its meee (3)

download its meee (3)

of 72

Transcript of its meee (3)

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    1/72

    1

    CHAPTER-1

    INTRODUCTION

    1.1 INTRODUCTION TO EMPLOYEE MORALE

    DEFINITION

    Prof.Mee,However, holds the view that good employee morale is the mental attitude

    of the individuals or the group,which enables an employee to realize that the maximum

    satisfaction of his drives coincides with the fulfillment of the objective with those of the

    company,and subordinates his own desires to those of the company.

    INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP MORALE

    Individual s morale is related with knowing ones own expectations and living up to

    them.if oneis clear of his own needs and how to satisfy them most of the time,his morale

    is height.individuals morale is a single persons attitude towards life.while group morale

    reflect s the general exprit de corps of a collective grip of personalities.

    FACTORS EFFECTING MORALE

    According to Mc Farland ,the important factors which have a bearing on morale are;

    The attitude of the excutives and managers towards the subordinates. Working

    condition, including pay, hours of work, and safty rules. Effective leadership and an

    intelligent distribution of authority and responsibility in the organization. The design of

    organization structurewhich facilitates the flow of work and the size of the organization.

    DETERMINATION OF LEVELS OF WORKS MORALE

    The organization itself

    The nature of the work

    Thelevelofsatisfaction

    The supervision received

    The perception of the self

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    2/72

    2

    Workers perception of the past awards and future opportunities for rewards

    TYPES OF MORALE

    High morale is represented by the use of such terms as team spirit.low morale

    on the another hand is described by such words and phrases as apathy ,bickering

    ,jealousy ,pessimism,fighting,dis loyality to the organization,dis obedience of the orders

    of the leader,dislike of or lack of intrest in,ones job and laziness.

    MEASUREMENT OR EVALUATION OF MORALE

    The indicators of morale are the various attitudes and behaviour patterns of

    employees,which have to be properly and correctly interpreted to determined the kind of

    organizational climate and mores which prevaile at agiven time. The most commonly

    used method for measuring are,

    Observation

    Attitude or morale surveys

    Company records and report

    Councelling

    WARNING SIGNS OF LOW MORALE

    Signs of low morale are generally not noticed till it is obviousely low or when

    something has gone a miss. By the time management reognises the fact that the morale

    has deteriorated,it is faced with one crisis or another.perceptive managers are therefore

    constantly on the lookout for clues to any deterioration in the morale of the employees.

    Among the more significant of the warning signals are the following

    High rate of absentism

    Tardiness

    High labour turn over

    Strike and sabotage

    Lack of pride in work

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    3/72

    3

    Wastage and spoilage

    1.2 ABOUT THE INDUSTRY

    HISTORY OF FOOTWEAR

    There is evidence , which shows that the history of shoe started in 10000 B.C .

    ie , at the end of paleolithitic period.painting of this time in caves in spain and in the

    south france make reference to foot wear.among the utensils of rock there caved several

    weapons that were used to scrap skin ,which indicates that the art of training is very

    old .in the Egptian Cypogeus (under ground chambers used to funerals),whose age is

    between six thousand and seven thousand years.painting were discoverd representing the

    various stages of the preparation of the leather and the footwear.In cold countries moccas

    is the protector of the feet and in hot countries sandal is still, the most used.the Egyptian

    sanduls were made of straw ,papyrus or of palm fibre.

    FOOTWEAR INDUSTRY

    Now a days wearing footweare is a necessity rather than a fashion for the

    human being.Hence the demand for the footwear is also increasing day by day.the

    different classes of people use different types and quality of footwears depending upon

    their purchasing power.the middle and lower income group prefer low cost,durable ,wear

    and bear resistant footwears that can be used in all domestic conditions where as the high

    income groups prefer the latest type of footwears which are highly costlier.The first

    preference of the middle and lower income group is the poly vinyl chloride (pvc)footwear

    ,which will satisfy all their requirements with regard to the footwear.

    Popularity of pvc chappal is increasing among the people and it will lead to thedemand for their chappals.As a result ,almost all footwear chappal manufactures are

    trying to shift their chappals from their chappals from rubber to the pvc chappals.

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    4/72

    4

    NEW THREATS IN FOOTWEAR INDUSTRY-DEVOLOPMENT IN

    TECHNOLOGYPVC footwear industry is capital intensive and changes of technologies in the

    market care too fast.Everyday ,new modes are entered in the market.Now an EVA

    technology based product has a trend in market.so many models have entered in the

    market by using his technology.

    INCREASING IN PURCHASING POWER

    Devolopments in human life caused to change their living conditions.If people get more

    income than earlier,automatically hat will effect their selection.This scenario affect the

    footwear also.Normal consumers of the pvc footwear may go to the leather type chappal.

    NEW TRENDS IN MARKET

    New version of pvc with synthetic leather supper model has good demand in the

    market.This sector has every hard competition in the market.At the same time so many

    new entrants have entered in to the market without maintaining sufficient quality in

    chappals.They provide chappals with in the price level of existing full pvc chappal.This

    fact will affc\ect theirexisting market

    NEW MODELS

    In any consumer product trend for new model is an important movement.Some

    may succeed and other may fail .some models become a fashion for season. This may

    boost existing model also.

    COMMUNICATION GAP

    Comparing to other product ,footwear is a well complicated product and so the

    margin is very low.The budgeted of funds towards advertisement is restricted up to a

    certain level because it will affect the price structure of the product.Majoriy of the

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    5/72

    5

    consumers are village people ,especially the working class,and hence to create an image

    among the group is so expensive.

