Investigation of the Fe+Ti+REE+Zr+P mineralization in the ...Samples for bulk rock will be crushed...
Transcript of Investigation of the Fe+Ti+REE+Zr+P mineralization in the ...Samples for bulk rock will be crushed...
1
Investigation of the Fe+Ti+REE+Zr+P mineralization in the Raftsund Batholith, Lofoten,
Norway
Donald Maute III
Master of Science Thesis Proposal
Introduction
Iron-titanium-phosphorus rich rocks are found in a variety of localities worldwide. Many
models, based on experimental work, suggest their origins are due to liquid immiscibility
between Si-rich and Fe-rich melts (Philpotts 1967). Others contest the existence of such Fe-rich
immiscible melts due to the unreasonably high temperatures (≥1300oC) required for unmixing to
occur (Lindsley and Epler, 2017. Other models for the genesis of these enriched zones include
hydrothermal fluid enrichment or extreme fractionation and crystal sorting. These types of
enrichment are interesting not only due to their enigmatic petrogenesis, but because they
commonly host economically viable abundances of rare earth elements (REEs), and high-field
strength elements (HFSE) (Tornos et al., 2016; Petrella et al., 2014)
In the Raftsund Batholith, Lofoten, Norway (Figure 1), a number of zones of Fe-Ti-REE-
Zr-P-mineralization have been documented (Ihlen et al., 2014). The mineral assemblage of the
zones consists largely of magnetite + ilmenite + zircon + apatite ± clinopyroxene ±
orthopyroxene ± olivine ± allanite, with secondary biotite and hornblende. A number of these
zones occur as vein-like structures distributed along the south to southeast margin of the island
of Årsteinen. Field observations show the mineralization is located at contacts between texturally
distinct porphyritic monzonite and coarse-grained, equigranular monzonite. These mineralized
zones differ from other nelsonite-like mineralization world-wide due to the presence of
abundant, and large (up to 3 mm) zircon. Classically, nelsonites are characterized by a 2:1 ratio
of magnetite and apatite (Philpotts 1967). The occurrence of the mineral assemblage at the
boundary between porphyritic and coarse-grained monzonitic units introduces the possibility that
a mixing reaction between the two magmas, or between fluids exsolved from the two magmas
may have promoted mineralization.
This research will implement a geochemical, oxygen isotope and textural study of
minerals present in the Årsteinen mineralized zones to distinguish between models of liquid
2
immiscibility, hydrothermal fluid enrichment, mineral accumulation or a more complex,
combined origin for the mineralized zones.
Figure 1. A) Map of Norway outlining the location of the Lofoten-Vesterålen
archipelago (Markl 2001). B) Geologic Map of the Lofoten-Vesterålen archipelago,
outlining the Raftsund pluton (Corfu et al., 2004).
Geologic Background
Lofoten-Vesterålen Mangerite Complex (LVMC)
The Lofoten-Vesterålen archipelago is dominated by mangerites, charnockites,
anorthosites, gabbros and granites intruding high-grade Precambrian rocks (Corfu et al., 2004).
3
The Lofoten-Vesterålen islands are thought to represent a window into the basement rock
beneath allochthonous Caledonian nappes, which crop out to the east (Corfu et al., 2004). The
intrusive suite on Lofoten-Vesterålen have been described as an anorthosite-charnockite-
mangerite-granite (AMCG) suite. Such intrusive suites are nearly exclusive to the Proterozoic
(Corfu et al., 2004; Bédard, 2009). The widely supported model for the emplacement of
anorthosites in AMCG suites is one of polybaric crystallization – with initial crystallization at
depth in the lower crust (corresponding pressures ~900 MPa), and emplacement at shallower
mid-crustal levels as a crystal-rich mush (~400 MPa) (Markl et al., 1998). The associated
gabbroic to charnokitic rocks on Lofoten-Vesterålen are thought to be related to each other by
crystal fractionation along an Fe-enrichment trend – which intruded at mid-crustal levels like that
of anorthosite emplacement (Markl et al., 1998).
