to Shri Govindaraju K., Additional Director, Technical

Monitoring, Energy Department, Government of Karnataka for his overall support and

coordination of the project. The financial support of the Government of Karnataka for this

study is gratefully acknowledged.

The support and data provided by Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited

(KPTCL), State Load Dispatch Centre (SLDC), Karnataka Renewable Energy Development

Limited (KREDL) and Power Corporation of Karnataka Limited (PCKL) were critical for the

success of the study. In particular, we would like to thank Shri K.V. Shivakumar, Director

(Transmission), Shri Raghavendra, Superintending Engineer (Elec.), Shri

Hanumantharayappa, Chief Engineer (Electy.) and Smt. Gayathri H. B., Ex-Superintending

Engineer (Elec.) from KPTCL for their invaluable support for executing the project. We would

also like to thank Shri Chetan D., Executive Engineer (Elec.); Smt. Divya Prabha H., Assistant

Executive Engineer; and Smt. Meetha C. Jadav, Assistant Engineer from KPTCL for their

continuous guidance and prompt clarifications during the project.

We would like to thank Shri Manjunath M. T., Chief Engineer (Electy.) of SLDC for his kind

support in executing the project. This project would not have been possible without the active

cooperation of Shri Chandrashekar, Executive Engineer (Elec.) and Shri Madhu B. P., Assistant

Executive Engineer from SLDC. We also acknowledge the data provided by Shri T. Maruti

(Assistant General Manager, KREDL), Shri A. Selvaraj (Assistant General Manager, KREDL),

Shri Bharatheesh Rao (Joint Director – Projects, PCKL) and Shri Pradeep (Assistant Director

– Projects, PCKL) without which this project could not have proceeded.

The report benefitted from inputs provided at various stages by colleagues at CSTEP. We are

grateful to Dr Anshu Bharadwaj, Executive Director for his continued support and

encouragement. We sincerely thank Mr Sumanth Shankar Rao, Advisor and Dr S. S. Krishnan,

Advisor, for sharing their valuable technical feedback and insights during the course of the

study. We are immensely thankful to Dr Jai Asundi, Research Coordinator, and Dr Gaurav

Kapoor, Principal Research Scientist. We also thank Merlin Francis, Devaditya Bhattacharya,

Abhinav Misra and Aswathy Shivaji for providing editorial support and graphics inputs.

Page 6: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center
Page 7: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Executive Summary

The Government of India has ambitious targets of achieving 175 GW of renewable energy by

2022. Karnataka had a renewable capacity share of around 35% out of 20 GW of the installed

generation capacity mix, as of March 2017. This is further expected to increase as the state

(KREDL) aims to have 6.86 GW of solar and 4.9 GW of wind generation capacity by FY19.

Increasing our renewable generation capacity is necessary, considering various policy targets

driven India’s Nationally Determined Contributions. However, the intermittent nature of solar

and wind raises fundamental technical challenges for the power system. Thus, careful planning

of the transmission network is critical for efficiently enabling high level of renewable energy

penetration.

This study looks into the impact of planned renewable energy addition, up to FY 2018-19, on

the Karnataka grid. Detailed power flow analyses were conducted for each of the financial

years 2017-18 and 2018-19. The analyses were conducted for six different scenarios, for these

two years, in order to capture the variation in solar and wind generation, and the state’s total

demand. Solar generation plants are predominantly concentrated in Tumakuru, Chitradurga,

Bidar, Ballari, and Raichur districts, while wind generation plants are concentrated in

Vijayapura, Gadag, Chitradurga, Davanagere and Belagavi.

The study also looked into the effect that taluk-level limits on RE capacity had on the grid.

Such limits for solar (200 MW) are already in place, while they are still being planned for wind

(100 MW) and solar-wind hybrids (100 MW). For the purposes of this study, a total of 15 taluks

were selected, five each for solar, wind and solar-wind hybrid capacity, to test the effect of

these limits.

Key takeaways from this study include:

The additions projected for FY 2018-19 are likely to overload 18 transmission lines and

3 substations. In order to avoid this, network strengthening is recommended. Setting up

of a new transmission line from Bidadi to Vrushabhavati substation, strengthening of

NRS – Peenya corridor and upgradation of Dambal substation are some measures that

can be taken towards network augmentation.

It was found that in two out of five selected taluks, increasing solar capacity to 200 MW

resulted in network overloading. In contrast, all the selected taluks were able to

successfully integrate 100 MW of wind. Increasing solar-wind hybrid plant capacity to

Page 8: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

100 MW per taluk also did not cause network overloading in any of the chosen taluks.

A detailed analysis is required to arrive at technically feasible limits on renewable

capacity addition at the taluk-level.

An illustrative investment analysis was conducted based on a comprehensive

assessment of the different scenario results. The study suggests upgradation of a total

of 21 network elements at a cost of around INR 645 crore.

A Geographical Information System (GIS) enabled, web-based energy planning

platform has been developed to visualise power flow scenarios. The visualisation

platform allows users to better understand the impact of high renewable energy capacity

deployment in Karnataka.

A thorough network analysis in Bangalore Metropolitan Area Network (BMAN) area

should be undertaken in order to plan network strengthening for future load growth.

Page 9: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Abbreviations and Acronyms

Abbreviation Expansion

AC Alternating Current

API Application Programming Interface

BMAN Bangalore Metropolitan Area Network

CEA Central Electricity Authority

CGS Central Generating Station

CAGR Compounded Annual Growth Rate

D/C Double Circuit

DPR Detailed Project Report

EPP Energy Planning Platform

ESCOM Electricity Supply Company

ETAP Electrical Transient Analyser Program

FY Financial Year

GIS Geographical Information System

GoK Government of Karnataka

GT Generator Transformer

GW Gigawatt

HVDC High Voltage Direct Current

ICT Interconnecting Transformer

JNNSM Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission

KEA Karnataka Evaluation Authority

KERC Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission

KPCL Karnataka Power Corporation Limited

KPTCL Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited

KREDL Karnataka Renewable Energy Development Limited

kV kilo Volt

kVA kilo Volt Ampere

LGBR Load Generation Balance Report

LILO Loop In Loop Out

LDPH Linganamakki Dam Power House

MGHE Mahatma Gandhi Hydro-Electric station

MW Megawatt

MVA Mega Volt Ampere

NCEP Non-Conventional Energy Plants

PCKL Power Corporation of Karnataka Limited

PGCIL Power Grid Corporation of India

PHES Pumped Hydro-Electric Storage

PPA Power Purchase Agreement

PV Photovoltaic

RE Renewable Energy

RPO Renewable Purchase Obligation

S/C Single Circuit

SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition

SLDC State Load Dispatch Centre

SRLDC Southern Regional Load Dispatch Centre

var Volt-Ampere reactive

XLPE Cross-linked Polyethylene

Page 10: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center
Page 11: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Contents

1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 1

2. Log Frame/Theory of Change/Programme Theory ............................................................................ 2

3. Progress Review ................................................................................................................................................. 4

4. Problem Statement ............................................................................................................................................ 9

5. Scope, Objectives and Evaluation Questions .......................................................................................... 9

6. Evaluation Design ........................................................................................................................................... 11

7. Evaluation Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 13

8. Data Collection and Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 19

9. Findings and Discussion ............................................................................................................................... 27

10. Recommendations ..................................................................................................................................... 43

11. Reflection and Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 49

12. References ..................................................................................................................................................... 50

Annexure I – Existing Network ........................................................................................................................... 53

Annexure II – Base Case Network Validation with SCADA Flows ...................................................... 173

Annexure III – Proposed Network ................................................................................................................... 181

Annexure IV – CGS Share Allocation and Transmission System Asset Cost Data ........................ 218

Page 12: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

List of Figures

Figure 1: Karnataka's fuel-wise installed capacity (MW) ................................................................................ 4

Figure 2 : RE growth in the state from FY12 to FY17 ........................................................................................ 7

Figure 3: Source-wise RE Installed Capacity Mix in FY17 (MW) .................................................................. 8

Figure 4: KPTCL transmission loss (%) from FY12 to FY17 (Source: Data obtained from KERC

Tariff Orders) ..................................................................................................................................................................... 9

Figure 5: Karnataka transmission map (Source: CSTEP Analysis, data from KPTCL) ...................... 10

Figure 6: Evaluation Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 13

Figure 7: RE plants in Karnataka as on March 31, 2018 ............................................................................... 23

Figure 8: Snapshot of ETAP model of Karnataka network in 2017-18 ................................................... 24

Figure 9: Power flow in Shantigrama 400kV substation .............................................................................. 27

Figure 10: ETAP One-line view of overloaded line .......................................................................................... 33

Figure 11: CSTEP Karnataka EPP – Visualisation of generation units..................................................... 37

Figure 12: CSTEP Karnataka EPP – Static network elements ..................................................................... 38

Figure 13: CSTEP Karnataka EPP – Scenario analysis .................................................................................... 38

Page 13: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

List of Tables

Table 1: Log Frame .......................................................................................................................................................... 3

Table 2: Voltage bus limits ......................................................................................................................................... 12

Table 3: Data Matrix ..................................................................................................................................................... 20

Table 4: Scenario dates chosen ................................................................................................................................ 25

Table 5: KPTCL load generation balance report (May 5, 2017, 10:09AM) ............................................ 26

Table 6: Load generation balance for FY 2017-18 (MW) .............................................................................. 28

Table 7: Power flow study results for FY 2017-18 .......................................................................................... 31

Table 8: Load generation balance for FY 2018-19 (MW) .............................................................................. 34

Table 9: Power flow study results for FY 2018-19 .......................................................................................... 36

Table 10: Taluk-wise solar limit feasibility ........................................................................................................ 40

Table 11: Taluk-wise wind limit feasibility ........................................................................................................ 41

Table 12: Taluk-wise solar-wind hybrid limit feasibility .............................................................................. 42

Table 13: Network elements to be strengthened ............................................................................................. 45

Table 14: Illustrative cost analysis: Upgrading transmission lines for 2018-19 ................................ 48

Table 15: Illustrative cost analysis: Upgrading substations for 2018-19 .............................................. 48

Table 16: Details of conventional generations as on March 31, 2017 ..................................................... 53

Table 17: Details of solar generation as on March 31, 2017 ....................................................................... 55

Table 18: Details of wind generation as on March 31, 2017 ....................................................................... 61

Table 19: Details of KPTCL substation as on March 31, 2017................................................................... 107

Table 20: Details of transmission lines in Karnataka as on March 31, 2017 ...................................... 139

Table 21: Details of installed reactors in KPTCL grid as on March 31, 2017 ...................................... 171

Table 22: Transmission line parameters considered in this study ......................................................... 172

Table 23: ETAP Transmission line power flow comparison with SCADA snapshot ........................ 173

Table 24: ETAP bus voltage comparison with SCADA snapshot .............................................................. 180

Table 25: Details of proposed conventional generations for FY 18 and FY 19 .................................. 181

Table 26: Details of proposed solar generations for FY 18 and FY 19 .................................................. 182

Table 27: Details of proposed wind generations for FY 18 and FY 19 .................................................. 194

Table 28: Details of proposed mini hydro generations for FY 18 and FY 19 ...................................... 195

Table 29: Details of proposed Co-generations for FY 18 and FY 19 ....................................................... 199

Table 30: Details of proposed biomass generations for FY 18 and FY 19 ............................................ 203

Table 31: Details of proposed KPTCL substations for FY 18 ..................................................................... 205

Table 32: Details of proposed KPTCL substations for FY 19 ..................................................................... 207

Table 33: Details of proposed KPTCL transmission lines for FY 18 ....................................................... 209

Table 34: Details of proposed KPTCL transmission lines for FY 19 ....................................................... 211

Table 35: Details of proposed KPTCL transformer augmentations for FY 18 and FY 19 .............. 213

Page 14: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Table 36: Details of proposed PGCIL substation for FY 18 ........................................................................ 216

Table 37: Details of proposed PGCIL transmission lines for FY 18 ........................................................ 216

Table 38: Details of proposed PGCIL substation for FY 19 ........................................................................ 217

Table 39: Details of proposed PGCIL transmission lines for FY 19 ........................................................ 217

Table 40: Details of proposed reactors in KPTCL grid for FY 18 and FY 19 ....................................... 218

Table 41: Details of CGS share allocation for Karnataka ............................................................................. 218

Table 42: Transmission system asset cost data considered in this study............................................ 219

Page 15: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 1

1. Introduction

Renewable Energy (RE) is a crucial component of the future energy mix, as a pathway for

energy access and energy security. The Government of India has announced an ambitious target

of 175 GW of RE by 2022. The targets announced include 100 GW of solar and 60 GW of

wind.

RE sources will contribute significantly to Karnataka’s energy mix. As of March 2017,

Karnataka’s installed capacity mix consisted of the following components: thermal (8,680

MW), hydro (3,629 MW), nuclear (880 MW) and renewable (7,278 MW) (Central Electricity

Authority, 2017). RE generators thus constitute nearly 35% of the installed capacity mix today.

In addition, the state plans to bring the solar installed capacity to 6.86 GW and wind installed

capacity to 4.9 GW by the end of FY 2019.

While rising penetration levels of RE is necessary, the intermittent nature of RE means that

grid integration is a crucial challenge for the state. High level of RE penetration requires careful

planning.

In this context, the Center for Study of Science, Technology and Policy (CSTEP) has

undertaken this study to analyse the transmission network’s ability to absorb RE at the end of

FY 2019, through power systems power flow studies.

Since RE resources are geographically dispersed, mapping of RE sites and analysis of

availability of evacuation transmission infrastructure is crucial towards integrating RE into the

grid. The core objective of this study is to develop a Geographical Information System (GIS)

enabled, web-based computational model, which can assist the state in planning for a high RE

transition. Such an analysis will help policy makers make informed decisions with regard to

planning of transmission infrastructure.

Key state agencies involved in planning, managing and operating the transmission

infrastructure are: the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL), State

Load Despatch Centre (SLDC), Karnataka Renewable Energy Development Limited (KREDL)

and Power Corporation of Karnataka Limited (PCKL).

1.1. KPTCL

KPTCL, incorporated in 1999, is a state owned company, responsible for supplying power to

the Electricity Supply Companies (ESCOMs) in Karnataka and to the consumers directly

Page 16: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 2

connected to the KPTCL power transmission grid. It looks after the construction and

maintenance of substations and transmission lines at 400/220/110/66kV voltage level.

1.2. Karnataka SLDC

Karnataka’s SLDC is the nodal agency for grid management under KPTCL. The SLDC is

responsible for load dispatch functions at day-ahead and real-time, in addition to operation and

maintenance of the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system.

1.3. KREDL

KREDL was established in 1996 to promote non-conventional energy sources and initiate all

necessary actions for energy conservation in the state. The company advises the Government

of Karnataka (GoK) on policies for harnessing RE sources to ensure a systematic and balanced

approach.

1.4. KPCL

KPCL is a state-run company, incorporated in 1970, involved in power generation for

Karnataka. It builds, operates, and maintains generating capacity including thermal, hydro-

electric, solar and wind generators.

1.5. PCKL

PCKL was set up by GoK in August 2007 as a special purpose vehicle, to supplement the

efforts of KPCL in capacity addition and long-term procurement of power for ESCOMs. PCKL

also facilitates short-term power purchase from energy exchanges and bilateral transactions for

ESCOMs.

2. Log Frame/Theory of Change/Programme Theory

As the power output from RE sources is variable in nature, a robust transmission grid

infrastructure is required to ensure secure and reliable supply of electricity. Therefore, it is

crucial to analyse the implication of adding RE technologies to the network. Table 1 provides

a log-frame detailing the scope, outcomes, baselines and stakeholders of the project activities.

Page 17: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 3

Table 1: Log Frame

Purpose Scope Objective Expected Outcome Base line Stakeholders

GIS Mapping To aid in better

visualisation of

existing and

upcoming RE plants,

along with evacuation

infrastructure

Karnataka State Mapping of existing

and planned solar and

wind capacities, along

with the substation

connectivity

Digitised and

updatable data in the

form of GIS map for

RE plants, along with

evacuation

infrastructure in

Karnataka

Latitude and

Longitude of

available datasets

for existing solar

and wind plants and

substations

KREDL

Power Flow

Studies

To analyse the

capability of network

infrastructure to

handle generation and

demand (factoring

expansion plans until

FY 2019)

Transmission

network: 110 kV and

above

Identification of

transmission network

constraints in lieu of RE

additions

Synchronised

planning transmission

infrastructure and RE

additions. Framework

for assessing

transmission

expansion plans.

Network mapping of

110 kV for

Karnataka

KPTCL

Integrated planning

framework

To provide a

visualisation platform

that can be used for

planning RE

deployment/expansion

Karnataka State Develop GIS-enabled

web-based

computational model to

assist the state in

planning for a high RE

transition

Enable visualisation

of various scenarios

of interest for the

energy planning

department. The

integrated platform

developed for

Karnataka can be

replicated for other

states

CSTEP developed

modules for an

Integrated Resource

Planning (IRP)

framework for

Karnataka, which

provides analysis of

potential RE sites in

the state along with

multi-criteria

analysis for siting

and zoning.

KPTCL, Energy and

Planning Departments

Page 18: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 4

3. Progress Review

Karnataka is ranked third, after Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra, in terms of RE with installed

capacity of 7.3 GW as of March 2017. Renewable sources contributed to around 35% of the

state’s installed capacity as of March 2017 (Figure 1). This compares with Tamil Nadu, the

top-ranking RE-rich state, with an RE capacity of 10.6 GW, followed by Andhra Pradesh, with

a capacity of 6.2 GW, and Telangana with 1.5 GW (Central Electricity Authority, 2017).

Figure 1: Karnataka's fuel-wise installed capacity (MW)

To promote growth of RE, the GoK introduced various policies and initiatives.

3.1. Karnataka’s RE Policies

Karnataka’s Renewable Energy Policy 2009-14 (Government of Karnataka, 2010), was

launched in 2010, for systematic and faster development of RE sources in the state. The state

aimed to achieve RE capacity of 6.6 GW by 2014, by adding 1 GW each year. Considering

Karnataka’s high RE potential (estimated to be 24.7 GW (Government of Karnataka, 2014)),

the government wanted to make Karnataka the leading RE state in the country. In view of this,

the government issued the new RE policy (2016-2022). This policy covers wind, solar-wind

hybrid, small hydro, biomass, cogeneration, tidal energy and waste-to-energy technology.

Some key objectives of the new policy are listed below (Government of Karnataka, 2017):

Achieve a minimum capacity addition of 4 GW by 2022 in a phased manner.

Promote new programmes for development of RE such as:

o Re-powering of old wind power plants

o Introducing hybrid RE projects with a combination of wind and solar

8,680

3,629880

7,278

Thermal Hydro Nuclear Renewable

Page 19: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 5

o Encouraging farmers to set up wind power projects on their land

o Introducing gross metering for various categories of consumers.

Set up pumped storage based hydro plants for grid management considering huge

penetration of RE into the grid.

Set up a dedicated “Project Monitoring Cell” enabling improved project planning,

coordination and monitoring.

Establish a “Renewable Energy Center of Excellence and Incubation Center” at the state

level for promoting innovation in technology, skill development and research and

development.

3.2. Karnataka Solar Policies

Karnataka government decided to implement a dedicated ‘Karnataka Solar Policy 2011-16’ for

the development of solar projects (both solar thermal and solar photovoltaic) in the state,

including captive and bundled plants(Government of Karnataka, 2011). This was in line with

the Government of India’s Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission (JNNSM), which targeted

an increase in solar energy consumption from 0.25% in 2011 to 3% of the total energy

consumption, by 2022 (Press Information Bureau, Government of India, 2011).

The policy targeted all forms of solar deployment: rooftop Photovoltaic (PV) systems, off-grid

systems, solar farms and large solar parks1. However, by FY14, only 31 MW of solar grid

connected capacity was installed in the state, as opposed to a 120 MW target by FY 2013-14

(“Details of Year wise Commissioned Projects of Renewable Category in MW,” 2018).

In light of the technological developments and pursuant to achieve 3% solar generation of the

total energy consumption, GoK reviewed the earlier Karnataka Solar Policy 2011-16 and issued

a new Karnataka Solar Policy 2014-21, in May 2014. The new policy aims for 6 GW of solar

generation projects by 2021, out of which 2.4 GW would be grid connected rooftop solar

generation projects. Further, the policy aimed for addition of 400 MW of rooftop solar capacity

every year, from 2014-2018. In an effort to achieve these targets, the Karnataka Electricity

Regulatory Commission (KERC) exempted RE projects from wheeling and banking charges

for the first 10 years of operation. Meanwhile, in line with National Tariff Policy amendment

in 2016, Karnataka aims for solar energy generation to contribute to 8% of consumed energy,

excluding hydropower (Press Information Bureau, Government of India, 2016) in 2022.

1 Solar parks utilise uneven wastelands with common facilities like watch and ward to encourage developers to

deploy solar generation on a plug-and-play model.

Page 20: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 6

3.3. Taluk-wise Limits

The Solar Policy 2014-21 (as amended on Jan 12, 2017) mandates that the total grid-connected

solar generation under all schemes would be subject to a 200 MW per taluk limit. This limit

excludes rooftop solar generators, as well as canal-top solar plants and grid-connected projects

that hybridise solar with other RE generators. It is thus applicable to all utility-scale solar farms,

captive solar generation, bundled power generation by conventional generators and off-grid

solar distributed generation.

3.4. Renewable Purchase Obligation in Karnataka

Renewable Purchase Obligation (RPO) is a means to ensure that distribution companies, open

access consumers and captive power producers purchase a minimum quantity of their energy

consumption from RE sources. KERC issued the “Procurement of Power from Renewable

Sources” regulation in March 2011. As per this regulation, all the distribution companies, in

Karnataka as well as captive and open access consumers in the state had to source a certain

portion of their energy consumption from RE.

The regulation has undergone various amendments. The latest (fifth) amendment (Karnataka

Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2011) which was made on Feb 20, 2018, increased the

solar RPO targets for the state from 1.75% to 6% in 2018-19. The non-solar RPO currently

ranges from 7% to 13% for different ESCOMs.

3.5. Karnataka’s RE Trend

Over a period of 6 years i.e., from FY 2011-12 to 2016-17, the RE capacity in Karnataka has

seen significant growth with a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15%. This steep

increase in RE addition was due to the creation of the Solar Policy in 2011. The growth in

installation of solar generation capacity was around 162%, the highest among all renewables,

during the same period. Out of the RE installed capacity of 7278 MW in FY 2016-17, wind

energy contributes the most (52%), followed by co-generation (19%), solar (15%), small hydro

(12%) and biomass (2%).

Page 21: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 7

Figure 2 depicts the growth in RE in the state from FY 2011-12 to FY 2016-17 (“Details of

Year wise Commissioned Projects of Renewable Category in MW,” 2018). Figure 3 illustrates

the source-wise break-up of renewable capacities in the state as of FY 2016-17.

Figure 2 : RE growth in the state from FY12 to FY17

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Inst

alle

d c

apac

ity

(G

W)

Financial Year

WIND SOLAR SMALL HYDRO BIOMASS CO-GENERATION

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

Inst

alle

d c

apac

ity

(G

W)

Financial Year

WIND SOLAR SMALL HYDRO BIOMASS CO-GENERATION

Page 22: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 8

Figure 3: Source-wise RE Installed Capacity Mix in FY17 (MW)

3.6. Karnataka’s Transmission Growth

KPTCL’s network was upgraded to 220 kV with the commission of the first 220 kV line of

361km between Sharavathi – Shimoga – Peenya in 1965. The first inter-state 220 kV line of

162 km was commissioned in 1965 between Peenya and Singarpet (Government of India &

Government of Karnataka, 2016).

At the end of FY 2011-12, KPTCL owned around 30,539 circuit kilometres (ckms) of

transmission lines, 46,273 MVA of transformation capacity and 966 substations at different

voltage levels in the state (Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2013); its

transmission loss was around 3.91% (Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2013).

Over the next 6 years, KPTCL’s transmission line capacity grew at a CAGR of 2.83%

(Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited, 2017), and is now around 35,119 ckms

(Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission, 2018). Similarly, the number of substations

under KPTCL increased to 1,127 (Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited, 2017)

at different voltage levels, with CAGR of 3.13% (Karnataka Electricity Regulatory

Commission, 2013). As a result of periodic capacity addition over the last six years,

Karnataka’s transmission loss reduced to 3.28% in FY 2016-17.

Figure 4 illustrates the reduction in KPTCL’s transmission losses from FY 2011-12 to 2016-

17.

3,799

1,116

843

134

1,386

WIND SOLAR SMALL HYDRO BIOMASS CO-GENERATION

Page 23: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 9

Figure 4: KPTCL transmission loss (%) from FY12 to FY17 (Source: Data obtained from KERC Tariff Orders)

4. Problem Statement

Integration of high level of RE to the state’s transmission network

By FY2019, around 6.86 GW of solar and 4.9 GW of wind capacity is expected to be

commissioned in Karnataka. Since RE sources are intermittent and variable in nature,

absorbing electricity from RE generators at higher capacities, along with meeting rising

demand, is likely to cause network constraints. These network constraints can be in the form

of under-voltage, over-voltage and/or overloading of grid elements. Hence, power flow

analysis to assess the impact of high RE on the grid is imperative. The simulation of future

scenarios with varying high RE penetration levels and load conditions will aid in planning for

grid strengthening requirements and associated investments.

5. Scope, Objectives and Evaluation Questions

5.1. Scope

Reference Period: The main scope of the study is to examine the implication of existing and

planned RE capacity additions, for FY 2017-18 and FY 2018-19, by undertaking power flow

studies.

Geographical coverage: The study covers the entire state of Karnataka at 110 kV and above

level. A snapshot of KPTCL’s Karnataka transmission map as on March 31, 2018 is shown in

Figure 5.

3.913.81

3.88

3.66

3.53

3.28

3.1

3.3

3.5

3.7

3.9

4.1

4.3

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17

Per

cen

tage

Financial Year

Page 24: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 10

Figure 5: Karnataka transmission map (Source: CSTEP Analysis, data from KPTCL)

Page 25: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 11

5.2. Objective

The core objective of this study is to develop a GIS enabled, web-based energy planning

platform which can assist the state in planning for high levels of RE integration. The study

assesses the level of planned RE capacities that can be absorbed by Karnataka’s transmission

grid.

5.3. Evaluation Question

This study primarily evaluates three questions:

1. How will planned addition of RE (up to FY 2019) along with conventional generation

sources, impact the transmission infrastructure?

2. How will taluk-wise RE addition schemes impact the transmission network?

3. What level of transmission infrastructure upgrades, if any, will be required and what are

the associated investments required?

CSTEP team conducted detailed power flow studies at voltage levels of 110 kV and above to

answer the above questions2. Key outputs of this study, based on specific scenarios and

assumptions, include:

Number of overloaded lines/substations

Network elements that need to be strengthened

Impact of taluk-level limits on RE capacity

Network strengthening costs

Integrated Energy Planning Platform

6. Evaluation Design

The planning, design and operation of power systems require calculations to analyse the

performance and study the effects of changes in network configuration, under various operating

conditions. The study is focused on performing power system simulation of Karnataka’s

transmission network in view of planned addition of RE capacity to the grid. The results of

power flow studies are then integrated into the visualisation and planning platform. The core

techniques used in this study are described below.

6.1. Data and Information Sources

The study begins with collection of system data at voltage levels of 110 kV and above, which

includes sub-stations, generation, transmission lines and load-related information. The primary

sources of information for conducting the studies were government departments including,

2 With support and feedback/inputs from KPTCL and SLDC officials

Page 26: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 12

KPTCL, SLDC, PCKL, KREDL and the Southern Region Load Dispatch Centre (SRLDC),

and Central Electricity Authority (CEA). Table 3 provides details of data sources.

6.2. Research Methods

The primary research method used in this study is the power flow simulation. A power flow

simulation determines the state of the power system with respect to a given load and generation

schedule. The objective is to obtain the voltage magnitude and phase-angle at each bus3, along

with power flow in each line, given the demand and generation level at each bus. It is a common

computational procedure used in power system analysis. These power flow (also called load

flow) solutions are obtained using computer programs designed specifically for this purpose.

Computer programs to solve power flows are divided into two types: planning (offline) and

operational (real-time). Most power flow studies for system analysis are based on offline

network models. Operational power flows (real-time) that incorporate data input from the

actual networks are typically used by utilities in SCADA systems. In this study, steady-state

offline power flow analyses are performed using a commercial software package – Electrical

Transient Analyser Program (ETAP).

6.3. Evaluation Criteria

The impact of addition of RE, as well as demand variations in the grid have been assessed using

power flow studies. The indicators that were used to evaluate the results of the analysis were:

number of overloaded lines/substations, number of lines that need to be strengthened and

voltage profile of buses. Bus voltages have both upper and lower limits, while branches have

upper flow limits. Branch flows are conventionally expressed as percentages of their rated

capacity (maximum transfer); thus, 100% is the upper limit for flows in branches. Voltage

limits for buses depend upon the specific type of bus. The relevant bus limits are given in Table

2 (Central Electricity Authority, 2013).

Table 2: Voltage bus limits

Nominal voltage (kV) Min Voltage (kV) Max Voltage (kV)

400 380 420

230 202 240

220 202 240

110 101 120

3 In a power system, a bus is a component that acts as an interconnection point to which electrical elements like

generators, transformers, loads and transmission lines are connected.

Page 27: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 13

7. Evaluation Methodology

The main scope of the analysis is to undertake power flow studies for examining the implication

of existing and planned RE capacity additions, for years FY 2017-18 and FY 2018-19. A

systematic methodology was worked out to achieve the expected results (Figure 6).

Figure 6: Evaluation Methodology

A detailed explanation of the components is provided below.

7.1. Data

The following datasets were sought from the relevant agencies (Table 3):

1. Existing and proposed: Transmission line, substation, generation (thermal, hydro and

nuclear), bus/line reactor4 details up to 2018-19

2. Existing and proposed: RE generator details (solar, wind, biomass, co-generation and

small hydro) up to 2018-19

3. Grid connectivity details of RE plants

4. SCADA snapshots for network validation

5. Power purchase data up to 2018-19

6. GIS locations of existing substations, and generators (both conventional and RE).

4 Reactors are inductive elements used in Alternating Current (AC) grids for voltage control.

Base case

GenerationTransmission networkSCADA snapshots

Expansion plans

Scenarios

Generation • RE • Conventional Transmission network

Power Flow Analysis (ETAP)

Projected demand

Validated base case

Year-wise expansion plans

Visualisationplatform

Branch flowsBus voltages

Network constraints+

Investments required

Page 28: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 14

7.2. Network Modelling

In this study, network was considered at 110 kV and higher voltage level. 110 kV substations

along with associated transformers were considered (including 110/33 kV, 110/11 kV,

220/110/66 kV substations). The loads and generations at 66 kV substations were lumped at

the nearest upstream higher voltage substations (110 kV and 220 kV). Details about

transmission network were gathered from KPTCL, SLDC and SRLDC (Annexure I).

7.3. Base Case

The next step was consolidation of power system data file, analysing the data and validating it

with the SCADA snapshots provided by SLDC. The network details for the benchmark year

(2016-17) were acquired from the state transmission utility. This included network

connectivity, details of the transmissions lines, connecting substations, locations of generating

stations and load centres. KPTCL’s existing transmission network (up to 110 kV) was modelled

in ETAP. The SCADA snapshot was obtained from the SLDC to validate and match the flows

of the network for a particular instant. This was used to validate the base case network. Upon

finalising the base case, power flow analysis was carried out for FY 2017-18 and FY 2018-19.

Different scenarios were considered to capture the variation in RE generation and system

demand and their effect on the transmission network.

7.4. Demand Estimation

The demand data corresponding to the instants at which the state peak and off-peak load

occurred were captured from the state’s hourly demand data for years 2011 through 2017.

Using linear regression, demand for all scenarios were forecast for FY 2017-18 and FY 2018-

19. The aggregate demand forecast for the state was then apportioned at the substation level

assuming the same ratio as observed in the validation SCADA snapshot.

7.5. Expansion Plans

The FY 2017-18 and FY 2018-19 transmission and generation expansion plans were collected

from KPTCL, PCKL, KREDL and CEA. These plans were collated into uniform datasets,

which were then modelled in ETAP as generators, transformers and transmission lines.

7.6. Interstate Generation

The entire Indian grid is an interconnected network that encompasses all state networks,

regardless of operational control and ownership. At the same time, Karnataka, like most states,

has substantial generation capacity under its own ownership and operation. The Central

Generating Stations (CGS) have a fixed quota of their generating capacity assigned to the state

Page 29: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 15

in which they are physically located and to some nearby states as well. These stations are

normally run at full capacity. Karnataka hosts two CGS: Kaiga Atomic Power Station and

Kudgi Super Thermal Power Station. Karnataka is also assigned a share from multiple CGS

stations in Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Odisha. These details along with capacity shares

assigned are listed out in the Annexure IV5.

7.7. Scenario Cases

The study considered six scenarios in order to cover various grid conditions at different times

of the year, when varying load and peak/off-peak solar and wind generation have a significant

impact. The cases were analysed to check the strength of the upstream transmission lines and

transformers. The purpose of undertaking this analysis was to indicate if the transmission assets

are stressed or under-utilised, while respecting the system operation limits (voltage magnitude,

transmission line limits). The following scenarios were analysed for FY 2017-18 and FY 2018-

19.

Scenario 1: State peak load condition

Scenario 1(a): State off-peak load condition

Scenario 2: Peak solar generation

Scenario 2(a): Off-peak solar generation

Scenario 3: Peak wind generation

Scenario 3(a): Off-peak wind generation

Following the base case validation, the impact of these scenarios on the transmission network

was assessed.

7.8. Applicability of Pumped Hydro Storage

There are many methods to store energy in a power system, of which pumped hydro storage

forms the vast majority (>99%) the world over (Bianchi et al., 2015). Karnataka currently does

not have any pumped hydro plants in operation. CEA regularly surveys and assesses potential

pumped hydro sites. In the 1987 reassessment of pumped hydro sites, there were 4 potential

project sites identified in Karnataka: Kollur, Minhole, Sitanadi and Hulagi. However, all the

four plans were later scrapped as the sites are situated in the ecologically sensitive Western

5 Data obtained from PCKL

Page 30: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 16

Ghats and were not granted permissions on environmental grounds (Japan-India Cooperation

Agency, n.d.).

Other pumped hydro projects that have been proposed in Karnataka are:

Sharavathi: A pre-feasibility study for pumped hydro in Sharavathi valley was carried

out by WAPCOS Limited(Karnataka Power Corporation Limited, 2017). The largest

hydro generating station in the state is situated on the Sharavathi river. The Sharavathi

Generating Station (SGS) utilises water from the Talakalale reservoir. In 2017, a

prefeasibility study for setting up a pumped hydro station on the same river was carried

out by WAPCOS Limited (Karnataka Power Corporation Limited, 2017). The study

has since obtained environmental approval (“Activists up in arms as Sharavathi power

project gets green clearance,” 2017) and a Detailed Project Report (DPR) is under

preparation. The project proposes to set up a pumped hydro powerhouse of capacity 2

GW with reversible turbine-generator sets of 250 MW capacity each. The project

proposes to utilise the existing Talakalale reservoir as its upper reservoir, and

Gerusoppa reservoir (also existing) as the lower reservoir.

Kalinadi (Japan-India Cooperation Agency, n.d.): This proposal envisions using the

existing Kadra reservoir as the lower reservoir. A new upper reservoir is proposed to

be built on a nearby hilltop. The powerhouse is proposed to be of either 600 MW or

1,000 MW. The project is currently in the pre-feasibility evaluation stage.

Varahi (Japan-India Cooperation Agency, n.d.): This proposal envisions using the

existing Varahi pickup reservoir as the upper reservoir. A new lower reservoir is

proposed to be constructed downstream of the tailrace outlet of the existing Varahi

hydro-electric power plant. The powerhouse is currently proposed to be of capacity 700

MW, although 250 MW, 600 MW, and 1,000 MW are also options under consideration.

While a pre-feasibility report has been prepared and a DPR is under preparation, the

project site may be affected by some environmental issues.

Since none of the projects have a DPR, it is unlikely that any pumped hydro plants would be

coming up in the next five years. For this reason, this project does not consider any pumped

hydro generators in the power flow analysis.

Page 31: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 17

7.9. Outputs

7.9.1. Strengthening required and associated cost

Based on the results of the power flow analyses, the study identified strengthening measures

such as addition of new transmission lines and augmentation or addition of substations. The

study also provided investment estimates for such proposed network elements.

7.9.2. Taluk-wise analysis

Taluk-level limits of 200 MW for solar, 100 MW for wind, and 100 MW of Hybrid RE (solar

+ wind) were imposed on all taluks by the Karnataka State Solar Policy 2014-2021 (amended

on 12th January 2017). The study looked into the impact of taluk-wise limits on the grid for

the selected taluks.6 From within solar and wind rich zones, five taluks each were selected for

solar limits, wind limits and hybrid limits7. These analyses were conducted for FY 2018-19.

For modelling the solar and wind limits, each taluk was individually considered and the

installed solar/wind capacity within that taluk increased to reach the upper limit. For modelling

Hybrid RE limits, an equal mix of solar and wind capacity was preferred unless existing

capacity was too high. This increase in capacity was not simultaneously considered for more

than 1 taluk at a time. The method followed is described below in detail.

1. Solar limit feasibility: The installed solar capacity within that taluk is increased to 200

MW. The state peak solar scenario conditions were considered for this simulation.

2. Wind limit feasibility: The installed wind capacity within that taluk is increased to 100

MW. The state peak wind scenario conditions were considered for this simulation.

3. Hybrid limit feasibility: Hybrid limit feasibility analysis involved subjecting the

selected taluks to limit levels of both solar and wind generation simultaneously. The

limit was checked in both state peak solar and peak wind conditions.

a. If each is less than 50 MW limit: Both were increased to 50 MW

b. If solar is more than 50 MW limit: Wind is increased so that total hybrid

capacity in the taluk is 100 MW

c. If wind is more than 50 MW limit: Solar is increased so that total hybrid capacity

in the taluk is 100 MW.

6 Wind and Hybrid limits were considered as per discussions with Energy department, GoK 7 Based on discussions with Energy department, GoK

Page 32: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 18

7.9.3. Integrated Energy Planning Platform

CSTEP has developed a user-friendly, integrated Geospatial Information System (GIS) based

visualisation platform to view various scenarios of RE penetration. The GIS software system

can store, analyse and display geographical location information pertaining to conventional

plants, RE plants, transmission lines and substations.

In order to prepare the data for the Energy Planning Platform (EPP), each dataset was cleaned

and normalised; multiple publicly available data sources were referred to and the datasets were

given unique identifier serial codes for easier handling. All point elements such as substations

and generators were assigned locations.

The platform utilises two types of data; static data including network elements, grid

connectivity and generators (of all types); and scenario data including actual power generated

from different generators and service status of network elements. Each set of static data is

shared across all the scenarios for a given study year. Scenario data is generated separately for

each scenario as an output from the power flow analysis.

The following steps were followed for populating the planning platform:

Step 1: Databases were populated with static data (network elements and generating

stations) after being normalised

Step 2: Tables with geographical data (generating stations, substations and transmission

lines) were converted to shapefiles

Step 3: Shapefiles were plotted on the web platform with GIS software libraries

Step 4: Power flow reports were generated for individual scenarios

Step 5: Results from power flow reports were populated in the web platform

The EPP was developed using the (Model, View, Controller) MVC design pattern:

Model contains business logic and rules to manipulate data.

Controller handles the client requests, processes data from models and returns data to

the views for presentation on the user interface.

View contains the application's user interface acting as the application front end.

The backend of the platform was written in the Ruby language (version 2.2.2) using the Rails

framework (version 5.0.6) The EPP uses the Postgres database (version 9.0) along with the

Page 33: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 19

PostGIS extension. The frontend of the platform uses AngularJS for the user interface and

OpenLayers (version 2) for GIS functionality.

8. Data Collection and Analysis

This study assesses the transmission network for FY 2017-18 and FY 2018-19, using FY 2016-

17 as a baseline year. Data was primarily obtained from KPTCL, KREDL and SLDC. Also,

published reports were referred to for expansion plans and planning parameters. Details of

sources referred to are given in Table 3.

Further, this section also covers assumptions pertaining to resource mapping, network

modelling, scenario selection, and base case analysis.

8.1. Data sources

Table 3 details the various datasets collected from different agencies.

Page 34: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

20 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

Table 3: Data Matrix

Category Data Type Data collection method Dataset

RE data Primary data Interaction with

KREDL officials

1. Existing solar plants (Capacity & Location)

2. Existing wind plants (Capacity & Location)

3. Proposed/Planned wind plants for 2017-18 & 2018-19 in Karnataka

4. Proposed/Planned solar plants for 2017-18 & 2018-19

5. Existing & Proposed co-generation plants

6. Existing & Proposed biomass plants

7. Existing & Proposed small hydro plants

Interaction with

KPTCL officials

1. Substation connectivity for existing solar plants (partial)

2. Substation connectivity for existing wind plants (partial)

Network

data

Primary

Data

Interaction with

KPTCL officials

1. Existing transmission line data – 110 kV and above voltage level (Line

connectivity, line length, type of conductor, number of circuits, etc.)

2. Substation data – 110 kV and above voltage level buses (Name of substation,

voltage level, number of transformers, etc.)

3. Transmission network geographical map

4. GIS locations for substations (Latitude and Longitude along with pin code)

5. Proposed transmission network up to 2018-19

6. Conventional generators – (thermal, hydro, nuclear)

7. Reactor details (partial)

Interaction with SLDC 1. SCADA snapshots of transmission network for validation

2. Transmission line parameters along with line lengths

3. Interstate transmission lines

4. Scenario dates

5. Grid reactors

Interaction with PCKL

officials

1. Existing & proposed central generating stations

Page 35: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 21

Category Data Type Data collection method Dataset

Secondary

data

From CEA reports 1. Status of transmission lines under construction details in Karnataka along with

proposed lines

2. Details of status of substation under construction in Karnataka along with proposed

substation

3. Commissioning status of thermal plants

4. Central Generating Station details

5. Transmission line parameters and rating for different types of conductors

6. Permissible maximum and minimum voltage limits for planning studies

7. Power factor to be considered for grid connected RE (solar & wind) plants

8. Transmission network connectivity data for proposed solar park at Pavagada

Page 36: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 22

8.2. Resource Mapping

Figure 7 shows a map of the complete set of geo-located solar and wind plants in Karnataka,

as of March 31, 2018.

The following assumptions were considered due to limitations in the collected data:

KREDL datasheet on solar and wind projects was used to obtain village and taluk

names, date of commissioning and sanctioning scheme.

Google location API was used to obtain the latitude and longitude of the nearest village.

The centroid of taluk was considered wherever village name was not available or not

found.

KREDL datasheet on commissioned small hydro projects was used to obtain location,

taluk and river names.

Project developer websites and satellite based online maps were used to obtain

coordinate related information for small hydro plants.

For plants where substation connectivity was not available, plants were connected to

the nearest substation at the appropriate voltage level.

Page 37: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 23

Figure 7: RE plants in Karnataka as on March 31, 2018

Page 38: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 24

8.3. Transmission Network

Figure 8 depicts a snapshot of Karnataka’s electric grid as modelled in ETAP.

Figure 8: Snapshot of ETAP model of Karnataka network in 2017-18

Assumptions that have been made during the modelling exercise are listed below:

1. Talcher-Kolar HVDC link is considered as a slack bus.

2. CGS generators are scheduled to their rated capacity negating auxiliary consumption.

3. Auxiliary consumption of 8.5% is considered for both thermal and nuclear generators

and 1% is considered for hydro generators.

4. Power factor of 0.98 (absorbing) is considered for RE plants.

5. Inter connecting transformer (ICT) impedance is considered as 12.5% on its own MVA

base.

6. Interstate import/export lines are modelled as lumped generators/loads.

7. Loads are modelled at 66/33/11 kV buses of 220 kV and 110 kV substations with 0.95

PF lag.

Page 39: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 25

8. Wherever grid connectivity data of RE plants was not available, those plants were

connected to nearby 110 kV or 220 kV substations based on their geographical location.

9. To supply the power demand, conventional generators are given last priority for

scheduling considering the primary contribution from RE plants and CGS power share

for Karnataka.

8.4. Scenarios

In the study, network, generation and load growth data were consolidated for FY 2016-17 (base

year), FY 2017-18 and FY 2018-19 from data provided by KPTCL, SLDC, KREDL and PCKL.

In order to perform steady state analyses, the following instants (Table 4) were chosen to

account for varying loading and RE resource availability conditions, based on discussions with

SLDC.

Table 4: Scenario dates chosen

# Scenario Day Calendar

Year (FY

2017-18)

Calendar Year

(FY 2018-19)

Time

1 State peak load March 30 2018 2019 10 AM

1(a) State light load October 15 2017 2018 3 AM

2 Peak solar generation February 16 2018 2019 1 PM

2(a) Off peak solar generation February 16 2018 2019 7 PM

3 Peak wind generation July 15 2017 2018 3 PM

3(a) Off peak wind generation May 5 2017 2018 12 PM

The next section provides a detailed description of the base case and its validation process.

8.5. Base Case Scenario

The base case here refers to the KPTCL network considered at a specific instant of time in the

simulation software. In this study, the KPTCL network condition as on May 05, 2017,

10:09AM was considered as base case. The SCADA snapshot for this instant was collected

from SLDC to assign the loads for substations and to schedule the generation. Power

import/export from Karnataka was modelled as equivalent generation/load. The KPTCL load

generation balance considered for this case is given in Table 5.

Page 40: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 26

Table 5: KPTCL load generation balance report (May 5, 2017, 10:09AM)

Base case – LGBR snapshot

Particular Power in MW

Conventional & Nuclear 5,852.8

Non-Conventional Energy Plants

(NCEP)

500.6

Import* 5,911

Total power available 12,264.4

Load 8,739.4

Loads supplied by NCEP at lower

voltage level (<110 kV)

500.6

Export* 2,736

Loss 288.4

Total power consumed 12,264.4

* Sum of all interstate transmission line power flows at this time (Import/Export)

8.6. SCADA Flow Validation

It is necessary to validate the modelled network to ensure that the model closely matches with

the physical network. In this study, the existing network of KPTCL was validated by comparing

the power flow simulation results of ETAP with the SCADA snapshot (for the same instant

May 5, 2017, 10:09AM). The comparisons were made in terms of bus voltages and branch real

power flows. A sample snapshot showing power flow in and around Shantigrama 400 kV

substation is given in Figure 9. However, the power flows through 400 kV and 220 kV

transmission lines and voltages at 400 kV buses are compared with SCADA data and the details

are given in Annexure II.

Page 41: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 27

Figure 9: Power flow in Shantigrama 400kV substation

From the base case analysis, it can be seen that the line flows match SCADA values with less

than 10% difference for around 82% of 400kV lines and 91% of 220kV lines. Bus voltages

match SCADA values with less than 4% difference.

9. Findings and Discussion

This section describes the results of the analyses for FY 2017-18 and FY 2018-19.

9.1. Power Flow Analysis for FY 2017-18

The installed generation capacity considered was around 25,286 MW, of which the state sector

thermal generation had a major share (7,080 MW) followed by wind (4,602 MW), solar (4,473

MW), hydro (3,629 MW), CGS (3,280 MW), co-generation (1,229 MW), small hydro (831

MW) and biomass (131 MW). The total CGS import share for Karnataka was 2835 MW and

export share around 1676 MW, resulting in a net power import of around 1160 MW.

9.1.1. Load-Generation Balance

Power flow analysis was carried out for all the six scenarios as described in Section 8 of this

report. The system loading, losses and generation schedule for the scenario instants considered

for year FY 2017-18 is given in Table 6.

Under the peak solar and peak wind conditions, to maintain Karnataka CGS share, scheduling

priority was given to central sector thermal and nuclear generation such that state conventional

generations were backed down. For instance, in Scenario 1(a) i.e., state off peak load condition,

state thermal generators were not scheduled (in the power flow simulation) due to reduced state

SCADA Flows ETAP Flows

Page 42: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 28

demand. Similarly, in Scenario 2 (peak solar), state thermal generators were not scheduled

since solar generation was around 90% of its installed capacity which was sufficient to supply

the demand of the state. It can be seen from Table 6 that power generated by RE sources in FY

2017-18 varied from 713 MW to 5519 MW across the scenarios. Hence, the state thermal

generation was reduced by 71%–100% in order to absorb RE generation. Similarly, the hydro

generation had to be reduced by 27%–95%. Despite reduction in generation, it was observed

from power flow simulations that some 220 kV and 110 kV transmission lines and substations

were overloaded (Table 7).

Table 6: Load generation balance for FY 2017-18 (MW)

# Particulars (Total

installed capacity)

Scenario

1

Scenario

1(a)

Scenario

2

Scenario

2(a)

Scenario

3

Scenario

3(a)

State

peak

load

State off

peak load

Peak

solar

Off peak

solar

Peak

wind

Off peak

wind

1 State hydro (3,629) 2,647 596 353 1,626 182 823

2 State thermal

(7,080) 1,959 0 0 2,050 0 1,793

3

CGS -

Nuclear+Thermal

(3,280)

3,001 1,196 1,593 3,001 805 3,001

4 Solar (4,473) 1,610 0 4,026 0 671 1,922

5 Wind (4,602) 230 414 1,427 1,012 3,682 13

6 Co-generation

(1,229) 37 61 37 37 37 47

7 Biomass (131) 3 3 12 12 4 3

8 Small Hydro (831) 33 235 17 17 133 42

9 RE total

(4+5+6+7+8) 1,913 713 5,519 1,078 4,527 2,027

10 Import 4,342 3,965 3,889 4,260 3,840 3,945

Total power available

(1+2+3+9+10) 13,862 6,470 11,354 12,015 9,354 11,589

11 Load 10,679 3,663 8,623 8,915 6,674 8,803

12 Export 2,724 2,724 2,424 2,724 2,424 2,453

13 Losses 459 83 307 376 256 333

Total power consumed 13,862 6,470 11,354 12,015 9,354 11,589

9.1.2. Study results

The key findings from the power flow analyses for FY 2017-18 under different scenarios are

described below.

Page 43: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 29

1. In state peak load scenario, the 220 kV transmission network in and around Bengaluru

city is critically loaded. Overloading could be attributed to insufficient transmission

infrastructure in Bengaluru city to match its increasing power demand. Overloading is

mainly observed in lines associated with the 220 kV substations like Hebbal,

Yelahanka, Naganathpura, Nelamangala, Peenya and NRS (New Receiving Station).

The list of 220 kV lines in the Bengaluru city that are overloaded are given below:

The 220 kV corridor between Nelamangala-Peenya-NRS substations are

overloaded since Nelamangala is the major source for supplying loads at Peenya

and NRS substation. The 220 kV S/C line from Peenya to NRS substation,

especially, is overloaded by 28.5% of its rated capacity.

Somanahally to Naganathpura and Somanahally to HSR Layout 220 kV lines are

overloaded by 8.4% and 13%, respectively.

Hebbal to Yelahanka 220 kV S/C line is overloaded by 2.4% of its rated capacity.

This overloading issue may be resolved once the construction of Manyata 220 kV

substation, which can reduce the loading of Hebbal 220 kV substation, is completed.

