June 17, 2014...June 17, 2014 Mr. Mark Dimondstein President American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO...

June 17, 2014

Mr. Mark Dimondstein President American Postal Workers

Union, AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20005-4128

Dear Mark:

Certified Mail Tracking Number: 7013 3020 0002 3616 5892

As information, enclosed is a copy of the First Post Implementation Review for Lufkin, Texas, Customer Service Mail Processing Center (CSMPC), Area Mail Processing (AMP).

In accordance with the Non-disclosure Agreement February 11, 2013 the Postal Service is providing both redacted and unredacted copies of the PIR.

If there are any questions, please contact Rickey Dean at extension 7 412.

Sincerely,

Patrick M. Devine Manager Contract Administration (APWU)

Enclosures

(CA2014-484)

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating Facility Name & Type: Lufkin TX CSMPC

Street Address: 800 S John Redditt Dr City: Lufkin

State: TX 50 Facility ZIP Code: 75904

District: Dallas Area: Southern

Finance Number: 485410 Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 759

Miles to Gaining Facility: 107.4 EXFC office: Yes

Plant Manager: Robert Austin Jr. Senior Plant Manager: Larry Wagener

District Manager: David W. Camp

Facility Name & Type: North Houston P&DC Street Address: 4600 Aldine Bender Road

City: Houston State: TX

50 Facility ZIP Code: 77315 District: Houston

Area: Southern Finance Number: 484143

Current 30 ZIP Code(s): 773, 774, 775 EXFC office: Yes

Plant Manager: Juan Gonzalez (A) Senior Plant Manager: Juan Gonzalez (A)

District Manager: William J. Mitchell

Approval Date: March 1, 2013 Implementation Date: Jul-01-2013

PIR Type: 1st PIR

REDACTED

Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2013: Dec-31-2013 Processing Days per Year: 310

Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,746 EAS Hours per Year: 1,820

Date of DAR Factors/Cost of Borrowing/

New Facility Start-up Costs Update January 0, 1900

Date & Time this workbook was last saved:

Area Vice President: JoAnn Feindt Vice President, Network Operations: David E Williams

Area AMP Coordinator: Steve Jackson NAI Contact: Sarah Grover

05-30-2014 08:16

PIR Data Entry Page

Signatures

LO$ing FacUlty Name and Typs!: IF Co®:

F'IMm:e Number: Curmnt SCf ZIP Codll'l(s):

facitlty Name and Type: ZIP Code:

Finance Number: Cumnt SCF IF Ce<1ef\ll>):

07/0111 PIR

.Date of Data: Jul-01-2013 to

AB!M~ AI'H Vice Pr•ident:

Executive Summary Last Saved: May 30, 2014 Date Range of Data·

Losing Facility Name and Type: Street Address:

City:

State: Current SCF ZIP Code(s):

Type of Distribution Consolidated:

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Street Address:

City:

Savings/Costs

Staffing

Service

Function 1 Workhour Savings

Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings (less Maint!Trans)

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings

Transportation Savings

Maintenance Savings

Space Savings

Total Annual Savings

Total One-Time Costs

Total First Year Savings

Craft Position Loss

PCES/EAS Position Loss

FCM Service Performance (EXFC & PFCM 0/N)

FCM Service Performance (EXFC & PFCM 2 Day)

FCM Service Performance (EXFC & PFCM 3 Day)

Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Residential at PFC level

Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Small Business at PFC level

Destinating

North Houston P&DC 4600 Aldine Bender Road

1st PIR vs Pre AMP 1st PIR vs Approved

($772,407) ($1,422,745)

$0 $19,1

Losing Current Qtr Gaining Current Qtr

97.18% 96.48%

95.69% 97.19%

91.32% 90.09%

0.00%

PIR Type: 1st PIR Jul-01-2013 - Dec-31-2013

from Workhour Costs - Combined

from Other Curr vs Prop

from Other Curr vs Prop

from Transportation HCR and Transportation PVS

from Maintenance

from Space Evaluation and Other Costs

from Space Evaluation and Other Costs

from Staffing-Graff

from Stafflng-PCESIEAS

from Service Performance & CSM





PIR Executive Summary

Calculation References Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data: PreAMP Proposed 1st PIR

Function 1 Workhour Costs $56,087,113 $54,682,404 $63,634,781 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs

$8,199,626 $8,199,626 $7,569,984 {less Maintenance & Transportation)

PCES/EAS Workhour Costs $6,506,546 $6,015,326 $6,632,128 Transportation Costs $2,038,221 $2,233,796 $2,072,203

