Isospin symmetry in the sd shell: Coulomb excitation of 33Ar
Transcript of Isospin symmetry in the sd shell: Coulomb excitation of 33Ar
University of Cologne
Andreas Wendt
NUSTAR Annual Meeting
Darmstadt, 28.02.2013
• Isospin symmetry in the sd shell
• The Lund-York-Cologne-Calorimeter
• Analysis of the 33Ar Coulex-experiment
• Results and comparison to SM calculations
Isospin symmetry in the sd shell:
– Coulomb excitation of 33Ar –
and the new ‘Lund-York-Cologne-Calorimeter’
2221
ZNT
ZNtttT n
Isospin formalism
2/)( ZNTz
Proton und neutron: similar mass
and affected in similar way by nuclear interaction
D. D. Warner, M. A. Bentley und P. Van Isacker, Nature Phys. 2, 311 (2006).
tz(proton) = - ½
tz(neutron) = + ½
„nucleons“ in different states,
characterised by isospin t = ½.
1. Coulomb displacement energy
(shift of ground state)
2. Coulomb energy difference
between analogue exc. states
3. Isospin symmetry breaking (ISB)
effects of nucl. interaction
2+3 Mirror Energy Differences
Isospin symmetry
Mirror pair:
Nuclei with interchanged
proton and neutron numbers
e.g.
23
45
2222
45
23 TiV
M. A. Bentley et al., PRC 73, 024304 (2006)
Experimental data for sd shell nuclei
39Ca
37K
35Ar
33Cl
31S
29P
27Si
25Al
23Mg
21Na
19Ne
17F
38Ca
36K
34Ar
32Cl
30S
28P
26Si
24Al
22Mg
20Na
18Ne
37Ca
35K
33Ar
31Cl
27P
25Si
23Al
21Mg
19Na
36Ca
34K
32Ar
30Cl
28S
26P
24Si
22Al
20Mg
17O
39K
37Ar
35Cl
33S
31P
29Si
27Al
25Mg
23Na
21Ne
19F
18O
38Ar
36Cl
34S
32P
30Si
28Al
26Mg
24Na
22Ne
20F
19O
37Cl
35S
33P
31Si
29Al
27Mg
25Na
23Ne
21F
20O
36S
34P
32Si
30Al
28Mg
26Na
24Ne
22F
N
Z
23Si 22Si
21Al
25P
27S 26S
29Cl
31Ar 30Ar
35Ca 34Ca
33K
21O 22O 23O 24O 26O 27O 28O
23F 24F 25F 26F 27F 28F 29F
25Ne 26Ne 27Ne 28Ne 29Ne 30Ne
27Na 28Na 29Na 30Na 31Na
29Mg 30Mg 31Mg 32Mg
31Al 32Al 33Al
33Si 34Si
35P
29S
Energies / B(E2) known
Only energies known
No excited states known 16O
40Ca
38K
36Ar
34Cl
32S
30P
28Si
26Al
24Mg
22Na
20Ne
18F
Stable nuclei
N=Z nuclei
Excitation energies of Tz= -1 sd shell nuclei
16O
40Ca
38K
36Ar
34Cl
32S
30P
28Si
26Al
24Mg
22Na
20Ne
18F
39Ca
37K
35Ar
33Cl
31S
29P
27Si
25Al
23Mg
21Na
19Ne
17F
38Ca
36K
34Ar
32Cl
30S
28P
26Si
24Al
22Mg
20Na
18Ne
37Ca
35K
33Ar
31Cl
27P
25Si
23Al
21Mg
19Na
36Ca
34K
32Ar
30Cl
28S
26P
24Si
22Al
20Mg
17O
39K
37Ar
35Cl
33S
31P
29Si
27Al
25Mg
23Na
21Ne
19F
18O
38Ar
36Cl
34S
32P
30Si
28Al
26Mg
24Na
22Ne
20F
19O
37Cl
35S
33P
31Si
29Al
27Mg
25Na
23Ne
21F
20O
36S
34P
32Si
30Al
28Mg
26Na
24Ne
22F
N
Z
23Si 22Si
21Al
25P
27S 26S
29Cl
31Ar 30Ar
35Ca 34Ca
33K
21O 22O 23O 24O 26O 27O 28O
23F 24F 25F 26F 27F 28F 29F
25Ne 26Ne 27Ne 28Ne 29Ne 30Ne
27Na 28Na 29Na 30Na 31Na
29Mg 30Mg 31Mg 32Mg
31Al 32Al 33Al
33Si 34Si
35P
29S
Energies / B(E2) known
Only energies known
No excited states known
