IORHEMEN IORCHIR PETER - University of Nigeria
Transcript of IORHEMEN IORCHIR PETER - University of Nigeria
i
AN ASSESSMENT OF INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS FOR
COMBATING CORRUPTION IN NIGERIAN PUBLIC SERVICE
BY
IORHEMEN IORCHIR PETER
PG/M.Sc/10/57372
BEING A MASTERS THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT, FACULTY
OF SOCIAL SCIENCE, UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA, NSUKKA, IN
PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD
OF MASTER OF SCIENCE (M.Sc) DEGREE IN PUBIC
ADMINISTRATION (HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT)
DECEMBER, 2011.
ii
CERTIFICATION
This master’s thesis has been read and approved by the Department of
Public Administration and Local Government University of Nigeria, Nsukka:
--------------------------- -----------------------
Dr. B.A. Amujiri Date
Supervisor
--------------------------- -----------------------
External Examiner Date
--------------------------- -----------------------
Prof. Fab. O. Onah Date
Head of Department
--------------------------- -----------------------
Prof. E.O. Ezeani Date
Dean of Faculty
iii
DEDICATION
This project is dedicated to my loving mother Icher C. Iorhemen who past
away on the 30th
September, 2007, during her sojourn on this planet, she was an
embodiment of love, excellence, honesty and humility. Mummy may your gentle
soul rest in perfect peace.
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
It is with immense humility that I express my gratitude to God, for all his
mercies and enabling conditions to successfully complete this programme. All
glory and honor belong to God for helping me take far reaching decision and
remaining steadfast as I work my way sometime, the hard way to achieve success.
In the process of undergoing my programme I have benefited immensely from the
wealth of experience and financial assistance of people too numerous to mention
here. However I want to place on record my profound gratitude to the following
persons.
I acknowledge appreciatively the support of my articulate supervisor Dr.
B.A. Amujiri for his intellectual leadership, kindness and firm efforts in reading
through the manuscript and offering most valuable suggestions and contribution
which have certainly improved the style and quality of this work. The intellectual
build up by the Head of Department, Public Administration and Local
Government, Prof. Fab. O. Onah and all the lecturers in the department are highly
acknowledged. In connection with my field work, I would like to register my
profound gratitude to many who furnished me with much needed information. It
will be impossible for me to mention names without producing an extremely long
list. Suffice it to say that without their cooperation, this thesis would never have
been produced in its present form.
I owe a debt of gratitude to my dear father. Mr. Iorhemen F. Iangba. I thank
you for all the love, care and resources you sowed into my life. Also my profound
thank goes to my brothers and sisters: Mrs. Member Akpam, Mr. and Mrs.
Terhemba Iorhemen, Dondu, Mrs. Nguebur Hidan, Mr. and Mrs. Dooshiman
Tsekohol, Mr. and Mrs. Iveren Dondu, Torkuma, Miss Ngofa, Kohol, Ternerge,
Tervershima, Denen and Aondongu for their moral support and encouragement. I
as well, express my indebtedness to Sesugh Jem, HRH Chief Akpam Abeke,
Uncle Akpemlaham Agba, Dr. Atah Pine, Mike Ade, Stons Tarbunde, David
Yongo, Silas Ayaka, Akaha Gbeda and Ajayi Tsokaa as well as Datsu. They
v
readily offered me invaluable assistance. In fact, the persistence encouragement
and perhaps anxiety exhibited was the necessary tonic that kept on turning me on,
even when I was at the verge of “cease fire”.
I also thank in a special way, my wonderful friends: Emmanuel Hua, Tor
Zuama, Iorwuase Ajever, Mrs. Rita Terna-Makyur, Hon Mbatseem, Barrister
Cosmas Akigh, Chuksman, all my Class mates of M.Sc. 2010/2011 and my two
room mate David Agu and Kussa Terwase for their encouragement and support.
Finally, my eternal gratitude goes to Miss. Amechi Onah who took the
pains to type this work and other relations whose names could not appear here, but
have contributed in one way or the other. God bless you all.
IORHEMEN IORCHIR PETER
OCTOBER, 2011
vi
TABLE OF CONTENT
Title Page - - - - - - - - - -i
Certification - - - - - - - - - -ii
Dedication - - - - - - - - - -iii
Acknowledgement - - - - - - - - -iv
Table of Contents - - - - - - - - -vi
List of Tables - - - - - - -- - -ix
List of Figures - - - - - - - - -x
Acronyms/Abbreviation - - - -- - - - -xi
Abstract - - - - - - - - - -xii
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study - - - - - - -1
1.2 Statement of the Problem - - - - - - -6
1.3 Objectives of the Study - - - - - - -8
1.4 Significance of the Study - - - - - - -8
1.5 Scope and Limitations of the Study - - - - -9
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW AND METHODOLOGY
2.1 Literature Review - - - - - - - -10
2.1.1 Conceptual Definitions of Corruption - - - - -10
2.1.2 Types of Corruption - - - - - - -13
2.1.2.1 Political Corruption - - - - - - -13
2.1.2.2 Economic Corruption - - - - - - -15
2.1.2.3 Bureaucratic Corruption - - - - - - -17
2.1.2.4 Judicial Corruption - - - - - - - -22
2.1.2.5 Moral Corruption - - - - - - - -24
2.1.3 Courses of corruption - - - - - - -25
vii
2.1.4 Consequences of Corruption - - - - - -27
2.1.5 Control Measures of corruption - - - - -30
2.1.6 Identified gap in Literature Reviewed - - - - -31
2.2 Hypothesis of the Study - - - - - - -32
2.3 Operationalisation of Key Concepts - - - - -32
2.4 Methodology - - - - - - - - -33
2.4.1 Data Gathering Instruments. - - - - - -33
2.4.2 Validity and Reliability of the Instrument - - - -33
2.4.3 Population of Study - - - - - - -34
2.4.4 Sample of Study - - - - - - - -34
2.4.5 Sampling Procedure - - - - - - -34
2.4.6 Method of Data Analysis - - - - - - -34
2.5 Theoretical Framework - - - - - - -35
2.5.1 Public Choice Theory - - - - - - -35
2.5.2 Relevance of the Theory - - - - - - -37
CHAPTER THREE: HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF BEUNE STATE
3.1 History of Benue State - - - - - - - -40
3.2 The Development Potentials of Benue State - - - -42
3.3 Administrative Structure of Benue State - - - - -43
3.4 Socio-political and Economic organization - - - -44
3.5 Cultural and Religious Life of People of Benue State - - -47
3.6 Background Information on the Benue State Civil Services - -51
3.7 Functions and Structure of Benue State Civil Service - - -52
3.8 Environmental Effects on the Benue State Civil Service - - -58
CHAPTER FOUR: DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF FINDING
4.1 Introduction - - - - - - - - -60
4.2 Presentation of Bio-Data of the Respondents - - - - -60
viii
4.3 Test of Hypothesis - - - - - - - -72
4.4 Findings/Discussion - - - - - - -74
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION
5.1 Summary - - - - - - - - -78
5.2 Recommendations - - - - - - - -79
5.3 Conclusion - - - - - - - - -81
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDIX
ix
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4.2.1 Classification of Respondents According to Sex - -60
Table 4.2.2 Age Distribution of the Respondents - - - -60
Table 4.2.3 Education Status of the Respondents - - - -61
Table 4.2.4 Respondents Categories According to Period of Service -62
Table 4.2.5 Respondents Professional Group Categorization - -62
Table 4.2.6 Perceived Corruption in Nigeria - - - - -63
Table 4.2.7 Understanding of the Word Corruption - - - -63
Table 4.2.8 What are Considered to be the Main Causes of Corruption - -64
Table 4.2.9 Perceived Presence of Institutional Mechanisms to Combating
Corruption - - - - - - - -65
Table 4.2.10 Effectiveness of Agencies Fighting Corruption - -66
Table 4.2.11 The Rate of Corruption in Public Service before Establishing
ICPC, EFCC and BPP -- - - - - -66
Table 4.2.12 Perceived Current Level of Corruption in the Public Service
with the Establishment of Anti-Corruption Agencies - -67
Table 4.2.13 Transparency International Corruption Ranking for Nigeria -68
Table 4.2.14 Level of Autonomy - - - - - -69
Table 4.2.15 Level of Control over Staff of the Various anti Corruption
Agencies - - - - - - - -70
Table 4.2.16 Rating the General Performances of the Anti corruption
Agencies - - - - - - - -71
Table 4.2.17 Ways of Improving the Performances of the Anti corruption
Agencies - - - - - - - -71
Table 4.3.1 Computation of Chi-Value (X2) - - - - -73
x
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Organizational Chart of Benue State Government - - -50
Figure 2: Distribution of Staff by Pay Level. - - - - -54
xi
ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATION
ADC: Agricultural Development Company
AGF: Attorney General of the Federation
AUCACRO: African Union Convention Against Corruption Related
Offences.
BBL: Benue Breweries Limited
BENSESA: Benue State Environmental Sanitation Authority
BNARDA: Benue Agricultural Ruler Development Authority
BPP: Bureau of Public Procurement
BSRUDB: Benue State Rural Urban Development Board.
BERWSSA: Benue State Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Agency
CASS: Center for Advanced Social Sciences
CBCN: Catholic Bishops Conference of Nigeria
CBN: Central Bank of Nigeria
CCB: Code of Conduct Bureau
CSC: Civil Service Commission
EFCC: Economic and Financial Crime Commission
FRA: Fiscal Reasonability Act
ICPC: Independent Corrupt Practices and other Related Offences
Commission
MAMSER: Mass Mobilization for Social Justice Self-Reliance and
Economic Recovery.
SRT: State Reform Team
SSS: State Security Services.
UNCAC: United Nation Convention Against Corruption
xii
ABSTRACT
Corruption in the public service has triggers government response by setting up an
impressive array of institutions designed to curtail the malaise in the public sector.
However, these efforts have continued to fail. This thesis have taken a deep
assessment of institutional mechanisms for combating corruption in Nigerian
public service, given special attention to the Independent Corrupt Practice and
other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission (EFCC), Bureau for Public Procurement (BPP), and Code of Conduct
Bureau (CCB). The Objectives of the study is to find out the extent to which the
anti-corruption mechanisms has gone in the fight against corruption, ascertain the
efficacy or other wise of these institutional mechanisms, to identify the problems
militating against them and maker recommendation that will strengthened these
institutions. Data for the study were generated from both primary and secondary
sources. The instrument of primary data used is questionnaire while published and
unpublished text, form the basis of secondary data. Data analysis was done by
employing both qualitative and quantitative method. However, the chi-square (X2)
was used to test the hypothesis. The thesis revealed that, factors which constituted
obstacles to the various anti-corruption institutions are basically like of autonomy
and training as well as inadequate crime fighting facilities. Although the study
discovered that, the corruption fighting agencies has reduce corruption in Nigerian
public service to some extent, it went further based on these findings and
recommended among other things that, there should be explicit compulsory public
declaration of assets and liabilities of those holding statutory position in the
Nigerian Public Service; The anti corruption agencies should be given greater
operational autonomy; Some provisions of the various laws establishing these
organizations that constituted frustrators should be reviewed; Independent staffing
and continuous training; Broad range of integrated long term national and
international sustainable efforts and reforms which flow with social value re-
orientation.
1
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study
Corruption is a global malaise which has not been known to spare any
country in the world. This entail that, corruption is a common phenomenon found
not only in the developing countries and societies, but also in the so – called
advanced societies in Europe, America, Japan and Russia despite their level of
development. However, its depth and span of existence in Nigeria has created the
negative impression that it is indigenous to the nation. Corruption is a recurring
decimal in the Nigerian public service and to socio-economic and political
development of the country. Alabi and Fashagba (2010: 1) observed that, one
major challenge to Nigeria’s search for enduring socio-economic, political and
technological development as well as efficient and productive utilization of
allocated resources in the new millennium is the pervasive corrupt practices in the
polity. In a related view Ango (1986:9) stated that, “no doubt, corruption has eaten
deep into the fabric of Nigerian Society, so much so that, I believe it is at present
the greatest obstacles to national development” corruption appears to be seen in
some quarter as something worthy of accommodation. This Ogundeji (2000:7) put
across thus;
Corruption has had such a good run in our schema of things
that many compatriots are daily seeking examples to
authenticate why the madness may essentially be
accommodated as Nigeria’s peculiar cross, a defying trait of a
people.
Events in Nigeria have established without doubt massive waste and
distortions inflicted on the people and systems as a result of corruption. This is
evident by Achabe (1983:39) quoting the National Concorde and Daily Time of
Monday, May 16, 1983 that, “the Federal government is losing N50 million every
2
month as salaries to non-existent worker. In the course of one year the Nigeria
loses N600 million in this particular racket. With this huge amount of money
been drain away just for nothing, Achabe observed as at 1983 that;
With N600 million Nigeria could build more
international airport like the Murtala Mohammed
Airport in Lagos; or if we are not keen on more airports
the money could buy us three refineries, or build us dual
express motor way from Lagos to Kaduna or pay the
salary of 10,000 workers on grade level 01 for forty
years.
Appreciating the predicament the former President Obasanjo, in Shehu (2006:87)
stated that,
The impact of official corruption is so rampant and has
earned Nigeria a very bad image at home and abroad.
Besides, it has distorted and retrogressive development. Our
infrastructures – NEPA, NITEL, Roads, Railway, Education,
Housing and other social services were allowed to decay and
collapse. All these have brought the situation of chaos and
near despair…
Corruption does not operate in a vacuum but in a social context especially
in administrative sphere. Anugwom (1977), Nwachukwu (1987) and Achabe
(1983) have identified it as a cog in the wheel of the progress of the public service
in Nigeria. Indeed, in many ways it can be argued that the popular diagnosis of the
root of Nigeria’s political and under-development since independence is the fact of
pervasive corruption in public life. For example, when the Nigeria military made
its political debut by subordinating other organs of state to itself in 1966 the war
against corruption was core aspect of their raison d’etre. In his celebrated
broadcast of January 15, 1966, major Nzeogwu proclaimed inter alia;
3
The aim of the Revolutionary Council is to establish a
strong, united and prosperous nation, free from corruption
and internal… our enemies are the political profiteers, the
swindlers, the men in high and low places that seek bribe
and demand ten percent, those that seek to keep the country
divided permanently so that they can remain in office as
minister or VIP’s at least the tribalists, the nepotists, those
that make the country look big for nothing before
international circles, those that have corrupt our society and
put Nigeria calendar back by their words and deeds
(Ademoyega 1981:87).
Despite the corruption crusade of the military interventionists, they were
themselves caught in the web of corruption. Acknowledging the corrupt nature of
the military Dudley (1982:112) noted that, the effects of years of dictatorial and
corrupt governance by successive military administration are glaring manifest in
the poor state of development in all the sectors of the nation’s life especially the
level of poverty and low quality of life of its people, the oil boom, arising from the
sudden upsurge in the foreign revenue from the petroleum products exports fuelled
the growth of corruption under the various military administration. The military
has been blamed for allowing corruption to grow hydra-headed, stifling
development (Shehu 2006:87).
This situation is reflected in dysfunction of infrastructure and support
services, whereby funds available for projects are diverted to unproductive use or
embezzled. Corruption mostly occurs at the point of interface between the public
and private sectors, where there is a direct responsibility for the provision of a
desired service or the application of specific regulation or levies (Onuh, 2000:5).
In Africa corruption flourishes as luxuriantly as the bush and the weed which it so
much resemble, taking the goodness from the soil and suffocating the growth of
plants which have been carefully and expensively bred and tended. The forces
4
ranged against it are negligible (Wraith and Simpkins 1963:12). The level of
corruption which was observed by these writers about forty eight years ago is
mere chicken feed compared with corruption now prevalent in Africa in the recent
time. Corruption has grown beyond imagination and to a degree which boggles the
mind (Adebayo 2004:19). In Nigerian public service, corruption had played an
active part in stunting the growth of the nation. It is this that made the famous
novelist Chinue Achabe write in his thought provoking book, The Trouble with
Nigeria that, “corruption in Nigeria has passed the alarming and entered the fatal
stage; and Nigeria will die if we keep pretending that she is slightly indisposed.
The Transparency International Annual Corruption perception Index
(TIACPI) consistently rated Nigeria as one of the most corrupt, at one time or the
other the most corrupt nation in the world (TIACPI 2001/2002). The
acknowledgement of corruption constitutionally and judicially as one of the
foremost challenges to governance and development in Nigeria formed the making
of the “Anti-Corruption Campaign” as a fundamental policy of the former
President Olusegun Obasanjo government, that was established by the 1999
constitution (Ribadu 2006:1).
The country cannot but therefore respond to both domestic and
international pressures to confront corruption with all possible strategies available.
Although the need to provide the necessary mechanism for controlling corruption
has been recognized for a very long time, an ordinance to establish a criminal code
which made provisions against corruption by public officers was first enacted for
part of Lagos and the southern province in June 1916 (Nwakama 1986:185). The
need for anti-corruption machinery was also acknowledge fifty nine years ago,
February 26. 1952 to be specific by the motion moved in the Northern House of
Chiefs by the Emir of Gwandu;
The house agreeing that bribery and corruption are
widely prevalent in all walks of life, recommends that
Native Authorities should make efforts to trace and
5
punish offenders with strict impartiality and to educate
public opinion against bribery and corruption (Adebayo
2004:19).
Ironically, the institutional mechanism offered by constitution for fight
against corrupt practices in the country is itself not immured from the plague.
Indeed, the creation of extra-legislative institutions saddled with the tasks of
fighting corruption is itself an indictment of constitutional prescription and the
practical realities in an emerging democracy proceeded by long years of military
rule marked by massive corruption and rule with impunity. The Nigeria’s 1999
amended constitution contain several provisions geared towards good governance
and opposed to corruption. Hence, section 15 subsections 5- Political Objectives
of the Nigeria amended 1999 constitution say that “the state shall abolish all
corrupt practices and abuse of power”. Similarly, the economic resources of the
nation are expected to be exploited to promote the common good and to
decentralize wealth and the means of production in the interest of the majority.