As per KPTCL’s plan, the Manyata 220 kV substation will be connected to

Devanahalli 400 kV substation with LILO (Loop In Loop Out) arrangement of

Manyata to Hoody 220 kV D/C line. Thus, Devanahalli 400 kV substation will act

as a new source for supplying loads in areas surrounding Hebbal and Manyata

substation.

2. In peak solar scenario, few 110 kV lines in Bijapur and Bidar districts are loaded more

than their rated capacity. A list of such overloaded lines are given below:

110 kV S/C line from Bhutnal to Bijapur E is overloaded by 26.1%. This is because

around 150 MW of RE Plants are connected at Tikota, Tekkalaki and Bhutnal 110

kV substations. All these substations are radially connected to Bijapur E substation

through 110 kV S/C line. Since the local load in these substations is only around 13

MW, the power generated during peak solar condition will flow to Bijapur E

substation through the 110 kV S/C corridor. This would overload Bhutnal to Bijapur

E 110 kV S/C line. It is important to note that outage of any one line in this 110 kV

transmission corridor would result in disconnection of RE generators from the grid.

110kV S/C line from Santpur to Halbarga is overloaded by 88.2% of its rated

capacity. This is because around 146 MW of RE plants are connected at Santpur

Page 44: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 30

and Dongargaon. Santpur and Dongargaon substations are radially connected to

Halbarga 220 kV substation through 110 kV S/C corridor. Power generated during

peak solar condition will flow to Halbarga 220 kV substation as the local loads in

Santpur and Dongargaon substations are only around 12.2 MW; thus overloading

Santpur to Halbarga 110 kV S/C line. It is important to note that outage of any one

line in this 110 kV transmission corridor would result in disconnection of RE

generators from the grid.

3. In peak wind scenario, the 110 kV transmission corridor between Gadag-Sambapur-

Dambal-Mundaragi along with Gadag 220/110 kV substation (with 3×100 MVA

transformation capacity) is overloaded. This is because around 258 MW of RE plants

are connected to the above mentioned substations. These substations are radially

connected to Gadag 220 kV substation. Since the local load in this area is only around

12.6 MW, power generated during peak wind condition has to be evacuated through

this 110 kV transmission corridor which causes overloading of the corridor.

The summary of the study results for all the six scenarios is provided in Table 7.

Page 45: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 31

Table 7: Power flow study results for FY 2017-18

Scenario

# Condition Instant Inputs to the model Findings

Scenario

1

State peak

load

March

30,2018,

10:00AM

Ex-bus peak demand of 11,138 MW(1)

Generation mix

hydro – 27.8%, thermal – 43.6%, nuclear – 8.5%,

solar – 16.9%, wind – 2.4%, other RE(2) - 0.8%

9 numbers of 220 kV lines and 3 numbers of 110 kV lines

are overloaded.

Hebbal 2×100 MVA, 220/66 kV substation is overloaded

by 5.7%.

Scenario

1(a)

State off-

peak load

October

15, 2017,

03:00AM

Ex-bus peak demand of 3,746 MW

Generation mix

hydro – 23.7%, thermal – 15.6%, nuclear – 32.2%,

solar – 0.0%, wind – 16.5%, other RE - 11.9%

All the transformers and transmission lines are loaded

within their rated capacity.

With the existing reactors in KPTCL system, all the bus

voltages are within the acceptable limits.

Scenario

2

State peak

solar

Feb 16,

2018,

01:00PM

Ex-bus peak demand of 8930MW

Generation mix

hydro – 4.7%, thermal – 10.6%, nuclear – 10.8%,

solar – 53.9%, wind – 19.1%, other RE – 0.9%

1 number of 220 kV line and 7 numbers of 110 kV lines

are loaded more than their rated capacity.

All the transformers are loaded within their rated capacity.

Scenario

2(a)

State off-

peak solar

Feb 16,

2018,

07:00PM

Ex-bus peak demand of 9291MW

Generation mix

hydro – 21.0%, thermal – 54.8%, nuclear – 10.4%,

solar – 0.0%, wind – 13.0%, other RE – 0.8%

Peenya to NRS 220 kV S/C line and Netlamadnur to

Kanoje 110 kV S/C line are overloaded.

All the transformers are loaded within their rated capacity.

Scenario

3

State peak

wind

July 15,

2017,

03:00PM

Ex-bus peak demand of 6930MW

Generation mix

hydro – 3.3%, thermal – 0.0%, nuclear – 14.6%,

solar – 12.2%, wind – 66.8%, other RE – 3.2%

9 numbers of 110kV lines are overloaded.

Gadag 3×100 MVA, 220/110 kV substation is overloaded

by 31.7%.

Scenario

3(a)

State off-

peak wind

May 05,

2017,

12:00PM

Ex-bus peak demand of 9136MW

Generation mix

hydro – 10.8%, thermal – 52.2%, nuclear – 10.5%,

solar – 25.1%, wind – 0.2%, other RE – 1.2%

3 numbers of 220 kV lines are overloaded.

All the transformers are loaded within their rated capacity.

Note: (1) Peak demand has been considered from CEA LGBR for year 2017-18.

(2) Other RE includes co-generation, biomass and small hydro.

Page 46: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 32

9.2. Power Flow Analysis for FY 2018-19

The installed generation capacity considered for FY 2018-19 is around 28,900 MW, of which

state thermal generation had a major share (7,450 MW) followed by solar (6,860 MW), wind

(4,921 MW), hydro (3,629 MW), CGS (3,280 MW), co-generation (1,757 MW), small hydro

(841 MW) and biomass (131 MW). A notable change is the addition of the 370 MW combined

cycle gas power plant at Yelahanka. The total CGS export share for Karnataka remained the

same as for 2017-18, but the import share increased by 71 MW8. This results in a net power

import of around 1230 MW.

9.2.1. Load-Generation Balance

Power flow analysis was carried out for all the six scenarios as described in section 8 of this

report. The load generation balance considered for year 2018-19 is given in Table 8. As an

example, a snapshot of an overloaded line from the one-line diagram in ETAP software is

shown below in Figure 10.

8 This is due to 7% share from NLC New TPP-U#1 and U#2

Page 47: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 33

Figure 10: ETAP One-line view of overloaded line

Similar to the scenarios of FY 2017-18, scheduling priority was given to central sector thermal

and nuclear generation such that state conventional generators were backed down. Thus, in

Scenario 2, no conventional generators were scheduled. Similarly, in Scenario 3, due to high

wind generation, state thermal generators have not been scheduled. It can be seen from Table

8 that power generated by RE sources in FY 2018-19 varied from 778 MW to 7,782 MW across

the scenarios. Hence, the state thermal generation was reduced by 64%-100% in order to absorb

RE generation. Similarly, the hydro generation had to be reduced by 56%-100%. Despite

reduction in generation, it was observed from power flow simulations that some 220 kV and

110 kV transmission lines and substations were overloaded (Table 9).

Line over loaded (57%)

Peak Solar Condition

(Feb 16, 2019) at 1 PM

Page 48: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 34

Table 8: Load generation balance for FY 2018-19 (MW)

# Particulars (Total

installed capacity)

Scenario

1

Scenario

1(a)

Scenario

2

Scenario

2(a)

Scenario

3

Scenario

3(a)

State

peak

load

State off

peak

load

Peak

solar

Off peak

solar

Peak

wind

Off peak

wind

1 State hydro (3,629) 1,586 488 0 1,528 286 1,183

2 State thermal –

coal (7, 080) 2,602 0 0 2,199 0 732

3

CGS-

Nuclear+Thermal

(3,280)

3,001 3,001 0 3,001 805 3,001

4 Solar (6,860) 2,470 0 6,174 0 1,029 2,950

5 Wind (4,921) 246 443 1,526 1,083 3,937 14

6 Co-generation

(1,757) 53 88 53 53 53 70

7 Biomass (131) 3 3 12 12 4 4

8 Small Hydro (841) 34 244 17 17 135 42

9 RE total

(4+5+6+7+8) 2,806 778 7,782 1,165 5,158 3,080

10 State thermal – gas

(370) 100 100 0 100 56 100

11 Import 4,397 4,109 4,127 4,296 4,211 4,201

Total power available

(1+2+3+9+10+11) 14,492 8,476 11,909 12,289 10,516 12,297

12 Load 11,325 5,596 8,911 9,223 7,535 9,327

13 Export 2,724 2,724 2,724 2,724 2,724 2,724

14 Losses 443 156 274 342 257 246

Total power consumed 14,492 8,476 11,909 12,289 10,516 12,297

9.2.2. Study results

Key findings from the power flow analysis for FY 2018-19 under different scenarios are

described below:

1. Under peak load scenario it is observed that, the addition of PGCIL Singanayakanahalli

400/220 kV substation and its associated line to Yelahanka 220/66 kV (FY 2018-19)

resolves the overloading of 220 kV Nelamangala to Peenya, Hebbal to Yelahanka,

Somanahally to HSR Layout and Somanahally to Naganathpura lines would get

resolved. The new PGCIL Singanayakanahalli 400/220 kV substation will act as a new

source for supplying the Bengaluru city demand. To an extent, commissioning of this

new substation would relieve the loading of 220 kV lines emanating from Nelamangala

and Somanahally substation to Bengaluru city. On the other hand, it was observed that

Page 49: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 35

a few more 220 kV lines within the Bengaluru city will continue to overload in FY

2018-19 despite the new Singanayakanahalli substation. Such overloaded lines include:

Peenya to NRS 220 kV S/C line, overloaded by 47.6%

ITI to Hoody 220 kV S/C line, overloaded by 47.8%

Somanahally to Tataguni 220 kV S/C line, overloaded by 2.3%

2. In peak solar scenario, few 110 kV lines in Bijapur, Bidar and Koppal districts are

loaded than their rated capacity. Such 110 kV overloaded lines include:

Bhutnal to Bijapur E 110 kV S/C line, overloaded by 57%

Kustagi to Yelburga 110 kV S/C line, overloaded by 8.4%

Santpur to Halbarga 110 kV S/C line, overloaded by 87.4%

3. If all the wind plants planned for FY 2018-19 in Mundaragi, Dambal, Sambapur and

Gadag area get commissioned, 110 kV transmission corridor from Mundaragi upto

Gadag will be overloaded along with Gadag 220/110 kV (3×100 MVA transformation

capacity) substation under peak wind condition.

The summary of the study results for the scenarios are provided in Table 9.

Page 50: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

36 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

Table 9: Power flow study results for FY 2018-19

Scenario

# Condition Instant Inputs to the model Findings

Scenario

1

State peak

load

March

30, 2019,

10:00AM

Ex-bus peak demand of 11,768 MW(1)

Generation mix

hydro – 15.7%, thermal – 48.5%, nuclear – 8.0%,

solar – 24.5%, wind – 2.4%, other RE(2) - 0.9%

3 numbers of 220 kV lines and 6 numbers of 110 kV lines are

overloaded.

Hebbal 2×100 MVA, 220/66 kV and Naganathpura 2×100

MVA, 220/66 kV substation is overloaded by 13.3% and

1.3%, respectively.

Scenario

1(a)

State off

peak load

October

15, 2018,

03:00AM

Ex-bus peak demand of 5,752 MW

Generation mix

hydro – 11.2%, thermal – 52.6%, nuclear – 18.4%,

solar – 0.0%, wind – 10.1%, other RE – 7.7%

All the transformers and transmission lines are loaded within

their rated capacity.

With the existing reactors in KPTCL system, all the bus

voltages are within the acceptable limits.

Scenario

2

State peak

solar

Feb 16,

2019,

01:00PM

Ex-bus peak demand of 9,185 MW

Generation mix

hydro – 0.0%, thermal – 0.0%, nuclear – 0.0%,

solar – 79.3%, wind – 19.6%, other RE – 1.0%

2 number of 220 kV line and 3 numbers of 110 kV lines are

overloaded.

All the transformers are loaded within their rated capacity.

Scenario

2(a)

State off

peak solar

Feb 16,

2019,

07:00PM

Ex-bus peak demand of 9,565 MW

Generation mix

hydro – 19.1%, thermal – 56.2%, nuclear – 10.1%,

solar – 0.0%, wind – 13.5%, other RE – 1.0%

Peenya to NRS 220 kV S/C line and ITI to Hoody 220 kV

S/C line are overloaded by 16.3% and 13% respectively.

All the transformers are loaded within their rated capacity.

Scenario

3

State peak

wind

July 15,

2018,

03:00PM

Ex-bus peak demand of 7,793 MW

Generation mix

hydro – 4.5%, thermal – 0.9%, nuclear – 12.8%,

solar – 16.3%, wind – 62.4%, other RE – 3.0%

6 numbers of 110 kV lines are overloaded.

Gadag 3×100 MVA, 220/110 kV substation is overloaded by

30.8%.

Scenario

3(a)

State off

peak wind

May 05,

2018,

12:00PM

Ex-bus peak demand of 9,572 MW

Generation mix

hydro – 14.6%, thermal – 37.4%, nuclear – 9.9%,

solar – 36.4%, wind – 0.2%, other RE – 1.4%

Peenya to NRS 220 kV S/C line and ITI to Hoody 220 kV

S/C line are overloaded by 21.4% and 15.5%respectively.

All the transformers are loaded within their rated capacity.

Note: (1) Peak demand has been considered from CEA 19th EPS projections for year 2018-19.

(2) Other RE includes co-generation, biomass and small hydro.

Page 51: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 37

9.3. Integrated Energy Planning Platform

CSTEP has developed the Energy Planning Platform (EPP) for Karnataka state which provides

GIS based network flow visualisations and analysis taking into consideration various planning

scenarios. The platform can be accessed by using this URL: http://darpan.cstep.in/energy_pp/.

EPP application dashboard is composed of the following components:

Generation units (including existing and proposed conventional and RE plants)

Network elements (including existing and proposed substations and transmission lines

at different voltage levels)

Scenario analysis (depicting network constraint violations)

9.3.1. Generation units

The EPP home page contains GIS-based visualisation of generating units with different layers

to select power plants of each type. Details pertaining to each individual plant pop up on

selecting any power plant displayed on the map (screenshot in Figure 11)

Figure 11: CSTEP Karnataka EPP – Visualisation of generation units

9.3.2. Network elements

The EPP features a layered design allowing the user to view the network at different voltage

level(s). The platform displays static network elements including substation, transformers, and

transmission lines with details that pop up on selection (screenshot in Figure 12).

Page 52: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 38

Figure 12: CSTEP Karnataka EPP – Static network elements

9.3.3. Scenario analysis

The scenario visualisation component of the platform provides network flow visualisation for

different scenarios, namely, peak load, off peak load, peak solar, off peak solar, peak wind, off

peak wind for 2017-18 and 2018-19. Scenario visualisation provides insight about network

flow, overvoltages and undervoltages at substations and overloading of transmission lines for

each scenario (screenshot in Figure 13).

Figure 13: CSTEP Karnataka EPP – Scenario analysis

Page 53: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 39

9.4. Impact of Taluk-wise Limits

In this section, detailed integration analyses for taluk-wise solar limits, wind-limits and limits

on hybrid RE generation are presented. To check the impact of taluk-wise RE limits, five taluks

each were chosen based on discussion with energy department.

9.4.1. Solar

The taluk-wise solar limit was considered as 200 MW per taluk as per Karnataka Solar Policy.

Here, the transmission network, augmented up to FY 2018-19, is tested to check whether 200

MW of solar per taluk can be evacuated, for five selected taluks. It is observed from Table 10

that three taluk transmission networks can absorb the full solar capacity without having any

network constraints. The existing network of the other two taluks are incapable of evacuating

the solar capacity; thus, the networks need to be strengthened.

Page 54: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 40

Table 10: Taluk-wise solar limit feasibility

# Taluk Substation

RE capacity

connected

(MW)

Feasibility for

RE evacuation

Reason if not

feasible Suggestion

1 Koppal

Betagera 110 kV 27

Feasible - - Ginigere 110 kV 40

Koppal 110 kV 63

Kerehalli 110 kV 70

2 Sindhanur

Dadesugur 110 kV 40

Feasible - -

Sindhanur 220 kV 40

Sindhanur 110 kV 70

Turvihal 110 kV 40

Walkamdinni 110 kV 10

3 Sedam

Kurkunta 110 kV 53

Not feasible

Sedam 2×100

MVA,

220/110 kV

substation will

be overloaded

Addition of

3rd 100

MVA

transformer

at Sedam

220/110 kV

substation

Sedam 220 kV 147

4 Jewargi

Jewargi 110 kV 90

Not feasible

110 kV S/C

line from

Shahabad to

Jewargi will

be overloaded

New 110 kV

S/C line is

required from

Shahabad to

Jewargi

Mandewal 110 kV 110

5 Lingasugur

Gurugunta 110 kV 20

Feasible - - Hutti 110 kV 16

Lingasugur 220 kV 114

Mudgal 110 kV 50

9.4.2. Wind

The taluk-wise wind limit was considered as 100 MW per taluk, as discussed with the Energy

Department. Here, transmission network for FY 2018-19 is tested to check whether 100 MW

of wind capacity per taluk can be evacuated with the existing transmission network. It is

observed from Table 11 that with the existing network infrastructure, the entire wind capacity

can be evacuated for all five taluks without having any network constraints.

Page 55: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 41

Table 11: Taluk-wise wind limit feasibility

# Taluk Substation

RE

capacity

connecte

d (MW)

Feasibility for

RE evacuation

Reason if

not feasible Suggestion

1 Belgaum

Belgaum 220 kV 60.4

Feasible - -

Udaymbag 110 kV 9.6

Kanabaragi Layout

110 kV 10

Mache 110 kV 0

Vadagaon 110 kV 10

Suvarna Soudha 110

kV 0

Uchagaon 110 kV 10

Hirebagewadi 110 kV 0

2 Yelburga

Bevoor 110 kV 50

Feasible - - Ganadal 110 kV 50

Yelburga 110 kV 0

3 Basavana

Bagewadi

Basavana Bagewadi

220 kV 261.2

Feasible. Already

335.2 MW of

wind power plants

are planned in this

taluk by end of

FY 2018-19 and it

can be evacuated

without any

network

constraints.

- -

Mukarthihal 110 kV 74

Mattihal 110 kV 0

Nidagundi 110 kV 0

Malghan 110 kV 0

4 Bailahongal

Bailahongal 110 kV 30

Feasible - -

MK Hubli 220 kV 30

MK Hubli 110 kV 20

Kittur 110 kV 10

Udakeri 110 kV 10

5 Ranebennur

Aremallapur 110 kV 30

Feasible - - Ranebennur 220 kV 40

Tumminakatte 110

kV 30

9.4.3. Hybrid (Solar + Wind) RE

The taluk wise Hybrid RE limit was considered as 100 MW per taluk based on discussions

with the Energy Department. Here, FY 2018-19 transmission network is tested to check

whether 100 MW per taluk of solar+wind hybrid capacity can be evacuated with the existing

transmission network. It is observed from Table 12 that with the existing network

infrastructure, the full capacity of Hybrid RE can be evacuated for all five taluks without any

network constraints.

Page 56: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 42

Table 12: Taluk-wise solar-wind hybrid limit feasibility

# Taluk Substation

RE capacity

connected

(MW)

Feasibility for RE

evacuation

Reason

if not

feasible

Suggest

ion

1 Bellary

Alipura R/S 220 kV 0

Feasible. Around 123.1

MW of RE plants (Solar

+ Wind) are planned in

Bellary taluk by FY

2018-19 and the power

can be evacuated with

existing network

infrastructure without

having any network

constraints.

- -

Bellary (N) 110 kV 0

Bellary (S) 110 kV 0

Kurugod 110 kV 56.1

Moka 110 kV 0

PD Halli 110 kV 43

Somasamudra 110 kV 0

Torangal 110 kV 0

Kudithini 110 kV 0

Halakundi 110 kV 24

2 Bidar

Chidri 110 kV 10

Feasible - -

Habsikote 110 kV 18

Janawada 110 kV 20

Kamthana 110 kV 19

Halbarga 220 kV 18

Kolhar 110 kV 15

3 Indi

Atharga 110 kV 54 Feasible. Already 180.2

MW of wind power

plants are planned in this

taluk by end of FY 2018-

19 and it can be

evacuated without any

constraint in the grid.

- -

Indi 220 kV 126.2

Indi 110 kV 0

Hirebevanur 110 kV 0

Lachyan 110 kV 0

Zalaki 110 kV 0

4 Chikkodi

Ankali 110 kV 0

Feasible. Already 106.45

MW of wind power

plants are planned in this

taluk by end of FY 2018-

19 and it can be

evacuated without any

constraint in the grid.

- -

Bhoj (Galatga) 110 kV 35.85

Boregaon 110 kV 0

Chikkodi 220 kV 0

Chikkodi 110 kV 50

Kabbur (Nagar munnolli)

110 kV 20.6

Nippani 110 kV 0

Sadalaga 110 kV 0

Nanadi 110 kV 0

5 Raibaga

Hidakal 110 kV 0

Feasible - -

Kudachi 220 kV 10

Kudachi 110 kV 10

Raibag 110 kV 4

Itnal 110 kV 66.6

Kagwad 110 kV 0

Sultanpur 110 kV 9.4

Mantur 110 kV 0

Page 57: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 43

10. Recommendations

10.1. Network Strengthening Required

It is important that the transmission network be strengthened in order to accommodate the

expected influx of RE along with load growth. Augmenting existing lines, adding new lines,

upgrading substation infrastructure are some measures that can be implemented in order to

address network constraints. Specific measures, based on the observations made while

analysing the six scenarios, are discussed below.

1. From the power flow analysis it is observed that 220 kV transmission lines within

Bengaluru city were overloaded due to increase in load and insufficient transmission

infrastructure. Overloading was mainly observed in lines associated with Peenya, NRS,

ITI, Hoody and Somanahally 220 kV substations. The following measures were found

to be able to solve the overloading issue within the Bangalore city:

New 220 kV D/C 1000 sq.mm XLPE cable from PGCIL Bidadi 400/220 kV

substation to Vrushabavathi 220/66 kV substation is suggested to resolve the line

overloading issue associated with Vrushabavathi and Somanahally 220 kV

substations.

Additional S/C line from Peenya to NRS 220 kV substation is suggested to resolve

the overloading of existing 220 kV S/C line.

Addition of 3rd 100 MVA, 220/66 kV transformer at Naganathpura substation is

suggested to resolve the overloading of other transformers in the substation.

2. To resolve the 110 kV transmission line overloading observed in Bijapur, Bidar and

Koppal districts under peak solar scenario, the following lines are suggested:

New 110 kV S/C corridor from Tikota to Bijapur E substation via Tekkalaki, Torvi

and Bhutnal 110 kV substation.

New 110 kV S/C line from Yelburga to Kustagi 110 kV substation.

New 110 kV S/C corridor from Dongargaon to Halbarga substation via Santpur 110

kV substation.

3. During peak wind condition, network overloading was observed in Gadag area.

Following network strengthening is suggested to resolve the overloading issues:

Page 58: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 44

Upgradation of 110 kV Dambal substation to 220 kV by adding 2×100 MVA

transformers and one 220 kV D/C line connecting to Dhoni 400 kV substation.

A new 110 kV S/C line from Dambal to Mundaragi 110 kV substations.

A new 110 kV S/C line from VSPL to Mundaragi 110 kV substations.

Detailed explanation for the network constraints and possible solutions for the same are

explained in Table 13.

Page 59: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 45

Table 13: Network elements to be strengthened

# Overloaded element Occurrence Reason(s) Recommendation(s)

1 220 kV S/C line from

Somanahally to Tataguni Scenario 1

Increase in load at Tataguni and Vrushabavathi substations

Providing second source of power by switching ON NRS –

Vrushabavathi 220 kV S/C line (currently switched OFF)

would not resolve the issue since the line is already

overloaded with supplying the load at NRS, A station and

EDC substations.

Setting up a new 220 kV D/C 1000sqmm

XLPE cable from PGCIL Bidadi 400/220 kV

substation to Vrushabavathi 220/66kV

substation would act as a strong alternative

source for Vrushabavathi substation.

2 220 kV S/C line from

Peenya to NRS

Scenario 2,

Scenario 2(a),

Scenario 3(a)

Increase in load at NRS, A station and EDC substation

Setting up an additional 220 kV S/C line from

Peenya substation to NRS would resolve the

issue by sharing the load with the existing

line.

3 220 kV S/C line from ITI

to Hoody

Scenario 1,

Scenario 2,

Scenario 2(a),

Scenario 3(a)

Increase in load at ITI and Hebbal 220 kV substations,

radially fed from Hoody 220 kV substation

Providing second source by switching ON 220 kV S/C line

from Hebbal-tap to Hebbal 220 kV substation would result

in overloading of Yelahanka substation to Hebbal-tap 220

kV S/C line.

ITI 220 kV substation should be radially fed

from Hoody 220 kV substation by keeping ITI

to Hebbal 220 kV S/C line out of service.

Hebbal substation should be fed from

Yelahanka and Nelamangala substations by

keeping Hebbal-tap to Peenya 220 kV S/C line

open.

4

110 kV S/C corridor

from Kavoor to

Baikampady

Scenario 1

Increase in load at Baikampady substation fed by radial 110

kV S/C corridor from Kavoor substation

Many industries are connected to the corridor through radial

tap lines.

110 kV S/C line from Gurupura to Kavoor

substations can be LILO’ed at Baikampady

substation so that second source at

Baikampady substation would be established.

5 110 kV D/C line from

Kemar to Manipal Scenario 1

Increase in load at Manipal, Brahmavara, Hiriyadka,

Mahduvana, Kundapara and Navuda substations fed only by

Kemar substation.

Keeping 110 kV S/C line from Karkala

substation to Hiriyadka substation (currently

switched OFF) in service would help by

sharing the load supplied by 110 kV D/C line

from Kemar substation to Manipal substation.

6 110 kV S/C line from

Sagar to Alkola Scenario 1

Evacuation from Linganamakki Dam Powerhouse (LDPH)

and Mahatma Gandhi Hydro Electric station (MGHE)

110 kV S/C line from MGHE to Sirsi substation is currently

kept out of service.

Keeping 110 kV S/C line from MGHE to Sirsi

substation in service would resolve this issue

by acting as an additional evacuation line from

MGHE.

7

Naganathpura

2×100MVA, 220/66kV

substation

Scenario 1 Increase in load at Naganathpura 220 kV substation

Addition of 3rd 100 MVA transformer at

Naganathpura would resolve the overloading

issue.

Page 60: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

46 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Overloaded element Occurrence Reason(s) Recommendation(s)

8 Hebbal 2×100MVA,

220/66kV substation Scenario 1 Increase in load at Hebbal 220 kV substation

Early commissioning of Manyata 220/66 kV

substation (currently under construction)

would help in solving this issue by sharing the

load supplied from Hebbal substation.

9 110 kV S/C line from

Bhutnal to Bijapur E Scenario 2

Low load and increase in RE capacity, requiring evacuation

of power to Bijapur E substation

By the end of year 2018-19, around 174 MW of RE plants

are expected to be connected at Tikota, Tekkalakki and

Bhutnal substations. This generation has to be evacuated via

the 110 kV S/C corridor.

Setting up a new 110 kV S/C corridor from

Tikota to Bijapur E substation via Tekkalaki,

Torvi and Bhutnal substations would resolve

this issue.

10 110 kV S/C line from

Kushtagi to Yelburga Scenario 2

Increase in solar generation near Yelburga substation,

requiring evacuation to Kushtagi substation

Around 96 MW of solar plants are expected to be

commissioned near Yelburga 110 kV substation. Evacuating

all this generation via the substation will overload the S/C

line at peak solar condition.

Setting up a new 110 kV S/C line from

Yelburga substation to Kushtagi substation

would resolve this issue.

11 110 kV S/C line from

Santpur to Halabarga Scenario 2

Increase in solar generation at Dongargaon and Santpur

substation, requiring evacuation to Halabarga substation

Around 146 MW of solar plants are expected to be

commissioned near Dongargaon and Santpur 110 kV

substations. Evacuating all this generation via these

substations will overload this line at peak solar condition.

Setting up a new 110 kV S/C line from

Dongargaon substation to Halabarga

substation via Santpur substation would

resolve this issue.

12 110 kV corridor from

Mundargi to Gadag Scenario 3 Increase in RE generation in Gadag district

Around 16 MW of solar, 35.5 MW of co-generation and

252.45 MW of Wind plants are expected to be

commissioned near Mundargi, Shirahatti, Belahatti and

Dambal 110 kV substations. Evacuating all this generation

via these substations will overload the associated lines at

peak wind condition.

1. Upgradation of 110 kV Dambal substation

to 220 kV by adding 2×100MVA transformers

and connecting to Dhoni 400 kV substation

through 220 kV D/C line.

2. A new 110 kV S/C line from Dambal to

Mundargi.

3. A new 110 kV S/C line from VSPL to

Mundargi.

Would resolve the issue

13 Gadag 3×100 MVA,

220/110 kV substation Scenario 3

Page 61: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 47 47

10.2. Illustrative Cost Analysis for Strengthening

Illustrative cost analysis for year FY 2018-19 is given below in Table 14 and Table 15. Network

element costs were collected from KPTCL to calculate the investment required for transmission

strengthening. Detailed cost data collected from KPTCL is given in Annexure IV. From the

table, it can be inferred that the investment required for building new transmission line for the

year 2018-19 is around INR 594.9 crore, whereas the investment required for building new

substation is around INR 50 crore. The total investment required for year 2018-19 is INR 644.9

crore.

Under peak wind condition, it was observed from the power flow simulation that Gadag 220

kV substation transformers along with 110 kV wind evacuation lines were overloaded. To

avoid overloading in this condition, upgradation of Dambal substation from 110 kV to 220 kV

is proposed, along with associated 220 kV lines from Dambal to Dhoni 400/220 kV substation.

Other network strengthening proposals to accommodate planned RE additions or load growth

are summarised in Table 13. In addition to the cost incurred due to the reduction in conventional

generation (as explained in Sections 9.1.1 and 9.2.1), the overall power purchase cost may go

up because of fixed costs. This increase in cost depends on the terms of the Power Purchase

Agreement (PPA).

Page 62: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

48 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

Table 14: Illustrative cost analysis: Upgrading transmission lines for 2018-19

# Proposed transmission line upgrade Line length

(km)

Line cost (in INR

crore)

No. of

bays

Bay cost (in

INR crore)

Total cost (in

INR crore)

1 New 220 kV D/C 1000 sq.mm XLPE cable from Bidadi 400/220 kV

Substation to Vrishabhavathi 220/66 kV substation 22 506.0 4.0 6.0 512.0

2 New 220 kV S/C line from Peenya 220/66 kV substation to NRS

220/66 kV substation 7 5.0 2.0 3.0 8.0

3 LILO of 110 kV S/C line from Gurupura 110 kV substation to

Kavoor 220 kV substation at Baikampady 110 kV substation 6.62 3.0 2.0 0.8 3.8

4

New 110 kV S/C line from Tikota 110 kV substation to Bijapur E

110 kV substation via Tekkalakki, Torvi and Bhutnal 110 kV

substations

40 12.4 8.0 3.2 15.6

5 New 110 kV S/C line from Yelburga 110 kV substation to Kustagi

110 kV substation 28 8.7 2.0 0.8 9.5

6 New 110 kV S/C line from Dongargaon 110 kV substation to

Halabarga 110 kV substation via Santpur 110 kV substation 70 21.7 4.0 1.6 23.3

7 New 220 kV D/C line from Dambal 220/110 kV substation to Dhoni

400/220 kV Substation 5.5 3.6 4.0 6.0 9.6

8 New 110 kV S/C line from Dambal 220/110 kV substation to

Mundargi 110 kV substation 19 5.9 2.0 0.8 6.7

9 New 110 kV S/C line from Mundargi 110 kV substation to VSPL

(wind generation pooling point) 18 5.6 2.0 0.8 6.4

Total investment required for transmission lines (A) 594.9

Table 15: Illustrative cost analysis: Upgrading substations for 2018-19

# Proposed substation upgrade Transformer addition

(MVA) Total cost (in INR crore)

1 Addition of 3rd 100MVA transformer at Naganathpura 220/66kV substation 100 9

2 Upgradation of existing Dambal 110/11kV substation to 220/110/11kV substation with addition of

2×100MVA, 220/110 kV transformers. 200 41

Total investment required for substations (B) 50

Page 63: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 49

11. Reflection and Conclusion

The study analysed the capacity of the Karnataka grid to absorb 6.86 GW of solar and 4.9 GW

of wind capacity by FY 2018-19. Based on the analysis of different scenarios, it was observed

that substantial network strengthening is required in order to successfully integrate planned RE

capacity addition to the grid and accommodate current trends of load growth. During the

simulation, it was found that 18 transmission lines and 3 substations (220 kV) were overloaded,

despite backing down conventional generators.

Assuming all the RE plants planned for FY 2018-19 materialise, RE power alone would be

sufficient to meet projected state demand under peak solar and peak wind conditions. In order

to accommodate planned RE plants and also to serve state peak load, without causing network

overload, network strengthening has been proposed. The proposed strengthening envisages a

total investment of INR 645 crores for transmission lines and substations.

The taluk-wise feasibility studies showed that the 200 MW of solar capacity per taluk causes

network overloading in 2 out of 5 selected taluks. On the other hand, 100 MW of wind in the

selected taluks did not cause any network overloading. In the case of Hybrid RE, 100 MW can

be accommodated without any network overloading in all of the five selected taluks.

During state peak load conditions, the Bangalore Metropolitan Area Network (BMAN)

(“Bangalore Metropolitan Area Network,” 2018) was projected to experience load of around

3883.62 MW. Under this condition, 3 transmission lines (220 kV) were overloaded and 12 lines

(220 kV) were loaded to more than 80 % of their rated capacity.

Most of the 110 kV substations in Karnataka are operating radially, which would make it

difficult to maintain reliability under contingency. It is recommended that a ring connected

operation be considered.

A more detailed analysis involving short-circuit and transient stability studies would give a

more accurate picture of network constraints and suitable strengthening plans, in view of RE

generation uncertainty. Further, a thorough network analysis for the immediate future,

especially in BMAN area, should be undertaken in order to avoid any network constraints due

to load growth. A detailed transmission planning study, including the 66 kV network, is

recommended for a deeper understanding of network constraints in view of RE integration.

Page 64: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 50

12. References

Activists up in arms as Sharavathi power project gets green clearance. (2017, November 30). The

New Indian Express.

Bangalore Metropolitan Area Network. (2018, March 31). Power Transmission Map, Bengaluru:

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited.

Bianchi, M., Branchini, L., De Pascale, A., Peretto, A., Melino, F., & Orlandini, V. (2015). Pump Hydro

Storage and Gas Turbines Technologies Combined to Handle Wind Variability: Optimal

Hydro Solution for an Italian Case Study. Energy Procedia, 82, 570–576.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.872

Central Electricity Authority. (2013). Planning Manual.

Central Electricity Authority. (2017). Monthly Installed Capacity.

Details of Year wise Commissioned Projects of Renewable Category in MW. (2018, May 5).

Karnataka Renewable Energy Development Limited.

Government of India, & Government of Karnataka. 24 X 7 Power For All – Karnataka (2016).

Retrieved from

http://powerforall.co.in/AccessFolder/PFA_Document/1_Karnataka_PFA.pdf

Government of Karnataka. Karnataka Renewable Energy Policy 2009-14, Pub. L. No. EN 354 NCE

2008 (2010).

Government of Karnataka. Karnataka Solar Policy 2011-16, Pub. L. No. EN 61 NCE 2011 (2011).

Government of Karnataka. Karnataka Solar Policy 2014-21, Pub. L. No. EN 21 VSC 2014 (2014).

Government of Karnataka. Karnataka Renewable Energy Policy 2016-22 (2017).

Japan-India Cooperation Agency. (n.d.). Data Collection Survey on Power Sector in India (Chapter

5).

Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission. KERC (Procurement Of Energy From Renewable

Sources), Fifth Amendment (2011). Retrieved from

http://karnataka.gov.in/kerc/Regulations/Regulations/KERC%20(Procurement%20of

Page 65: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 51

%20Energy%20from%20Renewable%20Sources)%20(Fifth%20Amendment)%20Regu

lations%2C%202017.pdf

Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission. Tariff Order, 2013 (2013).

Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission. Tariff Order, 2018 (2018).

Karnataka Power Corporation Limited. (2017). Sharavathy Pumped Storage Project

(Prefeasibility Report).

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited. (2017). Annual Performance Review 2016-

17.

Press Information Bureau, Government of India. (2011). Amendment in Tariff Policy [Press

Release]. Retrieved from http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=68901

Press Information Bureau, Government of India. (2016). Cabinet approves amendments in Power

Tariff Policy to ensure 24X7 affordable Power for all [Press Release]. Retrieved from

http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=134630

Page 66: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 52

Page 67: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 53

Annexure I – Existing Network

(Data considered in this Study as existing on March 31, 2017 – includes both KPTCL and

PGCIL network)

Details of Generation Installed Capacity in Karnataka

Conventional generations

Table 16: Details of conventional generations as on March 31, 2017

# Generation name Generation type No of

units

Unit capacity

(MW)

Total capacity

(MW)

State sector

1 Alamatti Hydro 1 15

290 5 55

2 Bhadra Hydro

2 12

39.2 1 2

1 7.2

1 6

3 Ghataprabha Hydro 2 16 32

4 Gerusoppa Hydro 4 60 240

5 Kadra Hydro 3 50 150

6 Kodsalli Hydro 3 40 120

7 Linganamakki (LDPH) Hydro 2 27.5 55

8 Mani DPH Hydro 2 4.5 9

9 MGHE Hydro 4 21.6

139.2 4 13.2

10 Nagjhari/Kali Hydro 6 150 900

11 Shimsha Hydro 2 8.6 17.2

12 Shivanasamudra Hydro 4 6

42 6 3

13 Sharavathi Hydro 10 103.5 1,035

14 Supa Hydro 2 50 100

15 Varahi Hydro 4 115 460

Subtotal (State sector hydro) - A 3,628.60

1 Bellary TPS Thermal

1 700

1,700 1 500

1 500

2 Raichur TPS Thermal 7 210

1,720 1 250

3 Yeramarus Thermal 2 800 1,600

Subtotal (State sector thermal) - B 5,020

Toal state sector generation - C=A+B 8,648.6

Central sector

1 Kudgi Thermal 2 800 1,600

Page 68: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 54

# Generation name Generation type No of

units

Unit capacity

(MW)

Total capacity

(MW)

2 Kaiga Nuclear 4 220 880

Total central sector generation - D 2,480

Private sector

1 UPCL Thermal 2 600 1,200

2 JSW Thermal 2 300 600

2 130 260

Total private sector generation - E 2,060

Total RE generation - F 7,278

Total installed capacity in Karnataka C+D+E+F 20,466.60

Page 69: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 55

Non conventional generations

Solar generation

Table 17: Details of solar generation as on March 31, 2017

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity in

MW

Connected

substation

1 Welspun renewables energy pvt ltd - - - 16 C R patna 220

2 Bidar solar - - - 10 Chitapur 110

3 Dosti reality - - - 10 UAS dharwad

110

4 Clean solar power - - - 10 C R patna 220

5 Vedang solar(ravikumar) - - - 3 Thallak 220

6 Renew saur urja pvt ltd - - - 100 Ittagi 220

7 Burnish solar - - - 3 Hiryur 220

8 P somachandra - - - 12 Chitradurga 220

9 Jindal Aluminium Ltd Kalamarhalli Challakere Chitradurga 10 Hiryur 220

10 Sharda Construction and Corporation Private Ltd Satpur Aurad Bidar 6 Santpur 110

11 Dr. Vijaya Shankar (Sirawar Renewable Energy Pvt

Ltd siravara manvi raichur 2 Sirwar 110

12 Mourya Seelam (Mourya seelam power project

(MSPP). Ballari) karekallu Bellary Bellary 3 PD halli 110

13 BLDE University bhoothanala bijapura Bijapur 3 Bhutnal 110

14 BLDE Association bhoothanala bijapura Bijapur 3 Bhutnal 110

15 Panchaksharaiah kolagunashi soraba shivamogga 1 Shrilkoppa 110

16 N Sushma Venkatapura Pavagada Tumkur 1 Madhugiri 220

17 Sridevi W/o. Gurappa Haladakeri bidar bidar 2 Habsikote 110

18 M Phanendra Babu siraguppa bellary Bellary 3 Siraguppa 110

19 Latha V Naik (M/s Venkat Energy) Thalavatti Hiriyur Chitradurga 3 Chitradurga 220

20 Waa Solar Private Limited_Tumkur1 Kolihal Yelburga Koppal 5 Bevoor 110

21 T Yathiraju (M/s Samyama Jyothi Energy Pvt Ltd) madanayakanahalli chitradurga Chitradurga 3 Chitradurga 220

Page 70: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

56 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity in

MW

Connected

substation

22 R D Seetharama Rao (M/s SolarFlux RDS Energy

LLP) kaparahalli challakere Chitradurga 1 Hiryur 220

23 B Somashekar thalavatti Hiriyur Chitradurga 3 Chitradurga 220

24 A V Nagaraja Reddy (Mepgen Solar Private Ltd) Dyamadavvanahalli Chithradurga Chitradurga 2 Chitradurga 220

25 Manasa Gaddikeri Hagaribommana

halli Bellary 3 Ittagi 220

26 Rejiya Saleem Gaddikeri Hagaridommana

halli, Bellary 3 Ittagi 220

27 Shrinath Malagi Gaddikeri Hagaridommana

halli Bellary 3 Ittagi 220

28 Latha Sandeep gaddikeri hagaridommana

halli Bellary 2 Ittagi 220

29 Ajith Kumar B Kuchnur bidar jamakhandi Bagalkot 1 Shirbur 110

30 Lakshimi Bai Sagareppa Dalawai halagani Babaleshwara Bijapur 1 Babaleshwar

110

31 Waa Solar Private Limited_Tumkur2 Kolihal Yelburga Koppal 5 Bevoor 110

32 G.Vishwanatha Reddy Lokikere kudligi Bellary 1 Ittagi 220

33 R.H.Jayaram Reddy Dalavayi hosa halli Bangarapete Kolar 3 Malur 220

34 Kallappa Lakshmappa Nyamagoudar Malali Mudhol Bagalkot 1 Hassan 220

35 Basavarajaiah (M/s Sunishka Solar ) Tungani Kanakapura Ramnagar 1 Kanakapura 220

36 Ramappa Sidappa Talewad jambagi.K.D Mudhol Bagalkot 1 Jambagi K D

110

37 Siddappa F Tigaddi Murgudu Savadatti, Belgaum 3 Saundatti 220

38 T Gowranna Kondlahally Molakalmuru Chitradurga 1 Thallak 220

39 Prakash Sindagi Athani Athani Belgaum 1 Athani 220

40 Girija B Hatiholi Madamagiri Savadathi Belgaum 3 Saundatti 220

41 Channaraj B HatiholiHattiholi Basargi KM Savadthi Belgaum 3 Saundatti 220

42 Rajashekar S Nadagouda Jalageri Bijapur Bijapur 3 Tekkalaki 110

43 Ulhas Siddramappa Arakeri Hunashyala Bijapura Bijapur 3 Atharga 110

44 RH Kasturi Dalavayi Hosa Halli Banagarpete Kolar 1 Malur 220

Page 71: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 57

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity in

MW

Connected

substation

45 R Lakshmidevamma Kaluve Challakere Chitradurga 2 Thallak 220

46 R Krishnappa Kaluve Challakere Chitradurga 2 Thallak 220

47 Raghu Infra Structure Pvt Ltd (Asian fabtec Ltd ) Bevinahalli &

Sankaour Sira Tumkur 3 Hiryur 220

48 United Telecoms Ltd (M/s United Surya Energy Pvt

Limited) Bandethimalapura

TalakuHobli,

Challakere taluk Chitradurga 3 Thallak 220

49 Emami Power Limited Neralakunte &

Dommathamri Pavagada Tumkur 10 Madhugiri 220

50 Azure Power India Private Limited Halagaladdi Hiryur Chitradurga 10 Hiryur 220

51 Interocean shipping pvt ltd Nagalamadike Pavagada Tumkur 3 Madhugiri 220

52 Clean MaxHarsh Solar LLP(SP) Tondihatti Madhugiri Tumkur 5.5 Madhugiri 220

53 Clean MaxHarsh Solar LLP(SP) Tondihatti Madhugiri Tumkur 5 Madhugiri 220

54 RNS infrastructure Vadrevu ,

naagalamadike hobli pavagada Tumkur 9 Madhugiri 220

55 Atria Power Corporation Ltd (IPP Solar thermal) Nelvagalu Ranibenuru Haveri 3 Shimoga 220

56 Atria Brindavan Power Private Ltd (M/s C.S.Sundar

Raju) Ryapte pavagada Tumkur 20 Madhugiri 220

57 Sharda Construction and Corporation Private Ltd Chatnal and Santpur Aurad Bidar 4 Santpur 110

58 Starkraft BLP Neralakunte pavagada Tumkur 4 Munirabad ph

220

59 Jindal Aluminium Ltd Bhavihallu mayakonda Davanagere 10 Chitradurga 220

60 Clean MaxHarsh Solar LLP(SP) Tondihatti Madhugiri Tumkur 13.88 Madhugiri 220

61 Kanva Diagnostic Services Pvt Ltd Halagalladi Hiriyur Chitradurga 1 Hiryur 220

62 Belagavi (KPCL) Itnal Chikodi Belgaum 3 Kerur 110

63 Kolar (KPCL) Yelasandra Bangarpet Kolar 3 Malur 220

64 Raichur (KPCL) Yapaladdini Raichur Raichur 3 Ganadhal 110

65 Mandya (KPCL) Shimshapura Belakwadi Mandya 5 T K Halli 220

66 Welspun Solar Kannada Private Ltd. - Molakalmuru Chitradurga 7 Thallak 220

67 K.K.Rao Green Energy Pvt Ltd Kodambal Humnabad Bidar 3 Chittaguppa 110

68 KBJNL (Bagalkot) Canal top Rampur Bagalkot Bagalkot 1 Rampur 110

Page 72: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

58 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity in

MW

Connected

substation

69 Mandya (KPCL) - Malavalli Mandya 10 T K Halli 220

70 Welspun Renewables Energy Pvt Ltd Rajapur Molakalmuru Chitradurga 34 Hiryur 220

71 Welspun Renewables Energy Pvt Ltd Rajapur Molakalmuru Chitradurga 50 Thallak 220

72 Bhoruka Power Corporation Ltd Kanajanahally Hiriyur Chitradurga 20 Hiryur 220

73 Asian fabtec Ltd Bevanahalli Sira Tumkur 5 Hiryur 220

74 Photon suryakiran Pvt Ltd (M/s. Today Green Power

Pvt. Ltd.) Varavu challakere Chitradurga 10 Thallak 220

75 Photon suryakiran Pvt Ltd (M/s. Today Green Power

Pvt. Ltd.) Neelagattanahatty Challakere Chitradurga 20 Thallak 220

76 Azure Sunrise Power Ltd (Azure power India Pvt Ltd Hulikunte Challakere Chitradurga 50 Hiryur 220

77 ESSEL Infrastructure Ltd. Nimbal Indi Bijapur 5 Indi 110

78 Azure Sunrise Power Ltd (Azure power India Pvt Ltd Golahalli Challakere Chitradurga 40 Hiryur 220

79 Azure Sunrise Power Ltd (Azure power India Pvt Ltd Kopparahalli Challakere Chitradurga 40 Hiryur 220

80 Photon suryakiran Pvt Ltd (M/s. Today Green Power

Pvt. Ltd.) Varavu Challakere Chitradurga 20 Thallak 220

81 Photon suryakiran Pvt Ltd (M/s. Today Green Power

Pvt. Ltd.) Varavu Challakere Chitradurga 10 Thallak 220

82 Kavit Industries Limited Hunasihal Yalburga Koppal 5 Bevoor 110

83 M/s. Surana Telecom and Power Limited (M/s

Celestail Solar Solutions Pvt Ltd)

Changamangathanaha

lli Challakere Chitradurga 10 Hiryur 220

84 Sun Edison Energy Holdings Singapore Pte Ltd Nayakanahatty Challakere Chitradurga 30 Thallak 220

85 Sun Edison Energy Holdings Singapore Pte Ltd

(M//s SEI Diamond Pvt Ltd) Nelagettanahatty Challakere Chitradurga 30 Thallak 220