Known energies in
Tz = -1 nuclei
16O
40Ca
38K
36Ar
34Cl
32S
30P
28Si
26Al
24Mg
22Na
20Ne
18F
39Ca
37K
35Ar
33Cl
31S
29P
27Si
25Al
23Mg
21Na
19Ne
17F
38Ca
36K
34Ar
32Cl
30S
28P
26Si
24Al
22Mg
20Na
18Ne
37Ca
35K
33Ar
31Cl
27P
25Si
23Al
21Mg
19Na
36Ca
34K
32Ar
30Cl
28S
26P
24Si
22Al
20Mg
17O
39K
37Ar
35Cl
33S
31P
29Si
27Al
25Mg
23Na
21Ne
19F
18O
38Ar
36Cl
34S
32P
30Si
28Al
26Mg
24Na
22Ne
20F
19O
37Cl
35S
33P
31Si
29Al
27Mg
25Na
23Ne
21F
20O
36S
34P
32Si
30Al
28Mg
26Na
24Ne
22F
N
Z
23Si 22Si
21Al
25P
27S 26S
29Cl
31Ar 30Ar
35Ca 34Ca
33K
21O 22O 23O 24O 26O 27O 28O
23F 24F 25F 26F 27F 28F 29F
25Ne 26Ne 27Ne 28Ne 29Ne 30Ne
27Na 28Na 29Na 30Na 31Na
29Mg 30Mg 31Mg 32Mg
31Al 32Al 33Al
33Si 34Si
35P
29S
Excitation energies of Tz= -2 sd shell nuclei
Energies / B(E2) known
Only energies known
No excited states known
Known energies in
Tz = -2 nuclei
H. Schatz and K. Rehm
Nucl. Phys. A 777, 601 (2006)
24Si: H. Schatz et al., PRL 79, 203845 (1997)
28S, 32Ar: K. Yoneda et al., PRC 74, 021303 (2006)
36Ca: P. Doornenbal et al., PLB 647, 237 (2007)
20Mg: A. Gade et al., PRC 76, 024317 (2007)
MED for T=1,2 sd shell nuclei
USD*
‘Proton capture reaction rates in the rp-process’, H. Herndl et al., PRC 52, 1078 (1995)
A=24: H. Schatz et al., PRL 79, 3845 (1997)
A=28: K. Yoneda et al., PRC 74, 021303 (2006)
A=32: P. D. Cottle et al., PRL 88, 172502 (2002)
A=36: P. Doornenbal et al., PLB 647, 237 (2007)
Ad-hoc modifications:
Mass-dependent modifications
of SPE and TBME
Applicable for
T=3/2 mirror pairs?
B. A. Brown und B. H. Wildenthal,
Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 38, 29 (1988)
Y. Utsuno et al., PRC 60, 054315 (1999)
m USD1: USD* + exp. SPE
Violation of T-Symmetrie
H. Herndl et al., PRC 52, 1078 (1995)
USD*: USD + Coulomb WW
T-symmetric interaction
A=20: A. Gade et al., Phys. Rev. C 76, 024317 (2007)
16O
40Ca
38K
36Ar
34Cl
32S
30P
28Si
26Al
24Mg
22Na
20Ne
18F
39Ca
37K
35Ar
33Cl
31S
29P
27Si
25Al
23Mg
21Na
19Ne
17F
38Ca
36K
34Ar
32Cl
30S
28P
26Si
24Al
22Mg
20Na
18Ne
37Ca
35K
33Ar
31Cl
27P
23Al
21Mg
19Na
36Ca
34K
32Ar
30Cl
28S
26P
24Si
22Al
20Mg
17O
39K
37Ar
35Cl
33S
31P
29Si
27Al
25Mg
23Na
21Ne
19F
18O
38Ar
36Cl
34S
32P
30Si
28Al
26Mg
24Na
22Ne
20F
19O
37Cl
35S
33P
31Si
29Al
27Mg
25Na
23Ne
21F
20O
36S
34P
32Si
30Al
28Mg
26Na
24Ne
22F
N
Z
23Si 22Si
21Al
25P
27S 26S
29Cl
31Ar 30Ar
35Ca 34Ca
33K
21O 22O 23O 24O 26O 27O 28O
23F 24F 25F 26F 27F 28F 29F
25Ne 26Ne 27Ne 28Ne 29Ne 30Ne
27Na 28Na 29Na 30Na 31Na
29Mg 30Mg 31Mg 32Mg
31Al 32Al 33Al
33Si 34Si
35P
29S
25Si
Excitation energies of Tz= -3/2 sd shell nuclei
Energies / B(E2) known
Only energies known
No excited states known
Known energies in
Tz = -3/2 nuclei
Application on T=3/2 sd shell nuclei
R.R. Reynolds et al.