These are supported by the enactment and judicial validation of accountability and
transparency augmented anti-corruption legislations, and the articulation and
vigorous pursuit of the anti-corruption policies by the successive administration of
May 29, 1999 to date. However, the nascent constitutional democratic government
grapples with the problems of governance and how to effectively combat and
prevent corruption, which has been ingrained in the Nigerian value system and
psyche as the “Nigerian factor” (Shehu 2006:105).
The Nigerian Public Service has inherent institutional mechanisms for
combating corruption. These include; the Civil Service Rule, Financial
Regulation/Instruction/Memoranda. The Civil Service Hierarchy, The Legislature,
The judiciary, The Public Complaint Commission, Auditor general’s Report and
Public Account Committee Inter-alia (Adamolekun 2006). However, these
conventional mechanisms have so far proven inadequate since corruption has
become systematic and endemic.
6
It is against this background that, the Federal Government of Nigeria
desirous of combating corruption and installing accountability and transparency in
the public service established an array of institutions in addition to the existing
conventional mechanisms. These include, The Independent Corrupt Practices and
Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) Act of 2000, Code of Conduct
Bureau (CCB) and its Tribunal Act of 1991 and enshrined in the amended 1999
constitution, The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Act of
2002 and most recently The Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP) Act of 2007 to
check wide spread of corruption, gross incompetence and related vices in public
procurement and service delivery to citizens. The BPP aims to block the loopholes
inherent in the reckless and dubious process that contract awards often involve and
to ensure compliance with guidelines and procedures laid down for procurement in
capital projects and associated goods and services.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
The negative perception of Nigeria persists in spite of the several emplaced
anti-corruption and integrity promotion policies and strategies by successive
administrations. Before the advent of the present democratic dispensation in May
1999, preceding regimes had successively instituted instruments, measures and
policies designed to prevent and combat corruption in the country, notably,
Criminal Code, Penal Code (applicable in the North), Corrupt Practices Decree
1975 (which established the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau), President
Shehu Shagari’s Ethical Revolution, War Against Indiscipline of the
Buhari/Idiagbon Administration, Mass Mobilization for Social Justice Self
Reliance and Economic Recovery (MAMSER) of the Babangida Administration,
Code of Conduct Bureau and Tribunal Act (Cap 56 Law of the Federation of
Nigeria, 1990), Recovery of Public Property (Special Military Tribunal Act Cap
387 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 1990) as amended in 1991, Criminal Justice
(Miscellaneous Provisions) Decree 1996 etc (Ahmed 2007:1). These institutions
have functioned less than adequately and result is institutionalized corruption. The
7
above scenario virtually turned Nigeria into a pariah nation. In foreign countries
Nigerians were treated with suspicion and embarrassment and foreigners were
wary of making Nigerian their investment destination (Iorhemen 2008:3). It has
been observed that, “the more government devise complex and ambitious ways of
combating corruption and plans for the socio-economic and political development
of this country, the more their implementation is frustrated by evolution of ever
more effective and sophisticated method of corruption so that in the end the only
development we see is the development of corruption” (Smith 1976) in Nkom
(1976:227). Amujiri (2002:68) observed that, public accountability is never a
priority in Nigeria. In spite of the brave letters of the constitution and the
expensive noise of the anti-corruption crusade….
The return of democratic rule in Nigeria in 1999 more than ever before
aroused the citizen’s quest to combating corruption and installing accountability
and transparency. Pursuant to this, the Independent Corrupt Practices and other
Related offences Commission (ICPC), the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission (EFCC) and Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP) were established
vide enabling acts. This is in addition to existing institutions such as the Code of
Conduct Bureau (CCB) and its tribunal. Why is it that, in spite of the
establishment of these impressive arrays of institutional mechanisms aimed at
combating corruption in the Nigerian Public Service, the vice still rife? The
rational for this study hinges on the fact that, it will contribute to strengthening
these institutional mechanisms for fighting corruption thereby, reducing the
malaise in the Nigerian Public Service. The questions that arose include:
i. Dose the established institutional mechanisms for combating corruption in
Nigeria has any effect on the level of corruption in the Nigerian public
service?
ii. How effective are these institutional mechanisms established in combating
corruption in the Nigerian Public Service?
8
iii. What are the problems associated with the effective functioning of these
institutions? And
iv. What can be done in making these institutional mechanisms more effective?
1.3 Objectives of the Study
The broad objective of this study is to critically assess the institutional
mechanisms for combating corruption in the Nigerian Public Service.
Specifically the study will:
1. To find out the extent to which the anti-corruption mechanisms has gone in
the fight against corruption in the Nigerian public service.
2. Ascertain the efficacy or other wise of these institutional mechanisms in
combating corruption in the Nigerian public service.
3. To identify the problems militating against the effective performance of
institutional mechanisms for combating corruption in the Nigerian public
service.
4. To make recommendation that will strengthened these institutional
mechanisms for combating corruption thereby, reducing the malaise in the
Nigerian public service.
1.4 Significance of the Study
The importance of this study is in two ways. In its theoretical
perspective, this research work would add to the existing literature on the issue of
corruption, it would contribute immensely to academic field of studies especially
in the area of human management. In addition, this work will be of benefit to
future scholars who would like to carry out research similar to or related to this
topic.
On the empirical perspective, policy maker will equally find the study
useful as it will enable them identifies present policy lapses with a view to fine
turning them. For the practitioners in these institutions and other administrators,
the finding of the study will provide them with more insight on the challenges of
these mechanisms with a view to re-adjusting their skills and methods of
9
operation. The acquisitive citizenry desirous of fighting corruption and seeing
transparency and accountability entrenched in the Nigerian public service will
equally find this interesting as it will provide them with a view to making
contribution, because the fight against it is a fight for all.
1.5 Scope and Limitations of the Study
The study is concerned on an assessment of institutional mechanisms for
combating corruption in Nigerian Public Service. The researcher is aware of the
fact that the Nigerian Public Service has similar feature in the Benue State Civil
Service as such the research is restricted to the Benue State Civil Service with the
time frame of 1999 to 2007. The period of democratic rule in Nigeria, and almost
all the institutions to be assessed were established within this period.
The researcher met the heads of the ant-corruption agencies in Benue State,
but they declined any form of interview, insisting that they needed clearance from
their headquarters before they could grant any interview or discuss their work.
Throughout the duration of the research, that approval never came.
Another limiting factor of the study is on the basis of sourcing materials
and information since materials in the public service are not accessible because of
the confidentiality of the information and fear of being quoted.
Irrespective of the limitation encountered, the researcher make vigorous
effort to assemble reasonable materials and information through some spirited
public servants who claimed to be contributing their quota in the fight against
corruption, because they were told about the objective of the research and what it
stand to achieve.
10
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW AND METHODOLOGY
2.1 Literature Review
There abound numerous literatures on corruption especially as it affects the
socio-economic and political development of the country. The researcher is not
trying to over flog, but review literatures that are relevant to the topic under
consideration.
The concept corruption is properly analyzed, their effects, on development,
positive and negative consequences as will as control measures are also
considered. All this wraps up with a theory to explain the phenomenon of
corruption and its eventual effect on the political system.
The literature is review under the following sub-headings:
Conceptual Definitions of Corruption
Types of Corruption
Causes of Corruption
Consequences of Corruption
Control Measures
2.1.1 Conceptual Definitions of Corruption
As real and pervasive as corruption is, it defies precise definition. Scholars
and practitioners therefore advanced different definitions of the concept based on
their orientation and social milieu. Transparency International (TI) (1999: 1,
2002:6), the world most reputable non governmental anti-corruption watchdog
define “corruption as the abuse of public office for private gain”. Otite (1986: 12)
see corruption as:
The pervasion of integrity or state of affairs through bribery,
favour, or moral depravity: when at least two parties have
interacted to change the structure or process of society or the
behaviour of functionaries in order to provide dishonest,
11
unfaithful or defiled situation, then corruption has taken place. It
therefore, involves the injection of additional but improper
transaction aimed at changing the normal course of events and
altering judgments and positions of events.
The definition offered by Otite is from a sociological point of view. It is not
particular to the public sector as those of Transparency international (1999 and
2002) and the World Bank (1997).
Amujiri (2002: 69) espouses the views of Nelken and Levi (1996) in
defining corruption as a term commonly applied to self-benefiting conduct by
public officials and others who are expected to be dedicated to public service.
Werner (1983: 27) who subscribed to the views of scholars like Alam (1989),
Mauro (1995), Naim (1995) and Johnston (1996) Categorized the definition of
corruption into three groups; the first group, public office-centered definitions,
which involve deviation from legal and public duty norms for the sake of private
benefits, be it for pecuniary or state gain or influence. The second group,
according to these scholars is the market-centered definition, which view
corruption as a maximizing unit, a pecuniary gains according to the supply and
demand that exist in the market place of their official domains. The third group in
the opinion of these scholars is the public-centered definitions, which emphasize
the betrayal of public interest by preference of particular or common interest.
Corruption therefore, is a social phenomenon which manifests itself in various
human actions, such as dishonesty, wickedness, selfishness, embezzlement moral
degeneration, bribery, insatiability, covetousness, and so on. Hence Momoh (1991:
115) stated that:
A corrupt act can be characterized by immoral but non-violent
action on the stronger party (the person in a position of authority)
to accept or on the part of the weaker party (the person in want of
favour) to give extra-official gratification in cash or in kind in
order to induce wrong or right action.
12
Accordingly, Momoh (1991: 117) explained that there are three levels of
corruption, not only in the Nigerian society, but in any other society. These are the
low grade, the medium grade and the high grade levels. These three levels of
corruption correspond to the three classes in society the low class, the middle class
and the high class. However, these classifications of corruption are also reflected
in the way and manner in which people carry out their official duties.
Corruption, according to Nye (1967: 419):
Is behavior which deviates from the normal duties of a public
role because of private-regarding (family, close private clique),
pecuniary or status gains; or violates rules against the exercise or
certain types of private-regarding influence. This includes such
behavior as bribery (use of reward to pervert the judgment of a
person in position of trust); nepotism (bestowal of patronage by
reason of inscriptive relationship rather than merit); and
misappropriation (illegal appropriation of public resources for
private regarding uses).
It is a behaviour that abuse societal legal or social standards as well as
public role or recourse for private benefit (Johnston 1991) in (Alabi and Fashagba
2010:5). Corruption exist where there is a diversion of government revenues and
notional income flow in order to augment the current entitled government officials
private wealth, when the latter is not legally entitled to do so (1999: 33). It
involves giving undue favorus to other people with whom government officials
have clientele relationship. In a related definition Idris (2008:7) noted the views of
Khan (1996:14) in defining corruption as “an act which deviates from the rules of
conduct governing the action of someone in position of public authority because of
private regarding motives such as wealth …….” The African Development Bank
Group (ADB) (2006:1) defines corruption as misappropriation of public assets or
public office/trust for private gain. Goyepa (2000) in Iorhemen (2008:16)
13
Identified two variant definitions of corruption, traditional and the political
definitions.
The traditional connotations of corruption involve the giving and
taking of bribe or illegal acquisition of wealth using the resource
of a public office including the exercise of discretion. The
political definition is any decision, act or conduct that was
perverse to democratic norms and values. It also include any
decision, act or conduct that subverted the integrity of people in
authority or institution charged with promoting, defending or
sustaining the democratization process thereby undermining its
effectiveness in performing its assigned role.
However, the above definitions squared corruption on the public sectors as
if it does not take place in the privet sector. It however fits well into the public
sector which is the concern of this study. From the foregoing, corruption can be
said to be the violation of norms either through collection and or offer of bribe, use
of public office or trust for private gains and or misappropriation of public assets.
The private gains could be economic, political, administrative or social.
2.1.2 Types of Corruptions
Otite (1986: 14) identified five major types of corruption in our society
which are defined by the spheres or arena of special activities and integrated by
the general principle of corruption these includes:
2.1.2.1 Political Corruption
The two areas in which political corruption is manifested are the activities
connected with election and succession, and the manipulation of people and
institutions in order to retain power and office. Political positions are scarce and
the prices of office are high. Hence the competition for such resource position
involves every possible extralegal means-through corruption-in order to over come
obstacles and opposition. Ugwu (2002: 21) asserted that, in this classification
14
(political corruption), one is really pointing at the style of rulership or governance
in Nigeria be it military or civilian. “Power is the fundamental concept in politics
………. In politics, therefore the principle attraction is to have access to power-the
ability to make things happen” (Ngwuoke 2001: 33). The Nigeria political scene
has shifted from doing well to the benefit of the state to that of self-centeredness,
egoistic tendencies, corruption and knavery. This was what Onyenwuenyi (2001:
97) summarized in the following words.
We Nigerians have suffered greatly since independence owing to
unstable government resulting in military rule for 28 years of 39
years of independence. During those 28 years, we witnessed heart-
breaking drama like “two million men-march” in Abuja and “5
million men-march in Lagos: the annulment of a democratically
conducted Jun 12th
election, adoption of General Abacha by the
existing political parties as a sole presidential candidate,
indiscriminate arrest of citizens who express their views on the
governance of the national military leaders Succeeding each other
on a competitive selfish interest, conversion of national crude oil
as enterprises of personal levels, sack of Nigeria from
commonwealth, closure of media houses by decrees.
Lending credence to the above view-point, Achebe (1983: 1) gave a graphic
picture of the threatening quantum of corruption that had gripped the country and
the consequent waste of human and natural resources. He said that, “the trouble
with Nigeria is simply and squared the problems of endemic corruption and failure
of leadership, the unwillingness of our leadership and personal example”.
Changes of corruption by “outsider” to government may be interpreted as
mere objections to exclusion from central participation in corrupt practices. This
partly explains why the replacement of political incumbents does not necessarily
eradicate corruption (Otite 1986: 14). Charges of political corruption have been
15
prominent in the explanation of coups in various parts of the world. In agreement
Ugwu (2002: 111- 112) contended:
Nearly ten years after the first coup, the late General Mohammed
gave corruption and general economic indiscipline and social
drift as the main basis for toppling the General Yakubu Gowon’s
nine years of military government. As if to believe that the
military are sincere interventionists and moral crusaders against
corruption, in 1983, that was about eight years after General
Murtala Mohammed coup, the Buhari led coup struck, bringing
to an abrupt end the second republic led by Alhaji Shehu Shagari
Crusade against high-handedness and of course economic
uncertainty formed the basis for the General Babengidas coup
against Buhari’s regime. The General Sani Abachas in-house
coup of November 18, 1993 which took over from Chief Ernest
Shonekan came to “redeem the image of Nigeria” and “Salvage”
her from economic mismanagement.
This has been the trend in most military coups and takeover government
either from civilian regimes or even military. But Nye (1967: 5) has rightly
warned; “we must beware of basing our beliefs about the cause of coups on post-
coup rationalization and also of judging the social consequences of an act from the
motives of the individuals performing it.”
2.1.2..2 Economic Corruption
Corruption in the economic and business world is commonplace
Businessman have been known to bid for faviours to any level provided the
economic cost of such faviours does not exceed the returns and the value made
possible . Collaborating, the economic corruption, the Central Bank Annual report
published on Sunday Puch July 2.2001, State:
The fraud steers are again on the prowl. This time, they are on
targets at banks vaults leaving over I billion Naira missing.
16
The culprits are no other ten bankers and other bank
employees who use their position to manipulate customer’s
accounts, suppress clearing cheques and steal foreign
currency. They also defalcate customers, cash lodgment,
forge transfer grant unauthorized credit and dry post friction
credits using computer. The banks credit reports that 723
eases of fraud and forgeries were identified. (Essien 2001:
18).
Nigeria as a nation is no doubt blessed with a lot of human and natural
resources but a few individual in power have bluntly refused to allow the larger
populace, the electorates, the hoi-polloi, the use and benefit of the proceed of these
resources. In this regard Oday (2001: 41) wrote thus:
Economically, the situation became so bad even in the midst of
plenty that for those who could afford it, there was apparently only
exit from the pervasive destination. A country which has been
blessed with an abundance of human and natural resources capable
of making in the pride of Africa was no longer able to provide daily
bread for its citizens because all that are needed to live and survive
were corruptly concentrated in the hands of the military vampires
that were sucking the blood of the nation.
This viewpoint is true as our leaders are themselves very corrupt and
continue to brandish before the poor masses the products of their loots from nation
economy. This has encouraged the helpless citizens to perpetrate the practice in
their own small measure thereby ruining the economy of the nation. In our market
s today corruption has been sown, watered and it has germinated. Thus Okwor
(2000: 61) observed:
In our market people now mix bad palm oil with red chemical
to make it look red. They mix powdered ground pea “Okpa
with Alibo and flour with ‘alibo’. While measuring food items
17
like beans, rice, garri for instance, the so-called “clever dealers”
use the bottom of the cup while the buyer looks on or away
without seeing. The buyer get home only to discover that the
twenty cups he paid for give hem seven full cups only.
He further noted that the dangerous trend in the forgery of some trade
names on the labels and corks. They also invent names similar to the original
products. For instance we have Bournvita in place of Bournivita or Bonita in the
place of Bouinvita. The unsuspecting buyer hardly looks at the difference of one
letter in the spelling on the one label or cork (2000: 61-62). Otite (1986: 14)
concluded in this respect that. In normal operation, business and entrepreneurs
dislike obstacles of profit-making and there fore use corrupt means to pervert the
normal institutional regulation, hasten or shorten procedures, or drew attention to
their out standing application, vouchers, bills or the like.
2.1.2.3 Bureaucratic Corruption
Bureaucratic corruption involves buying favours from bureaucrats who
formulate and administer government economic and political policies. The areas
chiefly involved are the acquisition of foreign exchange, import litical, industrial
establishment avoidance of tax and the like (Otite 1986: 14). In this connection
Oluwadere (1974: 10) in Idris (2008:10) observed that, “it is true that there are
many situation in which people may press bribes on officials thus tempting them
away from the path of probity: Oluwedare argues that in some cases officials
expect to be bribed for almost everything and that worse still, they use their
enormous power of delay to force people to bribe them: such bribe and corrupt
payment according to Leff (1964:8), are not legitimized by proper government
processes. Rather, they are appropriated by the bureaucrat, not by the state, and
they involve subversion of government political and economic policies.