Maintenance Costs $18,822,051 $18,171,712 $19,594,457 Space Savings $0 $0 $0

Total Annual Cost $91 ,653,557 $89,302,865 $99,503,553

Total One-Time Costs 20 $0

Total First Year Costs $91 ,653,557 $89,321,985 $99,503,553

Staffing

Craft Position Total On-Rolls 1,069 1,042 1,259 PCES/EAS Position Total On-Rolls 56 66 58

1st PIR vs Proposed 1st PIR vs Pre-AMP {A~~roved} AMP Approved AMP

Function 1 Workhour Savings ($7,547,668) ($8,952,377) $1,404,709 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings $629,642 $629,642 $0 (less MainUT rans)

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings ($125,582) ($616,801) $491,220 Transportation Savings ($33,982) $161,594 ($1

Maintenance Savings ($772,407) ($1 ,422,745) $650,339 Space Savings $0 $0 $0

Total Annual Savings ($7,849,997) ($10,200,689) $2,350,692

Total One-Time Costs $0 $19,120 ($19,120)

Total First Year Savings ($7,849,997) $2,331,572

Staffing Craft Position Loss (190) (217) 27

PCES/EAS Position Loss (2) 8 (i 0)

PIR Executive Summary

Summary Narrative

Losing Facility Name and Type: Current SCF ZIP Code(s):

Type of Distribution Consolidated:

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Current SCF ZIP Code s):

Background:

Last Saved: May 30, 2014

Lufkin TX CSMPC 759 Destinating

North Houston P&DC 773, 774, 775

This is the First Post Implementation Review (PIR) of the consolidation of Lufkin Texas CSMPC mail volumes from the Lufkin Texas CSMPC (759) into the NHO P&DC (SCF 773-775). The AMP study called for the consolidation of Destinating mail volumes into NHO P&DC due to the overall decline in volumes and to increase efficiency. Under the AMP for delivery to Lufkin, Lufkin CSMPC serve as the HUB for all (SCF 759) Associate Offices. Function 2, 3A, 3B, and 8 remained the facility, and was transferred to the Post office finance number 485410. Lufkin Texas CSMPC is approximately 107.4 miles from the North Houston P&DC.

Financial Summary:

The baseline data for this PIR was taken from the period of June 1, 2013- December 31, 2013. This 6-month period was annualized to represent a full year for the first PIR. Financial savings for the consolidation from the Lufkin Texas CSMPC into the NHO P&DC were:

Total First Year Savings Total Annual Savings One time cost

Allotted Funds: Original1x costs Deviation #1

Explanation of Work hour Adjustments

$(7.849,997) $(7 849,997) $ 19,120

$0 $ 19,120

1) Work Hour costs from Houston Outgoing mail move into North Houston were included in the total work hours for the gaining facility. These additional work hours total $6,612,698 and are not related to the Lufkin Destinating AMP.

2) Work hour costs from the Bryan Destinating Funtion 1 of$928,526 and Maintenance costs of $1,126,036.

Adjusting for the impacts, which total $8,667,260, the adjusted first year savings is $817,263, which did not meet the expectations of the approved AMP of $2,331,572

Other Concurrent lnnitiatives: Two additional consolidations were approved into the North Houston P&DC. Those sites were implemented on the following schedule:

Facility Houston AMP (Ougtoing portion) Bryan Destinating AMP

Customer & Service Impacts:

Effective Date May, 2013

June,2013

There were, no service standard changes made for SCF 759.

The BMEU, Box Section, and Retail Unit located at the Lufkin CSMPC were not affected. The postmark used for Lufkin CSMPC is "773."

PIR Summary Narrative

Transportation:

Lufkin CSMPC is 2.5 hours travel time from the North Houston P&DC. Under the AMP for delivery to Lufkin, the Lufkin Post Office serves as the HUB for all (SCF 759) Associate Offices, with the exception of Jasper, Texas and Woodville, Texas. Jasper, Texas and Woodville, Texas offices transport all collection mail directly to the North Houston P&DC facility.

HCR:

HCR Trips 75743 and 75910 for the losing location (Lufkin CSMPC) were eliminated. Trip 7590 was replaced by 75985

HCR Trip 75194 mileage estimates Pre-AMP were significantly higher (723229) than 151 PIR Annual Mileage for the losing location (Lufkin CSMPC).

Staffing Impacts:

Mail processing staffing impacts for the 1st PIR resulted in loss of 18 craft positions for Lufkin CSMPC. FTR Craft positions at North Houston P&DC is 200 positions above the PIR proposed Craft positions. (Includes Non-Career)

EAS positions resulted in a net difference of (6) employees to Pre-AMP On-rolls. Lufkin CSMPC is one position below their proposed. North Houston P&DC has five EAS positions difference to Pre-AMP Onrolls.

1 Craft = Career + Non-career

Note: Lufkin's craft positions are F4. There are no SDO, however there are 2 (two) Customer Service Supervisors and 1 (one) Postmaster.