    1.3 ABOUT THE COMPANY

    A BRIEF HISTORY OF CALIFER POLYMERS Pvt

    In malabar region,industrial devolopment were very low up to 1990s .Radiant

    mould and compound was the first pvc footwear unit in the region.Gradually kozhikode

    district has become the producers of 75% of footwear in kerala.In kozhikode kollathara

    a village in the district had great number of chappal company. Knpwing the scope of

    resin pvc chappal group of persons decided to start pvc manufacturing unit.They formeda private limited company named CALIFER POLYMERS Pvt Ltd with an auhorised capi

    tal of rs 36 lakhs.

    CALIFER POLYMERS Pvt. Ltd is a registered private limited company

    constituted in 1994 with the special objective of manufacturing pvc footwear.It is situated

    at Kakkencheri in Malappuram District near Calicut University.The place where the

    Calicut University is a beutiful an ideal place with regard to transportation facility.,water

    facilities,cheap labour etc.It is note worthy that the company has to got all helps from the

    government to start the venture.It has been registered as a small -scale industry.The most

    memorable day for the company was 16 th july 1995 ,when the production activiies of the

    company were started.Initially the installed capacity of the company was 6000 dozen

    pairs of chappals a year.

    But now it has been increased to 80000 dozen.The company has suffered a net

    loss of Rs 177800/- during the first year of operation and later it enjoyed profits only.

    The corporate mission of the company is to achieve and maintain customer satisfaction

    through sustained quality in the product and services at all times.In order to achieve this

    ,thecompany is taking care for the purchase of raw materials to the distribution of the

    product to the customers.The company is providing the footwear with 100% pure pvc and

    virgin material offering better comfort ,finish,colour,light weight and durability.The price

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    6/72

    6

    of the product is also reasonable.And by which demand for this company is increasing

    day by day in kerala.

    CAPITAL STRUCTURE

    The company started its operation with authorised capital of Rs 3600000/-.Along with

    this , it acquires a loan of Rs3300000/-.from Static bank of travancore,Calicut for

    working capital purpose.The capital of the company comprises the following;

    TERM LOAN

    The company availed a loan of Rs3200000 from kerala state financial corporation in

    1995 96.The loan was against the security of land ,building and machinery.The re

    payment of loan was made in monthly instalments and has to pay intrest at the rate of

    17.5% per annum.The loan was taken for 7 years and by now the loan amount has been

    repaid.

    MARGIN MONEY LOAN

    A margin money loan of Rs 100000/- was obtained from the District Industries

    Centre,Malappuram .The repayment of this loan was started only after 4 years and 3

    months from the date of loan taken. The interest is charged for this loan is at rate or 11.5

    % per annum.The entire loan amount was repaid.

    STATE GOVERNMENT SUBSIDY

    As an average the concern from has got from the state government 15%

    investment subsidy on the cost of land,building,machinery,equipments,which comes to

    Rs .100000/-.

    PROMOTERS CAPITAL

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    7/72

    7

    The company has the promoters authorized capital of 3600000 divided in to

    equity share of Rs .10/- each.Among this ,300000 share were issued and 3000000 is paid

    up.The company accepts the fact that the investors must get a regular return in both

    income as well as capital appreciation and believes in sharing the profit with its share

    holders.

    CHAPTER-11

    MAIN THEME OF THE PROJECT

    2.1 OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

    To understand how morale has an impact on productivity in Califer Polimers

    pvt,ltd.

    SECONDERY OBJECTIVES

    To measuring the determination of workers morale

    To identify specifically which type of morale effect productivity

    To identify how morale is related to perfomance

    To measure the effect of morale

    Finally to find as how morale is evaluated.

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    8/72

    8

    2.2 SCOPE OF THE STUDY

    The study is conducted for CALIFER POLYMERS PVT,LTD, targeted to

    employees as to find out the impact of morale on productivity for a periode of 3

    month

    Introduction with the various employees backed by the a structural questionnaire

    was the main source of qualitative data

    Initially the study required to really more explanatory research .the study also

    covers to the tools to improve employee morale inturn increase the productivity

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    9/72

    9

    2.3 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

    Time consuming is one of the limitations. in a specified time we must complete

    our project work

    Highly transportation cost are there, due to this we didnt take interview to all

    respondent

    During the course of investigation some the employees are non-co-operate

    Some particular questions in the survey confuses to respondents.so it takes as

    much time to analyses the respondents.

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    10/72

    10

    2.4 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

    Research methodology is a way to systematically solve the research problem it may be

    understood as a science of new research is done scientifically.A careful investigation or

    inquiry specially through search for new facts in any branch of knowledge

    RESEARCH DESIGN

    A research design is the systematic arrangement of ondition for collection and analysis of

    data in a manner that aims to combine relevance to the research purpose with economy in

    procedure.

    A research design is the logic framework or plan for study the guides the collection

    and analysis of the data.in this study the descriptive research is followed.

    DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH

    It includes surveys and fact-finding enquiries of different kinds.the major purpose of

    the descriptive research is description of the state of affairs as it exits at presnt .in social

    science and buisiness research we quite often use the term export facto research for

    descriptive research studies.at main charecteristics of the method are that the researcher

    has no control over the variables ,he can only report what has happened or what is

    Happening.

    SAMPLING PROCEDURE

    SAMPLE DESIGN

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    11/72

    11

    A sample design is a definite plan for obtaining a sample from a given population.it

    refers to the technique or procedure the researcher would adopt in selecting items of the

    sample.sampling design is determined before collecting the data.there are many sample

    designs.

    TYPES OF SAMPLE DESIGN

    CONVENIENCE SAMPLING

    This sampling methode involves a purposive or deliberative selection of particular

    units of the universe for onstituting a sample which represent the universe. When

    population elements are selected for inclusion in the sample based in the case of access.in

    this study the samples are taken on the basis of convenience sampling.