Phys. Rev. C 81, 067303(2010)
Next step: Measurement of 29S excitation energies with two-step-fragmentation: 36Ar→30S→29S+γ
PreSpec proposal: Jan. 2009
Next step: Investigation of transition strengths
B(E2) values for sd shell nuclei
16O
40Ca
38K
36Ar
34Cl
32S
30P
28Si
26Al
24Mg
22Na
20Ne
18F
39Ca
37K
35Ar
33Cl
31S
29P
27Si
25Al
23Mg
21Na
19Ne
17F
38Ca
36K
34Ar
32Cl
30S
28P
26Si
24Al
22Mg
20Na
18Ne
36Ca
34K
32Ar
30Cl
28S
26P
24Si
22Al
20Mg
17O
39K
37Ar
35Cl
33S
31P
29Si
27Al
25Mg
23Na
21Ne
19F
18O
38Ar
36Cl
34S
32P
30Si
28Al
26Mg
24Na
22Ne
20F
19O
37Cl
35S
33P
31Si
29Al
27Mg
25Na
23Ne
21F
20O
36S
34P
32Si
30Al
28Mg
26Na
24Ne
22F
N
Z
23Si 22Si
21Al
25P
27S 26S
29Cl
31Ar 30Ar
35Ca 34Ca
33K
21O 22O 23O 24O 26O 27O 28O
23F 24F 25F 26F 27F 28F 29F
25Ne 26Ne 27Ne 28Ne 29Ne 30Ne
27Na 28Na 29Na 30Na 31Na
29Mg 30Mg 31Mg 32Mg
31Al 32Al 33Al
33Si 34Si
35P
37Ca
35K
33Ar
31Cl
27P
25Si
23Al
21Mg
19Na
29S
Energies / B(E2) known
Only energies known
No excited states known
Known B(E2) values in
Tz = -3/2 nuclei
Tz= -3/2
SM calculations for B(E2) values of T=1,2 nuclei
Good agreement of all interactions for n-rich nuclei
p-rich nuclei: limited agreement, exp. very difficult
→ Comparison with T=3/2 nuclei
T=1 T=2
Blue: p-rich, Tz = -1, -2
Red: n-rich, Tz = +1, +2
Predictions from kockout differ: R. R. Reynolds et al., PRC 81, 067303 (2010).
Good agreement for n-rich nuclei
No exp. data for Tz= -3/2 nuclei
23T
21
23;2EB
Blue: p-rich, Tz = - 3/2
Red: n-rich, Tz = + 3/2
→ PreSpec experiment: Coulomb excitation of 25Si, 29S, 33Ar
SM calculations for B(E2) values of T=3/2 nuclei
21
25;2EB
S377 - Coulomb excitation of 33Ar
SIS – 36Ar, 450 MeV/u, 2·1010 ppspill
UNILAC 36Ar, 15 MeV/u
9Be 4 g/cm2
197Au 386 mg/cm2
Fragment Separator (FRS) 33Ar, 150 MeV/u, 30k ppspill
FRS id
33Ar
Target: Au
LYCCA
Tracked
ions from
FRS
EUROBALL
Cluster Array
Tracked ions
by LYCCA
Detected γ-rays
HECTOR
BaF2 Array
LYCCA – detection principle
RIB from FRS
Secondary
target
Time – of – flight
(ΔE, x, y) (E) (x, y)
Diamond
Plastic
scintillator
Plastic
scintillator
DSSD CsI
scintillators
DSSD
Event-by-event identification by
• Position → Tracking
• ΔE + TKE → Charge Q=Z
• ToF + TKE → Mass A
Needed for
• Doppler correction
• Selection of reaction channel
• Determination of scattering angle
Observables
33,36Ar (135-145 AMeV) on 386 mg/cm² Au
→ γ-ray spectrum dominated by background radiation
FRS detectors • βFRS
• θ FRS, φFRS
• A/Q
• Z
LYCCA • ∆Etar
• Ttar
• DSSDtar muliplicity
• ∆Ewall
• ECsI
• θ LYCCA, φLYCCA
• βLYCCA
EUROBALL • Eγ
• Cluster multiplicity
• Crystal multiplicity
• T γ
• θ γ, φ γ
Gates: FRS A/Q
LYCCA ∆E-E
LYCCA ∆E- ∆E
βFRS - βLYCCA
βLYCCA - ECsI
∆Etar - Ttar
T γ
Crystal-Multiplicity
Optimization: • DSSDtar multiplicity
• Particle gate optimization
• Time gate optimization
• Add back
• Background subtraction
36Ar %19/VV
2+→0+: 1970 keV