Corfu et al. (2004) proposed a 3-stage model for the Lofoten-Vesterålen AMCG suite that
was initiated with emplacement of the Lodingen and Hopen plutons (1.87-1.86 Ga), which
corresponds with regional contraction and amalgamation of arcs. The dominant and most
voluminous stage of magmatic activity took place between 1.80 and 1.79 Ga and includes the
Raftsund pluton (Corfu et al., 2004). This stage of magmatism encompasses a wide range of rock
types of both crustal and mantle origin. These rocks are proposed to be related by a first-order
process, such as changing plate kinematics at the margin of the Baltic craton (Corfu, et al., 2004)
that may have initiated a large-scale melting event. Between 1.79 and 1.77 Ga magmatic activity
concluded with emplacement of late-stage pegmatites, and includes local hydration and
retrogression (Corfu et al., 2004).
The Raftsund Pluton
The Raftsund pluton, or, due to size, the Raftsund batholith, is centered around
Raftsundet strait and is dated at 1.80-1.79 Ga (U-Pb zircon; Corfu et al., 2004). At 1000 km2, this
intrusion is the largest monzonitic body on the Lofoten-Vesterålen archipelago (Griffin et al.,
1974). On the island of Årsteinen, the Raftsund Batholith is largely composed of two lithologies
with similar compositions, but different macroscopic and microscopic textures: coarse-grained,
equigranular monzonite and a porphyritic monzonite that locally lacks phenocrysts (Figures 2A
and 2B). The mineral assemblage consists of ternary feldspar + clinopyroxene + orthopyroxene +
4
hornblende + magnetite + ilmenite + zircon + apatite ± olivine ± pigeonite. The Raftsund
batholith has been previously referred to as a mangerite (Markl et al., 1998; Corfu et al., 2004)
but, will be further referred to as a opx-cpx-fay-monzonite. This allows for a simple, well-
recognized IUGS classification with appropriate prefixes, following Frost and Frost (2008).
Figure 2. A) A contact between the two contrasting textural types of the Raftsund
Batholith, with the porphyritic monzonite and coarse-grained monzonite. Pen is shown
5
for scale. Photo courtesy of C.G. Barnes. B) Photograph of a mineralized zone occurring
at the contact between the coarse-grained monzonite and the porphyritic monzonite. Pen
is shown for scale. Photo courtesy of C.G. Barnes.
Fe+Ti+REE+Zr+P mineralization
In the Raftsund Batholith on the south-southeast margin of Årsteinen are zones of Fe-Ti-
REE-Zr-P mineralization. These zones are small vein-like structures that are largely concentrated
at the contacts between the texturally distinct monzonitic units (Figure 2B). The (mineral)
assemblage of the mineralized zones consists of magnetite + ilmenite + olivine + zircon + apatite
± clinopyroxene ± orthopyroxene ± hornblende ± biotite ± allanite (Figures 3A and 3B). The
abundance of zircon greatly exceeds that of apatite, which is not typical for Fe-Ti-P
mineralization world-wide.
6
Figure 3. A) Plane-polarize photomicrograph displaying an isolated mineralized zone
near the contact of the two monzonite units consisting of Fe-Ti-oxides, zircon, apatite,
and allanite. Also shown is minor secondary biotite and garnet-orthopyroxene coronas
7
around the oxides (determined by Markl, 1998). B) Plane-polarized photomicrograph
displaying common mineral assemblage in the mineralized zone – Fe-Ti-oxides, olivine,
zircon, apatite, clinopyroxene and orthopyroxene.
Proposed Research
The primary aim of this study is to construct a model for the genesis of the Fe-Ti-REE-
Zr-P mineralization in the Raftsund batholith and to provide broader insight into the generation
of Fe-Ti-P ore-forming systems world-wide – which commonly concentrate strategic metals.
Existing models for similar systems are broadly based on one of three mechanisms: liquid
immiscibility (Velasco et al., 2016; He et al., 2016; Chai et al., 2014), hydrothermal enrichment
(Nabatian et al., 2014; Dupuis and Beudoin 2011; Haynes et al., 1995, or crystal accumulation
(She et al., 2015; Charlier et al., 2009; Tollari et al, 2008). The field relationships of the
mineralized zones to their host rocks being concentrated at the lithologic boundary between two
monzonitic units along with preliminary microscopic textures suggest that the Raftsund localities
may be appropriate locations to test liquid immiscibility models in natural systems. Although
liquid immiscibility is commonly cited as a mechanism for Fe-Ti-P mineralization it is also
commonly refuted (Lindsley and Epler, 2017). The occurrence of the mineralization at contacts
between the two texturally contrasting monzonites enables comparison of geochemical, isotopic
and textural features between host rocks and the mineralized zones – which may provide genetic
information to their origins.