    TYPE OF UNIVERSE

    Clearely define the set of objects,technically called the universe .the universe can

    be finite or infinite. in this study the finite universe is used like as the total number of

    califer polymers workers is called as universe.

    POPULATION

    The population is selected from the Califer polymers.

    SAMPLE FRAME

    PARAMETERS OF THE INTREST

    The frame comprises of employees of the Califer polymers

    SAMPLE SIZE

    This refers to the number of items to be selected from the universe to constitute a

    sample.the size of the sample in this study is 125.

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    12/72

    12

    Some important sub-groups in the population about whom we would like to

    make estimates.in this study the Califer polymers workers are the parameters of the

    intrest.

    SOURCE OF DATA COLLECTION

    PRIMARY DATA

    The primary data are those, which are collected a fresh and for the first time. And

    thus happen the be original in character. The primary data has collected through the

    observation. The data relating to the different process and data regarding the salary of the

    workers and the development ideas, present changes, the current problem prevailing in

    the company and all the data are collected through the observation.

    SECONDARY DATA

    The secondary data are those which have already been collected by someone else

    and which already had been passed through the satisfacal process. Information for this

    study had been collected from the secondary data, like records, old report, journals and

    internet.

    MEASUREMENT SCALES

    Measurement scales are either undimensional or multidimensional.generally

    rating scale should be balanced,with in an equal number of favourable and unfavourable

    response.

    STATISTICAL TOOLS USED

    Simple percentage analysis

    The percentage analysis is obtained when ratios are multiplied by 100 so, one

    figure is taken as base and it is represented by 100.

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    13/72

    13

    Simple Percentage = No of respondents x 100

    Total no of respondents

    Chi square test

    Chi square method is used for difference between the some category and external

    training. Chi square is an important non parametric test and as such no rigid assumptions

    are necessary in respect of the type of population.

    As a non parametric test chi square can be used

    As a test of goodness to fit

    As a test of independence

    Formula

    Chi square = (O-E) ^ 2/E

    Where

    O= observed frequency

    E= expected frequency

    Degree of freedom= (D-1)

    Level of significants

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    14/72

    14

    2.5 REVIEW OF LITERATURE

    The purpose of the literature review was to determine what information is

    available on The relationship of morale and employee performance. Although the

    specific word morale was not used this text, the Successful Managers Handbook

    dedicates two chapters concerning leadership and motivational skills (Davis 1992). The

    authors express the need to foster teamwork, coach and develop others, and the

    importance of motivating others. This text was more of a self-help book that did not

    involve quantifiable data

    concerning my premise, but clearly the importance of a workforce that feels good

    about what they do is significant in the overall mission of any organization. Other

    publications reviewed included an applied research project from the National Fire

    Academy: Developing an Employee Moral Index in the Emergency Services

    Organization (Hunter 1997). This was an effort to index morale based on employee

    satisfaction. The following factors were constructed to determine employee satisfaction:

    Mean hours of sick leave taken 2. Ratio of refusals to acceptances to volunteer for

    overtime with pay. 3. Number of grievances filed in a given period. 4. Composite scores

    of job satisfaction 5. Mean performance evaluation scores. Each of the factors were then

    weighted and tabulated to determine the morale of the subject fire department. The author

    drew the conclusion that there was a strong direct causative correlation between high

    productivity and high morale and vice versa. Richard Arwood, a retired Fire Chief and

    renowned NFA adjunct wrote in an issue of Speaking of Fire points out the potentially

    most cost effective way in which a fire service can increase productivity is through a

    formal positive reinforcement program. In other terms highly motivated employees are

    more productive employees (Arwood 1989).Randy Novak, now director of Fire Service

    Training in Stillwater Oklahoma, wrote an article entitled Much More To Morale Than

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    15/72

    15

    You Might Think. This 1990 article appeared in the Minnesota Fire Chief magazine. In

    it, he mentions several of the external factors that influence morale that were listed in this

    research projects survey instrument.

    Listening, keeping people informed, encouraging participation, promoting a

    positive attitude as leaders are all cited by Novak as being effective means in responding

    to employee concerns (Novak 1990).

    Rodney Nordstrom of Nordstrom and Associates (a private consulting firm

    specializing in employee productivity) had the ominous task of rebuilding the morale of

    the Codes Administration for the City of Kansas City Missouri, following the tragedy and

    subsequent scandal surrounding the Hyatt skywalk collapse. Inspectors were thrown into

    the mix of corruption in expose that showed them loafing on the job. Nordstrom sites

    feedback as being the single most positive influencing factor in restoring the employees

    morale. He sites feedback as being effective in the treatment of all productivity concerns

    from accident reduction to increasing the number of inspections (Nordstrom 1985).

    BOCA Past President Gerald Jones took over the directorship of codes for the City of KC

    Missouri during this storm of controversy. He writes that employee productivity and

    morale were at such a low that he sought the advise and services of an outside private

    sector firm to help restore his agency (Jones 1985).

    In a June 1995 article in the publication Occupational Health and Safety Alan

    Colledge sites the example of the Union Pacific Railroad diesel shops increase in injury

    claims over a two year period. The employees felt that management cared more for

    production than for the well being of the workforce. A ten-member committee was set up

    with representatives from all sides of the issue. AIM, Attitude, Incentive, Morale was the

    name given to this team of individuals. The group empowered its employees and gave

    them a sense of ownership in the decision making process. The result was a dramatic

    decrease in injuries and a commensurate level increase in productivity (Colledge1995).

    William Ransom, President of Ransom & Associates (a management advisory firm)

    writes: The morale of a business allows it to accomplish more than its cumulative

    talents would suggest. It operates in a synergistic mode using management, employee and

    customer participation to resolve its problems. He further lists three characteristics of a

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    16/72

    16

    high morale organization: 1. Gives workers the freedom and autonomy to do their jobs. 2.