Maintenance Impacts:

During the 151 PIR timeframe, the overall Maintenance Savings for the First PIR was $($772,407)

Many items come into play when calculating this savings.

1. When the Originating and Destinating volumes moved to North Houston P&DC in June, 2013, Lufkin CSMPC maintenance was transferred to the post office finance number (485410).

2. North Houston P&DC utilized local maintenance to perform the mail processing equipment moves (detailed in the next section.) These costs $(19120) were planned for under the one-time costs; not in the maintenance section of the AMP.

MPE moves: In order to prepare for the Lufkin CSMPC Originating and Destinating volumes numerous equipment shifts were performed on the North Houston P&DC workroom floor and the Houston North Annex -DOC. The equipment moves were performed by local maintenance and shipped by PVS transportation.

The 2 DBCS machines were relocated from the work room floor at Lufkin CSMPC and moved to Houston North Annex- DOC.

All of the machine relocation costs were allocated for in the Lufkin CSMPC Originating and Destinating AMP into North Houston P&DC.

Space:

Retail, PO Box, Caller Services, and Delivery units are included in a separate Node Study.

Carriers from Lufkin CSMPC office have moved into the Lufkin Post Main Post Office .


Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement Last Saved: May 30, 2014

Losing Facility: Lufkin TX CSMPC District: Dallas

PIR Type: Implementation Date:

1st PIR 07/01/13

---------------------------------

Gaining Facility: North Houston P&DC District: Houston

After AMP

(15) Notes: ____________________ _

Ar',.••~m•><Satisfaction Measurement (CSM) became Customer Experience Measureme Data reflects most recently completed quarter available in CEM.

··~ .... ,, ... , ..... , .............. +········"·~······ .. ········!Overall Satisfaction (Overall Experience)

., ........ , .......... , ....•.••••••• +································· .. ···, ............ 1satisfaction with Receiving (Experience with receiving)

.... , .............................. +···· .................................... 1satisfaction with Sending (Experience with sending)

.................................... + ........................................ 1satisfaction with most frequently visited PO (Experience with most frequently visited PC

,..................................... 1satisfaction with most recent contact with USPS (Experience with most recent contact v

'---.....::::.:..::L--'-------'---------'Likely to recommend the USPS

PIR Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement

PIR Workhour Costs ~ Combined Facilities

[ Combined Facilities I

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Oestinating

Workhour Costs. Combined Facilities Last Saved: May 30, 2014

PIR Type•: ~:;;;a"'\:'-',1"':P;,I"'R-col7u-m-ns~i-s -.n-nu-~""iz-ed~f~O<~F~i<st PJR

Date Range of Data: Jui..01~2013 to Oec-31~2013

PIR Workhour Costs - Combined F acHities

PlR Workhour Costs- Combined Facilities

PIR Workhour Costs· Combined Facilities

I (1) 3 4 • 9 10 12 13 1 1 16

Annual FHP Volume Annual TPH or NATPH Volume Annual Workhours Annual Productivity Annual Workhour Costs

Operation ·'f't<IA5t". .,_

1stPIR ·~AI-'"•······ Pr- 1st PIR •'< .• ~~< - 1stPIR ·.~Mtp Proposed 1stPIR l~>t.~!'

.,_ 1stPIR

Numbers

Change (17) (18) Change (19) (20) Change {21) {22) Change (23) (24) Change (25) (26)

Analysis 1st?IR vsP~AMP 1st PfR vs Propos~ Anafysis ist ?!R vs Pre AMP 1st ?IR vs Proposed Analysis is! PiR vs PrE- AMP 1.$1 PIR vs Proposed Analysts 1sl PIR vs PreAMP 1st PfR vs Proposed Analysis 1st PIR vs PrE AMP 1st PlR n Proposed

Units 167' 184,189 167' 184.189 Units 741,692,828 741,692,828 Unfts 271.874 30:$,029 Units (101) {18&) Units $7 ,547<6&8 $8,952.377

Percent 10.1% 10.1% Percent I 16.7% 16.7% Percent .2iM% 2:3.4% Percent -3,0% ~5.5% Percent 13.5% 16:.4%

(27)NOTES: ===============================================================================-------------------------------------------------------------------------fi¥1!4120011

PIR Workhour Costs- Combined Facilities

losing Facility: Lufkin TX CSMPC

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating

Workhour Costs • Losing Facility Last Saved: May 30, 2014

PIR Type": -'!,_!!'stc:P:!!~~PI~R -,"""""'~-,~, m--~.-!o<~R~-, PIR.

