April4, 2014

Mr. Mark Dimondstein President American Postal Workers

Union, AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20005-4128

Dear Mark:

Certified Mail Tracking Number: 70131090000244358694

As information, enclosed is a copy of First Post Implementation Review (PIR) for the Terre Haute, Indiana, Processing and Distribution Facility (P&DF), (SCF 478), into the Indianapolis IN, Processing and Distribution Center (P&DC) Area Mail Processing (AMP).

In accordance with the Non-disclosure Agreement February 11, 2013 the Postal Service is providing both redacted and un-redacted copies of the PIR.

If there are any questions, please contact Rickey Dean at extension 7 412.

Sincerely,

Patrick M. Devine Manager Contract Administration (APWU)

Enclosures

(CA2014-293)

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Facility Name & Type: Terre Haute P&DF

Street Address: 150 W Margaret Drive City: Terre Haute

State: IN 50 Facility ZIP Code: 47802

District: Greater Indiana Area: Great Lakes

Finance Number: 17-8695 Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 475, 478

Miles to Gaining Facility: 72 Miles EXFC office: Yes

Plant Manager: Senior Plant Manager: Jeff Mitchell

District Manager: Larry Diegel

Facility Name & Type: Indianapolis P&DC Street Address: 125 W South St

City: Indianapolis State: IN

50 Facility ZIP Code: 46206 District: Greater Indiana

Area: Great Lakes Finance Number: 17-4038

Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 460- 462 EXFC office: Yes

Plant Manager: Jeff Mitchell Senior Plant Manager: Jeff Mitchell

District Manager: Larry Diegel

Approval Date: February 20, 2012 Implementation Date: Jul-01-2013

PIR Type: 1st PIR

Redacted

Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2013: Dec-31-2013 Processing Days per Year: 310

Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,745 EAS Hours per Year: 1,819

Date of DAR Factors/Cost of Borrowing!

New Facility Start-up Costs Update June 16, 2011

Date & Time this workbook was last saved: l 03-19-2014 09:13

Area Vice President: Vice President, Network Operations:

Area AMP Coordinator: NAI Contact:

Jacqueline Krage Stako David E. Williams Stefanie Cherry Jugh Bedi I Todd Katkow

PIR Data Entry Page

Approval Signatures

2

Executive Summary Last Saved: March 19, 2014 Date Range of Data:

Losing Facility Name and Type: Street Address:

City:

State:

Current SCF ZIP Code(s):

Type of Distribution Consolidated:

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Street Address:

City:

Savings/Costs

Staffing

Service

Function 1 Workhour Savings

Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings (less Maint!Trans)

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings

Transportation Savings

Maintenance Savings

Space Savings

Total Annual Savings

Total One-Time Costs

Total First Year Savings

Craft Position Loss

PCES/EAS Position Loss

FCM Service Performance (EXFC & PFCM 0/N)

FCM Service Performance (EXFC & PFCM 2 Day)

FCM Service Performance (EXFC & PFCM 3 Day)

Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Residential at PFC level

Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Small Business at PFC level

1st PIR vs Pre AMP 1st PIR vs Approved

Losing Current Qtr Gaining Current Qtr

98.16% 96.77%

91.70% 93.71%

89.17% 91.18%

PIR Type: 1st PIR Jul-01-2013 Dec-31-2013

from Workhour Costs- Combined

from Other Curr vs Prop

from Other Curr vs Prop

from Transportation HCR and Transportation PVS

from Maintenance

from Space Evaluation and Other Costs

from Space Evaluation and Other Costs

from Stafffng-Craft

from Stafffng-PCESIEAS

from SeNice Performance & CSM

from Service Performance & CSM

from Service Performance & CSM

from Service Performance & CSM

from Service Performance & CSM

PIR Executive Summary

Calculation Beferences Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data: Pre AMP Proposed 1st PIR

Function 1 Workhour Costs $55,073,389 $51,736,079 $51 ,455, 106 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs

$1,935,055 $1,804,604 $2,014,646 (less Maintenance & Transportation)

PCES/EAS Workhour Costs $7,841,264 $7,565,683 $7,149,892 Transportation Costs $61,425,574 $60,753,008 $63,203,871

Maintenance Costs $18,608,955 $17,975,166 $18,487,806 Space Savings $0 $0 $0

Total Annual Cost $144,884,239 $139,834,540 $142,311,321

Total One-Time Costs $54,536

Total First Year Costs $144,884,239 $140,112,129 $142,365,857

Staffing

Craft Position Total On-Rolls 1,037 979 921 PCES/EAS Position Total On-Rolls 72 72.59018643 56

1st PIR vs Proposed 1st PIR vs Pre-AMP {At;!t;!roved) AMP Approved AMP

Function 1 Workhour Savings $3,618,283 $280,974 $3,337,310 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings ($79,591) ($210,042) $130,451 (less MaintfTrans)

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings $691,373 $415,792 $275,581 Transportation Savings ($1 ,778,297) ($2,450,863) $672,567

Maintenance Savings $121,149 ($512,640) $633,790 Space Savings $0 $0 $0

Total Annual Savings $2,572,918 ($2,476,781) $5,049,698

Total One-Time Costs ($54,536) $223,053 ($277,589)

Total First Year $2,518,382 $4,772,109

Staffing Craft Position Loss 116 58 58

PCES/EAS Position Loss 16 17 ( 1)

PIR Executive Summary

Summary Narrative Last Saved: March 19, 2014

Losing Facility Name and Type: Terre Haute P&DF Current SCF ZIP Code(s): 475, 478

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Indianapolis P&DC Current SCF ZIP Code(s): 460- 462

Background; The Greater Indiana District, with assistance from the Great Lakes Area, has completed the first (six-month) Post Implementation Review (PIR) of the Terre Haute, IN Processing and Distribution Facility (P&DF) Area Mail Processing (AMP). The first PIR projects a full year savings and determines whether the Postal Service increased efficiency by consolidating originating and destinating mail processing operations from SCF 4 78 Terre Haute, IN P&DF to the Indianapolis P&DC. The data for the first PIR period is July 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013.

Prior to the AMP, Terre Haute, IN P&DF processed originating and destinating volumes for service areas 4 75 and 4 78. Terre Haute P&DF's originating Priority mail volume was processed at the Indianapolis P&DC on Saturdays.

Terre Haute, IN P&DF completed transfer of originating and destinating letter, flat, Priority and Express mail volumes from SCF 478 to the Indianapolis P&DC, located approximately 72 miles away, in April of 2013. In June of 2013, Terre Haute, IN P&DF transferred originating and destinating letter, flat, Priority and Express mail volumes from SCF 475 to the Evansville, IN P&DF, which is approximately 109 miles away.

Terre Haute, IN P&DF is a postal owned facility that currently houses a retail unit and BMEU in addition to being utilized as a transfer and distribution hub.

Financial savings for the consolidation of the originating and destinating SCF 4 78 Terre Haute, IN P&DF to Indianapolis P&DC are:

Financial Summary;

Calculation References Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data:

Function 1 Workhour Costs

Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs (less Maintenance & Transportation)

PCES/EAS Workhour Costs

Transportation Costs

Maintenance Costs

Space Savings

Total Annual Cost

Total One-Time Costs

Total First Year Costs

PreAMP

$55,073,389

$1,935,055 $7,841,264

$61,425,574 $18,608,955

$0 $144,884,239

$144,884,239

Proposed

$51,736,079

$1,804,604 $7,565,683

$60,753,008 $17,975,166

$140,112,129

Total Annual Savings: 1•• PIR vs. Pre-AMP $2,572,918

tst PIR vs. Approved ($2,476,781) $223,053 Total One-Time Cost: $54,536

Total First Year Savings: $2,518,382 ($2,253, 727)

1st PIR

$51,455,106

$2,014,646 $7,149,892

$63,203,871 $18,487,806

$54,536

$142,365,857

1st PIR vs. Adjusted $5,897,018 $54,536 $5,842,482

The total projected first year savings of $2,518,382 is below the expected savings of $4,772,109. This loss is attributed primarily to a $3,324,100 increase in PVS and HCR transportation costs outside the scope of the

PIR Summary Narrative

AMP. Adjusting for these non-AMP related costs, the 1st PIR to Pre-AMP first year savings would be $5,842,482.

Customer Service Considerations: Terre Haute P&DF service performance fell in the two and three day service category. In an effort to improve performance, the district completed internal audits on the Terre Haute P&DF mail flow, adjusted transportation dispatch times and changed the containerization of mail destined for the Terre Haute P&DF hub. As a result, services score are starting to return to pre-AMP levels.

Service performance at the Indianapolis P&DC remained constant throughout the AMP process.

Transportation Considerations: The SCF 478 Terre Haute, IN to Indianapolis, IN package projected a transportation savings of$672,567. The first PIR shows a cost of $1,778,297 compared to pre-AMP levels.

PVS transportation schedules in Indianapolis P&DC increased from 79 to 141; however, none of these new schedules was a result of the consolidation of the Terre Haute volume. The PVS cost of $343,590 is not within the scope of this AMP.

Terre Haute, IN saved $556,600 with the elimination of HCRs 602L9 and 624L4. Mileage reductions to HCRs 478L9 and 478MO contributed another $507,511 in savings. The net HCR savings for Terre Haute, IN P&DF was $1,214,381 compared to pre-AMP levels.

Indianapolis, IN P&DC's HCR costs increased by $2,649,087 compared to pre-AMP levels. The majority of this cost is attributable to increases in long-hauls not within the scope of the AMP. Due to changes resulting from the national optimization initiative, HCRs 240AE, 300UE and 500AE had mileage increases that added $1,164,731 in cost. HCR 46053, an STC contract administered by Greater Indiana District, added an additional $1,815,779 due to the addition of five trips.

The net cost for the SCF 478 Terre Haute, IN P&DF to Indianapolis P&DC is $1,778,297. However, adjusting for all non-AMP related cost increases, the package shows a transportation savings of $1,545,804.

It should be noted that Terre Haute, IN P&DF's HCRs were cited in both packages. As each AMP stands alone, the savings are correct; however, the system savings is inflated.

Staffing Impacts: The approved AMP identified a net craft decrease of 58 employees and one additional EAS position with the consolidation of SCF 4 78 Terre Haute, IN P&DF volume into the Indianapolis P&DC.

Complement data for the first PIR shows a reduction of 116 craft employees and 16 EAS employees.

It should be noted that the Terre Haute, IN P&DF is still utilized as a transportation and distribution hub. As a result, the Terre Haute Post Office still has employees that perform hub functions. Six mailhandlers and two clerk expeditors share the duties associated with the hub activity. On average, these employees use a total of 45 workhours per week for this workload.

PIR Summary Narrative

The Terre Haute, IN P&DF staffing matrix is the same matrix for both the originating and destinating consolidations: SCF 478 Terre Haute, IN P&DF to Indianapolis P&DC and SCF 475 Terre Haute, IN P&DF to Evansville, IN P&DF. The impact to the employees can only be counted once.

The staffing impacts and management-to-craft ratios for SCF 4 78 Terre Haute, IN P&DF to Indianapolis P&DC are summarized below:

1 Craft/Management= All

1 Craft= F1 + F4 at Losing; F1 only at Gaining

Maintenance Impacts; The AMP projected a net annual savings of $633,790 in maintenance costs. The first PIR shows a savings of $121,419 compared to pre-AMP levels.

The Indianapolis P&DC added six DBCS machines and one APBS machine to their fleet during the PIR data period that was not included in the proposed AMP maintenance costs. These additional machines were due to other concurrent initiatives, such as the transfer of South Bend P&DC's originating Priority volume to the Indianapolis Mail Processing Annex (MPA). The result was a $769,221 increase in LDC 36 and 37, Mail Processing Equipment and Building Equipment, cost than was originally proposed

PIR Summary Narrative

Space Impacts and One Time Costs: The AMP projected a one-time cost of $277,589 for the consolidation of SCF 4 78 Terre Haute, IN P&DC into the Indianapolis P&DC. The first PIR shows a one-time cost of $54,536.

All of the one-time costs were for the installation of an additional APBS machine. This cost includes the transport, installation and equipment/material cost surrounding this addition to the Indianapolis machine set.

An additional $87,773 is allocated for the relocation and installation of an additional AFSM. These funds have not been used as of the first PIR but will be used prior to the final PIR.

Similarly, the one-time facility cost of $139,816 for the upgrades to the low cost tray sorter transport system has not been used as of the first PIR. This project is scheduled for completion prior to the final PIR.

Other Concurrent Initiatives: Prior to and during the six months of the SCF 4 78 Terre Haute, IL P&DF to Indianapolis P&DC first PIR. the losing and gaining sites engaged in other concurrent initiatives including:

• APBS machine (2) installation at the Indianapolis Mail Processing Annex (MPA), April 2013 • South Bend P&DC Originating Priority volume transferred to Indianapolis MPA, May 2013 • Fort Wayne P&DC Originating Priority volume transferred to Indianapolis MPA, May 2013 • SCF 4 75 Terre Haute, IN P&DF to Evansville, IN P&DF originating/ destinating AMP, june 2013 • A $3,324,100, non-AMP related, increase to PVS/HCR transportation costs

Conclusion: The first PIR for the consolidation of originating and destinating mail from SCF 4 78 Terre Haute, IL P&DF to Indianapolis P&DC shows reduction of85 F1/F4 FTE (full time equivalents) and 35 FTE in F38 employees. It is to be noted that the consolidation of Terre Haute into Indianapolis and Evansville, IN impacts the same pool of Terre Haute employees. The 45 clerks and 22 mailhandlers cited in this package are the same employees in the concurrent Evansville package.

The first PIR projects a first year savings of$2,518,382 compared to the expected $4,772,109 savings. The full savings potential was not realized due to non-AMP related increases in PVS and HCR transportation costs totaling $3,324,100. Adjusting for this cost, the annual savings for this PIR would be $5,842,482 which exceeds that proposed in the AMP.

PIR Summary Narrative

Losing site

Gaining Site

AMP completed on PIRType PIR Dates PIR Due

F1workhour costs Other workhour costs Management costs Transportation costs Maintenance costs Facility costs Total

One-time costs

First year costs

Savings/Costs

Terre Haute P&DF Indianapolis P&DC

61112013 1st PIR

7/1/2013 2/28/2014

Pre-AMP $55,073,389 $1,935,055 $7,841,264

$61,425,574 $18,608,955

$0 $144,884,239

$0

12/31/2013

AMP Study $51,736,079 $1,804,604 $7,565,683

$60,753,008 $17,975,166

$0 $139,834,540

$277,589

PIR Adjustments $51,455,106 $2,014,646 $7,149,892

$63,203,871 ($3,324, 1 00) $18,487,806

$0 $142,311,321 ($3,324, 1 00)

$54,536

$144,884,239 $140,112,129 $142,365,857 ($3,324, 100)

($4,772, 1 09) ($2,518,382)

Losing Site Service

PIR Briefing Sheet

Deviations

$0 {#~~~"~ ~0 :;:" ~""~\!-~ 'cj7m;. !$'1iiB't'98J,ll!J

·~ik .~ ~":I'Sli,E,

$0 'Jff'V£U!f;71!

Note: Bars are scores prior to the consolidation. Lines are scores during the PIR timeframe.

3/19/2014

Rationale

Non AMP related (HCR to

. • • •• ;·Maae.!'il'i et:; . ·vP!%

Gaining Site Service

-Q) Q) ..c en en c:

It= Q) 'i: m 0::: a:

Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement Last Saved: March 19, 2014

Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF District: Greater Indiana

Gaining Facility: Indianapolis P&DC District: Greater Indiana

PIRType: Implementation Date:

1st PIR 07/01/13

(15) Notes: ____________________ _

Satisfaction Measurement (CSM) became Customer Experience Measurement Data reflects most recently completed quarter available in GEM.

PIR Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement

Workhour Costs- Combined Facilities r------·-~---~----l

Combined Facilities Last Saved: March 19, 2014

PIR Type•: ~~~:oo;;;;;;;:.,.;;;;n;:;;,iiadj, Fln;t F'IR

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Date Range of Data: Jul-01*2013 to Oec..J1-2013

P!R Workhour Costs- Combined Facilities

P!R Workhour Costs~ Combined Facilities

P!R Workhour Costs • Combined F aci!ities

(27)NOTES: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __

-i#'ti~'

P!R Workhour Costs- Combined Facilities

Workhour Costs ~ Losing Facility Last Saved: Marcll19, 2014

Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF PIRType~: .~.~'~"pu;-,.,.,,., "''"'~"~'

Type of Distribution Consolidated:___ Orig & Oest ___ _ Date Range of Data: ~ to Oec-31·2013

f-···· ANNUAIJZEO--!

P!R Workhour Costs- Losing

PIR Workhour Costs- Losing

PIR Workhour Costs -losing

PIR Wori<hour Costs- Losing

Workhour Costs- Gaining Facility Last Saved: March 19,2014

Gaining Facility: Indianapolis P&DC PIR Type•: ~:o"5:'o':..!,I,:_;RP"IR""c"o"l""mo">""i>'"'•7nn_._,.,,,.-=-.ccd7to-c, F"'i.s~t· PIR

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Date Range of Data: Jui..01~2013 to Dec..J1-2013

PIR Workhour Costs - Gaining

P!R Workhour Costs - Gaining

P!R Workhour Costs~ Gaining

PlR Workhour Costs~ Gaining

16

1stPIR

$0

PIR Workhour Costs· Gaining

(27)NOTES: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __

PlR Workhour Costs ·Gaining

* 0 0

[ - -~·-·~·-·~ Other Workhour Move Analysis I losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF Indianapolis P&DC Date Range of Data: 12/31/13

P!R Other Workhour Costs

PI R Other Workhour Costs

Pl R Other Workhour Costs

PIR Other Workhour Costs

[ Distribution to Other PIR Worksheet Tabs -~

Pl R Other Workhour Costs

PIR Other Workhour Costs

Staffing -Craft Last Saved: March 19, 2014

PIR Type: 1st PIR Data Extraction Date: 01/10/14

Craft Positions

Finance#: 17-4038

Craft Positions

~-----------~------------~ I (23) I (24) I

! 1st PIR vs Pre AMP ! 1st PIR vs Proposed ! Total Craft Position Loss: L ____ !..:_~ ____ j _____ _:~-----J

(Above numbers are carried forward to the Executive Summary)

PIR Staffing -Craft

Staffing - PCES/EAS

Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF Data Extraction Date: 1/10/2014

PCES/EAS Positions

Last Saved: March 19, 2014

PIR Type: 1st PIR

Finance # 17-8695 -------

PIR Staffing - P ES/EAS

Gaining Facility: Indianapolis P&DC Finance # .c1C!7:::-4~0:.:!3::::8 ____ _ Data Extraction Date: 1/10/2014

PCES/EAS Positions

,,_.,_.,_., .. ,_.,_.,_.,_.,-r,--~--~--~--~--~--~--1--'_., .. ,_.,_., .. ,_.~

j Total PCES/EAS1 (37

) 1

(38

) 1

j Position Lossj 16 j 17 j ~~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~~~--~--~--~--~--~--~--j--,_.,_.,_.,_.,_.,._~

(Above numbers are carried forward to the Executive Summary)

PIR Staffing- PCES/EAS

Transportation - PVS Last Saved: March 19, 2014

Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF Finance Number: ....:1~7...:-8:.:6:.:9::::5 _____ _

(11) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-PVS Savings: $343,590 (This number added to the Executive Summary

1~t PIR PIR Type: ------------~---------

Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2013

Gaining Facility: Indianapolis P&DC Finance Number: 17-4038

~~~---------

--to -- Dec-31-2013

(12) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-PVS Savings: $343,590 (This number added to the Executive Summary)

(13) Notes: -----------:----:-:--:::-:-:-:-:------;:=-:-:::::==-::=-:-::::::;::;:;::::-:;::::::-;::;::::~~;;;-;;;:;;;-;;::;;:;=u;-:rh:;;;;;~~;;;;;;;ici;;the;~;-;;f---While the number of PVS schedules increased from 79 to 141, none of these increases were a result of the Terre Haute 0/D AMP into Indianapolis. These changes were outside the scope of

the AMP.

PIR Transportation- PVS

Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest

Data of HCR Data File:

Transportation - HCR Last Saved: March 19, 2014

PIR Type: 1st PIR

CT for Outbound Dock:

PIR Transportation HCR- Losing

Change Analysis 1st PIR vs Pre AMP I 1st PIR vs Proposed

Notes:

PIR Transportation HCR- Losing

Gaining Facility: Indianapolis P&DC

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest

Date of HCR Data File:

(1)

Route#

Transportation - HCR Last Saved: March 19, 2014

CET for Inbound Dock:

CET for Cancellations:

(6) (7)

Proposed 11 st PIR Annual Annual Cost Cost

PIR Type: 1st PIR

CETforOGP:

CT for Outbound Dock:

(9)

------(10)

1st PIR Annual Cost/Mile

PIR Transportation HCR- Gaining

Notes:

Summary HCR Losing & Gaining (12) (13) I (14)

Change Analysis 1st PIR vs Pre AMP I 1st PIR vs Proposed

Losing

Gaining

(13) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities)

$1,434,706

(14) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities)

HCR PVS

1st PIR vs Pre AMP

$1,434,706 $343,590

(15) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation (PVS & HeR): $1,778,297 (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

(16) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation (PVS & HeR): (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

1st PIR vs Proposed

$2,107,273

1st PIR vs Proposed

$2,107,273 $343,590

$2,450,863

PIR Transportation HCR- Gaining

MPE Inventory Last Saved: March 19, 2014

Data Extraction Date: 01/15/13 PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2013 --to-- Dec-31-2013

Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF Gaining Facility: Indianapolis P&DC

(5) (6)

1st PIR

(10) Notes:

The APBS relocation cost includes a $836.36 transport cost (APBS to new facility), a $95,635 workhour cost for installation and a $12,600 eqiupment cost (anhors and lift kits). The AFSM machine relocation cost of $87,773 has not been used as of the 1st PIR, but the intent is for this relo to occur before the final PIR.

(7) Proposed Relocation

Costs

(8) 1st PIR

Carried to Space Evaluation and

(9)

PIR MPE Inventory

Maintenance Last Saved March 19, 2014

Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF

$

$

$

$

$

Parts and Supplies

Grand Total

(13)

(2)

I (3)

Proposed 1st PIR Costs Costs

(5) I

0 $ 32,370

72,010 $ 27,535

328,485 $ 36,494

---0 $ 6,637

0 $ 0

400,495 $ 103,036

168,178

0

271,214

(11) 1st PIR vs Pre AMP- Maintenance Savings:

(12) 1st PIR vs Proposed- Maintenance Savings:

PIR Type*: _:.1..:..st:..:.P_:.IR'--------Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2013 : Dec-31-2013

Gaining Facility: Indianapolis P&DC

Grand Total

$512,640

I (7) (8) (9) Variance 1st

Proposed 1st PIR PIR to Pre Costs Costs AMP

8,028,873 $ 8,427,539 550,031 $

2,095,239 $ 2,465,794 452,296

2,924,146 $ 3,241,073 316,927

902,156 $ 1,020,746 118,589

257,195 $ 75,763

14,207,610 15,230,914 1,278,525

2,985,678

0

18,216,592 1,175,292 $

(These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)

(These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)

*Data in P!R columns is annualized for First P!R

(10)

Variance 1st PIR to Pre Proposed

398,666

370,555

316,927

118,589

1,023,305

879,651

PIR Maintenance

(1)

Distribution Changes Last Saved: March 19, 2014

Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF PIR Type: 1st PIR

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2013 --to-- Dec-31-2013

Place a "X" next to the DMM labeling list(s) revised as result of the approved AMP.

DMM L001 DMM L011

Identify the date of the Postal Bulletin that contained DMM labeling list revisions.

(2) March 21, 2013

X DMM L002 X DMM L201

DMM L003 DMM L601

DMM L004 DMM L602

X DMM L005 DMM L603

DMM L006 DMM L604

DMM L007 DMM L605

DMM LOOS DMM L606

DMM L009 DMM L607

DMM L010 DMM L801

(4) Drop Shipments for Destination Entry Discounts

FAST Appointment Summary Report

Was the Service Standard Directory updated for the approved AMP?

<3l Yes

NASS Facility Name

Total No-Show Late Arrival Oren Month Losing I Gaining Facility Code Schd Count % Count % Count %

Nov '13 Losing Facility 478 Terre Haute, IN P&DF N/A

Dec '13 Losing Facility 478 Terre Haute, IN P&DF N/A

Nov '13 Gaining Facility 460 Indianapolis, IN P&DC 337 110 32.64% 60 17.80% 0 0.00%

Dec '13 Gaining Facility 460 Indianapolis, IN P&DC 294 86 29.25% 62 21.09% 0 0.00% ~ . - '

Count

227

208

Closed %

67.36%

70.75%

(5lNotes: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------==============

PIR Distribution Changes

Unschd Count

3

6

Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF

5-Digit ZIP Code: 4 7802 Data Extraction Date: -:0.:,.1/7:1'=5/'::1-:4------

1. Collection Points Number picked up before 1 p.m.

Number picked up between 1-5 p.m.

Number picked up after 5 p.m.

Total Number of Collection Points

Customer Service Issues Last Saved: March 19,2014

2. How many collection boxes are currently designated for "local delivery"? c-o-]

3. How many "local delivery" boxes were removed as a result of AMP? c-o-]

4. Delivery Performance Report

% Carriers returning after 1700

5. Retail Unit Inside Losing Facility (Window Service Times) 6. Business (Bulk) Mail Acceptance Hours

7. Can customers obtain a local postmark in accordance with applicable policies in the Postal Operations Manual? Yes

8. Notes:

Gaining Facility: Indianapolis P&DC

9. What postmark is printed on collection mail? [------- - ----- - l PIR Customer Service Issues

Space Evaluation and Other Costs Last Saved: March 19, 2014

Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF Date: ________ _

1 . Affected Facility

2. One-Time Costs

Enter any one-time costs: _..:,S1.:.:3;;;;9:,:.8.:.:1,:;:6 __ $0 ($'139,816) (These numbers shown below under One-Time Costs section.)

3. Savings Information

Space Savings($): __ ...;s;,;;o __ _ $0 $0 (These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)

4. Did you utilize the acquired space as planned? Explain.

5. Notes:

The one-time facility cost of $139,816 has not yet been utilized. Prior to the final PIR, the site will use these funds for LCTS enhancements.

Employee Relocation Costs

Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs (from MPE Inventory)

Facility Costs (from above)

Total One-Time Costs

Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF

Pre-AMP: FY 2012

$137,773 ($83,237)

$139,816 ($139,816)

$277,589 $54,536 ($223,053) P!R costs carrled f01ward to Executive Summary)

Gaining Facility: Indianapolis P&DC

Range of Report PIR: FY 2013

(6) (9)

Product

PIR Space Evaluation and Other Costs