    Rewards the employee for exceeding expectations. 3. Listens to employees, and swiftly

    act to resolve any disputes. Ransom also sites that high morale organizations are more

    productive than the competition (Ransom 1995).

    Ben & Jerrys Ice Cream and Frozen Yogurt started out as a small company ran

    by two guys (Ben & Jerry) and quickly grew to a major player in the franchise industry.

    These admittedly simple guys soon realized that they needed the contributions of all

    employees in the decisions that affected these employees day to day. They attribute their

    success largely to the input from the employees into the decision making process. All the

    literature that was reviewed echoed a common theme: employee input is crucial to high

    morale.

    Elton Mayo ran a series of experiments from 1927 to 1932 to determine how

    changing the physical environment would impact production. These tests were dealt

    primarily with the lighting of the work area at Western Electrics Chicago Hawthorne

    plant. In a certain control group the test subjects continued to produce consistently even

    when the lighting was reduced to near darkness. This single control group knew they

    were being tested. Itwas later determined that the morale and motivation of the

    consistently productive control group was their impetus for production. This phenomenon

    would later be calledthe Hawthorne Effect (Fry 1989). Other public administration

    authorities concur with the findings of the Hawthorne experiments. In the textbook

    Organizational Theory: A Public Perspective these authors also concluded that the

    significance of the Hawthorne effect was not the lighting or lack thereof, subjected to the

    test subjects.

    These authorities concluded the following: the most important factor influencing

    the workers was not the physical environment, but the attitudes that resulted from the

    workers seeing themselves as important to the ongoing experiment (Gortner 1997).

    The literature all indicated that there is a by-product of employee input and morale and it

    translates into a more productive workforce. This literature review only served to further

    solidify my theory that an increase in the independent variable X, morale will provide a

    commensurate increase in the dependent variable Y, employee productivity.

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    17/72

    17

    CHAPTER-111

    ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

    CHI-SQUARE TEST AND ANALYSIS

    TABLE 3.1

    OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT AND SELF DEVOLOPEMENT VS

    RELATIONSHIP WITH SUPERIORS AND CO-WORKERS

    HYPOTHESIS

    H0 ; There is a significant relationship between opportunities for improovment and self

    development and relationship with superiors and co-workers.

    H1 ; There is no significant relationship between opportunities for improovment and self

    development and relationship with superiors and co-workers.

    OBSERVED TABLE

    EXPETED TABLE

    Very often Often Some

    times

    rarely Very

    rarely

    Total

    Very good 66.976 16.192 5.888 1.472 1.472 92

    Good 18.928 4.576 1.664 0.416 0.416 26

    Moderate 2.912 0.704 0.256 0.064 0.0674 4

    Poor 0.728 0.176 0.064 0.016 0.016 1

    Very poor 1.456 0.352 0.128 0.032 0.032 2

    Total 59 48 11 3 4 125

    CHI-SQUARE TABLE

    Very often Often Some

    times

    rarely Very

    rarely

    Total

    Very good 58 22 8 2 2 92

    Good 26 - - - - 26

    Moderate 4 - - - - 4

    Poor 1 - - - - 1

    Very poor 2 - - - - 2

    Total 91 22 8 2 2 125

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    18/72

    18

    O E O-E (O-E)^2 (O-E)^2/E

    58.000 66.976 -8.976 80.569 1.203

    22.000 16.196 5.808 33.733 2.083

    8.000 5.888 2.112 4.461 0.758

    2.000 1.472 0.528 0.279 0.189

    2.000 1.472 0.528 0.279 0.189

    26.000 18.928 7.072 50.013 2.642

    0.000 4.576 -4.576 20.940 4.576

    0.000 1.664 -1.664 2.769 1.664

    0.000 0.416 -0.416 0.173 0.416

    0.000 O.416 -0.416 0.173 0.416

    4.000 2.912 1.088 1.184 0.407

    0.000 0.704 -0.704 0.496 0.704

    0.000 0.256 -0.256 0.066 0.256

    0.000 0.064 -0.064 0.004 0.0640.000 0.064 -0.064 0.004 0.064

    1.000 0.728 0.272 0.074 0.102

    0.000 0.176 -0.176 0.031 0.176

    0.000 0.064 -0.064 0.004 0.064

    0.000 0.016 -0.016 0.000 0.016

    0.000 0.016 -0.016 0.000 0.016

    2.000 1.456 0.544 0.296 0.203

    0.000 0.352 -0.352 0.124 0.352

    0.000 0.128 -0.128 0.016 0.128

    0.000 0.032 -0.032 0.001 0.032

    0,000 0.032 -0.032 0,001 0.032TOTAL 16.752

    Calculate value :16.752

    Degree of freedom: (r-1)(c-1)=(5-1).(5-1)=16

    Level of significance:5%

    Significance table value=26.296

    26.296>16.752

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    19/72

    19

    Therefore H0 is accepted

    INTERPRETATION

    From the analysis it reveals there is a siognificant relationship between

    opportunities for improonement and self development and relationship with supervisors

    and co-workers.