The research will consist of 6 components
• Field work
• Petrography – Polarized and reflected light
• Textural analysis – Back Scattered Electron (BSE) and Cathodoluminescence
(CL) imaging
• Major and trace element mineral compositions – Electron Probe Micro Analysis
(EPMA), Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) and Laser Ablation-Inductively
Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS)
8
• Oxygen isotope mineral compositions – Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry
(SIMS)
• Bulk rock geochemistry – X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) and Laser Ablation-
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry
Methods
Sample Collection and Preparation
Samples of the mineralized zones and their host rocks will be collected on the island of
Årsteinen, Lofoten, Norway. Both types of monzonite will be sampled near the enriched zones,
and away from the zones where there was no visible evidence for mineralization. Samples of the
Raftsund monzonite will also be provided by Dr. Nolwenn Coint of the Norwegian Geological
Survey. Samples will be cut into billets and prepared for traditional covered and uncovered
polished thin sections.
Samples for bulk rock will be crushed and powdered by jaw crusher and a shatter box
with a ceramic sample container. Once powdered, the samples were tested for loss on ignition
(LOI) by placing a measured amount of powdered sample into preheated crucibles. The crucibles
were held at 1000°C in an oven for thirty minutes. After cooling in a desiccator, the samples
were weighed to determine the amount of volatiles lost. The LOI powder was fused to create
glass disc by mixing 2.000g ± 0.0010g of LOI powder with 4.0000g ± 0.0020g of a 49.75% Li-
metaborate, 49.75% Li-tetraborate, and 0.5% LiBr fluxing agent. The mixture was placed in a
platinum crucible along with 40 µl of LiI wetting agent, followed by fusing in a Claisse M4
fluxer.
Samples of bulk rock will also be crushed by a jaw crusher for use in mineral separation.
Repeated crushing by an iron mortar and pestle and subsequent sieving will be utilized to
separate zircon and magnetite grains. Heavy liquids and/or magnetic separation will be used if
necessary to further purify the mineral separates.
Petrography
9
Optical Petrography
Optical petrography with a polarizing light microscope operating in transmitted and
reflected modes will be conducted to characterize mineral assemblages, inter-mineral
relationships and textures in the mineralized zones and their host rocks.
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
Mineral zoning and inter-mineral textures will be characterized using BSE and CL
imaging using the Hitachi S-4300 SEM at Texas Tech University. Energy Dispersive
Spectrometry (EDS)-assisted phase identification will complement imaging techniques.
Electron Probe Microanalysis (EPMA)
The JEOL JXA-8200 Superprobe Electron-Probe Micro-Analyzer (EPMA) at Rutgers
University, NJ will be used to characterize the major element compositions of apatite, magnetite
and ilmenite. In addition, the EPMA will be used to collected element distribution maps of
mineral growth and mineral reaction textures identified by optical and SEM petrography.
Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS)
Trace element compositions of zircon, apatite, magnetite, ilmenite and bulk rock samples
will be collected using LA-ICP-MS in-situ analysis on polished thin sections and polished fused
glass disks using an Agilent 7500CS ICP-MS equipped with a NewWave 213 nm solid-state
laser at Texas Tech University. Trace element data will be reduced using an Excel spreadsheet.
Data for minerals will be reduced with either a measured concentration of SiO2 (zircon), CaO
(apatite) or Fe (magnetite and ilmenite) from the preceding EPMA analysis. Data for bulk rock
samples will be reduced with SiO2 content from preceding XRF analysis.
The data for mineral compositions will be standardized using either the USGS GSD,
USGS GSE, NIST 610 or NIST 612 standards. Repeated analysis of USGS BHVO-2G basaltic
10
glass will be utilized to measure precision and accuracy throughout the analytical runs. Durango
apatite will also be added for quality control for apatite.
Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS)
Major element geochemistry of silicate minerals with a focus on pyroxene and olivine
will be characterized using Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy via the Hitachi S-4300 SEM at
Texas Tech University.
Secondary-Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS)
Oxygen isotope ratios of zircon and magnetite will be collected using the Cameca IMS
1280 ion microprobe at the NORDSIM laboratory, Swedish Museum of Natural History,
Stockholm, Sweden. Minerals will be analyzed from the mineralization, the host monzonites, and
magnetite-rich country rock. A 20 kV Cs+ primary beam will be utilized – 10 kV primary, 10 kV
secondary, 1.5 nA and critically focused mode to sputter a 10 micron rastered spot (Pidgeon et
al., 2017).