18
In another dimension according to Ugwu 2002: 24 is that:
Salaries are deliberately delayed and at times denied, night
allowances, hospital bills, mileage claims, approved salary
scale, leave allowances are with-held. Sometimes they are
fixed in our banks for it to yield interests to individuals.
Also commonplace in the civil service is victimization
such as punitive transfers “sitting on ones file, sex
scandal, favoruitism such as employment to a brother or
village member, peer group, classmate, society or church
members, in laws etc.
Ugwu further argued that in the civil service, workers most often have their
salaries misappropriated, pension allowance and service money such as money for
water, electricity, telephone construction and maintenance of roads are never paid
.The strength of any government and the success of its development programmes
depend largely on an effective implementation of its policies by bureaucrats. In
this case, it becomes obvious that social development involves the efficiency of
the bureaucracy and the probity of bureaucrats. Anything else is a non rational
deviation from assigned task. Leff (1964) further observed that this chain and
logic, that is Development. Bureaucracy-Efficiency-Probity is central issue in the
critique of corruption.
It has been observed that the corruption of public office has existed in
Nigeria since the establishment of modern structures of public administration in
the country by the British Colonial Administration, however, its escalation has
coincided with the expansion of administrative structures and the full development
of the public sector (Ocheje 2001:174). The administrative structures development
has been accompanied with lack of transparency and accountability arising from
an over bloated public service that is bedeviled with excessive bureaucracy, red-
tapeism and corruption. Anugwom (2002:90) who differ significantly from the
modern structure perspective postulated that, the genesis of bureaucratic
19
corruption in Nigeria may be traced to the emergence of a Nigeria state which
adopted statism strategy like most African states as development strategy.
According to him, the statism strategy was well received at the onset of
independence as it provided a means of wrestling control of the commanding
heights of the economy from the westerners. Irrespective of the origin of public
sector corruption, the public service in Nigeria has been characterized by lack of
culture of accountability and weak institutional structure; excessive centralized of
administrative power, lack of access to citizens, and gross inefficiency
(Adamolekun 2002). These characteristic foster the practice of barefaced “theft
and stealing” of public funds and properties, waste and mismanagement of
national resources and public assets. The resultant effects of which has been the
phenomenon of inflated contracts, abandoned projects, lack f public
infrastructures, poverty of the citizens and the poor standard of living (Ocheje
2001;175). Attempts at reforms of the public service have been usually
accompanied by retrenchment of workers, reduction in the number of the
ministries and parastatals and changes in policies. However, these have not been
effective in checking corruption and corrupt practices, as the reform have failed to
address the fundamental causes of corruption in the public service.
Corruption permeates all facets of government institutions and structure in
Nigeria. In the public sphere, corruption in various arms of government appears in
various shapes. In the executive branch, corruption takes the form of over
invoicing, conversion of public properties to private use, inflation of contracts,
kick back paid to monitoring officers on contract awarded, distribution or sharing
of public resources as patronage to certain individuals to secure political support
(Alabi and Fashagba 2010:10). For instance, several allegation of corruption have
been alleged and some investigated against government officers, both the elected
and appointed members of the executive arm especially since the current returned
to democracy in Nigerian political spare in 1999. This is evidenced by the alleged
involvement in corrupt practices and subsequent arraignment in court of Professor
20
Fabian Osuji, a former minister of education (2003 – 2005) under Obasanjo
administration and Professor Adenike Grange, a former minister of health (2007 –
2008). Apart from ministers, several other administrative officers including
permanent secretaries and directors have been alleged and sometimes arraigned in
courts over charges relating to corruption. The arraignment in an Abuja high court
of the permanent secretary of the ministry of power along with nine others on 13th
and 18th
of May 2009 over financial impropriety involving the sum of N5.2 billion
naira rightly justifies this (The Nation, Tuesday May 12, 2009: P 1 – 2).
In every level of executive arm of government in Nigeria, incompetent and,
in extreme cases, non-existent construction engineering companies may be
awarded contracts for the purpose of siphoning funds from the public purse. In fact
security vote was (and is) often considered as part of the personal emolument of
the chief executive of the state or local government (Alabi and Fashagba 2010:11).
In the legislative organ, even though accountability is largely expected to
be facilitated through scrutiny of administration, the legislature appeared
concerned with the material and financial benefits it could amass using its office
and power. Appreciating the inability of the legislature to ensure transparency and
accountability Alabi and Fashagba (2010:27) note that,
The legislature has exhibited incapability in ensuring transparent
and accountable government. This is demonstrated in lack of
interest to scrutinize the audited account of the federation on the
floor of the house since 1999.
By this, despite some sporadic public hearings on certain activities of
government and some of its agencies, especially between 1999 and 2010 the
legislature has been lethargic in holding government to account by scrutinizing
public spending. The legislature has been home to series of scandals bordering on
financial impropriety. The incident of scandals in the legislature has resulted in
the removal of at least three Senate Presidents and two Speakers of the House of
Representative between 1999 and 2009 (Bello Imam, 2005; Global Integrity
21
2004). The disturbing dimensions of scandals in the Nigeria National Assembly,
especially the one involving a former Senate President, Senator Adolphus Wabara
(2003 -2005), prompted the former President Olusegun Obasanjo to assert that, “it
is disheartening that the number three man in the government hierarch in the
country is involved in this sordid matter (USA/Africa Dialogue, 2005). Perhaps,
more than any other reason, the high profile scandals that a large number of
members of the assembly have been involved in, appeared to have undermined
and indeed crippled the capacity of the assembly to serve as anti-corruption agent
Illegal funding of legislative committee’s activities by government departments
and agencies was another means by which the legislators extracted money from
government ministries or agencies over which they have responsibility to
oversight. For instance, the scandal in the ministry of Health in 2008 in which
minister of Health Professor Adenike Grange and Senator Iyabo-Bello Obasanjo,
chairman, senate committee on Health among others were alleged to have shared
the unspent part of the 2007 budget. Senator Iyabo-Bello Obasanjo had pointed
out that the money was collected to fund an official trip to Ghana in April 2008
(Saturday Tribune, 24th
May 2008:39).
Between 1999 and 2010 different forms of corrupt practices involving both
principal officers and members of the two chambers have been experienced. Often
the ministries over which committees of the two houses have oversight
responsibilities are taking advantage to extort money or other material benefit
(SGF bars ministries from funding National Assembly’s activities, 2008)
(Monday, The Punch, 19 May 2008:1). In the various legislative houses, bills are
not passed on their merits. Rather what governs the passing of bills is the readiness
of the executive to grease the palms of the so called legislators. Federal and annual
budgets stay for months before they are passed by the lawmakers because of one
form of lobbying or the other (Ezeme 2002:264). This attitude has crippling effect
in the fight against corruption. consequently, rather than scrutinizing
administration to ensure prudence in the utility of appropriated resource and
22
ensuring compliance with set rules among the implementing agencies and
departments of government, legislature has, through lack of self restraint,
mortgaged its moral basis to demand transparency and accountability.
2.1.2.4 Judicial Corruption
Allegations of corruption are rife against law enforcement agencies and the
courts. According to Amujiri (2002:76) corruption is equally rampant in the
judiciary. The administrative arm of the judiciary is the most corrupt. Judicial
corruption plays on the relative position of buyers in the social structure and use of
wealth to secure police attention and bails and even to prevent the administration
of justice. A shameful revelation by Agbeje (2008:8) in Ezeme (2002:262) is that;
There have been incident of judges refusing to give expert order or
interlocutory orders in matter of grave urgency unless gratified.
Existing orders have been wantonly vacated under highly
questionable judicial authorities. Some chief judges are more pro-
executive than dispensing impartial justice.
Amujiri (2002:76) who collaborated with the above quotation stated that;
Every step in filing, processing and assessing an application or in
getting a court order executed or obtaining a copy of a ruling
involves money. A legal practitioner going to file an application in
court knows that he has to take some extra money which he knows
will be vital to lubricate and ensure that his paper receives prompt
attention.
The accusation of long-scale corruption among the electoral tribunals
adjudicating over series of electoral disputes has dented the image of the Nigeria
judiciary. Many have often doubted the objectivity and neutrality of most Nigerian
judges who are perceived as corrupt and often subvert justice (Alabi and Fashagba
2010:13). By this, court rulings are occasionally believed to go the way of highest
23
bidder. This must have prompted one of the legal luminaries, Justice Chukwudifu
Oputa to make the following declaration;
Corruption is the greatest melody to affect any court system,
for the court is our human attempts to attain justice through the
law. Justice in our courts should never become a marketable
commodity blatantly auctioned with the hammer going down to
the highest bidder. Our judges should realize that it is not for
fun that they are addressed as Honorable Justice, so, so, and so.
They should also realize that justice is an attribute of God
Himself (Ogiri 2004:14) in (Anyebe 2007:58).
The judiciary is incapable of providing fairness and justice, thereby
rendering the innocents helpless and such development is ugly for the dispensation
of justice.
Another public area of concerned which is non-governmental in nature that
has engulfed with corruption is the religion arena. Acknowledging the existence of
corruption within the religious organization, the Catholic Bishops Conference of
Nigeria (CBCN) in a communiqué issued at the end of their assembly in 2000. The
Bishop said,
We are painfully aware that corruption has eaten deep into the
ever fabric of the Nigerian society. It has become so pervasive
that many now accept it as the “Nigerian Factor” when they
mean corruption has passes for official policy in both the public
and private sector of our national life. The socio-economic and
political system itself appears to be built on corruption and
thrives in it. Even the church and other religious organization are
themselves not completely free from corruption (Ezeme
2002:266).
24
One should not be surprised about the presence of corruption in the
churches and mosques because their members are Nigerians who must behave like
Nigeria wherever they find themselves especially as many of them have been
indigenized. In fact we are at the stage where ever body is seen as corrupt (Amujiri
2002:77). This assertion is in agreement with the views of the Weekly Star of May
15, 1983, that, keeping an average Nigerian from being corrupt is like keeping a
goat from eating yam. Although the assertion was rejected by Achabe (1983:38)
stating that;
A goat needs yam because yam is food for goats. A Nigerian
does not need corruption; nether is corruption necessary
nourishment for Nigerians.
Also in disagreement with the assumption that religious members are Nigerians
and most behave like Nigerians which seems to suggest that corruption is inherent
and quite inevitable in the nature of Nigerians Achabe (1983:38) noted that;
It is totally false to suggest, as we opt to do that Nigerians are
different fundamentally from any other people in the world.
Nigerians are corrupt because the system under which they live
today makes corruption easy and profitable, they will cease to
be corrupt when corruption is made difficult and inconvenient.
If there is nothing fundamentally wrong with the nature and concept of
Nigerians, which make them corrupt or have consistent flair for corruption, then
Nigerians cannot be exceptional in the world since they are not naturally and
fundamentally different from other human beings.
2.1.2.5 Moral Corruption
The anonymity in contemporary societies, particularly in urban and
cosmopolitan centres, has worsened, or in some cases only created, conditions
which favour moral depravity. The desire for employment, the wish to show
wealth through the acquisition of women, the flamboyant demonstration of
25
individual materialistic possession in the midst of social poverty, and the
exploitation of man by man-the powerless poor by the powerful rich, etc. all
belong to the type of moral corruption. The implication of criticism here is that the
possession of wealth is right only when it is employed to serve the needs of
society and its members, and lust, incest, avarice, covetousness etc are abhorred in
society. Yet the question is; what society do we expect to produce such
“puritans”? There is so much self-interest and greed in our society that the
political rules and top bureaucrat flout public moral code, and indeed out top elite
are generally morally vulnerable.
2.1.3 Causes of Corruption
If corruption is such a part of our society and development process, we
must identify its causes. Lord Brgce (1921) quote in Nye (1967: 418) has aptly
summarized these causes as they affect countries like Nigeria. He states that
behaviour that will be considered corrupt is likely to be more prominent in less
developed countries because of a variety of conditions involved in their
underdevelopment great inequality in the distribution of wealth: political office as
the primary means of gaining access to wealth; conflict between changing moral
codes; the weakness of social and governmental enforcement mechanisms, and the
absence of a strong sense of national community.
Aboyede (1971: 4) also discussed the above cause of corruptions, submitted
that:
In own contexts, the time lay between new regulation and
enforcement, and the loopholes discovered in laws and
rules, create conditions for corrupt practices. Also where
people use their wealth to buy political power or to occupy
formal or informal positions of political infancy there is
often a desire to corruptly replenish spend wealth and to
reconvert such a political position to an economic resource.
26
He further agued that, citizens are prone to be corrupt in a system such as
ours where the fact of being wealth is acclaimed, accepted and respected, without
an examination of the means by which such wealth was acquired. Amujiri (2002:
70 - 71), listed factors responsible for ever-increasing cases of corruption in the
public service to include poor wages, quest for flamboyant life, societal influence,
and cost of living.
Equally germane to the substanace of corruption even in the developed
nations of the world is the extent of economic opportunities available to the
people. In this regards Anugwom (2002: 91) asserted that, in places where
economic opportunities are low or where there exists severe economic hardship,
corruption may crop up as a means of augmenting what is legally possible. He
further observed that, in the case of Nigeria, a combination of years of economic
headship and a limited compensation package for public officers may have
increased the pressure to indulge in corruption. In this case public office holders
and civil servants may have exploited their positions in the bid to improve their
total benefits in the face of a severely limited compensation package.
Some writers have seen corruption especially in public officers or
bureaucracies as resulting, in the case of the developing countries, from
modernization and development (Alam, 1989: 48; Baley, 1966: 19). The argument
is that the contradiction or clash between traditional values and modern norms
invariably breed corruption. Despite the modernization theory leaning of this
argument which makes it suspect, evidence would reveal that in the so-called
traditional societies, public offices were often compromised in the pursuit of
private gains. Actually, the word “awuf” has been used in capturing this form of
compromise in the pre-colonial Nigerian Society (Amadi, 1982: 6). But this
should not be interpreted as a disavowal of the likely heightening of corrupt
practices with the monetization of the economy in contemporary Nigerian society
(Anugwom 2002: 92).
27
One obvious reason according to Anugwom (2002) for escalating
bureaucratic corruption in Nigeria may be the inability of the leaders to deal with
the problem even when the perpetrators are identified. In a related view, African
Development Bank (ADB) (2006) argues, corrupt practices becomes the
exemption rather than the norm if the likelihood of being caught is high, if the
consequence once caught is predictable and severe, and if it is generally
condemned by society. The ADB summarizes the dynamics of public sector
corruption, using a simple model: C = M + D – A; when C is corruption, M is
monopoly, D is discretion and A is Accountability. That is, corruption =
Monopoly + Discretion – Accountability. Under this model, a public servant is
assumed to have monopoly power over a good or service which generates
economic rent, and has the discretion to decide who will acquire it, that is,
determining who rent is distributed, and is not accountable for his/her action. This
is typical of military regimes, that had dominated the Nigeria political scene
(Ribadu; 2006: 5) and politicians elected into political offices. This they perpetrate
with the aid of career officers (Idris 2008:8).
2.1.4 Consequences of Corruption
The effects of corruption in the Nigerian public service are diverse and
excruciating especially on the poor and the vulnerable. It affects all facets of our
national life (security health, education, economic, political etc) and as African
Diaspora Initiative (2007: 3) asserts:
In the political realm, it undermines democracy and the
legitimacy of government by subverting formal process. In so
doing, it reduces seriously the trust and confidence of people
in their institution. Corruption in election and in legislative
bodies reduces accountability and representation in policy
making. Provision of services it undermines economic
28
development in a variety of ways of creating distortions,
inefficiencies and deviating resources.
According to Caiden (1976) quoted in Amujiri (2002: 78) corruption
involves loss of moral authority, weakens efficiency of government operation,
increases opportunities for organized crime, encourages police brutality, adds to
tax payers burden, undermines political decision, lead to insufficient use of
resources and benefits the unscrupulous at the cost of the law abiding.
Collaborating Caiden (1976) position Amujiri contended that:
On its effect on public accountability, corruption weakens
accountability. It bends the wheel of administrative structure. It
makes policy makers to look timid in taking bold steps to curb
excesses of citizens. In fact, any government official who
receives financial benefit for a contract awarded by his
government would not be bold to question the contract if the
wok was not satisfactory executed.
Corrupt practices have crippled important institution like civil service of all
states in Nigeria, thereby, preventing then from promoting economic development,
and that corruption has promoted inefficiency and ineffectiveness in the civil
service in various ways by sapping legitimacy of the civil service in the eyes of the
people. The above was the observation made by the National Association of
Sociology and Anthropology at a three days conference held in Zaria 1982. In a
similar development the Center for Advanced Social Sciences (CASS) Port-
Harcourt in their seminar in 1993 noted the devastating consequences of
corruption, particularly in government. According to notation, development has
not benefited ordinary Nigerians because of corruption. Most workers are more
interested in the spoils and patronage of office then in serving the messes.
Corruption has quantifiable and unquantifiable cost in public accountability
in particular and our economy in general. For instance, the amount of money lost
to the economy through fraud, bribes and kickbacks, direct stealing, embezzlement
29
of public funds, etc in the both private and public sectors ran into billions of Naira
(Amujiri 2002: 79). In his submission;
It has been incontrovertibly established that corruption has
contributed immeasurably to the stagnant development of the
state. Several years of economic mismanagement misrule,
abuse of office; inefficient and purposeless leadership; socio-
political retrogression and instability, moral decay and betrayal
of social trust; resentment against authority and nonchalant
attitude of Nigeria public and civil servants have affected
public accountability adversely.
