July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like...

44
July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer

TAGS:

Transcript of July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like...

Page 1: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

July 30, 20129:00 – 10:30 a.m.

by Doug Greer

Page 2: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district?

What are the highlights of ESEA waiver regarding accreditation?

How will we communicate to our community about changes in accrediation?

Page 3: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.
Page 4: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

Presentation to MI-EXCEL ISD/ESA Meeting

July 19, 2012

Venessa Keesler, Ph.D.

Evaluation Research and Accountability

Bureau of Assessment and Accountability

ESEA FLEXIBILITY, PRIORITY AND FOCUS SCHOOLS:

UPDATE

Page 5: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

HOW DOES ESEA FLEX HELP MI?

• Supports career and college ready focus for all students

• Increased focus on accelerating student achievement and closing gaps

• Modifies current accountability to reflect cut scores; eliminates requirement of 100% proficient by 2014 and identification of all schools not making AYP.

• Helps enhance system of supports• Targets resources

Page 6: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

1. Timeline for Determining Adequate Yearly Progress, 100% by 2013-14

2. Implementation of School Improvement Requirements, Corrective Actions & Restructuring for schools not making AYP at the LEA level

3. Same as above at SEA level

4. Rural LEA $$$ dependent on AYP status

5. School wide Title I eligibility requires 40%+ F/R

6. Support of School Improvement ($ follows NCLB labels i.e. Improvement, Corrective Action & Restructuring)

7. Reward Schools $ Incentives section 1117(c) - unfunded

8. Highly Qualified Teachers Improvement Plans

9. Transfer Certain Funds to Title I-A limited

10. School Improvement Grant Funds to Support Priority Schools 1003(g)

(Optional) Use of 21st Century Community Learning Center Program Funds (MI elected not to waive this but did add “replacement of principal”)

Page 7: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

Four Principles

1. College and Career Ready Expectations for all Students (CCSS, new cut scores and SBAC)

2. State-Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support (Reward, Focus, Priority)

3. Supporting Effective Instruction and Leadership (Option A focuses on teacher evaluations in Waiver currently in development with MCEE)

4. Reducing Duplication and Unnecessary Burden

Page 8: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

Principal 2 – Accreditation & Accountability

1. Top to Bottom Ranking given to all schools with 30 or more students tested, full academic year (0 – 99th percentile where 50th is average)

2. NEW designation for some schools Reward schools (Top 5%, Significant Improvement or

Beating the Odds) Focus schools (10% of schools with the largest

achievement gab between the top and bottom) Priority schools (Bottom 5%, replaces PLA list)

3. NEW in 2013, AYP Scorecard based on point system replacing the “all or nothing” of NCLB.

Page 9: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

9

Understanding the TWO LabelsPriority/Focus/Reward

(Top to Bottom List)AYP Scorecard (Need > 50%)

Green-Yellow-RedNormative—ranks schools

against each otherCriterion--referenced—are schools achieving a certain

PROFICIENCY level?Focuses attention on a smaller

subset of schools; targets resources

Given to all schools; acts as an “early warning” system; easy

indicatorsThe primary mechanism for

sanctions and supportsUsed primarily to identify areas

of intervention and differentiate supports

Fewer schools All schools

Page 10: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

10

Michigan’s Differentiated System of Accountability

GreenSchools

YellowSchools

RedSchools

Title I Schools: Required to

Set-aside 20% District and

10% Building Title I Funds

Bottom5%

PrioritySchools

Top 5%Reward Schoolsplus BtO or Improv

10% (or more) Focus Schools

(with the greatest achievement Gap)

PLUS most schools are also given a percentile ranking ranging from the 1st percentile to the 99th percentile (if n > 30 FAY)

Page 11: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

ACCOUNTABILITY SCORECARD (2013)

• Will replace AYP

• Differentiated targets for each school, based on getting to 85% proficient in 10 years

• Subgroup targets = same as school

• Safe harbor based on four year improvement slope.

Page 12: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.
Page 13: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

July 19: ESEA Waiver approved unconditionally

July 30: Overview of Waiver at OAISD

Tuesday, July 31: “Embargoed” notice to district superintendents of Priority and Focus schools

Wednesday, August 1: MDE Webinars

Thursday, August 2: Likely public release and embargo lifted

Page 14: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.
Page 15: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.
Page 16: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

ACCOUNTABILITY TIMELINES• August 2012:

• AYP (original system with new targets to accommodate new cut scores for approximately 3,400 schools)

• Education Yes! (original system; not modified)

• Top to Bottom Ranking (2,866 schools)

• Priority Schools (formerly PLA) (146 schools)

• Focus Schools (358 schools)

• Reward Schools (286 schools)

• August 2013: New AYP Scorecard

Page 17: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

What is staying THE SAME in August?

What will be NEW in August?

AYP (general structure, designations)

• New targets (reset for new cut scores)• District AYP – now K-12• Graduation rate: includes all

subgroups (USED requirement)

EducationYES! (no changes)

Lowest performing schools will be identified

• Will be named Priority schools (instead of PLA)

• Will be identified as lowest 5% of the Top to Bottom metric (instead of original methodology)

Focus and Reward Schools identified

Page 18: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

Tuesday, July 31: “Embargoed” notice to district superintendents of Priority and Focus schools

Thursday, August 2: Likely public release◦Ed YES! Report Card (letter grade)◦AYP Status (pass or fail)◦Top to Bottom Ranking◦Optional designation (Reward, Focus or

Priority)

Page 19: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

New Cut Scores …◦ Therefore, students had “higher” proficiency

levels (i.e. 1’s became 2’s, 2’s became 3’s, etc.)◦ Achievement Status is based on an Index number

whose denominator is computed by summing the “higher” proficiency levels.

Index numbers decreased

however, State legislation did NOT change.

Page 20: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

Feds approve NEW AYP targets in light of the ESEA Waiver application

Page 21: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

Before we move on to the Top to Bottom Rankings and NEW designations (Reward, Focus or Priority) …

What questions do you have about the upcoming release of AYP status and EdYES! Report Cards (letter grades)?

NOTE: Our communications team, led by Michelle Ready, has talking points & a sample letter available for you today!

Page 22: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

TOP TO BOTTOM RANKINGRanks all schools in the state with at least 30 full academic year students in at least two tested content areas (Reading, Writing, Math, Science and Social Studies weighted equally plus graduation).•Each content area is “normed” in three categories:

• 2 years of Achievement (50 – 67%)• 3 – 4 years of Improvement (0 – 25%)• Achievement gaps between top and bottom (25 – 33%)

•Graduation rate (10% if applicable)• 2 year Rate (67%)• 4 year slope of improvement (33%)

Page 23: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

For science, social studies, writing, and grade 11 all tested subjects

HOW IS THE TOP TO BOTTOM RANKING CALCULATED

Two-Year Average

Standardized Student Scale

(Z) Score

Four-Year Achievement Trend Slope

Two-Year Average Bottom 30% - Top 30%

Z-Score Gap

School Achievement

Z-Score

School Performance Achievement

TrendZ-Score

School Achievement Gap Z-Score

School Content

Area Index

1/2

1/4

1/4

Content

Index Z-

score

Page 24: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

For graduation rate

HOW IS THE TOP TO BOTTOM RANKING CALCULATED

Two-Year Average

Graduation Rate

Four-Year Graduation Rate

Trend Slope

School Graduation Rate

Z-Score

School Graduation Rate

TrendZ-Score

School Graduatio

n Rate Index

2/3

1/3

Grad Index

Z-score

Page 25: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

Calculating an overall ranking for a school with a graduation rate

HOW IS THE TOP TO BOTTOM RANKING CALCULATED

School Graduation

Rate Std Index

School Mathematics

Std Index

School Reading Std Index

School Science Std Index

School Social Studies Std

Index

School Writing Std Index

Overall Standardized School Index

18%

18%

18%

18%

18%

10%

Overall School Percentile Rank

Page 26: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

Year X Grade Y MEAP

Performance Level

Year X+1 Grade Y+1 MEAP Performance LevelNot

ProficientPartially

Proficient Proficient Adv

Low Mid High Low High Low Mid High Mid

NotProficient

Low M I I SI SI SI SI SI SIMid D M I I SI SI SI SI SIHigh D D M I I SI SI SI SI

PartiallyProficient

Low SD D D M I I SI SI SIHigh SD SD D D M I I SI SI

ProficientLow SD SD SD D D M I I SIMid SD SD SD SD D D M I IHigh SD SD SD SD SD D D M I

Advanced Mid SD SD SD SD SD SD D D M

Page 27: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

For grade 3-8 reading and mathematics

HOW IS THE TOP TO BOTTOM RANKING CALCULATED

Two-Year Average

Standardized Student Scale

(Z) Score

Two-Year Average

Performance Level Change

Index

Two-Year Average Bottom 30% - Top 30%

Z-Score Gap

School Achievement

Z-Score

School Performance Level Change

Z-Score

School Achievement Gap Z-Score

School Content

Area Index

1/2

1/4

1/4

Content

Index Z-

score

Page 28: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

Calculating an overall ranking for a school without a graduation rate

HOW IS THE TOP TO BOTTOM RANKING CALCULATED

School Mathematics

Std Index

School Reading Std Index

School Science Std Index

School Social Studies Std

Index

School Writing Std Index

Overall School Standardized

Index

20%

20%

20%

20%

20%

Overall School Percentile Rank

Page 29: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.
Page 30: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

WHAT ARE PRIORITY SCHOOLS?

30

• Formerly known as PLA schools (Federal and state accountability now aligned)

• Bottom 5% replaces the tiered list as the identification strategy for PLA schools (includes both Title I and non-Title I schools)

• Year 1 planning (Closure, Restart, Turn-around or Transformation), Year 2 – 4 Implementation

Page 31: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

WHAT ARE FOCUS SCHOOLS?

31

• Schools with the largest achievement gaps.

• Achievement gap is defined as the difference between the average scale score for the top 30% of students and the bottom 30% of students.

• This methodology is an improvement over using a solely demographic-based gap methodology because it targets achievement gaps.

Page 32: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

WHAT ARE FOCUS SCHOOLS?

32

• Identifying Focus Schools is a critical component to Michigan achieving key goals:• -to close the achievement gap within schools

• -to reduce the achievement gap statewide

• Common Concerns• Are schools more likely to be Focus schools if they have

____________ kids (fill in the blank)?

• Does methodology target high performing schools?

• Does methodology target high socio-econ classes?

Page 33: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

33

Page 34: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

ARE CERTAIN TYPES OF SCHOOLS MORE LIKELY TO BE FOCUS SCHOOLS?

• Have not detected any significant patterns yet

• Continuing to analyze the data

• Because metric compares top 30 percent of kids to bottom 30 percent of kids in the school, it’s unlikely the gap is being driven exclusively by one group or type of kids.

Page 35: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

02

04

06

08

01

00P

erc

ent E

con

omic

ally

Dis

adva

nta

ged

0 20 40 60 80 100Overall Percentile Rank

Focus Schools Non-Focus Schools35

Page 36: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

02

04

06

08

01

00P

erc

ent M

inor

ity S

tude

nts

in B

uild

ing

0 20 40 60 80 100Overall Percentile Rank

Focus Schools Non-Focus Schools36

Page 37: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

NON-FOCUS/FOCUS SCHOOLS BY SUBGROUP

37

0.2

.4.6

.8Non-Focus School Focus School

p 50 of bottom30ed p 50 of bottom30sep 50 of bottom30lep p 50 of bottom30whitep 50 of bottom30black p 50 of bottom30asian

p 50 of bottom30hispanic p 50 of bottom30multi

Graphs by focusv1

Page 38: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

05

01

000

50

100

0 50 100 0 50 100

Urban Suburb

Town Rural

Focus School Non-Focus School

Pe

rcen

t ED

Stu

dent

s

School Percentile Rank

Graphs by locale4cat38

Page 39: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

05

01

00

0 50 100 0 50 100

Elementary/Middle School High School

Focus Non-Focus

Pe

rcen

t ED

Stu

dent

s

Overall Percentile Rank

Graphs by gradespan39

Page 40: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

Before we move on to the last section regarding IF you have a Focus school …

What questions do you have about the upcoming release of Top to Bottom rankings and NEW designations (Priority, Focus and Reward schools)?

Page 41: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

Summer, 2012: MDE development of toolkit based on MI School Imp. Framework and Academy of Pacesetting Districts.

August 2: Public release of Focus schools

District responds with communications with the support of OAISD talking points.

September: Districts will be provided a toolkit and possibly a “DIF” District Improvement Facilitator (if multiple Title I buildings)

Page 42: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

Deep data diagnosis led by toolkit and/or DIF by October 1, 2012.

Oct. 1 – Jan. 30: Professional dialogue led by toolkit and/or DIF, revised SIP and Cons. App.

Quarterly reports to school board required.

Unlike Priority label, Focus label may only be one year. (MDE monitors both Top and Bottom 30% for improvement)

Page 43: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

Some schools may be exempt from Focus school designation in year 2 IF they are deemed Good-Getting-Great (G-G-G):◦ Overall achievement is above 75th percentile◦ Bottom 30% meets Safe Harbor improvement (or

possibly AYP differentiated improvement)

G-G-G schools will be exempt for 2 years, then will need to reconvene a similar deep diagnostic study in year 4.

Note: See ESEA Approved Waiver pp. 151-152

Page 44: July 30, 2012 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. by Doug Greer. What will accountability such as AYP look like this August and how will this impact our district? What.

Tuesday, July 31: “Embargoed” notice to district superintendents of Priority and Focus schools

Thursday, August 2: Public release likely of the following:◦ Ed YES! Report Card (old letter grade)◦ AYP Status (old pass or fail system)◦ Top to Bottom Ranking and possibly:

Reward schools (Top 5%, Top improvement, BtO) Focus schools (largest achievement gap top vs.

bottom) Priority schools (Bottom 5%)

Doug Greer877-702-8600 x4109

[email protected]


Greer Company Crane Systems - Giuffre - Telehandlersgiuffre.com/manuals/greer/mg500/MG500R-Training.pdf · Greer Company Crane Systems GREER COMPANY 1918 E. Glenwood Place, Santa

Greer Company Crane Systems - Giuffre - Telehandlersgiuffre.com/manuals/greer/mg500/MG500R-Training.pdf · Greer Company Crane Systems GREER COMPANY 1918 E. Glenwood Place, Santa

doit marketing doitmarketing AYP conference

doit marketing doitmarketing AYP conference

1 Children Left Behind in AYP and Non-AYP Schools: Using Student Progress and the Distribution of Student Gains to Validate AYP Kilchan Choi Michael Seltzer.

1 Children Left Behind in AYP and Non-AYP Schools: Using Student Progress and the Distribution of Student Gains to Validate AYP Kilchan Choi Michael Seltzer.

Ohio’s Experience with AYP

Ohio’s Experience with AYP

Ayp issue 31 newsletterv5

Ayp issue 31 newsletterv5

Adult Youth Partnership (AYP)

Adult Youth Partnership (AYP)

Ayp issue 31 newsletterv7

Ayp issue 31 newsletterv7

Ayp issue 31 newsletterv6

Ayp issue 31 newsletterv6

Ayp newsletter 2

Ayp newsletter 2

LYSD and State AYP Comparisons. LYSD Schools Meeting AYP AYP LevelTitle 1 School Emmonak SchoolLevel 5 (1 st year meeting AYP)YES Marshall SchoolLevel.

LYSD and State AYP Comparisons. LYSD Schools Meeting AYP AYP LevelTitle 1 School Emmonak SchoolLevel 5 (1 st year meeting AYP)YES Marshall SchoolLevel.

Ayp issue 31 newsletterv13

Ayp issue 31 newsletterv13

2014 AYP Conference Guide

2014 AYP Conference Guide

Ayp issue 31 newsletterv16

Ayp issue 31 newsletterv16

AYP vs. AEIS

AYP vs. AEIS

2011 Final AYP School List - Missourimcds.dese.mo.gov/quickfacts/AYP Federal Accountability/2011 AYP... · Final Missouri AYP Summary, 2011 Improvement Status of All Schools, with

2011 Final AYP School List - Missourimcds.dese.mo.gov/quickfacts/AYP Federal Accountability/2011 AYP... · Final Missouri AYP Summary, 2011 Improvement Status of All Schools, with

Lamont greer aug 30, 2011 1104 am - 331 l-greer_slideshow

Lamont greer aug 30, 2011 1104 am - 331 l-greer_slideshow

Ayp issue 31 newsletterv3

Ayp issue 31 newsletterv3

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Fact Sheet · – Raising the AYP Bar ... Schools must make AYP in every student group in order to meet AYP. The goal of NCLB is for all students to

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Fact Sheet · – Raising the AYP Bar ... Schools must make AYP in every student group in order to meet AYP. The goal of NCLB is for all students to

Ayp issue 31 newsletter

Ayp issue 31 newsletter

AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.

AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.