X-Ray Fluouresence (XRF)
Major element geochemistry of bulk rock samples will be analyzed by XRF at Texas
Tech University using a Thermo Scientific ARL Perform ‘X’ instrument. Elements (ppm) and
oxides (wt%) collected include Al2O3, Ba, CaO, Cr, Cu, Fe2O3(TOT), K2O, MgO, MnO,
Na2O, Ni, P2O5, SiO2, Sr, TiO2, V, Zn, and Zr. Elements were analyzed at 60 kV and 60 mA
except for Al2O3, MgO, Na2O, P2O5, and SiO2 which was analyzed at 30 kV and 120 mA.
Using Data to Address Research Goals
This research will use textural evidence, element, and isotope geochemistry to create a
model for the generation of the Fe-Ti-REE-Zr-P mineralization – by discriminating between
liquid immiscibility, hydrothermal enrichment, or extreme mineral accumulation and crystal
11
sorting. The trace element geochemical data will be presented as spidergrams (REE, multi-
element variation diagrams) against chondrite. Major and minor element compositions will be
plotted on binary diagrams (element-element, element-ratio, or ratio-ratio) when necessary to
display correlations in the data or for use in discrimination diagrams for suggested mineral
petrogenesis. Additionally, major and minor element compositions will be presented as chemical
maps to display growth and reaction features. Textural observations will be presented as
photomicrographs, BSE, or CL images as applicable. Oxygen isotopic data will be presented and
normalized to Standard Mean Ocean Water (SMOW), and compared to previous experimental
work (Kyser et al., 1998) and compositions from natural Fe-Ti-P ore-systems. (Westhues et al.,
2017; Tornos et al., 2016; Jonsson et al., 2013; Nyström et al., 2008).
Hydrothermal enrichment is one proposed model for the generation of certain Fe-Ti-P ore
systems and is explained by episodic alteration by magmatic-hydrothermal and/or hydrothermal
fluids rich in Fe and alkalis, commonly accompanied by an alkalic alteration zone in the
surrounding rocks (Westhues et al., 2017). Minerals should preserve evidence of compositional
zoning documenting to the evolution of the mineralizing fluid. Back-scattered electron and CL
images of zircon will be used to distinguish between different domains of zircon and apatite
growth, providing insight into the history of the system. Complex internal textures of zircon in
BSE and CL are known to be representative of hydrothermal zircon – in comparison to magmatic
zircon, which preserves well-developed zoning and euhedral morphologies (Westhues et al.,
2017). Additionally, if zircon textures appear to be “spongy”, due to widespread mineral or fluid
inclusions then this may be suggestive of a hydrothermal origin (Westhues et al., 2017).
Magnetite compositions can also be used to discriminate hydrothermal versus magmatic
origins, through the use of compositional maps and trace element geochemistry (Broughm et al.,
2017). Abundances of Mg, Al, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Zn, Ga and Sn in magnetite have been
used to discriminate the petrogenesis of magnetite between different rock types, mineral deposit
types, and in some instances has been used as a relative proxy for temperature (Nadoll et al.
2014). For example, high Ga concentrations (~100 ppm) in magnetite has been suggested
correlate to high-temperature crystallization (Nadoll et al., 2014). Additionally, in silicate
magmas, the Ni/Cr ratios in magnetite are coupled, and are commonly <1 (Dare, et al., 2014). In
hydrothermal systems, Ni/Cr ratios are decoupled and are usually >1, as Ni is generally more
12
soluble in fluids (Dare, et al., 2014). Furthermore, if magnetite is observed to have elevated
incompatible element concentrations such as Si and Ca (Dare et al., 2014), then this would
support the hydrothermal enrichment model.
The second major mechanism suggested to generate Fe-Ti-oxide mineralization is liquid-
liquid immiscibility between an Fe-rich and a Si-rich melt. Some have suggested that this
process can occur due to the influence of magma mixing, crystal fractionation, or crustal
contamination (Wilson, 1989, Zhou, et al., 2005). Some of the strongest geologic evidence for
liquid immiscibility is the presence of Fe-rich melt inclusions trapped in minerals contained in
host rocks (Velasco et al., 2016; Jakobsen et al., 2011). If Fe-rich melt inclusions are found
hosted in minerals in the mineralization, or adjacent host rocks, this would be one piece of
evidence supporting the liquid immiscibility model.