Although corruption is considered as the most formidable obstacle to
development there is an emerging school of though that sees corruptions as a
positive development in our body politic. Otite (1983: 11) asserted that, a corrupt
government may not necessarily impede social development. The basic notion
here is that an elaborate and inefficient bureaucracy can reduce or remove red tap
where graft and bribes are introduced to act as incentive. By this assertion,
corruption is used in cutting through red-tapism prevalent in most of our
bureaucracies and by extension bypassing cumbersome, pensively hampering,
governmental economic regulations. Besides this, Otite (1983) presented the
position of those who accept the positive side of corruption. They argue that:
• Widespread corruption could provoke resentment and promote the chances
of a revolution beneficial to society in the long run.
• Corruption and the challenge to excel others in competitive bidding and
payment of high bribes by businessmen and entrepreneurs may produce
efficiency in commodity.
• Where government is inefficient or unwise in its spending and priorities or
where it lacks the capacity to tax excesses, corrupt practices including
avoidance of tax may help accumulate capital which may be better utilized
by entrepreneur for development purposes.
30
• Where aliens are critical factors in socio-economic development, such as
the Asian minority in East African, corruption may help sustain this factor
of development.
• Corruption provides a chance for group other than political parties to
articulate their interest, maintain a channel, and get represented in the
political process.
Corruption has done a lot to sustain Nigerian civil servants. In the midst of
poor or non-payment of salaries, mounting demands from the immediate and
extended families, the only option left for a Nigerian civil servant is to engage in
corruption (Amujiri 2002: 78). To pretend that corruption does not exist only
worsens the problems of resource allocation understanding its character may lead
to better and more realistic planning. And even if corruption is regarded as a vice,
it should be noted for comparison that private vice can cause public benefit
(Aboyada 1971: 5). Corruption has probably been, on balance, a positive factor in
both Russian and American economic development. At least two very important
aspect of British and American political development, the establishment of the
cabinet system in the 18th
century and the national integration of millions of
immigrants in the 19th
century–were based in part on corruption (Nye 1967: 417).
2.1.5 Control Measures
Scholars like Ali (2007: 511-540), and Braibanti (1960: 170) as well as the
ADB (2006) suggested strategies to combating corruption. Ali (2007) suggested
strategies for compulsory public declaration of assets and liability by all class of
public servants, careful amendment of section 308 of the 1999 constitution to
remove the immunity clause, inclusion of anti-corruption clauses in all public
contract agreements, and adoption of the Chines and Saudi Arabian models for
punishment (execution) of official corruption. Braibanti (1966) suggested for the
society value reorientation, creation of alternative means of employment; sincere
political commitment; precision of investigative and sanction device, and strong
judiciary and legislature to restrain bureaucratic excess.
31
The ADB (2006) offers more encompassing strategies to combating
corruption as, sustained political will and leadership committed to fighting
corruption; strengthening of institutions, prudent financial management, such as
the Fiscal Responsibility Act (FRA) in Nigeria, public service reform; public
procurement such as BPP, independent anti-corruption agencies; legal and judicial
reform, strong legislature, vibrant civil society organization; and international
collaboration. Since corrupt money has wings not wheels as in other developing
countries, looted money easily find save heavens abroad (Vital 2000: 3). It is
worthy to note that whatever strategy is adopted as an antidote, it should target the
root causes of corruption in a particular country under study.
Adamolekun (2002: 18) define public service as the totality of the
administrative structures within which the work of government is carried out. It
refers to all organization that exist as part of government’s machinery for
implementing policies and programmes as well as for delivering services to meet
the needs of the citizens (BPS 2007: 1). What constitutes the public service of a
country is largely influenced by domestic laws, practices and convention. Section
318 of the amended 1999 constitution of Federal Republic of Nigeria provides for
the public service of the federation and for the states. The public service means
service of the government of the federation or a state in any capacity. This
encompasses the core civil services as well as elected and political appointees, the
military, police, and other security agencies, staff of the national and state
assemblies and the judiciary, educational institutional, statutory corporation, and
enterprises in which government has controlling share or interest. Combating
corruption in the Nigeria public services therefore implies fighting the vice in the
entire machinery of government of the federation.
2.1.6 Identified gap in Literature Reviewed
From the review of these available documents it becomes clear to note that,
mention was not made on the strategies and ways of strengthening the existing
institutional mechanism put in place by government for combating corruption in
32
the Nigerian public service. These institutions are very weak and they functions
less then adequately and the result is institutionalized corruption, the scenario that
virtually turned Nigeria into a pariah nation. The central thesis here is what will be
the health status of the anti-corruption mechanisms that will enable the effective
reduction of corruption in the country? These shall be the task of this study.
2.2 Hypothesis of the Study
H0: There is no significant relationship between the establishment of
institutional mechanisms for combating corruption and the rate of
corruption in Nigerian Public Service.
H1: There is a significant relationship between the establishment of institutional
mechanisms for combating corruption and the rate of corruption in Nigerian
Public Service.
2.3 Operationalisation of Key Concepts
Institutional Mechanisms: This refers to the laws enacted for the operation of
anti-corruption bodies in Nigeria.
Corruption: An act of commission or omission intended to misappropriate public
assets or office/trust for private gain or circumventing the law, rules and the
process for personal gain.
Public Service: Government (Federal, State and Local) organization with which
work of government is carried out.
Autonomy: This is he ability to act and make decision without being controlled
by any one else.
Crime: This is referring to any conduct, acts or omission prohibited by law and
backed by punishment or punitive sanctions.
Effectiveness: This is the ability to accomplish or fulfill what is intended well
with no waste of time or money.
Self interest: Personal gain to the detriment of the interest of the citizenry.
Public interest: What the majority of the citizens want need or cherish.
33
Public Accountability: This is considered as the responsibility by government
officers to the public in ensuring that not only public funds but also human
resources are used in the service of public interest with the limits of existing rules
and regulation
Punishment: This denotes any aversive stimulus which has the immediate but
temporary effect of reducing in strength (or in probability of occurrence), the
response upon which it was contingent.
Operation: This entails an organized activity that involves several people doing
different things.
2.4 Methodology
2.4.1 Data Gathering Instruments.
Data for this study were generated from primary and secondary sources.
1. Primary Data Collection: This approach of collecting data essentially used
the face-to-face interviewing technique which was conducted using a
structured questionnaire to random selected officers of the anti-corruption
mechanisms.
2. Secondary Data Collection: This approach of collecting data takes into
consideration the fact that, the research is within a time frame of 1999 to
2007 and as such the background information for the evaluation is needed.
These sources include published and unpublished materials such as text
materials in journals, magazines, textbooks and security reports.
2.4.2 Validity and Reliability of the Instrument
According to Asika (2006: 69), validity is the degree to which a measuring
instrument measures what it is designed to measure. This entails that every
measuring instrument is designed for a specific measurement.
The content validity is adopted for the purpose of this study to validate the
instrument by subjecting the questionnaires to intellectual scrutiny by the
supervisor. The supervisor vets the questions in the questionnaire objectively,
34
paying particular attention to their relevance to the subject matter and their
coverage of entire topic of study.
Reliability is defined by Asika (2006: 73) as the consistency between
independent measurements of the same phenomenon. This entails the stability,
dependability and predictability of a measuring instrument. To ensure that the
questionnaire distributed to respondents meet that critical criterion factors which
can affect reliability such as selection of subjects, interference and other
interviewers affect, closeness of subject and difficulties in understanding question
posed are clearly eliminated.
2.4.3 Population of Study
The target populations for the study are the staff of the Benue State Civil
Service totaling about seventeen thousand (17,000). We have been able to obtain
from the payroll system the information recorded in figure two (2) relating to the
distribution of about 17,000 staff (the total in the state civil service and the
parastatals) by grades.
2.4.4 Sample of Study
Five percent (5%) of the total population of seventeen thousand (17,000)
were drawn, taking eight hundred and fitly (850) as the representative sample size.
2.4.5 Sampling Procedure.
The simple random technique, were used for the selection of respondents to
be interviewed and the face to face interviewing technique was conducted using a
structured questionnaire.
2.4.6 Method of Data Analysis
Qualitative and quantitative methods of data analysis were employed.
However emphasis was placed more on the quantitative method using tables and
simple percentages as well as chi-square (x2) used to test the hypothesis of the
study.
35
2.5 Theoretical Framework
It is necessary to produce a theoretical understanding of corruption to place
the various assumptions and related causal concepts in improper perspective. It is
therefore expedient to review public choice theory.
2.5.1 Public Choice Theory
The public choice theory directed toward the study of politics based on
economic principles. The most important contribution of public choice theory is
that, it recognized that politicians and public officers are motivated by self interest.
Public choice theory variously referred to Social Choice Theory, Rational
Choice Theory and Economics of Politics has had tremendous impact on public
policy and public administration during the past three decades. Ducan Black
(1958) is often referred to as “the father of public choice theory”. Others are
Tullock Gordon (1987, 1989 and 1962) and Buchanan James (1996). However, it
was George Stigler (1971) and Sam Peltzman (1996) that developed the
application of public choice theory to government regulation while William
Niskan (1987) is generally considered as the founder of public choice literature on
Bureaucracy (Wikipedia Encyclopedia, 2008).
The central tenet of public choice is that individuals are indeed utility
maximizes, such that they will support policies that convey the greatest individual
benefit. The basic unit of discussion is the individual and that; purposive action by
an individual is the essence of social behaviour. As utility maximizes, bureaucrats
will use their power to enlarge agency budgets, giving them larger perquisites as a
complement to the static civil servant income (Hackler 2003; 1019). These
bureaucratic actions lead to resource wast and rent seeking. Johnson (1991) stated
that “the source of bureaucratic problems lies not in the bureaucrat but in the
nature of public goods and the incentives, controls and institution existing in the
bureaucracy. And while some public servants may selflessly pursue the public
good, others do so while simultaneously pursuing their careers and economic gain
(Krueger, 1974, 1993) as reiterated by Olaopa (2008: 46). This boils down to the
36
fact that, contrary to the views of Webber and Beethan (1987) that, bureaucrats are
benevolent and social guardians maximizing general welfare which is sometimes
equated with the objective of the state, the bureaucrats as utility maximize pursue
self interest in the form of over-extended government spending, rampant
clientilism and rent seeking (Tullock, 1965; Niskanem, 1971; and Krueger, 1993).
One way to organize the subject matter studies by public choice theorists
are to begin with the foundation of state itself to which the origin of
Government is fundamental. The bulk of the study has been concerned with the
fundamental problem of collectively choosing constitutional rules. The work
assumes that a group of individuals who aim to form government focuses on the
problem of hiring the agents required to carry out government function as agreed
upon by members. The questions that need to be addressed here are: how to hire
competent and trustworthy individual to carry out the business of the government
and how to set up an effective oversight and sanctions for individuals that violate
the rules.
In answering the question above, it is necessary to assess the effects of
creating different loci of power and decision making in public service,
examination of election and appointment that might be established to influence the
bahaviour of elected and appointed public servants such as the code of conduct for
public Servants; the Civil Service Rules, Financial
Regulation/instruction/Memoranda, the Independent Corrupt Practices and other
Related Offences Commission (ICPC), Economic and financial Crimes
Commission (EFCC) and Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB), Acts inter-alia in
Nigeria and to evaluate alternative constitutional and legal rights that could be
reserved for the citizens (Wikipedia Encyclopedia, 2008).
The public choice theory has been criticized on many grounds. This
includes the language of analytic tool in economic which are inadequate in a
bureaucratic situation in which complex disposition come into play. Public choice
theory also loses sight of the existence of public services ethos which embodies
37
the beliefs and norm of conduct that define the role of public servants. However,
the effectiveness of this public service ethos is another question.
2.5.2 Relevance of the Theory
Public choice from a constitutional political economy perspective questions
the out comes of the political market by examining the origins of government. The
argument is that the choice within a constitution-operational decisions such as the
size of the education or defense budget (Jackson 1988; 13). Thus, constitutional
rules are the institutions that shape a government response to society and the
efficiency of that response.
A constitution’s framework also affects the composition of government and
determines how politicians can represent and address their constituent’s concerns.
Politicians use political party platforms to appeal to voters, and individual desires
from a aggregate impact on pressure groups. Finally, within government,
politicians work for legislation that is beneficial to them. This could account be
way Nigeria politician spend so much time and money making lows that will be in
their faviour. In the eyes of public choice theory, these events do not proceed
without private interests out weighing public interests.
Closely related to the above view is that each event entails decision making
in the political market. In Nigeria, the voting rules, enforced to permit the mixture
of majority and minority preferences, create further problems and biases. For
example, government may gain greater discretionary power because of the
incentives for rational ignorance-that it is in an individuals best interest to remain
ignorant of particular issues because the cost of gaining information that exist are
unable to allow citizens to express the intensity of their preferences for public
goods.
With government as the producer of public goods and citizens as the
consumers, rational actors represent both sides of the political market. Just as for
bureaucrats, public choice holds that citizens have preferences for the provision of
public goods, demanding a specific quantity, quality, desired mix of these public
38
goods. The central problem in the political market is how citizen preferences are
realized and expressed. Public choice holds that only efficient government
institutions will enable the conveyance of this information such that government
will produce the appropriate amount and mix of public services.
The concern for efficient mechanisms leads to another prominent issue
within public choice theory-rent seeking. Within economics, a rent is the amount
paid for a resource that is fixed in supply in both the short and long term (Vanden
2000:604). Wealth is accumulated from these resources because its supply is
restricted particularly of market conditions are not competitive. Rent seeker desire
government regulation that promotes barriers to entry, and they will engage in
activities that use numerous resources inefficiently Rent seeker employ the time
and other resources of law, marketing, and financial-experts to lobby for favorable
government legislation. Public choice desires better constitutional rules and
institutions to minimize rent-seeking activity.
The large part of public choice theory examines the bureaucratic
implementation of policy within government and its agencies although public
administration and political science prescribes that bureaucrats seek the common
good or public interest as civil servants, public choice holds that bureaucrats are
rational individuals that will pursue policies that are personally and professionally
beneficial.
Public choice theory seeks to improve government decision making
through the minimization of public servants tendencies and rent seeking. Public
choice recognizes that every action has multiple costs associated with it (this
account for the high cost of running government in Nigeria as a result of
corruption), and understanding the political market consequences of the selected
instrument associated with such government action is central to making decision
about whether particular goods should be publicly provided; and if public, which
instruments best minimize the costs and externalities in the political market.
39
Although public choice is contentious to those in political science and
public administration, many recognize the importance of questioning bureaucratic
activity. Jackson (1988:20) stressed the importance of questioning “”Whose
interest are served by the policy, which interests dominate the process and why
inefficient government institutions lead to bureaucratic failures, and public choice
theory addresses these failures by proposing changes to the rules and incentive
structures in public services.
40
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF BEUNE STATE
3.1 History of Benue State
It is convenient to trace the history of Benue State from the political
engineering of the British colonial administration in Nigeria, especially with the
creation of the Benue province in 1926 following earlier administrative re-
organizations and restructuring in the Northern Region (Adejo, 2005:71). By 1946
Benue province consisted of the Idoma Division, Tiv Division, Wukari Division
(which has three independent areas-Kentu, Tigon and Ndora-in the mandated
territory), Nassarawa Division and Lafia Division. Makerdi town had a Native
Authority capacity. A very interesting remark was made, as indicated in the 1946.
Annual Report to the province, that the province economically had remained
prosperous and money appear to be plentiful as evidenced by the rapid tax
collection which was virtually completed by the end of the year (Mac Donald,
1946:4).
By 1959, Benue province, with an area of 19,318sq miles, had a total
population of 1,468,229 people within the Northern region (Counsel 1959:25).
The structure of the province remained the same until the military incursion into
politics in 1966. The military administration of Yakubu Gowon abolished the
regions and created twelve states on May 27, 1967. Benue province was merged
with Plateau province to become Benue-Plateau State. The aim was to correct the
structural imbalance between the sub-national groups of the country and also to
allay the minority group fear of being dominated by the major ethnic group within
the regions. But, as remarked by an analyst,
The jubilation that accompanied Benue peoples’ temporary relief
from the oppressive northern oligarchy was substituted for an
equally coordinated suppression campaign ….. Ordinarily, when
states are created it is expected that political tension will be eased
and the pace of socio-economic and political development
41
quickened. But in Benue-Plateau State the reverse was the ease,
as polecat tension and hostility not only escalated, but also led to
a deliberate policy of under developing the Benue section of the
state, openly manifested in Gonwalk’s policies (Okpaga, 2005:
149).
Further administrative and political restructuring of the Nigeria Federation
on February 3, 1976 witnessed the creation of seven more additional states with
Benue State coming into existence. The new Benue state was a fusion of the Tiv,
Idoma, Igala as well as other sub-cultural groups like Igede, Etulo, Akweya, Ufia
and Bassa. At inception, the state comprised Seven Local Government Areas of
Ankpa, Dekina, Gboko, Idah, Katsina-Ala, Makurdi and Otukpo. The creation of
Benue State was of momentous significance for the people but principally it
marked the realization of the wishes of those prominent Benue indigenes who led
the struggle for emancipation.
However, as Okpage observed, “the composition of the new state did not
augur well for cordial relationships among the people. Inter-tribal suspicions
manifested themselves in the so-called Benue Triangle; the tripartite divide of Tiv,
Idoma and Igala. This Struggle for positions and allocation in the state resulted in
frivolous and sectional pursuits” (Okpage 2005: 150). It was big relief as a new
federal structure emerged on August 27, 1991 when the Igala and Bassa areas
were excised to form part of the new Kogi State. Benue State was then left with
the two major ethnic groups of Tiv and Idoma, along with their sub-group.
Benue State today has twenty three local government areas of Agatu, Ado,
Apa, Otukpo, Ohimini Okpokwu, Ogbadibo, Oju, Obi, Gwer, Gwer West,
Konshisha, Kwande, Katsina-Ala, Logo, Gboko, Buruku, Tarka, Makurdi, Guman,
Ukum, Ushorgo and Vandeikya. The state is surrounded by seven other states of
the federation viz: Ebonyi, Enugu, Kogi, Cross River, Taraba and Nasarawa
States. Benue also has an international boundary on the eastern stretch of the state
42
along the Kwande Local Government axis with the Republic of Cameroon (Adejo
2010: 57).