    TABLE 3.2

    TOP MANAGEMENT APPRECIATION IN QUALITY WORK VS

    CONSIDERING SUGGESTIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS

    HYPOTHESIS

    H0: There is a significant relationship between the top management appreciation in

    quality work and considering your suggestion for the improvement of the company

    H1: There is no significant relationship between the top management appreciation in

    quality work and considering your suggestion for the improvement of the company

    OBSERVED TABLE

    ` Strongly Agree neutral disagree Strongly Total

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    20/72

    20

    agree disagree

    Strongly

    agree

    53 28 11 1 1 94

    Agree 22 - - - - 22

    Neutral 4 - - - - 4

    Disagree 4 - - - - 4

    Strongly

    disagree

    1 - - - - 1

    Total 84 28 11 1` 1 125

    EXPECTED TABLE

    Srongly

    agree

    Agree neutral disagree Strongly

    disagree

    Total

    Strongly

    agree

    63.168 21.056 8.72 0.752 0.752 94

    Agree 14.784 4.928 1.936 0.176 0.176 22

    Neutral 2.688 0.896 0.352 0.032 0.032 4

    Dis agree 2.688 0.896 0.352 0.032 0.032 4

    Strongly

    disagree

    0.672 0.224 0.088 0.008 0.008 1

    Total 84 28 11 1 1 125

    CHI- SQUARE TABLE

    O E O-E (O-E)^2 (O-E)^2/E

    53.000 63.168 -10.168 103.388 1.20328.000 21.056 6.944 48.219 2.083

    11.000 8.272 2.728 7.442 0.900

    1.000 0.752 0.248 0.062 0.082

    1.000 0.752 0.248 0.062 0.082

    22.000 14.784 7.216 52.071 3.522

    0.000 4.928 -4.928 24.285 4.928

    0.000 1.936 -1.936 3.748 1.936

    0.000 0.176 -0.176 0.031 0.176

    0.000 0.176 -0.176 1.721 0.176

    4.000 2.688 -0.176 0.755 0.640

    0.000 0.869 1.312 0.124 0.869

    0.000 0.352 -0.869 0.001 0.352

    0.000 0.032 -0.352 0.001 0.032

    0.000 0.032 -0.032 1.721 0.032

    4.000 2.688 -0.032 0.755 0.640

    0.000 2.869 1.312 0.124 0.869

    0.000 0.352 -0,869 0.001 0.352

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    21/72

    21

    0.000 0.032 -0.352 0.001 0.032

    0.000 0.032 -0..032 0.108 0.032

    1.000 0.672 -0.328 0.050 0.160

    0.000 0.224 -0.224 0.008 0.224

    0.000 0.088 -0.88 0.000 0.088

    0.000 0.088 -0.88 0.000 0.0080.000 0.088 -0.88 0.031 0.008

    TOTAL 20.067

    Calculate value;20.067

    Degree of freedom: (r-1).(c-1)=(5-1).(5-1)=16

    Level of significance:5%

    Significant table value:26.296

    26.296>20.067

    Therefore H0 is accepted

    INTERPRETATION

    From the analysis it results there is a significant relationship between top

    management appreciation in quality work and considering your suggestion for the

    improvement of the company.

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    22/72

    22

    TABLE 3.3

    OPPORTUNITES TO UPDATE KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS VS GOALS FOR

    ACHIEVEMENT

    HYPOTHESIS

    H0 : there is a significant relationship between opportunities to update knowledge and

    skills and goals for achievement.

    H1: there is no significant relationship between opportunities to update knowledge and

    skills and goals for achievement

    OBSERVED TABLE

    14 &15 Strongly

    agree

    Agree No

    opinion

    Dis agree Stromngly

    disagree

    Total

    Yes 67 26 13 4 3 111

    No 14 - - - - 14

    Total 81 26 11 4 3 125

    EXPECTED TABLE

    14&15 Strongly

    agree

    Agree No

    opinion

    Dis agree Strongly

    disagree

    Total

    Yes 71.928 23.088 9.768 3.552 2.664 111

    No 9.072 2.912 1.232 0.448 0.336 14

    Total 81 26 11 4 3 125

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    23/72

    23

    CHI-SQUARE TABLE

    O E O-E (O-E)^2 (O-E)^2/E

    67.000 71.928 -4.928 24.285 0.338

    26.000 23.088 2.912 8.480 0.367

    11.000 9.768 1.232 1.518 0.155

    4.000 3.552 0.448 0.201 0.057

    3.000 2.664 0.336 0.113 0.042

    14.000 9.072 4.928 24.285 2.677

    0.000 0.912 -0,912 0.832 0.912

    0.000 1.232 -1.232 1.518 1.2320.000 0.448 -0.448 0.201 0.448

    0.000 0.336 -0.336 0.113 0.336

    TOTAL 6.564

    Calculate value ;6.564

    Degrees of freedom:(r-1).(c-1)=(2-1).(5-1)=4

    Level of significance:5%

    Significance table value:9.448

    9.488>6.564

    Therefore HO accepted

    INTERPRETATION

    From the analysis it document there is a significant relationship between

    opportunities to update knowledge and skill and goals for achievement

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    24/72

    24

    SIMPLE PERCENTAGE& ANALYSIS

    TABLE : 3.4

    SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE PRESENT JOB

    S.NO Description N.o of responds Percentage

    1 Highly satisfied 30 24.00

    2 Satisfied 43 34.40

    3 Neutral 52 41.60

    4 Dissatisfied 0 0.00

    5 Highly dissatisfied 0 0.00

    Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATIONThe above table shows that41.60% respondents \are neutral. and 34.40%respondents

    are satisfied and 24% of the respondents are highly satisfied with the present job .

    CHART-3.4

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    25/72

    25

    SATISFACTION LEVEL OF THE PRESENT JOB

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90100

    Highlysatisfied

    Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highlydisatisfied

    percentage

    N.o of responds

    TABLE-3.5

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    26/72

    26

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE RECOGNITION OF THE

    ORGANIZATION

    S.no Description No of respondents Percentage

    1 Excellent 23 18.402 Good 67 53.60

    3 Moderate 35 28.00

    4 Poor 0 0.00

    5 Very poor 0 0.00

    Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The above table shows that 53.60 %of respondents are saying good and 28 %of

    the respondents are saying moderate and 18.40% of respondent are saying excellent about

    satisfaction with the recognition of the organization.