In comparison to the Si-rich melt, the conjugate Fe-rich melts have elevated REEs,
HFSEs, P, Ti, high FeO and high CaO/Al2O3 ratios (Veskler et al., 2006). Therefore,
geochemical evidence should be preserved in the minerals that crystallized from an Fe-rich
immiscible liquid. The target minerals (i.e. zircon, apatite, magnetite and ilmenite) are present in
both the mineralized zones and the monzonitic host rocks. Analyzing minerals from the
mineralized zones and their host rocks allow comparisons between mineral compositions to look
for geochemical evidence suggestive of the presence of an Fe-rich melt. If REEs are significantly
enriched in the immiscible Fe-rich melt (Ellison and Hess 1989; Veksler et al., 2006), early
forming phases, such as apatite, should be relatively enriched in their REE content in comparison
to apatite from the host monzonite.
Niobium and tantalum have high affinity for ilmenite, and concentrations are correlated
with abundances in the melt and co-crystallization of other phases (She et al., 2015). The other
phase with strong affinity for these elements that may preferentially partition these elements is
zircon (Nardi et al., 2013). If zircon is not present, and not affecting Nb and Ta concentrations in
ilmenite, and if the ilmenite has elevated Nb and Ta compared to ilmenite in the monzonite, then
this may be evidence for liquid immiscibility (Veksler et al., 2006). In addition, non-chondritic
Ta/Nb values for the Fe-rich liquid have been suggested to be an indicator of liquid immiscibility
(Vicenzi et al., 1994; Veksler et al., 2006).
13
Fractionation of oxygen isotopes between an Fe-rich and Si-rich melts may also be used
as evidence for the presence of an Fe-rich immiscible liquid. If δ18O values of magnetite and
zircon between the mineralized zones and the host monzonite are within ~0.6‰, then this may
suggest liquid immiscibility as a responsible process (Kyser et al., 1998). During liquid
immiscibility, 18O has been experimentally determined to slightly fractionate into the Si-rich
melt, compared to the Fe-rich melt (<1‰) (Kyser et al., 1998).
The last of the three suggested processes for generating Fe-Ti-oxide mineralization is a
cumulate origin by gravitational settling and/or crystal sorting. Chromium, vanadium and nickel
are known to be generally compatible with magnetite and ilmenite (Chen et al., 2012). The
concentrations in these minerals correlate with concentrations in the melt, co-precipitating
phases, and mineral/melt partition coefficients (Dare et al., 2014; Nadoll et al., 2014; Charlier et
al., 2007). If the minerals in the mineralized zones have similar or, elevated concentrations of
Cr, V and Ni, in comparison to the host monzonites, then this may be suggestive of early
crystallization and subsequent accumulation. Textural analysis will also be a critical to
identifying cumulate textures by identifying signs of trapped interstitial liquids and documenting
mineral paragenesis. If ore minerals fractionated and accumulated into mineralized zones, then a
correlation between δO18 values of magnetite and zircon in the mineralized zones and the host
rocks should be preserved. On the contrary, if ore-minerals crystallized from a trapped interstitial
liquid, O isotopes of these minerals may have signatures of a more evolved melt.
Timeline
Summer 2017 – Field work and sampling in Lofoten, Norway.
Fall 2017 – Petrography and SEM, grant/fellowship writing.
Spring 2018 – LA-ICP-MS, SEM, preparation for EPMA.
Summer 2018 – EPMA at Rutgers University, NJ. Additional field work and sampling in
Lofoten.
14
Fall 2018 – Study abroad at Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).
Collaboration with Nolwenn Coint and Jacob Keiding at the Norwegian Geological Survey
(NGU). SIMS at NORDSIM laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden. Data synthesis.
Spring 2019 – Collection of more data at Texas Tech University if necessary. Thesis defense.
Funding
Funding for this research will be sourced from:
• GEMMS (GreEn Management of Mineral reSources)
o TBD
• Mineralogy, Geochemistry, Petrology, & Volcanology Division Graduate Student
Research Grant offered by the Geological Society of America
o $2,000
• Texas Tech University Geoscience Society
o $300
Intellectual Merit
This research will provide a better understanding into the mechanisms that concentrate
important strategic metals such as REEs and HFSEs to an economically viable abundance.
