Ion 2013 azeem
-
Upload
irfan-azeem -
Category
Technology
-
view
74 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Ion 2013 azeem
First Results of Phase Scintillation from a Longitudinal Chain of ASTRA’s SM-211
GPS TEC and Scintillation Receivers
Irfan Azeem, Geoff Crowley, Adam Reynolds, and Julio Santana, ASTRA, Boulder, CO
Donald Hampton, Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, AK
contact: [email protected]
1
Outline
2
Ionospheric Irregularities
● Introduction● CASES GPS Receiver● Data Used● Results
Scintillation ClimatologyCase Studies: Phase Scintillation
During Auroral EventsScintillation Occurrence Statistics
● Summary and Conclusions
● Atmospheric & Space Technology Research Associates (ASTRA),Boulder, CO
● Small business specializing in space environment modeling/prediction and space technology innovation
ASTRA Core Competencies
Science Technology
Applications Bringing It All Together
3
ASTRA: Overview
Numerical Modeling
Instrument Development
Data Assimilation
Scientific Software
Space Systems
Core Competencies
• Physics-Based Modeling
• Real-Time Specification
• Ionospheric Electron Density
• High-Latitude Electrodynamics
• Satellite and Ground Sensors
• Time-Frequency Analysis
• Wavelet Analysis
• GPSRO
• GPS TEC/Scint†
• HF TID Mapper †
• Low Power Ionosonde
• NSF DICE
• AFRL DIME
• SMC SENSE
• UV Sensor
• Neutral Wind Sensor
† Commercially AvailableCurrently hiring GPS Engineers!
4
Introduction● Significant insights into the structure and evolution of
the ionosphere have been enabled by the increasing use of GPS receivers
● In the US, this development has largely been concentrated in the contiguous states while the high latitude ionosphere has been poorly represented, due primarily to remoteness and lack of infrastructure
● Several GPS receivers (ASTRA CASES model SM-211) were deployed in Alaska, for the purpose of documenting and understanding GPS scintillation at high latitudes, and to study the effects on operational GPS-dependent systems
● Goal is to improve the temporal and spatial resolution of ionospheric remote sensing in a region of poor coverage but of high geospace interest
5
Q. What is the variability of observed GPS scintillations and the observed auroral precipitation in different geophysical regions at high latitudes?
Q. What is the relative contribution of hard and soft auroral precipitation to high latitude GPS phase scintillations?
Introduction
6
CASES GPS
Dual frequency (L1 and L2C)CASES GPS Receiver
● Software radio architecture● Remote reconfigurability● Full control of receiver behavior, products, and
cadences● Specialized tracking loops● Multiple comm. Interfaces● Time to first channel lock
● Cold start ~60s● Hot start ~15s
● Low CostData Type
Per Channel High Rate Data
Per Channel Low Rate Data
Per Channel Scint Params
Other
Default Data Rate 100 Hz 1 Second 60 Seconds 1 SecondConfigurable Rate? Yes, 50 or 100 Hz Yes, >= 1 Second Yes Yes, >= 1 Second
Available Parameters
• Integrated Carrier Phase
• In-Phase Accumulation
• Quadrature Accumulation
• GPS Time
• Receiver Time
• Pseudorange-based TEC• Phase-based delta TEC• Pseudorange• Integrated Carrier Phase• GPS Time, Receiver Time• Doppler Frequency• SV Elevation, SV Azimuth• C/N0• Data Validity Flag, Cycle
Slip Flag• Signal Acquisition Status• PRN, SV Health
• S4
• σϕ
• o
• Scint Power Ratio• GPS Time• Reference Channel
Status• PRN
• Receiver X/Y/Z Position
• Receiver X/Y/Z GPS Time
• Receiver Time• Velocity• Receiver Clock
Error• Receiver Clock
Error Rate• Nav Solution Flag
Connected Autonomous Space Environment Sensor
7
CASES ALASKA CHAIN
● Four CASES GPS receivers deployed in Alaska: November 2012● Kaktovik (70.1° N, 143.6° W) ● Fort Yukon (66.6° N, 145.2° W)● Poker Flat (65.1° N, 147.4° W)● Gakona (62.4° N, 145.2° W).
CASES SM-211 GPS
10M Hz Ref
External Storage
Kaktovik
Fort Yukon
Poker Flat
Gakona
http://cases.astraspace.net
8
Fort Yukon
9
Quiet Conditions
Active Conditions
10
Multi-Instrument Dataset
RESULTS
11
Phase scintillation results from Alaska CASES GPS receivers.
