Name of Employee: CHRISTINE D. DAVID Name of Rater: PEPITO C. CELESTINOPosition: TEACHER I Position: HT IIIReview Period: MAY 2015 – MARCH 2016 Date of Review:Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT perKRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS(Quality, Efficiency,

Timelessness)

ACTUAL RESULTS

RATINGS SCORE

I – TEACHING – LEARNING PROCESS

1. Prepare daily lesson logs of activities including appropriate and adequate and updated instructional materials.

2. Facilitate learning in secondary schools through functional daily logs and innovative teaching strategies.

June, 2015-March 2016

10%

10%

5 – OutstandingAttained 130% and above of the desired learning competencies. 4 – Very SatisfactoryAttained 115 - 129% of the desired learning competencies 3 – SatisfactoryAttained 100 – 114% of the desired learning competencies. 2 – UnsatisfactoryAttained 51 – 99% of the desired learning competencies. 1 – Poor50% and below of the desired learning competencies.

5 – OutstandingThe goal reflected a range of student learner needs. 4 – Very SatisfactoryThe teacher explained the importance of the goal and its

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

3. Initiate discipline of students including classroom rules, guidelines and individual and group tasks.

10%

appropriateness to students 3 – SatisfactoryThe teacher clearly communicated a focus for student learning 2 – UnsatisfactoryThe teacher did not have a clear focus for student learning 1 – PoorThe objective is inappropriate for students.

5 – OutstandingLearners were 130% and above guided in the observation of classroom rules and guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card. 4 – Very SatisfactoryLearners were 115 – 129% guided in the observation of classroom rules and guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card. 3- SatisfactoryLearners were 100 – 114% guided in the observation of classroom rules and guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card. 2 – UnsatisfactoryLearners were 51 – 99% guided in the observation of classroom rules and guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card.

II – STUDENTS DEVELOPMENT 1.Monitor, evaluate and maintain

students’ progress

2. Maintain updated students’ school records.

June, 2015-March 2016

10%

10%

1 – PoorLearners were not guided in the observation of classroom rules and guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating in the report card.

5 – OutstandingClass record reflected the bases of 130% and above of learners’ ratings in all classes/subject areas handled. 4 – Very SatisfactoryClass record reflected the bases of 115 – 129% learners’ ratings in all classes/subject areas handled. 3-SatisfactoryClass record reflected the bases of 100-114% of learners’ ratings in all classes/subject areas handled. 2 – UnsatisfactoryClass record reflected the bases of 51 – 99% of learners’ ratings in all classes/subject areas handled. 1 – PoorClass record reflected the bases of 50% and below of learners’ ratings in all classes/subject areas handled.

5 – OutstandingStudents’ school records were 130% and above systematically

3. Adopt K-12 through a meaningful innovative and holistic development.

5%

carried out. 4 – Very SatisfactoryStudents’ school records were 115 – 129% systematically carried out. 3-SatisfactoryStudents’ school records were 100 – 114% systematically carried out. 2 – UnsatisfactoryStudents’ school records were 51 – 99% systematically carried out. 1 – PoorStudents’ school records were not systematically carried out.

5 – OutstandingTeaching methods and strategies elicited 130% and above interaction from a class. 4 – Very SatisfactoryTeaching methods and strategies elicited 115-129% interaction from a class. 3 – SatisfactoryTeaching methods and strategies elicited 100-114% interaction from a class. 2 – UnsatisfactoryTeaching methods and strategies elicited 51-99% interaction from a class. 1 – PoorTeaching methods and strategies elicited 50% and

III – PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT

1. Enhance the instructional competence for the successful implementation of the K-12 program.

2. Participated in activities such as teachers association, etc.

June, 2015-March 2016

5%

5%

below interaction from a class.

5 – OutstandingTeaching methods and strategies elicited 130% and above interaction from a class. 4 – Very SatisfactoryTeaching methods and strategies elicited 115-129% interaction from a class. 3 – SatisfactoryTeaching methods and strategies elicited 100-114% interaction from a class. 2 – UnsatisfactoryTeaching methods and strategies elicited 51-99% interaction from a class. 1 – PoorTeaching methods and strategies elicited 50% and below interaction from a class.

5 – OutstandingInitiated at least 2 co-curricular/school activities with documented results. 4 – Very SatisfactoryInitiated and participated in co-curricular/school activities with documented results. 3 – SatisfactoryParticipated in most co-curricular/school activities with

IV – RECORDS MANAGEMENT

3. Increase professional competencies.

Prepare/ file school records such as:

lesson logs class records grading sheet attendance sheets accomplishment repots

June, 2015-March 2016

5%

10%

documented results. 2 – UnsatisfactoryParticipation only without documented results. 1 – PoorNo participation in school activities.

5 – OutstandingInitiated at least 2 co-curricular/school activities with documented results. 4 – Very SatisfactoryInitiated and participated in co-curricular/school activities with documented results. 3 – SatisfactoryParticipated in most co-curricular/school activities with documented results. 2 – UnsatisfactoryParticipation only without documented results. 1 – PoorNo participation in school activities.

5 – OutstandingPerforms and represents extraordinary level of achievement

4 – Very SatisfactoryPerformance exceeded expectations

V – COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

1. Organize and maintain functional Homeroom PTA.

10%

3 – SatisfactoryPerformance met expectations

2 –UnsatisfactoryPerformance failed to meet expectations

5 – PoorPerformance was consistently below expectations

5 – Outstanding130% and above accomplishment with set agreements met. 4 – Very Satisfactory115 – 129% planned meetings conducted producing only set agreements and partial accomplishments of these. 3 – Satisfactory100-114% of planned meetings conducted producing set of agreements. 2 – Unsatisfactory51 – 99% of planned meetings conducted producing minimal results. 1 – Poor50% and below of planned meetings with no results.

2. Conduct periodic PTA meeting.

3. Support different activities of school.

5%

5%

5 – Outstanding130% and above accomplishment with set agreements met. 4 – Very Satisfactory115 – 129% planned meetings conducted producing only set agreements and partial accomplishments of these. 3 – Satisfactory100-114% of planned meetings conducted producing set of agreements. 2 – Unsatisfactory51 – 99% of planned meetings conducted producing minimal results. 1 – Poor50% and below of planned meetings with no results.

5 – OutstandingInitiated and participated at least 2 co-curricular/school activities with documented results. 4 – Very SatisfactoryInitiated and participated in co-curricular/school activities with documented results. 3 – SatisfactoryParticipated in most co-curricular/school activities with documented results. 2 – UnsatisfactoryParticipation only without

documented results. 1 – PoorNo participation in school activities.

OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLI - SHMENTS

To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

_______________________________________________ _________________________________________ Rater Ratee