86 Sun Edison Energy Holdings Singapore Pte Ltd (M/s

SEI Aditi Power Pvt Ltd) Nagalamadike Pavagada Tumkur 30 Madhugiri 220

87 Sun Edison Energy Holdings Singapore Pte Ltd (M/s

SEI Bheem Pvt Ltd) Pallavali Pavagada Tumkur 30 Madhugiri 220

88 ESSEL Infrastructure Ltd. Nimbal Indi Bijapur 5 Indi 110

89 Sun Edison Energy Holdings Singapore Pte Ltd (M/s

SEI Suryashakthi Power Pvt Ltd) Nagalamadike Pavagada Tumkur 30 Madhugiri 220

90 Asian fabtec Ltd Bevanahalli Sira Tumkur 10 Hiryur 220

Page 73: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 59

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity in

MW

Connected

substation

91 Renew Solar Power Pvt Ltd (Renew Wind energy

(Karnataka 3) Pvt Ltd) Ladha Bhalki Bidar 20 Ladha 110

92 Renew Solar Power Pvt Ltd [ M/s Tarun kiran

bhoomi pvt ltd] Kadaganchi Alland Kalburgi 20 Kadaganchi 110

93 Renew Solar Power Pvt Ltd ( Renew Agni Power Pvt

Ltd ) Tekkalakote Siraguppa Bellary 20 Tekkalkote 110

94 Renew Solar Power Pvt Ltd [Renew wind

energy(karnataka 4) pvt ltd] Nirna Humnabad Bidar 20

Manna-e-khelli

110

95 Jindal Aluminium Ltd Bhavihallu mayakonda Davanagere 10 Chitradurga 220

96 United Telecoms Limited Vijalapura Mulabagal Kolar 3 Kolar KP 220

97 M/s Chikku Energy Pvt Ltd (Srinivas Shetty Reg.No-

16) Devasamudra Molakalmuru Chitradurga 3 C R patna 220

98 Anupkumar.K. Hanchinal Byalavadagi Mundaragi Gadag 1 Mundargi 110

99 M/S Mallige Education Foundation Huralichikkanahalli Bengalure north Bengaluru 1 Peenya 220

100 M/s CBM Enterprise ltd (B Gopal Reddy Reg - no

134) Devasamudra Molakalmuru Chitradurga 3 C R patna 220

101 Sri Aruna Mougli (M/s Guttur Solar Power LLP Guttur Yelburga Koppal 1 Bevoor 110

102 Sri Veeranagouda S/o Rudragouda Patil (M/s VR

patil Vividh Vidyuth Nirman Pvt Ltd) Neljeri Yelburga Koppal 3 Bevoor 110

103 Sri Shekarappa S/o Erappa Kavaroor Halavarthy Koppal Koppal 1 Koppal 110

104 Sri Sharanagouda Patil Chandragiri Koppal Koppal 1 Munirabad ph

220

105 Smt Lakshmi Devi (M/s Chandragiri Power & Infra

LLP) Chandragiri Koppal Koppal 1

Munirabad ph

220

106 Sri T R Bheemaneedi (M/s Ramapriya Energy Pvt

Ltd) Nanivala Challakere Chitradurga 2 Chitradurga 220

107 Prema Vijeyendra Nagalamadike Pavagada Tumkur 1 Madhugiri 220

108 T Chandra Shekar (M/s Niketan Solar Solutions) Gaddigere Hagari bommana

halli Bellary 3 Ittagi 220

109 S L Nagaraj Shetty (M/s Sri Sai shivanagere solar

power pvt ltd) Kallukotte Sira Tumkur 1 Hiryur 220

Page 74: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

60 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity in

MW

Connected

substation

110 Ajit C Desai (Arete elena energy pvt ltd) Murgudu Savadatti Belgaum 3 Yaragatti 110

111 M. V. Subramanya (Sree Jnanakshi Renewable

Energy Pvt Ltd) Virajipura Malavalli Mandya 2

Vajamangala

220

112 B Lakshmi Bai (Ahaska Aryaa Solar ) Akkirampura kortagere Tumkur 1 Madhugiri 220

113 Tippamma (SGTRS Solar Power Pvt Ltd) Kampallisagar Challkere Chitradurga 3 Thallak 220

114 Hosamani Shekaraj (Green impact Solar Power

(Shirol) Pvt Ltd ) Shirola Mundargi Gadag 1 Mundargi 110

115 Welspun Solar Kannada Pvt Ltd Nagasamudra Molakalmuru Chitradurga 10 Thallak 220

116 Srikant b kabadi Betageri gadag gadag 1 Uppin Betagere

110

117 A V Anjaneya Prasad Honnakatti Bagalkot Bagalkot 1 Sigikere 110

118 M V Rajaiha (GORICH Energy pvt ltd) Mukkadahalli Chamarajanagara Chamarajanagara 1 C Rnagara 220

119 Ravikumar H (Saketh Solar Energy LLP) Gundegala Kolegala Chamarajanagara 3 Madhuvanahally

220

120 Suhas S (Suragi Power Pvt Ltd) Devanooru Nanjangoodu Mysore 2 Kadakola 220

121 V Muniraju (P.V.Power Pvt Ltd) Nagalamadike Pavagada Tumkur 1 Madhugiri 220

122 H S Mallikarjun (SS solar Energy) Hurasagundagi shahapura yadagiri 2 Khanapur MK

110

123 Bhoruka Power Corporation Limited Rangen halli Hiriyur Chitradurga 10 Hiryur 220

124 H G Jayalakshmi Kutavadi Hunasuru Mysore 1 Hootagalli 220

125 M Rammappa Katuvadi - Mysore 1 Hootagalli 220

126 Seetabai G Desai benakoppa gadag gadag 3 Uppin Betagere

110

127 Avvanneppa Sonnad (Ravateshwar solar pvt ltd) thodalabaagi jamakkandi Bagalkot 2 Todalbagi 110

128 Srinivas Khadaranagara Bidar Bidar 3 Halabarga 110

129 Ashok Kumar Nithasha Humnabad Bidar 3 Manna-e-khelli

110

130 P.Satyanarayana (Satyanarayana Power LLP) Bassapura Sindanooru Raichur 1 Dadesugur 110

131 P.Venkateswara Rao ( PVR Solar Energy LLP) Bassapura Sindanooru Raichur 2 Dadesugur 110

Page 75: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 61

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity in

MW

Connected

substation

132 Y.Vishnuvardhan Rao (Vishnu Vardhan Solar

Energy LLP) Maladini Sindanooru Raichur 2 Dadesugur 110

133 Y.Suryavathi (Suryavathi Energy LPP) Dhadesaguru Sindanooru Raichur 3 Dadesugur 110

134 Azure Power Karnataka Private Limited Halagalahaddi Hiriyur Chitradurga 10 Hiryur 220

135 P.Sudhakar (Sudhakar Power LLP) Bassapura Sindanooru Raichur 1 Dadesugur 110

136 P Krishnakumari (Krishnakumari Power LLP) Bassapura Sindanooru Raichur 1 Dadesugur 110

137 Deveindrappa Gouda M Biradar Gowdagere Shurapura Bagalkot 2 Shorapur 110

138 T G Yeriswamy Yarangalige Bellary Bellary 2 Kurugodu 110

139 Rayappa Poojari chikkalakki jamakhandi Bagalkot 1 Todalbagi 110

140 K.T.Hema Reddy Chithranayakana halli Challakere Chitradurga 2 Thallak 220

141 C L Lakshmana Reddy chikkanayakanahalli challakere Chitradurga 2 Thallak 220

142 T Laxman Reddy Chitranayakanahalli Challakere Chitradurga 2 Thallak 220

143 Hanji Fakirappa (Vinsol (Hubli) energy Pvt Ltd) Govanala Laksheshwara Gadag 2 Laxmeshwar

110

144 Girija Kamma (NT Power Projects Pvt Ltd) Rajeshwara basava kalyana bidar 2 Rajeshwar 110

145 Pristine Solar Park Pvt Ltd Oolvadi , kasaba

hobli Chintamani Chikkaballapura 3 Chintamani 220

Wind generation

Table 18: Details of wind generation as on March 31, 2017

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

1 Victory Glass And Industries Ltd Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.35 Guttal 110

2 R P G Telecom Ltd. Hanumasagar Kustagi Koppal 1.92 Hanamsagar

110

3 Jindal Aluminium Ltd. Madhakaripura Chitradurga Chitradurga 2.3 Chitradurga 220

4 Jindal Aluminium Ltd. Madhakaripura Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.84 Chitradurga 220

Page 76: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

62 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

5 ICICI Bank Ltd. Girgoan Chikkodi Belgaum 3 Chikkodi 110

6 Indo Wind Energy Ltd. Malasamudra Gadag Gadag 1.8 Gadag Road

110

7 Indo Wind Energy Ltd. Malasamudra Gadag Gadag 0.25 Gadag Road

110

8 Indo Wind Energy Ltd. Belathadi Gadag Gadag 0.4 Bellahatti 110

9 Indo Wind Energy Ltd. Belathadi Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

10 Indo Wind Energy Ltd. Belathadi Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

11 Indo Wind Energy Ltd. - Gadag Gadag 0.4 Gadag Road

110

12 Indo Wind Energy Ltd. Belathadi Gadag Gadag 0.4 Bellahatti 110

13 Indo Wind Energy Ltd. Belathadi Gadag Gadag 0.4 Bellahatti 110

14 BSES Limited Bharampura Holalkere Chitradurga 7.59 Chitradurga 220

15 ICICI Bank Ltd. Bharampura Chikkodi Belgaum 0.5 Chitradurga 220

16 Nuzveedu Seeds Limited, Biderekere Jagalur Davangere 3.75 Chitradurga 220

17 Topaz Investments Pvt. Ltd., Nandipura Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.2 Chitradurga 220

18 CEPCO Industries Pvt. Ltd. Kurumardigere &Kennedlu/ Chitradurga Chitradurga Chitradurga 3 Chitradurga 220

19 Dee Dee Enterprises, Nandipura/Chitradurga Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

20 Topaz Investments Pvt. Ltd., Nandipura/Chitradurga Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

21 CEPCO Industries Pvt. Ltd. Kurumardigere &Kennedlu/ Chitradurga Chitradurga Chitradurga 5.4 Chitradurga 220

22 Lovely Fragrances Bharampura/ Chitradurga Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

23 J.N.Investments & Trading

Compnay Pvt. Ltd. Nandipura/ Chitradurga Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

24 Manipal Academy of Higher

Education, Kurumardigere Chitradurga Chitradurga 3.75 Chitradurga 220

25 Indo Wind Energy Ltd. Kurumardigere Chitradurga Gadag 0.9 Chitradurga 220

26 Ghodawat Pan Masal Productrs

(India) Pvt. Ltd. Kenndlu,Nandipua & Doddapura Chitradurga Chitradurga 3.6 Chitradurga 220

27 Sanjay D Ghodawat Nandipua Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

28 Encon Service Ltd., (NEG) Chikkasiddavvanahalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 3 Chitradurga 220

Page 77: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 63

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

29 Prabhat Agri- Bitech Pvt. Ltd.

(NEG) Chikkasiddavvanahalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.75 Chitradurga 220

30 Enercon Windfarms (India) Ltd., Kenndlu,Chitradurga Chitradurga Chitradurga 4.2 Chitradurga 220

31 Savitha Chemicals Ltd.(NEG) Chikkasiddavvanahalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.75 Chitradurga 220

32 Ghodawat Pan Masal Productrs

(India) Pvt. Ltd. Kenndlu, Nandipua& Doddapura Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.8 Chitradurga 220

33 Prime Lable (P) Ltd., -PWL Kurumardigere Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.25 Chitradurga 220

34 Jindal Aluminium Ltd.-EIL NandanaHosur Holalkere Chitradurga 3 Chitradurga 220

35 Mohite & Mohite (engineers &

Contractor), NandanaHosur Holalkere Chitradurga 2.4 Chitradurga 220

36 Texmo Industries NandanaHosur & Horakeredevarapura Holalkere Chitradurga 1.8 Chitradurga 220

37 Shriram Investments Ltd. Budipura / Nakikere Holalkere Chitradurga 4.2 Chitradurga 220

38 Shriram Transport Finance Co.

Ltd. Budipura / Gundikere Holalkere Chitradurga 4.2 Chitradurga 220

39 Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. Budipura / Gundikere Holalkere Chitradurga 1.8 Chitradurga 220

40 Jindal Aluminium Ltd.-EIL NandanaHosur Holalkere Chitradurga 2.4 Chitradurga 220

41 Jindal Aluminium Ltd-EIL NandanaHosur Holalkere Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

42 MSPL Ltd.-1 (NEG) G.R.Halli/Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.95 Chitradurga 220

43 Kamal Trading Co., Pvt. Ltd., Madakaripura Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.23 Chitradurga 220

44 Sharp Pumps Pvt Ltd., Madakaripura Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.23 Chitradurga 220

45 Mayura Steels Pvt Ltd., Madakaripura Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.23 Chitradurga 220

46 RSM Autokast Ltd., Madakaripura Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.46 Chitradurga 220

47 Rajinikanth Foundation, Madakaripura Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.23 Chitradurga 220

48 VXL Systems. Madakaripura Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.46 Chitradurga 220

49 Shilpa Medicare Limited Madakaripura Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.46 Chitradurga 220

50 Nuzveedu Seeds Limited, Biderekere Jagalur Davangere 8.25 Chitradurga 220

51 Texmo Precision Castings. Madakaripura Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.2 Chitradurga 220

52 Dee Dee Enterprises, Mathighatta (jogimatti in Wind zone) Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

53 Royal Energy Company, Thalya (Jogimatti in Wind Zone) Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

Page 78: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

64 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

54 Siddaganga Oil Extractions Ltd., Mathighatta (jogimatti in Wind zone) Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.2 Chitradurga 220

55 Fiza Developers & Inter-Trade Pvt.

Ltd,

Mathighatta and Thalya (jogimatti in Wind

zone) Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.2 Chitradurga 220

56 CEPCO Industries Pvt. Ltd. Kumminaghatta (Jogimatti in Wind Zone Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

57 Ghodawat Pan Masala Products (I)

Pvt Ltd.,

Janakal and Janakal (Jogimatti Wind

Zone) Chitradurga Chitradurga 5.4 Chitradurga 220

58 Panama Business centre, Kumminaghatta (Jogimatti Wind Zone) Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

59 Suttati Enterprises Pvt Ltd., Kumminaghatta (Jogimatti Wind Zone) Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.2 Chitradurga 220

60 Jindal Aluminium Ltd.-EIL Kumminaghatta (Jogimatti Wind Zone) Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

61 Friends associate Power Projects. Madakaripura Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.23 Chitradurga 220

62 Supreme Power Company Mattighatta/ Holakere Holalkere Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

63 Enercon Windfarms (India) Ltd., Yarehalli, Thekalavatti &Kolahalu Chitradurga Chitradurga 7.2 Chitradurga 220

64 Elveety Industries Ltd. Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.5 Chitradurga 220

65 NEG Micon (I) Pvtl. Ltd G.R.Halli/Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 3.8 Chitradurga 220

66 BSES Limited Gundikere & Budhuipura Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.8 Chitradurga 220

67 Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd Biderekere Jagalur Davangere 4.75 Chitradurga 220

68 Panama Credit & Capital Pvt. Ltd. Horakeredevarapura Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

69 Balasaheb M. Ladkat Horakeredevarapura Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

70 Shilpa Medicare Limited Kumminaghati Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

71 Enercon Windfarms (India) Ltd., Yarehalli, Thekalavatti &Kolahalu Chitradurga Chitradurga 13.8 Chitradurga 220

72 Pallavi Green Power (FIZA) Kanchignhal Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.75 Chitradurga 220

73 Nuzveedu Seeds Limited, Biderekere Jagalur Davangere 1.9 Chitradurga 220

74 Ramgad Mineral and mining Pvt.

Ltd-1 (NEG) G.R.Halli/ Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.9 Chitradurga 220

75 MSPL--2 (NEG) GRHalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 4.75 Chitradurga 220

76 Associate Autotex Ancillaries (P)

Ltd., Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

77 Sanja D Ghodawat (HUF) Kennedlu, Nandipura Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

Page 79: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 65

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

78 Shardha Constructions Enginners

and Contractors Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 4.2 Chitradurga 220

79 VXL Systems. Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

80 Star Flexi Pack Industries Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

81 Sanjay D Ghodawat (Individual) Kennedlu, Nandipura Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

82 Ghodawat pan Masala products (I)

Pvt., Ltd., Kennedlu, Nandipura Chitradurga Chitradurga 4.2 Chitradurga 220

83 CEPCO Industries Pvt. Ltd. Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 1.2 Chitradurga 220

84 MSPL Ltd. Jogimatti Chitradurga Chitradurga 3.75 Chitradurga 220

85 Prime Labels Ltd. - PWL Palavanahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.64 Chitradurga 220

86 Suresh Productions(FIZA) G.R.Halli Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.75 Chitradurga 220

87 MSPL-7 (NEG) Chikapanahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 2.85 Chitradurga 220

88 MSPL Jogimatti Chitradurga Chitradurga 2.5 Chitradurga 220

89 MSPL-5 (FIZA) G.R.Halli Chitradurga Chitradurga 2.25 Chitradurga 220

90 MSPL-4 G.R.Halli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

91 Eswari Garements (FIZA) G.R.Halli Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.75 Chitradurga 220

92 Esawi knittings (FIZA) G.R.Halli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

93 Sanghvi Movers Ltd., (FIZA) G.R.Halli Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.75 Chitradurga 220

94 MSPL-8 (FIZA) G.R.Halli Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.95 Chitradurga 220

95 Eswari Textiles (FIZA) G.R.Halli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

96

Shraddha Constructions & Power

Generation (P) Ltd., (Formerly

Shardha Constructions Enginners

and Contractors)

Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

97 Madras Cements Ltd., Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

98 Madras Cements Ltd., Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

99 Associated Autotex Ancillaries (P)

Ltd., Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

100 Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd. Jagalur Jagalur Davangere 6 Chitradurga 220

Page 80: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

66 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

101 B.S.C.Textiles Cloth Merchants, Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Hiryur 220

102 Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd.7 Jagalur Jagalur Davangere 3 Chitradurga 220

103 B.S.Chanabasappa and sons., Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Hiryur 220

104 Meghna Automotives Pvt. Ltd. Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Hiryur 220

105 MSPL-5 (FIZA) G.R.Halli/ Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

106 MSPL-4 G.R.Halli/ Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 2.85 Chitradurga 220

107 MSPL-8 (FIZA) G.R.Halli/ Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.95 Chitradurga 220

108 Eswari Textiles (FIZA) G.R.Halli/ Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

109 Victus Associate (FIZA) G.R.Halli/ Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.75 Chitradurga 220

110 Patel Shanti Steels Pvt. Ltd, Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Hiryur 220

111 P.Vijay Kumar., Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Hiryur 220

112

Rohit surfactants Pvt Ltd.,

(Formerly Shri Mahadeo Soap

Industries Pvt. Ltd., )

Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 3 Hiryur 220

113 Cooper Foundary (P) Ltd., Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 1.2 Hiryur 220

114 Primtex Apparels India (P) Ltd., Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Hiryur 220

115 Rajesh Construction Company Kurumardikere Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.25 Chitradurga 220

116 Ferromar Shipping (P) Ltd., Kurumardikere Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.25 Chitradurga 220

117 Gangadhar Naringadas Agarwal

(HUF) Kurumardikere Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.25 Chitradurga 220

118 Cooper Foundary (P) Ltd., Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 1.2 Hiryur 220

119 Rajesh Construction Company Kurumardikere Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.25 Chitradurga 220

120 Mineral Enterprises Ltd., Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 1.2 Hiryur 220

121 World Institute of Sustainable

Energy Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 1.2 Hiryur 220

122

Rohit surfactants Pvt Ltd.,

(Formerly Shri Mahadeo Soap

Industries Pvt. Ltd., )

Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 3 Hiryur 220

123 Enercon Windfarms (Krishna)

Ltd., Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 15 Guttal 110

Page 81: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 67

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

124 MSPL-2 Jogimatti Chitradurga Chitradurga 5 Chitradurga 220

125 Mantri Developer Jogimatti Chitradurga Chitradurga 3.75 Chitradurga 220

126 Amitronics Jogimatti Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.25 Chitradurga 220

127 Navalakhas Travles Jogimatti Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.25 Chitradurga 220

128 SE Investements Vanivilasagar Hiriyur Chitradurga 2.4 Hiryur 220

129 Shri Jintendra D Majethia Vanivilasagar Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Hiryur 220

130 Unnathi Projects Vanivilasagar Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Hiryur 220

131 Patel Shanti Steels Pvt. Ltd, Vanivilasagar Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Hiryur 220

132 Brindavan Agro Industries (P)

Ltd., Vanivilasagar Hiriyur Chitradurga 1.2 Hiryur 220

133 Gem Crafts Vanivilasagar Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Hiryur 220

134 Enercon Windfarms (India) Ltd., Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 3.2 Guttal 110

135 Ramgad Minerals & Mining Pvt.

Ltd, Sogi Huvinahadagalli Bellary 7.5 Ittagi 220

136 P.Venganna Setty & Bros. Sogi Huvinahadagalli Bellary 7.5 Ittagi 220

137 MSPL Sogi Huvinahadagalli Bellary 5 Ittagi 220

138 Jivraj Tea Ltd., Jogimatti Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.25 Chitradurga 220

139 Abishek Exports Jogimatti Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.25 Chitradurga 220

140 Sanjana Powers Jogimatti Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.25 Chitradurga 220

141 International conveyors Vanivilasagar Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Hiryur 220

142 IGE India Vanivilasagar Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Hiryur 220

143 Unnathi Projects Vanivilasagar Hiriyur Chitradurga 1.8 Hiryur 220

144 Amrith Bottlers Vanivilasagar Hiriyur Chitradurga 1.2 Hiryur 220

145 Sanjana power Vanivilasagar Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Hiryur 220

146 Shilpa Medicare Limited Vanivilasagar Hiriyur Chitradurga 1.2 Hiryur 220

147 Swaraj Pipes Vanivilasagar Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Hiryur 220

148 MSPL Jajikalgudda Harpanahalli Davangere 16.25 Ittagi 220

Page 82: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

68 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

149 Ramgad Minerals & Mining Pvt.

Ltd, Jajikalgudda Harpanahalli Davangere 10 Ittagi 220

150 MSPL Jajikalgudda Harpanahalli Davangere 2.5 Ittagi 220

151 Maris Power Supply Company

Ltd.,(FIZA) Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 5.25 Chitradurga 220

152 Bellary Iron Works Pvt.,

Ltd.,(CWEL) G.R.Halli/ Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.95 Chitradurga 220

153 S.Kumar (CWEL) G.R.Halli/ Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.95 Chitradurga 220

154 Savitha chemicals Ltd.(CWEL) G.R.Halli/ Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.9 Chitradurga 220

155 Bellad and Company (CWEL) G.R.Halli/ Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.95 Chitradurga 220

156 MKAgrotech Vanivilasagar Hiriyur Chitradurga 1.2 Hiryur 220

157 Peenya Power Company (P) Ltd., Betadarangenahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.5 Chitradurga 220

158 Peenya Power Company (P) Ltd., Bettedanagenahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.5 Chitradurga 220

159 Ramgad Minerals & Mining

Pvt.Ltd-4 Jajikalgudda Harpanahalli Davangere 6.25 Ittagi 220

160 MSPL Limited-6 Jajikalgudda Harpanahalli Davangere 1.25 Ittagi 220

161 Ramgad Minerals & Mining

Pvt.Ltd-3 Jajikalgudda Harpanahalli Davangere 1.25 Ittagi 220

162 MSPL Limited-6 Jajikalgudda Harpanahalli Davangere 1.25 Ittagi 220

163 Ramgad Minerals & Mining

Pvt.Ltd-4 Jajikalgudda Harpanahalli Davangere 3.75 Ittagi 220

164 Bellary Iron Ores Co.Pvt.Limited

(NEG) Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.95 Chitradurga 220

165 Savitha Chemicals Limited

(CWEL) Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.9 Chitradurga 220

166 Ramgad Minerals & Mining

Pvt.Ltd-3 Jajikalgudda Harpanahalli Davangere 2.5 Ittagi 220

167 Bellad and Company (CWEL) Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.95 Chitradurga 220

168 Mysore Mercantile Company Ltd., Mattighatta Holalkere Chitradurga 1.6 Chitradurga 220

169 Mysore Mercantile Company Ltd., Mattighatta Holalkere Chitradurga 2.4 Chitradurga 220

170 Mysore Mercantile Company Ltd., Mattighatta Holalkere Chitradurga 0.8 Chitradurga 220

Page 83: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 69

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

171 Abletech Electro Engineers Pvt.

Ltd., Mattighatta Holalkere Chitradurga 1.6 Chitradurga 220

172 CBM Corporation MMCL Mattighatta Holalkere Chitradurga 0.8 Chitradurga 220

173 Mineral Enterprises Ltd., (MMCL) Mattighatta Holalkere Chitradurga 2.4 Chitradurga 220

174 Avanthi FeedsLtd., Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 3.2 Hiryur 220

175 Srinivasa Cystine Ltd., Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

176 B V Finanace & Leasing LTd., Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

177 Jubilee Textile Mills Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

178 RDS Construction Company Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

179 Brindavan Agro Industries Ltd., Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

180 Neharaj Enegry Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

181 Mark Data Power & Energy Ltd., Gujanur Huvinahadagalli Bellary 1.25 Ittagi 220

182 VSL Mining Company Gujanur Huvinahadagalli Bellary 6.25 Ittagi 220

183 Siddhayu Ayurvedic Resarch

Foundation (P) Ltd., Gujanur Huvinahadagalli Bellary 2.5 Ittagi 220

184 VSL Mining Company Gujanur Huvinahadagalli Bellary 2.5 Ittagi 220

185 Srinivasa Cystine Ltd., Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

186 Vandana Global Ltd., Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

187 Vanadana Rolling Mills Ltd., Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

188 Vivek Trading Company Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

189 Brindavan Agro Industries Ltd., Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 2.4 Hiryur 220

190 Amrit Bottlers Pvt Ltd., Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

191 Vivek Pharma Chem India Ltd., Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

192 R S Suriya Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

193 MSPL-5 Sogi Huvinahadagalli Bellary 1.25 Ittagi 220

194 India Power Corporation Ltd., Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 4.8 Hiryur 220

195 India Power Corporation Ltd., Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 2.4 Hiryur 220

196 Treveni Enterprises Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Guttal 110

Page 84: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

70 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

197 Research Development and

Manufactuering corporation Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Guttal 110

198 BSK Trading Inc Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Guttal 110

199 Shakhambari Enterprises Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Guttal 110

200 E. Rammurthy Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Guttal 110

201 Ensemble Infrasturuce India Ltd., Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Guttal 110

202 Allegro Ventures India (P) Ltd., Gujunur Huvinahadagalli Bellary 1.25 Ittagi 220

203 Visva Vishal Engineering Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Guttal 110

204 Dempo Industries Pvt LTd., Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

205 Srinivasa Sririgieri Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

206 Ushdev International Ltd., Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 1.6 Hiryur 220

207 Dinesh Prouches Ltd., Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

208 Desai Brotehrs Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

209 R K Marbles Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

210 Ramco Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 0.33 Hiryur 220

211 Ghodawat Industires (P) Ltd., Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 5.6 Hiryur 220

212 India Power Corporation Ltd., Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 3.2 Hiryur 220

213 D R Container Terminal Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 1.6 Hiryur 220

214 Prasad Technology Park Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 1.6 Hiryur 220

215 Unnathi Project Ltd., Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

216 Mumbai Stcok Brokers Pvt LTd., Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

217 Siddganga Oil Extraction Ltd., Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 1.6 Hiryur 220

218 Cavery Coffee Traders Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

219 Gemcraft Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

220 Madras Cements Ltd., Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 4.8 Hiryur 220

221 Lovely Fragrances Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

222 Ramco Industries Ltd., Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 1.6 Hiryur 220

Page 85: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 71

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

223 M K Agro tech Pvt LTd., Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 1.6 Hiryur 220

224 Sameer Ladkat Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

225 Gautham Ladkat Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

226 Panama Infrastructer Pvt LTd., Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 1.6 Hiryur 220

227 Balasaheb M. Ladkat Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 1.6 Hiryur 220

228 Panama Business Centre Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 1.6 Hiryur 220

229 Devchand Ramsaran Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

230 Mineral Project Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 4 Hiryur 220

231 Mineral Project Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 5.6 Hiryur 220

232 Elpro Instruments Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

233 Steelfabs Oversees Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

234 Enercon wind farms (Chitradurga)

Pvt Ltd., Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 4 Hiryur 220

235 Bellary Iron Ores Pvt Ltd., Channagiri Chennagiri Davangere 4.2 Bus_WI_Guttur

220

236 Bellary Iron Ores Pvt Ltd., Channagiri Chennagiri Davangere 0.5 Bus_WI_Guttur

220

237 VS Lad & Sons Channagiri Chennagiri Davangere 1.2 Bus_WI_Guttur

220

238 Y.Mahabaleswarappa &Sons Channagiri Chennagiri Davangere 1.2 Bus_WI_Guttur

220

239 R.B.Seth Shreeram Naringdas Channagiri Chennagiri Davangere 2.4 Bus_WI_Guttur

220

240 V.T.Switchgears & Transforms Channagiri Chennagiri Davangere 0.6 Bus_WI_Guttur

220

241 MSPL Ltd., Channagiri Chennagiri Davangere 6 Bus_WI_Guttur

220

242 P.Venganna Setty & Bros. Channagiri Chennagiri Davangere 0.6 Bus_WI_Guttur

220

243 V M Salgocar & Bros (P) Ltd., Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 3.75 Guttal 110

244 Indian Wind Energy Association Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Guttal 110

Page 86: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

72 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

245 Vandana Global Ltd., Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Guttal 110

246 Nav Baharat Intenational Ltd., Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Guttal 110

247 Ramesh Kumar Hajarimal Rathod Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Guttal 110

248 Globle Trasnsport Co. Ltd., Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Guttal 110

249 Unnathi Projects Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

250 Enercon Wind Farms (Chitradurga)

Ltd., Bharampura village Chitradurga Chitradurga 4.8 Hiryur 220

251 Indan Energy Pvt. Ltd Kanchiganal Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.95 Chitradurga 220

252 VSL Mining Company (P) Ltd., Kalkeri Mundargi Gadag 3.75 Guttal 110

253 VS Lad & Sons Kalkeri Mundargi Gadag 3.75 Guttal 110

254 VSL Mining Projects (P) Ltd., Mattikoppa Mundargi Gadag 2.5 Guttal 110

255 BSK Trading Inc Mattikoppa Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Guttal 110

256 Enercon Windfarms (Krishna)

Ltd., Hirevadatti Mundargi Gadag 2.4 Dambal 110

257 VSL Mining Company (P) Ltd., Kalkeri Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Guttal 110

258 E Ramamurthy Keluru Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Guttal 110

259 Vijayananda Road Lines Ltd.,

(Phase-2) Hirevadatti Mundargi Gadag 10 Dambal 110

260 VS Lad & Sons Kalkeri Mundargi Gadag 2.5 Guttal 110

261 VSL Mining Company (P) Ltd., Kalkeri Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Guttal 110

262 Shakhambari Enterprises Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

263 Happy Valley Developers Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

264 MPR Widn Farms Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

265 Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 3.75 Dambal 110

266 Revathi Raju Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

267 Enercon WindFarms (Hindustan)

(P) Ltd.,JNI Chikkabyladakere Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 20.8 Hiryur 220

268 Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

269 Revathi Raju Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

Page 87: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 73

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

270 Bhagyanagar India Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 2.5 Dambal 110

271 Bhagyanagar India Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 2.5 Dambal 110

272 Bharat Electronics Ltd., Chennagiri Chennagiri Davangere 2.5 Bus_WI_Guttur

220

273 Pragathi Aroma Oil Distillers (P)

Ltd., Chennagiri Chennagiri Davangere 1.2

Bus_WI_Guttur

220

274 Sanjay D Ghodawat Chennagiri Chennagiri Davangere 4.2 Bus_WI_Guttur

220

275 Enercon WindFarms (Hindustan)

(P) Ltd.,JNI Dusudi Hosadurga Chitradurga 3.2 Hiryur 220

276 Enercon WindFarms (Hindustan)

(P) Ltd.,JNI Chikkabyladakere Hosadurga Tumkur 4 Hiryur 220

277 Enercon Wiind Farms (Hindustan)

(P) Ltd., - JNI

Dasudi & Chickabaladikere Gollarahatti,

Somanahalli & Thimmapanahalli Hosadurga Tumkur 16.8 Hiryur 220

278 Prasad Global Solutions Majjur Shiratti Gadag 0.8 Shirhatti 110

279 M K Agrotech (P) Ltd., Majjur Shiratti Gadag 0.8 Shirhatti 110

280 VXL Systems Majjur Shiratti Gadag 0.8 Shirhatti 110

281 Cavery Coffee Traders Machinalli Shiratti Gadag 0.8 Bellahatti 110

282 Gangadhar Narsingdas Agarwal Majjur Shiratti Gadag 2.4 Shirhatti 110

283 Gangadhar Narsingdas Agarwal Machenahalli & Ranathur village in

Shirahatti Shiratti Gadag 1.6 Shirhatti 110

284 Abhilash Garments and Estates (P)

Ltd., Machenahalli village in Shirahatti Shiratti Gadag 0.8 Shirhatti 110

285 Siddaganga Oil Extractions Ltd., Machenahalli & Ranathur village in

Shirahatti Shiratti Gadag 1.6 Shirhatti 110

286 Vikram Traders Machenahalli village in Shirahatti Shiratti Gadag 0.8 Shirhatti 110

287 Siddaganga Oil Extraction Ltd., Machinalli Mundargi Gadag 0.8 Bellahatti 110

288 Kaleesuwari Refinery (P) Ltd., Machinalli Mundargi Gadag 0.8 Bellahatti 110

289 Jindal Steels Ltd. Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

290 Mukund Kamath S Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

291 Kashyap J Majethia Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

Page 88: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

74 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

292 Bharathi P Holkunde Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

293 Magnum Intergrafiks (P) Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

294 Sanjay Ghodawat - (SA) Gajendragarh Ron Gadag 5.4 Gajendragad

110

295 MMTC Ltd., Gajendragarh Ron Gadag 4.8 Gajendragad

110

296 MMTC Ltd., Gajendragarh Ron Gadag 4.8 Gajendragad

110

297 MMTC Ltd., Gajendragarh Ron Gadag 2.4 Gajendragad

110

298 Revathi Raju Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

299 VRL Logistics Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

300 VRL Logistics Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

301 VRL Logistics Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

302 VRL Logistics Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

303 Vikram Traders - LMIL Timmanahalli, Ramanahalli, Annehalli,

Hagalvadi and mattikere Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 0.8 Hiryur 220

304 Compucom Software Ltd.,- LMIL Timmanahalli, Ramanahalli, Annehalli,

Hagalvadi and mattikere Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 0.8 Hiryur 220

305 Chandulal Surajmal- LMIL Timmanahalli, Ramanahalli, Annehalli,

Hagalvadi and mattikere Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 0.8 Hiryur 220

306 G. Shoe Exports- LMIL Timmanahalli, Ramanahalli, Annehalli,

Hagalvadi and mattikere Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 0.8 Hiryur 220

307 International conveyors Ltd.,-

LMIL

Timmanahalli, Ramanahalli, Annehalli,

Hagalvadi and mattikere Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 0.8 Hiryur 220

308 Arts & Crafts Exports- LMIL Timmanahalli, Ramanahalli, Annehalli,

Hagalvadi and mattikere Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 0.8 Hiryur 220

309 I.G.E. India Ltd., - LMIL Timmanahalli, Ramanahalli, Annehalli,

Hagalvadi and mattikere Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 0.8 Hiryur 220

Page 89: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 75

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

310 Mayura Steels Pvt Ltd., - LMIL Timmanahalli, Ramanahalli, Annehalli,

Hagalvadi and mattikere Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 0.8 Hiryur 220

311 Shilpa Medicare Limited - LMIL Timmanahalli, Ramanahalli, Annehalli,

Hagalvadi and mattikere Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 1.6 Hiryur 220

312 S. Kumar - LMIL Timmanahalli, Ramanahalli, Annehalli,

Hagalvadi and mattikere Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 0.8 Hiryur 220

313 Shreem Capacitors (P) Ltd., -

LMIL

Timmanahalli, Ramanahalli, Annehalli,

Hagalvadi and mattikere Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 1.6 Hiryur 220

314 Arathi V Patil Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

315 Vinay Patil Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

316 VRL Logistics Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 2.5 Dambal 110

317 VRL Logistics Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 3.75 Dambal 110

318 VRL Logistics Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 13.75 Dambal 110

319 VRL Logistics Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 5 Dambal 110

320 Magma Leasing Limited Devanakatti village Raybag Belgaum 4.95 Kabbur 110

321 Walden Properties (P) Ltd., Devanakatti village Raybag Belgaum 1.65 Kabbur 110

322 Sanjay Ghodawat - (SA) Gajendragarh Ron Gadag 5.4 Gajendragad

110

323 MMTC Ltd., Gajendragarh Ron Gadag 3 Gajendragad

110

324 Lovely Fragrances - (SA) Gajendragarh Ron Gadag 0.6 Gajendragad

110

325 Pragathi Aroma Distilleries (P)

Ltd., - (SA) Gajendragarh Ron Gadag 0.6

Gajendragad

110

326 Mac Charles (India) Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.5 Dambal 110

327 Bhagyanagar India Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 2.5 Dambal 110

328 Manoj V Telisara Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

329 Vikram Traders - SEL Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.5 Dambal 110

330 Bhagyanagar India Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.5 Dambal 110

331 Surana Telecom Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

Page 90: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

76 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

332 V M Salgocar Sales International Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

333 V M Salgocar & Bros (P) Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

334 Nu-Tech Associates Billenahalli Arasikere Hassan 1.5 Arasikere 110

335 Nu- Tech Prasiddhi Consortium Billenahalli Arasikere Hassan 1.5 Arasikere 110

336 Walden Properties (P) Ltd., - SEL Billenahalli Arasikere Hassan 1.5 Arasikere 110

337 V M Salgocar & Bros (P) Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 3.75 Dambal 110

338 V M Salgocar Sales International Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

339 Sapthagiri Distilleries (P) Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 3 Dambal 110

340 Enercon (India) Ltd., Mundergi Mundargi Gadag 6 Dambal 110

341 Sapthagiri Distilleries (P) Ltd., Rangapurakavalu Arasikere Hassan 3 Arasikere 110

342 V.M.Salgaokar & Bros. (P) Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 5 Dambal 110

343 Sree Devi Chemicals Chikkanayakanahalli Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 0.8 C N Hally 110

344 Triveni Enterprises Chikkanayakanahalli Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 0.8 C N Hally 110

345 Texmo Precision Castings Chikkanayakanahalli Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 1.6 C N Hally 110

346 V.M.Salgaokar Sales Inetrnational Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

347 U D Foundation Chikkanayakanahalli Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 0.8 C N Hally 110

348 Happy Valley Developers Chikkanayakanahalli Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 0.8 C N Hally 110

349 Texonic Instruments Chikkanayakanahalli Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 0.8 C N Hally 110

350 Bharath Petroleum Corporation

Ltd., Kappatgudda Mundargi Gadag 5 Dambal 110

351 R.B.Seth Sreeram Narasingdas Chikkanayakanahalli Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 0.8 C N Hally 110

352 Protectron Electromech (P) Ltd., Chikkanayakanahalli Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 0.8 C N Hally 110

353 VXL Systems Chikkanayakanahalli Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 0.8 C N Hally 110

354 Enercon (India) Ltd., Singatalur Mundargi Gadag 5.4 Dambal 110

355 Energy Development CO Ltd., Rangapurakavalu Arasikere Hassan 1.5 Arasikere 110

356 Mac charles India ltd., Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.5 Dambal 110

357 Indian designs Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.5 Dambal 110

Page 91: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 77

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

358 Vikram Traders Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.5 Dambal 110

359 B.D.Patel and Company Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

360 Simran wind project (P) Ltd.,

(Suzlon Towers) Rangapurakavalu Arasikere Hassan 7.5 Arasikere 110

361 Simran wind project (P) Ltd.,

(Rambhaben Ukabhai) Rangapurakavalu Arasikere Hassan 1.5 Arasikere 110

362 Renaissance Holdings and

developers (P) Ltd Rangapurakavalu Arasikere Hassan 1.5 Arasikere 110

363 Renaissance Holdings and

developers (P) Ltd Rangapurakavalu Arasikere Hassan 3 Arasikere 110

364 Ramco Industries Ltd., Rangapurakavalu Arasikere Hassan 1.5 Arasikere 110

365 Keerthi industries Ltd. Rangapurakavalu Arasikere Hassan 1.5 Arasikere 110

366 Bhoruka Power Corporation

Limited Nargund Nargund Gadag 7.2 Nargund 110

367 Hindustan Zinc Limited Kurthkoti, Harti Gadag Gadag 4 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

368 Generacion Eolica India (P) Ltd Harti Gadag Gadag 3.2 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

369 Bharat Earth Movers Limited Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

370 Bharat Earth Movers Limited Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

371 Bharat Earth Movers Limited Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

372 Enercon (India) Ltd., Singatalur, Kolahalli Mundargi Gadag 11.4 Shirhatti 110

373 Ranka N Ranka Jogimatti Chitradurga Chitradurga 5 Chitradurga 220

374 Sridevi Trading Company Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

375 B.S.C.Textiles Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

376 B.S.Channabasappa & Sons, Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.675 Bellahatti 110

377 Sree Channeshwara Rice

Industries, Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

378 Daksh Minerals & Marine (P) Ltd., Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.45 Bellahatti 110

379 B.C. & Sons, Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

Page 92: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

78 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

380 Sree Channeshwara Drier, Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

381 Associated Stone Idnustries

(Kotah) Ltd., Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 1.125 Bellahatti 110

382 Ranjeet Bullion, Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

383 Bedmutha Wire Company Limited, Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

384 S.K.Sridhar, Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

385 S. K.Shashidhar, Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

386 Shri Swami Samarth Engineers, Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

387 Generacion Eolica India (P) Ltd Harti Gadag Gadag 4.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

388 S.C. Shettar & Sons Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

389 Swarana Construction Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

390 Kmmi Steel (P) Ltd., Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.5 Dambal 110

391 Khatau Narbheram & Co (Phase-1) Aidahalli kaval Belur Hassan 1.5 Chikamagalur

220

392 Khatau Narbheram & Co (Phase-2) Aidahalli kaval Belur Hassan 1.5 Chikamagalur

220

393 Khatau Narbheram & Co (Phase-3) Aidahalli kaval Belur Hassan 1.5 Chikamagalur

220

394 Bharat Electronic Limited Aidahalli kaval Belur Hassan 1.5 Chikamagalur

220

395 Bharat Electronic Limited Aidahalli kaval Belur Hassan 1.5 Chikamagalur

220

396 Gangadhar Narasingdas Agarwal Ayyanahalli Bellary Bellary 1.5 Sankalapur 110

397 Gangadhar Narasingdas Agarwal Ayyanahalli Bellary Bellary 1.5 Sankalapur 110

398 Gangadhar Narasingdas Agarwal Ayyanahalli Bellary Bellary 1.5 Sankalapur 110

399 Ramesh Ayyanahalli Bellary Bellary 1.5 Sankalapur 110

400 Indo wind Energy Ltd., Elkurnahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

401 Indo wind Energy Ltd., Elkurnahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

402 Indo wind Energy Ltd., Elkurnahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

Page 93: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 79

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

403 Indo wind Energy Ltd., Elkurnahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

404 Indo wind Energy Ltd., Elkurnahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

405 Allum Veerabhadrappa Elekuranahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

406 VS Lad & Sons Elekuranahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

407 Swarna Properties Thimmappanagudda Raybag Belgaum 1.65 Donimalali 110

408 The Chennai Silks Aidahalli kaval Belur Hassan 1.25 Chikamagalur

220

409 Mukund Kamath.S Aidahalli kaval Belur Hassan 1.25 Chikamagalur

220

410 Emkay Taps Aidahalli kaval Belur Hassan 1.25 Chikamagalur

220

411 DLF Limited Harti Gadag Gadag 11.2 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

412 Hindustan Zinc Limited Kurthkoti, Harti Gadag Gadag 6.4 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

413 Sai krishna Minera;s (P) Ltd., Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.5 Dambal 110

414 ILC Industries Ltd., Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.5 Dambal 110

415 Dr. Madura C. Venkatapura Gadag Gadag 0.25 Mundargi 110

416 Dr.Chandu. G.N Venkatapura Gadag Gadag 0.25 Mundargi 110

417 Ercon Composites Venkatapura Gadag Gadag 0.5 Mundargi 110

418 Mysore Engineers (India) Pvt. Ltd., Venkatapura Gadag Gadag 0.25 Mundargi 110

419 G.N.Chandu (HUF) Venkatapura Gadag Gadag 0.25 Mundargi 110

420 Prasanna K Giriayapur Venkatapura Gadag Gadag 0.25 Mundargi 110

421 Shree Krishna Minerals Venkatapura Gadag Gadag 0.5 Mundargi 110

422 Shriram EPC Limited - PWPL Palavanahalli, Kurumardikere &

Chikkasiddavanahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.35 Chitradurga 220

423 Fairdel Supplies Pvt Ltd-PWPL Palavanahalli, Kurumardikere &

Chikkasiddavanahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 3.25 Chitradurga 220

424 Savitha Chemicals Siegegudda Kavalu village Hassan Hassan 1.25 Hassan 220

425 Kuminex Minerals (P) Ltd Siegegudda Kavalu village Hassan Hassan 1.25 Hassan 220

Page 94: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

80 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

426 Rita Inetrantional Navali Huvinahadagali Bellary 1.5 Ittagi 220

427 Savitha Chemicals Siegegudda Kavalu village Hassan Hassan 1.25 Hassan 220

428 Gangadhar Narasingdas Agarwal Haltithimalapura Navali village hills,

Hoovinahadagali Huvinhagali Bellary 4.5 Ittagi 220

429 The Chennai Silks Shivapura Kaval village Belur Belur Hassan 1.25 Chikamagalur

220

430 The Chennai Silks Shivapura Kaval village Belur Belur Hassan 1.25 Chikamagalur

220

431 Sai krishna Minerals (P) Ltd., Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.5 Mundargi 110

432 Hindustan Zinc Limited Kurthkoti, Harti Gadag Gadag 4.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

433 Accion Wind Energy (P) Ltd-

WZM Arasingundi Jagalur Davangere 13.2 Chitradurga 220

434 Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd-HK-3 Chikkandavadi Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

435 Generacion Eolica India (P) Ltd Harti Gadag Gadag 6.4 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

436 ILC Industries Ltd., Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.5 Mundargi 110

437 Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd-HK-2 Chikkandavadi Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

438 Belgaum Wind Farms (P) Ltd Harti Gadag Gadag 0.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

439 BP Energy India (P) Limited Bharamasagar Chitradurga Chitradurga 11.55 Chitradurga 220

440 Hindustan Zinc Limited Kurthkoti, Harti Gadag Gadag 3.2 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

441 Skytech Enginbeering Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

442 Nagashanthi Enterprises (P) Ltd-

GWL Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

443 J.B.M. Industries Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

444 Mayura Steels Pvt Ltd., - TDPL Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.45 Bellahatti 110

445 B.S.Channabasappa & Sons, Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.675 Bellahatti 110

446 Basvaraj N Patil Limited-GWL Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

447 Kedia Enterprises Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.45 Bellahatti 110

Page 95: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 81

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

448 Bhanwar Deep Copper Strpis (P)

Ltd Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

449 B.S.C.Textiles Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

450 Rachana Consrtuction Co., Beladhadi Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

451 Belgaum Wind Farms (P) Ltd Kurthkoti, Asundi, Binkadakatte &

Hulkoti Gadag Gadag 4

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

452 Kummnix Minerals (P) Ltd Nitturu Hassan Hassan 2.5 Hassan 220

453 Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd-HK-4 & HK-

5 Chikkandavadi Chitradurga Chitradurga 3 Chitradurga 220

454 Generacion Eolica India (P) Ltd Harti Gadag Gadag 3.2 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

455 BP Energy India (P) Limited Bharamasagar Chitradurga Chitradurga 8.25 Chitradurga 220

456 Accion Wind Energy (P) Ltd-

BWPPL Anabur & Sokke Jagalur Davangere 16.5 Chitradurga 220

457 Generacion Eolica India (P) Ltd Harti Gadag Gadag 3.2 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

458 Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd-HK-1& HK-

6 Chikkandavadi Chitradurga Chitradurga 3 Chitradurga 220

459 Savitha Chemicals Ltd Ph-1 Rangapura Kavalu Arasikere Hassan 1.5 Arasikere 110

460 Savitha Chemicals Ltd Ph-2 Kopalahalli Holenarsipura Hassan 1.5

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

461 Savitha Chemicals Ltd Ph-3 Nayakanakerekavalu Holenarsipura Hassan 1.5

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

462 Simran Wind Power Project (P)

Ltd -Ph-2 Aidahalli Kaval Belur Hassan 1.5

Chikamagalur

220

463 Super wind project (P) Ltd Ph-6 Elakuranahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

464 Super wind project (P) Ltd Ph-7 Elakuranahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

465 Super wind project (P) Ltd Ph-8 Yarehalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

466 Energy Development Company

Ltd Yarehalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

Page 96: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

82 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

467 Leo Fasterners Banjegondanahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

468 BP Energy India (P) Limited Bharamasagar Chitradurga Chitradurga 11.55 Chitradurga 220

469 Generacion Eolica India (P) Ltd Harti Gadag Gadag 2.4 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

470 BP Energy India (P) Limited Bharamasagar Chitradurga Chitradurga 4.95 Chitradurga 220

471 The Tata Power Company Ltd Hosur, Kanavi & Mulgund Gadag Gadag 4 Shirhatti 110

472 The Tata Power Company Ltd Hosur, Kanavi & Mulgund Gadag Gadag 4 Shirhatti 110

473 The Tata Power Company Ltd Hosur, Kanavi & Mulgund Gadag Gadag 4 Shirhatti 110

474 Belgaum Wind Farms (P) Ltd Kurthkoti, Asundi, Binkadakatte &

Hulkoti Gadag Gadag 3.2

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

475 Belgaum Wind Farms (P) Ltd Kurthkoti, Asundi, Binkadakatte &

Hulkoti Gadag Gadag 3.2

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

476 BP Energy India (P) Limited Telagi Harapanahalli Davangere 3.3 Davanagere 220

477 BP Energy India (P) Limited Telagi Harapanahalli Davangere 9.9 Davanagere 220

478 BP Energy India (P) Limited Telagi Harapanahalli Davangere 4.95 Davanagere 220

479 BP Energy India (P) Limited Telagi Harapanahalli Davangere 4.95 Davanagere 220

480 The Tata power company Ltd Hosur, Kanavi & Mulgund Gadag Gadag 3.2 Shirhatti 110

481 Belgaum Wind Farms (P) Ltd Kurthkoti, Asundi, Binkadakatte &

Hulkoti Gadag Gadag 2.4

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

482 Belgaum Wind Farms (P) Ltd Kurthkoti, Asundi, Binkadakatte &

Hulkoti Gadag Gadag 3.2

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

483 P.Venganna Setty & Bros-Ph-1 Sogi Huvinahadagalli Bellary 1.25 Ittagi 220

484 The Campco Ltd Ayyanahalli Bellary Bellary 1.25 Sankalapur 110

485 KMMI Steels (P) Ltd Ph-1 & Ph-2 Ayyanahalli Bellary Bellary 2.5 Sankalapur 110

486 Simran Wind Power Project (P)

Ltd Elkurnahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.25 Chitradurga 220

487 Simran Wind Power Project (P)

Ltd Elkurnahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.25 Chitradurga 220

488 Leo Fasterners Banjegondanahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

Page 97: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 83

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

489 National Mineral Development

Corporation Ltd Banjegondanahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

490 Indo wind Energy Ltd Elkurnahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 9 Chitradurga 220

491 Sargam Retails (P) Ltd - Ph-1 Kudrekonda Honnali Davangere 5 Honnali 220

492 RMMPL-Ph-2 Bagall Harapanahalli Davangere 2.5 Ittagi 220

493 RMMPL-Ph-3 Jajikalgudda Harapanahalli Davangere 5 Ittagi 220

494 P.Venganna Setty & Bros-Ph-2 Jajikalgudda Harapanahalli Davangere 1.25 Ittagi 220

495 ICSA-Ph-1 & Ph-2 Kudrekonda Honnali Davangere 3 Honnali 220

496 D J Malpani Kudrekonda Honnali Davangere 3 Honnali 220

497 Super wind project (P) Ltd Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 4.5 Mundargi 110

498 Avon Cycles Ltd Gopalpura Hassan Hassan 1.5

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

499 BVSR Energy Systems-Ph-1 & Ph-

2 Gopalpura Hassan Hassan 3

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

500 Sree Minerals Gopalpura Hassan Hassan 1.5

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

501 A MA Traders Beladhadi & Navapur Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

502 K E Kantesh Beladhadi & Navapur Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

503 G.S.Gayathri Beladhadi & Navapur Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

504 G.M. Prasanna Kumar Beladhadi & Navapur Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

505 G.M. Lingaraju Beladhadi & Navapur Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

506 AAA & Sons Enterprises (P) Lrd Beladhadi & Navapur Gadag Gadag 0.9 Bellahatti 110

507 ESMO Industries Beladhadi & Navapur Gadag Gadag 0.225 Bellahatti 110

508 Doodanavar & Brothers Hanumasagar Kustagi Koppal 1.5 Kustagi 110

509 Shree krishna minerals Hanumasagar Kustagi Koppal 3 Kustagi 110

510 Dr. V V Subba Reddy Shirol & Shirur Gadag Gadag 0.25 Shirol 110

Page 98: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

84 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

511 Chandama Farm & Horticulture

Research Centre (P) Ltd Shirol & Shirur Gadag Gadag 0.25 Shirol 110

512 Shah distributors Hanumasagar Kustagi Koppal 0.25 Kustagi 110

513 Orange County Resort & Hotels

Ltd Gowdegere Ron Gadag 0.6

Gajendragad

110

514 The Tata Power Company Ltd Hosur, Kanavi & Mulgund Gadag Gadag 2.4 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

515 The Tata Power Company Ltd Hosur, Kanavi & Mulgund Gadag Gadag 2.4 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

516 The Tata Power Company Ltd Hosur, Kanavi & Mulgund Gadag Gadag 3.2 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