We also show auroral emission data from an All-Sky Imager (ASI) and a meridian spectrograph, both located at PFRR.
The auroral emission data is correlated with phase scintillation measurements to show correspondence between auroral activity and scintillation severity.
Results
12
Climatology Bin data into 30-min
segments for each day of observations
Elevation mask of 20°1. Severity of phase
scintillation decreases with decreasing latitude.
2. Largest phase scintillations occur near magnetic midnight.
3. Time of peak scintillation occurrence at KAK and FYU shifts slightly to later local time from November to February.
13
CASES STUDIES
Measurements from CASES Alaskan chain also highlighted several discrete events when all CASES GPS receivers recorded elevated phase scintillations.
Strong scintillation was seen on November 14th, November 20th, December 25th, January 17th, and January 26th, in all four receiver sites.
Phase scintillation data from a few selected dates and show measurements of auroral conditions prevailing in the Alaskan sector on these days.
14
November 12, 2012
Each color indicates a different PRN
Elevation mask of 20° is used
Phase scintillation activity on November 12, 2012 from all four stations in the CASES Alaskan chain.
Kp index was low for majority of the time and increased only moderately after 2100 UT
Increased phase scintillation at Kaktovik, Fort Yukon, and Poker Flat after 2100 UT
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
15
November 12, 2012
Auroral emission intensities at three discrete wavelengths, 577.7 nm, 427.8 nm, and 630.0 nm, are shown
Auroral activity on November 12, 2012 measured by the PFRR meridian spectrograph.
Most of the auroral activity was observed poleward of 67° N.
(a)
(b)
(c)
1 sec integration at each elevation
The altitudes for the figures are 100 km for 427.8 nm, 110 km for 557.7 and 250 km for 630.0 nm.
16
November 12, 2012
Two scintillation events observed in Kaktovik data (at1000 UT and 1400 UT)
Enhancements in sigma_phi appears to be associated with the brightening of red line auroral emission
Locations south of Kaktovik show no significant auroral activity and no scintillations
16
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
17
November 13, 2012
Significant phase scintillation is present on November 13, 2012.
Scintillation strength decreases southward of Kaktovik
Kp = 3+
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
18
November 13, 2012
Auroral intensities of the 557.7 nm and 427.8 nm channels were much weaker than the 6300 nm auroral emission.
The observed correspondence between phase scintillations and the red line intensity enhancements, suggest that the high latitude scintillation events are probably associated with F-region irregularities.
(a)
(b)
(c)
19
November 13, 2012
Auroral activity was located poleward of Poker Flat (65.1° N) and most of the moderate phase scintillation values were also seen at or poleward of Poker Flat.
At 1300 UT the aurora drifted towards lower latitudes with the equatorward edge of the aurora extending to latitudes near Gakona.
The phase scintillation data from the Gakona site also show increased scintillation during this period characterized by the auroral equatorward transition.19
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
20
ASI movies
Phase scintillations observed on November 14, 2012 from Poker Flat superimposed on PFRR ASI movie.
Nighttime phase scintillation enhancement is localized and occurs across the auroral arc, confirming previous observations in the Canadian sector by Prikryl et al. [2011].
21
What is the local time variation of phase scintillation at high latitudes?
MLT variation of phase scintillation at Kaktovik for different levels of scintillation strength.
Occurrence Statistics
Red: weak
Diurnal variation
Blue: moderate
Pre-midnight maximum
Black: strong
Pre-midnight maximum
Occurrence Statistics
FYU PFRR
GAK
The weak scintillation events show a diurnal variation at all sites with a well-defined minimum near 0000 MLT.
Strongest scintillation events tend to be night time phenomena
Conclusions● Four CASES SM-211 GPS receivers deployed in Alaska● Demonstrates our ability to map scintillation in real-time, and to
provide space weather services to GPS users. ● Multi-instrument analysis was performed to understand the role
of energetic electron precipitation on high-latitude scintillations.● There are two main findings of the present study:
1. The severity of phase scintillation decreases with decreasing latitude, and
2. The largest phase scintillations occur near magnetic midnight.● We hypothesize that energetic particle precipitation on the night-
side might be responsible for the irregularities associated with these phase scintillation events.
● Weak scintillations, which show a clear diurnal behavior, possibly generated by cusp precipitations.
● Future studies will investigate this hypothesis with additional radar data on ionospheric irregularities and particle precipitation.
● Data are for sale, under a data-buy agreement● ASTRA is hiring GPS engineers
Summary and Conclusions