3.2 The Development Potentials of Benue State
The creation of Benue State in February 1976 marked the climax of a long
struggle. By the 1991 population census, it has 498,554 households spread over a
reasonable land area and the 2006 census was 4.253,64 (2,144,043 males and
109,598 females). Average population density over sq-km is high but nearly 80%
of the people are rural-based dwellers. Majority of the population are farmers who
plant a variety of crops. Major crops include yam, cassava, corn and cereals of all
kinds, benniseed, soya-bean. Abundant plantation/orchard crops like orange,
mango, cashew, palm tree etc. Reasonable livestock population like goats, pigs,
native cow, sheep, chicken etc, dry season farming along the banks of River Benue
and its numerous tributaries and distributions (Okpaga 2005).
It is important to stress that the Benue physical environment is conducive
for all shades of agricultural activities. The soil is of over seven different types and
climate permits very luxuriant woodland vegetation. Its wet and dry climatic type
permit seasons of intense profitable agriculture and period of rest within harvest
and storage. All these have earned the state the names of Food Basket, Bread
Basket and Fertile Midland etc (Adejo 2010: 58).
However, although agriculture is the largest employer of the workforce,
less than half of the large tracts of cultivable land are actively utilized. Farmer’s
stills rely on traditional practice of cultivation (Adejo, 2010). The processing and
storage is poor as well, the low level of mechanization is prevalent.
Benue State is no less endowed with solid mineral resources. Some have
been determined to be of reasonable quantity in reservation while other requires
bold investigation. According to Adejo, these include Coal, Barite, Limestone,
Petroleum Clay etc. The resources available to the state have led to the
establishment of some factories and companies (although most are moribund or at
the level of un-completion) but quite strategic. They include Taraku Oil Mills,
43
Taraku; Agro-Millers Ltd, Makurdi; Benue Breweries Ltd, Makurdi; Benue Cattle
Ranch, Ikyogen; Agricultural Development Ltd, Makurdi; Benue Burnt Bricks
Ltd, Otukpo; Benue Rooftiles Ltd, Abinsi; Benue Cement, Gboko; Bentha
Makurdi Fruitcon Ltd, K/Aia; Fertilizer Blending Plant, Makurdi; Makurdi
International Hotel Ltd; Tomato/Mango Juice Factory, Wannune, Cassava
Processing factory, Makurdi; Benue Fruit juice company, Makurdi; Benue
Cement, Igumale etc. However, infrastructural development (water electricity,
road, housing etc) is irritatingly very low and has affected all the vital sectors of
the economy like Agriculture, Transport, Health, Commerce, Industries, Tourism
and Tele Communications.
Since the inception in 1976, Benue State has recorded tremendous growth
in the area of education Gyosugh and Amenger (2010:4) submitted that, from the
background of a few secondary schools and a tertiary institution, the state now has
over 500 secondary schools and six tertiary institutions. The tertiary institutions
include the college of Education at Katsina-Ala and Oju, the Benue State
polytechnic at Ugbokolo, College of Advanced and Professional Studies in
Makeudi, Akperan Orshi College of Agriculture in Yandave, the School of Health
Technology at Agasha and the schools of Nursing and Midwifery in Markudi, the
Benue State University. The Federal Government also established one University
and three Secondary institutions in the state namely: Federal Government Girls
College Gboko, Federal Government College Vandeikya, Otobi and the University
of Agriculture Makurdi, the immense contribution made in the state by Christian
Missions (University of Mkar), Development Association and Individuals are
widely acknowledged.
3.3 Administrative Structure of Benue State
The State administration is made up of the Executive, Legislative and
Judiciary. The executive arm of government comprises the Governor, Deputy
Governor, the Secretary to the Government, the Head of service and
Commissioners. The legislature, in its composition has the Speaker of the House,
44
Deputy Speaker, Majority Leader, Minority Leader, Majority Whip, Minority
Whip, the Clerk of the House and Clerk of the arms.
The clerks of the arms are responsible for taking minutes of the standing
committees of the House. Lastly, are the rest of the members of the State
Assembly, Benue state has twenty nine members in the House of Assembly. The
Judiciary is the system of courts of the judges collectively; the State judiciary is
made up of the Chief Judge, High Court Judges, the Registrar of the High Court
and Deputy Registrar, the Directors, the Judges of the customary Courts and their
Registrars.
The indigenous administrative structures and institutions include the Tiv
Traditional Council, Idoman Traditional Council and religious organization. The
Tiv Traditional Council is headed by a first class chief, the Tor Tiv, who is
advised by a council of elders known as Jirtamen. Under the Tor Tiv are the
second class chiefs called “Ter” whose domain is Local Government Area. The
third class chiefs, called Tyoor, take charge of the districts. Below these are the
kindred heads called ortaregh who are in charge of kindred’s. Last along the line
are the Tax collectors known as Torkpande. http.//www.onlinenigeria.com/links/
benweadv.asp?blurb2011.
3.4 Socio-Economic and Political Organization
If we take as characteristic of a state such features as territorial sovereignty
and a central government enjoying the monopoly of the use of legitimate force, the
people of what to day constituted Benue state which dominated by two tribes (Tiv
and Idoma) is an example of a stateless society, to use of term of (Fortes and
Pritchard quoted in Anifowose 1982: 75). In Benue, there was no central authority
or a common chief (The Post of Tor Tiv and Och’ Idoma, king or chief of the Tiv
and Idoma, is an artificial creation which came into existence in 1946). There was
no person traditionally comparable to the hamlet head (Dagech) in the House-
Fulan, emirates. The basic organization was in terms of a lineage traced
patrilineally from any one individual to the original Tiv or Idoma. The authority of
45
a patrilineal individual was limited to his lineage segment, the elder of the segment
having authority within, but not beyond it.
Urbanization was an alien feature of the Benue people pattern of social
organization, they are essentially a rural people who do not normally live in towns
but in tiny compounds varying from ten to thirty persons in size and scattered
throughout the farmland. To day, there are only five towns; these include Gboko,
Makurdi, Katsina-ala, Otukpo, Oju and Vandeikya. The people’s great respect to
age and the authority of elders is therefore maintained. The compound head is
usually the oldest person in the compound. His authority rested on his personality,
ability and powers of persuasion. The autocratic exercise of authority runs counter
to the people egalitarianism and to their republican frame of mind. In an extreme
situation, autocratic action by an elder might lead to the beak-up of the compound
especially among the Tiv people, with the offending elder being left to sit alone.
All the agnatic descendants of a single ancestor with their compounds (of
varying size) and farms form a territorial bloc. Authority within such a block rests
with the council at elders of the compounds. Meetings of the elders were
summoned to discuss matters affecting the kindred’s as a whole-war, territorial
disputes and exchange marriages. In these meeting, agreements were often reached
by consensus and the council was powerless to impose its will upon individual
compounds (Laura and Bohanna in Anifowose 1982). The heads of the
compounds did not sit in the council of elders as executive officials, but simply as
spokesmen. As Bohanna notes, “whatever their prestige, they are granted only
influences and not, authority”. Thus, traditionally among the Tiv and Idoma form
the two blocs in Benue, chieftaincy as we know it in Yoruba and Hausa lands did
not develop. In Akiga’s words in Abraham (1940:13) “the conception of executive
chieftainship is foreign to the Tiv. One can refer legitimately to a leader but hardly
ever to a chief”.
Leadership is not inherited, offering a sharp contrast to Yoruba and House-
Fulani, where authority passes from father to son. Any form of social and political
46
stratification in terms of birth, status, occupational differentiation and ethnic
identity is therefore foreign to the people. Leadership is not a function of certain
socially recognized, predetermined variables, but of individual merit and ability
plus knowledge of ritual processes. In short as Anifowose (I982: 76) rightly noted
“the conception of office, in Max Weber’s usage of the term and as known in the
centralized Hausa-Fulani, emirates, is unknown in Benue Society. However,
individual authority among the people is in most cases confined to specific
spheres. For example, in moments of crisis, a skillful and brave fighter becomes
the leader of his people on the battlefield. In this capacity, such men are called
“leader in war”. The head of the family was its magico-religious head and his
activities were not political. The elders as well as all other types of leaders, held
office by the grace of the people and hence their behavior was strictly subject to
the control of the people.
However, while British administration noted the decentralized nature of the
people of Benue political structure, they did not for a long time understand the
Benue social structure. They failed to appreciate that the Tiv and Idoma had no
chieftaincy system whereby an individual was recognized as chief and exercised
power legitimated by his office. Colonial Government which was undemocratic in
its essential aspects was imposed on the people. But to attempt to impose the
norms and rules of an alien institution on a society with a different social structure
and culture was to create the conditions for stress, violence and corruption
(Anifowose 1970:4). This attempt added enormously to the problem of occupation
and administering the people.
The economic development of the Benue people cannot be overstressed.
More than eighty percent of the people are farmers. They cultivate mainly
subsistence crops and some cash crops-Benniseed and Soybeans. In the old
Northern Nigeria, Benue province was the largest producer of those crops and the
Tiv in particular formed the largest single producers in the province (Paul and
Bohanna 1968). The contribution of the Benue people to the revenue of the
47
Northern Region through the sales from Soybeans and Benniseed was therefore
substantial. Benue state contribution to the food needs of Nigeria bestows on it the
status of the Food Basket of Nigeria However, industrially, the province remains
undeveloped. There was only one industry-the Boat Building Yard at Makurdi
which could provide jobs to only sixty people (Anifowose 1982).
In realization of the need to boost agricultural productivity and add value to
farmers produce as well as the economy in Benue State, the Government
established several agro-industries between 1976 and 1990. The companies are:
The Agricultural Development Company (ADC), Benue Breweries Limited
(BBL), Benue Cattle Ranch, Ikyogen, Taraku Mills Limited, Agro Millers
Limited, The Agro Service Centres, Benue Agricultural Ruler Development
Authority (BNARDA) (Uza 2010).All these are channel towards economic
enhancement.
3.5 Culture and Religious Life of People of Benue state
Benue state possesses a rich and diverse cultural heritage which finds
expression in colorful cloths, exotic masquerades, supplicated music and dances.
Traditional dances from Benue State have won acclaim at national and
international cultural festivals. According to Okpaga (2005), these dances include
Ingyough, Ange, Anchanakupa and Swange among the Tiv, and Anuwowowo and
Odabaru among the Idoma. He posits that the Tiv kwagh-hir theatre provides
memorable entertainment in its dramatization of Tiv folklore and social
commentary.
Marriage, funerals and other rites of passage provide occasion for rich
displays of the people’s cultural heritage.
Fishing festivals and communal hunting expeditions are colourful and
memorable social events among various communities. The Igede Agba (a new
yam festival) and the Ujo festival are the most important social occasions among
the Igede and Igumale/Agia people respectively.
48
The first organized state-wide kwagh-hir competition festival dates back as
far as December 1981 and was initiated by the then chairman of the Benue State
Council for Arts and culture, Dr. Iyoruese Hagher, a university professor
(www.benuestate.gov.ng 2011)
Among the Tiv speaking people of Benue state of Nigeria the Word
“kwagh-hir” literally means the folktale or simply something magical
(www.benuestate.gov.ng 2011). It is a unique form of theatre in the generic
concept of folktales told in traditional societies all over the world. Folktales are
told in virtually all societies all over the world with trickster characters like the
rabbit, or the tortoise or the cat dominating their plots and playing unassailable
roles. The objectives of these folktales and stories are not only to entertain young
children at bedtime but to also teach some morals on contemporary issues. The
kwagh-hir theatre is therefore an enactment of the Tiv folktales. Since the Tiv
people are good hunters, their stories and imaginations are full of bush animals
(Nyam). Some of the episodes of the kwagh-hir feature highly imaginative forms
of wild beasts that dance to the melodious tunes of the humans. Tiv folktales are
not only told about animals, but spirits (Azov) and puppets (Even) as well.
Spirits in the world-view of African societies are a reality. Benue people
like other Africans believed in the existence of the spiritual world of various
people made by the Almighty God, lesser gods, good spirits, evil spirits and
ancestors. In fact, human beings who live virtuous lives and die at a ripe old age
transform into the state of ancestors who must be appeased anytime a social
occasion is to start. In the imagination of the Tiv kwagh-hir theatre, spirits
manifest in many fantastic forms performing various activities as are carried
among human beings.
What perhaps distinguishes the kwagh- hir theatre from any other theatre in
the world is its composite nature bringing together the role of carvers, drummers,
singers, masquerades dancers, manipulators and actors. It features a rich repertoire
49
of marionettes performing various human activities with a view to making
comment or teaching morals in the Tiv society.
In essence, the kwagh-hir theatre is a unique fusion of the human world, the
spiritual world, the animal world and the world of fantasy. All these characters
share common music and instrumentation, common beliefs, common world view
and common virtues. Although the kwagh-hir performance may not have a single
plot as in formal drama, each enactment has its own characters, action and
message existing independently.
The socio-religious festivals of the state are equally famous. The Alekwu
ancestral festival of the Idoma for instance, is an occasion when, it is popularly
believed the ancestors emerge from the spirit world to reestablish contact with the
living in forms of masquerades. Although, the Benue population is largely made
up of christians and traditional religious worshippers. Muslims constitute an
insignificant number, scattered only in a few ‘colonies’ in the big towns of
Makurdi, Otukpo, Gboko and Katshina-Ala.
51
3.6 Background Information on the Benue State Civil Services
Commentaries on the performances of the civil services, by both its
apologists and critics alike, rarely make reference to the historical background of
the administrative machinery, as it sheds some light on the various aspects of it
present state of being. Yet, on examination, it becomes clear that the civil service
as it is today. In spite of the various reforms during the last four and a half
decades, still retains many of the structural and operational patterns inherited from
the colonial administration.
Although the scope of responsibilities of the colonial civil service and
consequently its size were much more limited than what we have today in Benue
State today, the civil service was and still is the principle employer of labour in the
state. The structure was patterned after the British model characterized as a
basically class and closed career services; and its functions, limited to “public
management” i.e maintaining law and order and collecting revenue for
Government. Thus, in terms of scale or size, internal structure as well as the
burden of economic and social services it is expected to carry, the civil service in
the immediate post-independence era, was a much simpler system of organization
than it is at present. In line with Armstrong’s (1970.1) observation, the civil
services, like any social institution responds to changing times and changing
needs, “not only the manifest changes following from a change of government but
also the longer-terms, less immediately obvious, changes arising from
developments in society as a whole and its institution both public and privet”.
A number of factors must have brought about the relatively new forms of
responsibility, which in turn must have necessitated new or expanded structures
and new or modified approaches or processes in the administration of government
policies and programmes in Benue state.
Perhaps, the most obvious factors was the attainment of single state in
1976, accompanied inexorably by rising expectations for Government to embark
on state policies on education, health, housing, infrastructural development,
52
employment and a lot of other problem areas. Government ability to respond to
these new demands were made possible by the creation of new ministries and
extra-ministerial agencies old ones were expanded and new civil service systems
were established for newly created local government areas in the state.
The Benue State Civil Service is made up of thirteen (13) ministries and
prostatals established in the following regulatory services and development areas;
regulatory service, personnel administration, administration of justice, policy staff
services, research and development, administration of social services,
development agencies and administration of economic services (Pine 2008). The
modern civil service in a developing society has accepted responsibility, as the
custodian of deferent kind of knowledge, expertise. Skills and technologies needed
in policy counseling and in executing policies and programmes of government.
The growth of government and the public sector in Benue State during the
last decades or so according to Abdulsalami (1991:4), has been accompanied by
corresponding changes in the perception of the civil service and a demand for
change in the structure, method of operation as well as the attitude of the state civil
service.
3.7 Function and Structure of Benue State Civil Service
The civil service has become part and parcel of modern government. Its
function are numerous and varied. The Benue State civil servant collect facts and
figures, undertake research, advise the commissioner who is a novice to his new
appointment, and make plans to satisfy the needs and requirements of the people
.what the civil service really does according to Anyebe (2007) is to maintain the
government as a going concern it oils the machinery of politics by relating it to
detached, disinterested and practicable experience. With the increasing activities
of the state the elected executives are no more in a position to handle effectively
the various aspects of public affairs (Eghe 2002) .They depend greatly upon the
information analysis and judgment of the civil servants. The civil service
53
constitutes the machinery through which the Benue State government realizes its
objectives or fulfils its obligations towards its citizens.
The function of the Benue civil servants especially the higher ones is no
longer restricted to the giving of policy advice to the people above them, more and
more, they are assuming the managerial role of running effectively the
administrative machinery under them (Ato, 2008). Benue administrator like their
counterpart in other state are no longer anonymous this is because they also
participates in the policy making process. In agreement with this view Eghe (2002:
259) postulate that, today, the civil servant plays a crucial role of canvassing
support for a government policies and programmes. He further stated that, the civil
servant has to seek public participation in the implementation of such policies and
progremmes.
The structure of Benue State civil service is organized in line with the 1974
recommendations of the Udoji Commission the unified grading system in which
all the jobs or position in the service were graded from levels 01-17, grade level 01
being the lowest while grade level 17 represents the highest position in the Civil
service (Civil Service Report 2008). With the development, an employee can join
the service at level 01 and climbs upwards to his ability before retirement. In spite
of this, five main classes of civil servants which existed prior to the Udoji
commission still exist today in Benue State, though not officially. These include
the administration class, the professional class, the executive class, the clerical
class, and the manipulative class.
As a matter of fact, the organizational structure of the Benue state Civil
Service reflects its bureaucratic nature. It is highly hierarchical, having no fewer
than sixteen (16) level or grades. It formally organized around thirteen (13) line
ministries which are subdivided into departments, paratatals boards and agencies.
No organizational chart of the service is currently available, but the structure is
illustrated graphically in the State Reform Team (SRT) document (Benue Profile
and Institutional Assessment 2002). As is customary in this type of rather rigid
54
structure, there are few mechanisms for coordination across the hierarchy (merrick
and Kembe 2002)
The Civil Service Commission (CSC) is responsible for recruitment and
posting of staff in the grade level seven (7) and above, with the exception of the
appointment of permanent secretaries which is done by the state Governor.