Singles + add back 12% Optimized γ-spectra
3/2+→1/2+ 36Ar 33Ar 2+→0+
5/2+→1/2+
Vol: 179.9 (18.3)
10 %
low: 74.9 (13.0)
17.3 %
hi: 127.6 (18.1)
14.2 %
• Optimized particle gates
• Optimized Ge-time gates
• Multiplicity conditions
• Add back
• Background subtraktion Reduction of relative error
by approx. 50 %
Singles + add back 12% Calculation of B(E2) values
• Efficiency calibration of the PreSpec setup with known transition in 36Ar: 2+→0+
• Correction for different γ-ray energies
• Correction for different ion velocity (Lorenz boost and scattering angle)
• Application of known 33Ar branching ratio
• Considering of feeding into 36Ar 2+ state
Nucleus 36Ar 33Ar
Transition 2+→0+ 3/2+→1/2+ 5/2+→1/2+
Lit. Exp. Lit. Exp. Lit. Exp.
Energy [keV] 1970.38(5) 1970(3) 1359(2) 1360(3) 1798(2) 1804(6)
B(E2) [W.U.] 8.5(8) --- --- 6.39(1.49) --- 5.80(1.62)
5/2+→ 1/2+ 3/2+→ 1/2+
SM calculations for B(E2) values of T=3/2 nuclei
• First experimental value in sd shell
• Comparison with SM calculation
Tz= - 3/2 nuclei with unpaired proton: only weakly bound
• Outlook:
Confirmation with further experiments
(S377-II and 21Mg)
Extension to pf shell (no exp. values)
Outlook – further Tz= -3/2 investigations
(5/2)+→(1/2)+
21Mg
25Si
29S
Complementary measurements
with stable beams:
• 22Mg (Tz=-1)
• 35Ar (Tz=-1/2)
• 33P (Tz=+3/2)
Summary
• A final PreSpec result
• Transition strengths in 33Ar measured
• Comparison with SM calculation
Further experiments recommended: 21Mg, 25Si, 29S
University of Cologne
Andreas Wendt
NUSTAR Annual Meeting
Darmstadt, 28.02.2013
Supported by the German BMBF (06KY9136 TP7+TP1) and by the "Helmholtz Graduate School for Hadron and Ion Research.
KÖLN
Andrey Blashev
Norbert Braun
Kerstin Geibel
Matthias Hackstein
Kevin Moschner
Peter Reiter
Burkhard Siebeck
Andreas Wendt
Jan Jolie
GSI
Frederic Ameil
Jürgen Gerl
Hubert Grawe
Tobias Habermann
Robert Hoischen
Stephane Pietri
Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim
Ivan Kojouharov
Niklas Kurz
Henning Schaffner
YORK
Mike Bentley
Dan Bloor
Nara Singh Bondili
Lianne Scruton
MILANO
Angela Bracco
Franco Camera
Fabio Crespi
Bénédicte Million
Anabel Morales
Oliver Wieland
LUND
Joakim Cederkall
Douglas DiJulio
Jnaneswari Gellanki
Pavel Golubev
Dirk Rudolph
MADRID
Andrea Jungclaus
Jan Taprogge
VALENCIA
Alejandro Algora
SURREY
Michael Bowry
Zsolt Podolyak
RIKEN
Pieter Doornenbal
KRAKAU
Jerzy Grebosz
Padova
Silvia Lenzi
Francesco Recchia
LYCCA
A. Wendt, J. Taprogge, N. Braun, C. Goergen,
G. Pascovici, P. Reiter, S. Thiel
University of Cologne
P. Golubev, R. Hoischen,
D. Rudolph
Lund University
M. A. Bentley, N. S. Bondili,
L. Scruton
University of York
F.Schirru, A.Lohstroh
University of Surrey
S377
PreSpec collaboration &
NUSTAR simulation group
TU Darmstadt
Plamen Boutachkov
Giulia Guastalla
Edana Merchan
Norbert Pietralla
Damian Ralet
Michael Reese