Additionally, this will allow for the improvement of models of Fe-Ti-P types of ore-forming
systems. This will enable more accurate prediction of how such mineralization is distributed in
the Earth’s crust, resulting in tactical and sustainable plans for mining operations. Being that the
genesis of these enrichments is not entirely agreed upon, this research will further assist
geoscientists to better understand their behavior.
Broader Impacts
Given the importance of REEs and Zr to the development of modern society, high-tech
advancements, and sustainable energy, this study will provide valuable information for the
15
exploration of new resources. This will also be of benefit to government-based mineral
exploration and independent mining companies world-wide by providing the foundation for
improved exploration techniques to be utilized in locating new resources. Additionally, through
the course of the student’s research, he will use a diversity of analytical equipment and acquire
skills to further his progression in his scientific career. The student plans to continue his
involvement with professional scientific organizations and furthermore, to present new,
innovative research on strategic mineral resources using skills and knowledge gained from his
education at Texas Tech University.
16
References
Bédard, J. H., et al., 2009. Parental magmas of Grenville Province massif-type anorthosites, and
conjectures about why massif anorthosites are restricted to the Proterozoic. Earth and
Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 100, 77-103.
Broughm, S. G., et al., 2017. Mineral chemistry of magnetite from magnetite-apatite
mineralization and their host rocks: examples from Kiruna, Sweden, and El Laco, Chile.
Mineralium Deposita, 52, 1223-1244.
Chai, F., et al., 2014. The Abagong apatite-rich magnetite deposit in the Chinese Altay Orogenic
Belt: A Kiruna-type iron deposit. Ore Geology Reviews, 57, 482-497.
Charlier, B., et al., 2007. Ilmenite composition in the Tellnes Fe–Ti deposit, SW Norway:
fractional crystallization, postcumulus evolution and ilmenite–zircon relation. Contributions to
Mineralogy and Petrology, 154, 119-134.
Chen, L., et al., 2017. Controls on trace-element partitioning among co-crystallizing minerals:
Evidence from the Panzhihua layered intrusion, SW China. American Mineralogist, 102, 1006-
1020.
Corfu, F., 2004. U–Pb Age, Setting and Tectonic Significance of the Anorthosite–Mangerite–
Charnockite– Granite Suite, Lofoten–Vesterålen, Norway. Journal of Petrology, 45(9), 1799-
1819.
Dare, S.A.S., et al., 2014. Trace elements in magnetite as petrogenetic indicators. Mineralium
Deposita, 49(7), 785-796.
Dupuis, C., and Beaudoin G., 2011. Discriminant diagrams for iron oxide trace element
fingerprinting of mineral deposit types. Mineralium Deposita, 46, 319-335.
Dynek, R. F., and Owens, B. E., 2001. Petrogenesis of Apatite-Rich Rocks (Nelsonites and
Oxide-Apatite Gabbronorites) Associated with Massif Anorthosites. Economic Geology, 96, 797-
815.
Ellison, A. J. G. and Hess. P. C., 1989. Solution properties of rare earth elements in silicate
melts: Inferences from immiscible liquids. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 53, 1965-1974.
17
Frost, B. R. and Frost, C. D., 2008. On Charnockites. Gondwana Research, 13, 30-44.
Griffin, W. L., et al., 1974. General geology, age and chemistry of the Raftsund Mangerite
Intrusion, Lofoten–Vesteralen. Norges Geologiske Undersøkelse, 312, 1–30.
Haynes, D. W., et al., 1995. Olympic Dam Ore Genesis: A Fluid-Mixing Model. Economic
Geology, 90, 281-307.
He, H., et al., 2016. Origin of nelsonite and Fe–Ti oxide ore of the Damiao anorthosite complex,
NE China: Evidence from trace element geochemistry of apatite, plagioclase, magnetite and
ilmenite. Ore Geology Reviews, 79, 367-381.
Ihlen, P.M., et al., 2014. Characterization of apatite resources in Norway and their REE potential
— A review. Ore Geology Reviews, 58, 128-147.
Jakobsen, J. K., et al., 2011. Crystallization of the Skaergaard Intrusion from an Emulsion of
Immiscible Iron- and Silica-rich Liquids: Evidence from Melt Inclusions in Plagioclase. Journal
of Petrology, 52(2), 345-373.