    CHART-3.5

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE RECOGNITION OF THE

    ORGANIZATION

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    27/72

    27

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    Excellent Good Moderate Poor Very poor

    Percentage

    No of respondents

    TABLE- 3.6

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH PAY OF THE ORGANIZATION

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    28/72

    28

    S.no Description No of respondents Percentage

    1 Excellent 33 26.40

    2 Good 57 45.60

    3 Moderate 20 16.00

    4 Poor 15 12.00

    5 Very poor 0 0.00Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The above table shows that and 45.60% of respondents are saying good and

    26.40% of respondents are saying exellent about satisfaction with the pay of the

    organization and 16% of the respondent are saying moderate and 12% of the respondent

    are saying poor.

    CHART-3.6

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH PAY OF THE ORGANIZATION

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    29/72

    29

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    Excellent Good Moderate Poor Very poor

    Percentage

    No of respondents

    TABLE- 3.7

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH PERFOMANCE OF THE ORGANIZATION

    S.no Description No of respondents Percentage

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    30/72

    30

    1 Excellent 37 29.60

    2 Good 41 32.80

    3 Moderate 47 37.60

    4 Poor 0 0.00

    5 Very poor 0 0.00

    Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The above table shows that37.60% of the respondents are saying moderate. and

    32.80% of respondents are saying 29.60% of respondents are saying excellent about

    satisfaction with the promotion of the organization

    CHART-3.7

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH PERFOMANCE OF THE ORGANIZATION

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    31/72

    31

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    Excellent Good Moderate Poor Very poor

    Percentage

    No of respondents

    TABLE-3.8

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH BONUS OF THE ORGANIZATION

    S.no Description No of respondents Percentage

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    32/72

    32

    1 Excellent 43 34.40

    2 Good 57 45.60

    3 Moderate 23 18.40

    4 Poor 2 1.60

    5 Very poor 0 0.00

    Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The above table shows that45.60% of respondents are saying good and 34.0% of

    respondent are saying excellent about satisfaction with the bonus of the organization and

    and 18.40% of the respondents are saying moderate and 1.60 % of the respondents are

    saying poor.

    CHART-3.8

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH BONUS OF THE ORGANIZATION

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    33/72

    33

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    Excellent Good Moderate Poor Very poor

    Percentage

    No of respondents

    TABLE-3.9

    ORGANIZATION HAVE BETTER MORALE

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    34/72

    34

    S.NO Description No.of respondents Perentage

    1 Yes 97 77.60

    2 No 28 22.40

    Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The above table shows that 77.60% of respondents are saying yes to organization

    is having the better morale and 22.40% of respondents are no.

    CHART-3.9

    ORGANIZATION HAVE BETTER MORALE

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    35/72

    35

    Yes

    No.of respondents

    Perentage

    TABLE-3.10

    WORKING ENVIORNMENT OF RESTING FACILITY

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    36/72

    36

    S.no Description No of respondents Percentage

    1 Excellent 42 33.60

    2 Good 58 46.40

    3 Moderate 19 15.20

    4 Poor 6 4.80

    5 Very poor 0 0.00

    Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The above table shows that 45.60% of respondents are saying good and

    33.60% of respondents are saying excenllent about working condition of resting facility

    18.40% of the respondents are saying moderate and 1.60% of the respondents are saying

    poor.

    CHART-3.10

    WORKING ENVIORNMENT OF RESTING FACILITY

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    37/72

    37

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    Excellent Good Moderate Poor Very poor

    Percentage

    No of respondents

    TABLE-3.11

    WORKING ENVIORNMENT OF SANITARY CONDITION

    S.no Description No of respondents Percentage

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    38/72

    38

    1 Excellent 42 33.60

    2 Good 58 46.40

    3 Moderate 19 15.20

    4 Poor 6 4.80

    5 Very poor 0 0.00

    Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The above table shows that 46.40% of respondents are saying good and 33.60%

    of respondents are saying excellent about satisfaction with the sanitary condition of the

    organization and 15.20% of the respondent are saying moderate and 4.80% of the

    respondent are saying poor.

    CHART-3.11

    WORKING ENVIORNMENT OF SANITARY CONDITION

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    39/72

    39

    No of respondents

    Excellent

    Good

    Moderate

    Poor

    Very poor

    TABLE- 3.12

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    40/72

    40

    RATING OF JOB RESPONSIBILITIES

    S.no Description No of respondents Percentage

    1 Excellent 52 41.60

    2 Good 48 38.40

    3 Moderate 13 10.40

    4 Poor 12 9.60

    5 Very poor 0 0.00

    Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The above table shows that 41.60 % of respondents are saying excellent about

    satisfaction with the job responsibilities of the organization and 38.40% of the

    respomndent arte saying good and 10.40% of the respondent are saying moderate and

    9.60% of the respondentsa are saying poor.

    CHART-3.12

    RATING OF JOB RESPONSIBILITIES

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    41/72

    41

    TABLE-3.13

    INDEPENDENCE TO EXPRESS YOUR VIEWS OR IDEAS TO YOUR

    SUPERIORS

    S.No Description No Of respondent Percentage

    1 Strongly agree 30 24.00

    2 Agree 43 34.40

    3 Neutral 52 41.60

    4 Disagree 0 0.00

    5 Strongly disagree 0 0.00Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    5060

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Excellent Good Moderate Poor Very poor

    Percentage

    No of respondents

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    42/72

    42

    The above table shows that 41.60% of the respondents are neutral. and 34.40% of

    respondent are agree and 24% of respondent are strongly agree with the independence to

    express your views or ideas to your superiors .