Date Range of Data: ~ to Oec-31-2.013

PfR Workhour Costs ~ Losing

PIR Workhour Costs- Losing

PIR Work:hour Costs - Losing

Gaining Facility: North Houston P&DC

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Oestinating

Workhour Costs • Gaining Facility Last Saved: May 30, 2014

.. .. .. . . . . 11 $41.73 41

12 ~===~$4~1.~64~ 42 . ., ....... $37.52 43 $39.50 44

"' "" 47 ..

PIR Type•: 7.~~S~'-':-'-~:'CP"'1Rc:-c-o1,-u_m_ns-,-is-a-nn-u-calc-ized--c-7fo-,""Fi"t PIR

Date Range of Data: Jui..Q1-2013 to Qec..31-2013

r· ANNUALIZED !

PIR Workhour Costs- Gaining

PIR Workhour Costs - Gaining

PIR Workhour Costs ~ Gaining

PIR Workhour Costs - Gaining

{27)NOTES: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _

PfR Workhour Costs- Gaining

[ Other Workhour Move Analysis I

PIR Other Workhour Costs

PIR Other Worl<hour Costs

I Distribution to Other PIR Worksheet Tabs I f Di,;trihutinn tn OthAr Ln,;ina PIR WnrksheAt Tabs I J Distribution to Otht>r Gaininn PIR Wnrk,.hAAt Tab" I

PIR Other Worl<hour Costs

Percent Change

..S.81%i

#D!V!O~

4.34%

1.93%'

-35.81%i

0.58%


Staffing - Craft Last Saved: May 30, 2014

PIR Type: 1st PIR Data Extraction Date: 09/24/13

Losing Facility: Lufkin TX CSMPC

Craft Positions

Gaining Facility: North Houston P&DC Finance #: 484143

Craft Positions

j-------(:;) ______ jj _______ (:M) ______ l ~ 1st PIR vs Pre AMP ~ 1st PIR vs Proposed ~

Total Craft Position Loss:j (190) i (217) I (P:~;~;;;;;;;re~;;:;;;rro;,.o;;i;the£x-;;~i~;s;,;'mary)

PIR Staffing - Craft

Staffing - PCES/EAS Last Saved: May 30, 2014

PIR Type: 1st PIR

Losing Facility: Lufkin TX CSMPC Finance# .:.48::.::5;.:,41;..:0 ___ _ Data Extraction Date· 9/24/2013