517 Rahul Dravid Harthi Gadag Gadag 0.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

518 R B Seth Shreeram Narsingdas Harthi & Beladadi Gadag Gadag 3.2 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

519 G.N.Agrawal Kudrekonda Honnali Davangere 4.5 Honnali 220

520 Ferromar Shipping (P) Ltd., Kudrekonda Honnali Davangere 1.5 Honnali 220

521 Abhishek Developers Phase-3 Gopalpura Hassan Hassan 4.5

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

522 Sargam Retails Pvt Ltd Kudrekonda Honnali Davangere 1.25 Honnali 220

523 The Tata Power Company Ltd Hosur, Kanavi & Mulgund Gadag Gadag 0.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

524 The Tata Power Company Ltd Kanavi Hosur and Harthi Gadag Gadag 3.2 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

525 The Tata Power Company Ltd Hosur, Kanavi & Mulgund Gadag Gadag 1.6 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

526 The Tata Power Company Ltd Kanavi Hosur and Harthi Gadag Gadag 2.4 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

527 The Tata Power Company Ltd Kanavi Hosur and Harthi Gadag Gadag 1.6 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

528 The Tata Power Company Ltd Hosur, Kanavi & Mulgund Gadag Gadag 1.6 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

Page 99: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 85

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

529 Ravi Nursing Home Shirund Gadag Gadag 0.25 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

530 The Tata Power Company Ltd Kanavi Hosur and Harthi Gadag Gadag 2.4 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

531 The Tata Power Company Ltd Hosur, Kanavi & Mulgund Gadag Gadag 0.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

532 Abhishek Developers Phase-1 Kudrekonda Honnali Davangere 4.5 Honnali 220

533 Abhishek Developers Phase-2 Kudrekonda Honnali Davangere 3 Honnali 220

534 Hotel Leelaventures Kudrekonda Honnali Davangere 2.5 Honnali 220

535 Ramgad Mineral and mining Pvt.

Ltd Sogi Huvinahadagalli Bellary 3.75 Ittagi 220

536 CEPCO Industries Pvt. Ltd. Beladadi Gadag Gadag 2.4 Bellahatti 110

537 Shreeram Narsingdas Harthi Gadag Gadag 1.6 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

538 Eastman International Gopalpura Hassan Hassan 1.5

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

539 Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd Chikkandavadi Chitradurga Chitradurga 4.5 Chitradurga 220

540 Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd Chikkandavadi Chitradurga Chitradurga 6 Chitradurga 220

541 Nectar Beverages Pvt Ltd Naregal Naregal Gadag 1 Naregal 110

542 Nuziveedu Seeds Ltd Chikkandavadi Chitradurga Chitradurga 6 Chitradurga 220

543 CLP Wind Farms (India) Pvt Ltd Goravinakolla Saundatti Belgaum 18.4 Saundatti 110

544 Technical Associates Ltd Gopalpura Hassan Hassan 1.5

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

545 Friends Salt Works & Allied

Industries Gopalpura Hassan Hassan 4.5

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

546 H.G.Rangan Goud (phase-I) Gangavansara Honnali Davangere 1.25 Honnali 220

547 Mac Charles (India)Ltd Sindgiri Siruguppa Bellary 2.1 Kurugodu 110

548 Scotts Garments Ltd Sindgiri Siruguppa Bellary 2.1 Kurugodu 110

Page 100: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

86 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

549 Palogix Infrastructure Pvt Ltd Gopalpura Hassan Hassan 1.5

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

550 PTC India Financial Services Ltd

(Phase-1) Kundur Honnali Davangere 6 Honnali 220

551 Sree Minerals Kallenahalli Jagalur Davangere 10.5 Chitradurga 220

552 Gautham Fright Pvt Ltd Kallenahalli Jagalur Davangere 2.1 Davanagere 220

553 Deepak Cables (I) Pvt Ltd Harthi Gadag Gadag 0.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

554 CLP Wind Farms (India) Pvt Ltd Goravinakolla Saundatti Belgaum 2.4 Saundatti 110

555 Bombay Rayon Fashions Ltd Konchigere Siruguppa Bellary 2.1 Kurugodu 110

556 CLP Wind Farms (India) Pvt Ltd Katamalli & Hooli Saundatti Belgaum 16 Saundatti 110

557 ITC Limited Sindgiri Siruguppa Bellary 18.9 Kurugodu 110

558 Pearlite Linears (P) Limited Kundur Honnali Davangere 1.5 Honnali 220

559 Nuziveedu Seeds Limited Bharamasagar Chitradurga Chitradurga 2.1 Chitradurga 220

560 Nuziveedu Seeds Limited Bharamasagar Chitradurga Chitradurga 2.1 Chitradurga 220

561 Nuziveedu Seeds Limited Bharamasagar Chitradurga Chitradurga 2.1 Chitradurga 220

562 Nuziveedu Seeds Limited Bharamasagar Chitradurga Chitradurga 2.1 Chitradurga 220

563 SRB Consultancy (P) Limited Kundur Honnali Davangere 1.5 Honnali 220

564 SRB Consultancy (P) Limited Kundur Honnali Davangere 1.5 Honnali 220

565 ITC Limited Sindgiri Siruguppa Bellary 2.1 Kurugodu 110

566 Vish Wind Infrastrcture LLP Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 6.4 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

567 Nuziveedu Seeds Limited Kallavanagathihalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 4.5 Chitradurga 220

568 Orient Abrasis Ltd (KAL-17) Kalmangi Gangavathi Koppal 1.5 Sindhanur 110

569 CLP Wind Farms (India) Pvt Ltd Sirsangi Saundatti Belgaum 7.2 Saundatti 110

570 CLP Wind Farms (India) Pvt Ltd Harapanahalli Harapanahalli Davangere 13.2 Ittagi 220

571 KRBL Limited (KAL-19) Kalmangi Gangavathi Koppal 1.5 Sindhanur 110

572 Orient Abrasis Ltd (KAL-16) Kalmangi Gangavathi Koppal 1.5 Sindhanur 110

Page 101: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 87

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

573 EN Renewables Limited Kakati Belgaum Belgaum 24 Belgaum 220

574 CLP Wind Farms (India) Pvt Ltd Harapanahalli Harapanahalli Davangere 26.4 Ittagi 220

575 EN Renewable Energy Limited Kakati Belgaum Belgaum 12 Belgaum 220

576 Protectron Electro mech (P)

Limited Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 0.8

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

577 EN Renewable Energy Limited Kakati Belgaum Belgaum 14.4 Belgaum 220

578 Golden Hatcheries Adavisomapura Gadag Gadag 4.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

579 MBM Engineering Infotech

Limited Adavisomapura Gadag Gadag 1.6

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

580 Swastik Construction Services Adavisomapura Gadag Gadag 0.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

581 SVE Castings (P) Limited Kalmangi Sindanur Raichur 1.5 Sindhanur 110

582 Kuminex Minerlas Private Limited Kalmangi Sindanur Raichur 1.5 Sindhanur 110

583 Avon Cycles Ltd Kalmangi Sindanur Raichur 1.5 Sindhanur 110

584 Kuminex Minerlas Private Limited Kalmangi Sindanur Raichur 1.5 Sindhanur 110

585 Vikram Trader Halvagalu Harapanahalli Davangere 2.1 Ittagi 220

586 Maris Hotel and Theatres (P)

Limited Halvagalu Harapanahalli Davangere 2.1 Ittagi 220

587 Malaxmi Wind Power Sindgiri Siruguppa Bellary 2.1 Kurugodu 110

588 Gupta Coalfileds and washeries

Limited Sindgiri Siruguppa Bellary 2.1 Kurugodu 110

589 Hindustan Zinc Limited Gopalpura Hassan Hassan 4.5

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

590 Hindustan Zinc Limited Gopalpura Hassan Hassan 1.5

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

591 HGML HGML Chitradurga Chitradurga 2.1 Chitradurga 220

592 Protectron Electro mech (P)

Limited Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 0.8

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

Page 102: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

88 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

593 Srinivas Hacheries K-505 Ganganakatti Shikaripura Shimoga 1.5 Davanagere 220

594 Srinivas Hacheries K-521 Tirutharampur Honnali Davangere 1.5 Honnali 220

595 Orient Abrasives Limited KAL-14 Kalmangi Sindanur Raichur 1.5 Sindhanur 110

596 Khanna Industrial Pipes (P) Ltd Erekatte Shikaripura Shimoga 1.5 Shikaripura 110

597 Tuppadahalli Energy India (P)

Limited Tuppadahalli channagiri Shimoga 24.75 Kadur 220

598 KRBL Limited Kalmangi Sindanur Raichur 4.5 Sindhanur 110

599 Bright Packaging Pvt Ltd NEJ Chikkodi Belgaum 1.7 Bhoj 110

600 Tuppadahalli Energy India (P)

Limited Tuppadahalli channagiri Shimoga 16.5 Kadur 220

601 Beta Wind Farm Private Limited Erekatte Shikaripura Shimoga 1.25 Shikaripura 110

602 Sree Minerals SND-100 Konchigere Siruguppa Bellary 2.1 Kurugodu 110

603 Sree Minerals SND-104 Sindigiri Siruguppa Bellary 2.1 Kurugodu 110

604 KRBL Limited SND-103 Sindigiri Siruguppa Bellary 2.1 Kurugodu 110

605 Rajastham Gum (P) Limited Kurugod Siruguppa Bellary 2.1 Kurugodu 110

606 Ruchi Soya Industries Limited Kalmangi Sindanur Raichur 3 Sindhanur 110

607 Rajastham Gum (P) Limited KAL-

10 Kalmangi Gangavathi Koppal 1.5 Sindhanur 110

608 Vish Wind Infrastrcture LLP Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 0.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

609 Nuziveedu Seeds Limited Bhimasamudra Chitradurga Chitradurga 12 Chitradurga 220

610 Tuppadahalli Energy India (P)

Limited Tuppadahalli channagiri Shimoga 14.85 Kadur 220

611 M.K.Agrotech Private Limited Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 2.4 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

612 Vish Wind Infrastrcture LLP Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 0.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

613 Agrawal Minerals (Goa) Private

Limited (SND-105) Kurugod Siruguppa Bellary 2.1 Kurugodu 110

614 Agrawal Minerals (Goa) Private

Limited (SND-106) Kurugod Siruguppa Bellary 2.1 Kurugodu 110

Page 103: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 89

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

615 GAIL India Limited (MG 01 to 06) Chinnapura, Chikkanahalli and

Kyatanahalli Holenarsipura Hassan 9

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

616 GAIL India Limited (MG 07 to 13) Bettada Satenahalli, Sigaranahalli and

Hariharpura Holenarsipura Hassan 10.5

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

617 GAIL India Limited (MG 14 to 15) Kallenahalli Holenarsipura Hassan 3

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

618 GAIL India Limited (MG 16 to 17) Kallenahalli Holenarsipura Hassan 3

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

619 Pearlite Linears (P) Limited Sigaranahalli Holenarsipura Hassan 1.5

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

620 GAIL India Limited SD-29 Alagatti Byadagi Haveri 2.1 Bydagi 110

621 GAIL India Limited (SD 32, 34, 35

,36) Byadagi and Kadarmadargi Byadagi Haveri 8.4 Bydagi 110

622 Golden Hatcheries Karoshi Chikkodi Belgaum 3.4 Bhoj 110

623 Manjushree Technopack Limited Karoshi Chikkodi Belgaum 3.4 Bhoj 110

624 Golden Hatcheries Shirgoan Chikkodi Belgaum 0.85 Shirgaon 110

625 Golden Hatcheries Shirgoan Chikkodi Belgaum 1.7 Shirgaon 110

626 Golden Hatcheries Shirgoan Chikkodi Belgaum 2.55 Shirgaon 110

627 Doddanavar Global Wind Private

Limited Chikkodi Chikkodi Belgaum 16 Chikkodi 110

628 Rajasthan Gum (P) Limited Masangi Byadagi Haveri 4.2 Bydagi 110

629 Giriraj Enteprises (Sidenur-2) Byadagi Byadagi Haveri 4.2 Bydagi 110

630 Araind P.Joshi and Company MG-

18 Sigaranahalli - Hassan 1.5 Hassan 220

631 Giriraj Enteprises (Abletech

Electro Engineers Hirebudihal and Aladhgere Byadagi Haveri 6.3 Bydagi 110

Page 104: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

90 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

632 Giriraj Enteprises (Abletech

Electro Engineers Aladagere Byadagi Haveri 2.1 Bydagi 110

633 Tadas Wind Energy Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 11.2 Ramanakoppa

110

634 Vish Wind Infrastrcture LLP Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 1.6 Ramanakoppa

110

635 Tadas Wind Energy Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 10.4 Ramanakoppa

110

636 Tadas Wind Energy Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 20.8 Ramanakoppa

110

637 Tadas Wind Energy Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 4 Ramanakoppa

110

638 Tadas Wind Energy Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 2.4 Ramanakoppa

110

639 Tadas Wind Energy Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 4.8 Ramanakoppa

110

640 Tadas Wind Energy Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 4.8 Ramanakoppa

110

641 Tadas Wind Energy Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 1.6 Ramanakoppa

110

642 Tadas Wind Energy Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 6.4 Ramanakoppa

110

643 Tadas Wind Energy Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 2.4 Ramanakoppa

110

644 Tadas Wind Energy Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 12 Ramanakoppa

110

645 Doddanavar Global Wind Private

Limited Chikkodi Chikkodi Belgaum 16 Chikkodi 110

646 Tadas Wind Energy Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 2.4 Ramanakoppa

110

647 AB.Mallikarjuna Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 0.8 Ramanakoppa

110

648 Ablilash Software Development

Centre Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 1.6

Ramanakoppa

110

Page 105: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 91

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

649 Prasad Technology Park (P)

Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 1.6

Ramanakoppa

110

650 Tadas Wind Energy Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 4.8 Ramanakoppa

110

651 Swastik Constructions Services Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 0.8 Ramanakoppa

110

652 Giriraj Enterprises Aladagere Byadagi Haveri 2.1 Bydagi 110

653 Tadas Wind Energy Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 4 Ramanakoppa

110

654 Tadas Wind Energy Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 4.8 Ramanakoppa

110

655 Tadas Wind Energy Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 3.2 Ramanakoppa

110

656 Renew Wind Power (Karnataka)

Pvt Limited Tadas Kundgola Dharwad 2.4 Bidnal 220

657 Renew Wind Power (Karnataka)

Pvt Limited Tadas Kundgola Dharwad 4 Bidnal 220

658 Renew Wind Power (Karnataka)

Pvt Limited Tadas Kundgola Dharwad 5.6 Bidnal 220

659 Renew Wind Power (Karnataka)

Pvt Limited Tadas Kundgola Dharwad 3.2 Bidnal 220

660 Jayalaxmi Exports and imports (P)

Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 0.8

Ramanakoppa

110

661 Renew Wind Power (Karnataka)

Pvt Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 1.6

Ramanakoppa

110

662 Renew Wind Power (Karnataka)

Pvt Limited Tadas Kundgola Dharwad 4 Bidnal 220

663 Renew Wind Power (Karnataka)

Pvt Limited Tadas Kundgola Dharwad 8.8 Bidnal 220

664 Swastik Constructions Services Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 0.8 Ramanakoppa

110

665 Renew Wind Power (Karnataka)

Pvt Limited Tadas Kundgola Dharwad 13.6 Bidnal 220

Page 106: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

92 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

666 Renew Wind Power (Karnataka)

Pvt Limited Tadas Kundgola Dharwad 2.4 Bidnal 220

667 Renew Wind Power (AP) Pvt

Limited Karoshi Chikkodi Belgaum 18 Bhoj 110

668 Polypack Industries tadas Kundgola Dharwad 0.8 Bidnal 220

669 Bidar Rubber and Reclaims Private

Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 0.8

Ramanakoppa

110

670 ITC Limited Bambarge Belgaum Belgaum 8.75 Belgaum 220

671 Rangineni Steel Private Limited Bambarge Belgaum Belgaum 1.25 Belgaum 220

672 Lalpur Wind Energy Limited

(Group A) Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 7.2

Ramanakoppa

110

673 Lalpur Wind Energy Limited

(Group B) Tadas Kundgola Dharwad 19.2 Bidnal 220

674 Lalpur Wind Energy Limited

(Group C) Tadas Kundgola Dharwad 6.4 Bidnal 220

675 Lalpur Wind Energy Limited

(Group D) Tadas Kundgola Dharwad 4.8 Bidnal 220

676 Lalpur Wind Energy Limited Tadas Kundgola Dharwad 6.4 Bidnal 220

677 RNS Power Limited Adavisomapura and Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 5.6 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

678 Maris Power Supply Company

Private Limited Adavisomapura Gadag Gadag 3.2

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

679 Greenergy Wind Corporation

Private Limited Kalasapura and Nagavi Gadag Gadag 2.4

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

680 R.B.Seth Shreeram Narasingdas Adavisomapura and Papanashi Gadag Gadag 1.6 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

681 Mytrah Vayu (Krishna) Private

Limited Savalsang Indi Bijapur 56.95 Indi 220

682 Mangalore Energies Private

Limited Ingeshwara Basavanababewadi Bijapur 15 B Bagewadi 220

683 Greenergy Wind Corporation

Private Limited Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 1.6

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

Page 107: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 93

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

684 R.B.Seth Shreeram Narasingdas Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 1.6 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

685 Maris Power Supply Company

Private Limited kalasapura Gadag Gadag 1.6

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

686 Shilpa Medicare Limited Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 3.2 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

687 Prasad Windmiils (P) Limited Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 0.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

688 Bhoruka Power Corporation

Limited Savsuddi Raybag Belgaum 17 Itnal 110

689 Greenergy Wind Corporation

Private Limited Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 3.2

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

690 R.B.Seth Shreeram Narasingdas Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 0.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

691 Mytrah Vayu (Krishna) Private

Limited Savalsang Indi Bijapur 13.6 Indi 220

692 Bhoruka Power Corporation

Limited savsuddi Raybag Belgaum 13.6 Itnal 110

693 Fortune Five Hydel Projects (P)

Limited Ingeshwara Basavanababewadi Bijapur 50 B Bagewadi 220

694 Greenergy Wind Corporation

Private Limited Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 4

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

695 Polypack Industries Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 0.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

696 Jayalaxmi Exports and imports (P)

Limited Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 0.8

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

697 Prasad Windmiils (P) Limited Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 0.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

698 Maris Power Supply Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 2.4 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

699 Mytrah Vayu (Krishna) Private

Limited Savalsang Indi Bijapur 16.15 Indi 220

700 Varuna Aurovilee Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 0.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

Page 108: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

94 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

701 RNS Power Limited Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 0.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

702 Canara PCC Poles Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 0.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

703 Greenergy Wind Corporation

Private Limited Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 1.6

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

704 Protectron Electro mech (P)

Limited Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 1.6

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

705 R.B.Seth Shreeram Narasingdas Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 0.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

706 RNS Power Limited Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 0.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

707 M.K.Eco Power Private Limited Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 1.6 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

708 Greenergy Wind Corporation

Private Limited Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 1.6

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

709 Anu Cashews Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 0.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

710 Mac Charles (India)Ltd (TDPL) Shirunji, Nabhapura Gadag Gadag 4.2 Mundargi 110

711 Bhoruka Power Corporation

Limited Savsuddi Raybag Belgaum 18.7 Itnal 110

712 Vaayudana Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 0.8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

713 M.K.Eco Power Private Limited Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 1.6 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

714 Greenergy Wind Corporation

Private Limited Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 1.6

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

715 Mytrah Vayu (Krishna) Private

Limited Savalsang Indi Bijapur 1.7 Indi 220

716 Mytrah Vayu (Krishna) Private

Limited Savalsang Indi Bijapur 3.4 Indi 220

717 Mytrah Vayu (Krishna) Private

Limited Savalsang Indi Bijapur 3.4 Indi 220

Page 109: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 95

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

718 Rajasthan Gum Private Limited

(TDPL) Belathadi Gadag Gadag 2.1 Bellahatti 110

719 Shree Ram Industires (TDPL) Belathadi Gadag Gadag 2.1 Bellahatti 110

720 M.Hanumantha Rao (TDPL) Belathadi Gadag Gadag 2.1 Bellahatti 110

721 Green Infra Wind Power

Generation Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 1.6

Ramanakoppa

110

722 Green Infra Wind Power

Generation Limited Tadas Shiggaon Haveri 2.4

Ramanakoppa

110

723 Clean Wind Power (Manvi) Private

Limited Kavithal Manvi Raichur 6 Manvi 110

724 M.Hanumantha Rao (TDPL) Belathadi Gadag Gadag 2.1 Bellahatti 110

725 Power Link System Private

Limited Mallali Kundgola Dharwad 0.8 Bidnal 220

726 Mysore Mercantile Company Ltd., Gojnur Gadag Gadag 6 Bellahatti 110

727 BEML Limited Hanumasagar Kustagi Koppal 9 Kustagi 110

728 Best Corporation Private Limited Hire Hesur Lingasugur Raichur 6 Hatti 110

729 Viking Knitters Nilogal Lingasugur Raichur 2 Hatti 110

730 Rai Bhadhur Seth Shreeram

Narsingdas Private Limited Nilogal Lingasugur Raichur 4 Hatti 110

731 M.Hanumantha Rao (TDPL) Belathadi Gadag Gadag 2.1 Bellahatti 110

732 Pearlite Linears (P) Limited Nilogal Lingasugur Raichur 2 Hatti 110

733 Bhoruka Power Corporation

Limited Yelisurur Gadag Gadag 27.2 Mundargi 110

734 Greenko Bagewadi Wind Energies

Private Limited Basavanabageadi Basavanababewadi Bijapur 30 B Bagewadi 220

735 Vyshali Energy Private Limited Kumatagi Bijapur Bijapur 48 Bijapur 220

736 Rohan Solar Power Private

Limited (Abletech) Kundur Honnali Davangere 10 Honnali 220

737 Sakathi Masala (P) Limited Nilogal Lingasugur Raichur 2 Hatti 110

738 Babu Sares (P) Limited Nilogal Lingasugur Raichur 2 Hatti 110

Page 110: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

96 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

739 Prakash Silks and Sares Private

Limited Hirehesurur Lingasugur Raichur 2 Hatti 110

740 Renew Wind Energy Private

Limited Amaravathi, Basapur, Chikkahesarur Lingasugur Raichur 20 Hatti 110

741 Renew Wind Energy Private

Limited Khota, Hireheruru, chikkahesuru Lingasugur Raichur 20 Hatti 110

742 Vivek Agro Foods Bellikatte Kudligi Bellary 2.4 Donimalali 110

743 Nandi Roller Flour Mills Private

Limited Bellikatte Kudligi Bellary 0.8 Donimalali 110

744 Bharat Petroleum Corporation

Limited Harapanahalli Harapanahalli Davangere 4.2 Ittagi 220

745 Bharat Petroleum Corporation

Limited Harapanahalli Harapanahalli Davangere 2.1 Ittagi 220

746 Hindustan Aeronautics Limited Harapanahalli Harapanahalli Davangere 4.2 Ittagi 220

747 Hindustan Aeronautics Limited Harapanahalli Harapanahalli Davangere 2.1 Ittagi 220

748 Bharat Electronics Limited Harapanahalli Harapanahalli Davangere 8.4 Ittagi 220

749 Vyshali Energy Private Limited Kamatagi Bijapur Bijapur 2 Bijapur 220

750 ReNew Wind Energy (Karnataka)

Pvt Limited Abbigeri Ron Gadag 12 Ron 110

751 ReNew Wind Energy (Karnataka)

Pvt Limited Abbigeri Ron Gadag 8 Ron 110

752 ReNew Wind Energy (Karnataka)

Pvt Limited Abbigeri Ron Gadag 8 Ron 110

753 Sakthi Masala Private Limited Abbigeri Ron Gadag 4 Ron 110

754 P.Balasubbasetty Power and Steel Abbigeri Ron Gadag 4 Ron 110

755 P.Balasubbasetty Power and Steel Abbigeri Ron Gadag 2 Ron 110

756 Energon KN Wind Power Private

Limited Mangoli Basavanababewadi Bijapur 46 Mukarthihal 110

757 Vyshali Energy Private Limited Kumatagi, Kaggod, Shivangi and Hadagali Bijapur Bijapur 50 Bijapur 220

758 Bhoruka Power Corporation

Limited Savsuddi Raybag Belgaum 15.3 Itnal 110

Page 111: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 97

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

759 Matrix Power (Wind) Private

Limited Hebbal Basavanababewadi Bijapur 24 Mukarthihal 110

760 Athavan Solar Projects Abbigeri Ron Gadag 4 Ron 110

761 Dr K.Ramakrishnan Abbigeri Ron Gadag 2 Ron 110

762 Balaji Malts Private Limited Abbigeri Ron Gadag 2 Ron 110

763 Ferns Builders and Developers Abbigeri Ron Gadag 2 Ron 110

764 Bhoruka Power Corporation

Limited Yelisurur Gadag Gadag 17 Mundargi 110

765 Green Infra Wind Power

Generation Limited Madapur, Uparakeri, Harapanahalli Harapanahalli Davangere 20 Ittagi 220

766 Sandur Power Company Private

Limited Kamatagi Bijapur Bijapur 4 Bijapur 220

767 Renew Wind Energy (Sipla) Pvt

Limited Batkurki Ramdurga Belgaum 26 Lokapur 110

768 Sandur Power Company Private

Limited Kamatagi Bijapur Bijapur 8 Bijapur 220

769 Green Infra Wind Power

Generation Limited Madapur, Uparakeri, Harapanahalli Harapanahalli Davangere 16 Ittagi 220

770 Orange Mamkheda Wind Private

Limited Gurmitkal Gurmitkal Gulburga 16 Gurmatkal 110

771 Renew Wind Energy (Sipla) Pvt

Limited Batkurki Ramdurga Belgaum 34 Lokapur 110

772 Ostro Mahawind Power Private

Limited Sattigeri Saundatti Belgaum 12 Saundatti 110

773 Green Infra Wind Power

Generation Limited Anathanahalli Harapanahalli Davangere 34 Ittagi 220

774 Kalyani Techpark Private Limited Magadi & Gojanur Shirahhti Gadag 10 Bellahatti 110

775 Sun Photo Voltaic Energy India

Private Limited Kanamadi Tikota Bijapur 18 Tikota 110

776 Green Infra Wind Power

Generation Limited Anathanahalli Harapanahalli Davangere 10 Ittagi 220

777 Ostro Mahawind Power Private

Limited Sattigeri Saundatti Belgaum 32 Saundatti 110

Page 112: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

98 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

778 Orange Mamkheda Wind Private

Limited Gurmitkal Gurmitkal Gulburga 44 Gurmatkal 110

779 Sun Photo Voltaic Energy India

Private Limited Kanamadi Tikota Bijapur 42 Tikota 110

780 Renew Wind Energy (Sipla) Pvt

Limited Bableshwara Bijapur Bijapur 24

Babaleshwar

110

781 Renew Wind Energy (Sipla) Pvt

Limited Bableshwara Bijapur Bijapur 26

Babaleshwar

110

782 Clean Wind Power (Bableshwar)

Private Limited Bableshwara Bijapur Bijapur 24

Babaleshwar

110

783 Clean Wind Power (Piploda)

Private Limited Bableshwara Bijapur Bijapur 26

Babaleshwar

110

784 PTC Energy Limited Bableshwara Bijapur Bijapur 24 Babaleshwar

110

785 PTC Energy Limited Bableshwara Bijapur Bijapur 26 Babaleshwar

110

786 Dr K.Ramakrishnan Bableshwara Bijapur Bijapur 2 Babaleshwar

110

787 Ostro Mahawind Power Private

Limited Sattigeri Saundatti Belgaum 16 Saundatti 110

788 Aikam Holdings Private Limited Madanayanahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 8 Chitradurga 220

789 Poonawalla Investments and

industries Private Limited Harapanahalli Harapanahalli Davangere 2.1 Ittagi 220

790 Poonawalla Investments and

industries Private Limited Adavihalli and Harapanahalli Harapanahalli Davangere 8.4 Ittagi 220

791 Seram Institute of India Private

Limited Kambatrahalli Harapanahalli Davangere 8.4 Ittagi 220

792 Sakthi Masala Private Limited Basavanabageadi Basavanababewadi Bijapur 10 B Bagewadi 220

793 Ahill Apparel Exports (P) Limited Basavanabageadi Basavanababewadi Bijapur 2 B Bagewadi 220

794 Laurel Apparels Basavanabageadi Basavanababewadi Bijapur 2 B Bagewadi 220

795 The Impetus Associates LLP Basavanabageadi Basavanababewadi Bijapur 2 B Bagewadi 220

796 Eswari Green Energy LLP Basavanabageadi Basavanababewadi Bijapur 4 B Bagewadi 220

Page 113: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 99

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

797 KSSIDC Talakavery Madikere Madikere 0.55 Kushalnagara

220

798 Karnakaka Power Corporation Ltd Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 2.025 Mundargi 110

799 Karnakaka Power Corporation Ltd Kappattagudda / Gadag Mundargi Gadag 1.15 Mundargi 110

800 Karnakaka Power Corporation Ltd. Kappattagudda / Gadag Mundargi Gadag 1.38 Mundargi 110

801 Karnataka Renewable Energy

Development Ltd. Mavinahunda Raybag Belgaum 2 Itnal 110

802 Karnataka Renewable Energy

Development Ltd. Sogi Huvinahadagalli Bellary 2.5 Ittagi 220

803 Hutti Gold Mines Company Ltd Ingaldal Chitradurga Chitradurga 4.8 Chitradurga 220

804 Hutti Gold Mines Company Ltd Ingaldalu Chitradurga Chitradurga 4.5 Chitradurga 220

805 Balaji Malts Private Limited Harakhabahvi Kudligi Bellary 1.6 Donimalali 110

806 Jindal Aluminum Limited Bylutumbaraguddi Kudligi Bellary 12 Donimalali 110

807 ReNew Wind Energy (Karnataka)

Pvt Limited Bellikatte Kudligi Bellary 4.8 Donimalali 110

808 Murugendra Rajendra Oil NEJ Chikkodi Belgaum 0.85 Bhoj 110

809 Askok Iron Works (P) Limited NEJ Chikkodi Belgaum 2.55 Bhoj 110

810 Oswal Woollen Mills Limited NEJ Chikkodi Belgaum 0.85 Bhoj 110

811 The Campco Ltd NEJ Chikkodi Belgaum 1.7 Bhoj 110

812 Sarayu Cleangen Private Limited NEJ Chikkodi Belgaum 3.4 Bhoj 110

813 Sandur Power Company Private

Limited Kamatagi Bijapur Bijapur 12 Bijapur 220

814 Devarahipparagi Wind Power

Private Limited Kamatagi Bijapur Bijapur 100 Bijapur 220

815 GAIL India Limited SD -25 Masangi Byadagi Haveri 2.1 Bydagi 110

816 Savitha Chemicals Siegegudda Kavalu village Belur Hassan 1.25 Chikamagalur

220

817 Happy Valley Developers Siegegudda Kavalu village Belur Hassan 1.25 Chikamagalur

220

818 Khatau Narbheram & Co (Phase-1) Aidahalli kaval Belur Hassan 1.5 Chikamagalur

220

Page 114: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

100 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

819 Khatau Narbheram & Co (Phase-1) Aidahalli kaval Belur Hassan 1.5 Chikamagalur

220

820 Rathnagiri Impex Aidahalli kaval Belur Hassan 1.25 Chikamagalur

220

821 Doodanavar & Brothers Channenadaddi Chikkodi Belgaum 15 Chikkodi 110

822 Vandana Ispat Ltd., Kurumadikere Chitradurga Chitradurga 2.5 Chitradurga 220

823 Kariganur Iron & steels Jogimatti Chitradurga Chitradurga 2.5 Chitradurga 220

824 Raja Magnetics Ltd, Thalya and Horakerer (Jogimatti in Wind

Zone) Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

825 Patel Shanti Steels Pvt. Ltd, Madakaripura Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.23 Chitradurga 220

826 Gangadhar Naringadas Agarwal

(HUF) Kurumardikere Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.25 Chitradurga 220

827 B.S.Chanabasappa & sons Kennedlu, Nandipura Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

828 Enercon Windfarms (India) Ltd., Kenndlu,Chitradurga Chitradurga Chitradurga 4.2 Chitradurga 220

829 Indan Energy Pvt. Ltd (FIZA) kanchiganhall Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.75 Chitradurga 220

830 Jindal Aluminium Ltd. (FIZA) kanchiganhall Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.9 Chitradurga 220

831 Savitha Chemicals Ltd. (NEG) Kanchiganhal Chitradurga Chitradurga 3.8 Chitradurga 220

832 Maris Power Supply Co. Limited

(CWEL)

Kanchiganal (1WTGs)

Madakaripura(6WTGs) Chitradurga Chitradurga 5.25 Chitradurga 220

833 Mansukmahal Pvt., Ltd.,(NEG) Kanchiganal Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.95 Chitradurga 220

834 MSPL-6 (NEG) GRHalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 3.8 Chitradurga 220

835 Shanmuga Compacts (FIZA) Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.75 Chitradurga 220

836 S.Kumar (CWEL) Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.95 Chitradurga 220

837 Ramgad Mineral and mining Pvt.

Ltd-2 (FIZA) G.R.Halli/ Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.75 Chitradurga 220

838 Kariganur Iron & Steel Pvt., Ltd.,

(FIZA) G.R.Halli/ Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.75 Chitradurga 220

839 Victus Associate (FIZA) G.R.Halli/ Gonur Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.75 Chitradurga 220

840 Eswari Garements (FIZA) G.R.Halli Chitradurga Chitradurga 0.75 Chitradurga 220

841 Esawi knittings (FIZA) G.R.Halli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

Page 115: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 101

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

842 MSPL-3(NEG) G.R.Halli Chitradurga Chitradurga 3.8 Chitradurga 220

843 Good luck syndicate. Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

844 Shreyalakshmi and properties Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

845 Defree Engineering P. Ltd., Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

846 B.S.C.Textiles Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Chitradurga 220

847 Siddaganga Oil Extractions Ltd., Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 1.2 Chitradurga 220

848 Indo wind Energy Ltd., Elkurnahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

849 VSL Mining Company (P) Ltd., Elekuranahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

850 VS Lad & Sons Elekuranahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 1.5 Chitradurga 220

851 Leo Fasterners Elakuranahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 3 Chitradurga 220

852 Boruka Power Corporation Ltd.,

(Vestas) Betadarangenahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 2 Chitradurga 220

853 Bellary Iron Ores (P) Ltd., Betadarangenahalli Chitradurga Chitradurga 2.5 Chitradurga 220

854 Atria Wind Power (Bijapur-2) Pvt

Ltd

Bangarakanahalli & Madanayakanahalli

(GE Machine) Chitradurga Chitradurga 23.3 Chitradurga 220

855 National Mineral Development

Corporation Ltd Anehalu Chitradurga Chitradurga 9 Chitradurga 220

856 Bharat Earth Movers Limited Kappatagudda Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Dambal 110

857 Vishwa Vinayaka Minerals Vadegola, Rajur Ron Gadag 0.6 Gajendragad

110

858 Three M Paper manufacturing Ltd Vadegola, Rajur Ron Gadag 0.6 Gajendragad

110

859 RRB Energy Ltd Vadegola Ron Gadag 0.6 Gajendragad

110

860 Orient Steels and Industies Limited Unachageri & Rajur Ron Gadag 0.6 Gajendragad

110

861 Pragathi Aroma oil distillers (P)

Ltd., (SA) Unachagere, Rajur Ron Gadag 1.2

Gajendragad

110

862 Orient Abrasis Ltd Rajur Ron Gadag 0.6 Gajendragad

110

Page 116: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

102 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

863 V.Dodappa Rajur Ron Gadag 0.6 Gajendragad

110

864 B V Finanace & Leasing LTd., Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

865 Mahalaksmi Construction

Corporation Ltd., Lakkihalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

866 P.Mohan Lal., Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Hiryur 220

867 Mineral Enterprises Ltd, Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 1.8 Hiryur 220

868 Laxmi Organic Industries Pvt.,

Ltd., Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Hiryur 220

869 Laxmi Organic Industries. Elladakere Hiriyur Chitradurga 0.6 Hiryur 220

870 Hira Ferro Alloys Kundur Honnali Davangere 1.5 Honnali 220

871 Sargam Retails (P) Ltd - Ph-2 Kudrekonda Honnali Davangere 7.5 Honnali 220

872 Hotel Leelaventures Kudrekonda Honnali Davangere 2.5 Honnali 220

873 Rangamma Steels & Malleables -

LMIL

Timmanahalli, Ramanahalli, Annehalli,

Hagalvadi and mattikere Chikkanayakanahalli Tumkur 0.8 Hiryur 220

874 Gemcraft Hosadurga Hosadurga chitradurga 0.8 Hiryur 220

875 Enercon WindFarms (Hindustan)

(P) Ltd.,JNI Dusudi Hosadurga Chitradurga 24 Hiryur 220

876 Ramgad Minerals & Mining Pvt.

Ltd, Jajikalgudda Harpanahalli Davangere 7.5 Ittagi 220

877 Poonawalla Investments and

industries Private Limited Harapanahalli Harapanahalli Davangere 6.3 Ittagi 220

878 Vikram Trader Halvagalu Harapanahalli Davangere 2.1 Ittagi 220

879 Maris Spinners Limited Halvagalu Harapanahalli Davangere 2.1 Ittagi 220

880 Clean Wind Power (Manvi) Private

Limited Kavithal Manvi Raichur 44 Manvi 110

881 Greenko Bagewadi Wind Energies

Private Limited Salawadigi Basavanababewadi Bijapur 4 Mukarthihal 110

882 Green Infra Wind Power

Generation Limited Ramdurga Ramdurga Belgaum 20 Ramdurga 110

Page 117: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 103

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

883 ReNew Wind Energy (Karnataka)

Pvt Limited Abbigeri Ron Gadag 12 Ron 110

884 Victory Glass And Industries Ltd. Hargapurgad Hukkeri Gadag 0.45 Sankeshwar 110

885 Kirloskar Electric Company Ltd. Hargapurgad Hukkeri Belgaum 2 Sankeshwar 110

886 Gangadhar Narasingdas Agarwal Ayyanahalli Bellary Bellary 1.5 Sankalapur 110

887 East Man Ayyanahalli Bellary Bellary 1.5 Sankalapur 110

888 CLP Wind Farms (India) Pvt Ltd Katamalli & Hooli Saundatti Belgaum 7.2 Saundatti 110

889 CLP Wind Farms (India) Pvt Ltd Goraballa, Basidoni, Sirasangi Saundatti Belgaum 16 Saundatti 110

890 Giriraj Enterprises Bestur Saundatti Belgaum 10.5 Saundatti 110

891 CLP Wind Farms (India) Pvt Ltd Basidoni, Sirasangi Saundatti Belgaum 4.8 Saundatti 110

892 Sterling Agro Industries Limited Sidaganalu Shikaripura Shimoga 3.75 Shikaripura 110

893 Mantri Homes Shiraganahallu Shikaripura Shimoga 1.5 Shikaripura 110

894 Tirupathi Microtech Hirekatte Shikaripura Shimoga 1.25 Shikaripura 110

895 Bright Packaging Pvt Ltd Gangavansara Shikaripura Shimoga 1.25 Shikaripura 110

896 H.G.Rangan Goud (phase-II) Gangavansara Shikaripura Shimoga 1.25 Shikaripura 110

897 Techno Rings Gangavansara Shikaripura Shimoga 1.25 Shikaripura 110

898 Rajastham Gum (P) Limited Gangavansara Shikaripura Shimoga 1.25 Shikaripura 110

899 Sterling Agro Industries Limited Gangavansara Shikaripura Shimoga 2.5 Shikaripura 110

900 Mantri Homes Gangavansara Shikaripura Shimoga 3 Shikaripura 110

901 Rajastham Gum (P) Limited Gangavansara Shikaripura Shimoga 1.5 Shikaripura 110

902 Kalleshwari Refinary (P) Limited Gangavansara Shikaripura Shimoga 1.5 Shikaripura 110

903 M.R.Pasalkar Gangavansara Shikaripura Shimoga 1.25 Shikaripura 110

904 Rajastham Gum (P) Limited Gangavansara Shikaripura Shimoga 1.25 Shikaripura 110

905 Rajastham Gum (P) Limited Gangavansara Shikaripura Shimoga 1.5 Shikaripura 110

906 Mantri Homes Gangavansara Shikaripura Shimoga 1.5 Shikaripura 110

907 Rameshkumar Hanjarimal Rathod Gangavansara Shikaripura Shimoga 1.25 Shikaripura 110

908 Indus Trust Gangarkatte Shikaripura Shimoga 1.5 Shikaripura 110

Page 118: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

104 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

909 Gemscab Industries Solutions Ranathur village in Shirahatti Shiratti Gadag 0.8 Shirhatti 110

910 Prasad Global Solutions Ranathur village in Shirahatti Shiratti Gadag 0.8 Shirhatti 110

911 Protectron Electromech (P) Ltd., Ranathur village in Shirahatti Shiratti Gadag 0.8 Shirhatti 110

912 Fatehpurai Transformer &

Switchgears (P) Ltd., Majjur Shiratti Gadag 0.8 Shirhatti 110

913 Super wind project (P) Ltd Ph-2 Jalavadgi Mundargi Gadag 1.5 Shirhatti 110

914 The Tata Power Company Ltd Hosur, Kanavi & Mulgund Gadag Gadag 4 Shirhatti 110

915 Super wind project (P) Ltd Ph-4 Chaginakere Mundargi Gadag 1.5 Shirhatti 110

916 Bhoruka Power Corporation

Limited Yelisurur Gadag Gadag 15 Shirhatti 110

917 Bhoruka Power Corporation

Limited Yelisurur Gadag Gadag 3 Shirhatti 110

918 Bhoruka Power Corporation

Limited Yelisurur Gadag Gadag 7.5 Shirhatti 110

919 Mysore Engineers (India) Ltd., Sirund village, Gadag taluk, Gadag

district. Gadag Gadag 0.25 Shirhatti 110

920 Fasteners and Allied Products (P)

Ltd.,

Sirund village, Gadag taluk, Gadag

district. Gadag Gadag 0.25 Shirhatti 110

921 Suresh C Angadi Sirund village, Gadag taluk, Gadag

district. Gadag Gadag 0.25 Shirhatti 110

922 Mangal S Angadi Sirund village, Gadag taluk, Gadag

district. Gadag Gadag 0.25 Shirhatti 110

923 C.R.Rajesh Nair Sirund village, Gadag taluk, Gadag

district. Gadag Gadag 0.75 Shirhatti 110

924 Swani Corporation Sirund village, Gadag taluk, Gadag

district. Gadag Gadag 0.25 Shirhatti 110

925 Oswal Woollen Mills Limited Shorgaon Chikkodi Belgaum 0.85 Shirgaon 110

926 Canara PCC Poles Shirogoan Chikkodi Belgaum 0.85 Shirgaon 110

927 NSB Infrastrcture and Projects

Private Limited Shirogoan Chikkodi Belgaum 0.85 Shirgaon 110

928 Chamundeshwari Build Tech (P)

Limited Shirogoan Chikkodi Belgaum 0.85 Shirgaon 110

Page 119: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 105

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

929 KRBL Limited Kalmangi Sindanur Raichur 1.5 Sindhanur 110

930 Fortune Five Hydel Projects (P)

Limited Ingeshwara Basavanababewadi Bijapur 51.2 B Bagewadi 220

931 Matrix Power (Wind) Private

Limited Ingeshwara Basavanababewadi Bijapur 15 B Bagewadi 220

932 Rahul Dravid Machinalli Mundargi Gadag 0.8 Bellahatti 110

933 Goetze (India) Financial Services

Ltd., Gopalpura Hiriyur Chitradurga 9.6

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

934 Eastman International Gopalpura Hassan Hassan 3

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

935 Avon Cycles Ltd Gopalpura Hassan Hassan 1.5

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

936 Hindustan Zinc Limited Gopalpura Hassan Hassan 3

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

937 Hindustan Zinc Limited Gopalpura Hassan Hassan 3

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

938 Simran Wind Power Project (P)

Ltd -Ph-1 Kopalahalli Holenarsipura Hassan 1.5

Hadavahalli

(GOPALPUR)2

20

939 Suresh Kumar Sharma (HUF) Horigeri Mundargi Gadag 1.25 Guttal 110

940 M.K.Agrotech Private Limited Sambapur, Papanashini and Adavisomapur Gadag Gadag 8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

941 Hindustan Zinc Limited Kurthkoti, Harti Gadag Gadag 8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

942 Hindustan Zinc Limited Kurthkoti, Harti Gadag Gadag 8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

943 Generacion Eolica India (P) Ltd Kurthkoti, Harti Gadag Gadag 8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

Page 120: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

106 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

944 Belgaum Wind Farms (P) Ltd Kurthkoti, Asundi, Binkadakatte &

Hulkoti Gadag Gadag 1.6

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

945 Belgaum Wind Farms (P) Ltd Kurthkoti, Asundi, Binkadakatte &

Hulkoti Gadag Gadag 2.4

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

946 Belgaum Wind Farms (P) Ltd Kurthkoti, Asundi, Binkadakatte &

Hulkoti Gadag Gadag 4

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

947 The Tata Power Company Ltd Kanavi, Harthi & Mulgund villages Gadag Gadag 8 Enercon

(Harthi) 220

948 Maris Power Supply Company

Private Limited Adavisomapura and Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 0.8

Enercon

(Harthi) 220

949 Hindustan Zinc Limited Chudanhalli Hassan Hassan 3 Hassan 220

950 MSPL Sogi Huvinahadagalli Bellary 18.75 Ittagi 220

951 VS Lad & Sons Gujanur Huvinahadagalli Bellary 3.75 Ittagi 220

952 Mahalaksmi Commercial Services Gujanur Huvinahadagalli Bellary 1.25 Ittagi 220

953 Abhishek Exports India Pvt Ltd Gangavansara Honnali Davangere 2.5 Honnali 220

954 KRBL Limited (KAL-20) Kalmangi Gangavathi Koppal 1.5 Sindhanur 110

955 Renew Wind Power (Karnataka)

Pvt Limited Tadas Kundgola Dharwad 4.8 Bidnal 220

956 Sameera Trading Company Ayyanahalli Bellary Bellary 1.5 Sankalapur 110

957 The Tata power company Ltd Hosur, Kanavi & Mulgund Gadag Gadag 0.8 Shirhatti 110

958 Vijayananda Road Lines Ltd.,

(Phase-1) Hirevadatti Mundargi Gadag 2.5 Dambal 110

Page 121: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 107

Details of Existing KPTCL Substations

Table 19: Details of KPTCL substation as on March 31, 2017

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

1 Hosur SHIKARPUR SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

2 Jade SORBA SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

3 Sarjapura ANEKAL BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66 100 2 200

4 APMC Yard Raichur RAICHUR RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

5 Chikkasugur RAICHUR RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

6 Maliyabad RAICHUR RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

7 Vadavatti RAICHUR RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

8 Matamari MANVI RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

9 K R pet KRISHNARUJPET Mandya Mysore 220 / 66 100 2 200

10 Deodurga DEVADURGA RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

11 Gabbur DEVADURGA RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

12 Shahapur SHAHPUR YADGIR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

220 / 110 100 2 200

13 Gowribidanur GOWRIBIDANUR CHIKBALLAPUR Bengaluru

Rural 220 / 66 100 2 200

14 Kembhavi SHORAPUR YADGIR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

15 Shahapur SHAHPUR YADGIR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

Page 122: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

108 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

16 Shorapur SHORAPUR YADGIR Gulbarga

110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

20 1 20

17 Yadgiri YADGIR YADGIR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

18 Konkal YADGIR YADGIR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 20 1 20

19 Gurmatkal YADGIR YADGIR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

20 Sedam SEDAM KALABURAGI Gulbarga

110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

220 / 110 100 2 200

21 Channarayapatna CHANNARAYAPATNA HASSAN Hassan 220 / 66 100 2 200

22 Vadagera JEVARGI KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 20 1 20

23 Saidapur K YADGIR YADGIR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

24 Khanapur SH SHAHPUR YADGIR Gulbarga 110 / 11

5 1 5

10 1 10

110 / 33 20 1 20

25 Shahabad CHITAPUR KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 20 2 40

220 / 110 100 2 200

26 Anchepalya KUNIGAL TUMAKURU Tumkur 220 / 66 100 2 200

27 Chitapur CHITAPUR KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

28 Korwar temple CHITAPUR KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 10 1 10

29 Jevargi JEVARGI KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

Page 123: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 109

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

30 Bidadi RAMANAGARAM RAMNAGAR Bengaluru

Rural 220 / 66 100 2 200

31 Nalwar CHITAPUR KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 10 1 10

32 Wadi CHITAPUR KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

33 Farhatabad KALABURAGI KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

34 Gulbarga South KALABURAGI KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

20 1 20

35 Gulbarga West KALABURAGI KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

36 Kapnoor KALABURAGI KALABURAGI Gulbarga 220 / 110 100 2 200

37 Gulbarga North KALABURAGI KALABURAGI Gulbarga

110 / 11 20 2 40

110 / 33 10 1 10

20 1 20

38 Gulbarga (U) KALABURAGI KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

39 Nittur GUBBI TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 20 2 40

220 / 110 100 2 200

40 Kapnoor KALABURAGI KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

41 Mandewali JEVARGI KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 20 1 20

42 Madiyal ALAND KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

43 Chowdapur AFZALPUR KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 20 1 20

44 Afzalpur AFZALPUR KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 3 30

110 / 33 20 1 20

45 Karajgi AFZALPUR KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

Page 124: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

110 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

46 Devangaon SINDGI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

47 Betagera GADAG GADAG Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

48 HSR layout BENGALURU SOUTH BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66

100 1 100

150 2 300

49 Kurkunta SEDAM KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

50 Chincholi CHINCHOLI KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 20 1 20

51 Yedrami JEVARGI KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 10 1 10

52 Kadaganchi ALAND KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

53 Aland ALAND KALABURAGI Gulbarga

110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

20 1 20

54 Kanakapura KANAKAPURA RAMNAGAR Bengaluru

Rural 220 / 66 100 1 100

55 Mahagaon KALABURAGI KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 10 1 10

56 Margutti cross KALABURAGI KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

57 Humnabad HUMNABAD BIDAR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

220 / 110 100 2 200

58 Chittaguppa HUMNABAD BIDAR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

59 Humnabad HUMNABAD BIDAR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 4 40

60 Antharasanahalli TUMAKURU TUMAKURU Tumkur 220 / 66 100 2 200

61 Manna-ek-halli HUMNABAD BIDAR Gulbarga

110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

20 1 20

Page 125: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 111

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

62 Hallikheda HUMNABAD BIDAR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

63 Kamathana BIDAR BIDAR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 20 1 20

64 Habsikote BIDAR BIDAR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

65 Chidri BIDAR BIDAR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 3 30

66 Kolhar BIDAR BIDAR Gulbarga 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

67 Janawad BIDAR BIDAR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 20 1 20

68 Halabarga BHALKI BIDAR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

220 / 110 100 2 200

69 Rajeshwar BASAVAKALYAN BIDAR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

70 Mantala BASAVAKALYAN BIDAR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

71 Torekadanahalli MALAVALLI Mandya Mysore 220 / 66 100 2 200

72 Sasthapur BASAVAKALYAN BIDAR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 2 20

73 Bhalki BHALKI BIDAR Gulbarga 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

74 Ladha BHALKI BIDAR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 20 1 20

75 Kibbanahalli TIPTUR TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 2 20

220 / 110 100 2 200

76 Santhapur AURAD BIDAR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

Page 126: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

112 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

110 / 33 20 1 20

77 Dongergaon AURAD BIDAR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 20 1 20

78 Kamalnagar AURAD BIDAR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 20 1 20

79 Turvihal SINDHNUR RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 10 1 10

80 Hanamanal HUNGUND BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

81 Metri HOSAPETE BALLARI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

82 Halkundi BALLARI BALLARI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

83 Shaktinagar RAICHUR RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

84 Kerehalli KOPPAL KOPPAL Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

85 Shiggaon SHIGGAON HAVERI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

86 Tumminakatte RANIBENNURU HAVERI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

87 Bidi KHANAPUR BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

88 Suvarnasoudha BELAGAVI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

89 Jambagi K D ATHNI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

90 Bisnal SINDGI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

91 Madhuvanahally KOLLEGALA CHAMARAJANAG

AR Mysore 220 / 66 100 2 200

92 Itanal RAYBAG BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

93 Chandakavate SINDGI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

94 Kulageri cross BADAMI BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

95 Aski SINDGI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

96 UAS Dharwad DHARWAD DHARWAD Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

97 Daddi HUKERI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

Page 127: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 113

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

98 Guttur HARIHAR DAVANGERE Tumkur 400 / 220 315 2 630

99 Sultanpur RAYBAG BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

100 Kagwada ATHNI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

101 Alabal JAMKHANDI BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

102 Yalparatti BASAVANA

BAGEVADI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

103 Mantur MUDHOL BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

104 Hassan HASSAN HASSAN Hassan 220 / 66 100 2 200

105 Kuditini BALLARI BALLARI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

106 Basthipura (Mysore) SHRIRANGAPATTANA Mandya Mysore 400 / 220 315 2 630

500 1 500

107 Bidadi PGCIL RAMANAGARAM RAMNAGAR Bengaluru

Rural 400 / 220 500 2 1000

108 Tumkur (New

Madhugiri) TUMAKURU TUMAKURU Tumkur 400 / 220 500 2 1000

109 Khodays BENGALURU SOUTH BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66 100 2 200

110 Magadi MAGADI RAMNAGAR Bengaluru

Rural 220 / 66 100 2 200

111 Nelamangla NELAMANGALA BENGALURU

RURAL

Bengaluru

Rural 400 / 220 500 3 1500

112 Kolar PGCIL KOLAR KOLAR Bengaluru

Rural 400 / 220 500 2 1000

113 Kuduchi RAYBAG BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

220 / 110 100 2 200

114 Somanahalli PGCIL BENGALURU SOUTH BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 400 / 220 500 3 1500

115 RTPS RAICHUR RAICHUR Gulbarga 400 / 220 315 2 630

500 1 500

116 Raichur New RAICHUR RAICHUR Gulbarga 765 / 400 1500 2 3000

117 Kadavinakote HOLE NARASIPURA HASSAN Hassan 220 / 66 100 2 200

Page 128: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

114 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

118 Kudgi BASAVANA

BAGEVADI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot

400 / 21 941 3 2823

400 / 220 500 2 1000

119 Kudgi New BASAVANA

BAGEVADI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 765 / 400 1500 2 3000