    CHART-3.13

    INDEPENDENCE TO EXPRESS YOUR VIEWS OR IDEAS TO YOUR

    SUPERIORS

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    Strongly

    agree

    agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

    disagree

    Percentage

    No Of respondent

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    43/72

    43

    TABLE- 3.14

    COMFORTABLE WITH THE POLICIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE

    S.No Description No Of respondent Percentage1 Strongly agree 49 39.20

    2 Agree 40 32.00

    3 Neutral 23 18.40

    4 Disagree 13 10.40

    5 Strongly disagree 0 0.00

    Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The above table shows that 39.20% of respondent are strongly agree to

    comfortable with the policies and administrative and 32% of respondent are agree and

    18.40%% of the respondent are neutral and 10.40% of respondent are disagree.

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    44/72

    44

    CHART-3.14

    COMFORTABLE WITH THE POLICIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Strongly

    agree

    agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

    disagree

    Percentage

    No Of respondent

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    45/72

    45

    TABLE-3.15

    TABLE SHOWING THE WORK LOAD

    s.no Description No of respondents Percentage

    1 Yes 59 47.20

    2 No 66 52.80Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The above table shows that52.80% of respondent are saying no and 47.20% of

    respondent are saying yes to work load .

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    46/72

    46

    CHART-3.15

    TABLE SHOWING THE WORK LOAD

    yes

    No of respondents

    Percentage

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    47/72

    47

    TABLE-3.16

    AVAILING LEAVE OFTEN FOR PERSONAL

    S.NO Description No of respondents Percentage

    1 Very often 53 42.40

    2 Often 37 29.60

    3 Some times 23 18.404 Rarely 12 9.60

    5 Very rarly 0 0.00

    Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The above table shows that 42.40% of respondent are saying very often to

    availing leave for personal.29.60% of respondent are saying often and 18.40% of

    respondent are saying some times and 9.60% of respondents are saying rarely.

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    48/72

    48

    CHART-3.16

    AVAILING LEAVE OFTEN FOR PERSONAL

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    Very often Often Some

    times

    Rarely Very rarly

    Percentage

    No of respondents

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    49/72

    49

    TABLE-3.17

    AVAILING LEAVE OFTEN FOR WORK STRESS

    S.NO Description No of respondents Percentage

    1 Very often 33 26.40

    2 Often 47 37.60

    3 Some times 37 29.60

    4 Rarely 8 6.40

    5 Very rarely 0 0.00Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The above table shows that.37.60% of respondents are saying often and

    29.60% of respondent are saying some times, 26.40% of respondent are saying very often

    availing leave for work strss and 6.40%of respondent are saying rarely.

    \

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    50/72

    50

    CHART-3.17

    AVAILING LEAVE OFTEN FOR WORK STRESS

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    Very

    often

    Often Some

    times

    Rarely Very

    rarely

    Total

    Percentage

    No of respondents

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    51/72

    51

    TABLE-3.18

    AVAILING LEAVE OFTEN FOR PROBLEM WITH SUPERIORS

    S.NO Description No of respondents Percentage1 Very often 28 22.40

    2 Often 42 33.60

    3 Some times 33 26.40

    4 Rarely 12 9.60

    5 Very rarely 10 8.00

    Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The above table shows that.33.60% of respondent are saying often and 26.40% of

    respondent are saying sometimes and 22.40% of respondent are saying very often

    availing leave for problem with superiors and 9.60% of respondent are saying rarely and

    8% of respondent are saying very rarely.

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    52/72

    52

    CHART-3.18

    AVAILING LEAVE OFTEN FOR PROBLEM WITH SUPERIOR

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    Very often Often Some

    times

    Rarely Very rarely

    Percentage

    No of respondents

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    53/72

    53

    TABLE-3.19

    LEVEL OF JOB ALLOWING TO BE CREATIVE

    S.No Description No Of respondent Percentage

    1 Strongly agree 47 37.60

    2 Agree 53 42.40

    3 Neutral 11 8.804 Disagree 14 11.20

    5 Strongly disagree 0 0.00

    Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The table shows that and 42.40% of respondents are agree 37.60% of

    respondent are strongly agree to their job allowing to be creative and and 11.20% of

    respondent are disagree and 8.80% of the respondent are neutral.

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    54/72

    54

    CHART-3.19

    LEVEL OF JOB ALLOWING TO BE CREATIVE

    No Of respondent

    Strongly agree

    agree

    Neutral

    Disagree

    Strongly disagree

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    55/72

    55

    TABLE-3.20

    TABLE SHOWING JOB CHALLENGES

    S.No Description No Of respondent Percentage

    1 Strongly agree 52 41.60

    2 Agree 48 38.40

    3 Neutral 20 16.004 Disagree 5 4.00

    5 Strongly disagree 0 0.00

    Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The table shows that 41.60% of respondent are strongly agree to their job

    challenging is enough and 38.40% of respondent are agree and 16% of the respondent are

    neutral and 4%of respondent are disagree

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    56/72

    56

    CHART-3.20

    TABLE SHOWING JOB CHALLENGES

    0

    10

    20

    30

    4050

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    Strongly

    agree

    agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

    disagree

    Percentage

    No Of respondent

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    57/72

    57

    TABLE-3.21

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE HEALTH

    S.no Description No of respondents Percentage

    1 Excellent 73 58.40

    2 Good 32 25.60

    3 Moderate 10 8.00

    4 Poor 10 8.00

    5 Very poor 0 0.00

    Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The table shows that 58.40% of respondent are saying excellent to level of

    satisfaction with the health and 25.60% of respondent are good and 8% of the respondent

    are moderate and 8% of respondent are poor

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    58/72

    58

    CHART-3.21

    \ LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE HEALTH

    Excellent

    Good

    Moderate

    Poor

    Very poor

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    59/72

    59

    TABLE-3.22

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE SAFETY

    S.no Description No of respondents Percentage

    1 Excellent 59 41.20

    2 Good 31 24.80

    3 Moderate 23 18.40

    4 Poor 7 5.60

    5 Very poor 5 4.00

    Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The table shows that 47.20% of respondent are saying excellent to level of

    satisfaction with the safety and 24.80% of respondent are good and 18.40% of the

    respondent are moderate and 5.60% of respondent are poor and 4% of respondent are

    very poor.

