January 6, 2011ICLATIP-3 Kathmandu University Nepal 1 Proposal for the realization of Santilli's...

January 6, 2011 ICLATIP-3 Kathmandu University Nepal

1

Proposal for the realization of Santilli's comparative test on the gravity of electrons and positrons via a

horizontal supercooled vacuum tube

Dr. ir. Victor de Haan BonPhysics Research and Investigations BV, Puttershoek, The Netherlands

www.bonphysics.nl

Under partial support by The R. M. Santilli Foundation, Grant Number RMS-AM-4673rs82810


2

Outline

• Introduction

• Principle

• Requirements

• Conclusions


3

Introduction

e-e+


4

• Experimental detection: J. J. Thomson (1897)

• Mass: +9.10938215(45)×10−31 kg• Electric charge: −1.602176487(40)×10−19 C

• Magnetic moment: −1.00115965218111 μB (A. H. Compton 1917, G.E. Uhlenbeck S. Goudsmit 1926)

• Weight: ?

History

electrone-


5

• Experimental detection: C. D. Anderson (1932)

• Mass / Charge *): +5.685629(1) 10−12 kg/C

• Weight: ?

History

positron e+

*) Mass and charge separately can only be determined from theoretical derived results from experiments on composed particles.


6

Witteborn-Fairbank (1967)

History

51 peV

e-


7

History

LEAR / PS200 (anti-proton) (1982 – 1996)


8

Current at Cern


9

Current:

Athena, CERN (anti-hydrogen) AEGIS, CERN (anti-hydrogen interferometer) AGE, Fermilab (anti-hydrogen)

Current efforts for anti-gravity focus on neutral anti-matter


10


Reasons for not using anti protons / positrons:

• electrical forces by Surface potential patches Shift of the electrons in the tube due to gravitational forcesLeaking in at the end of the tube Possible off-axis movement of the particle

• forces due to magnetic fields• scattering on residual gas atoms• the low yield of eV positrons• questionable usefulness of its precision (1%–0.1%)


11

What about electron / positron anti-gravity?


Most objections can be overcome by using a

horizontal well shielded flight path


12

Principle:

xo

ge

gp

L

Vacuum tube

Detector

Source

xo

ge

L

Vacuum tube

Detector

Source

xo

L

Vacuum tube

Detector

Source

xo

L

Vacuum tube

e-e+


13

Principle including focussing:

xo

ge

gp

L

Vacuum tube

Detector

Source

Apertures

Lens

xo

L

Vacuum tube

Detector

Source

Apertures

Lens

xo

L

Vacuum tube

Detector

Source

Apertures

Lens


14

Requirements:

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1 10 100 1000

Kinetic energ / micro eV

Def

lect

ion

/ mm

L = 10 m L = 100 m


15

Requirements:

Based on wavelike properties of electron


16

Requirements:

Wavelike properties of electron givefocal spot from point source: Airy disk


17

Requirements:

Airy disk < Gravity deflection


18

Requirements:

Resolution limited

0.001 < < 0.1 Lower level: source strengthUpper level: paraxial approximation


19

Requirements:

Resolution limited

= 0.001

= 0.01

= 0.001

= 0.01


20

Requirements:

Surface Patch effect

Optical phase along a trajectory:

Refractive index as function of potential:


21

Requirements:

Gaussian distributed Surface Patch effect


22

Requirements:


Horizontal flight path (this proposal):

Vertical flight path (Witteborn & Fairbank):


23

Requirements:



24

Conclusions:

• With current technology the proposed experiment is perfectly feasible

• Largest challenge is the adequate shielding of the flight path

• Surface Patch effects have much less influence for the considered geometry

• Also the other reasons not to use positrons haveeither much less influence in this geometry or are not valid


25

Thank you for your attention !

Under partial support by The R. M. Santilli Foundation, Grant Number RMS-AM-4673rs82810

January 6, 2011ICLATIP-3 Kathmandu University Nepal 1 Proposal for the realization of Santilli's...

Documents

Transcript of January 6, 2011ICLATIP-3 Kathmandu University Nepal 1 Proposal for the realization of Santilli's...