120 Hoody BENGALURU EAST BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban

220 / 66 100 4 400

400 / 220 500 3 1500

121 Keregodi TIPTUR TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 1 10

122 Talakere MADHUGIRI TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 1 10

123 Bidare GUBBI TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 1 10

124 Arsikere ARASIKERE HASSAN Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

220 / 110 100 2 200

125 BTPS 400 BALLARI BALLARI Gulbarga 400 / 220 315 1 315

126 Ghattaprabha HUKERI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

127 Kaiga KARWAR UTTAR KANNADA Bagalkot 400 / 220 315 2 630

128 Chikkamagalur CHIKKAMAGALURU CHIKKAMAGALU

RU Hassan 220 / 66 100 2 200

129 Mallapura ARASIKERE HASSAN Hassan 110 / 11 5.2 2 10.4

10 1 10

130 Munirabad KOPPAL KOPPAL Gulbarga

110 / 33 10 2 20

110 / 66 20 2 40

220 / 110 100 2 200

131 Naganathapura BENGALURU SOUTH BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66 100 2 200

132 Kadur KADUR CHIKKAMAGALU

RU Hassan

110 / 11 10 2 20

220 / 110 100 2 200

133 Yelahanka BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66 150 2 300

134 Gajanur SHIVAMOGGA SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

Page 129: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 115

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

135 UPCL UDUPI UDUPI Hassan 400 / 220 315 2 630

136 Malghan (near Indi) SINDGI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

137 Kavoor MANGALURU DAKSHIN

KANNADA Hassan

110 / 11 20 2 40

110 / 33 20 2 40

220 / 110 100 3 300

138 Belgaum BELAGAVI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

139 Kothipura KUNIGAL TUMAKURU Tumkur 220 / 66 100 2 200

140 Mittemari BAGEPALLI CHIKBALLAPUR Bengaluru

Rural 220 / 66 100 2 200

141 Mallat MANVI RAICHUR Gulbarga 220 / 110 100 2 200

142 Devaragennur VIJAYAPURA VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

143 Dhoni MUNDARGI GADAG Bagalkot 400 / 220 500 2 1000

144 Halaki MUDHOL BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

145 Hiremasali INDI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

146 Khadakalat CHIKODI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

147 Morab NAVALGUND DHARWAD Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

148 Tolamatti BILGI BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

149 Jigani ANEKAL BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66 150 2 300

150 Belagumba ARASIKERE HASSAN Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

151 Karkala KARKAL UDUPI Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

152 Hosanagara HOSANAGARA SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

153 Ghattarga AFZALPUR KALABURAGI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

154 Muddapura HOLALKERE CHITRADURGA Tumkur 110 / 11 10 1 10

155 Yeragera RAICHUR RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

156 Chintamani CHINTAMANI CHIKBALLAPUR Bengaluru

Rural 220 / 66 100 3 300

157 Pavagada PAVAGADA TUMAKURU Tumkur 220 / 66 100 2 200

Page 130: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

116 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

158 Pavagada Pooling station PAVAGADA TUMAKURU Tumkur 400 / 220 500 3 1500

159 Puttur 220 PUTTUR DAKSHIN

KANNADA Hassan

110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 20 1 20

220 / 110 100 2 200

160 MSEZ MANGALURU DAKSHIN

KANNADA Hassan

110 / 11 20 2 40

220 / 110 100 2 200

161 Shivamogga SHIVAMOGGA SHIVAMOGGA Hassan

110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 66 20 4 80

220 / 110 100 3 300

162 NIMHANS BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66 150 2 300

163 Talaguppa SAGAR SHIVAMOGGA Hassan

110 / 11 10 2 20

220 / 110 100 2 200

400 / 220 315 3 945

164 Balligavi SHIKARPUR SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

220 / 110 100 2 200

165 Kemar KARKAL UDUPI Hassan 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

220 / 110 100 3 300

166 Kulshekara MANGALURU DAKSHIN

KANNADA Hassan

110 / 11 20 1 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

167 Somanahalli BENGALURU SOUTH BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66

100 2 200

150 1 150

168 Konaje MANGALURU DAKSHIN

KANNADA Hassan

110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

169 Bantawal BUNTWAL DAKSHIN

KANNADA Hassan

110 / 11 20 2 40

110 / 33 10 1 10

Page 131: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 117

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

170 Salethur BUNTWAL DAKSHIN

KANNADA Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

171 Vittla BUNTWAL DAKSHIN

KANNADA Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

172 Puttur 110 PUTTUR DAKSHIN

KANNADA Hassan

110 / 11 20 2 40

110 / 33 20 2 40

173 Karaya 110 BELTHANGADI DAKSHIN

KANNADA Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

174 Baikampady MANGALURU DAKSHIN

KANNADA Hassan

110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

175 Gurupur MANGALURU DAKSHIN

KANNADA Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

176 Moodabidre MANGALURU DAKSHIN

KANNADA Hassan 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

177 Guruvankere BELTHANGADI DAKSHIN

KANNADA Hassan

110 / 11 20 2 40

110 / 33 20 2 40

178 Nandikur UDUPI UDUPI Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

179 Davangere DAVANGERE DAVANGERE Tumkur 220 / 66 60 1 60

100 2 200

180 Manipal UDUPI UDUPI Hassan

110 / 11 20 2 40

110 / 33 10 1 10

20 1 20

181 Nittur HOSANAGARA SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

182 Brahmavara UDUPI UDUPI Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

183 Hiriyadaka UDUPI UDUPI Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 10 2 20

184 Madhuvana UDUPI UDUPI Hassan 110 / 11 20 1 20

Page 132: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

118 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

185 Kundapura KUNDAPURA UDUPI Hassan 110 / 11 20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

186 Navuda KUNDAPURA UDUPI Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 10 1 10

187 Halady KUNDAPURA UDUPI Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

188 Hosangadi KUNDAPURA UDUPI Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 20 1 20

189 Hulikal HOSANAGARA SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 5 1 5

110 / 33 10 1 10

190 Kammaradi KOPPA CHIKKAMAGALU

RU Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

191 Thirthahalli THIRTHAHALLI SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 3 30

192 Muthinakoppa NARASIMHARAJAPUR

A

CHIKKAMAGALU

RU Hassan

110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

193 Subramanyapura BENGALURU SOUTH BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66

100 1 100

150 2 300

194 Mandali SHIVAMOGGA SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

195 Alkola SHIVAMOGGA SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 3 30

196 Kumshi SHIVAMOGGA SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

197 Anandapur SAGAR SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

198 Sagar SAGAR SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

199 Soraba SORBA SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

200 Shiralkoppa SHIKARPUR SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

201 Issuru CHITRADURGA CHITRADURGA Tumkur 110 / 11 10 2 20

Page 133: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 119

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

202 Shikaripura SHIKARPUR SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

203 Kittadahalli SHIKARPUR SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

204 Togarsi SHIKARPUR SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

205 Barangi SORBA SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

206 Anavatti SORBA SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

207 Jog SAGAR SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 5 2 10

110 / 33 10 1 10

208 Chandragutti SORBA SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

209 Manchenahalli BHADRAVATHI SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 20 2 40

210 Bhadravathi BHADRAVATHI SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

211 Birur KADUR CHIKKAMAGALU

RU Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

212 EPIP BENGALURU EAST BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66 150 2 300

213 Neralakere TARIKERE CHIKKAMAGALU

RU Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

214 Shivapura TARIKERE CHIKKAMAGALU

RU Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

215 Tarikere TARIKERE CHIKKAMAGALU

RU Hassan 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

216 Tangli KADUR CHIKKAMAGALU

RU Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

217 Yagatipura KADUR CHIKKAMAGALU

RU Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

218 Sinagatgere KADUR CHIKKAMAGALU

RU Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

219 Hirenallur THIRTHAHALLI SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

Page 134: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

120 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

220 Ajjampura TARIKERE CHIKKAMAGALU

RU Hassan 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

221 Shivani TARIKERE CHIKKAMAGALU

RU Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

222 Nagenahalli KADUR CHIKKAMAGALU

RU Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

223 Nidaghatta MALAVALLI Mandya Mysore 110 / 11 10 1 10

224 Javagal ARASIKERE HASSAN Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

225 Shantigrama HASSAN HASSAN Hassan 400 / 220 315 2 630

226 Banavara ARASIKERE HASSAN Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

227 Kallusadarahalli ARASIKERE HASSAN Hassan 110 / 11 10 1 10

228 Gerumara ARASIKERE HASSAN Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

229 Gandsi ARASIKERE HASSAN Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

230 Somalapur SINDHNUR RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

231 Kondenalu ARASIKERE HASSAN Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

232 Dodda Metikurke ARASIKERE HASSAN Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

234 Bejai MANGALURU DAKSHIN

KANNADA Hassan

110 / 11 20 1 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

235 Gubbi GUBBI TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 3 30

236 HAL BENGALURU SOUTH BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66 150 2 300

237 Kadaba SIDLAGHATTA CHIKBALLAPUR Bengaluru

Rural 110 / 11 10 2 20

238 K G Temple GUBBI TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 2 20

239 Ungra GUBBI TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 2 20

240 Kallur GUBBI TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 2 20

241 Doddaguni GUBBI TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 2 20

242 Sampige TURUVEKERE TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 2 20

243 Ammasandra TURUVEKERE TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 3 30

Page 135: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 121

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

244 Novinakere TIPTUR TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 2 20

245 Turuvekere TURUVEKERE TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

246 Mayasandra TURUVEKERE TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

247 Kadehally (Dabbeghatta) CHIKNAYAKANHALLI TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 2 20

248 Chikkanayakanahalli CHIKNAYAKANHALLI TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 2 20

249 Thimmanahalli CHIKNAYAKANHALLI TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 2 20

250 Neelagunda HARPANAHALLI DAVANGERE Tumkur 220 / 66 100 2 200

251 Shettigere CHIKNAYAKANHALLI TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 2 20

252 Huliyar CHIKNAYAKANHALLI TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 2 20

253 Hadanakere CHIKNAYAKANHALLI TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 2 20

254 Bandihalli TIPTUR TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 2 20

255 Tiptur TIPTUR TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 3 30

256 Halukurke TIPTUR TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 1 10

257 Murdeshwar BHATKAL UTTAR KANNADA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 10 2 20

258 Honnavalli TIPTUR TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 2 20

259 Hunaseghatta TIPTUR TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 2 20

260 Honnavara HONAVAR UTTAR KANNADA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

261 Kumta KUMTA UTTAR KANNADA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

262 Siddapura DAVANGERE DAVANGERE Tumkur 110 / 11 5 1 5

10 1 10

263 Sirsi SIRSI UTTAR KANNADA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 3 30

220 / 110 50 1 50

Page 136: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

122 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

264 Ankola ANKOLA UTTAR KANNADA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 10 2 20

265 Arga KARWAR UTTAR KANNADA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

266 Karwar KARWAR UTTAR KANNADA Bagalkot

110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 20 1 20

220 / 110 100 2 200

267 Ambewadi HALIYAL UTTAR KANNADA Bagalkot 110 / 11 20 2 40

220 / 110 100 2 200

268 Bidnal HUBBALLI DHARWAD Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

220 / 110 100 2 200

269 Hootagalli MYSURU MYSURU Mysore 220 / 66 100 3 300

270 SRS Hubli DHARWAD DHARWAD Bagalkot

110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

220 / 110 100 3 300

271 Ganesh gudi JOIDA(SUPA) UTTAR KANNADA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 10 1 10

272 Anmod JOIDA(SUPA) UTTAR KANNADA Bagalkot 110 / 11 5 1 5

273 Sanda SHIKARPUR SHIVAMOGGA Hassan 110 / 11 10 2 20

274 Tandaga TURUVEKERE TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 1 10

275 Gungurumale TIPTUR TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 1 10

276 Haliyal HALIYAL UTTAR KANNADA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

277 Kavalwad HALIYAL UTTAR KANNADA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

278 Kadanakoppa KALGHATGI DHARWAD Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 20 1 20

279 Kalghatgi KALGHATGI DHARWAD Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 3 30

280 Kiravatti SIRSI UTTAR KANNADA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

Page 137: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 123

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

110 / 33 20 1 20

281 Umachagi YELLAPUR UTTAR KANNADA Bagalkot 110 / 11 5 1 5

282 Tarihal HUBBALLI DHARWAD Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

283 Tadasinakoppa DHARWAD DHARWAD Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

284 Navanagar (Dharwad) HUBBALLI DHARWAD Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

285 Lakamanahalli DHARWAD DHARWAD Bagalkot

110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

20 1 20

286 Narendra DHARWAD DHARWAD Bagalkot 220 / 110 100 2 200

287 KUD Dharwad DHARWAD DHARWAD Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

288 Mruthyanjayanagar DHARWAD DHARWAD Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

289 Goppanakoppa HUBBALLI DHARWAD Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 2 20

290 Gadag road GADAG GADAG Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

291 Navalgund NAVALGUND DHARWAD Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

292 Anandanagar HUBBALLI DHARWAD Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

293 Chitradurga CHITRADURGA CHITRADURGA Tumkur 220 / 66 100 3 300

294 Aakshay colony HUBBALLI DHARWAD Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 10 1 10

295 PH Compound HUBBALLI DHARWAD Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

296 Saundatti SAVADATTI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

220 / 110 100 2 200

297 Saundatti SAVADATTI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11

5 1 5

10 1 10

110 / 33 10 1 10

Page 138: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

124 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

20 1 20

298 A-Station BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66 150 2 300

299 Annigeri NAVALGUND DHARWAD Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

300 Gadag GADAG GADAG Bagalkot

110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

220 / 110 100 3 300

301 Gadag bettigere GADAG GADAG Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

302 Naregal RON GADAG Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

304 Ron RON GADAG Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

305 Hirehal RON GADAG Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 10 1 10

306 Badami BADAMI BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

307 Gajendragad RON GADAG Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

308 Sambapur GADAG GADAG Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

309 Dambala MUNDARGI GADAG Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 10 1 10

310 Mundargi MUNDARGI GADAG Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

311 Hebbal BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66 100 2 200

312 Shirahatti SHIRHATTI GADAG Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

313 Lakshmeshwar SHIRHATTI GADAG Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

314 Bellatti SHIRHATTI GADAG Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

Page 139: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 125

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

110 / 33 20 1 20

315 Ramankoppa KUNDGOL DHARWAD Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

316 Mundgod MUNDGOD UTTAR KANNADA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

317 Savanur SAVANUR HAVERI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

318 Haveri 110 HAVERI HAVERI Bagalkot 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 10 2 20

319 Haveri 220 HAVERI HAVERI Bagalkot 220 / 110 100 2 200

320 Hangal HANGAL HAVERI Bagalkot

110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 10 1 10

20 2 40

321 Tiluvali HANGAL HAVERI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

322 Byadgi BYADGI HAVERI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

323 Honnali HONNALI DAVANGERE Tumkur 220 / 66 100 2 200

324 Ranebennur RANIBENNURU HAVERI Bagalkot

110 / 11 10 3 30

110 / 33 20 2 40

220 / 110 100 2 200

325 Hirekerur HIREKERUR HAVERI Bagalkot 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

326 NRS (New Receiving

Station) BENGALURU NORTH

BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66 100 2 200

327 Rattihalli HIREKERUR HAVERI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

328 Aremallapur RANIBENNURU HAVERI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

Page 140: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

126 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

110 / 33 20 1 20

329 Guttal HAVERI HAVERI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

330 Narendra PGCIL DHARWAD DHARWAD Bagalkot 400 / 220 500 2 1000

331 Beluria BADAMI BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 3 30

110 / 33 20 2 40

332 Kittur BAILHONGAL BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

333 M K Hubli 220 BAILHONGAL BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

220 / 110 100 2 200

334 Bailhongal BAILHONGAL BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

335 Hiriyur PGCIL HIRIYUR CHITRADURGA Tumkur 400 / 220 315 2 630

336 Khanapur MK KHANAPUR BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

337 Hirebagewadi BELAGAVI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

338 Udayambagh BELAGAVI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 3 30

339 Uchagaon BELAGAVI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

340 East division company BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66 150 2 300

341 Mache KHANAPUR BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

342 Belgaum BELAGAVI BELAGAVI Bagalkot

110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

220 / 110 100 2 200

343 Ankalagi GOKAK BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

344 Vadagaon BELAGAVI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 3 30

Page 141: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 127

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

345 Kanabargi BELAGAVI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

346 Hattargi HUKERI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

347 Kadakola MYSURU MYSURU Mysore 220 / 66 100 2 200

348 Hukkeri HUKERI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

349 Hidkal Dam HUKERI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

350 Ghattaprabha GOKAK BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 33 10 2 20

20 1 20

351 Shirgaon HUKERI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

352 Kushtagi KUSHTAGI KOPPAL Gulbarga

110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

220 / 110 100 2 200

353 Kabbur CHIKODI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

354 Hunsihal BELAGAVI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

356 Peenya BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66

67.5 1 67.5

150 3 450

357 Mudalagi GOKAK BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 3 30

358 Kuligod RAYBAG BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 3 30

110 / 33 20 1 20

359 Saidapur M DAVANGERE DAVANGERE Tumkur 110 / 11 10 2 20

360 Dhavaleshwara GOKAK BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

361 Mahalingapura MUDHOL BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

Page 142: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

128 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

220 / 110 100 3 300

362 Thallak CHALLAKERE CHITRADURGA Tumkur 220 / 66 100 2 200

363 Sankeshwar HUKERI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

364 Chikkodi 110 CHIKODI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

365 Chikkodi 220 CHIKODI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 220 / 110 100 2 200

366 Nippani CHIKODI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

367 Nanadi CHIKODI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

368 Bhoj CHIKODI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

369 Sadalga CHIKODI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

370 Borgaon CHIKODI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

371 Ankali CHIKODI BELAGAVI Bagalkot

110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

20 1 20

372 Raibag RAYBAG BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

20 1 20

373 Hidkal HUKERI BELAGAVI Bagalkot

110 / 11 20 2 40

110 / 33 10 1 10

20 1 20

Page 143: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 129

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

374 Ranna Belagali MUDHOL BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

375 Uttur MUDHOL BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

376 Vrushabhavathi BENGALURU SOUTH BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66 150 2 300

377 Mudhol MUDHOL BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

378 Manthur MUDHOL BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

379 Vajramatti MUDHOL BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

380 Vajramatti MUDHOL BAGALKOT Bagalkot 220 / 110 100 2 200

381 Melligere MUDHOL BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

382 Lokapur MUDHOL BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 3 30

110 / 33 20 1 20

383 Salahalli RAMDURG BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

384 Katharki HUKERI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

385 Chamarajanagara CHAMARAJANAGAR CHAMARAJANAG

AR Mysore 220 / 66 100 2 200

386 Neerbudihal BADAMI BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

387 Bagalkot BADAMI BAGALKOT Bagalkot

110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 20 1 20

220 / 110 100 2 200

388 Kaladgi BAGALKOT BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 3 30

389 Kerur BADAMI BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 20 1 20

110 / 33 10 2 20

Page 144: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

130 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

390 Konnur GOKAK BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

391 Nargund NARGUND GADAG Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

392 Ramdurga RAMDURG BELAGAVI Bagalkot

110 / 11 20 1 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

20 1 20

393 Guledgudda BADAMI BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

394 Navanagar BAGALKOT BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

395 Vajamangala MYSURU MYSURU Mysore 220 / 66 75 1 75

100 1 100

396 Bagalkot BAGALKOT BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

397 Udakeri BAILHONGAL BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

398 Munavalli SAVADATTI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

399 Hiriyur HIRIYUR CHITRADURGA Tumkur 220 / 66 100 3 300

400 Yaragatti SAVADATTI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

401 Katakol RAMDURG BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

402 Terdal JAMKHANDI BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

403 Kudachi RAYBAG BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 3 30

110 / 33 20 2 40

404 Yerandenahally ANEKAL BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66 100 3 300

405 Ugar Khurd ATHNI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

Page 145: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 131

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

406 Ainapur ATHNI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

407 Shiraguppi BAGALKOT BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

408 Athani ATHNI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

220 / 110 100 2 200

409 Athani ATHNI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 20 1 20

110 / 33 20 3 60

410 Tanvashi ATHNI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

411 Aigali ATHNI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

412 Yallammanawadi ATHNI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

413 Savalgi JAMKHANDI BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

414 Todalbagi JAMKHANDI BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 3 30

110 / 33 20 1 20

415 Mamadapura CHIKODI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

416 Bableshwara VIJAYAPURA VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

417 Shirbur VIJAYAPURA VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

418 Basavana Bagewadi BASAVANA

BAGEVADI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot

110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

220 / 110 100 2 200

419 Malghan (near

B.Bagewadi)

BASAVANA

BAGEVADI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

420 Mattihal VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

Page 146: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

132 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

BASAVANA

BAGEVADI 110 / 33 20 1 20

421 Giri Sagar BILGI BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

422 Bilagi BILGI BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

423 Rabkavi JAMKHANDI BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

424 Satti ATHNI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

425 Banahatti JAMKHANDI BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

426 Hoskote HOSKOTE BENGALURU

RURAL

Bengaluru

Rural 220 / 66 100 2 200

427 Jamakhandi JAMKHANDI BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 3 30

110 / 33 10 2 20

428 Shirol NARGUND GADAG Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

429 Mundaganur BILGI BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

430 Mareguddi JAMKHANDI BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

431 Rampur CHIKODI BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

432 Sigikere BAGALKOT BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

433 Nidagundi RON GADAG Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

434 Mukarthihal BASAVANA

BAGEVADI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

435 Madhugiri MADHUGIRI TUMAKURU Tumkur 220 / 66 100 2 200

436 Achanur BAGALKOT BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

437 Muddebihal MUDDEBIHAL VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

Page 147: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 133

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

438 Kudala sangama MUDDEBIHAL VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

439 Hunagunda HUNGUND BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

440 Ilkal HUNGUND BAGALKOT Bagalkot 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

441 Bijapur 220 VIJAYAPURA VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

220 / 110 100 2 200

442 Bijapur (KIADB) VIJAYAPURA VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

443 Bijapur City VIJAYAPURA VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

20 1 20

444 Dabaspet NELAMANGALA BENGALURU

RURAL

Bengaluru

Rural 220 / 66 100 2 200

445 Bhutnal VIJAYAPURA VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

446 Toravi VIJAYAPURA VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

447 Tekkalaki VIJAYAPURA VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

448 Tikota VIJAYAPURA VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

449 Indi 220 INDI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

220 / 110 100 2 200

450 Atharga INDI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

451 Indi 110 INDI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot

110 / 11 10 3 30

110 / 33 10 1 10

20 1 20

452 Kushalnagara SOMVARPET KODAGU Mysore 220 / 66 100 2 200

453 Hirebevanur INDI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

Page 148: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

134 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

454 Lachayan INDI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

455 Zhalki INDI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot

110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

20 1 20

456 Chadachan INDI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

457 Ghataprabha GOKAK BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

220 / 110 100 2 200

458 Devarahipparagi SINDGI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

459 Sindagi SINDGI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot

110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

20 1 20

460 Doddaballapura DODDABALLAPUR BENGALURU

RURAL

Bengaluru

Rural 220 / 66 100 2 200

461 Almel SINDGI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

462 Mortagi SINDGI VIJAYAPURA Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 1 10

463 Gokak GOKAK BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

464 Mamadapur GOKAK BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

465 Ittagi HUVVINAHADAGALI BALLARI Gulbarga 220 / 66 100 2 200

466 Koppal KOPPAL KOPPAL Gulbarga 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

467 Ginigera KOPPAL KOPPAL Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

468 Guddadahalli KOPPAL KOPPAL Gulbarga 400 / 220 315 2 630

469 Bevoor YALBURGA KOPPAL Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

Page 149: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 135

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

110 / 33 20 1 20

470 Ganadhal YALBURGA KOPPAL Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

471 Kanakagiri GANGAVATI KOPPAL Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

472 KIADB Doddaballapura BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66 50 1 50

473 Yelburga YALBURGA KOPPAL Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

474 Hanumasagar KUSHTAGI KOPPAL Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

475 Hiregonnagar KUSHTAGI KOPPAL Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 10 1 10

476 Lingasugur LINGA SUGUR

(MUDGAL) RAICHUR Gulbarga

110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 10 2 20

20 1 20

220 / 110 100 1 100

477 Gurugunta LINGA SUGUR

(MUDGAL) RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

478 Mudgal LINGA SUGUR

(MUDGAL) RAICHUR Gulbarga

110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

479 Tubinakere MANDYA Mandya Mysore 220 / 66 100 2 200

480 Hatti LINGA SUGUR

(MUDGAL) RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11

10 2 20

20 1 20

481 Donimalai SANDUR BALLARI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 20 1 20

482 Sanklapur HOSAPETE BALLARI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

483 Kamalapura HOSAPETE BALLARI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

Page 150: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

136 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

484 BIAL Begur BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU

URBAN

Bengaluru

Urban 220 / 66 100 2 200

485 Katrikehal CHIKNAYAKANHALLI TUMAKURU Tumkur 110 / 11 10 1 10

486 Alipura BALLARI BALLARI Gulbarga 110 / 11 20 2 40

220 / 110 100 2 200

487 Toranagallu SANDUR BALLARI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

488 Kurugodu BALLARI BALLARI Gulbarga 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 10 1 10

489 Somasamudra BALLARI BALLARI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 10 1 10

490 Bellary (N) BALLARI BALLARI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

20 1 20

491 Ananthpur Road

(Bisilahalli) BALLARI BALLARI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

492 Kolar KP KOLAR KOLAR Bengaluru

Rural 220 / 66 100 2 200

493 Bellary (S) BALLARI BALLARI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

494 Moka BALLARI BALLARI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 11 20 1 20

495 Paramadevana halli BALLARI BALLARI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

496 Venkatagiri GANGAVATI KOPPAL Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

497 Gangavathi DEVADURGA RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 20 2 40

110 / 33 20 1 20

498 Sriramnagar GANGAVATI KOPPAL Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

499 Karatagi GANGAVATI KOPPAL Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

500 Sindhanoor SINDHNUR RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

220 / 110 100 2 200

Page 151: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 137

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

501 Kampli HOSAPETE BALLARI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

502 Mukund SINDHNUR RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

503 Sirwar MANVI RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

504 Sindhanur SINDHNUR RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 2 40

505 Dadesugur SINDHNUR RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

506 Siruguppa SIRUGUPPA BALLARI Gulbarga 110 / 11

10 1 10

20 1 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

507 Tekkalkote SIRUGUPPA BALLARI Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

508 Maski LINGA SUGUR

(MUDGAL) RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

509 Kavital MANVI RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

510 Malur MALUR KOLAR Bengaluru

Rural 220 / 66 100 2 200

511 Walkamdinni SINDHNUR RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 3 30

512 Byagwat MANVI RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

513 Alkod DEVADURGA RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

514 Galaga DEVADURGA RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

515 Manvi MANVI RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

516 Madalapur MANVI RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 2 20

517 Kurdi cross MANVI RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

110 / 33 20 1 20

518 Raichur RAICHUR RAICHUR Gulbarga 110 / 11 10 1 10

20 1 20

Page 152: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

138 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Substation Name Taluk District Zone Voltage

(kV)

Unit

capacity

(MVA)

No. of units

Total

Capacity

(MVA)