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    60/72

    60

    CHART-3.22

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE SAFETY

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    Excellent Good Moderate Poor Very poor

    No of respondents

    Percentage

    TABLE-3.23

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE SOCIAL SERVICE

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    61/72

    61

    S.no Description No of respondents Percentage

    1 Excellent 68 54.40

    2 Good 41 32.80

    3 Moderate 8 6.40

    4 Poor 8 6.40

    5 Very poor 0 0.00Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The table shows that 54.40% of respondent are saying excellent to level of

    satisfaction with the social service 32.80% of respondent are good and 6.40% of the

    respondent are moderate and 6.40% of respondents are poor.

    CHART-3.23

    LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH THE SOCIAL SERVICE

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    62/72

    62

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    Excellent Good Moderate Poor Very poor

    Percentage

    No of respondents

    TABLE-3.24

    SWITCH OVER JOBS WHILE COMPANY IS AT LOSS

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    63/72

    63

    s.no Description No of respondents Percentage

    1 Yes 97 77.60

    2 No 28 22.40Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The above table shows that 77.60% of respondent are saying yes to switch over

    jobs while company is at loss and 22.40% of respondent are no.

    CHART-3.24

    SWITCH OVER JOBS WHILE COMPANY IS AT LOSS

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    64/72

    64

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    No of respondents Percentage

    No

    yes

    TABLE-3.25

    LEVEL OF ACCEPTANCE TO GET LESS SALARY AND CONTINUE WHILE

    COMPANY IS AT LOSS

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    65/72

    65

    s.no Description No of respondents Percentage

    1 Yes 63 50.40

    2 No 62 49.60

    Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The above table shows that 50.40% of respondents are saying yes to accept get

    less salary and continue while company is at loss and 49.60% of respondents are no.

    CHART-3.25

    LEVEL OF ACCEPTANCE TO GET LESS SALARY AND CONTINUE WHILE

    COMPANY IS AT LOSS

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    66/72

    66

    yes

    No of respondents

    Percentage

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    67/72

    67

    TABLE-3.26

    INVOLMENT OF ORGANIZATION CHANGE IN MORALE OF EMPLOYEE

    BEHAVIOUR

    s.no Description No of respondents Percentage

    1 Yes 33 26.40

    2 No 92 73.60

    Total 125 100.00

    INTERPRETATION

    The table shows that 73.60% of respondent are no.and 26.40% of respondent are

    saying yes for want to make organization change in morale of employee behavior

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    68/72

    68

    CHART-3.26

    INVOLMENT OF ORGANIZATION CHANGE IN MORALE OF EMPLOYEE

    BEHAVIOUR

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    No of respondents Percentage

    No

    Yes

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    69/72

    69

    CHAPTER-1V

    FINDINGS , RECOMMENDATION,CONCLUSION

    AND SCOPE FOR FUTURE WORK

    4.1 FINDINGS AND INFERENCES

    CHI-SQUARE FINDINGS

    From the analysis it reveals there is a significant relationship between

    opportunities for impropovement and self development and relationship with

    superiors and co-workers

    From the analysis it document there is a significant relationship between top

    management appreciation in work and considering your suggestion for the

    improvement of company

    From the analysis it result there is a significant relationship between top

    management appreciation in quality work and considering your suggestion for the

    improvement of the company

    SIMPLE PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS

    The 53.60% of respondent are saying good with the recognition of the

    organization

    The 77.60% of respondent are saying yes to organization is having better morale

    The 52.80% of respondent are saying no to the work load

    The 58.40% of respondent are saying excellent to the level of satisfaction with the

    health.

    The 54.40% of respondent are saying excellent to level of satisfaction with the

    social service.

    The 77.60% of respondent are saying yes to switch over jobs while company is atloss.

    The 50.40% of respondent are saying yes to to accept get less salary and continue

    while company is at loss.

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    70/72

    70

    The 73.60% of respondent are saying no far want to make organization change in

    morale of employee behavior

    4.2 RECOMMENDATION

    Organization can make arrangements of exact pay in bonus where it facilitates the

    employee to work in better way

    Employee welfare facilities like resting room and sanitary condition can be

    maintained well. Health and safety measures also to be adopted in protection.

    Employee rating of responsibilities can be viewed in standard way and feedback

    can be provided to the employees.

    Organization has to develop the environment with proper outline of policies and

    procedures that prevail now.

    Work stress stays a factor f or absenteeism from observation , so organization can

    make employee feel to work in stress free by implementing any stress relating

    factor.

    Job specifications does not give any creative sense for the employees,so

    management can enrich the job by motivating with different constraints.

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    71/72

    71

    4.3 CONCLUSION AND SCOPE FOR FUTURE WORK

    The study employee morale and its impact on productivity has observed in

    Califer polymers pvt,ltd with conducting the procedures of various analysis where the

    research reveals that the over all morale in the organization is fair.but with small areas of

    low coverage like health,safety measures ,welfare facilities and stress factor has to be

    taken steps for better improvement.

    Organization employee morale is the major factor to determine the

    environment. Organization can take steps that make the firm to perform effectively in

    organization culture and better productivity.

    Finally I conclude that the employee morale have great impact on

    productivity in califer polymers pvt ltd. the positive morale help the concern to improve

    its productivity,and the negatve morale effect in negative way.

  • 7/29/2019 its meee (3)

    72/72

    72