Jonsson, E., et al., 2003. Magmatic origin of giant 'Kiruna-type' apatite-iron-oxide ores in Central
Sweden. Scientific Reports (Nature), 3: 1644.
Kyser, T. K., 1998. The effects of liquid immiscibility and thermal diffusion on oxygen isotopes
in silicate liquids. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 133, 373-381.
Lindsley, D. H. and Epler, N., 2017. Do Fe-Ti-oxide magmas exist? Probably not! American
Mineralogist, 102, 2157-2169.
Markl, G., 2001. REE constrains on fractionation processes of massive-type anorthosites on the
Lofoten Islands, Norway. Mineralogy and Petrology, 72, 325-351.
Markl, G., et al., 1998. Diffusion-controlled olivine corona textures in granitic rocks from
Lofoten, Norway: calculation of Onsager diffusion coefficients, thermodynamic modelling and
petrological implications. Journal of Metamorphic Petrology, 16, 607-623.
Markl, G., et al., 1998. The Origin of Anorthosites and Related Rocks from the Lofoten Islands,
Northern Norway: I. Field Relations and Estimation of Intrinsic Variables. Journal of Petrology,
39(8), 1425-1452.
18
Nabatian, G., et al., 2014. Geology, alteration, age, and origin of iron oxide–apatite deposits in
Upper Eocene quartz monzonite, Zanjan district, NW Iran. Mineralium Deposita, 49, 217-234.
Nadoll, P., et al., 2014. The chemistry of hydrothermal magnetite: A review. Ore Geology
Reviews, 61, 1-32.
Nardi, L. V. S., et al., 2013. Zircon/rock partition coefficients of REEs, Y, Th, U, Nb, and Ta in
granitic rocks: Uses for provenance and mineral exploration purposes. Chemical Geology, 335,
1-7.
Nyström et al., 2008. Oxygen isotope composition of magnetite in iron ores of the Kiruna type in
Chile and Sweden. GFF, 130, 177-188.
Petrella, L., et al., 2014. The Nature and Origin of the Rare Earth Element Mineralization in the
Misery Syenitic Intrusion, Northern Quebec, Canada. Economic Geology, 109, 1643–1666.
Pidgeon, et al., 2017. The effect of weathering on U-Th-Pb and oxygen isotope systems of
ancient zircons from the Jack Hills, Western Australia. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 197,
142-166.
Philpotts, A. R., 1967. Origin of Certain Iron-Titanium Oxide and Apatite Rocks. Economic
Geology, 62, 303-315.
She Y., et al., 2015. Variations of trace element concentration of magnetite and ilmenite from the
Taihe layered intrusion, Emeishan large igneous province, SW China: Implications for magmatic
fractionation and origin of Fe–Ti–V oxide ore deposits. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 113,
1117-1131.
Tollari, N., et al., 2008. Trace element concentrations in apatites from the Sept-Îles Intrusive
Suite, Canada — Implications for the genesis of nelsonites. Chemical Geology, 252, 180-190.
Tornos, F, et al., 2016. Iron-rich melts, magmatic magnetite, and superheated hydrothermal
systems: The El Laco deposit, Chile. Geology, 44(6), 427-430.
Westhues, A., et al., 2017. Tracing the fluid evolution of the Kiruna iron oxide apatite deposits
using zircon, monazite, and whole rock trace elements and isotopic studies. Chemical Geology,
466, 303-322.
19
Velasco, F., et al., 2016. Immiscible iron- and silica-rich melts and magnetite geochemistry at the
El Laco volcano (northern Chile): Evidence for a magmatic origin for the magnetite deposits.
Ore Geology Reviews, 79, 346-366.
Veskler, I. V., 2006. Immiscible silicate liquid partition coefficients: implications for crystal-
melt element partitioning and basalt petrogenesis. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology,
152, 685-702.
Vicenzi, E., et al., 1994. Effect of oxygen fugacity on trace-element partitioning between
immiscible silicate melts at atmospheric pressure: A proton and electron microprobe study.
Chemical Geology, 117, 355-360.
Wilson., B., 1989. Igneous Petrogenesis a Global Tectonic Approach. Unwin Hyman, London.
Zhou., M. F., et al., 2005. Geochemistry, petrogenesis and metallogenesis of the Panzhihua
gabbroic layered intrusion and associated Fe-Ti-V oxide deposits, Sichuan Province, SW China.
Journal of Petrology, 46(11), 2253-2280.