Authority to appoint staff up to grade level six (6) is delegated to ministries (Bual
1999).
Figure 2: Distribution of Staff by Grade Level
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Grade Level
Nu
mb
er o
f S
taff
Source: SRT: Benue Profile and Institutional Assessment (2002)
The establishment of Ministries, parastatals and agencies by government is
broadly in line with the classical organization theory which explains that
administrative organization are set up according to purposes, according to
“function”, or according to “process”. Accordingly the scope of activities and the
number of different agencies established at any time depends on the powers and
responsibilities of Government as defined by the constitution and on the size, of
resources available to government at each level (Abdulsalmi 1991). The Benue
55
State civil service is structured in to thirteen (13) ministries and office of head of
service under the following names;
Ministry of commerce industry and Tourism:- The ministry is responsible
for formulation and implementation of policies on commercial industrial and
tourism developments; Advancing Government on commercial, industrial, and
Tourism ventures. It is the cabinet responsibilities of over 14 Government owned
companies and prostratels. The ministry is currently structured into four major
departments namely: administration and finance, commerce, industries and
tourism.
Ministry of Agriculture and National Resources:- This ministry is saddled
with the responsibility of formulating virile policies/programmes and to monitor
the implementation of the following policy objective, Attainment of Self-
sufficiency in the basic food products for enhanced food security. Increase
production of agricultural raw materials to meet the growing demand in the agro-
allied industries. Modernization of agricultural productions processing, storage
and distribution through the infusion of improved technological packages and
management so that agriculture can be more responsive to the demands of other
sectors of the economy among others. The ministry is made up of six directorates,
two parastatals, one tertiary institution and an outfit for accelerated food
production.
Ministry of Education:- The ministry aims at providing adequate qualitative
education on cooperative basis between teachers, parents, communities, voluntary
agencies and corporate bodies. The ministry has six functional department’s one
state university and four tertiary institutions.
Ministry of Finance:- The functions of the ministry touch on the activities
of all other government establishments and some other non-governmental
institutions within and outside the state. Such statutory functions and
responsibilities include the formulation of major financial policies for the state
Government; Advising Government on Financial matters including investment,
56
Reports Grants, Loans and the disposing of government stores and unserviceable
vehicles; Entering into financial relationship with other government among others.
The ministry of finance comprises of three main departments and has cabinet
responsibilities over the office of the Accountant General and Board of Internal
Revenue.
Ministry of Health:- The ministry saddle with responsibilities of over seem
health affairs of the state. The ministry is structured into seven departments.
Administration and Supply, Finance and Accounts, Health Planning and Research,
Pharmaceutical Services, Nursing Services, Clinical Services and Public Health.
The ministry also has Hospital Management Board as its parastatal responsible for
the day to day running of government hospitals.
Ministry of Information and Culture:- The ministry is organized in four
main departments and deals essentially with policy matters of its mandate. The
ministry has six parestatals and a statutory Government department. The six
parastatals under the ministry and superintended by it are: Radio Benue; Benue
Printing and Publishing Corporations; Benue State council for Arts and culture;
Benue State library Board; Government Printing Department and Benue State
Television Corporation.
Ministry of Justice:- The ministry is essentially a professional and service-
oriented ministry established to render legal service to the government of Benue
state and all its agencies. The ministry of justices is structured into the following
department directorates, of public prosecution, civil litigation, legal drafting and
advisory services, citizen rights protection and administration as well as finance.
The ministry has area chambers in some local government area of the state. It also
runs a marriage Registry.
Ministry of Lands and Surveys:- The ministry is comprised of three
technical departments; Town planning, lands and land surveys, with a support
department of administration and finance.
57
Ministry of Rural Development and Cooperatives:- The ministry for Rural
development and cooperatives was created with the primary mandate to initiate,
implement, manage and sustain development programmes amongst rural
communities especially in the key areas of infrastructure, economic empowerment
and human capacity building. The ministry has the responsibility of coordinating
and monitoring the activities of other organizations and agencies involved in the
implementation of rural development activities, as well as mobilizing additional
resources for rural development in the state. It have established a ministerial
structure with four Department and two programme support units.
Ministry of Water Resources and Environment: The ministry has as its
primary objective, the provision of potable water to the growing population of
Benue State. The ministry also has the mandate to address more adequately, the
ecological and environmental challenges of the states. The ministry has five
department as well as five parestatals. The parastatals are Benue State Water
Board (BSWB), Benue State Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Agency
(BERWASSAL, Benue State Urban Development Board (BSUDB), Benue State
Environmental Sanitation Authority (BENSESA) and Local Empowerment and
Environmental Management Programme (LEEMP).
Ministry of Women Affairs and Social Development:- The ministry is an
offshoot of the defunct Benue State Commission for Women became a ministry in
1997 following Federal Government directives that all commission for women
Affairs be up-graded to the status of a ministry. The ministry has four departments
made up of one general service department and three operational professional
departments.
Ministry of Works, Housing and Transport:- The Benue State ministry of
Works, Housing and Transport has six (6) Directorates each headed by a Director.
The Directorates are civil engineering directorate, public building and housing
directorate, mechanical engineering directorate, Administration and supplies
directorate and finance and accounts directorate. The ministry also oversees the
58
activities of two parastatals each headed by a General Manager. These parastatals
are: Ben house Building society and Benue Links Company.
Ministry of Youth and Sports: The ministry of youth and sports which is a
vehicle for physical enhancement, promotion of National unity and cohesion as
well as an instrument for international diplomacy and youth development is
structured into three main departments which include administration and finance,
youth development and sports development department respectively.
The office of Head of Service is made up of five Bureau, each is headed by
a permanent secretary .these bureau include Administration, service welfare,
Establishment and management services, manpower Development and Training as
well as pensions.
All the ministries are headed by commissioners who are the Chief
Executive Officers are overseeing the affairs of the ministries while the permanent
secretary is the chief administrative officer of the ministry and the accounting
officer and the departments are overseeing by directors.
3.8 Environment Effects on the Benue State Civil Service
The historical, geographical, political and socio-economic factors, usually
referred to by social scientists as ecology, have such inference on the structure and
functions of the Benue Civil service. Although Udoji has identified the
universality of the problem, there is no doubt that it differs from one society to
another in content and magnitude (Udoji 1974). The sociological factors, for
example, would be less severe in homogenous than in plural societies, among
which Benue is one. The Benue Public Service still being characterized by family,
local, and ethnic loyalties which compete with and often take precedence over
loyalties to state, coupled with the problem of widespread corruption.
To curb these problems, there is need to have a public service code of
Ethics and a new style of public service. The code of Ethics should be geared
towards eliminating, or at least, combing the problems of corruption and
instituting a sense of state consciousness while the new style public service will be
59
geared towards results oriented management to generate and maintain efficiency in
the public service. Toward this end while the institution of ombudsman caters for
the issue of maladministration, other institutional machineries need to be establish
or strengthened to cover the issue of corruption in the Nigerian society in general
and Benue Public Service in particular. Such machineries include Economic and
Financial Crime Commission (EFCC), the Independent Corrupt Practices and
other Related Offences Commission (ICPC); the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB)
and its Tribunal and Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP).
60
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
4.1 Introduction
This chapter deals with the presentation, interpretation and analysis of
respondents of the respondent studied. This provides the analysis of the data
collected.
Eight hundred and fifty (850) questionnaires which are five percent (5%) of
the total population of seventeen thousand (17,000) are administered. In all, eight
hundred and ten (810) questionnaires were returned, giving ninety five percent
(95%) returns. It is on these returns that the analysis of the data is based.
4.2 Presentation of Bio Data of the Respondents
Table 4.2.1: Classification of Respondents According to sex
Sex Frequency Percentage
Male 520 64%
Female 290 36%
Total 810 100%
Source: Field Survey 2010
As contained in Table one above, five hundred and twenty (520)
respondents, representing sixty four percent (64%) were male while two hundred
and ninety (290) respondents, representing sixty four percent (34%) were females.
Table 4.2.2: Age Distribution of the Respondents
Age Frequency Percentage
20 – 35 185 23%
36 – 45 343 42%
46 and Above 282 35%
Total 810 100%
Source: Field survey
61
Table two above gives us the classification of respondents according to age.
From the table respondents under 20 – 35 years constituted one hundred and
eighty five (185) representing twenty three percent (23%), while those whose ages
falls between 36 – 45 were three hundred and forty three (343) representing forty
two percent (42%). Those aged 46 and above were two hundred and eight two
(282) respondents, representing thirty five percent (35%).
Table 4.2.3: Educational Status of the Respondents
Level of Education Frequency Percentage
WAEC/NECO (SSCE) 109 13%
OND/NCE 150 19%
HND/B.Sc 456 56%
M.Sc/Ph.D 95 12%
Total 810 100%
Source: Field Survey
Table three shows the level of education acquired by the respondents. It
revealed that one hundred and nine (109) respondents, representing thirteen
percent (13%) acquired WAEC/NECO (SSCE) while one hundred and fifty (150),
and four hundred and fifty six (456) respondents which constituted nineteen (19)
and fifty six (56%) acquired OND/NCE and HND/B.Sc respectively. The
remaining ninety five (95) respondents that constituted twelve percent (12%)
obtained M.Sc/Ph.D.
62
Table 4.2.4: Respondents Categories According to Periods of Service
Period Frequency Percentage
25 years and above 81 10%
20-below 25 years 121 15%
15-below 20 years 89 11%
10-below 15 years 81 10%
5 – below 10 years 193 24%
Below 5 years 245 30%
Total 810 100%
Source: Field survey 2011
From table four above, it can be deduced that, one hundred and eight (108)
respondents, representing fifty four percent (54%) are civil servants whose periods
of experience in the public service range from below-5 years. The rest respondents
totaling ninety two (92) representing forty six percent (46%) are civil servants
whose experience is above 10 years.
Table 4.2.5: Respondents Professional Group Categorization
Professional Frequency Percentage Professional Frequen
cy
Percentage
Admin officer 161 20% Doctor 65 8%
Executive officer 160 20% Nurse 57 7%
Clerical officer 61 7.5% Typist 16 2%
Medical officer 41 5% Driver 13 1.5%
Planning officer 17 2% Messenger 8 1%
Teacher 81 10% Information officer 20 2.5%
Finance clerk 21 2.5% Lab Attendant 56 7%
Statistician 17 2% Accountants 8 2%
Total 810 100%
Source: Field survey 2011.
63
Table five above, gives the categorization of respondents according to
professional groups. It clearly shows that the study reported in this research
indicated the views of respondents with different professional groups as
represented in the sample unit.
Section B
Table 4.2.6: Perceived Corruption in Nigeria
Response Grading Frequency Percentage
Yes 560 69%
No 250 31%
Total 810 100%
Source: Survey 2011
Respondents were to ascertain the presence of corruption in the country.
Their responses as presented on the table above clearly shows that majority of the
respondents totaling five hundred and sixty (560) representing sixty nine percent
(69%) are of the view that there is corruption in Nigeria, while the remaining two
hundred and fifty (250) respondents, representing only thirty one percent (31%)
are in disagreement with the majorities’ opinion.
Table 4.2.7: Understanding of the word Corruption
Response Grading Frequency Percentage
Bribing, which means illegal giving out and taking of money 336 41%
stealing/embezzlement of public funds 127 17%
Misappropriation of fund 65 8%
Immoral act/indiscipline 76 9.5%
Inability of a person to perform their job or duty justly 67 8%
Cheating people 36 4%
Disobeying rules and constitution 62 8%
Taking things that do not belong to you 40 5%
Total 810 100
Source: Field survey 2011
64
Respondents where asked to state what they understand by the word
corruption. About three hundred and thirty six (136) respondents, representing
forty one percent (41%) described corruption as bribery, while one hundred and
twenty seven (127) respondents, representing seventeen percent (17%) described
corruption as stealing and embezzlement, sixty five (65) respondents, representing
eight percent (8%) described corruption as misappropriation of funds, while
seventy six (76) respondents, representing nine percent (9%) described corruption
as immoral act and indiscipline, inability of parsons to perform their duty justly is
the description of corruption by sixty seven (67) respondents, representing eight
percent (8%), while thirty six (36) respondents, representing four percent (4%)
described corruption as cheating people. The remaining sixty two (62) respondents
representing eight percent (8%) and forty (40) respondents, representing five
percent (5%) described corruption as disobeying constitution and taking things
that do not belong to you respectively as presented on the table above:
Table 4.2.8: What are considered to be the main causes of corruption?
Response Grading Frequency Percentage
Poverty/hunger 360 45%
Greed/selfish interest 316 39%
Bad leadership/lack of good leadership 25 3%
Laziness 26 3%
Influence of money 28 3%
Tribalism 26 3%
Economic system of the country 16 2%
Fear/thinking of old age 13 2%
Total 810 100
Source: field survey 2011.
The above table shows that, poverty/hunger which is the opinion of three
hundred and sixty (360) respondents, representing forty five percent (45%) and
65
greediness/selfishness which constituted the position of three hundred and sixty
(360) respondents, representing thirty nine percent (39%) respectively are the
main causes of corruption.
We may add that, behaviour that will be considered corrupt is likely to be
more prominent in less developed countries because of a variety of condition
involved in their underdevelopment; great inequality in the distribution of wealth;
political office as the primary means of gaining access to wealth; conflict between
changing moral codes; the weakness of social and governmental enforcement
mechanisms, and the absence of strong sense of national community.
Table 4.2.9: Perceived Presence of Institutional Mechanisms to Combating
Corruption.
Responses Grading Frequency Percentage
Yes 581 72%
No 229 28%
Total 810 100%
Source: Field survey 2011.
Respondents were asked whether they have noticed the presence of
institutional mechanism for combating corruption in the public service. Their
responses are presented on Table nine above; it shows that majority totaling five
hundred and eighty one (581) respondents, representing seventy two percent
(72%) noticed the presence of anti corruption agencies, while the remaining two
hundred and twenty nine (229) respondents, representing twenty eight percent
(28%) do not notice the presence of institutional mechanisms for combating
corruption in the public service.
66
Table 4.2.10: Effectiveness of Agencies Fighting Corruption
Responses Don’t know Very ineffective Ineffective Effective Very
effective
ICPC 28 80 212 403 85
EFCC 4 14 43 287 462
BPP 142 188 228 168 82
CCB 23 203 280 155 149
Source: Field Survey 2011
Respondents were asked to rate the effectiveness of the various agencies
fighting corruption in the public service. The table above shows the respondents
views, comparatively; the most effective of the agencies set up to fight corruption
have been the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and Independent
Corrupt Practice and other Related Offences Commission.
Table: 4.2.11: The rate of Corruption in Public Service before Establishing
ICPC EFCC and BPP
Responses grading Frequency Percentage
Very high 442 55%
High 240 30%
Moderate 82 10%
Low 34 4%
Very low 12 1%
Total 810 100%
Source: Field survey 2010
In assessing the rate of corruption before the establishment of the anti
corruption institution. Respondents were asked to rate the level of corruption in
the public service. The responses reveal that four hundred and forty two (442)
respondents, representing fifty five percent (55%) argued that, corruption was very
high, while two hundred forty (240) respondents, representing thirty percent (30%)
67
maintained that corruption was high. Eighty two (82) of the respondents,
representing ten percent (10%) perceived the level of corruption to be moderate,
while the remaining thirty four (34) respondents, representing four (4%) and
twelve (12) respondents, representing one percent (1%) views the corruption rate
to be low and very low respectively. The table eleven above shows this clearly.
Table 4.2.12: Perceived Current Level of Corruption in the Public Service
with the Establishment of Anti Corruption Agencies.
Responses grading Frequency Percentage
Very high 306 38%
High 85 10%
Moderate 323 40%
Low 55 7%
Very low 41 5%
Total 810 100
Source: Field survey.
Respondents were further required to rate the current corruption level in
Nigerian public service with the establishment of the various anti corruption
agencies. The responses generated from this showed that, forty one (41)
respondents, representing five percent (5%) argued that corruption is very low,
while fifty five (55) respondents, representing seven (7%) maintained that the
level of corruption is low. Majority of the respondents as high as three hundred
and twenty three (323) representing forty percent (40%) held that, the level of
corruption is moderate. However eighty five (85) respondents, representing ten
percent (10%) are of the view that corruption level is high, while the remaining
three hundred and six (306) respondents, representing thirty eight percent (38%)
rated corruption very high. Table twelve above represents such information.
68
Table 4.2.13: Transparency International Corruption Ranking for Nigeria;
1999-2007.
S/N Year CPI No of
survey
used
No of
Countries
Ranking Remark(s)
1 1999 1.6 __ 99 98 Ranked ninety eight in terms of
accountability and transparency but 2nd
most corrupt of the 99 countries covered.
2 2000 1.2 4 90 90 Last in public accountability but first in
corruption
3 2001 1.0 4 91 90 Ninetieth in accountability but second in
corruption out of 99 countries covered.
4 2002 1.6 6 102 101 Ranked 101 in accountability but 2nd
in
corruption out of the 102 countries
5 2003 1.4 9 133 132 Ranked 132 in accountability but 2nd
in
corruption out of the 133 countries
covered
6 2004 1.6 9 145 144 Ranked 144 in public accountability but
2nd
in corruption out of the 145 countries
7 2005 1.9 9 158 152 Ranked 152 in terms of public
accountability but 6th
in corruption out of
158 countries covered.
8 2006 2.2 __ 163 142 Ranked 142 in public accountability but
21st in corruption out of 163 countries
covered
9 2007 2.2 8 179 147 Ranked 147 in public accountability but
32nd
in corruption out of 179 countries
covered.
Source: Extracted from Transparency International Corruption perceptions Index
(1999 -2007).
69
At this point, the researchers relied on the report of the Berlin-based
Transparency International (World Leading Anti-Corruption Watchdog)
established in 1993. The organization uses the perception of knowledgeable
respondents, local and expatriate residents, business elites, scholars and country
analysts. The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) used reflects the perceived
levels of corruption in the Nigerian public service. The CPI gathers data from
sources that span the last five years and ranges between ten (10) (highly clean) and
zero (O) (highly corrupt).