PCES/EAS Positions Authorized On-Rolls Staffing

(1) (2)

~~~MP; (4)

)~ .. <:p (6) (7)

u~ Position Title Level tstPIR Proposed 1st PIR

~ER EAS-22 .. t .. · 1 .1 / 1 1 TOMER SERVICES EAS-17 . ' ·a. • 3 ' 2 0

3 : 0 . 0

4 . · .•.... • 0 . 0 5 ... '/ .. · y 0

·.··· ... 0

6 ....... 0 !.: 0 7

• 0 [''::':.;•. 0

8 0 f•;. ·: ... 0 9 0 i•-·. 0

10 0 ....... _ ..... j, 0 11 0 !'i;•i •• <•.:: 0

12 0 :.·•·;:• .. ;.· ,.,_ 0

13 0 ......... ,• 0

14 •'i 0 ' ...... ··. 0

15 ··.····· ........•.... 0 ' ' ., 0 16 ........... 0 ... :;;:. .. 0 17 •· ,r. 0 ... > 0

18 .... · ·'• ·''''-/. 0 .........•.. 0

19

~ 0

~M 0

20 0 0 21 0 .I 0 22

~ 0 t·<,; .. ' I 0

23 0 I. '• ,_.,·'I 0 24 0

·-~ 0

25 0 0 26 .•...•.•. , .. > 0 0 27 . ... . 0 .. ···. 0

28 .··.•. 0 1.'' ,: ' 0

29 . : .... ; 0 [.·:,, : .. •; ' 0

30 ·:••'): .... 0 .·.····, ...... 0 31 . .:.. : ._ ... 0 ..... ';/.; 0

32 : ..... ·:.; 0 ' . ·:·. 0 33 .·,··· .· 0 ' '•. 0

34 ··- • 0 ' .. ····: ·· . 0

35 ; .... 0 .:., ·.:·:._·.· ... 0

36 :···· .. '-· 0 ··. •: . /' 0

37 .. .. ' 0 ...... ... 0

38 -_; ·._ 0 •; . . 0 39 :• "'' ...•. 0 ... ·········.' 0 40 ,'/'. ._ ... 0 .. t. 0 41 , .. ·.· .. ··· •: .. 0 .... 0 42 :••:;, ··: 0 •· ' J .· .. 0 43 ,: ....... 0 ._;· •. 0 44 :.. . ... ·'·,·· 0

~ 0

45 .. " ... 0 0 46 .. ·: i: ·.>• ' 0 0 47 ':. - •'- ·, 0 ... , .... 0 48 .. .·... :. 0 .... :! 0 49 .·· ... 0 1:· :·• 0 50 !-.···· •: 0 :;. : ' ,_ 0 51 1-' '.: i 0 I:' : . 0 52 : / 0 ·.·· ... : ,_,' 0 53 I: ·.• 0 [:'.:.·.: ···•· 0 54 -/. ,;, 0 IP.··· •· ··· 0 55 I ·;:_ :,·,> ·' 0

··~ 0

56 '•. ' ,_, 0 0 57 r·. '· : ' -·; 0 0 58 t •. : 0 ): .. 0 59 {.;, .··, 0 I ,. ·: .•: 0 60 ··''< -':•. 0 ···•.·.· 0

Totals ''•'',4•' 4 .·:-·2 _a .!

~ Variances Total On~Rolls

(15) (16)

Change 1st PIR vs 1st PIR vs Analysis PreAMP Proposed

Positions (1) (2) Percent -50.0% -66.7%

PIR Staffing- PCES/EAS

Gaining Facility: North Houston P&DC Finance # -'48-=-4.:..1:...:4.::.3 ____ _ Data Extraction Date: 9/2412013

PCES/EAS Positions Authorized Staffing

On-Rolls

(19} (20} (~I}.:.:·· (22} li (24) (25}

'L~in~~~~~~~~P~o~si~ti~on~T~it~le~---------~~L~e~ve~l~~·~~ii~AM~4>~--~s-1~PI-R~• --~-~~;~~-•d-t--ts~tP-IR-1 r 1 PLANT MANAGER (2) PCES-01 .·•.· 1 .:j , 0 0

~2~M~G~R~D71~ST~R~I~BU~T~IiO~N~O~P~E~R~A~T~IO~N~S---------~~E~A~S~-2~4~~ 2 --~--t-~2--; ~3~M~G~R~M~A~I~NT~E~N~A~N~C~E~~---------------1~E~A~S~-2~4-- 0 --~--t-~0--; ~4~M~G~R~I~N-~P~LA~N~T~S~UP~P~O;R~T~~~~---------~~E~A~S~-2~3~ 0 0

5 MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-22 1 lli0f: .. J•.• .. dl 1 1 6

MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS-21 I • .3> 'l _ ___,_o_-fi-""'3~

1:----+-.::-0--f

~~8j~MtGtRtD~ItSci:T;,R;;I~B_;;;U~7T~~I;;O;;N;otP;;E~RtA;T;IOtNtst~~~~~~~~~~~j;~E~A~s;:;:::2~0~-+ 1 2 7 OPERATIONS INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER (FI EAS 21 ~~ 3 -c 2

~9~0;P;E~RA~T~I;,O~N~S~S;,U~P~PO~RT~S~PE;C;I~A~LI~ST~--------4~E;A~S~-2~0~ 2 2 I-1::-::0+.M.;;:G~R-i=DiiiS';;;T7.;R;,;:IB';::;U-i;Ti;iiO""N;,:O;;,;P,;;E;,R:;.,Ac;,TI:c;O~NiS:-==,--------11---iE~A:;:S:-:-1"'9_ 0 II :• .. tY 0 0

11 MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SUPPT EAS-19 0 llc'iJ .. :'c'• 1 0 12 OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS-18 : .. ·. ·:. :?./:; 0 1m 0 13 OPERATIONS SUPPORT SPECIALIST EAS-17 I :.:/ 2i. i< 5 2

10

1 14 SUPVDISTRIBUTION OPERATIONS EAS-17 i' 1(\' c 32 24 15 SUPV MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS-17 I ;, l.t>> 11 ==~==~ 1 cot::::~

~16~N~E~TW~O~R~K~S~S~P;E~C~IA~L~IS~T~~~~---------~~E~A~S~-1~6~~,:...:~·:~~--~0:---i --t--~0--; 17 ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (FLO) EAS-12 .· •. · 1 0 18 PLANT MANAGER (MAJOR) PCES-01 ··•• .. •.:······• 1 1 19 LEAD SR MGR DISTRIBUTION OPERATION EAS-26 ~ 1 :,••. 0

I-2~0~M~G~R~IN~·~PL~A~N~T~S~U~P~P~O~RT~----------------~E~A~S~-2~5~~ 1---71--;t• C~,·~··,··:...::...::··___,••l------+-~1 __ , ~21~M~G~R~M~A~IN~T~E~N~AN~C~E~(l~EAD~)~~~----------I--E~A~S~-2~5~1-- l--~1--~tl:7"i:...::...:~':-~~~~-----+--~1~~ 22 MGR MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS EAS-23 3 \ 3

23 MGR TRANSPORTATION/NETWORKS EAS-23 .•.I 1 • .; ···· 1

31 .····.• ·. :. : : o L:;} _ "" o

35 I . J ;•. o k' 0 36 ·•··•• 0 ....-•....-····.,._ ··-+----t-~0~; 37 ··.. o L(.C o 38 .•. 0 0 39 • 0 ....... 0 40 0 0 41 1 .· ·. ·"· o .· · .": o 42 .··. 0 . . / 0

44 0 :.• 0

45 C· .. Q ~·· Q 46 I .. 0 ,. · •.' ·• 0

47 .. ·. 0 ··~··~···· 0

~:~:+-------------------------t-----t--~~~--:l--~~--;f~~··· ----~--~~--~ 50 .··.·•··;'0~ 0

~5~3+-----------------------------;------;~~--··· .. ~··~····.,··--~0~4~~--··~···~····;----;-~0~; 54 .. 0 ·.·.: ···•··• 0 55 .. · .. ·:.· .. ·.. 0 0 56 ·.> 0 •. ,• . 0 ~5~7+-----------------------------+------+~,.""', .. 1--... ...-;-~o~;~-~ ... ~.:;.,._.;;-----;-~ol--;

58 59 60

0 .··.··.· 0

0 0 ..c~ _..c.... 0

Totals 113 {~

Variances Total On-Rolls

Change Analysis

Positions

Percent

r----:r~;iP"ceSie"AsT _____ ti7i _____ 1 _____ (38) _____ l ! Position Loss! -2 ! 8 ! L----------------~--------------L------------~ {Above numbers are carried forward to the Executive Summary)

(33} (34}

1st PIR vs 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Proposed

3 (6) 5.6% -9.5%

PIR Staffing- PCES/EAS

Losing Facility: Lufkin TX CSMPC Finance Number: 485410

----~-----------

f········-=·······<±_~.; (2}

·····,p·~~~~i' Proposed

PVS Owned Equipment •Y .... / .. • ..• ; Seven Ton Trucks ..•• ···•• ·~ ..•• ;{f 0 Eleven Ton Trucks

·••••••·····•··. ·. :0 0

Single Axle Tractors ···;·.·'0 0 Tandem Axle Tractors . ····(} 0 Spotters .... · • 0 0

PVS Transportation I<··•••• .· ... ;.···•·•·· Number of Schedules .. c.· ·() 0 Total Annual Mileage ····.··· ········o 0

Total Mileage Costs .· '/,,;$0 $0

< ··.·.·•••••···· .. PVS Leases >. <\.

Total Vehicles Leased 1•· .·····• :f •o 0

Total Lease Costs [.·•.·••·•••·•·•··,· ... ·.·····•·······••••$o.·. $0

I< • ./ ! • PVS Workhour Costs

[:)···················· .. ·• LDC 31 (617, 679, 764) ··,· < ${) $0 LDC 34 (765, 766) r2·· $o $0

Total Workhour Costs .... $() $0

: .. ········.-

(3)

1st PIR

0

$0

$0

$0

$0

(4) Variance 1st PIR vs Pre

AMP

$0

$0

$0

Transportation - PVS Last Saved: May 30, 2014

(5) Variance 1st

PIRvs Prooosed

$0

$0 i

$0

1st PIR PIR Type: ____ ...;_ ___ _

Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2013 -to- Dec-31-2013

Gaining Facility: North Houston P&DC Finance Number: 484143