110 / 33 20 2 40

220 / 110 100 2 200

519 M K Hubli 110 BAILHONGAL BELAGAVI Bagalkot 110 / 11 10 2 20

110 / 33 20 1 20

Page 153: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 139

Details of Existing Transmission Lines

Table 20: Details of transmission lines in Karnataka as on March 31, 2017

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

400kV

1 KOLAR PGCIL 400 KOLAR HVDC 0.1 Quad moose 2524

2 SMHLY PGCIL 400 KOLAR PGCIL 400 108.0 Twin Moose 1262

3 KOLAR PGCIL 400 HOODY 400 65.0 Quad moose 2524

4 KOLAR PGCIL 400 HOODY 400 65.0 Quad moose 2524

5 TUMKUR (New Madhugiri)400 BIDADI PGCIL 400 160.0 Quad moose 2524

6 TUMKUR (New Madhugiri)400 BIDADI PGCIL 400 160.0 Quad moose 2524

7 Hiryur PGCIL 400 NELAMANGALA 400 138.0 Twin Moose 1262

8 Hiryur PGCIL 400 NELAMANGALA 400 138.0 Twin Moose 1262

9 GUTTUR 400 Hiryur PGCIL 400 110.0 Twin Moose 1262

10 BTPS 400 Hiryur PGCIL 400 135.0 Twin Moose 1262

11 Dhoni 400 GUTTUR 400 118.0 Twin Moose 1262

12 Kaiga 400 GUTTUR 400 168.9 Twin Moose 1262

13 Kaiga 400 GUTTUR 400 168.9 Twin Moose 1262

14 Narendra PGCIL 400 GUTTUR 400 155.8 Twin Moose 1262

15 Narendra PGCIL 400 GUTTUR 400 155.8 Twin Moose 1262

16 UPCL 400 Shanthigrama (Hasan) 400 182.0 Quad moose 2524

17 UPCL 400 Shanthigrama (Hasan) 400 182.0 Quad moose 2524

18 Pavagada PS 400 TUMKUR (New Madhugiri)400 80.0 Quad moose 2524

19 Basthipura (Mysure) 400 NELAMANGALA 400 132.9 Twin Moose 1262

20 Shanthigrama (Hasan) 400 NELAMANGALA 400 213.0 Twin Moose 1262

21 Basthipura (Mysure) 400 Shanthigrama (Hasan) 400 95.9 Twin Moose 1262

22 Basthipura (Mysure) 400 Shanthigrama (Hasan) 400 95.9 Twin Moose 1262

23 Kudgi New 400 TUMKUR (New Madhugiri)400 265.0 Quad moose 2524

24 Kudgi New 400 TUMKUR (New Madhugiri)400 265.0 Quad moose 2524

25 GUTTUR 400 Hiryur PGCIL 400 110.0 Twin Moose 1262

26 Raichur New 400 RTPS 400 51.0 Quad moose 2524

27 NELAMANGALA 400 HOODY 400 80.0 Twin Moose 1262

Page 154: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

140 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

28 NELAMANGALA 400 HOODY 400 80.0 Twin Moose 1262

29 BIDADI PGCIL 400 SMHLY PGCIL 400 17.0 Twin Moose 1262

30 BIDADI PGCIL 400 SMHLY PGCIL 400 17.0 Twin Moose 1262

31 NELAMANGALA 400 BIDADI PGCIL 400 20.0 Twin Moose 1262

32 NELAMANGALA 400 BIDADI PGCIL 400 20.0 Twin Moose 1262

33 Basthipura (Mysure) 400 NELAMANGALA 400 132.9 Twin Moose 1262

34 Raichur New 400 RTPS 400 51.0 Quad moose 2524

35 Narendra PGCIL 400 Kaiga 400 100.0 Twin Moose 1262

36 Narendra PGCIL 400 Kaiga 400 100.0 Twin Moose 1262

37 Pavagada PS 400 TUMKUR (New Madhugiri)400 80.0 Quad moose 2524

38 Yermarus TPS 400 BTPS Pool 400 142.5 Quad moose 2524

39 Yermarus TPS 400 BTPS Pool 400 142.5 Quad moose 2524

40 BTPS 400 JSW 400 12.0 Twin Moose 1262

41 JSW 400 GUTTUR 400 141.0 Twin Moose 1262

42 BTPS 400 Hiryur PGCIL 400 135.0 Twin Moose 1262

43 Guddadahalli 400 RTPS 400 172.5 Twin Moose 1262

44 RTPS 400 BTPS 400 220.0 Twin Moose 1262

45 KOLAR PGCIL 400 KOLAR HVDC 0.1 Quad moose 2524

46 Kudgi New 400 Narendra PGCIL 400 110.0 Quad moose 2524

47 Kudgi New 400 Narendra PGCIL 400 110.0 Quad moose 2524

48 Kudgi New 400 Kudgi 400 7.0 Quad moose 2524

49 Kudgi New 400 Kudgi 400 7.0 Quad moose 2524

50 Kudgi New 400 Kudgi 400 7.0 Quad moose 2524

51 Kudgi New 400 Kudgi 400 7.0 Quad moose 2524

52 Guddadahalli 400 Dhoni 400 56.0 Twin Moose 1262

53 Shanthigrama (Hasan) 400 TALAGUPPA 400 284.0 Twin Moose 1262

54 TALAGUPPA 400 NELAMANGALA 400 350.0 Twin Moose 1262

55 BTPS Pool 400 BTPS 400 4.0 Twin Moose 1262

56 BTPS Pool 400 BTPS 400 4.0 Twin Moose 1262

57 BTPS Pool 400 JSW 400 10.0 Twin Moose 1262

58 BTPS Pool 400 JSW 400 10.0 Twin Moose 1262

Page 155: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 141

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

59 Pavagada PS 400 TUMKUR (New Madhugiri)400 80.0 Quad moose 2524

60 Pavagada PS 400 TUMKUR (New Madhugiri)400 80.0 Quad moose 2524

61 Hiryur PGCIL 400 Pavagada PS 400 85.0 Quad moose 2524

62 Hiryur PGCIL 400 Pavagada PS 400 85.0 Quad moose 2524

63 BTPS Pool 400 Pavagada PS 400 150.0 Quad moose 2524

64 BTPS Pool 400 Pavagada PS 400 150.0 Quad moose 2524

220kV

65 Alamatti 220 B Bagewadi 220 32 Drake 710

66 Alamatti 220 BAGALKOT 220 46.03 Drake 710

67 Alamatti 220 B Bagewadi 220 32 Drake 710

68 Alamatti 220 BAGALKOT 220 46.03 Drake 710

69 GM NAVARA 220 B Bagewadi 220 20.97 Drake 710

70 LINGASUGUR 220 B Bagewadi 220 95 Drake 710

71 Bijapur 220 GM NAVARA 220 17.97 Drake 710

72 GM NAVARA 220 B Bagewadi 220 20.97 Drake 710

73 LINGASUGUR 220 B Bagewadi 220 95 Drake 710

74 Hebbal Tap-1 Yelahanka 220 8 Drake 710

75 Bijapur 220 INDI 220 53 Drake 710

76 Chintamani 220 KOLAR PGCIL 220 30.9 Drake 710

77 Chintamani 220 KOLAR PGCIL 220 30.9 Drake 710

78 KOLAR KP 220 KOLAR PGCIL 220 11 Drake 710

79 KOLAR KP 220 KOLAR PGCIL 220 11 Drake 710

80 MALUR 220 KOLAR KP 220 30 Drake 710

81 MALUR 220 KOLAR KP 220 30 Drake 710

82 Sarjapura 220 MALUR 220 36 Drake 710

83 SMHLY 220 NGN PURA 220 23 Drake 710

84 SMHLY 220 HSR LT 220 23.5 Drake 710

85 SMHLY PGCIL 220 SMHLY 220 0.5 Quad moose 2524

86 SMHLY PGCIL 220 SMHLY 220 0.5 Quad moose 2524

87 HSR LT 220 NGN PURA 220 5 Drake 710

88 ITPL 220 HOODY 220 6.9 Drake 710

Page 156: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

142 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

89 SMHLY 220 HAROHALLI 220 17 Drake 710

90 HAROHALLI 220 Kanakapura 220 16 Drake 710

91 PEENYA 220 Hebbal Tap-1 7 Drake 710

92 HSR LT 220 HOODY 220 21.5 Drake 710

93 SMHLY 220 TATAGUNI 220 8 Drake 710

94 Khodyas 220 SBMPURA 220 23 Drake 710

95 RTPS 220 Raichur 220 20 Drake 710

96 SMHLY 220 YRND HALLI 220 50 Drake 710

97 Bus_WI_B Bagewadi 220 B Bagewadi 220 10 Drake 710

98 Bus_WI_Belgaum 220 Belgaum 220 5.3 Drake 710

99 Bidnal 220 Bus_WI_Bidnal 220 26 Drake 710

100 Bidnal 220 Bus_WI_Bidnal 220 26 Drake 710

101 Bus_WI_Guttur 220 GUTTUR 220 60 Drake 710

102 DB PURA Tap-1 KIADB DB Pura 220 0.5 Drake 710

103 DB PURA Tap-1 GOWRIBIDANUR 220 35 Drake 710

104 Vajramatti 220 BAGALKOT 220 30 Drake 710

105 Vajramatti 220 BAGALKOT 220 30 Drake 710

106 BMM ISPAT 220 Ittagi 220 40.3 Drake 710

107 Lingapur 220 BMM ISPAT 220 18.97 Drake 710

108 GUTTUR 220 Davanagere 220 40 Drake 710

109 GUTTUR 220 Davanagere 220 20 Drake 710

110 GUTTUR 220 Davanagere 220 22 Drake 710

111 Lingapur 220 Lingapur Tap-1 18 Drake 710

112 Shimoga 220 Davanagere 220 105 Drake 710

113 GUTTUR 220 Neelagunda 220 43 Drake 710

114 Ittagi 220 Neelagunda 220 37 Drake 710

115 Ranebennur 220 GUTTUR 220 40 Drake 710

116 Haveri 220 GUTTUR 220 70 Drake 710

117 Haveri 220 GUTTUR 220 70 Drake 710

118 GUTTUR 220 Chitradurga 220 85 Drake 710

119 Davanagere 220 Honnali 220 45 Drake 710

Page 157: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 143

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

120 Shimoga 220 Honnali 220 50 Drake 710

121 BIDADI PGCIL 220 Bidadi 220 3.4 1000 Sq.mm XLPE

UG cable 820

122 BIDADI PGCIL 220 Bidadi 220 3.4 1000 Sq.mm XLPE

UG cable 820

123 DB PURA 220 DB PURA Tap-1 7.3 Drake 710

124 Bidadi 220 SMHLY 220 40 Drake 710

125 Bidadi 220 SMHLY 220 40 Drake 710

126 ITPL 220 EPIP 220 10 Drake 710

127 Hiryur 220 Hiryur PGCIL 220 14.2 Drake 710

128 Bus_WI_Guttur 220 GUTTUR 220 60 Drake 710

129 Lingapur 220 MUNIRABAD PH 220 1.5 Drake 710

130 BIAL Begur 220 HOSKOTE 220 19.1 Drake 710

131 Hiryur PGCIL 220 GOWRIBIDANUR 220 121 Drake 710

132 HSR LT 220 NIMHANS 220 10 Lynx 385

133 NELAMANGALA 220 Magadi 220 40 Drake 710

134 Hiryur PGCIL 220 GOWRIBIDANUR 220 121 Drake 710

135 Hiryur PGCIL 220 Thallak 220 77 Drake 710

136 Yelahanka 220 HOODY 220 42 Drake 710

137 Hiryur 220 Madhugiri 220 78 Drake 710

138 NELAMANGALA 220 PEENYA 220 15 Drake 710

139 NELAMANGALA 220 PEENYA 220 15 Drake 710

140 NELAMANGALA 220 PEENYA 220 15 Drake 710

141 Hebbal Tap-1 CPRI 220 0.8 Drake 710

142 NELAMANGALA 220 DB PURA 220 35.9 Drake 710

143 NELAMANGALA 220 DB PURA 220 35.9 Drake 710

144 Shimoga 220 ANSN HALLY 220 200 Drake 710

145 DB PURA 220 BIAL Begur 220 24 Drake 710

146 HEBBAL 220 HOODY 220 24.4 Drake 710

147 Madhugiri 220 GOWRIBIDANUR 220 33 Drake 710

148 NRS 220 A STN 220 3.5 1000 Sq.mm XLPE

UG cable 820

Page 158: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

144 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

149 VRB VATHI 220 TATAGUNI 220 18.25 Drake 710

150 A STN 220 EDC 220 12 1000 Sq.mm XLPE

UG cable 820

151 PEENYA 220 NRS 220 7 Drake 710

152 EDC 220 HAL 220 20 Drake 710

153 HAL 220 HOODY 220 10 1000 Sq.mm XLPE

UG cable 820

154 HAL 220 HOODY 220 10 1000 Sq.mm XLPE

UG cable 820

155 HOODY 220 W FIELD 220 4 Drake 710

156 NELAMANGALA 220 DOBSPET 220 27 Drake 710

157 DOBSPET 220 KADUR 220 155 Drake 710

158 VARAHI 220 KEMAR 220 79 Drake 710

159 VARAHI 220 KEMAR 220 79 Drake 710

160 VARAHI 220 KEMAR 220 76.8 Moose 631

161 UPCL 220 KEMAR 220 23.1 Moose 631

162 UPCL 220 KEMAR 220 23.1 Moose 631

163 MSEZ 220 KEMAR 220 39 Drake 710

164 MSEZ 220 KEMAR 220 39 Drake 710

165 KEMAR 220 NETLAMADNUR 220 73 Drake 710

166 KEMAR 220 NETLAMADNUR 220 73 Drake 710

167 Kudgi 220 GM NAVARA 220 18.25 Drake 710

168 HASAN 220 NITTUR 220 115 Drake 710

169 Hadavahalli (GOPALPUR)220 Basthipura 220 85 Drake 710

170 Hootagalli 220 Basthipura 220 7.26 Drake 710

171 Hootagalli 220 Basthipura 220 7.26 Drake 710

172 SMHLY 220 Khodyas 220 10 Twin Moose 1262

173 Ancheplaya 220 Magadi 220 45 Drake 710

174 Shantigrama 220 Shimoga 220 143.4 Drake 710

175 CHIKAMAGALUR 220 Shimoga 220 109 Drake 710

176 CHIKAMAGALUR 220 Shantigrama 220 81 Drake 710

177 C R NAGARA 220 Kadakola 220 44.8 Drake 710

Page 159: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 145

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

178 C R NAGARA 220 Kadakola 220 44.8 Drake 710

179 C R NAGARA 220 MADHUVANAHALLY 220 41.5 Drake 710

180 C R NAGARA 220 MADHUVANAHALLY 220 41.5 Drake 710

181 Guddadahalli 220 Lingapur 220 9 Drake 710

182 Guddadahalli 220 Lingapur 220 9 Drake 710

183 MADHUVANAHALLY 220 T K Halli 220 25 Drake 710

184 Hadavahalli (GOPALPUR)220 Shantigrama 220 34.1 Drake 710

185 Basthipura 220 Kadakola 220 27.21 Drake 710

186 Basthipura 220 Kadakola 220 27.21 Drake 710

187 Kadakola 220 Hootagalli 220 28 Drake 710

188 VAJAMANGALA 220 Hootagalli 220 19.3 Drake 710

189 Guddadahalli 220 GUDDADAHALLI Tap-1 2.5 Drake 710

190 VAJAMANGALA 220 T K Halli 220 57.1 Drake 710

191 C R PATNA 220 K R PET 220 46.8 Drake 710

192 K R PET 220 TUBINAKERE 220 58.2 Drake 710

193 TUBINAKERE 220 Basthipura 220 39.6 Drake 710

194 KUSHALNAGARA 220 Basthipura 220 75.3 Drake 710

195 KUSHALNAGARA 220 Basthipura 220 75.3 Drake 710

196 Athani 220 Kudachi 220 39.15 Drake 710

197 GUDDADAHALLI Tap-1 GUDDADAHALLI Tap-2 3.5 Drake 710

198 Athani 220 Mahalingapura 220 60 Drake 710

199 ULTRA TECH 220 GUDDADAHALLI Tap-1 1.5 Drake 710

200 Kudachi 220 Mahalingapura 220 35 Drake 710

201 GUDDADAHALLI Tap-2 PRAXIER 220 0.5 Drake 710

202 Narendra2 220 Kanabargi Swt Stn 220 63 Drake 710

203 GUDDADAHALLI Tap-2 KALYAN STEELS 220 0.1 Drake 710

204 Narendra2 220 Kanabargi Swt Stn 220 63 Drake 710

205 MUKUNDA STEELS 220 KALYAN STEELS 220 0.5 Drake 710

206 Mahalingapura 220 Narendra PGCIL 220 123.41 Drake 710

207 Lingapur 220 Kustagi 220 77.5 Drake 710

208 Ghataprabha 220 Narendra PGCIL 220 96.5 Drake 710

Page 160: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

146 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

209 Ghataprabha 220 Narendra PGCIL 220 96.5 Drake 710

210 MK Hubli 220 Narendra PGCIL 220 34.53 Drake 710

211 MK Hubli 220 Narendra PGCIL 220 34.53 Drake 710

212 Mahalingapura 220 Narendra PGCIL 220 123.41 Drake 710

213 Chikkodi 220 Belgaum 220 75 Drake 710

214 Chikkodi 220 Belgaum 220 75 Drake 710

215 NELAMANGALA 220 ANSN HALLY 220 50 Drake 710

216 NELAMANGALA 220 Ancheplaya 220 36.7 Drake 710

217 SHARAVATHI 220 Shimoga 220 112 Drake 710

218 SHARAVATHI 220 Shimoga 220 112 Drake 710

219 SHARAVATHI 220 BALLIGAVI 220 65 Drake 710

220 SIRSI 220 SHARAVATHI 220 54 Drake 710

221 LINGASUGUR 220 Kustagi 220 73 Drake 710

222 SIRSI 220 SHARAVATHI 220 54 Drake 710

223 TALAGUPPA 220 SHARAVATHI 220 33 Drake 710

224 TALAGUPPA 220 SHARAVATHI 220 33 Drake 710

225 Shimoga 220 ARASIKERE 220 110 Drake 710

226 NELAMANGALA 220 NITTUR 220 75 Drake 710

227 Shimoga 220 KADUR 220 68 Drake 710

228 Shimoga 220 KIBBANAHALLI 220 140 Drake 710

229 NELAMANGALA 220 KIBBANAHALLI 220 110 Drake 710

230 Shimoga 220 VARAHI 220 86 Drake 710

231 Shimoga 220 VARAHI 220 86 Drake 710

232 Shimoga 220 VARAHI 220 86 1000 Sq.mm XLPE

UG cable 820

233 STRP 220 (Gerusoppa) TALAGUPPA 220 30 Drake 710

234 NELAMANGALA 220 Hebbal Tap-1 17 Drake 710

235 Kodasalli 220 Kadra 220 28.2 Drake 710

236 Mughalkhod 220 Ghataprabha 220 23 Drake 710

237 Kadra 220 Karwar 220 27.5 Drake 710

238 Kadra 220 Karwar 220 27.5 Drake 710

Page 161: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 147

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

239 Bidnal 220 Enercon (Harthi) 220 55 Drake 710

240 Bidnal 220 Enercon (Harthi) 220 55 Drake 710

241 Enercon (Harthi) 220 Gadag 220 7.3 Drake 710

242 Lingapur 220 MUNIRABAD PH 220 1.5 Drake 710

243 Bidnal 220 Saundatti 220 54.13 Drake 710

244 Bidnal 220 Nagajari 220 67.6 Drake 710

245 Kudgi 220 GM NAVARA 220 18.25 Drake 710

246 Nagajari 220 Ambewadi 220 30 Drake 710

247 Nagajari 220 Ambewadi 220 30 Drake 710

248 Narendra2 220 Ambewadi 220 54.5 Moose 631

249 Narendra2 220 Ambewadi 220 54.5 Moose 631

250 Kothipura 220 TUBINAKERE 220 18.17 Drake 710

251 Kothipura 220 TUBINAKERE 220 18.17 Drake 710

252 Kaiga 220 Kodasalli 220 15.24 Drake 710

253 TUMKUR (New Madhugiri)220 ANSN HALLY 220 18.5 Drake 710

254 Kothipura 220 Bidadi 220 68.82 Drake 710

255 SRS Hubli 220 Nagajari 220 65 Drake 710

256 SRS Hubli 220 Nagajari 220 65 Drake 710

257 SRS Hubli 220 Bidnal 220 5.3 Drake 710

258 SRS Hubli 220 Narendra2 220 38 Drake 710

259 SRS Hubli 220 Narendra2 220 38 Drake 710

260 SRS Hubli 220 SIRSI 220 137 Drake 710

261 SRS Hubli 220 SIRSI 220 137 Drake 710

262 TUMKUR (New Madhugiri)220 ANSN HALLY 220 18.5 Drake 710

263 Kothipura 220 Bidadi 220 68.82 Drake 710

264 TUMKUR (New Madhugiri)220 Madhugiri 220 44.5 Drake 710

265 MITTERMARI 220 GOWRIBIDANUR 220 45 Drake 710

266 MITTERMARI 220 GOWRIBIDANUR 220 45 Drake 710

267 Dhoni 220 Gadag 220 20.22 Drake 710

268 Narendra2 220 Haveri 220 90 Lynx 385

269 Narendra2 220 Haveri 220 90 Lynx 385

Page 162: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

148 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

270 Narendra PGCIL 220 Narendra2 220 0.1 Drake 710

271 Narendra PGCIL 220 Narendra2 220 0.1 Drake 710

272 Vajramatti 220 Mahalingapura 220 40 Drake 710

273 Vajramatti 220 Mahalingapura 220 40 Drake 710

274 JSW 220 Lingapur 220 35 Drake 710

275 JSW 220 Lingapur 220 35 Drake 710

276 BTPS 220 Lingapur 220 61 Drake 710

277 ALIPURA 220 BTPS 220 22 Drake 710

278 SINDHANUR 220 Lingapur 220 103 Drake 710

279 SINDHANUR 220 LINGASUGUR 220 91 Drake 710

280 LINGASUGUR 220 Mallat Tap_1 220 39.6 Drake 710

281 RTPS 220 Raichur 220 20 Drake 710

282 LINGASUGUR 220 RTPS 220 96 Drake 710

283 LINGASUGUR 220 RTPS 220 96 Drake 710

284 Mallat Tap_1 220 RTPS 220 46 Drake 710

285 Shahapur 220 RTPS 220 68.04 Drake 710

286 Shahapur 220 RTPS 220 68.04 Drake 710

287 Shahapur 220 LINGASUGUR 220 73.71 Drake 710

288 Mallat Tap_1 220 Mallat 220 2.14 Drake 710

289 Sedam 220 RTPS 220 105 Drake 710

290 Sedam 220 Shahapur 220 114.85 Drake 710

291 Sedam 220 RTPS 220 105 Drake 710

292 SHAHABAD 220 Shahapur 220 67.56 Drake 710

293 Humnabad 220 Sedam 220 85 Drake 710

294 Humnabad 220 Sedam 220 85 Drake 710

295 Bidadi 220 Toyota 220 0.3 Drake 710

296 HALABARGA 220 Humnabad 220 30 Drake 710

297 HALABARGA 220 Humnabad 220 30 Drake 710

298 Ittagi 220 Harkanal (Vestas) 220 34 Drake 710

299 Pavagada 220 Madhugiri 220 60 Drake 710

300 Shantigrama 220 C R PATNA 220 43.2 Drake 710

Page 163: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 149

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

301 TUMKUR (New Madhugiri)220 Madhugiri 220 44.5 Drake 710

302 Lingapur 220 Dhoni 220 79.77 Drake 710

303 KADAVINAKOTE (HNPURA) 220 Hadavahalli (GOPALPUR)220 8.9 Drake 710

304 KADAVINAKOTE (HNPURA) 220 Hadavahalli (GOPALPUR)220 8.9 Drake 710

305 Lingapur Tap-1 Dhoni 220 77.77 Drake 710

306 MSEZ 220 KAVOOR 220 9 Drake 710

307 MSEZ 220 KAVOOR 220 9 Drake 710

308 Thallak 220 Chitradurga 220 62 Drake 710

309 Honnali 220 Honnali Suzlon 19.81 Drake 710

310 Honnali 220 Honnali Suzlon 19.81 Drake 710

311 Guttur Vishwind 220 GUTTUR 220 5 Drake 710

312 Guttur Vishwind 220 GUTTUR 220 5 Drake 710

313 TALAGUPPA 220 SHARAVATHI 220 33 Drake 710

314 SRS Hubli 220 Nagajari 220 65 Drake 710

315 SRS Hubli 220 Bidnal 220 5.3 Drake 710

316 SMHLY 220 Jigani 220 45 Drake 710

317 Jigani 220 YRND HALLI 220 10 Drake 710

318 HASAN 220 ARASIKERE 220 50 Drake 710

319 B Bagewadi 220 IPP FF Greenko 220 2 Drake 710

320 Mughalkhod 220 Chikkodi 220 20 Drake 710

321 BAGALKOT 220 Gadag 220 110 Drake 710

322 Enercon (Harthi) 220 Gadag 220 7.3 Drake 710

323 Dhoni 220 Gadag 220 22.77 Drake 710

324 Kudachi 220 Ghataprabha 220 110 Drake 710

325 Humnabad 220 Kapanoor 220 65 Drake 710

326 BAGALKOT 220 Gadag 220 110 Drake 710

327 Humnabad 220 Kapanoor 220 65 Drake 710

328 GOWRIBIDANUR 220 RVM 220 5 Drake 710

329 Bijapur 220 GM NAVARA 220 17.97 Drake 710

330 GM NAVARA 220 Kudgi 220 18.25 Drake 710

331 GM NAVARA 220 Kudgi 220 18.25 Drake 710

Page 164: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

150 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

332 Pavagada 220 Madhugiri 220 60 Drake 710

333 Magadi 220 Bidadi 220 32 1000 Sq.mm XLPE

UG cable 820

334 Magadi 220 Bidadi 220 32 1000 Sq.mm XLPE

UG cable 820

110kV

335 Athani_2 110 Athani 110 3.7 Lynx 385

336 Yallammanawadi 110 Aigali 110 12 Lynx 385

337 Savalgi 110 Yallammanawadi 110 12 Lynx 385

338 Todalbagi 110 Savalgi 110 12.1 Lynx 385

339 Mamadapura 110 Todalbagi 110 20.1 Lynx 385

340 Mamadapura 110 Babaleshwar 110 13.46 Lynx 385

341 Shirabur Tap-1 Mamadapura 110 5 Lynx 385

342 Shirbur 110 Nandi Sugars 110 2.17 Lynx 385

343 B Bagewadi 110 Mamadapura 110 50 Lynx 385

344 Mamadapura Tap-1 Mamadapura 110 20 Lynx 385

345 Bhutnal 110 Bijapuri E 110 8 Lynx 385

346 B Bagewadi 110 Mamadapura Tap-1 30 Lynx 385

347 Malaghan 110 Mamadapura Tap-1 5 Lynx 385

348 Mathihal 110 Malaghan 110 8 Lynx 385

349 Tolmatti Tap-1 Shiraguppi V 110 8.5 Lynx 385

350 Bisnal Tap-1 Bilagi 110 5 Lynx 385

351 Rabkavi 110 Mahalingapura 110 20.7 Lynx 385

352 Athani 110 Satti 110 14.5 Lynx 385

353 Banahatti 110 Mahalingapura 110 9.5 Lynx 385

354 Banahatti 110 Jamakhandi 110 22.5 Lynx 385

355 Jamakhandi Tap-1 Jamakhandi 110 8 Lynx 385

356 Prabhulingeshwar Sugr 110 Jamakhandi Tap-1 1.2 Lynx 385

357 Shirol 110 Jamakhandi Tap-1 7.27 Lynx 385

358 Mareguddi 110 Manthur 110 15.9 Lynx 385

359 Mundaganur 110 Mareguddi 110 16.41 Lynx 385

Page 165: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 151

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

360 Sigikere 110 Bagalkot2 110 9.64 Lynx 385

361 Rampur 110 Sadashiv Sugars 110 4.21 Lynx 385

362 Nidagundi 110 Rampur 110 11.33 Lynx 385

363 Mukarthihal 110 Nidagundi 110 14.88 Lynx 385

364 B Bagewadi 110 Mukarthihal 110 14.04 Lynx 385

365 Toravi 110 Bhutnal 110 10 Lynx 385

366 Achanur 110 Bagalkot Tap-3 11.79 Lynx 385

367 Bagalkot Tap-4 Bagalkot Tap-3 7.92 Lynx 385

368 Bagalkot Tap-4 Muddebihal 110 21.9 Lynx 385

369 Tekkalaki 110 Toravi 110 10 Lynx 385

370 B Bagewadi 110 Bagalkot Tap-4 27.1 Lynx 385

371 Kudal Sangam 110 Bagalkot Tap-3 21.19 Lynx 385

372 Hungund 110 Kudal Sangam 110 23.63 Lynx 385

373 Kustagi 110 Ilkal 110 35 Lynx 385

374 Kustagi 110 Ilkal 110 35 Lynx 385

375 DEODURGA Tap-1 GABBUR 110 28 Coyote 323

376 Bijapuri E 110 Bijapur 110 2.04 Lynx 385

377 Bijapuri E 110 Bijapur 110 2.04 Lynx 385

378 Bijapur 110 Bijapur City 110 10 Lynx 385

379 Tikota 110 Tekkalaki 110 10 Lynx 385

380 Gajanur 110 Muthinakoppa 110 20 Dog 311

381 INDI 110 INDI_2 110 3 Lynx 385

382 B Bagewadi 110 Indi Tap-2 24 Wolf 405

383 Atharga 110 Indi Tap-1 10.75 Lynx 385

384 INDI_2 110 Indi Tap-1 15 Lynx 385

385 INDI 110 INDI_2 110 3 Lynx 385

386 INDI 110 Hirebevanur 110 16.24 Lynx 385

387 INDI 110 Lachayan 110 13.15 Lynx 385

388 INDI 110 Zhalki 110 21 Lynx 385

389 Zhalki 110 Chadchan 110 16 Lynx 385

390 Chadchan 110 Indian Sugars 110 4.3 Lynx 385

Page 166: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

152 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

391 D Hippargi 110 Indi Tap-3 21 Wolf 405

392 Indi Tap-3 Sindagi 110 1.4 Lynx 385

393 Indi Tap-2 D Hippargi 110 2 Lynx 385

394 Sindagi 110 Chandakavate 110 21.3 Lynx 385

395 Malghana (Sindagi Tq) 110 Indi Tap-3 8 Wolf 405

396 Indi Tap-4 Mortagi 110 0.5 Lynx 385

397 HALABARGA 110 BIDAR (KOLHAR) 110 7.64 Lynx 385

398 HALABARGA 110 KAMATHANA 110 22 Lynx 385

399 Indi Tap-4 Mandewali 110 16 Lynx 385

400 Hosur 110 Kittadahalli Tap-1 10 Lynx 385

401 Kittadahalli Tap-1 Kittadahalli 110 3 Lynx 385

402 Malghana (Sindagi Tq) 110 Manali Sugars 110 1 Wolf 405

403 Sanda 110 Balligavi Tap1 15 Lynx 385

404 GURMATKAL 110 Bus_WI_Gurmitkal 110 3 Lynx 385

405 Vajramatti 110 Vajramatti2 110 1.8 Lynx 385

406 Vajramatti 110 Vajramatti2 110 1.8 Lynx 385

407 Lokapur 110 Salahalli 110 16.77 Lynx 385

408 Uttur 110 ICPL 110 4.32 Lynx 385

409 Badami 110 Kerur 110 23.5 Lynx 385

410 GMR Sugars 110 Ramdurga 110 1 Lynx 385

411 Bagalkot Tap-1 Ramdurga 110 34 Lynx 385

412 Shimoga 110 MYSORE PAPER MILL 110 8 Wolf 405

413 MOKA Tap-1 BELLARY Tap-1 5.1 Lynx 385

414 MOKA 110 MOKA Tap-1 8.5 Lynx 385

415 MOKA Tap-1 PD Halli Tap-1 2.4 Lynx 385

416 GABBUR 110 Raichur 110 23 Coyote 323

417 KIRLOSKAR- Tap 1 MUNIRABAD PH 110 8 Lynx 385

418 KIRLOSKAR- Tap 1 KIRLOSKAR 110 4 Lynx 385

419 HAREKRISHNA 110 KIRLOSKAR- Tap 1 3.92 Lynx 385

420 Somalapur 110 NITTUR 110 6.53 Lynx 385

421 NONAVINAKERE 110 Tandaga 110 8 Lynx 385

Page 167: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 153

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

422 Tandaga 110 Gungurmele 110 8 Lynx 385

423 C N Hally Tap1 Katrikehal 110 10 Lynx 385

424 Tiptur Tap-2 Keregodi 110 9 Lynx 385

425 MAYASANDRA 110 Talakere 110 4.43 Lynx 385

426 KOPPAL Tap-1 HAREKRISHNA 110 1.06 Lynx 385

427 Narendra2 110 Kud Dharwad 110 9.6 Drake 710

428 C N Hally Tap2 Huliyar 110 8 Lynx 385

429 C N Hally Tap2 Hadanakere 110 12.22 Lynx 385

430 Thimmanahalli 110 C N Hally Tap2 11.73 Lynx 385

431 C N Hally Tap1 Thimmanahalli 110 17.73 Lynx 385

432 C N Hally 110 C N Hally Tap1 4 Lynx 385

433 C N Hally Tap1 Settikere 110 6.52 Lynx 385

434 KIBBANAHALLI Tap3 KADEHALLI 110 11.7 Lynx 385

435 KIBBANAHALLI Tap3 MAYASANDRA 110 11.09 Lynx 385

436 KIBBANAHALLI Tap2 KIBBANAHALLI Tap3 2 Lynx 385

437 KIBBANAHALLI Tap2 TURUVEKERE 110 2 Lynx 385

438 KIBBANAHALLI Tap1 KIBBANAHALLI Tap2 4 Lynx 385

439 KIBBANAHALLI 110 KIBBANAHALLI Tap1 16 Lynx 385

440 KIBBANAHALLI 110 C N Hally 110 15 Lynx 385

441 KIBBANAHALLI Tap1 NONAVINAKERE 110 2 Lynx 385

442 Tiptur Tap1 Halukurke 110 12.5 Lynx 385

443 Tiptur 110 Tiptur Tap1 2 Lynx 385

444 Bandihalli 110 Tiptur 110 4.5 Lynx 385

445 Doddaguni Tap1 Doddaguni Tap2 2.5 Lynx 385

446 Doddaguni Tap1 Sampige 110 11.56 Lynx 385

447 Doddaguni Tap2 Ammasandra 110 6 Lynx 385

448 Tiptur Tap-2 Tiptur Tap1 5 Lynx 385

449 Bandihalli 110 KIBBANAHALLI 110 19 Lynx 385

450 Kammaradi 110 Hulikam Tap1(1) 4 Dog 311

451 Hulikam Tap1(1) Hulikal Tap1 8 Dog 311

452 Hulikal Tap1 Manidam 110 4.4 Dog 311

Page 168: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

154 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

453 Hulikal Tap1 Hulikal 110 0.07 Dog 311

454 Hosangadi 110 Hulikal 110 9 Dog 311

455 Halady 110 Hosangadi 110 17 Moose 415

456 Hiriyadaka 110 Madhuvana 110 15 Lynx 385

457 Madhuvana 110 Kundapura 110 13 Lynx 385

458 Kundapura 110 Navuda 110 32 Lynx 385

459 Hosangadi 110 Sandur Power 110 2.6 Lynx 385

460 Hosangadi 110 Sandur Power 110 2.6 Lynx 385

461 Muthinakoppa 110 Hulikam Tap2 34.8 Dog 311

462 Hulikam Tap2 Thirthalli 110 1 Moose 415

463 Hulikam Tap2 Hulikam Tap1(1) 8 Dog 311

464 Shimoga 110 Gajanur 110 12.8 Dog 311

465 KAVOOR 110 Bejai 110 5.85 Lynx 385

466 KAVOOR 110 AMR RITWK 110 23.1 Lynx 385

467 B C Road 110 Kanoje Tap1 26.52 Lynx 385

468 KAVOOR 110 Kulshekara 110 12.5 Dog 311

469 KAVOOR 110 Kulshekara 110 12.5 Dog 311

470 konaje 110 Kanoje Tap1 12 Lynx 385

471 SALETHUR 110 Kanoje Tap2 20 Lynx 385

472 Kanoje Tap1 SALETHUR 110 20 Lynx 385

473 Kanoje Tap2 Vitla 110 1.5 Lynx 385

474 NETLAMADNUR 110 Kanoje Tap2 10 Lynx 385

475 NETLAMADNUR 110 Puttur 110 4 Lynx 385

476 Puttur 110 Karaya 110 4 Lynx 385

477 Kavoor Tap1 KAVOOR 110 4.5 Lynx 385

478 Kavoor Tap2 Kavoor Tap1 1.3 Lynx 385

479 Kavoor Tap2 Baikampady 110 5.32 Lynx 385

480 MRPL 110 Kavoor Tap1 8.1 Lynx 385

481 Moodabidre 110 Gurupura 110 26.2 Lynx 385

482 KEMAR 110 Manipal 110 31 Lynx 385

483 Moodabidre 110 KEMAR 110 15 Moose 415

Page 169: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 155

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

484 KEMAR 110 Manipal 110 31 Lynx 385

485 Manipal 110 Manipal Nittur 110 8.4 Lynx 385

486 Manipal 110 Hiriyadaka 110 11.5 Lynx 385

487 KEMAR 110 Karkala 110 1.1 Moose 415

488 Manipal 110 Brahmavara 110 13.7 Lynx 385

489 Kadur Tap4 Kallusadarahalli 110 14.3 Lynx 385

490 Nandikur 110 KEMAR 110 22.6 Lynx 385

491 Guruvanakere 110 KEMAR 110 47.5 Lynx 385

492 Guruvanakere 110 KEMAR 110 47.5 Lynx 385

493 Kadur Tap3 Banavara 110 0.5 Lynx 385

494 Kadur Tap3 Jawagal 110 22 Lynx 385

495 Kadur Tap3 Kadur Tap4 2.4 Lynx 385

496 Kadur Tap5 Kadur Tap4 11 Lynx 385

497 Kadur Tap 6 Kadur Tap5 0.9 Lynx 385

498 Kadur Tap5 Gerumara 110 16 Lynx 385

499 Kadur Tap 6 Kandur Tap7 9 Lynx 385

500 Kadur Tap 6 ARASIKERE 110 0.1 Lynx 385

501 Honnavalli 110 D M Kurke 110 19.6 Lynx 385

502 Kandur Tap7 Honnavalli 110 11.6 Lynx 385

503 Kandur Tap7 Kadur Tap 8 19.8 Lynx 385

504 Kadur Tap 8 Gandasi 110 1.2 Lynx 385

505 Kadur Tap 8 Kondenalu 110 5.5 Lynx 385

506 Koppal 110 KOPPAL Tap-1 10 Lynx 385

507 KOPPAL Tap-1 GINIGERA 110 3 Lynx 385

508 Bus_CO_Girisagar 110 Giri sagar 110 5.65 Lynx 385

509 UAS Dharwad 110 Mruthyanjayanagar 110 6 Lynx 385

510 Athani_2 110 Renuka Sugars A 110 10.14 Lynx 385

511 UGAR Sugars 110 UGAR 110 1 Lynx 385

512 Athani 110 Tanvashi 110 20.35 Lynx 385

513 Nirani Sugars 110 Mahabalipura Tap-2 0.3 Lynx 385

514 Mahabalipura Tap-3 Mudhol 110 1 Lynx 385

Page 170: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

156 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

515 Mahabalipura Tap-1 Uttur 110 6.8 Lynx 385

516 Mahabalipura Tap-1 Rannabelagali 110 7 Wolf 405

517 Manthur 110 Mahabalipura Tap-3 5 Lynx 385

518 Vajramatti 110 Jambagi K D 110 8 Lynx 385

519 Manthur 110 Vajramatti 110 9.9 Lynx 385

520 Ainapur 110 Kudachi 110 9 Lynx 385

521 UGAR 110 Kudachi 110 10 Lynx 385

522 Kudachi_2 110 Kudachi 110 1.5 Lynx 385

523 Terdal 110 Mahalingapura 110 15 Lynx 385

524 Ainapur LIS 110 Ainapur 110 12 Lynx 385

525 Kud Dharwad 110 Lakammanahalli 110 5.42 Drake 710

526 Narendra2 110 Tadasan Koppa 110 14.8 Drake 710

527 Lakammanahalli 110 Navanagar_D 110 9.16 Drake 710

528 MK Hubli_2 110 Kittur 110 26.5 Lynx 385

529 Beluria 110 Narendra_2 Tap-1 3.25 Lynx 385

530 Beluria 110 Narendra2 110 6.15 Lynx 385

531 Narendra2 110 Mruthyanjayanagar 110 9.62 Lynx 385

532 Bevoor 110 Kustagi 110 24.6 Lynx 385

533 MK Hubli 110 MK Hubli_2 110 1.42 Lynx 385

534 MK Hubli 110 MK Hubli_2 110 1.42 Lynx 385

535 Khanapur MK 110 MK Hubli 110 24 Lynx 385

536 Hirebaagewadi 110 MK Hubli 110 13.2 Wolf 405

537 Bailhongal 110 MK Hubli 110 21.23 Lynx 385

538 Belgaum Tap-1 Uchagaon 110 15.12 Lynx 385

539 Belgaum Tap-1 Belgaum 110 0.3 Lynx 385

540 Uchagaon 110 Udayambagh 110 6.5 Lynx 385

541 Bus_WI_Saundatti 110 Saundatti 110 10.6 Lynx 385

542 Kanabargi Layout 110 Vadagaon 110 21 Lynx 385

543 Belgaum 110 Kanabargi Layout 110 5.5 Lynx 385

544 KUSHTAGI Tap-1 Kustagi 110 20.05 Lynx 385

545 GANADHAL 110 KUSHTAGI Tap-1 1.62 Lynx 385

Page 171: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 157

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

546 GDPH Hittargi Tap-1 4 Lynx 385

547 Ghataprabha_2 110 Hittargi Tap-1 17 Lynx 385

548 Hidakaldam 110 GDPH 2 Lynx 385

549 Ghataprabha 110 Ghataprabha_2 110 5.76 Lynx 385

550 Ghataprabha 110 Ghataprabha_2 110 5.76 Lynx 385

551 Chikkodi 110 Sankeshwar 110 32.78 Lynx 385

552 Sankeshwar 110 Heera Sugars 110 1 Lynx 385

553 Sankeshwar 110 Heera Sugars_1 110 0.3 Lynx 385

554 Hukkeri 110 Kotabagi LIS 110 9 Lynx 385

555 KANAKAGIRI 110 KUSHTAGI Tap-1 17.16 Lynx 385

556 Daddi 110 Belgaum Tap-1 20 Lynx 385

557 Ankalgi 110 Belgaum 110 30 Lynx 385

558 Hukkeri 110 Vishwanatha Sugars 110 15 Lynx 385

559 Sankeshwar 110 Hukkeri 110 14.73 Lynx 385

560 Ghataprabha 110 Shirgaon 110 14.11 Lynx 385

561 Ghataprabha 110 Kabbur 110 24.16 Lynx 385

562 Gokak 110 Ghataprabha 110 14.5 Lynx 385

563 Gokak 110 Mamdapura 110 12.38 Lynx 385

564 Mudalgi 110 Hunsihal 110 14.58 Lynx 385

565 Mudalgi Tap-1 Mudalgi 110 6 Lynx 385

566 Hunsihal 110 Satish Sugar 110 1.8 Lynx 385

567 Hunsihal 110 Ghataprabha 110 16.6 Lynx 385

568 Bus_WI_shiratti 110 Shirhatti 110 1 Lynx 385

569 Bus_CO_HALYAL 110 Halyal 110 0.9 Lynx 385

570 Mahalingapura 110 Davaleshwar 110 12 Lynx 385

571 Mudalgi Tap-1 Kuligod 110 13 Lynx 385

572 Kustagi 110 YELBURGA 110 28 Lynx 385

573 NITTUR 110 Bidre 110 6.53 Lynx 385

574 HANAMSAGAR 110 Kustagi 110 29.27 Lynx 385

575 HANAMSAGAR 110 HIREGONNAGAR 110 13.4 Lynx 385

576 Shikaripura 110 BALLIGAVI 110 23 Lynx 385

Page 172: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

158 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

577 Balligavi Tap1 Shrilkoppa 110 20.45 Lynx 385

578 Balligavi Tap1 Essur 110 7.5 Lynx 385

579 Shrilkoppa 110 BALLIGAVI 110 6 Lynx 385

580 Shikaripura 110 Balligavi Tap2 1.5 Lynx 385

581 Balligavi Tap2 Balligavi Tap1 2.5 Lynx 385

582 BPCL (CHAYADEVI PH) 110 Lingasugur 110 18 Lynx 385

583 Gubbi 110 NITTUR 110 15 Lynx 385

584 Hirekerur 110 Ranebennur 110 42 Lynx 385

585 Ranebennur 110 Tumminakatte 110 26 Lynx 385

586 Ranebennur Tap 1 Ranebennur 110 20 Lynx 385

587 Aremallapur 110 Ranebennur Tap 1 24 Lynx 385

588 Guttal Switching 110 Ranebennur Tap 1 11 Lynx 385

589 Guttal Switching 110 Ranebennur 110 31 Lynx 385

590 Guttal Switching 110 Guttal 110 3.8 Lynx 385

591 Guttal Switching 110 Guttal 110 3.8 Lynx 385

592 Hangal 110 Haveri 110 35 Lynx 385

593 Haveri 110 Haveri2 110 0.1 Lynx 385

594 Haveri 110 Tiluvalli 110 33 Lynx 385

595 Haveri 110 Bydagi 110 18 Lynx 385

596 Suzlon (Shindenur) 110 Bydagi 110 8.1 Lynx 385

597 Araga 110 Ankola 110 19.5 Lynx 385

598 Ankola 110 Kumta 110 31.87 Lynx 385

599 Kumta 110 Honnavara 110 25 Lynx 385

600 Honnavara 110 Murdeshwar 110 28 Lynx 385

601 Chandragutti 110 Sirsi Tap-1 4.5 Coyote 286

602 Sirsi Tap-1 Siddapura 110 6 Coyote 286

603 Bharanagi 110 Balligavi Tap3 8 Lynx 385

604 Anavatti 110 Bharanagi 110 12 Lynx 385

605 Yagati 110 Singatagere 110 17.5 Lynx 385

606 KADUR 110 Yagati 110 18.4 Lynx 385

607 KADUR 110 Tangali 110 7 Lynx 385

Page 173: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 159

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

608 Machenahalli 110 Bhadravathi 110 9 Lynx 385

609 Shimoga 110 VISL 110 15.3 Lynx 385

610 Shimoga 110 VISL 110 15.3 Lynx 385

611 VISL 110 Bhadravathi 110 1.5 Lynx 385

612 BPCL (CHAYADEVI PH) 110 Lingasugur 110 18 Lynx 385

613 Nagenahalli 110 Kadur Tap2 4 Lynx 385

614 Nidaghatta 110 Kadur Tap2 6 Lynx 385

615 Kadur Tap2 KADUR 110 21 Lynx 385

616 Shivani 110 Ajjamapura 110 14 Lynx 385

617 Kadur Tap1 Ajjamapura 110 4 Lynx 385

618 KADUR 110 Kadur Tap1 13.6 Lynx 385

619 Kadur Tap1 Hirenallur 110 5 Lynx 385

620 Birur 110 KADUR 110 5 Lynx 385

621 Birur 110 Shivapura 110 10 Lynx 385

622 Shivapura 110 Nerlakere 110 10 Lynx 385

623 Tarikere Tap1 Nerlakere 110 6.5 Lynx 385

624 Tarikere Tap1 Tarikere 110 0.5 Lynx 385

625 Soham Power Moodabidre 110 13.2 Lynx 385

626 Kavoor Tap3 Baikampady 110 5.2 Lynx 385

627 Kavoor Tap3 KISCO 110 0.05 Lynx 385

628 Shimoga Tap2 Shimoga 110 30 Drake 710

629 Kumshi 110 Shimoga Tap2 0.6 Drake 710

630 Anandapur 110 Ripponpet 110 10 Drake 710

631 Sorba 110 Sagar 110 28 Lynx 385

632 GURGUNTA 110 Lingasugur 110 17.5 Lynx 385

633 Talaguppa 110 Sagar 110 15 Lynx 385

634 Sagar 110 MGHE 110 26 Lynx 385

635 Sagar 110 MGHE 110 26 Lynx 385

636 Sagar 110 LDPH 110 28.5 Lynx 385

637 MUDUGAL 110 Lingasugur 110 19.8 Lynx 385

638 Talaguppa 110 LDPH 110 13 Lynx 385

Page 174: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

160 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

639 MGHE 110 LDPH 110 12 Lynx 385

640 LDPH 110 Jog 110 12 Lynx 385

641 MGHE 110 Jog 110 2 Lynx 385

642 Alkola 110 Shimoga Tap1 3.5 Drake 710

643 Shimoga Tap1 Mandli 110 0.5 Drake 710

644 Shimoga Tap1 Shimoga 110 3.5 Drake 710

645 Sagar 110 Anandapur 110 28 Drake 710

646 Sagar 110 Alkola 110 65 Drake 710

647 Togarsi 110 Balligavi Tap3 6 Lynx 385

648 Balligavi Tap3 BALLIGAVI 110 10 Lynx 385

649 Jog 110 Ambuthirtha 110 4 Lynx 385

650 Jog 110 Ambuthirtha 110 4 Lynx 385

651 Kavoor Tap2 MCF 110 0.4 Lynx 385

652 Kittadahalli Tap-1 BALLIGAVI 110 20 Lynx 385

653 Solaris 110 Karwar 110 7 Lynx 385

654 Karwar 110 Araga 110 8.3 Lynx 385

655 NITTUR 110 Doddaguni 110 36.2 Lynx 385

656 Doddaguni 110 Doddaguni Tap1 2 Lynx 385

657 NITTUR 110 Kadaba 110 11.14 Lynx 385

658 NITTUR 110 Nittur Tap1 10 Lynx 385

659 NITTUR 110 Kallur 110 34 Lynx 385

660 K G Temple 110 UNGRA 110 7.4 Lynx 385

661 Nittur Tap1 K G Temple 110 16.32 Lynx 385

662 Keregodi 110 Hunaseghatta 110 9 Lynx 385

663 SUZLON KALMANGI 110 SINDHANUR 110 28.6 Lynx 385

664 HATTI 110 Lingasugur 110 16 Lynx 385

665 MUNIRABAD PH 110 KEREHALLI Tap-1 5 Coyote 323

666 MUNIRABAD PH 110 JPH Tap-1 1 Lynx 385

667 Gajanur 110 Bus_MH_Gajanur 110 1.5 Lynx 385

668 Hiriyadaka 110 Bus_MH_Hiriyadka 33 3.6 Lynx 385

669 JPH Tap-1 JPH 110 0.5 Lynx 385

Page 175: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 161

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

670 JPH Tap-1 STAR Metalics Ltd 110 12 Lynx 385

671 Ambewadi Tap 2 Supa power house 110 40 Lynx 385

672 Supa power house 110 Ambewadi Tap 1 1.72 Lynx 385

673 Ambewadi Tap 1 Ambewadi 110 12 Lynx 385

674 Ambewadi Tap 1 GANESHGUDI 110 0.9 Lynx 385

675 Supa power house 110 Ambewadi 110 13.72 Lynx 385

676 Ambewadi 110 Halyal 110 27 Coyote 286

677 Ambewadi 110 Kavalwad 110 33.6 Coyote 286

678 Halyal 110 Kavalwad 110 22 Coyote 286

679 SRS Hubli 110 Kadanakoppa 110 17.07 Lynx 385

680 SRS Hubli 110 Kavalwad Tap 1 28.7 Lynx 385

681 Kavalwad 110 Kiravatti 110 17 Coyote 286

682 Kavalwad Tap 1 Kalaghatagi 110 4.65 Lynx 385

683 Kiravatti 110 Umachagi 110 29 Coyote 286

684 Umachagi 110 Sirsi Tap-1 26 Lynx 385

685 SRS Hubli 110 Anandnagar 110 3 Lynx 385

686 SRS Hubli 110 RAMANKOPPA 110 24.3 Lynx 385

687 Anandnagar 110 Aakshaya Colony 110 3.8 Lynx 385

688 SHATHAVAHANA IPP Kuditini 110 10 Lynx 385

689 SAVANUR 110 Haveri 110 30 Lynx 385

690 STAR Metalics Ltd 110 DONIMALALI 110 45 Lynx 385

691 MUNIRABAD PH 110 DONIMALALI 110 44 Lynx 385

692 MUNIRABAD PH 110 SANKALAPUR 110 17.5 Lynx 385

693 SRS Hubli 110 SRS Hubli Tap 1 3 Lynx 385

694 SRS Hubli 110 SRS Hubli Tap 1 3 Lynx 385

695 KAMALAPURA Tap-1 KAMALAPURA 110 5.8 Lynx 385

696 SRS Hubli Tap 1 Tarihal 110 15.8 Drake 710

697 Ambewadi Tap 2 Anmod 110 0.1 Lynx 385

698 Gadag Road 110 Bidnal 110 5.59 Lynx 385

699 PH Comp 110 SRS Hubli 110 5.19 Lynx 385

700 Navalgund 110 Bidnal 110 35.05 Lynx 385

Page 176: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

162 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

701 Nargund Tap-1 Navalgund 110 23 Lynx 385

702 BPCL (Nargund) 110 Nargund 110 1 Lynx 385

703 Nargund Tap-1 Nargund 110 2 Lynx 385

704 KEREHALLI Tap-1 BPCL M 110 7 Coyote 323

705 Konnur 110 Nargund Tap-1 26.1 Lynx 385

706 Laxmeshwar 110 Gadag 110 37 Lynx 385

707 Laxmeshwar 110 Shirhatti 110 21.96 Lynx 385

708 Laxmeshwar 110 Bellahatti 110 22.6 Lynx 385

709 Enercon (Bannikoppa) 110 Bellahatti 110 12.39 Lynx 385

710 Mundargi 110 VSPL 110 16.5 Lynx 385

711 Mundargi 110 Dambal Tap1 2 Lynx 385

712 Uppin Betagere 110 Dambal Tap1 17 Lynx 385

713 Enercon (Hirewaditti) 110 Dambal 110 9.34 Lynx 385

714 Dambal Tap1 Dambal 110 18.17 Lynx 385

715 Suzlon (Herogere) 110 Dambal 110 17 Lynx 385

716 SUZLON KALMANGI 110 SINDHANUR 110 28.6 Lynx 385

717 Dambal 110 Gadag 110 21.5 Lynx 385

718 Hirehal 110 Ron 110 9.38 Lynx 385

719 Ron 110 Naregal 110 18.5 Lynx 385

720 Naregal 110 Gadagbettigere 110 24.8 Lynx 385

721 Gadag2 110 Gadagbettigere 110 11.8 Lynx 385

722 BPCL M 110 MALLPURA 110 16.5 Coyote 323

723 Annigeri 110 Bidnal 110 39.14 Lynx 385

724 Gadag 110 Gadag2 110 0.5 Lynx 385

725 KEREHALLI Tap-1 KEREHALLI 110 3 Coyote 323

726 Gajendragad 110 Ron 110 24.9 Lynx 385

727 Dambal 110 Sambapur 110 18.95 Lynx 385

728 Shirhatti 110 Gadag 110 32 Lynx 385

729 Sambapur 110 Gadag 110 8.73 Lynx 385

730 Suzlon (Bagewadi) 110 Guttal Switching 110 37.62 Lynx 385

731 Suzlon (Bagewadi) 110 Guttal Switching 110 37.62 Lynx 385

Page 177: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 163

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

732 Belgaum 110 Nehru nagar 110 14.3 Lynx 385

733 RAIBAGH 110 Chikkodi 110 18 Lynx 385

734 RAIBAGH 110 Chikkodi 110 18 Lynx 385

735 Kabbur 110 Gamesha 2.5 Lynx 385

736 Saidapur M 110 Davaleshwar 110 3.3 Lynx 385

737 Nippani 110 Khadakalat 110 15 Lynx 385

738 Ankali 110 Chikkodi 110 18 Lynx 385

739 Chikkodi 110 CHIKKODI_2 110 7 Lynx 385

740 RSR 110 Bhoj 110 0.1 Lynx 385

741 Chikkodi 110 Nanadi 110 10 Lynx 385

742 Chikkodi 110 Sadalga Tap-1 7 Lynx 385

743 Chikkodi 110 Doodaganga krishna 110 7 Lynx 385

744 CHIKKODI_2 110 Doddannavar 110 1.5 Lynx 385

745 Sadalga 110 Boragaon 110 8.5 Lynx 385

746 Ankali 110 Shivashakti Sugars 110 6.5 Lynx 385

747 Sadalga Tap-1 Sadalga 110 7 Lynx 385

748 Chikkodi 110 Bhoj 110 16.72 Lynx 385

749 Sadalga 110 Venkateshwara Sugar 110 8.5 Lynx 385

750 Mahalingapura 110 GSML 110 8.3 Lynx 385

751 Mahalingapura 110 GSML 110 8.3 Lynx 385

752 Rannabelagali 110 Mahalingapura 110 8.5 Wolf 405

753 Manthur 110 Nirani Sugars 110 7.3 Lynx 385

754 Melligere 110 Vajramatti 110 8.32 Lynx 385

755 Vajramatti 110 Katharki 110 14.35 Lynx 385

756 Katharki 110 GEM Sugars 110 3.91 Lynx 385

757 Bagalkot2 110 BAGALKOT 110 10.75 Lynx 385

758 Bagalkot2 110 BAGALKOT 110 10.75 Lynx 385

759 Neerbudihal 110 K Sugars 110 4.2 Lynx 385

760 K Sugars 110 BAGALKOT 110 8.08 Lynx 385

761 BAGALKOT 110 Guledagudda 110 29.2 Lynx 385

762 BAGALKOT 110 Navanagar_B 110 6.18 Lynx 385

Page 178: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

164 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

763 BAGALKOT 110 Bagalkot Tap-1 17.5 Lynx 385

764 Saundatti 110 Saundatti2 110 1 Lynx 385

765 Saundatti 110 Saundatti2 110 1 Lynx 385

766 Saundatti 110 Udakeri 110 23.9 Lynx 385

767 Saundatti 110 Munavalli 110 20.12 Lynx 385

768 Saundatti 110 Saundatti Tap-1 16.12 Lynx 385

769 Saundatti Tap-1 Renuka Sugars 110 7.3 Lynx 385

770 Renuka Sugars 110 Yaragatti 110 14.6 Lynx 385

771 Yaragatti 110 Katkol 110 13.52 Lynx 385

772 Lokapur 110 BAGALKOT 110 28.4 Lynx 385

773 Kaladigi 110 BAGALKOT 110 19.53 Lynx 385

774 Kerur 110 Konnur 110 18.1 Lynx 385

775 Shiraguppi V 110 Vajramatti 110 20.15 Lynx 385

776 Mundagod Tap-1 Mundagod 110 10 Lynx 385

777 Kuditini 110 THORANAGAL 110 25 Lynx 385

778 ALIPURA Tap-1 SHATHAVAHANA IPP 2.1 Lynx 385

779 Allipura 110 Agarwal Tap-1 5 Lynx 385

780 ALIPURA Tap-1 KURUGODU 110 16 Lynx 385

781 KURUGODU 110 SUZLON KURGODU 110 11.9 Lynx 385

782 AC CEMENT Tap-1 Allipura 110 10 Lynx 385

783 AC CEMENT Tap-1 AC CEMENT 110 1.2 Lynx 385

784 AC CEMENT Tap-1 SOMASAMUDRA Tap-1 15 Lynx 385

785 SOMASAMUDRA 110 SOMASAMUDRA Tap-1 4.1 Lynx 385

786 BELLARY(N) 110 SOMASAMUDRA Tap-1 5 Lynx 385

787 BELLARY Tap-1 BELLARY(N) 110 3.6 Lynx 385

788 NKS Tap-1 BELLARY Tap-1 0.1 Lynx 385

789 NKS Tap-1 BSAL Tap-1 0.1 Lynx 385

790 BSAL Tap-1 ANANTHPUR ROAD Tap-1 0.1 Lynx 385

791 ANANTHPUR ROAD Tap-1 ANANTHPUR ROAD 110 3 Lynx 385

792 Mundagod Tap-1 Shiggaon 110 15 Lynx 385

793 BELLARY(S) 110 BELLARY(S) Tap-1 2 Lynx 385

Page 179: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 165

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

794 BELLARY(S) Tap-1 HOTHUR STEELS 110 6.5 Lynx 385

795 PD Halli Tap-1 PD Halli 110 3.35 Lynx 385

796 PD Halli 110 Janaki 110 7.01 Lynx 385

797 ROYAL SEEMA 110 PD Halli Tap-1 3.65 Lynx 385

798 VENKATAGIRI 110 MALLPURA 110 10.5 Lynx 385

799 VENKATAGIRI 110 GANGAVATHI 110 3 Coyote 323

800 KARATAGI Tap-1 SRIRAMNAGAR 110 18.2 Coyote 323

801 KARATAGI 110 KARATAGI Tap-1 0.5 Coyote 323

802 KARATAGI Tap-1 SINDHANUR 110 14 Coyote 323

803 KAMPLI 110 KAMPLI Tap-1 9 Coyote 323

804 KAMPLI Tap-1 KPH 110 9 Coyote 323

805 KPH 110 MUKUND Tap-1 36 Coyote 323

806 MUKUND Tap-1 MUKUND 110 12.62 Lynx 385

807 SINDHANUR 110 MUKUND Tap-1 4.3 Coyote 323

808 SINDHANUR 110 SINDHANUR2 110 8 Lynx 385

809 SINDHANUR 110 SINDHANUR2 110 10.7 Lynx 385

810 SINDHANUR 110 SINDHANUR2 110 12.56 Lynx 385

811 SINDHANUR 110 DADESUGUR 110 24.57 Lynx 385

812 DADESUGUR 110 SIRAGUPPA 110 11.9 Lynx 385

813 SIRAGUPPA 110 TEKKALKOTE 110 15.38 Lynx 385

814 SIRAGUPPA 110 NSL SUGARS S 110 8 Lynx 385

815 Kavital Tap-1 MASKI 110 15.01 Lynx 385

816 Kavital 110 Kavital Tap-1 3.6 Lynx 385

817 NPC 110 HATTI 110 19.6 Lynx 385

818 Kavital Tap-1 HATTI 110 12.6 Lynx 385

819 Krishna Hydro 110 GURGUNTA 110 5 Lynx 385

820 SINDHANUR 110 SINDHANUR2 110 8 Lynx 385

821 SINDHANUR2 110 WALKAMDINNI 110 10 Lynx 385

822 KOGANTI 110 WALKAMDINNI 110 0.43 Lynx 385

823 BYAGWAT 110 BYAGWAT tap-1 7.32 Lynx 385

824 SIRWAR-TAP-1 BYAGWAT tap-1 10 Lynx 385

Page 180: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

166 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

825 Mallat 110 SIRWAR 110 15 Coyote 323

826 SIRWAR 110 ALKODU 110 17 Coyote 323

827 ALKODU 110 Galaga 110 10 Lynx 385

828 SINDHANUR 110 MANVI-TAP-1 51.16 Lynx 385

829 MANVI-TAP-1 Manvi 110 10 Lynx 385

830 MANVI-TAP-1 MADALAPUR 110 12 Lynx 385

831 Raichur 110 KURDI CROSS 110 19.8 Coyote 323

832 SIRWAR-TAP-1 Raichur 110 33 Lynx 385

833 Raichur 110 APMC 110 6 Lynx 385

834 Raichur 110 APMC 110 6 Lynx 385

835 APMC 110 CHIKASUGUR 110 9.31 Lynx 385

836 Raichur 110 MALIYABAD 110 17.2 Lynx 385

837 MALIYABAD 110 VADAVATTI 110 11.14 Lynx 385

838 Raichur 110 Matmari 110 23.15 Lynx 385

839 CHIKASUGUR 110 VADAVATTI 110 15 Lynx 385

840 DEODURGA 110 DEODURGA Tap-1 5 Lynx 385

841 KBJNL LIS 110 SHAHAPUR 110 38.92 Lynx 385

842 KEMBHAVI 110 SHAHAPUR 110 36.1 Lynx 385

843 UGAR SUGARS K KEMBHAVI 110 12 Lynx 385

844 SHAHAPUR 110 SHAHAPUR2 110 12 Coyote 323

845 SHAHAPUR 110 SHAHAPUR2 110 12 Wolf 405

846 SHAHAPUR 110 SHORAPUR 110 26 Lynx 385

847 SHAHAPUR 110 YADGIR 110 37.25 Lynx 385

848 KONKAL 110 YADGIR 110 33 Lynx 385

849 SEDAM 110 GURMATKAL 110 40 Lynx 385

850 SHAHAPUR 110 KHANAPUR SH 110 24.3 Lynx 385

851 KHANAPUR SH 110 WADAGERA 110 20.1 Lynx 385

852 CORE GREEN Sugar 110 WADAGERA 110 2.02 Lynx 385

853 KHANAPUR SH 110 SAIDAPUR K 110 36 Lynx 385

854 KHANAPUR SH 110 SUGNANESHWARA 110 17 Lynx 385

855 Sedam Tap-1 CHITAPUR 110 13.3 Lynx 385

Page 181: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 167

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

856 Sedam Tap-1 SEDAM 110 23 Lynx 385

857 Sedam Tap-1 RAJASHREE CEMENTS 110 8.33 Lynx 385

858 Korwar Temple 110 CHITAPUR 110 36.4 Lynx 385

859 Shahabad 110 JEWARGI Tap-1 25 Wolf 405

860 JEWARGI 110 JEWARGI Tap-1 1.5 Wolf 405

861 SHAHAPUR2 110 Nalwar 110 55 Coyote 323

862 Shahabad 110 Wadi Tap-1 12 Wolf 405

863 Wadi Tap-1 Wadi 110 0.6 Lynx 385

864 GULBURGA(S) 110 FARHATABAD 110 12 Lynx 385

865 GULBURGA(W) 110 GULBURGA(S) 110 25 Lynx 385

866 KAPNOOR 110 GULBURGA(W) 110 14 Lynx 385

867 KAPNOOR 110 GULBURGA(N) 110 8 Coyote 323

868 KAPNOOR 110 GULBURGA(N) 110 8 Wolf 405

869 GULBURGA(U) 110 GULBURGA(S) 110 11 Lynx 385

870 KAPNOOR1 110 KAPNOOR 110 0.6 Lynx 385

871 MADYAL 110 KAPNOOR 110 40 Lynx 385

872 Shahabad 110 Mandewali 110 47 Lynx 385

873 NSL SUGARS M 110 MADYAL 110 13.7 Lynx 385

874 CHOWDAPUR 110 MADYAL 110 26 Lynx 385

875 AFZALPUR 110 KARAJGI 110 23.7 Lynx 385

876 AFZALPUR 110 DEVANGAON 110 12 Lynx 385

877 RENUKA SUGARS D 110 DEVANGAON 110 12 Lynx 385

878 Mortagi 110 RENUKA SUGARS D 110 12 Lynx 385

879 Kurkunta Tap-1 SEDAM 110 4 Lynx 385

880 Kurkunta 110 Kurkunta Tap-1 11.03 Lynx 385

881 CHINCHOLI 110 SEDAM 110 44 Lynx 385

882 YEDRAMI Tap-1 Shahabad 110 45 Lynx 385

883 YEDRAMI 110 YEDRAMI Tap-1 16.87 Lynx 385

884 YEDRAMI Tap-1 Indi Tap-4 83 Lynx 385

885 ALLAND Tap-1 MAHAGAON-TAP-2 35 Lynx 385

886 ALLAND 110 ALLAND Tap-1 8 Lynx 385

Page 182: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

168 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

887 ALLAND Tap-1 Kadaganchi 110 17.63 Lynx 385

888 MAHAGAON-TAP-1 MAHAGAON 110 0.6 Wolf 405

889 MARGUTTI Cross 110 MAHAGAON-TAP-1 20 Wolf 405

890 Humnabad 110 MARGUTTI Cross 110 20 Wolf 405

891 Humnabad 110 MAHAGAON-TAP-2 38 Coyote 323

892 Humnabad 110 CHITTAGUPPA 110 16.4 Lynx 385

893 Humnabad 110 HUMNABAD Tap-1 1.4 Lynx 385

894 HUMNABAD Tap-1 HUMNABAD SWT STN 110 0.6 Lynx 385

895 MANNA-E-KHELLI 110 HUMNABAD Tap-1 29.87 Lynx 385

896 HABSIKOTE 110 BIDAR (CHIDRI) 110 2.2 Lynx 385

897 HALLIKHED 110 Humnabad 110 22 Lynx 385

898 HABSIKOTE 110 KAMATHANA 110 12.66 Lynx 385

899 BIDAR (KOLHAR) 110 Bidar Tap-1 3.16 Lynx 385

900 JANAWAD 110 BIDAR (KOLHAR) 110 2.5 Lynx 385

901 NSSK 110 JANAWAD 110 4 Lynx 385

902 BIDAR (CHIDRI) 110 HALABARGA 110 35 Lynx 385

903 RAJESHWAR 110 Humnabad 110 12 Lynx 385

904 SASTHAPUR 110 RAJESHWAR 110 7 Lynx 385

905 SASTHAPUR 110 MANTALA 110 10 Lynx 385

906 LADHA 110 BHALKI 110 14.2 Lynx 385

907 MGSSK 110 BHALKI 110 12.3 Lynx 385

908 BHALKI 110 HALABARGA 110 38.77 Lynx 385

909 SANTPUR 110 HALABARGA 110 51 Lynx 385

910 DONGARGAON 110 SANTPUR 110 18.67 Lynx 385

911 Kamalnagar 110 DONGARGAON 110 13.59 Lynx 385

912 SINDHANUR 110 Turvihal 110 17.46 Lynx 385

913 Hanumanhal 110 HIREGONNAGAR 110 10.58 Lynx 385

914 Metri Tap-1 KAMALAPURA Tap-1 24.5 Lynx 385

915 THORANAGAL 110 Metri Tap-1 5 Lynx 385

916 Metri 110 Metri Tap-1 6.2 Lynx 385

917 Agarwal Tap-1 ALIPURA Tap-1 11.2 Lynx 385

Page 183: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 169

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

918 Halkundi Tap-1 ANANTHPUR ROAD Tap-1 2.5 Lynx 385

919 Halkundi Tap-1 Halkundi 110 3.25 Lynx 385

920 Halkundi Tap-1 BELLARY(S) 110 2.5 Lynx 385

921 CHIKASUGUR 110 Shaktinagar 110 15 Lynx 385

922 Shiggaon 110 SAVANUR 110 15 Lynx 385

923 Tumminakatte 110 Rattihalli 110 18.5 Lynx 385

924 Bidi 110 MK Hubli 110 16.15 Lynx 385

925 Mache 110 Suvarna soudha 110 18.6 Lynx 385

926 Suvarna soudha 110 Hirebaagewadi 110 24 Lynx 385

927 Giri sagar 110 Bisnal Tap-1 5.65 Lynx 385

928 Mahabalipura Tap-3 Jambagi K D 110 8 Lynx 385

929 Bisnal 110 Bisnal Tap-1 15.6 Lynx 385

930 Mahalingapura 110 Itnal 110 25.6 Lynx 385

931 Chandakavate 110 Almel 110 23.8 Lynx 385

932 Kerur 110 Kulageri cross 110 12 Lynx 385

933 KEMBHAVI 110 Aski 110 18 Lynx 385

934 UAS Dharwad 110 Narendra2 110 6 Lynx 385

935 Mruthyanjayanagar 110 Gopankoppa 110 17.65 Lynx 385

936 Hattargi 110 Daddi 110 20 Lynx 385

937 Sultanpur 110 H Hidakal 110 11 Lynx 385

938 Mahalingapura 110 Sultanpur 110 11 Lynx 385

939 Kagwad 110 UGAR 110 13.14 Lynx 385

940 Yallammanawadi 110 Alabal 110 10 Lynx 385

941 Kudachi 110 Yalparatti 110 9.2 Lynx 385

942 Ghataprabha 110 Mantur 110 13.43 Lynx 385

943 Shirabur Tap-1 Shirbur 110 11.9 Lynx 385

944 Shirabur Tap-1 Devaragennur 110 3 Lynx 385

945 Morab 110 Kudachi 110 8.5 Lynx 385

946 Shimoga 110 MPM 110 18 Lynx 385

947 Bilagi 110 Tolmatti Tap-1 7.5 Lynx 385

948 Halaki 110 Jambagi K D 110 13.5 Lynx 385

Page 184: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

170 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# From substation To substation Line length (km) Conductor type Ampacity (amps)