The Table thirteen, shows that, for the nine years (1999 - 2007) and for the
number of countries covered in each of them, Nigeria was once the most corrupt
(2000), five times second most corrupt (1999, 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004).
However she was dropped to the sixty most corrupt in 2005, twenty first in 2006
and thirty second in 2007.
Table 4.2.14: Level of Autonomy
Responses grading Frequency Percentage
Strongly agreed 78 10%
Agreed 220 27%
Disagreed 170 21%
Strongly disagreed 342 42%
Total 810 100%
Source: field survey
Respondent’s reaction to the autonomy of the various anti corruption
mechanism is measured. The responses reveal that only seventy eight (78)
respondents, representing ten percent (10%) strongly agreed, while two hundred
and twenty (220) respondents, representing twenty seven percent (27%) agreed
that anti corruption agencies has autonomy. However one hundred and seventy
(170) respondents, representing twenty one percent (21%) disagreed, while the
remaining majority that constituted three hundred and forty two (342) respondents,
70
representing forty two percent (42%) strongly disagreed. Table fourteen above
shows this information in a tabular form.
Table 4:2.15: Level of Control over Staff of the various anti Corruption
Agencies.
Responses grading Frequency Percentage
Strongly agreed 138 17.3%
Agreed 214 26.4%
Disagreed 327 40.3%
Strongly disagreed 130 16%
Total 810 100
Source: Field survey 2011.
Respondents were asked to rate the level at which the various institutional
mechanism for combating corruption controlled their staff. The responses revealed
that one hundred and thirty (130) respondents, representing sixteen percent (16%)
strongly disagreed that anti corruption agencies does not have control over their
staff while, three hundred and twenty seven (327) respondents, representing forty
point three percent (40.3%) disagreed that the anti corruption agencies has no
control over their staff. However two hundred and forty (240) respondents,
representing twenty six point four percent (26.4%) agreed that the institutional
mechanisms for combating corruption has control over their staff, while the
remaining one hundred and thirty eight (138) respondents, representing just
seventeen point three percent (17.3%) strongly agreed that the anti corruption
mechanisms has control over their staff. Table thirty above shows this clearly.
71
Table 4.2.16: Rating the General Performances of the Anti Corruption
Agencies.
Responses grading Frequency Percentage
Very high 122 15%
High 224 28%
Moderate 294 36%
Low 96 12%
Very low 74 9%
Total 810 100
Source: field survey 2011
Rating the performances of the anti corruption agencies on the general note.
One hundred and twenty two (122) respondents, representing fifteen percent 15%
posit that, the agencies performed very high, while two hundred and twenty four
(224) respondents; representing twenty eight percent (28%) rated them high.
Majority of the respondent totaling two hundred and ninety four (294)
representing thirty six (36%) goes with moderate, while ninety six (96)
respondents, representing twelve percent (12%) rated the agencies low, the
remaining seventy four (74) respondents which represent just nine percent (9%)
maintained that their performances are very low. The information is presented on
the table sixteen above.
Table 4.2.17: Ways of improving the Performances of the Anti-corruption
Agencies
Responses Frequency Percentage
Autonomy 485 60%
Training and Re-Training 219 27%
Provision of crime fighting facilities 106 13%
Total 810 100
Source: Field Survey 2011.
72
The respondents were asked to choose what they considered as ways of
improving the performance of the various institutional mechanisms for combating
corruption in Nigerian Public Service. Majority view of four hundred and eighty
five (485) respondents, representing sixty (60%) argued that, the autonomy of the
agencies must be improved, while two hundred and ninety (219) respondents,
representing twenty seven (27%) were of the view that, the only way of improving
these institutional mechanisms is through training and retraining. However the
remaining one hundred and six (106) respondents, representing thirteen (13%)
advocate for the provision of crime fighting facilities as the panacea for
improvement. Table seventeen presented the information above.
4.3 Test of Hypothesis
From the aforementioned level of corruption before the establishment of
Anti corruption agencies as rated by the respondents, relationship between
establishment of institutional mechanisms for combating corruption as an
independent variable and rate of corruption in Nigerian public service as a
dependent variable are analyzed. This is to permit the establishment of possible
correlation that might exist between the variable contained in the hypothesis.
Corruption in Nigerian public service as reported in this study is accepted to be
very high while the establishment of institutional mechanisms for combating has
succeeded in reducing the rate to an extent. This has proved the efficiency of the
anti corruption machineries, although there is needs for some improvement.
The statistical tool used to test the hypothesis is chi-square (x2). The
hypothesis is tested using statement on table 4.1.12.
The Chi-square (X2) formula is;
X2 =
( )
∑
∑−∑
2O
Where: O = Observed frequency
∑ = Expected frequency
73
Expected = rolls ofNumber
frequency observed of Sum
E = 1605
810
N
O==
The level of significance which chi is measured is 0.05 (that is 0.5%)
DF (Degree of Freedom) = RC
Where R = Rolls
C = Columns
Table 4.3.1: Computation of Chi-Value (X2)
Responses Observed (O) Expected
(E)
O - E (O -∑)2
E
2)- (O ∑
Very high 306 162 144 20736 128
High 85 162 -77 5929 34.74
Moderate 323 162 161 25921 160.06
Low 55 162 -107 11449 71.55
Very low 41 162 -121 14641 90.37
Total 810 810 0 (X2) 484.72
Thus df = (r – 1) (c – 1)
df = (5 – 1) (2 – 1) = 4
Thus, critical value of (X2) = O.711
Calculated value of(X2) = 484.72
Decision
Since the obtained X2 of 484.72 is greater than the critical value of 0.711,
required for significance, at the 0.05 level of significance, for df, this value is
significant so we reject the null hypothesis (Ho). Consequently, we can conclude
that there is relationship between the establishment of institutional mechanisms for
combating corruption and the rate of corruption in Nigerian public service.
74
4.4 Findings/Discussion
Finding of this study as presented on table 6 shows that, the level of
corruption seems to be very high in Nigeria as a society, but specifically singled
out the Public Sector as been more corrupt. This is in agreement with scholars like,
Agalamanyi (2002) who postulate that, in Nigerian public service, corruption has
played an active part in stunting the growth of the nation, Achebe (1983) who
acknowledges the alarming rate of corruption in Nigeria and Amujiri (2003) who
rightly noted, one of the most fundamental problems facing Nigeria today is
corruption. These constitute one of the reasons why public accountability is never
a priority in Nigeria.
It was revealed in table 5 that the most common form of corruption known
is bribery and is closely followed by misappropriation and embezzlement of public
funds by government officials and politicians. In our country “Nigeria” on day to
day interaction with public officer’s illegal money is being offered and/or accepted
to deliver services that should have been delivered for free.
This study exposed some diverse excuses for becoming involved in corrupt
practices by Nigerian public servants, although some may consider it to be the
causes of corruption as stated in table 7. These excuses or causes are clear
departure from what is given as factors responsible for corruption by Amujiri
(2002), Aboyed (1971), Anugwon (2002) and African Development Bank (2006).
The table 7 is of the opinion that poverty/hunger and greediness/selfishness are the
main causes of corruption in the public service. Because of selfishness, corrupt
people turn a blind eye to the suffering that their corrupt practices inflict on others,
justifying bribery simply because they themselves benefit from it. Another factor
responsible for corrupt practices in the Nigerian public service is fear of aging.
Until recently the pensions system in Nigeria has been in crisis. Many retire from
active service in their sixties and are unable to access their pensions and other
sums owing to them for years on end. Coupled with the very low wages paid for
75
public service, civil servants tell themselves they have to prepare for the future
given a system of pensions they are almost certain will not provide for them.
Experience has it that, behaviour that will be considered corrupt is likely to
be more prominent in less developed countries because of a variety of condition
involved in their underdevelopment; great inequality in the distribution of wealth;
political office as the primary means of gaining access to wealth; conflict between
changing moral codes; the weakness of social and governmental enforcement
mechanisms, and the absence of strong sense of national community. In a related
view Aboyade (1971) rightly noted that, “the great difficulty in financing parties
causes corruption”. In our own contexts, the time leg between new regulations and
their enforcement, and loopholes discovered in laws and rules, create condition for
corruption practices. Another strong factor which is the assumption of the
researcher is where people use their wealth to buy political power or to occupy
formal or informal position of political influence, there is often a desire to
corruptly replenish spent wealth and to reconverts such a political position to an
economic resource.
It has been revealed that, the people were quite impressed with the
performance of government agencies set up to combat corruption and specifically
mentioned the Independent Corrupt Practices and other Related Offences
Commission (ICPC) and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission
(EFCC) as agencies they believed to be effective in fighting corruption. This is
noted in table 9.
Table 10, 11 and 12 shows that, the establishment of anti-corruption
mechanisms haves reduced corruption in Nigerian Public Service to an extent. The
data gather from Transparency International exposed Nigeria position on the
would corruption chart which on several occasions Nigeria were ranked first and
second most corrupt country. However, there was little improvement in 2005,
2000 and 2007 when she descended to sixth, twenty first and thirty second
prostitution respectively. Although the 2.2 in 2006 and 2007 out of 10.0 at the
76
Corruption Perception Index (CPI) is very low, it does not show any remarkable
improvement in accountability and transparency in public service.
This study revealed that, the anti corruption agencies does not have
reasonable level of autonomy as shown in Tables 14 and 15, over seventy five
(75%) of there staff are drown from other government establishment like Nigerian
Police, State Security Services (SSS) Customs Service (CS) Immigration, Central
Bank of Nigeria (CBN) etc and as such, the staff could be recalled by the mother
organization anytime. The recalled could be at a time the particular staff is
undertaking a sensitive assignment for the agencies. Worst hit by like of control
over staff is EFCC whose chairman, a widely a claimed anti-corruption cezar was
sent on compulsory study leave. Sections and parts of the law establishing almost
all institutional mechanisms for combating corruption in the public service has
given wider power to the Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF) to interfere at
will with operations of these agencies making him a mini-god in the temple of
justice. Specifically, the part 61 of the Independent Corrupt Practices and other
Related Offences Commission (ICPC) Act provides that “Every prosecution for an
offence under the act or any other law prohibiting bribery, corruption and other
related offences shall be deemed to be done with the consent of the Attorney
General of the Federation, while section 39 of the EFCC ACT empower AGF to
“makes rules or regulation with respect to the exercise of any of the duties,
functions or powers of the commission”. To worsen an already bad situation, the
Attorney-General of the Federation under section 174 (1-3) of the 1999
constitution as amended has been given so much power such that, he can takeover,
truncate, discontinue any criminal proceeding undertaken by any organization in
the country. This has decimated the powers of the various anti corruption
machineries and slowed down their activities. This provision must have tempted
the former Attorney General of the Federation Michael Aondoakaa SAN to
declare that, all anti-corruption agencies must report to him; this has emboldened
him to interfere in the trial of former Abia State Governor (Uzor Kalu) and the
77
investigation of his Delta State Counterpart (James Ibori) (Tell October, 2007: 15).
This political interference could also be said to have led to the remover of the
former chairman of one of anti corruption agencies, Nuhu Ribadu from the office
before the expiration of his statutory second term.
Table 17 provides that, the various anti corruptions should be given full
autonomy to operate, the autonomy could be in the area of funding, recruitment,
prosecution without interference and the security of tenure of management staff.
Emphasis should also be placed on the area of training and retraining of staff in
modern way of crime fighting. This argument is in line with the fact that, most of
the staff deployed to function in various anti-corruption agencies are from
Nigerian Police. Professional training after recruitment in the police last between
three to six months (Police Regulation 1968). This training by any standard can be
considered short, and arise doubts about its adequacy considering the nature of the
duties recruits would be assigned. Finally crime fighting facilities should also be
made adequately to staff and officers of the anti-corruption machineries.
The results of the chi-square (X2) test (table 18) shows that the null
hypothesis is rejected. Hence there is a significant relationship between the
establishment of institutional mechanisms for combating corruption and the rate of
corruption in Nigerian public service. This have shows that the anti corruption
agencies established for the purpose of combating corruption has performed up to
expectation to an extent, but needs some amount of autonomy and level of
improvement.
78
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION
5.4 Summary
The central argument contained here is that, the issue of corruption has
dominated much of public and private discussions in Nigeria in the last thirteen
years of Nigerian return to democracy. It also constitutes the substance of much of
the publications in the Nigerian dailies. Indeed, corruption together with its twin
sister bribery appear to be stock in trade in official dealings in Nigeria, and is seen
as a ‘canker worm’ that is very much affecting the standards of discipline and
morale in Nigerian Public Service. Examining the contentions of scholars and
public commentators on the perils of corruption in Nigeria, it is bravely adduced
that Nigeria has been unable to fashion an effective institutional mechanism of
controlling corruption in the Public Service within the past five decades or so.
Two hypothetical postulations viz: there is no significant relationship between the
establishment of institutional mechanisms for combating corruption and the rate of
corruption in Nigerian Public Service and there is a significant relationship
between the establishment of institutional mechanisms for combating corruption
and the rate of corruption in Nigeria Public Service. The questions generated by
the study are; does the established institutional mechanisms for combating
corruption in Nigeria has any effect on the level of corruption in the Nigerian
Public Service? How effective are these institutional mechanisms established in
combating corruption in the Nigerian Public service? What are the problems
associated with the effective functioning of these institution? And what can be
done in making these institutional mechanisms more effective?
The main aim pursued by the study is to critically assess the institutional
mechanisms for combating corruption in the Nigerian Public Service. The specific
objectives the work achieved are; to find out the extent to which the ant-corruption
mechanisms has gone in the fight against corruption in the public service,
ascertain their efficacy, to identify the problems militating against their effective
79
performance and to make recommendation that will strengthened these
institutional mechanisms for combating corruption thereby, reducing the malaise
in the Nigerian Pubic Service.
5.2 Recommendations
In view of the research findings, the following recommendations are made
as measure to enhance the efficiency of the various institutional mechanisms for
fighting corruption.
There should be explicit compulsory public declaration of assets and
liabilities of, especially holders of statutory position in the Nigerian Public Service
to enable the citizens and the mass media report cases of non-compliance by such
officers to the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB). This calls for a review of the law
establishing the CCB and the 1999 constitution as amended.
The anti corruption agencies also need greater operational autonomy. This
will enable them discharge their responsibility at a greater pace. Particularly the
provision that the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) make rules and
regulation in respect to any functions and duties of the agencies should be
revisited. All anti-corruption cases should be investigated and prosecuted by anti
corruption agencies without recourse to an individual in the capacity of AGF.
The overwhelming majority of the staff of the anti-corruption agencies if
not all, should be recruited from the pool of graduates and by the agencies
themselves instead of mass transfers and secondments from other government
organization. This mass transfers and secondments would only transform the new
organization into where they are transferred from. Thus, fresh graduates should be
trained from the scratch towards an appreciation of the importance and objectives
of the anti-corruption agencies. Similarly, the agencies independence with regard
to funds, human and material resources should also be guaranteed.
Section 25 of the Independent Corrupt Practice and other Related Offence
Commission (ICPC) Act that deals with the investigation of chief executive and
their deputies in event of contravention of the act will lead to pervasion of justice
80
as the chief executive may escape punishment. This is considering the political
economy of Nigeria. This Act need to be revisited since the ICPC Act does not
confer immunity on anybody. Section, 308 of the 1999 constitution as amended,
needs to be equally revisit.
The public procurement Act also needs to be amended to extend its scope
to other level of government (state and local government). This will make the fight
against corruption more encompassing.
Since corruption has gone international in Nigeria, there is need for the
anti-corruption agencies in corroboration with government to adopt a coordinated
multi-level response to reinforce national efforts. These include the United Nation
(UN) Convention against Corruption, the Extractive Industry Transparency
Initiative (EITI); the African Union (AU) Convention against Corruption and
Related Offences; and the World Bank Stolen Asset Recovery (STAR) initiative
among others.
On a general not, there is also the need for reform of political parties, the
courts, and the police for serious lack of confidence of these public institutions.
Other includes reform of civil society organization and the mass media. A timely
enforcement of Freedom of the Information Bill (FIB) is needed to make these
organizations more effective as potent weapons of the anti-corruption war. There
is the need for societal value re-orientation of the entire citizenry about the public
service. This is because rules, regulations and other institutional structures are not
enough to fight corruption. Mass mobilization is essential in this regard.
Strong political leadership at all levels that is committed to actually fighting
corruption is required at all levels of government to successfully combat
corruption in the Nigerian Public Service. Strong legislature and judiciary is
needed to enforce sanctions. Strict rules and funding of political parties and
electoral campaign should be put in place so that; money cannot buy power any
longer in Nigeria. The fight against-corruption should be sustained since positive
result can only be achieved with continuous effort.
81
5.3 Conclusion
In conclusion, we discovered that there is high level of corruption in the
public service which is rationalize by flimsy excuse like poverty, hunger, greed as
well as selfish interest, bad leadership, tribalism, economic system of the country,
influence of money, laziness and thinking of old age among others. Corruption in
public services had been on the increase since the country independence which the
greater number of years was presided over by the military that have opportunity to
loot the nation’s treasury. The return to a civilian democratic political system in
1999 does not make any significant difference. Nigerians yearn for the dividends
of democracy; rather they continue to reap the cost of corruption. Although it is
acknowledge that the various anti corruption mechanisms could not achieved
much due to endogenous and exogenous forces that has been exerting influence on
the operations of the anti-corruption agencies. We submitted that, the
establishment of institutional mechanisms for combating corruption in Nigerian
public service has been able to redefine the position of Nigeria on the world
corrupt chart as evident by Transparency Perception Index and the result of the
hypothesis tested. The country’s corruption perception Index (CPI) staggered
between 1.0 in 2001 to the higher of 2.2 in 2006 and 2007. This represents a
dismal performance of 22% which is below a pass mark.
82
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books
Achebe, C. (1983) The Trouble with Nigeria, Enugu: Fourth Dimension
Publishing Co. Ltd.
Adamolekun, L. (2002) “Central Government Organization” in Adamolekun L.