~~~-----------

(7)

Proposed

PVS Owned Equipment Seven Ton Trucks 0 Eleven Ton Trucks 0 Single Axle Tractors 0 Tandem Axle Tractors 0 Spotters 0

PVS Transportation Number of Schedules 0 Total Annual Mileage

Total Mileage CostsJ,..;.,.,;""'--'~--'-'-=

PVS Leases Total Vehicles Leased

Total Lease Costs 0

$0

(8)

PIR

0

$0

(9) (10) Variance 1st Variance 1st PIR vs Pre PIR vs

AMP Proposed

$0 $0

PVS Workhour Costs LDC 31 (617, 679, 764) LDC 34 (765, 766) t' '21~!1 ~I "':~I "·"'' "·"'I Total Workhour Costs $0 I $9,262 $9,262 $9,262

(11) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-PVS Savings: $9,262 (12) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-PVS Savings: $9,262 (This number added to the Executive Summary (This number added to the Executive Summary)

(13) Notes=-----------------------------------------------

PIR Transportation- PVS



Data of HCR Data File:

(3) (4)

1st PIR

Transportation - HCR Last Saved: May 30, 2014

(6)

PIR Type: 1st PIR

CT for Outbound Dock:

(7)

PIR Transportation HCR- Losing

Change Analysis 1st PIR vs Pre AMP I 1st PIR vs Proposed

Notes:

PIR Transportation HCR- Losing



Date of HCR Data File:

Transportation - HCR Last Saved: May 30, 2014

CET for Inbound Dock:

CET for Cancellations:

PIR Type: 1st PIR

CETforOGP: ------CT for Outbound Dock:

PIR Transportation HCR - Gaining

Notes:

Summary HCR losing & Gaining (13) I (14)

Change Analysis , 1st PIR vs Pre AMP I 1st PIR vs Proposed

Losing

Gaining

(13) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities)

$24,720

(14) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities)

Total Transportation

(15) (16)

1st PIR vs Pre 1st PIR vs Proposed

AMP

HCR $24,720 ($1 ]0,8551 __ PV_S _ , $9,2~ '--~. $9,262j

(15) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation (PVS & HCR): $33,982 (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

(16) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation (PVS & HCR): (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

PIR Transportation HCR - Gaining

MPE Inventory Last Saved: May 30, 2014

Data Extraction Date: PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2013 --to-- Dec-31-2013 -----Losing Facility: Lufkin TX CSMPC

(3) {2) (1l

E . I Pre.ti&~ 1 p ~ment 1· ·· ·· ···· · ·· roposed I 1st PIR

AFCS

I ~ ;Jj ~ I ~ I 0 ·.·.· .. ··· 0 0

AFCS200

AFSM -ALL

APPS 0 0

ClOSS ( I CSBCS I 6 ''I 0 I 0 I DBCS •• .. 4< s•· 0 0 DBCS-OSS ~. 0 . . 0 0

DIOSS I 0 0

FSS I 0 0

SPBS I 0 0

UFSM I 0 0 0

FC I MICRO MARK 0 0

ROBOT GANTRY l 0 0

HSTSI HSUS 0 0

LCTS /LCUS 0 0

LIPS I 0 0

MPBCS-OSS I 0 0

TABBER I 0 0

PIV I 0 0 0

LCREM I 0 0

(10) Notes:


(5) (6)

Equipment Proposed I 1st PIR

AFCS

{7) Proposed Relocation

Costs

0

(8) 1st PIR

Relocation Costs

(9)

Variance in Costs

0 3 $ ·~----~----~+---~~ AFCS200 7 9 $0 $0

AFSM -ALL 5 5 $0 $0

APPS 1 1 $0 $0

ClOSS 4 4 $0 $0

CSBCS 0 0 $0 $0

DBCS 42 27 $19,120 $0

DBCS-OSS 0 0 $0 $0

DIOSS 7 11 $0 $0

FSS 1 1 $0 $0

SPBS/APBS 1 1 $0 $0

UFSM 0 0 $0 $0

FC I MICRO MARK 0 0 $0 $0

ROBOT GANTRY 0 0 $0

HSTS I HSUS 0 0 $0

LCTS I LCUS 5 5 $0

LIPS 0 0 $0

MPBCS-OSS 0 0 $0

TABBER 0 0 $0

PIV 0 0 $0 $0

LCREM 2 2 $0 $0

f I t lt $19,1201 $0t ($19,120)1 ":::.. _.,;;:,...

Carried to Space Evaluation and

Other Costs

PIR MPE Inventory

LDC 36

Maintenance Last Saved May 30, 2014


Workhour Activity

Building Equipment $

Building Services $ (Custodial Cieamng)

Parts and Supplies

Grand Total $

$

SO,~'$

(2)

Proposed Costs

0 $

84,150 $

309,035 $

0 $

0 $

393,185 $

63,152 $

(3)

1st PIR Costs

246,659 $

87,991 $

390,219 $

0 $.

0 $

724,869 $

145,084 $

0 $

869,933 $

(4) Variance 1st PIR to PreAMP

()

$

$

0 $

$

(5) Variance 1st PIR to Proposed

331,684

81,912

-.--()

413,596

(11) 1st PIR vs Pre AMP- Maintenance Savings:

(12) 1st PIR vs Proposed- Maintenance Savings:

PIR Type*: _1-=.st::_P...:.I_R _____ _

Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2013 Dec-31-2013


Workhour Activity

(7)

Proposed Costs

(8)

1st PIR Costs

$ 8,311,175 $ 9,562,161 $

Parts and Supplies

Maintenance Stockroom $

and Sueplies

$

$

$

0$

Grand Total $ 17;715,37!1

1,633,305 $ 1.690,142

---2,893,622 $ 3.327,275 $

914,188 $ 706,198 $

767,127 $ 128,531 $

14,519,417 $ 15.414.306 $

3,195,958 $ 3,310.218 .$

$ 0 $

17,715,375 $ 18,724,524 $

(9) Variance 1st

PIR to Pre AMP

1,250,985

56,838 $

433,653 $

894,890

114,260

0 $

1,009,150

$772,407

$1,422,745 (These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)

(These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)

(10) Variance 1st

PIR to Pre Proposed

1,250,965

56,838

433,653

894,890

114,260

0

1,009,150

(13)Notes: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _

*Data in PIR columns is annualized for F1rst PIR

r-ev -tl8120Qa

PIR Maintenance

(1)

Distribution Changes Last Saved: May 30, 2014

Losing Facility : Lufkin TX CSMPC PIR Type: 1st PIR

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2013 --to-- Dec-31-2013

Place a "X" next to the DMM labeling list(s) revised as result of the approved AMP. Identify the date of the Postal Bulletin that contained DMM labeling list revisions.