949 Jade 110 Anavatti 110 30 Lynx 385

950 Gajendragad 110 Ron 110 24.9 Lynx 385

951 Suzlon (Herogere) 110 Dambal 110 17 Lynx 385

952 Indi Tap-1 Hiremasali 110 15 Lynx 385

953 Shirguppi Sugar UGAR 110 5 Lynx 385

954 LJVL 110 GURGUNTA 110 5 Drake 710

955 Hatti Gamesa HATTI 110 10 Drake 710

956 Khadakalat 110 Chikkodi 110 13 Lynx 385

957 Tolamatti 110 Tolmatti Tap-1 8.5 Lynx 385

958 Belagumba 110 Kadur Tap 6 0.15 Lynx 385

959 Ripponpet 110 Hosanagara 110 30 Moose 415

960 Dubalgundi Tap-1 Dubalgundi 110 10 Moose 415

961 BHALKI 110 Dubalgundi Tap-1 20 Moose 415

962 RENUKA SUGARS D 110 Ghattarga 110 2 Moose 415

963 MASKI 110 Muddapura 110 10 Moose 415

964 Yeragera 110 MALIYABAD 110 20 Moose 415

965 Bus_CO_Mundargi 110 Mundargi 110 16.5 Lynx 385

Page 185: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 171

Details of Existing Installed Reactors in the KPTCL Grid

Table 21: Details of installed reactors in KPTCL grid as on March 31, 2017

# Connected substation/line Voltage

level (kV)

Rating

in Mvar

Switchable/Non

Switchable

Bus reactor

1 Somanahally 400 1×63 Switchable

2 Bidadi 400 1×63 Switchable

3 BTPS 400kV 400 1×80 Not available

4 Dhoni 400 1×63 Not available

5 Guddadahalli 400 1×50 Not available

6 Guttur 400 1×63 Not available

7 Hassan 400 1×80 Switchable

8 Hassan 400 1×125 Switchable

9 Hiriyur 400 1×63 Switchable

10 Hoody 400 1×63 Not available

11 Kaiga 400 1×63 Not available

12 Kaiga 400 1×63 Not available

13 Kolar 400 1×50 Switchable

14 Kudgi 400 1×125 Switchable

15 Kudgi 400 1×125 Switchable

16 Kudgi 400 1×125 Not available

17 Mysore 400 1×50 Switchable

18 Narendra 400 1×125 Switchable

19 Narendra 400 1×50 Switchable

20 Nelmangala 400 1×63 Not available

21 Raichur 765 1×240 Switchable

22 RTPS 400 1×63 Not available

23 Shantigaram 400 1×80 Not available

24 Talaguppa 400 1×63 Not available

25 Tumkur 400 1×63 Switchable

26 Pavagada PS 400 1×125 Not available

Line reactor

1 Somanahally to Kolar line at Somanahally

end 400 1×50 Switchable

2 Somanahally to Gooty line at Somanahally

end 400 1×63 Non Switchable

3 Guddadahalli to RTPS line at Guddadahalli

end 400 1×50 Not available

4 Guttur to Toranagallu line at Guttur end 400 1×50 Not available

5 Guttur to Hiriyur line 1 at Guttur end 400 1×50 Not available

6 Guttur to Hiriyur line 2 at Guttur end 400 1×50 Not available

7 Nelamangla to Gooty line at Nelamangala

end 400 1×50 Switchable

8 Nelamangla to Hiriyur line at Nelamangala

end 400 1×50 Not available

Page 186: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 172

# Connected substation/line Voltage

level (kV)

Rating

in Mvar

Switchable/Non

Switchable

9 Nelamangla to Hassan line at Nelamangala

end 400 1×50 Not available

10 Nelamangla to Talaguppa line at

Nelamangala end 400 1×50 Not available

11 Nelamangla to Gooty line at Nelamangala

end 400 1×50 Not available

12 Sholapur to Raichur line 1 at Raichur end 765 1×240 Switchable

13 Sholapur to Raichur line 2 at Raichur end 765 1×240 Switchable

14 Talaguppa to Hassan line at Talaguppa end 400 1×50 Not available

15 Talaguppa to Nelamangala line at Talaguppa

end 400 1×50 Not available

Details of Transmission Line Parameters Considered in this Study

Table 22: Transmission line parameters considered in this study

# Line parameters Quad Moose

(400kV)

Twin

Moose

(400kV)

Drake

(220kV)

Lynx

(132kV)

1000Sqmm

XLPE cable

(220kV)

1 Positive Sequence

Resistance (ohm/km/ckt) 0.0147 0.0298 0.08712 0.17 0.0321

2 Positive Sequence

Reactance (ohm/km/ckt) 0.2528 0.332 0.397848 0.378 0.126

3

Positive Sequence

Suseptance, B/2

(mho/km/ckt)

2.29E-

06

1.73E-

06 1.46E-06 1.5E-06 3.23E-05

4 Zero Sequence

Resistance (ohm/km/ckt) 0.248 0.1619 0.29524 0.411 0.13

5 Zero Sequence

Reactance (ohm/km/ckt) 1.000 1.24 1.23904 1.34 0.068

6

Zero Sequence

Suseptance, B/2

(mho/km/ckt)

1.32E-

06

1.12E-

06 8.32E-07 8.17E-07 3.00E-05

7 Ampacity (amps) 2524 1262 710 385 820

Page 187: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 173

Annexure II – Base Case Network Validation with SCADA Flows

(Data considered in this Study the Instant May 05, 2017, 10:09AM)

Transmission Line Power Flow Comparison

Table 23: ETAP Transmission line power flow comparison with SCADA snapshot

# From Bus To Bus

ETAP

flows

in

MW

SCADA

flows in

MW

Difference

(MW)

Difference

(%)

400 kV

1 NELAMANGALA 400 Basthipura (Mysure) 400 405.6 406 0.4 0.1

2 NELAMANGALA 400 Basthipura (Mysure) 400 405.6 406 0.4 0.1

3 BTPS 400 Hiryur PGCIL 400 355.8 355 0.8 0.2

4 KOLAR PGCIL 400 HOODY 400 685.8 683 2.8 0.4

5 KOLAR PGCIL 400 HOODY 400 685.8 683 2.8 0.4

6 BTPS 400 Hiryur PGCIL 400 355.8 354 1.8 0.5

7 RTPS 400 Guddadahalli 400 307.3 309 1.7 0.5

8 Kaiga 400 Narendra PGCIL 400 275.9 274 1.9 0.7

9 Shanthigrama (Hasan) 400 Basthipura (Mysure) 400 212.3 214 1.7 0.8

10 UPCL 400 Shanthigrama (Hasan) 400 143.6 142 1.6 1.1

11 TALAGUPPA 400 Shanthigrama (Hasan) 400 197.7 200 2.3 1.1

12 Kaiga 400 Narendra PGCIL 400 275.9 272 3.9 1.4

13 Shanthigrama (Hasan) 400 Basthipura (Mysure) 400 212.3 216 3.7 1.7

14 Hiryur PGCIL 400 NELAMANGALA 400 386.3 393 6.7 1.7

15 UPCL 400 Shanthigrama (Hasan) 400 143.6 141 2.6 1.8

16 Narendra PGCIL 400 Kudgi New 400 160.7 164 3.3 2

17 BIDADI PGCIL 400 SMHLY PGCIL 400 18.4 18 0.4 2.4

18 Hiryur PGCIL 400 NELAMANGALA 400 386.3 401 14.7 3.7

19 Narendra PGCIL 400 Kudgi New 400 160.7 167 6.3 3.8

20 JSW 400 GUTTUR 400 270.5 282 11.5 4.1

21 Kaiga 400 GUTTUR 400 146.5 153 6.5 4.2

22 Kaiga 400 GUTTUR 400 146.5 153 6.5 4.2

23 JSW 400 BTPS 400 235.5 225 10.5 4.6

24 TUMKUR 400 BIDADI PGCIL 400 365.1 383 17.9 4.7

25 TUMKUR 400 BIDADI PGCIL 400 365.1 383 17.9 4.7

26 RTPS 400 Raichur New 400 166.8 158 8.8 5.6

27 HOODY 400 NELAMANGALA 400 108.1 102 6.1 6

28 TALAGUPPA 400 NELAMANGALA 400 52.5 56 3.5 6.2

29 NELAMANGALA 400 Shanthigrama (Hasan) 400 166.2 178 11.8 6.6

30 HOODY 400 NELAMANGALA 400 108.1 101 7.1 7

31 Guddadahalli 400 GUTTUR 400 141.6 132 9.6 7.2

32 GUTTUR 400 Hiryur PGCIL 400 122 132 10 7.6

33 BIDADI PGCIL 400 SMHLY PGCIL 400 18.4 20 1.6 7.8

34 BIDADI PGCIL 400 NELAMANGALA 400 186.5 203 16.5 8.1

35 GUTTUR 400 Hiryur PGCIL 400 122 133 11 8.3

36 BIDADI PGCIL 400 NELAMANGALA 400 186.5 205 18.5 9

Page 188: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 174

# From Bus To Bus

ETAP

flows

in

MW

SCADA

flows in

MW

Difference

(MW)

Difference

(%)

37 RTPS 400 Raichur New 400 166.8 152 14.8 9.7

38 GUTTUR 400 Narendra PGCIL 400 17 15 2 13.6

39 RTPS 400 BTPS 400 158.9 186 27.1 14.6

41 Kudgi New 400 Kudgi 400 4.8 4 0.8 18.8

42 Kudgi New 400 Kudgi 400 4.8 4 0.8 18.8

43 Kudgi New 400 Kudgi 400 4.8 4 0.8 18.8

44 Kudgi New 400 Kudgi 400 4.8 4 0.8 18.8

45 GUTTUR 400 Narendra PGCIL 400 17 14 3 21.8

46 KOLAR PGCIL 400 SMHLY PGCIL 400 381.3 265 116.3 43.9

47 Kudgi New 400 TUMKUR 400 15.6 31 15.4 49.8

48 Kudgi New 400 TUMKUR 400 15.6 31 15.4 49.8

220 kV

1 Alamatti 220 B Bagewadi 220 54.3 82.2 27.9 33.9

2 Alamatti 220 BAGALKOT 220 54.2 82.7 28.6 34.5

3 Alamatti 220 B Bagewadi 220 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

4 Alamatti 220 BAGALKOT 220 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

5 Bijapur 220 B Bagewadi 220 110.3 106.3 -4 -3.7

6 LINGASUGUR 220 B Bagewadi 220 275.2 294.5 19.3 6.6

7 Bijapur 220 B Bagewadi 220 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

8 LINGASUGUR 220 B Bagewadi 220 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

9 Bijapur 220 INDI 220 59 61.6 2.6 4.3

10 Chintamani 220 KOLAR PGCIL 220 110.5 134.5 23.9 17.8

11 Chintamani 220 KOLAR PGCIL 220

12 KOLAR KP 220 KOLAR PGCIL 220 345.7 351.1 5.5 1.6

13 KOLAR KP 220 KOLAR PGCIL 220

14 MALUR 220 KOLAR KP 220 186.7 193.7 7 3.6

15 MALUR 220 KOLAR KP 220

16 Sarjapura 220 MALUR 220 85.7 85.6 -0.2 -0.2

17 SMHLY 220 NGN PURA 220 184.3 191.2 6.9 3.6

18 SMHLY 220 HSR LT 220 188.2 194.5 6.4 3.3

19 SMHLY PGCIL 220 SMHLY 220 949.7 806 -143.7 -17.8

20 SMHLY PGCIL 220 SMHLY 220

21 HSR LT 220 NGN PURA 220 38.3 47.4 9.1 19.2

22 ITPL 220 HOODY 220 134.6 133 -1.6 -1.2

23 SMHLY 220 HAROHALLI 220 79.8 80.1 0.3 0.4

24 HAROHALLI 220 Kanakapura 220 48 48.3 0.3 0.7

25 PEENYA 220 Hebbal Tap-1 20.4 26.7 6.2 23.4

26 HSR LT 220 HOODY 220 124.3 110.1 -14.2 -12.9

Page 189: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 175

# From Bus To Bus

ETAP

flows

in

MW

SCADA

flows in

MW

Difference

(MW)

Difference

(%)

27 SMHLY 220 TATAGUNI 220 191 189.7 -1.3 -0.7

28 Khodyas 220 SBMPURA 220 112.1 112 -0.1 -0.1

29 RTPS 220 Raichur 220 55.3 55.2 -0.2 -0.3

30 SMHLY 220 YRND HALLI 220 147.9 144 -3.9 -2.7

31 Vajramatti 220 BAGALKOT 220 106.3 142 35.7 25.2

32 Vajramatti 220 BAGALKOT 220

33 BMM ISPAT 220 Ittagi 220 97.4 101 3.7 3.6

34 Lingapur 220 BMM ISPAT 220 97.7 96.9 -0.8 -0.9

35 GUTTUR 220 Davanagere 220

379.9 390.9 11 2.8 36 GUTTUR 220 Davanagere 220

37 GUTTUR 220 Davanagere 220

38 Lingapur 220 Lingapur Tap-1 52.4 65.7 13.3 20.2

39 Shimoga 220 Davanagere 220 111.6 126.5 14.8 11.7

40 GUTTUR 220 Neelagunda 220 22.4 25.8 3.5 13.4

41 Ittagi 220 Neelagunda 220 71.6 69.8 -1.8 -2.5

42 Ranebennur 220 GUTTUR 220 64.5 65.4 0.9 1.4

43 Haveri 220 GUTTUR 220 24.7 11.2 -13.5 -120.8

44 Haveri 220 GUTTUR 220

45 GUTTUR 220 Chitradurga 220 22.9 20 -2.9 -14.5

46 Davanagere 220 Honnali 220 147.2 151.5 4.2 2.8

47 Shimoga 220 Honnali 220 98.4 101 2.6 2.6

48 BIDADI PGCIL 220 Bidadi 220 317.8 308 -9.8 -3.2

49 BIDADI PGCIL 220 Bidadi 220

50 DB PURA 220 DB PURA Tap-1 137.4 129 -8.5 -6.6

51 Bidadi 220 SMHLY 220 231.6 216.5 -15.2 -7

52 Bidadi 220 SMHLY 220

53 ITPL 220 EPIP 220 129.2 129 -0.2 -0.1

54 Hiryur 220 Hiryur PGCIL 220 20.9 19.8 -1.2 -5.9

55 Lingapur 220 MUNIRABAD PH 220 111.6 108.5 -3.2 -2.9

56 BIAL Begur 220 HOSKOTE 220 96.4 96.9 0.5 0.5

57 Hiryur PGCIL 220 GOWRIBIDANUR 220 192 197.9 5.9 3

58 HSR LT 220 NIMHANS 220 80.2 80.7 0.5 0.7

59 NELAMANGALA 220 Magadi 220 34.9 33.4 -1.5 -4.4

60 Hiryur PGCIL 220 GOWRIBIDANUR 220 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

61 Hiryur PGCIL 220 Thallak 220 49.6 45 -4.6 -10.2

62 Yelahanka 220 HOODY 220 100.9 101.1 0.2 0.2

63 Hiryur 220 Madhugiri 220 124.8 126.1 1.3 1.1

64 NELAMANGALA 220 PEENYA 220

453.5 460.5 6.9 1.5 65 NELAMANGALA 220 PEENYA 220

66 NELAMANGALA 220 PEENYA 220

67 NELAMANGALA 220 DB PURA 220 101.7 108 6.3 5.9

68 NELAMANGALA 220 DB PURA 220

Page 190: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 176

# From Bus To Bus

ETAP

flows

in

MW

SCADA

flows in

MW

Difference

(MW)

Difference

(%)

69 Shimoga 220 ANSN HALLY 220 43.5 48.5 5 10.4

70 DB PURA 220 BIAL Begur 220 124.8 125 0.2 0.1

71 HEBBAL 220 HOODY 220 161.5 160.6 -0.8 -0.5

72 Madhugiri 220 GOWRIBIDANUR 220 51 51.4 0.5 0.9

73 NRS 220 A STN 220 48.8 51.5 2.7 5.2

74 VRB VATHI 220 TATAGUNI 220 156.3 155 -1.3 -0.8

75 A STN 220 EDC 220 33.9 31.8 -2.1 -6.6

76 PEENYA 220 NRS 220 140.1 141 1 0.7

77 EDC 220 HAL 220 134.2 132.2 -2 -1.5

78 HAL 220 HOODY 220 329.4 327.6 -1.8 -0.6

79 HAL 220 HOODY 220

80 HOODY 220 W FIELD 220 2 1.6 -0.4 -25

81 NELAMANGALA 220 DOBSPET 220 91.2 87.5 -3.7 -4.2

82 DOBSPET 220 KADUR 220 10.1 15.2 5.1 33.7

83 VARAHI 220 KEMAR 220

245 259 14 5.4 84 VARAHI 220 KEMAR 220

85 VARAHI 220 KEMAR 220

86 UPCL 220 KEMAR 220 235.8 226.9 -8.9 -3.9

87 UPCL 220 KEMAR 220

88 MSEZ 220 KEMAR 220 182.2 182.1 -0.1 0

89 MSEZ 220 KEMAR 220

90 KEMAR 220 NETLAMADNUR 220 124 124.9 0.9 0.7

91 KEMAR 220 NETLAMADNUR 220

92 HASAN 220 NITTUR 220 23.6 20.9 -2.8 -13.2

93 Hadavahalli (GOPALPUR)220 Basthipura 220 73.2 73.1 -0.1 -0.2

94 Hootagalli 220 Basthipura 220 357.6 353 -4.7 -1.3

95 Hootagalli 220 Basthipura 220

96 SMHLY 220 Khodyas 220 160 159.9 -0.1 -0.1

97 Ancheplaya 220 Magadi 220 33.5 33.1 -0.4 -1.2

98 Shantigrama 220 Shimoga 220 38.5 46 7.5 16.2

99 CHIKAMAGALUR 220 Shimoga 220 47 46.7 -0.3 -0.6

100 CHIKAMAGALUR 220 Shantigrama 220 4.1 4 -0.1 -3.5

101 C R NAGARA 220 Kadakola 220 146.2 144.8 -1.4 -1

102 C R NAGARA 220 Kadakola 220

103 C R NAGARA 220 MADHUVANAHALLY 220 73.4 72.5 -0.9 -1.2

104 C R NAGARA 220 MADHUVANAHALLY 220

105 Guddadahalli 220 Lingapur 220 119 91.7 -27.3 -29.7

106 Guddadahalli 220 Lingapur 220

107 MADHUVANAHALLY 220 T K Halli 220 17.6 16.6 -1 -6.2

108 Hadavahalli (GOPALPUR)220 Shantigrama 220 96.7 97.3 0.6 0.6

109 Basthipura 220 Kadakola 220 236.3 235.6 -0.8 -0.3

110 Basthipura 220 Kadakola 220

111 Kadakola 220 Hootagalli 220 67.3 63.5 -3.7 -5.9

Page 191: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 177

# From Bus To Bus

ETAP

flows

in

MW

SCADA

flows in

MW

Difference

(MW)

Difference

(%)

112 VAJAMANGALA 220 Hootagalli 220 157.2 158.2 1 0.6

113 Guddadahalli 220 GUDDADAHALLI Tap-1 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

114 VAJAMANGALA 220 T K Halli 220 67.9 68.5 0.6 0.9

115 C R PATNA 220 K R PET 220 103.1 115 11.9 10.3

116 K R PET 220 TUBINAKERE 220 22.2 28.5 6.3 22.1

117 TUBINAKERE 220 Basthipura 220 105 98.1 -6.9 -7.1

118 KUSHALNAGARA 220 Basthipura 220 96.3 90.9 -5.3 -5.9

119 KUSHALNAGARA 220 Basthipura 220

120 Athani 220 Kudachi 220 27.5 35.5 8 22.5

121 Athani 220 Mahalingapura 220 39.1 30.6 -8.5 -27.8

122 ULTRA TECH 220 GUDDADAHALLI Tap-1 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

123 Kudachi 220 Mahalingapura 220 36.8 50 13.2 26.5

124 Narendra2 220 Kanabargi Swt Stn 220 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

125 Narendra2 220 Kanabargi Swt Stn 220 - -

126 MUKUNDA STEELS 220 KALYAN STEELS 220 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

127 Mahalingapura 220 Narendra PGCIL 220 184.8 186.7 1.9 1

128 Lingapur 220 Kustagi 220 25.2 22.4 -2.8 -12.7

129 Ghataprabha 220 Narendra PGCIL 220 178.3 165 -13.3 -8

130 Ghataprabha 220 Narendra PGCIL 220

131 MK Hubli 220 Narendra PGCIL 220 70.4 69.1 -1.3 -1.9

132 MK Hubli 220 Narendra PGCIL 220

133 Mahalingapura 220 Narendra PGCIL 220 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

134 Chikkodi 220 Belgaum 220 100.7 100.9 0.2 0.2

135 Chikkodi 220 Belgaum 220

136 NELAMANGALA 220 ANSN HALLY 220 89.9 88.2 -1.7 -2

137 NELAMANGALA 220 Ancheplaya 220 78.9 80 1.1 1.4

138 SHARAVATHI 220 Shimoga 220 165.4 173.3 7.8 4.5

139 SHARAVATHI 220 BALLIGAVI 220 64.4 64.3 0 0

140 SIRSI 220 SHARAVATHI 220 43.3 45.9 2.6 5.7

141 LINGASUGUR 220 Kustagi 220 62 58.3 -3.7 -6.3

142 SIRSI 220 SHARAVATHI 220 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

143 TALAGUPPA 220 SHARAVATHI 220 203.2 205.8 2.5 1.2

144 TALAGUPPA 220 SHARAVATHI 220

145 Shimoga 220 ARASIKERE 220 89.1 85.5 -3.6 -4.2

146 NELAMANGALA 220 NITTUR 220 69.1 69.9 0.8 1.1

147 Shimoga 220 KADUR 220 76.3 84 7.6 9.1

Page 192: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 178

# From Bus To Bus

ETAP

flows

in

MW

SCADA

flows in

MW

Difference

(MW)

Difference

(%)

148 Shimoga 220 KIBBANAHALLI 220 55.3 52.9 -2.4 -4.6

149 NELAMANGALA 220 KIBBANAHALLI 220 32.1 35.1 3.1 8.7

150 Shimoga 220 VARAHI 220

90.8 82.3 -8.5 -10.3 151 Shimoga 220 VARAHI 220

152 Shimoga 220 VARAHI 220

153 STRP 220 (Gerusoppa) TALAGUPPA 220 50.9 50.7 -0.2 -0.4

154 NELAMANGALA 220 Hebbal Tap-1 125 129.1 4.1 3.1

155 Kodasalli 220 Kadra 220 7.8 8.8 1 11

156 Mughalkhod 220 Ghataprabha 220 51.5 49.4 -2.1 -4.2

157 Kadra 220 Karwar 220 66.9 65.9 -1.1 -1.6

158 Kadra 220 Karwar 220

159 Bidnal 220 Enercon (Harthi) 220 105.4 101.7 -3.7 -3.6

160 Bidnal 220 Enercon (Harthi) 220

161 Enercon (Harthi) 220 Gadag 220 105.3 98.8 -6.4 -6.5

162 Lingapur 220 MUNIRABAD PH 220 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

163 Bidnal 220 Saundatti 220 76.3 73.6 -2.7 -3.7

164 Bidnal 220 Nagajari 220 112 110 -2 -1.9

165 Nagajari 220 Ambewadi 220 270.3 281.6 11.3 4

166 Nagajari 220 Ambewadi 220

167 Narendra2 220 Ambewadi 220 211.7 222.1 10.4 4.7

168 Narendra2 220 Ambewadi 220

169 Kaiga 220 Kodasalli 220 82.6 77 -5.6 -7.3

170 SRS Hubli 220 Nagajari 220 337.3 332.4 -4.9 -1.5

171 SRS Hubli 220 Nagajari 220

172 SRS Hubli 220 Bidnal 220 102.4 95.5 -6.9 -7.2

173 SRS Hubli 220 Narendra2 220 132.5 134.9 2.3 1.7

174 SRS Hubli 220 Narendra2 220

175 SRS Hubli 220 SIRSI 220 44.2 47.5 3.3 6.9

176 SRS Hubli 220 SIRSI 220

177 Narendra2 220 Haveri 220 97.7 83.8 -13.9 -16.5

178 Narendra2 220 Haveri 220

179 Narendra PGCIL 220 Narendra2 220 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

180 Narendra PGCIL 220 Narendra2 220 - -

181 Vajramatti 220 Mahalingapura 220 15.7 50.5 34.8 68.9

182 Vajramatti 220 Mahalingapura 220

183 JSW 220 Lingapur 220 164.8 159 -5.8 -3.6

184 JSW 220 Lingapur 220

185 BTPS 220 Lingapur 220 58.8 61.5 2.7 4.4

186 ALIPURA 220 BTPS 220 52.2 54.1 1.9 3.5

187 SINDHANUR 220 Lingapur 220 1.6 1.7 0.1 5.4

188 SINDHANUR 220 LINGASUGUR 220 30.7 30.5 -0.2 -0.8

Page 193: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 179

# From Bus To Bus

ETAP

flows

in

MW

SCADA

flows in

MW

Difference

(MW)

Difference

(%)

189 RTPS 220 Raichur 220 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

190 LINGASUGUR 220 RTPS 220

343.1 351.5 8.4 2.4 191 LINGASUGUR 220 RTPS 220

192 LINGASUGUR 220 RTPS 220

193 Shahapur 220 RTPS 220 206.4 201.5 -4.9 -2.4

194 Shahapur 220 RTPS 220

195 Shahapur 220 LINGASUGUR 220 56 61.6 5.6 9.1

196 Sedam 220 RTPS 220 194.4 173.7 -20.7 -11.9

197 Sedam 220 Shahapur 220 26.2 19 -7.2 -37.8

198 Sedam 220 RTPS 220 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

199 SHAHABAD 220 Shahapur 220 76.8 76.4 -0.3 -0.4

200 Humnabad 220 Sedam 220 207.5 181.6 -25.9 -14.3

201 Humnabad 220 Sedam 220

202 Bidadi 220 Toyota 220 15.9 15.9 0 -0.3

203 HALABARGA 220 Humnabad 220 80.2 80.4 0.2 0.2

204 HALABARGA 220 Humnabad 220

205 Shantigrama 220 C R PATNA 220 165 178 13 7.3

206 KADAVINAKOTE (HNPURA) 220 Hadavahalli (GOPALPUR)220 22.9 23.6 0.7 2.8

207 KADAVINAKOTE (HNPURA) 220 Hadavahalli (GOPALPUR)220

208 MSEZ 220 KAVOOR 220 172.4 170.9 -1.5 -0.9

209 MSEZ 220 KAVOOR 220

210 Thallak 220 Chitradurga 220 74.3 89.3 15 16.8

211 TALAGUPPA 220 SHARAVATHI 220 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

212 SRS Hubli 220 Nagajari 220 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

213 SRS Hubli 220 Bidnal 220 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

214 HASAN 220 ARASIKERE 220 50 52.4 2.4 4.6

215 B Bagewadi 220 IPP FF Greenko 220 0.8 0.8 0 0

216 Mughalkhod 220 Chikkodi 220 29.8 28.5 -1.3 -4.4

217 BAGALKOT 220 Gadag 220 149.6 157.4 7.8 5

218 Enercon (Harthi) 220 Gadag 220 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

219 Lingapur 220 Gadag 220 52.4 60 7.6 12.7

220 Kudachi 220 Ghataprabha 220 40.7 0 -40.7 100

221 Humnabad 220 Kapanoor 220 64.9 64 -0.9 -1.4

222 BAGALKOT 220 Gadag 220 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

Page 194: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 180

# From Bus To Bus

ETAP

flows

in

MW

SCADA

flows in

MW

Difference

(MW)

Difference

(%)

223 Humnabad 220 Kapanoor 220 -

SCADA

flow not

available

- -

224 GOWRIBIDANUR 220 RVM 220 0.9 1 0.1 6

Comparison of Bus Voltages

Table 24: ETAP bus voltage comparison with SCADA snapshot

# Bus ID ETAP

voltage (kV)

SCADA voltage

(kV)

Difference

(kV)

Difference

(%)

1 Basthipura (Mysure) 400 385.8 385.8 0.0 0.0

2 BIDADI PGCIL 400 394.4 387.0 -7.4 -1.9

3 BTPS 400 401.8 397.3 -4.5 -1.1

4 Guddadahalli 400 403.4 390.0 -13.4 -3.4

5 GUTTUR 400 406.4 415.5 9.1 2.2

6 Hiryur PGCIL 400 400.7 413.7 13.0 3.1

7 HOODY 400 387.7 SCADA voltage not

available - -

8 JSW 400 402.4 416.3 13.9 3.3

9 Kaiga 400 409.1 418.3 9.2 2.2

10 KOLAR HVDC 400.0 403.0 3.0 0.7

11 KOLAR PGCIL 400 400.0 403.0 3.0 0.7

12 Kudgi New 400 405.0 SCADA voltage not

available - -

13 Kudgi New 765 400.0 SCADA voltage not

available - -

14 Narendra PGCIL 400 407.3 421.0 13.7 3.3

15 NELAMANGALA 400 386.6 384.6 -2.0 -0.5

16 Raichur New 400 403.8 405.5 1.7 0.4

17 RTPS 400 401.0 396.6 -4.4 -1.1

18 Shanthigrama (Hasan) 400 400.3 414.0 13.7 3.3

19 SMHLY PGCIL 400 400.0 403.3 3.3 0.8

20 TALAGUPPA 400 410.0 397.0 -13.0 -3.3

21 TUMKUR 400 400.0 401.8 1.8 0.4

22 UPCL 400 411.5 SCADA voltage not

available - -

Page 195: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 181

Annexure III – Proposed Network

(Data considered in this study post March 31, 2017)

Details of Proposed Generation

Conventional generations

Table 25: Details of proposed conventional generations for FY 18 and FY 19

# Generation

name

Generation

type

No of

units

Unit

capacity

(MW)

Total capacity

(MW) Connected substation

FY 2017-18

1 Munirabad Mini hydro 1 10 10 Munirabad PH 110

FY 2018-19

1 Yelahanka CCGP Gas 1 370 370 Yelahanka 220kV

Page 196: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

182 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

Non conventional generations

Solar generation

Table 26: Details of proposed solar generations for FY 18 and FY 19

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

FY 2017-18

1 Ishwar Shivalingappa Matagar Hukkeri Hukkeri Belgaum 2 Hukkeri 110

2 Sharda Doddi Hamilapur Bidar Bidar 1 Habsikote 110

3 Iravva R Patil Kurugunda Bailhongal Belgaum 3 Kurkunta 110

4 Ramu G Kuderu Chamarajanag

ara

Chamarajan

agara 3 C r nagara 220

5 Pandu Ramappa Dasar Kulagod Gokak Belgaum 1 Davaleshwar 110

6 Bhaskar Rao Jonnikeri Aurad Bidar 3 Dongargaon 110

7 Kamala Bai Jonnikeri Aurad Bidar 3 Dongargaon 111

8 Babu G Kallur Madamgeri Savadatti Belgaum 3 Saundatti 220

9 H Kamalakshi Tambralli Bellary Bellary 1 Aakshaya

Colony 110

10 Pallavi S Hunasankodihalli Kanakapura Ramanagara 3 Kanakapura 220

11 Tulasiram Kampli Hospet Bellary 2 KAMPLI 110

12 Ramesh C Jigajinagi Bhoothanala Bijapur Bijapur 3 Bhutnal 110

13 Photon suryakiran Pvt Ltd (M/s. Today Green Power Pvt. Ltd.) Varavu Challakere Chitradurga 10 Thallak 220

14 Cheluvaraju Channamanagathihalli

kaval Challkere Chitradurga 1 Thallak 220

Page 197: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 183

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

15 Mallikarjuna Gundappa jigada Alanda Kalburgi 1 ALLAND 110

16 S.Shashidar Gadhikere Hagaribomma

nahalli Bellary 2 Ittagi 220

17 Malati B Raddy Bannur Ramdurg Belgaum 1 Vajamangala 220

18 Marakka Channamanagathihalli

kaval Challkere Chitradurga 1 Thallak 220

19 G Mahseh Channamanagathihalli

kaval Challkere Chitradurga 3 Thallak 220

20 Rajamma Channammanagattana

halli kavalu Challkere Chitradurga 2 Thallak 220

21 Sreenidhi V Thalavatti Hiriyur Chitradurga 1 Hiryur 220

22 Devubai Anumanahalli Ramanagara Ramanagara 1 Bidadi 220

23 Bommappa Kenchikoppa Bin Marigowdappa (Amarthya

Rajshekarappa) Thuglalahalli Honnalli Davanagere 2 Honnali 220

24 AR Rekha Guttahalli Chintamani Chikkaballa

pura 1 Chintamani 220

25 HP Rajesh Gopalagondanahalli Jagaluru Davanagere 3 Thallak 220

26 Manjunath KT JG halli Hiriyur Chitradurga 2 Hiryur 220

27 Jayalakshmi JG halli Hiriyur Chitradurga 1 Hiryur 220

28 Ramachandra K Raju sulthanapura koppala Koppal 2 Koppal 110

29 D Ramlingaiha Mragronahalli KR pet Mandya 3 Chikamagalur

220

30 K Sharada Guttahalli Chintamani Chikkaballa

pura 1 Chintamani 220

31 Manjunath R Kabadi Kalasapura Gadag Gadag 1 Gadag 220

32 T Vijaykumar Kiragandhuru Mandya Mandya 1 Nagenahalli 110

33 KH Lakshmamma Hunasankodihalli Kanakapura Ramanagara 3 Kanakapura 220

34 Mohan Gowda H Adaappa Goudar Kurthakoti Gadag Gadag 2 Gadag 220

35 Ananda.R.Jigajinagi Arkere Bijapur Bijapur 3 Bhutnal 110

Page 198: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

184 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

36 R Anantha kumar Doddasomanahalli KR pete Mandya 2 Chikamagalur

220

37 R Gayathri Haralalu Kanakapura Ramanagara 2 Kanakapura 220

38 Lakshmamma Ganganala tumkur Tumkur 1 ANSN HALLY

220

39 Kamali Bai Gaddethimanahalli Madhugiri Tumkur 3 Madhugiri 220

40 Gangaraju Gadhikere Hagaribomma

na halli Bellary 3 Ittagi 220

41 Krishna Naik Thumulu Madhugiri Tumkur 2 Madhugiri 220

42 Hanumant Fakirappa Waddar @ Pathrot Chikkanandi Belagavi Belgaum 1 Gokak 110

43 Smt. Shobha Shidramappa Waddar @ Pathrot Chikkanandi Gokak Belgaum 1 Gokak 110

44 R M Lakshmana kyathagiri pavagada Tumkur 3 Pavagada 220

45 RM Rama Kyathagiri Pavagada Tumkur 3 Pavagada 220

46 H.V.Chowdary chikkahalli pavagada

taluk Tumkur 3 Pavagada 220

47 Tapam Renewable Energy Pvt Ltd Sugatur Kolar Kolar 1 Kolar KP 220

48 Balasimha Rao Ramanadurga pavagada Tumkur 3 Pavagada 220

49 Renew Solar Power Pvt Ltd (Renew Wind Energy (MP four)

Pvt Ltd) Chincholi Chincholli Kalburgi 20 Kapnoor 110

50 Aditya Birla Solar Ltd Bellati Shrirahatti Gadag 20 Bellahatti 110

51 Aditya Birla Solar Ltd Katkol Ramdurg Belgaum 20 Katkol 110

52 Sukhbir Solar energy pvt ltd Haradanahalli Nagamangala Mandya 5 K R pet 220

53 Asian Fab Tech Ltd Alakapura &

Bommasandra

Gowribidanur

u

Chikkaballa

pura 20

Gowribidanur

220 kV

54 Wardha Solar (Maharashtra)Pvt Ltd SPV of Paramapujya Solar

Energy Pvt Ltd Nalwar Chittapur Kalburgi 40 Nalwar 110 kV

55 Wardha Solar (Maharashtra)Pvt Ltd SPV of Paramapujya Solar

Energy Pvt Ltd Kallur Yelburga Koppal 10 Yelburga 110 kV

56 Wardha Solar (Maharashtra)Pvt Ltd SPV of Paramapujya Solar

Energy Pvt Ltd Yatnal Vijayapura Vijayapura 10 Bhutnal 110 kV

Page 199: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 185

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

57 Wardha Solar (Maharashtra)Pvt Ltd SPV of Paramapujya Solar

Energy Pvt Ltd Rajeshwar

Basavakalyan

a Bidar 50

Rajeshwar 110

kV

58 Solitaire Powertech Pvt Ltd SPV of Hindustan Cleanenergy

Limited Kanajanahalli Hiriyur Chitradurga 30 Pavagada 220 kV

59 SolarArise India Projects Pvt. Ltd SPV of Talettutayi Solar One

Projects Pvt. Ltd. Yelburga Yelburga Koppal 30 Yelburga 110 kV

60 Energon Soleq Ravi India Power Resources Pvt. Ltd. Guttigoli Ramadurga Belagavi 100 Ramadurga 110

kV

61 MBP Solar Pvt Ltd SPV of Patil Constructions &

Infrastructure Ltd Lingi Aurad Bidar 40

Santhapur 110

kV

62 Bosch Limited Industrial area, Bidadi

Hobli, Ramanagara Ramanagar 3.5 Bidadi 220 kV

63 Asian Fab Tech Ltd Near Yediyuru Nagamangala Mandya 15 Mayasandra 110

kV

64 BVH Hydel Pvt Ltd Shivaganga , thalya hobli, Holalkere Chitradurga 1 Chitradurga 220

kV

65 Esskay Power Kamadahalli, Koratagere Tumkur 1 Madhugiri 220

kV

66 Hero Solar Energy Pvt Ltd (Clean solar power (Tumkur) pvt

ltd) Marenadu

Chikkanayaka

nahalli Tumkur 20

Chikkanayakana

halli 110 kV

67 Clean Solar Power Pvt Ltd Thimmalapura &

Vitalapura Molakalmuru Chitradurga 20 Thallak 220 kV

68 Shivam solar pvt ltd KASABA HOBLI,

JAGALUR Jagalur Davanagere 5

Davanagere 220

kV

69 Sri Swarna Green Power Mavinahonda Raibagh Belagavi 4 Raibagh 110 kV

70 Embassy Energy Pvt Ltd Gudegudda Hangal Haveri 100 Guledagudda

110 kV

71 Renew Solar Power Pvt Ltd (Renew Wind Energy (Rajasthan

Four) Pvt Ltd) - Turuvekere Tumkur 20

Turuvekere 110

kV

72 Rishabh Buildwell Pvt Ltd Bennihalli Harapanahalli Davanagere 14 Kabbur 110 kV

73 Rays Power Expert Pvt Ltd (Mighty Avengers Solar Pvt Ltd) - Chikkabalapur

a

Chikkaballa

pura 10

Chintamani 220

kV

Page 200: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

186 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

74 Hero Solar Energy Pvt Ltd [Clean Solar power(tumkur) Pvt

Ltd] - Koratagere Tumkur 20

Madhugiri 220

kV

75 Hero Solar Energy Pvt Ltd [Clean Solar power(tumkur) Pvt

Ltd] Shettihalli

Chamrajanaga

ra

Chamarajan

agar 20

Chamarajanagar

220 kV

76 Clean MaxHarsh Solar LLP(SP) Tondihatti Madhugiri Tumkur 4.5 Madhugiri 220

kV

77 Alpha Devanahalli Propoerties Thavandi Hiriyur Chitradurga 20 Hiriyur 220 kV

78 Clean Max SonnaSolar LLP(SP Sonna Grama Hagari

Bommanahalli Bellary 48 Ittagi 220 kV

79 Hero Solar Energy Pvt Ltd [Clean Solar power(tumkur) Pvt

Ltd] -

Kollegala+Ha

nnur

Chamarajan

agar 20

Madhuvanahalli

220 kV

80 Hero Solar Energy Pvt Ltd [Clean Solar power(tumkur) Pvt

Ltd] - Gundlupet

Chamarajan

agar 20

Chamarajanagar

220 kV

81 Hero Solar Energy Pvt Ltd (Clean solar power (Tumkur) pvt

ltd) - Madhugiri Tumkur 20

Madhugiri 220

kV

82 Renew Solar Power Pvt Ltd (Renew Wind Energy

(Maharashtra) Pvt Ltd Saidapur Yadgiri Yadgir 20

Saidapur K 110

kV

83 Parampujya Solar Energy Pvt Ltd Satyampet Shorapur Yadgir 10 Shorapur 110 kV

84 Karvy Consultants Ltd [Shorapur solar power system ltd] Shorapur/kembhavi Shorapur Yadgir 10 Shorapur 110 kV

85 Hero Solar Energy Pvt Ltd [Clean Solar Energy Pvt Ltd] Wadgere Shahpur Yadgir 20 Wadgere 110 kV

86 Hero Solar Energy Pvt Ltd [Clean Solar Energy Pvt Ltd] Kolkera Chittapur Kalburgi 20 Chittapur 110 kV

87 Renew Solar Power Pvt Ltd [Bhumi prakash pvt ltd] - Devadurga Raichur 20 -

88 Hero Solar Energy Pvt Ltd [Clean Solar Energy Pvt Ltd] - Gangavati Koppal 20 Devadurga 110

kV

89 Essel Green Energy Pvt Ltd (KN Indi Vijaypura Solar Energy

Pvt Ltd) Rajanal/Kotnal Indi Vijayapura 20 Indi 220 kV

90 Marikal Solar Parks Pvt Ltd (Kodangal Solar Park Pvt Ltd) Nagavada Basavana

bagevadi Vijayapura 20

B Bagewadi 220

kV

91 Mytrah Energy Ltd Yenkanchi Sindagi Vijayapura 15 Mandewali 110

kV

92 Aditya Birla Nuvo Ltd Byrakur GSS Mulbagal Kolar 20 Kolar 220 kV

93 Essel Green Energy Pvt Ltd (KN Bijapura Solar Energy Pvt

Ltd) Kalkavatagi

Bijapura+Nag

atana Vijayapura 20

Takkalakki 110

kV

Page 201: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 187

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

94 Marikal Solar Parks Pvt Ltd (Anantapur Solar Parks Pvt Ltd) Reddy Nagnur Naragund Gadag 20 Naragund 110

kV

95 Marikal Solar Parks Pvt Ltd [Tungabhadra Solar Parks Pvt Ltd] Umrani Chikkodi Belagavi 20 Chadchan 110

kV

96 Essel Green Energy Pvt Ltd [ KN Sindagi Solar Energy Pvt

Ltd] Kokatanoor Sindagi Vijayapura 5

Takkalakki 110

kV

97 OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd [Aavanti Solar Energy Pvt Ltd] Kamanahalli Shiggaon Haveri 20 Shiggoa 110 kV

98 Essel Green Energy Pvt Ltd [KN Muddebihal solar energy pvt

ltd] Chelumi Muddebihal Vijayapura 20

Muddebihal 110

kV

99 OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd [Mayfair renewable energy pvt

ltd] Nargel Ron Gadag 20 Nargel 110 kV

100 Mytrah Energy Ltd (Mytrah Advaith Power Pvt Ltd) Chittawadagi hunagund Bagalkot 15 Hunagunda 110

kV

101 Mytrah Energy Ltd (Mytrah Akshaya Energy Pvt Ltd) Mantur Raibagh Belagavi 15 Mantur 110 kV

102 Tata power solar system ltd (Chitrasthayee saurya Ltd) Ragunathpura Srinivasapura Kolar 20 Chintamani 220

kV

103 AMPL Cleantech Pvt Ltd (NVR renew pvt ltd) - Holalkere Chitradurga 20 Chitradurga 220

kV

104 Tata power solar system ltd (Chitrasthayee saurya Ltd) Manahalli bidar rural Bidar 10 Manekalli 110

kV

105 Tata power solar system ltd (Chitrasthayee saurya Ltd) Kanakagiri Gangavati Koppal 17 Kanakagiri 110

kV

106 Emmvee photovoltaic power pvt ltd (ES Solar Pvt ltd) - Bidar Bidar 10 Hasbikote 110

kV

107 Emmvee photovoltaic power pvt ltd [ES energy] - kunigal Tumkur 10 Anchepalya 220

kV

108 Emmvee photovoltaic power pvt ltd (ES Sun Power Pvt Ltd) - Bagepalli Chikkaballa

pura 20

Chintamani 220

kV

109 Swelect energy systems ltd Jiddigere kunigal Tumkur 10 Anchepalya 220

kV

110 Microsun solar tech pvt ltd [Megasun Solar Tech Pvt Ltd] - kanakagiri Koppal 3 Kanakagiri 110

kV

Page 202: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

188 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

111 Adani Green Energy Kadaramandalagi Byadagi Haveri 20 Bydagi 110 kV

112 Adani Green Energy Madapooradadodi Channapatann

a Ramanagar 20 T K Halli 220 kV

113 Krishi Technologies Pvt Ltd - Chikkabalapur

a

Chikkaballa

pura 10

Chintamani 220

kV

114 Growthstreet Consultants Pvt Ltd Benihalli Harapanahalli Davanagere 4 Neelagunda 220

kV

115 Asian Fab Tech Ltd Kavalahalli Doddaballapur

a

Bengaluru

rural 10

Chintamani 220

kV

116 Adani Green Energy Gopipura Gubbi Tumkur 20 Gubbi 110 kV

117 Adani Green Energy Alladahalli Holenarasipur

a Hassan 20 T K Halli 220 kV

118 Adani Green Energy Hipperga Jevargi Kalburgi 20 Jevargi 110 kV

119 Adani Green Energy Malguru K R Pet Mandya 20 KR pet 220 kV

120 Adani Green Energy Thirta Bandahatti Maaluru Kolar 20 Malur 220 kV

121 Adani Green Energy Gajjarguppe Magadi Ramanagar 20 Magadi 220 kV

122 Adani Green Energy Kallakere Periyapattana Mysore 20 Hasan 220 kV

123 Adani Green Energy Hosadodi Ramanagara Ramanagar 20 Kanakapura 220

kV

124 Adani Green Energy Vijayapura T Narasipura Mysore 20 Hasan 220 kV

125 OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd (Aavanti Renewable energy pvt

ltd) Mathode Hosadurga Chitradurga 20 Yagati 110 kV

126 Adani Green Energy Thimmalapura Tipatturu Tumkur 20 Anthrasanahalli

220 kV

127 Mandi Durgappa Channammanagathihalli Challakere Chitradurga 1 Thallak 220 kV

128 Thimmannna Channammanagathihalli Challakere Chitradurga 1 Thallak 220 kV

Page 203: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 189

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

129 M R C Chouhan Mussenalu Honnalli Davanagere 2 Honnali 110 kV

130 Jyothi Chouhan Mussenalu Honnalli Davanagere 2 Honnali 110 kV

131 C S Nanjundaiah shyasamaru Sira Tumkur 2 Hiriyur 220 kV

132 B.S. Anoop Kumar Channammanagathihalli Challakere Chitradurga 3 Thallak 220 kV

133 H.V Thimmaiah Vetakalluguda Hiriyur Chitradurga 3 Hiriyur 220 kV

134 A.S.Vyramudi Hireehalli Challkere Chitradurga 3 Thallak 220 kV

135 GRT Jewellers Pvt Ltd - Kanakapura Ramanagar 20 Kanakapura 220

kV

136 H.Ramanjaneya chikkahalli Pavagada Tumkur 3 Pavagada 220 kV

137 Murali M Baldev Venkatapura Pavagada Tumkur 3 Pavagada 220 kV

138 Siddalingamma kadapalagere Pavagada Tumkur 3 Pavagada 220 kV

139 Muniraj M kyathagiri Pavagada Tumkur 3 Pavagada 220 kV

140 Sri Gurugunda Bramheshwara Swamy Mutt Naduru Sira Tumkur 3 Hiriyur 220 kV

141 Y.Satyanarayanappa bheemanakunte Pavagada Tumkur 3 Pavagada 220 kV

142 Irappa Roopsing Naik Honaganahalli Babaleshwara Vijayapura 1 Bableshwar 110

kV

143 Ashok Bhima Dhotre Adiasanga Indi Vijayapura 1 Indi 220 kV

144 Renew Solar Power Pvt Ltd (Renew Wind Energy (Rajasthan

four) Pvt Ltd) - Honnalli Davanagere 20 Honnali 110 kV

145 Sunil Roopsingh Rathod Thidagundi Bijapur Vijayapura 1 Atharga 110 kV

146 Ravi Shivappa Padasalagi Kannur village Bijapur Vijayapura 1 Bijapur city 110

kV

147 Shakuntala Naik Araladinni Basavana

bagevadi Vijayapura 1

B Bagewadi 220

kV

148 ACME Kaithal Solar Power Private Limited SPV of ACME

Solar Holdings Pvt Ltd Chittaguppa Homnabad Bidar 40

Chittaguppa 110

kV

149 ACME Koppal Solar Energy Private Limited SPV of ACME

Solar Holdings Pvt Ltd Sagare Khanapur Belagavi 40 Bidi 110 kV

150 ACME Vijayapura Solar Energy Pvt Ltd SPV of ACME Solar

Holdings Pvt Ltd Neelamhalli Bhalki Bidar 40 Bhalki 110 kV

Page 204: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

190 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

151 ACME Babadham Solar Power Private Limited SPV of ACME

Solar Holdings Pvt Ltd Amravati Manvi Raichur 40 Manvi 110 kV

152 Clean Solar Power (Gulbarga) Pvt Limited SPV of Hero Solar

Energy Private Limited Kurdi Manvi Raichur 50 Manvi 110 kV

153 Clean Solar Power (Gulbarga) Pvt Limited SPV of Hero Solar

Energy Private Limited - Sindanooru Raichur 40

Sindhanur 110

kV

154 Clean Solar Power (Gulbarga) Pvt Limited SPV of Hero Solar

Energy Private Limited Santapura Aurad Bidar 40

Dangargoan 110

kV

155 OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd (Brics Renewable Energy Pvt

ltd) Uchangidurga/Mellekatte Harapanahalli Davanagere 2

Neelagunda 220

kV

156 Clean Solar Power (Gulbarga) Pvt Limited SPV of Hero Solar

Energy Private Limited Margutti Kalaburgi Kalburgi 40 Margutti 110 kV

157 Clean Solar Power (Gulbarga) Pvt Limited SPV of Hero Solar

Energy Private Limited Bejjihalli Sira Tumkur 30 Hiriyur 220 kV

158 JKPetroenergy pvt Ltd SPV of JKPetroeenergy Betagera Koppal Koppal 10 Gokak 110 kV

159 Karanataka Power Corporation Limited, Bangalore Chandapur Shiggaon Haveri 10 Savanur 110 kV

160 Wardha Solar (Maharashtra)Pvt Ltd SPV of Paramapujya Solar

Energy Pvt Ltd Kallur Yelburga Koppal 40 Yelburga 110 kV

161 Wardha Solar (Maharashtra)Pvt Ltd SPV of Paramapujya Solar

Energy Pvt Ltd Hattiguduru Shahpur Yadgir 50 Shapur 220 kV

162 Wardha Solar (Maharashtra)Pvt Ltd SPV of Paramapujya Solar

Energy Pvt Ltd Madhuvanahalli Kollegala

Chamarajan

agar 50

Madhuvanahalli

220 kV

163 Wardha Solar (Maharashtra)Pvt Ltd SPV of Paramapujya Solar

Energy Pvt Ltd Maskal Aurad Bidar 50

Santhapur 110

kV

164 Wardha Solar (Maharashtra)Pvt Ltd SPV of Paramapujya Solar

Energy Pvt Ltd Madhuvanahalli Kollegala

Chamarajan

agar 50

Madhuvanahalli

220 kV

165 Wardha Solar (Maharashtra)Pvt Ltd SPV of Paramapujya Solar

Energy Pvt Ltd Yatnal Vijayapura Vijayapura 40 Bhutnal 110 kV

166 KSPDCL Tirumani, Pavagada Tumkur 1000 Pavagada PS 220

FY 2018-19

1 KSPDCL Tirumani, Pavagada Tumkur 1000 Pavagada PS 220

2 Amplus KN Solar Pvt Ltd Kurthakothi Gadag Gadag 170 Enercon (Harthi)

220

Page 205: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 191

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

3 Sagitaur Venture India Pvt Ltd Nayakanahatti Challkere Chitradurga 70 Thallak 220

4 Avaada Power Projects Pvt Ltd Karadihalli Molakalmuru Chitradurga 60 Jagalur 220

5 Avaada Power Projects Pvt Ltd Janakal Hosadurga Chitradurga 60 Hiryur PGCIL

220

6 Avaada Power Projects Pvt Ltd Ilkal Ilkal Bagalkot 60 Ilkal 110

7 Atria Solar Power (Chamrajnagar) Pvt Ltd Kyatanakere Indi Vijayapura 50 Atharga 110

8 Gamesa Renewable Pvt Ltd Kerkalamatti Badami Bagalkot 50 BAGALKOT

110

9 M/s Gamesa Renewable Pvt. Ltd Kirala Shahpur Yadgir 50 SHAHAPUR

110

10 Infosys Ltd Dyagerahalli Sira Tumkur 40 Hiryur PGCIL

220

11 Cleanmax Power Projects Pvt Ltd Minahalli Bellary Bellary 40 PD Halli 110

12 Atria Solar Power (Chamrajnagar)Pvt Ltd Kogalli & Kodalli Hagari

Bommanahalli Bellary 30 Ittagi 220

13 Atria Solar Power (Chamrajnagar)Pvt Ltd Halladpura Gundlupet Chamarajan

agar 30

C R NAGARA

66

14 Gamesa Renewable Pvt Ltd Bandalli Kollegala Chamarajan

agar 30

MADHUVANA

HALLY 220

15 Gamesa Renewable Pvt Ltd Holavanahalli Koratagere Tumkur 30 Madhugiri 220

16 Abhimaani Publications Ltd Upparahosahalli village,

Tekkalakote Siraguppa Bellary 24 Tekkalaki 110

17 Mysore Mercantile Co Ltd Vittalapura Molakalmuru Chitradurga 22 Halkundi 110

18 Renew Wind Energy (Budh 3) Pvt Ltd Nirna Homnabad Bidar 20 MANNA-E-

KHELLI 110

19 Renew Wind Energy (Budh 3) Pvt Ltd hikur Shahpur Yadgir 20 SHAHAPUR

110

20 Clean Solar power (Bellary) Pvt Ltd Karekallu Bellary Bellary 20 Janaki 110

21 Shri Keshav Cement & Infra Ltd Bisarahalli Yelburga Koppal 20 Koppal 110

22 M/s Gamesa Renewable Pvt. Ltd Thagaduru Nanjanagudu Mysore 20 Kadakola 66

23 M/s Gamesa Renewable Pvt. Ltd Thagaduru Nanjanagudu Mysore 20 Kadakola 66

Page 206: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

192 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

24 Gokak Power & Energy Ltd Gokak falls Gokak Belagavi 20 Gokak 110

25 Gamesa Wind turbines Pvt Ltd-Ittigi Near Sonna Hagari

Bommanahalli Bellary 15 Ittagi 220

26 KARLE Homes Pvt Ltd Gandihalli Sira Tumkur 15 Hiryur PGCIL

220

27 M/s Gamesa Renewable Pvt. Ltd Kadamgeri Shahpur Yadgir 15 WADAGERA

110

28 KCL Re Energy Pvt Ltd Kurubarahalli Mulbagal Kolar 10 KOLAR 66

29 Gamesa Wind turbines Pvt Ltd P D Kote (Parasurama

Devara Kote) Hiriyur Chitradurga 10

Hiryur PGCIL

220

30 Gamesa Wind turbines Pvt Ltd Near Venkatapura Pavagada Tumkur 10 Pavagada 220

31 Global Tech Park Pvt Ltd Hosakote Sira Tumkur 10 Pavagada 66

32 Velstand Solar Pvt Ltd Bankapur Gangavati Koppal 10 KANAKAGIRI

110

33 Helios Fusion Energy Pvt Ltd Mudatanur Siraguppa Bellary 10 KURUGODU

110

34 Genial Energy House Pvt Ltd Dadesgur Sindanooru Raichur 10 DADESUGUR

110

35 Prabhuraj Solar Energy Pvt Ltd Gandal Yelburga Koppal 10 GANADHAL

110

36 East Man International - Yelburga Koppal 10 YELBURGA

110

37 Sri Adithya Green Power Pvt Ltd Kukanpalli Koppal Koppal 10 Guddadahalli

220

38 VIP Infrabuild Projects Pvt lTd Allavandi Koppal Koppal 10 Koppal 110

39 Basava Renewable Energy Pvt Ltd Talakal Yelburga Koppal 10 Uppin Betagere

110

40 Matrix Green Energy Private Limited Konkala Wadegere Yadgir 8.5 CORE GREEN

Sugar 110

41 Refex energy Thimmala Naikana Betta Pavagada Tumkur 7 Pavagada 66

42 Matrix Green Energy Private Limited Valkamdinni, Sindanooru Raichur 6.5 WALKAMDIN

NI 110

Page 207: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 193

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

43 Bharti Airtel Limited Kammaravaripalli Bagepalli Chikkaballa

pura 6

MITTERMARI

66

44 Banashankari Energy Pvt Ltd - Yelburga Koppal 6 YELBURGA

110

45 Memisis Solar Energy Private Ltd Pallavalli, nagalmadike

hobli, Pavagada Tumkur 5 Pavagada 66

46 Pragathi Group Hiremallanahole Jagalur Davanagere 5 Thallak 220

47 ReNew Saur Vidut Pvt Ltd Bidadi Ramanagara Ramanagar 3.2 Bidadi 66

48 Supakhalanas Sour Vidyuth Pvt Ltd., Sugutur kolar Kolar 3 KOLAR 66

49 Pristine Solar Park Pvt Ltd Oolvadi , kasaba hobli Chintamani Chikkaballa

pura 3 Chintamani 66

50 Fortune Cotton & Agro Industries Devasamudra Molakalmuru Chitradurga 2 Halkundi 110

51 TVS Motor Company Ltd Byatha Nanjanagudu Mysore 1.5 Kadakola 66

52 B. Lingaraju * Muganakoppalu Malavalli Mandya 1 SIVASAMUDR

AM 66

53 Vahini Irrigation Pvt Ltd Honnudike Tumkur Tumkur 1 DOBSPET 66

54 Kalaskar Infrastructures Dongeragaon Kalaburgi Kalburgi 1 MARGUTTI

Cross 110

55 Dasappa Y Huchbasavanahalli Tumkur Tumkur 1 ANSN HALLY

66

56 Subash Maruti Patankar Kokatanoor Athani Belagavi 1 Yallammanawadi

110

57 Reitz India Pvt Ltd - Sira Tumkur 15 Madhugiri 220

58 Sun Veda - Koratagere Tumkur 2 Madhugiri 220

59 Embassy Services Pvt Ltd - Madhugiri Tumkur 100 TUMKUR (New

Madhugiri)220

60 Golden Hatcheries Huyildore Sira Tumkur 20 Thimmanahalli

110

61 Shree Jai Santhoshimatha Solar Plant Mudlamachikere ,Kasaba

Hobli, Jagalur Davanagere 1.5 Jagalur 220

62 Sathya Deeptha Pharmaceuticals ltd Chittaguppa Homnabad Bidar 5 Humnabad 110

63 Hutti Gold Mines ltd M.Kota Lingasugur Raichur 14 Lingasugur 110

Page 208: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

194 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected

substation

64 VSAA Energy Pvt Ltd Davanadahosa Halli Chikkanayaka

nahalli Tumkur 50 Halukurke 110

Wind generation

Table 27: Details of proposed wind generations for FY 18 and FY 19

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected substation

FY 2017-18

1 Fortune Five Hydel Projects (P) Limited Ingeshwara Basavanababewadi Bijapur 80 B Bagewadi 220

2 GM Navara Wind Energy Private Limited Babaleshwara Bijapur Bijapur 100 GM NAVARA 220

3 GM Navara Wind Energy Private Limited Babaleshwara Bijapur Bijapur 100 GM NAVARA 220

4 Vish Wind Infrastructure LLP Jogihalli Davangere/Bellary Davangere/Bellary 150 Guttur Vishwind 220

5 Vish Wind Infrastructure LLP Jogihalli Davangere/Bellary Davangere/Bellary 150 Guttur Vishwind 220

6 Bhoruka Power Corporation Limited Yelisurur Gadag Gadag 58.2 Mundargi 110

7 Green Infra Wind Energy Solutions Limited Harpanahalli Davangere Davangere 36 Davanagere 220

8 Green Infra Wind Energy Solutions Limited Harpanahalli Davangere Davangere 48 Davanagere 220

9 Bharat Earth Movers Limited Mattikod Koppal/bagalkot Koppal/bagalkot 18 Kustagi 110

10 Tejashri developers Private Limited Belthadi Gadag gadag 40 Bellahatti 110

FY 2018-19

1 Vyshali Energy Private Limited Kumatagi - Bijapur 100 Bus_WI_Kumatagi 220

2 Devarahipparagi Wind Power Private Limited Devarahipparagi - Bijapur 100 Bus_WI_Kumatagi 220

3 Four EF wind power private limited Jogimatti - Chitradurga 19.95 Chitradurga 220

4 Fortune five minral exports private limited Rajur and Vadegol - Gadag 99 Kustagi 220

Page 209: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 195

Mini hydro generation

Table 28: Details of proposed mini hydro generations for FY 18 and FY 19

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected substation

FY 2017-18

1 MALLAPURA - - - 9 MALLPURA 110

2

1. International Power Corporation Private Limited, (Formerly 2. M/s.

Prasanna Power Private Limited (Formerly 1 M/s. Prasanna Power Ltd)

2. Dishaa Power Corporation Ltd

3. Mount Kailash Power Projects Pvt. Ltd. - - - 21.3 AMR RITWK 110

3

1. Moodabagil Power company

2. Vasgi power - - - 1.15 Honnali 220

4

1. Sandur Manganese & Iron Ores Ltd.

2. Flax Hydro Energy Pvt. Ltd.

3. Sai Nireeha Power Pvt. Ltd. - - Udupi 22.5 HASAN 220

5 AMBUTHIRTHA - - Shimoga 22 Jog 110

6 AMR + RITHWIK+Perla - - - 58 AMR RITWK 110

7 ATRIA - - - 24 T K Halli 220

8 ATRIA - - - 16 TUBINAKERE 220

9 ATRIA HYDEL - - Mandya 6.6 T K Halli 220

10 Bhavana Hydro Electric Private Limited - - Yadgir 2 Shahapur 220

11 BHORUKA - - Koppal 18 BPCL M 110

12 BHORUKA POWER

- - Yadgir 24

BPCL (CHAYADEVI PH)

110

13 Bonal Hydro Electric company - - Gulbarga 1.25 SHORAPUR 110

14 BPCL - - - 7.6

15 BPCL

- -

Dakshina

Kannada 9 Guruvanakere 110

16 BPCL - - - 12 MADHUVANAHALLY 220

17 BPCL - - Mysore 3 VAJAMANGALA 220

Page 210: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

196 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected substation

18 BPCL(Amoga Power) - - Hassan 1.5 KADAVINAKOTE 66

19 BPCL(Mandagere) - - Mandya 3.5 K R PET 66

20 Brindavan - - Shimoga 24 Gajanur 110

21

Brindavan Hydro Power Pvt. Ltd (Formerly Dandeli Steel & Ferro Alloys

Ltd.) - - - 1.5 Shimoga 110

22 CAVERY HYDRO - - Mandya 3 T K Halli 220

23 Energy Development Co. Ltd. - - Kodagu 6 C R PATNA 220

24

Gokak Power and Energy Limited (Formerly Gokak Textiles Ltd. (Gokak

Mills Division) - - Belgaum 0 Konnur 110

25

Gokak Power and Energy Limited (Formerly Gokak Textiles Ltd. (Gokak

Mills Division) - - Belgaum 0 Konnur 110

26

Gokak Power and Energy Limited (Formerly Gokak Textiles Ltd. (Gokak

Mills Division) - - Belgaum 4.5 Konnur 110

27 GRAPHITE - - Mandya 1.5 TUBINAKERE 220

28 GRAPHITE INDIA - - Mysore 18 KUSHALNAGARA 220

29 GVP Infra Projects Private Limited - - Udupi 15 Hiriyadaka 110

30 KALMALA

- - Raichur 0.4 Raichur 110

31 KARE POWER - - Raichur 24.7 Lingasugur 110

32 KEMPHOLE - - Hassan 18 HASAN 220

33 Khandaleru Power Pvt Ltd, (NCL Energy Ltd) - - Bellary 1.4 SANKALAPUR 110

34 KIRALA POWER - - Mandya 2 T K Halli 220

35 Kodagu Hydel - - Kodagu 3 KUSHALNAGARA 220

36 KPCL - - Mandya 17.2 T K Halli 220

37 KRISHNA HYDRO - - Yadgir 24.75 GURGUNTA 110

38 KRISHNA RIGHT BANK(SOMANAMARDI) - - Raichur 12 HATTI 110

39 LAXMI JALA VIDYUT - - Yadgir 24.75 GURGUNTA 110

40 LIMBAVALI - - Mandya 12 T K Halli 220

41 Lk power - - Mandya 2 TUBINAKERE 220

Page 211: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 197

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected substation

42 M/S CHEL Cauvery Hydro Energy Ltd(KAVERI) - - Mandya 4.5 K R PET 66

43 M/s Devar Power Ltd - - Udupi 3.8 Hiriyadaka 110

44 M/s Jasfer - - Bijapur 10.5 AFZALPUR 110

45 MARUTHI POWER - - Hassan 3 HASAN 220

46 MARUTHI POWER(Kabini) - - Mysore 5 Katkol 110

47 MASTER POWER(KALSON) - - Mysore 3 Katkol 110

48 MRUJJA MINI HYDEL - - Shimoga 0.75 Honnali 220

49 Murudeshwara Power Corporation Ltd., MPCL - - Bijapur 11.6 Muddebihal 110

50 Mysore Merchantile - - Hassan 3 HASAN 220

51 Nagarjuna Hydro - - Hassan 25.5 HASAN 220

52 Paschim Hydro Energy Pvt. Ltd. - - Hassan 9 HASAN 220

53 PIONEER GENCO

- - Mandya 24.75 T K Halli 220

54 PIONEER POWER

- -

Chamaraj

anagar 24.75 T K Halli 220

55 Pusala Power Projects Pvt. Ltd. - - Bellary 6 SIRAGUPPA 110

56 Rising Sun Power (P) Ltd.

- -

Ramanag

ar 2 Bidadi 220

57 SAGAR Dondole

- -

Dakshina

Kannada 13 Guruvanakere 110

58 SAGAR Neerukatte

- -

Dakshina

Kannada 15 Guruvanakere 110

59 Sai Spurthi Power Pvt. Ltd.,

- -

Ramanag

ar 10.25 Kanakapura 220

60 SANDUR - - - 37.5 Hosangadi 110

61 Sandur Manganese & Iron Ores Ltd. - - Hassan 8 HASAN 220

62 Saroj Energy Company Pvt. Ltd.

- -

Ramanag

ar 1.5 T K Halli 66

63 Sarovar Energy Pvt. Ltd. - - Raichur 1 DEODURGA 110

64 SHAMILLI - - Udupi 12 Hosangadi 110

Page 212: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

198 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Village Taluk District

Installed

capacity

in MW

Connected substation

65 SLS Power Industries Ltd - - Bellary 10 MUNIRABAD PH 110

66 SLS Power Industries Ltd.

- -

Chamaraj

anagar 6.25 MADHUVANAHALLY 220

67 Soham Renewable Energy India Pvt. Ltd.

- - Mandya 6 TUBINAKERE 220

68 SOHAM-MANNAPITLU

- -

Dakshina

Kannada 15 Soham Power

69 SRM (KALASA)

- -

Chikkam

agalore 6 CHIKAMAGALUR 220

70 SRS Energy Pvt. Ltd. - - Yadgir 10 SHAHAPUR 110

71 SUBHAS KABINI PCL - - Mysore 20 Katkol 110

72 Sugnaneshwara Hydel Power Pvt. Ltd., - - Yadgir 13.5 Khanapur MK 110

73

Trinetra

- -

Dakshina

Kannada 4.5 Guruvanakere 110

74 TRISHUL POWER - - Mandya 4 K R PET 66

75 Tungabhadra Power Co. Pvt. Ltd. - - Bellary 18 MUNIRABAD PH 110

76 TUNGABHADRA STEEL - - Belgaum 2.4 Saundatti 110

77 VENIKA GREEN POWER - - Mandya 0.75 TUBINAKERE 220

78 VIJAYALAKSHMI - - Mandya 1.75 T K Halli 220

79 YUKEN INDIA - - Mandya 0.35 TUBINAKERE 220

FY 2018-19

NIL

Page 213: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 199

Co-generation

Table 29: Details of proposed Co-generations for FY 18 and FY 19

# Developer Installed capacity in MW Connected substation

FY 2017-18

1 Athani farmers 24 Ainapur 110

2 KPR 30 Almel 110

3 SHIVASHAKTHI SUGARS 30.00 Ankali 110

4 RENUKA SUGARS 30 Athani_2 110

5 RENUKA SUGARS 37.20 Athani_2 110

6 KRISHNA SUGARS KSSKN 12 Athani_2 110

7 M/s Shri Sai Priya Sugars Ltd 50 Athani_2 110

8 M/s Belgaum Sugars 13 Belgaum 110

9 MAHATMA GANDHI SSK 13.00 BHALKI 110

10 Indian Sugars 19.5 Chadchan 110

11 DOODGANGA SUGARS 24.00 Chikkodi 110

12 SHAMNUR SUGARS 22 Davanagere 220

13 Davangere Sugars 24 Davanagere 220

14 BILAGI SUGARS 8.00 Giri sagar 110

15 KOLVI SUGARS (Gokak SC & ST Sahakari Sakkare Karkhane

Niyamita) 14.00 Gokak 110

16 GODAVARI SUGARS 44.00 Mahalingapura 110

17 PARRYS SUGAR(GMR) 24 Halyal 110

18 VISHWANATH SUGARS 14.00 Hukkeri 110

19 SATISH SUGARS 31.00 Hunsihal 110

20 NSSK 14.00 JANAWAD 110

21 South India Paper Mills Ltd. 7.8 Kadakola 220

22 BANNARI AMMAN SUGARS 36.00 Kadakola 220

23 GEM SUGARS 16.50 Katharki 110

24 UGAR SUGARS 15.00 KEMBHAVI 110

Page 214: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

200 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Installed capacity in MW Connected substation

25 CORAMANDEL SUGARS 12 K R PET 220

26 RYTARA SAHAKARI SAKKERE 12.50 Lokapur 110

27 BANNARI AMMAN SUGARS 20.00 MADHUVANAHALLY 220

28 NSL SUGARS 34.00 MADYAL 110

29 Sowbhagyalakshmi Sugars 18 Mamadapura 110

30 Shri Balaji Sugars & Chemicals Pvt.Ltd 17.00 Muddebihal 110

31 VIJAYANAGAR SUGAR 35.50 Mundargi 110

32 K Sugars 18 Neerbudihal 110

33 NIRANI 40.00 Manthur 110

34 Prabhulingeshwara 38.45 Jamakhandi 110

35 GMR SUGARS 1.00 Ramdurga 110

36 SADASHIVA SUGARS 16.00 Rampur 110

37 Basaveshwara Sugars 10 Saundatti 110

38 RENUKA SUGARS 38 Saundatti 110

39 RENUKA SUGARS(HAVALGA) 25.00 Ghattarga 110

40 VENKATESHWARA 15.00 Sadalga 110

41 HIRA SUGARS(KIRLOSKAR) 46.25 Sankeshwar 110

42 NANDI SAHAKARI 21.00 Shirbur 110

43 Manali Sugar Ltd. 15.00 Malghana (Sindagi Tq) 110

44 NSL SUGARS 28.00 SIRAGUPPA 110

45 CHAMUNDESHWARI SUGARS 26.00 T K Halli 220

46 JAMAKANDI SUGARS 29.80 Todalbagi 110

47 SCM SUGARS(NSL) 26.00 TUBINAKERE 220

48 Shiraguppi Sugars Works Pvt. Ltd. 6.00 UGAR 110

49 Shiraguppi Sugar Works Ltd. 14.00 UGAR 110

50 UGAR SUGARS(Chikkodi) 44.00 UGAR 110

51 INDIAN CANE POWER 28.00 Uttur 110

52 CORE Green sugars 24.00 WADAGERA 110

Page 215: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 201

# Developer Installed capacity in MW Connected substation

53 Shivasagar Sugar & Agro Products Ltd 18 Rampur 110

FY 2018-19

1 Athani farmers 24 Ainapur 110

2 BANNARI AMMAN SUGARS 36 Kadakola 220

3 BANNARI AMMAN SUGARS 20 MADHUVANAHALLY 220

4 Basaveshwara Sugars 20 Saundatti 110

5 BILAGI SUGARS 14 Giri sagar 110

6 CHAMUNDESHWARI SUGARS 26 T K Halli 220

7 CORAMANDEL SUGARS 30 K R PET 220

8 CORE Green sugars 24 WADAGERA 110

9 Davangere Sugars 24 Davanagere 220

10 DOODGANGA SUGARS 24 Chikkodi 110

11 GEM SUGARS 22.5 Katharki 110

12 GMR SUGARS 1 Ramdurga 110

13 GODAVARI SUGARS 62 Mahalingapura 110

14 HIRA SUGARS(KIRLOSKAR) 46 Sankeshwar 110

15 INDIAN CANE POWER 28 Uttur 110

16 Indian Sugars 19.5 Chadchan 110

17 JAMAKANDI SUGARS 57.3 Todalbagi 110

18 K Sugars 15 Neerbudihal 110

19 KOLVI SUGARS (Gokak SC & ST Sahakari Sakkare Karkhane

Niyamita) 14 Gokak 110

20 KPR 30 Almel 110

21 KRISHNA SUGARS KSSKN 12 Athani_2 110

22 M/s Belgaum Sugars 14 Belgaum 110

23 M/s Shri Sai Priya Sugars Ltd 50 Athani_2 110

24 MAHATMA GANDHI SSK 13 BHALKI 110

25 Manali Sugar Ltd. 15 Malghana (Sindagi Tq) 110

Page 216: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

202 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Installed capacity in MW Connected substation

26 NANDI SAHAKARI 21 Shirbur 110

27 NIRANI 72 Manthur 110

28 NSL SUGARS 34 MADYAL 110

29 NSL SUGARS 28 SIRAGUPPA 110

30 NSSK 14 JANAWAD 110

31 PARRYS SUGAR(GMR) 22 Halyal 110

32 Prabhulingeshwara 55.5 Jamakhandi 110

33 RENUKA SUGARS 30 Athani_2 110

34 RENUKA SUGARS 37.5 Athani_2 110

35 RENUKA SUGARS 38 Saundatti 110

36 RENUKA SUGARS(HAVALGA) 25 Ghattarga 110

37 RYTARA SAHAKARI SAKKERE 12.5 Lokapur 110

38 SADASHIVA SUGARS 16 Rampur 110

39 SATISH SUGARS 34 Hunsihal 110

40 SCM SUGARS(NSL) 40 TUBINAKERE 220

41 SHAMNUR SUGARS 22 Davanagere 220

42 Shiraguppi Sugar Works Ltd. 20.4 UGAR 110

43 Shiraguppi Sugars Works Pvt. Ltd. 6 UGAR 110

44 Shivasagar Sugar & Agro Products Ltd 18 Rampur 110

45 SHIVASHAKTHI SUGARS 35 Ankali 110

46 Shri Balaji Sugars & Chemicals Pvt.Ltd 18 Muddebihal 110

47 South India Paper Mills Ltd. 7.8 Kadakola 220

48 Sowbhagyalakshmi Sugars 18 Mamadapura 110

49 UGAR SUGARS 15 KEMBHAVI 110

50 UGAR SUGARS(Chikkodi) 44 UGAR 110

51 VENKATESHWARA 30 Sadalga 110

52 VIJAYANAGAR SUGAR 35.5 Mundargi 110

53 VISHWANATH SUGARS 14 Hukkeri 110

Page 217: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 203

# Developer Installed capacity in MW Connected substation

54 Parrys Sugar Industries Ltd. 31.5 Halyal 110

55 Shivashakthi Sugars Ltd. 15 Saundatti 220

56 Bhalakeshwar Sugars Ltd 14 BHALKI 110

57 Bidar Kissan Shakkar Karkhane Ltd 15 MANNA-E-KHELLI 110

58 Bilagi Sugar Mill Ltd. 16 Giri sagar 110

59 GM Sugars & Energy Limited 18 Haveri 110

60 Indian Cane Power Ltd. 55 Uttur 110

61 Shree Halasidhnath Sahakari Sakhar Kharkhana Ltd 15 Nippani 110

62 Shri Bhimashankar Shakari Sakkare Karkhane Niyamita 14 Zhalki 110

63 Soveregin Industries Limited 20 Terdal 110

64 Chamundeshwari Sugars Ltd. 18 C R PATNA 220

65 Chincholi Sugars & Bio

Industries Ltd. 26 CHINCHOLI 110

66 Koujalagi Sugars Ltd. 25 Gokak 110

67 Markandeya Co-Operative

Sugar Mill Pvt. Ltd. 14 Belgaum 110

68 Sangam Sahakari Sakkare

Karkhane Niyamita 14 H Hidakal 110

69 Sharada Sugars Pvt. Ltd. 12 Aski 110

70 Shree Renuka Sugars Ltd. 30 Ankali 110

Biomass generation

Table 30: Details of proposed biomass generations for FY 18 and FY 19

# Developer Installed capacity in MW Connected substation

FY 2017-18

1 Bhagyanagar Solvents & Extractions Pvt. Ltd. 6 Shaktinagar 110

2 Dharwad Bio Energy Pvt. Ltd. 10 PH Comp 110

Page 218: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

204 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Developer Installed capacity in MW Connected substation

3 FALCON TYRES 6 Hootagalli 220

4 Gujarat Ambuja Exports Ltd 2.85 Mundagod 110

5 Gujarat Ambuja Exports Ltd (Biomass based Cogen) 2.44 SAVANUR 110

6 Hassan Biomass Power Co. Pvt. Ltd. 8 HASAN 220

7 Haveri Bio Energy Pvt. Ltd. 10 Tiluvalli 110

8 INDRA POWER 6 GANGAVATHI 110

9 KOGANTI 7.5 KOGANTI 110

10 KONARK 6 ANSN HALLY 220

11 KOPPAL GREEN POWER 6 KARATAGI 110

12 MALAVALLI 4.5 VAJAMANGALA 220

13 Manchukonda Bio energy Pvt. Ltd 6 Raichur 220

14 Matrix Agro Pvt Ltd 6 CHINCHOLI 110

15 POWER ONICS 6 SIRAGUPPA 110

16 Raichur Bio Energies Pvt. Ltd. 9 Raichur 220

17 RAVI KIRAN 7.5 GANGAVATHI 110

18 RK POWER 20 Hiryur 220

19 SAMSON DISTILLERIES 2 Davanagere 220

2108-19

NIL

Page 219: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 205

Details of Proposed KPTCL Network Augmentations

Details of proposed KPTCL substation for FY 2017-18

Table 31: Details of proposed KPTCL substations for FY 18

Sl.No Substation name Zone District Taluk N/U

Voltage

level

(kV)

no of untis

Transformer

capacity

(MVA)

Total capacity (MVA)

Bagalkote Zone

1 Doni Bagalkote Gadag Mundaragi N 400/220 2 500 1000

2 Devaragennur Bagalkote Vijayapura Vijayapura N 110/11 2 10 20

3 Halaki Bagalkote Bagalkote Mudhol N 110/11 1 10 10

4 Hiremasali Bagalkote Bijapur Indi N 110/11 1 10 10

5 Khadakalat Bagalkote Belgaum Chikkodi N 110/11 2 10 20

6 Morab Bagalkote Belgaum Raibag N 110/11 2 10 20

7 Tolamatti (Anagawadi) Bagalkote Bagalkote Bilagi N 110/11 1 10 10

Page 220: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

206 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

Sl.No Substation name Zone District Taluk N/U

Voltage

level

(kV)

no of untis

Transformer

capacity

(MVA)

Total capacity (MVA)

Bengaluru Zone

1 Jigani Bengaluru Bengaluru urban Anekal N 220/66/11 2 150 300

2 Kothipura (Ramanagara) Bengaluru Ramanagara Ramanagara N 220/66 2 100 200

3 Mittemari Bengaluru Chikkaballapura Bagepalli N 220/66/11 2 100 200

4 Magadi Bengaluru Ramanagara Magadi N 220/66 2 100 200

Hassan Zone

1 Belagumba Hassan Hassan Arasikere N 110/11 2 10 20

2 Karkala Hassan Udupi Karkala N 110/11 2 10 20

3 Hosanagara Hassan Shivamogga Hosanagara U 110/11 2 10 20

Gulbarga Zone

1 Ghattarga Gulbarga Gulbarga Afzalpur N 110/11 2 10 20

2 Mallat (Manvi) Gulbarga Raichur Manvi N 220/110 2 100 200

Page 221: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 207

Sl.No Substation name Zone District Taluk N/U

Voltage

level

(kV)

no of untis

Transformer

capacity

(MVA)

Total capacity (MVA)

3 Muddapura Gulbarga Raichur Sindhanur N 110/11 1 10 10

4 Yeragera Gulbarga Raichur Raichur N 110/11 2 10 20

Mysore Zone

NIL

Tumkur Zone

1 Pavagada Tumkur Tumkur Pavagada N 220/66 2 100 200

Details of proposed KPTCL substation for FY 2018-19

Table 32: Details of proposed KPTCL substations for FY 19

Sl.No Substation name Zone District Taluk N/U

Voltage

level

(kV)

no of untis

Transformer

capacity

(MVA)

Total capacity (MVA)

Bagalkote Zone

1 Hebballi Bagalkote Bagalkote Badami N 110/11 1 10 10

2 Talikote Bagalkote Bijapur Muddebihal U 110/11 2 10 20

3 Khedagi cross

(Rodagi) Bagalkote Bijapur Indi N 110/11 1 10 10

4 Garag (Shedabal) Bagalkote Dharwad Dharwad N 110/11 2 10 20

5 Belavanaki Bagalkote Gadag Ron N 110/11 1 10 10

Page 222: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

208 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

Sl.No Substation name Zone District Taluk N/U

Voltage

level

(kV)

no of untis

Transformer

capacity

(MVA)

Total capacity (MVA)

Bengaluru Zone

1 T.Gollahalli

(Thimmasandra) Bengaluru Kolar Bangarpet U 220/66/11 2 100 200

2 Koramangala Bengaluru Bengaluru urban Bengaluru south N 220/66/11 2 150 300

3 ITI Bengaluru Bengaluru urban Bengaluru east N 220/66 2 150 300

Gulbarga Zone

1 Ramasamudra Gulbarga Yadgir Yadgir N 220/110 2 100 200

2 Yaapaldinni Gulbarga Raichur Raichur U 110/11 2 10 20

3 Yeradona Gulbarga Koppal Gangavathi N 110/11 1 10 10

Page 223: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 209

Sl.No Substation name Zone District Taluk N/U

Voltage

level

(kV)

no of untis

Transformer

capacity

(MVA)

Total capacity (MVA)

4 Thavaragera Gulbarga Koppal Kustagi U

110/33 1 20 20

110/11 1 10 10

5 Bennur Gulbarga Koppal Gangavathi N 110/11 1 10 10

Hassan Zone

1 Mulki Hassan Dakshina

kannada Mangalore U 110/11 1 10 10

2 Madavu Hassan Dakshina

kannada Puttur N

110/33 2 20 40

110/11 1 10 10

Mysore Zone

NIL

TumkurZone

1 Benkikere (Channagiri) Tumkur Davanagere Channagiri N 220/66 2 100 200

Details of proposed KPTCL transmission lines for FY 2017-18

Table 33: Details of proposed KPTCL transmission lines for FY 18

Voltage level

(kV) From SS To SS No of circuits

Line route

length (km)

LILO route

length (km) Conductor type

Bagalkote Zone

400 Doni Guddadahalli 1 56 26.798

Twin Moose ACSR

400 Doni Guttur 1 118 Twin Moose ACSR

220 Doni Gadag 2 22.77, 20.22

2.775

Drake

220 Doni Lingapur 1 79.77 Drake

220 Doni Lingapur Tap-1 1 77.77 Drake

110 Devaragennur Shirabur Tap-1 1 3 - Lynx

Page 224: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

210 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

Voltage level

(kV) From SS To SS No of circuits

Line route

length (km)

LILO route

length (km) Conductor type

110 Shirabur Shirabur Tap-1 1 11.9 Lynx

110 Mamadapura Shirabur Tap-1 1 5 Lynx

110 Halaki Jambagi K.D 1 13.5 - Lynx

110 Hiremasali Indi Tap-1 1 8

-

Lynx

110 Indi Indi Tap-1 1 15 Lynx

110 Devarahipparagi Indi Tap-1 1 28 Lynx

110 Khadakalat Chikkodi 1 13 5

Lynx

110 Khadakalat Nippani 1 15 Lynx

110 Morab 220kV Kudachi 1 8.5 - Lynx

110 Tolamatti (Anagawadi) Tolamatti Tap-1 1 8.5

-

Lynx

110 Shiraguppi Tolamatti Tap-1 1 8.5 Lynx

110 Bilagi Tolamatti Tap-1 1 7.5 Lynx

Bengaluru Zone

220 Jigani Somanahalli 1 45 -

Drake

220 Jigani Yerandanahalli 1 10 Drake

220 Kothipura (Ramanagara) Bidadi 2 18.12 - Drake

220 Mittemari Gowribidnur 2 45.5 - Drake

220 Magadi Bidadi 2 32

-

Drake

220 Magadi Anchepalya 1 45 Drake

220 Magadi Nelamangla 1 40 Drake

Hassan Zone

110 Belagumba Kadur Tap 6 1 0.15

-

Lynx

110 Arasikere Kadur Tap 6 1 0.1 Lynx

110 Kadur Tap 7 Kadur Tap 6 1 9 Lynx

110 Kadur Tap 5 Kadur Tap 6 1 0.9 Lynx

110 Karkala Kemar 1 1.1 1.1

Moose

110 Karkala Hiriyadka 1 20 Moose

110 Hosanagara Ripponpet 1 30 - Lynx

Gulbarga Zone

Page 225: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 211

Voltage level

(kV) From SS To SS No of circuits

Line route

length (km)

LILO route

length (km) Conductor type

400 Yermarus TPS Bellary PS 2 142.5 - Quad moose

400 JSW TPS Bellary PS 2 10 - Quad moose

220 Mallat Mallat Tap_1 1 2.14 - Drake

220 Lingasugur Mallat Tap_1 1 39.6 - Drake

220 RTPS Mallat Tap_1 1 46 - Drake

110 Ghattarga Renuka sugars D 1 2 - Lynx

110 Mallat Sirwar 1 15 Lynx

110 Muddapura Sindhanur 1 19.64 -

Lynx

110 Muddapura Maski 1 10 Lynx

110 Yeragera Muliyabad 1 20 - Lynx

Mysore Zone

NIL

Tumkur Zone

220 Pavagada Madhugiri 2 60 - Drake

220 Vasanthanarasapura Antharasanahally 2 18.5 - Drake

220 Vasanthanarasapura Madhugiri 2 44.5 - Drake

Details of proposed KPTCL transmission lines for FY 2018-19

Table 34: Details of proposed KPTCL transmission lines for FY 19

Voltage level

(kV) From SS To SS No of circuits

Line route

length (km)

LILO route

length (km) Conductor type

Bagalkote Zone

220 Kudgi STPP Vajramatti 2 79.42 - Drake

220 Bijapur 220 kV Kumatagi 2 23.897 - Drake

110 Mahalingapur 220 kV SS Jamakhandi 2 17 - Lynx

Page 226: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

212 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

Voltage level

(kV) From SS To SS No of circuits

Line route

length (km)

LILO route

length (km) Conductor type

110

Hebballi Hebballi Tap-1 1 14.188 - Lynx

Bidnal Hebballi Tap-1 1 19 - Lynx

Navalgunda Hebballi Tap-1 1 16 - Lynx

110 Talikote Aski 1 17.557 - Lynx

110 Khedagi cross Hirebevanur 1 10.969 - Lynx

110

Garag Kittur 1 23.37

4.598 Lynx Garag Narendra 1 16.21

110 Belavanki Ron 1 22.27 - Lynx

Bengaluru Zone

220 T.Gollahalli (Thimmasandra) Kolar HVDC 2 27.269 - Drake

220 Koramangala NIMHANS 1 5.5

- 1000 sq.mm single core XLPE

copper UG cable Koramangala HSR layout 1 8.5

220

ITI Hoody 1 4.5

- 1000 sq.mm single core XLPE

UG cable Hebbal ITI 1 23

Gulbarga Zone

220 Ramasamudra RTPS 2 53.18

1.82 Drake Ramasamudra Sedam 2 53.15

110

Ramasamudra Yadgir 1 17.45 6.835 Lynx

Ramasamudra Konkal 1 29.18

Ramasamudra Saidapur k 1 24.207 - Lynx

110

Yaapaldinni Yaapaldinni Tap-1 1 11.15

- - Chiksugur Yaapaldinni Tap-1 1 9.14

Vadavatti Yaapaldinni Tap-1 1 5.86

Page 227: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 213

Voltage level

(kV) From SS To SS No of circuits

Line route

length (km)

LILO route

length (km) Conductor type

110

Yeradona Yaradona Tap-1 1 4.96

- Patridge Karatagi Tap-1 Yaradona Tap-1 1 9

Sriramnagar Yaradona Tap-1 1 12

110 Thavaragera Kushtagi 1 26.495 - -

110 Bennur Yeradona 1 8.647 - -

Hassan Zone

110 Mulki Nandikur 1 11 - -

110 Madavu Puttur 1 27 - -

Mysore Zone

NIL

Tumkur Zone

220 Benkikere Honnali 2 47.439 - -

Details of proposed KPTCL transformer augmentations

Table 35: Details of proposed KPTCL transformer augmentations for FY 18 and FY 19

# Substation name Zone District Voltage

level (kV)

Existing

transformation

capacity (MVA)

Proposed

augmentation

capacity (MVA)

Final

transformation

capacity

(MVA)

Final total transformation

capacity (MVA)

FY 2017-18

Bagalkote zone

NIL

Page 228: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

214 www.cstep.in © CSTEP

# Substation name Zone District Voltage

level (kV)

Existing

transformation

capacity (MVA)

Proposed

augmentation

capacity (MVA)

Final

transformation

capacity

(MVA)

Final total transformation

capacity (MVA)

Bengaluru zone

1 Chintamani Bengaluru Chikkaballapur 220/66 2×100 100 3x100 300

Gulbarga zone

NIL

Hassan zone

NIL

Mysore

NIL

Tumkur zone

NIL

FY 2018-19

Bagalkote zone

1 Kudachi 220/110/11 Bagalkote Belgaum 110/11 2×10 10 3×10 30

2 Nehru nagar Bagalkote Belgaum 110/33 2×20 - 2×20 40

110/11 2×10 20 2×20 40

3 Indi 220/110/11 Bagalkote Bijapur 110/11 1×10 10 2×10 20

4 Hangal Bagalkote Haveri 110/33 2×20+1×10 - 2×20+1×10 50

110/11 1×10 10 2×10 20

5 Banahatti Bagalkote Bagalkote 110/11 2×10 10 1×20+1×10 30

6 Shirabur Bagalkote Bijapur 110/11 2×10 10 1×20+1×10 30

7 Zhalki Bagalkote Bijapur 110/33 1×20+1×10 - 1×20+1×10 30

110/11 2×10 10 1×20+1×10 30

Bengaluru zone

NIL

Gulbarga zone

Page 229: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 215

# Substation name Zone District Voltage

level (kV)

Existing

transformation

capacity (MVA)

Proposed

augmentation

capacity (MVA)

Final

transformation

capacity

(MVA)

Final total transformation

capacity (MVA)

1 Lingasugur Gulbarga Raichur 220/110 1×100 1×100 2×100 200

2 Ananthpur road

(Bisilahalli) Gulbarga Bellary

110/11 2×10 - 2×10 20

110/33 - 20 1×20 20

3 Konkal Gulbarga Yadgiri 110/33 1×20 - 1×20 20

110/11 1×10 10 2×10 20

4 Chincholi Gulbarga Gulbarga 110/33 1×20 10 1×20+1×10 30

110/11 1×10 - 1×10 10

Hassan zone

1 Netlamadnur Hassan Dakshina kannada 110/33 1×20 20 2×20 40

110/11 1×10 - 1×10 10

2 Salethur Hassan Dakshina kannada 110/11 1×10 10 2×10 20

3 Bantwala Hassan Dakshina kannada 110/33 1×10 30 2×20 40

110/11 2×20 - 2×20 40

4 Madhuvana Hassan Udupi 110/11 1×20 10 1×20+1×10 30

5 Kallusadarahally Hassan Hassan 110/11 1×10 10 2×10 20

6 Gurupura Hassan Dakshina kannada 110/11 2×10 10 1×20+1×10 30

Mysore

NIL

Tumkur zone

1 Halukurke Tumkur Tumkur 110/11 1×10 10 2×10 20

2 K B cross Tumkur Tumkur 220/110 2×100 100 3×100 300

Page 230: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 216

Details of Proposed PGCIL Network Augmentations

Details of proposed PGCIL substations for FY 2017-18

Table 36: Details of proposed PGCIL substation for FY 18

# Substation name Voltage

level (kV)

Number of

units

Transformer capacity

(MVA) Total capacity (MVA)

1 Kothipura

(Ramanagara) 220/66 2 100 200

2 Magadi 220/66 2 100 200

3 Chintamani

Augmnt. 220/66 1 100 100

4 Pooling station at

Tumkur(Pavagada) 400/220 1 500 500

5

Pooling station at

Tumkur(Pavagada)

Augmentation

400/220 2 500 1000

6 Mallat (Manvi) 220/66 2 100 200

7 Mittemari 220/66 2 100 200

Details of proposed PGCIL transmission lines for FY 2017-18

Table 37: Details of proposed PGCIL transmission lines for FY 18

Sl

No From Substation To Substation

Voltage

level

(kV)

No of circuits Line route

length (km)

Conductor

type

1 Gooty Pavagada PS 400 2 130 Twin Moose

2 Tumkur

(Vasantnarsapur) Pavagada PS 400 2 80.5 Twin Moose

3 Hiriyur Bastipur

(Mysore) 400 1 206 Quad Moose

4 Pavagada PS Bastipur

(Mysore) 400 1 315 Quad Moose

5 Bellary PS Pavagada PS 400 2 260 Quad Moose

6 Pavagada PS Tumkur

(Vasantnarsapur) 400 2 185 Quad Moose

7 JSW TPS Bellary (PS) 400 2 10 Quad Moose

8 Bellary (PS) New Madhugiri

(near tumkur) 400 2 225 Quad Moose

9 Yermarus TPS Bellary Pooling

Station 400 2 142.5 Quad Moose

10 Bidadi Magadi 220 2 32 Drake

11 Tumkur

(Vasantnarsapur) Antharasanahally 220 2 18.5 Drake

12 Vasanthanarasapura Madhugiri 220 2 44.5 Drake

13 RTPS Mallat (Manvi) 220 1 46 Drake

14 Lingasugur Mallat (Manvi) 220 1 39.6 Drake

15 Madhugiri Pavagada 220 2 60 Drake

16 B Bagewadi Kudgi 220 2 39.22 Drake

17 Bijapur Kudgi 220 2 36.22 Drake

Page 231: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 217

Details of proposed PGCIL substations for FY 2018-19

Table 38: Details of proposed PGCIL substation for FY 19

Details of proposed PGCIL transmission lines for FY 2018-19

Table 39: Details of proposed PGCIL transmission lines for FY 19

# From Substation To Substation

Voltage

level

(kV)

No of circuits

Line

route

length

(km)

Conductor type

1 Vasantanarasapura Salem 765 1 219 Quad Bersimis

2 Vasantanarasapura Salem PS 765 1 245 Quad Bersimis

3 Yelahanka Hoodi 400 1 86.2 Twin Moose

4 Yelahanka Nelamangala 400 1 27.54 Twin Moose

5 Jagalur BTPS Pool 400 400 2 90 Quad Moose

6 Pavagada PS Hiriyur 400 1 109 Quad Moose

7 Yelahanka Madhugiri 400 2 66 Quad Moose

8 Somanahalli Dharmapuri (Salem new) 400 2 122 Quad Moose

9 Jagalur Kudligi 220 2 48 Drake

10 Kudligi Ittagi 220 2 33 Drake

11 BIAL Begur Devanahalli HP 220 1 5 Drake

12 Devanahalli HP Hoskote 220 1 15 Drake

13 Kudgi UMPP NTPC Vajramati 220 2 79.5 Drake

14 Yelahanka PGCIL Yelahanka KPTCL 220 2 5 1000 Sq.mm XLPE

15 Yelahanka PGCIL BIAL 220 2 15 Drake

16 Jagalur Chitradurga 220 2 35.5 Drake

17 Jagalur Thallak 220 2 90 Drake

# Substation name Voltage

level (kV) No of units

Transformer

capacity (MVA)

Total

capacity

(MVA)

1 Yelahanka 400/220 2 500 1000

2 Pavagada PS 400/220 2 500 1000

3 500 1500

3 Vasantanarasapura 400/220 1 500 500

4 Jagalur 400/220 2 500 1000

4 Kudligi 220/66 2 100 200

6 Devanahalli HP 220/66 2 100 200

Page 232: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

www.cstep.in © CSTEP 218

Details of proposed reactors

Table 40: Details of proposed reactors in KPTCL grid for FY 18 and FY 19

Sl No Connected substation/line Voltage level

(kV)

Rating in

Mvar

Switchable/Non

Switchable

FY 2017-18

Bus reactor

NIL

Line reactor

1 Kudgi to Tumkur line 1 at both

Kudgi and Tumkur end 400 2×80 Switchable

2 Kudgi to Tumkur line 2 at both

Kudgi and Tumkur end 400 2×80 Switchable

FY 2018-19

Bus reactor

1 Pavagada PS 400 2×125 -

2 Davanagere 400 1×125 -

3 Talaguppa 400 1×125 -

Line reactor

1 Hiriyur to Mysore line 1 at

Hiriyur end 400 1×80 -

2 Hiriyur to Mysore line 2 at

Hiriyur end 400 1×80 -

Annexure IV – CGS Share Allocation and Transmission System

Asset Cost Data

Details of CGS Share Allocation for Karnataka

Table 41: Details of CGS share allocation for Karnataka

Sl. No CGS Stations

Installed

Capacity

(MW)

Karnataka State

ESCOMs firm Share

(MW)

Share from CGS plants located within Karnataka for FY 2017-18

1 Kaiga APS U#1 & 2 440 108

2 Kaiga APS U#3 & 4 440 119

3 Kudgi Unit-1 800 400

4 Kudgi Unit-2 800 400

5 Kudgi Unit-3 800 400

Share from CGS plants located outside Karnataka for FY 2017-18

1 Ramagundam St. I &II 2100 345

2 Ramagundam St.III 500 87

3 Talcher St.II 2000 350

4 Simhadri STPS ST.II U#1,2 1000 176

5 NLC TPS II St.I 630 84

Page 233: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center

Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning

© CSTEP www.cstep.in 219

Sl. No CGS Stations

Installed

Capacity

(MW)

Karnataka State

ESCOMs firm Share

(MW)

6 NLC TPS-II St.II 840 115

7 NLC TPS-I Exp. 420 92

8 NLC TPS-II Exp. U#1,2 500 110

9 Vallur STPS U#1,2 & 3 1500 112

10 NTPL Tuticorin U#1,2 1000 158

11 Madras APS 440 29

12 Kudnakulam NPP U#1&2 2000 442

13 Kalpakam PFBR - 500 MW 17% 84.4

14 NVVN Coal power for bundling

with Solar power (under JNNSM) 70

15 Power Procurement under long term

(CGS from DVC) 450 450

16 T B dam 14

17 Jurala 117

Total state share by 2017-18 4262.4

Additional Share from CGS plants located outside Karnataka for FY 2018-19

1 NLC New TPP-U#1 and U#2

(2X500) 7% 71

Total state share by 2018-19 4333.4

Transmission System Asset Cost Data

Table 42: Transmission system asset cost data considered in this study

# Particulars Cost (INR crore)

1 110 kV S/C Lynx 0.31

2 110 kV D/C Lynx 0.45

3 220 kV D/C Drake 0.65

4 220 kV S/C Drake 0.71

5 220 kV XLPE 1000 sq,mm D/C UG Cable 23

6 220/66 kV, 100 MVA Transformer along with terminal bays 9

7 220/110 kV, 100 MVA Transformer along with terminal bays 8.5

8 220/66 kV, 2×100 MVA Substation 41

9 220/110 kV, 2×100 MVA Substation 41

10 110 kV transmission line Bay 0.4

11 220 kV transmission line Bay 1.5

Page 234: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center
Page 235: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center
Page 236: Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning · 2020. 3. 7. · Karnataka’s Energy Mix: Computational Model for Energy Planning Final Report Submitted by: Center