(ed) Public Administration in Africa: Main Issue and Selected Country
Studies. Ibadan: Spectrum Books Limited.
Adamolekun, L. (2006) Politics Bureaucracy and Development in Africa, Ibadan:
Spectrum Books Ltd.
Adebayo A. (2004) Power in Politics, Ibadan: Spectrum Books Ltd.
Adejo A.M. (2010) “The Education and Development Potentials of Benue State”
in Atah, P. (ed) Milestones in Leadership: Essays in Honor of Government
Gabriel Suswam. Mokurdi: Aboki Publishers.
Ademoyega, A. (1981) Why we Struck .Lagos: Kearney Morris Publishing Co.
Agalamanyi, C.U (2002) “Corruption: A Focus on the Nigerian Economy” in
Ngwu, C.O.T. (ed) Corruption in Nigeria: Critical Perspectives, A Book of
Reading. Nsukka: Chuka Educational Publishers.
Ali, Y.O. (2007) “The Anti-Graft War” in Saliu, H., Amali, E., Olawepo, R. (eds)
Nigeria’s Reform Programme; Issues and Challenges. Ilorin: Faulty of
Business and Social Science, University of Ilorin.
Amujiri, B.A. (2002) “Corruption in the Government Circle” in Ugwu C.O. (ed)
Corruption in Nigeria: Critical Perspectives, A Book of Reading. Nsukka:
Chuka Educational Publishers.
Ango, A. (1986) “Corruption: The Great Obstacle to National Development” in
Odekunle, F (ed) Nigeria: Corruption in Development. Ibadan: University
Press.
Anifowose, R. (1982) Violence and Politics in Nigeria: The Tiv and Yoruba
Experience. Enugu: NOK Publishers (Nigeria) Ltd.
83
Anugwon E.E (2002) “The Normalcy of Vice: The Public Sector and Corruption
in Nigeria” in Ugwu C.O.T (ed) Corruption in Nigeria: Critical
Perspectives: A Book of Reading. Nsukka: Chuka Educational Publishers.
Anyebe, A.A. (2007) Public Administration in Nigeria: Challenges and Issues.
Zaria: Shereef Salam Press.
Armstrong, W. (1970) The Role and Character of the Civil Service. London:
Oxford University Press.
Asika, N. (2006) Research Methodology in the Behavioral Sciences, Lagos:
Longman Nigeria Plc.
Atah P. (2008) ed. The Democratic Transformation of Benue State: 2007-2008.
Makurdi: Aboki Publishers.
Beethan, D. (1987) Bureaucracy, Boston: Open University Press.
Bello, Imam, I.B (2005) The War against Corruption in Nigeria: Problems and
Prospects. Ibadan: College Press and Publisher Ltd.
Braibanti, R. (1966) “Transnational Inducement of Administrative Reform; A
Survey of Scope and Critique of Issues” in Montgomery J.D. and Siffin,
W.J. (ed) Approaches to Development; Politics, Administration and
Change, New York: McGraw: Hill Book Company.
Buah, P.A. (1999) A Hand Book of Civil Service Rules: a Practical Guide.
Makurdi: Onaivi Printing and Publishing Co Ltd.
Dudley, B.I. (1982) An Introduction to Nigerian Government and Politic, London:
Macmillan Press.
Eghe, E.V. (2002) Rudiment of Public Administration Kaduna: Joyce Graphic
Printers and Publishers Co.
Ezeme P.C. (2002) “The Catholic Church and the Fight against Corruption in
Nigeria” in Ugwu C.O.T. (ed) Corruption in Nigeria: Critical Perspectives.
A Book of Readings Nsukka: Chuka Educational Publishers.
Gyosugh, L.U. and Amenger, S.H.(2010) Suswan and Women Development in
Benue State Makurdi: Aboki Publishers.
84
Iorhemen, I. P. (2008) Anti – Corruption Crusade and Public Accountability in
Nigeria: An Overview of Economic and Financial Crimes Commission
(EFCC); An Unpublished, B.A. Project, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.
Johnson, D.B. (1991) Public Choice: An Introduction to the New Political
Economy. Mountain View: Bristle Cone Books.
Kruegar, A. O. (1993) Political Economy of Policy Reform in Developing
Countries. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mauro, P. (1995) Corruption and Growth, Uk: Burham University Press Ltd.
Monoh, C.S., (1991) Philosophy of a New Past and an Old Future. Auch: African
Philosophy Projects Publications.
Ngwuoke, E. (2001) Politic and Religion: A Christian Perspective Enugu:
SNAAP Press.
Niskanem W.A. (1971) Bureaucratic and Representative Government. Chicago:
Aldin-Authority.
Nkom, S. A. (1986) “Ethical Revolution? – The Futility of Bourgeois Idealism” in
Adekunle, F. (ed) Nigeria: Corruption in Development. Ibadan: University
Press.
Nwachukwu, R. (1987) The Agony, Texas: Good Hope Enterprise.
Nwakanma, B. (1986) ”An Assessment of Legal Provisions of Controlling
Corruption in Nigeria” in Adekunle, F. (ed) Nigeria: Corruption in
Development, Ibadan: University Press.
Odey, J.O. (2001) The Anti-Corruption Crusade: The Sage of a Crippled Giant.
Enugu SNAAP Press Ltd.
Okpaga, A. (2005) “The Politics and Development of Sub-Cultural Groups in
Benue State”, In Lyam A. (ed) Benue State in Perspective. Makurd: Aboki
Publishers.
Okwor, S.O. (2000) “Identification of Forms of Corruption and Suggestions on
How to Stop Corruption in our Society” in Onu, C.O.K. (ed) The
Millennium Hope for the Afflicted in Nsukka Diocese. Nsukka: SODEJUPE
Publication.
85
Olakanm, and Co. (2006) Ant-Corruption Compendium, Abuja: Law lords
Publication.
Olaopa, J. (2008) Theory and Practice of Public Administration and Civil Service
Reforms in Nigeria, Ibadan: Spectrum Books Ltd.
Onuh, E. (2000) “War Against Corruption” in Onuh, C.O (ed) The Millennium
Hope for the Afflicted Nsukka: SODEJUPE Publication.
Onyewuenyi, I. (2000) “The Legislator as the People’s Representative in the
Democratic System of Government” in Onuh, C.O.K. (ed) The Millennium
Hope for the Afflicted in Nsukka Diocese. Nsukka: SODJUPE Publication.
Otite, O. (1986) “On the Sociological Study of Corruption” in Odekunle, F. (ed)
Nigeria, Corruption in Development Ibadan: University Press.
Shehu, A. (2006) Economic and Financial Crimes in Nigeria: Policy Issues and
Option. Lagos: National Open University of Nigeria.
Ugwu, C.O.T. (2002) “Forms of Corruption in Nigeria: The Way Forward”, in
Ugwu C.O.T. (ed). Corruption in Nigeria: Critical Perspectives, A Book of
Reading. Nsukka: Chuka Educational Publish.
Uza, V. (2010) “Agriculture in Benue State Since 1976” in Pine A. (ed)
Milestones in Leadership: Essays in Honour of Governor Gabriel Suswan.
Makurdi Aboki Publisher
Vanden, H.L. (2000) “Public Choice, Constitutional Politic, Economics and Law”
in Bouckaert, B. D. Geest, G (ed) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics:
The History and Methodology of Law and Economics. Vol.1
Werner, S.B. (1983) New Direction in the Study of Public Administrative
Corruption. UK: Edward Edger Publishing Limited.
World Bank (1997) World Development Report: The State in a Changing world.
Washington D.C: World Bank.
Wraith and Simpkins, E.(1963) Corruption in Developing Countries. London:
George Allen and Irwin Limited.
86
Journals
Alabi, M.O.A. and Fashajba, J.Y. (2010) “The Legislature and Anti-Corruption
Crusade Under the Fourth Republic of Nigeria: Constitutional and Practical
Regalities”, International Journal of Politics and Good Government
VOL.I, No. 1. pp 1-27.
Alam, M.S. (1989) “Anatomy of Corruption: An Approach to the Political
Economic of Under Development”, American Journal of Economic and
Sociology vol. 48 No. 4. pp 10.
Anugwom, E.E. (1977) “Organization and Environment in Nigeria: The
Corruption Potency”, in Nigeria Journal of Management and the Social
Science. Vol.2, No1 pp 6.
Bohannan, P. (1955) “Tiv Political and Religious Ideas”, South West Journal of
Anthropology Vol. 11, No. 2 pp 138.
Idries, M. (2008) “Public Service Reform and Public Accountability in Nigerian”,
The Nigerian Journal of Administrative Studies. Ahmadu Bello University,
Zaria Vol. 5, No. 2 pp 7-10.
Jackson, P. M. (1988) “Economic of Public Service: Public Choice and Public
Sector” Public Mange Vol. 10. pp 13-20.
Johnston, M. (1996) “The Search for Definitions: The Vitality Politics and the
issue of Corruption”, International Social Science Journal Vol. 149. pp 37.
Khan, M. (1996) “A Typology of Corruption Transaction in Developing
Countries”, IDS Bulletin Vol. 27, No 2. pp 14.
Leff, N.H. (1964) “Economic Development through Bureaucratic Corruption”,
The American Beheviou Scientist Vol. 3, No. 3. pp 8.
Nye, T.S. (1967) “Corruption and Political Development: A Cost Benefit
Analysis”. American Political Science Review Vol. 61, No. 2.pp 5-491.
Ocheje, P.D. (2001) “Law and Social Change: A Socio-Legal Analysis of
Nigeria’s Corrupt Practices and other Related Offences Act, 2000” Journal
of African Law Vol. 45, No 2 pp 174-195.
87
Government Publications
Benue State Reform Team (2002) Benue Profile and Institutional Assessment.
Benue State Reform Team (2002) Poverty in Benue State: a Preliminary
Assessment Based on Secondary Sources.
Benue State Reform Team (2002) Poverty in Benue: From Analysis to Action.
BPSR,(2007) Nigerian Public Service Reform; Answers to sixty six Frequently
Asked Questions on Public Service Reform. Abuja.
Chief Udoji, J.O. (1997) Public Service Review Commission Main Report, Printed
by the Federal Ministry of Information, Lagos September.
F.R.N (1999) Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Lagos: Federal
Government Press.
FRN (2000) Corrupt Practices and other Related Offences Act, 2000. Ibadan:
University Press.
FRN (2007) Public Procurement Act, 2007m, Federal Republic of Nigeria Official
Gazette No. 65 Vol. 94, Lagos: The Federal Government Printer.
Mac Donald (1995) “Benue Province: Annual Report” Part 1, Provincial Survey,
1946 Counsel, E.H. Northern Nigeria Provincial Annual Report Kaduna.
World Bank (1997) World Development Report: The State in a Changing World.
Washington D.C: World Bank.
Magazines
Essien, C (2011) “Fraudsters Steal Billion from Banks Vaults” Sunday punch July
7, pp. 18.
Ogundeji, A (2002) “Nigeria and Conundrum of Corruption” the Comet
September, 17. pp 7.
SGF, (2008) Bars Ministries from funding National Assembly’s Activities, The
Punch, Lagos Monday, 19 May.
88
Conference Papers and other Publications
Abdulsalami, I. (1991) “The Structure and Functioning of Government
Bureaucracies in Nigeria” Bing a Lecture Delivered at a Seminar Organized
by Directorate for Social Mobilization, (MAMSER), Katsina State
Directorate, on Wednesday 30th October, At Liyata Palace Hotel
Conference Hall, Katsina.
Aboyede, O. (1971) “The Economic of Bribery and Corruption”, Seminar Outline,
faculty of Social Science University of Ibadan, 13 January.
Abraham, R. C. (1940) The Tiv People. London: OUP.
African Development Bank Group (2006). “Combating Corruption in Africa:
Issues and Challenges”, Concepts Note Paper for the Annual Meetings,
Ouagadougou, Burkinafeso.
African Diaspora Initiative (2007) Anti-corruption and Governance, Training
Module.
Ahmed, M.Y. (2007) “Public Service Perspective on Anti-corruption Crusade and
Promotion of Integrity”, The Special Guest, Head of the Civil Service of
the Federation, at the March Edition of ICPC Chairman Guest Forum,
ICPC Auditorium, on Tuesday, 13th
March.
DFID (1999) Benue State and Local Government Institutional Appraisal
Jones, M. and Kemba, M. (2002) “Assessment of Human Resources in Benue
State Government” DFID CNTR: 000512A/SLGP Consultants’ Report 401.
Rebadu N. (2005) “Sanitizing Nigeria’s Business Environment for Direct Foreign
Investment” Being Paper presented at the South African Business Forum,
on Thursday February 22.
Ribadu, N. (2006) “Nigerians Struggle with Corruption” Being an Abridge and
Edited Version of Presentation to USA Congressional Committee on
International Development, Washington D.C, On May 18.
Websites
Benue State: Back Ground Information. http://www.onlinenigeria.com/links/
benue adv asp?blurb (assessed 10/28/2011).
89
Global Integrity, (2004) Country Report. www.globalintegrity.org/reports/
2004/country (assessed 24/2/2009).
Kelly, L.R. “Rent-Seeking, Public Choice and Persona Dilemma
http://www.friesian.com/rentlited accessed 10/10/2008.
Transparency International Corruption Perception Index, http://www.
transparency.org/survey/index.litmel (Accessed 10/10/2008).
USA/Africa Dialogue (2005) No 526: Nigerian Corruption Saga.
www.Utexas.edu/conference/africa/eds (Accessed 24/2/2009).
Wikipedia Encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wikipublicchoicetheory.
www.benuestate.gov.ng (Accessed 26/11/2011).
90
APPENDIX
University of Nigeria, Nsukka
Faculty of Social Science
Department of Public Administration
and Local Government.
15th
October, 2011.
Sir,
QUESTIONNAIRE
Please, the researcher is a Master of Science (M.Sc.) student in the
Department of Public Administration and Local Government, University of
Nigeria, Nsukka, undertaking a research on “Assessment of Institutional
Mechanisms for Combating Corruption in Nigerian Public Service.”
The research thesis is purely for academic purpose and your answer to any
particular issue will be treated with utmost confidentiality.
Yours faithfully,
Iorhemen Iorchir Peter
Please Tick [ ] as it applies to you.
SECTION “A”
1. Sex: (a) Male [ ] (b) Female [ ]
2. Age: (a) 20 – 35 [ ] (b) 36 – 45 [ ] (c) 46 and above [ ]
3. Marital Status: (a) Married [ ] (b) Single [ ] (c) Divorce [ ]
4. Educational Qualification
(a) WAEC/NECO (SSCE) [ ] (b) ND/NCE [ ]
(c) B.Sc/HND [ ] (d) M. Sc/Ph.D [ ]
5. How long have you been working with the public service
(a) 5years [ ] (b) 5 – 10 years [ ] (c) 10 – 15 years [ ]
(d) 17 – 25 years [ ] (e) 20 – 25 years [ ] (f) 25 years and above [ ]
91
(6) Please kindly state your professional group
(a) __________ (b) __________ (c) _________ (d) _________ (e)___________
(f) ___________ (g)___________ (h) __________ (i) __________ (J)_________
SECTION ‘B’
7. Do you believe there is corruption in Nigeria?
(a) Yes [ ] (b) No [ ]
8. What do you understand by the word corruption?
(a) __________ (b) __________ (c) _________ (d) _________ (e)___________
(f) ___________ (g)___________ (h) __________ (i) __________ (J)_________
9. What do you consider to be the main causes of corruption?
(a) __________ (b) __________ (c) _________ (d) _________ (e)___________
(f) ___________ (g)___________ (h) __________ (i) __________ (J)_________
10. Do you perceived the presence of institutional mechanisms to combating
corruption in the public service?
(a) Yes [ ] (b) No [ ]
11. How do you rate the effectiveness of each of the anti-corruption agencies?
(a). Don’t know [ ] (b) Very ineffective [ ] (c) Ineffective [ ]
(d) Effective [ ] (e) Very effective [ ]
12. What was the rate of corruption in the public service before establishing
ICPC, EFCC and BPP?
(a) Very high [ ] (b) High [ ] (c) Moderate [ ] (e) Low [ ]
(f) Very low [ ]
13. What is the current level of corruption in the public service with the
establishment of anti corruption agencies?
(a) Very high [ ] (b) High [ ] (c) Moderate [ ] (e) Low [ ]
(f) Very low [ ]
14. Do the anti corruption organizations have reasonable autonomy?
(a) Strongly agreed [ ] (b) Agreed [ ] (c) Disagreed [ ]
(e) Strongly disagreed [ ].
92
15. Do the institutional mechanisms for combating corruption have total control
over their staff?
(a) Strongly agreed [ ] (b) Agreed [ ] (c) Disagreed [ ]
(e) Strongly disagreed [ ].
16. What is the general performance of the anti corruption agencies?
(a) Very high [ ] (b) High [ ] (c) Moderate [ ] (e) Low [ ]
(f) Very low [ ]
17. What is the ways of improving the performances of the anti corruption
agencies?
(a) __________ (b) __________ (c) _________ (d) _________ (e)___________
93
Figure 1: ORGANIZATIONAL CHART OF BENUE STATE GOVERNMENT
Source: http://www.onlineniger.com/links/benueadv.esp?blurb=2011
People of Benue
Governor Speaker
Deputy Governor Deputy Speaker
Clerk of the
House Chief of Staff Head of Service
Secretary to the State
Government
Permanent Secretary Assistant to
Governor
Advisor to
Governor
Commissioner
of commerce,
industry &
Tourism
Commissioner
of Agriculture
& Natural
Resources
Commissioner
of
Education
Permanent
Secretary Permanent
Secretary
Permanent
Secretary
Commissioner
of
Finance
Commissioner
of
Health
Commissioner
of
Information
and culture
Commissioner
of
Justice
Commissioner
of
Land and Survey Commissioner
of Rural
Development
and Cooperative
Commissioner
of Water
Resources and
Environment
Permanent
Secretary
Permanent
Secretary
Permanent
Secretary
Permanent
Secretary
Permanent
Secretary
Permanent
Secretary
Permanent
Secretary