DMM L001 DMM L011 (2) PB 22365 June 13, 2013

X DMM L002 DMM L201

DMM L003 DMM L601 Was the Service Standard Directory updated for the approved AMP?

X DMM L004 DMM L602 (3) Yes

X DMM L005 DMM L603

DMM L006 DMM L604

DMM L007 DMM L605

DMM L008 DMM L606

DMM L009 X DMM L607

DMM L010 X DMM L801 - -

(4) Drop Shipments for Destination Entry Discounts

FAST Appointment Summary Report NASS Facility Name

Month Losing I Gaining Facility Code

Nov '13 Losing Facility 759 Lufkin

Dec '13 Losing Facility 759 Lufkin

Nov'13 Gaining Facility 773 North Houston

Dec '13 Gaining Facility 773 North Houston ~- --------------·······----

(5) Notes:

Total No-Show Late Arrival 0 .en Schd Count % Count % Count %

3 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

0 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

833 272 32.65% 310 37.21% 0 0.00%

726 262 36.09% 220 30.30% 0 0.00% --

Closed Count %

3 100.00%

0 0.00%

561 67.35%

462 63.64%

Unschd Count

1

2

181

181

PIR Distribution Changes

Losing Facility: Lufkin TX CSMPC 5-Digit ZIP Code: 75904

Data Extraction Date: -::Oc-:11"'1""'01"'1~4------

1. Collection Points Number picked up before 1 p.m.

Number picked up between 1-5 p.m.

Number picked up after 5 p.m.

Customer Service Issues Last Saved: May 30, 2014

PIR Sat.

PIR Mon .• Fri. Sat.

PIR

Mon. -Fri. Sat.

nection Points 1 14S 1 ·.·•.as· 1 141 1 125 1 S!l 1 <!6 1 o 1 o 1 o f :g: 1 o 1 o 1 a 1 o 1 o 1 o

2. How many collection boxes are currently designated for "local delivery"? [-~

3. How many "local delivery" boxes were removed as a result of AMP? [-~

4. Delivery Performance Report 1st PIR

Ouarter/FY Percent

% Carriers returning after 1700 Q4 2013 60.0%

01 2014 61.9%

Q2 2014

03 2014

5. Retail Unit Inside Losing Facility (Window Service Times) 6. Business (Bulk) Mail Acceptance Hours

1st PIR Proposed 1st PIR

Start End Start End Start End

8:00 5:00PM 9:00 4:30PM 9:00 3:00PM

8:00 5:00PM 9:00 4:30PM 9:00 300PM

8:00 5:00PM 9:00 4:30PM 9:00 3:00PM

Thursday 8:00 5:00PM 9:00 4:30PM 9:00 3:00PM

7:45 l 5:45PM 8:00 5:00PM 9:00 4:30PM 9:00 300PM

10·00 1:00PM Saturday( 10:00 I 1:00PM !I 10:00 I 1:00PM f.._ ___ ...... ___ .....J NIA N/A NIA NIA

7. Can customers obtain a local postmark in accordance with applicable policies in the Postal Operations Manual? Yes

8. Notes:


9. What postmark is printed on collection mail? [ - - - - -- ·- -] ""'il9/2op&

PIR Customer Service Issues

Space Evaluation and Other Costs Last Saved: May 30, 2014


1. Affected Facility

2. One-Time Costs

Enter any one-time costs: __ ...;$:;,:;0.._ __

3. Savings Information

Space Savings ($): __ ..;$::;:0:.._ __

4. Did you utilize the acquired space as planned? Explain.

5. Notes:

Employee Relocation Costs

Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs (from MPE Inventory)

Facility Costs (from above)

Total One-Time Costs

$19,120

$0

$19,120

Date:--------

$0 $0 (These numbers shown below under One-Time Costs section.)

$0 $0 (These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)

($19,120)

$0

($19,120) PIR costs carried forward to Executive Summary)


Pre-AMP: FY 2012 Range of Report


PIR: FY 2013

PIR Space Evaluation and Other Costs

June 17, 2014...June 17, 2014 Mr. Mark Dimondstein President American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO...

Documents

Transcript of June 17, 2014...June 17, 2014 Mr. Mark Dimondstein President American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO...