841 32ND AVE. • SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94121949.300.6271 • JESTINW@GMAIL.COM

EDUCATION THE BOSTON ARCHITEC TUR AL COLLEGE 2005-2010 B a c h e l o r o f D e s i g n S t u d i e s B oston, MA • Architectural Technology

EMPLOYMENT JOB C APTAIN 2011-Present R L S - Te c h n o l o g y I n f ra s t r u c t u r e, A u d i o v i s u a l Sy s t e m s, S an Francisco, C A M e d i a Fa c i l i t i e s D e s i g n , B u i l d i n g I n f o r m a t i o n Te c h n o l o g y • VM Ware Teleproduction Studio - Managed project and personel from SD through CA - Heavily involved in writing contracts, estimating fees, and negotiating change items • INC Media Services Production Facility - Managed production of CD’s, design sketches - Developed data center design w/ tech engineer • Google Studio G - Developed acoustic details & matrix room containment system • Office BIM (Revit) Manager

JOB C APTAIN/BIM MANAGER 2007-2011 A r c h i t e c t u ra l R e s o u r ce s C a m b r i d g e - Pr i va t e K- 1 2 , Cambridge, MA H i g h e r E D, L a b o ra t o r y, & L a r g e Pr i va t e O f f i ce • Albert “Albie” Sherman Center - 500,000 sf research facility in Worcester MA - All phases in “fast-track” project (programming/SD/CD/CA) - Extensive consultant coordination (Structural/Civil/MEP/Landscape) - Personnel management - Client & “use group” interaction • Project BIM Manager - Managed project (file transfer/training/coordination/legal)

DESIGN DR AFTER 2006-2007 T h o m a s C a r e y A r c h i t e c t - R e s i d e n t i a l B oston, MA • Worked on all phases of private residential home/garage projects

DESIGN DR AFTER/ARCHITEC T ’S ASSISTANT 2005-2006 Ta y l o r & B u r n s A r c h i t e c t s - I n s t i t u t i o n a l B oston, MA • CA - reviewed submittals/change items/rfi’s • MEP & structural coordination, interior layout design, systems & product research

C AD OPER ATOR 2003-2005 PJ H M A r c h i t e c t s - K- 1 2 E d u ca t i o n S an Clemente, C A • CD’s - redlines/code research/minor coordination

SKILLS DESIGN • Broad knowledge of design criteria for multiple building types with emphasis on research, technology, educational, and studio

LEADERSHIP • Proven ability to lead others, communicate design criteria/agenda, & improve efficiency • Managed heavy work loads & multitasking through detailed notes/schedules • Experience in cultivating relationship consultants/clients

DIGITAL & BIM • Revit 2013/AutoCAD 2013/VectorWorks/Navisworks Simulate • Sketchup/Photoshop CS5/InDesign CS5 • Microsoft Office Suite/Newforma

JESTIN WOLIN

ARC - ALBERT

ARC - ALBERT SHERMAN

CENTERFEB 2009 - FEB 2011

The Albert Sherman Center is a 500,000 sf research and education facility for the Univeristy of MA, Worcester. It is home to advanced therapeutics, learning communities and a center for experimental learning. It also house 100 researchers. The overall budget of $400 million includes site develpment, a new research center, and an offsite parking garage. It is scheduled to open in the winter of 2012.

My main function on the team is to assist with major HVAC and structural coordination, assist with organization and development of design packages, solve and document design and building problems, and act as BIM (Revit) Manager.

This was one of hundreds of smaller site analysis studies that ranged from looking at traffic patterns, sun paths, parking, topography, green space, etc. This study in particular looks at pedestrian access to the entire cluster of medical and research buildings. Some of our design focus was dedicated to providing better pedestrian access to a site where winters can be brutal. We provided a series of access nodes as well as a major junction point to keep people moving and inside out of the cold.

This study was looking at vehicular access and potential high traffic areas. Considering the increased population from our new building, we had to make sure there was ample parking, streetlights, and safe routes for emergency vehicles dedicated to the medical center. We provided a drop off for public transportation on the north side of the site as well as a pedestrian bridge over Plantanation Street to the west to ease the traffic burden off of the busy South Street. 2

Our intial program diagrams were the result of client use group meetings and precendent studies. I worked closely with our project manager to devlope some of these layouts. The orange represents circulation and public space, yellow is laboratory, and blue is education. These diagrams not only acted as prelimary bubble diagrams for different departments and how they intermingled, but also helped us define the the beginnings of our exterior facade expressions as well.

The goal was to create an overall building mass where the materials and form depicted the interior function of the building. You can directly relate these models to the program diagrams above. The laboratory and more private functions are modeled as dark brown, the circulation as tan, and education components as white. These models start to define three different exterior expessions. The transparency levels and materiality are based on the function they represent The models also show our thoughts on how these three expressions might be combined through different joining methods. These were some of our first passes materiality and form.

This is a recent study I’ve done looking at options for a bridge connection from our building to a parking garage. We are required to build a fire separation between the two separate buildings which will require an addition to the garage.

The images in the left column suggest 2 fire walls, one bearing on the bridge and the other on the garage. They are in place so that if one structure fails, the other is still in place. The down side to this option is the addition of a vestibule in the garage and also the tricky details involved in fireproofing the existing exposed steel in the area. As you can see in the rendering above, I’m looking to match the expression of an existing security office clad in metal panel (brown) and set back from the precast banding (gray).

The images in the right column show a structurally independant fire wall. This gives us the opportunity to incorporate a wall as more of a design element. We have existing granite fin walls along our new building and the repeated pattern would ease the transition from a curtain wall heavy building to a precast concrete parking garage. We do avoid having a vestibule here, but, this option is much more expensive due to materials and the added structure involved.

This is a fast track project and as such we have major hurdles to leap. One major issue I’ve worked on lately is trying to solve conflicts with underground utilities. The contractor is wanting to start blasting through bedrock for excavation. The problem is we have major unknowns when it comes to underground utilities. Our MEP engineers typically like to design from the top down and we’re asking them to start with the bottom.

The plan above starts to show some of the obstacles we are needing to avoid. Two electrical duct banks, a water and a sewer main need to navigate around around a foundation for a pedestrian bridge above. The utilities need to stay as far from the bridge foundation as possible due to a construction sequencing issue. The utilities will be constructed well before the bridge so there needs to be space for excavation and construction of the foundation between our utilities. There is also an existing utility tunnel to the east and the Albert Sherman Center, or ASC, foundation to the west. The hatched area designates a 10’-0” offset from the ASC that represents a stricter plumbing code and the jurisdiction of a plumbing inspector. We want to keep the sewer and water lines clear of this area. The solution is to bend the ductbanks around the bridge foundation to west and the plumbing to east, away from the plumbing inspector’s jurisdiction.

4

There are a new set of issues sectionally. The simplest is a 10’-0” minimum separation between the water and sewer mains, the water main most definitely needs to be at a higher elevation to avoid seepage from the sewer main getting near the clean water. The second and more pressing issue was that of total degrees of bend radius in the ductbanks (shown in crosshatch). The maximum preferred is 270 degrees. With the plan and section bends we were able to just make it, some of my earlier options showed the ductbanks making more bends.

This was a major piece of coordination that spanned 4 professions; civil, structural, electrical, and architectural. This was a great learning experience for me. I can’t wait to see it built.

ARCHITECTURAL MODEL

STRUCTURAL MODEL

MEP MODEL

A big piece of my job description is major systems coordination and BIM manager. Being the point man for conveying design intent and conflicts and managing our models is more than just sending models back and forth.

Keeping these models clean and organized is essential. Not only do I manage how we build our models, but also set the standard and QC our consultants models. I’ve put together guidlines for team members to follow and participated in discusions with our lawyers in creating legal documents as well as a BIM execution plan describing our process and deliverables.

Quality is important to for our reputation and improves how well we work with consultants. Nothing like a clean model to help provide some professional respect. One of our major principles at ARC is dedication to the needs of the client. Our design models are deliverables on this project and keeping the client happy is key for their confidence in us and repeat business.

6