Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20...

28
Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai , Japan Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering and Geosciences TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF CATALONIA (UPC)
  • date post

    20-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    215
  • download

    1

Transcript of Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20...

Page 1: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting

B. Garitte and A. Gens

2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20th of October 2008, Wakkanai , Japan

Dept. of Geotechnical Engineering and GeosciencesTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF CATALONIA (UPC)

Page 2: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Data from VE test (NF-PRO)

Page 3: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Schedule of Task A

Background of Task A

Description of step 0

Participants

Index

Page 4: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Schedule of Task A

Step 0: Identification of relevant processes and of Opalinus Clay parameters. Modelling of the

laboratory drying test.

Step 1: Hydromechanical modelling up to the end of Phase 1.

Step 2: Hydromechanical modelling up to the end of Phase 2 using parameters

backcalculated from step 1. Advanced features as permeability anisotropy, rock damage and

permeability increase in the damaged zone may be considered.

Step 3: Hydromechanical and geochemical modelling of the full test. Conservative transport

and one species considered.

Step 4: Hydromechanical and geochemical modelling of the full test. Reactive transport and

full geochemical model (optional).

Page 5: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Schedule of Task A

Step 0: Identification of relevant processes and of Opalinus Clay parameters. Modelling of the

laboratory drying test.

Step 1: Hydromechanical modelling up to the end of Phase 1.

Step 2: Hydromechanical modelling up to the end of Phase 2 using parameters

backcalculated from step 1. Advanced features as permeability anisotropy, rock damage and

permeability increase in the damaged zone may be considered.

Step 3: Hydromechanical and geochemical modelling of the full test. Conservative transport

and one species considered.

Step 4: Hydromechanical and geochemical modelling of the full test. Reactive transport and

full geochemical model (optional).

Page 6: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Schedule of Task A

Step 0: Identification of relevant processes and of Opalinus Clay parameters. Modelling of the

laboratory drying test.

Step 1: Hydromechanical modelling up to the end of Phase 1.

Step 2: Hydromechanical modelling up to the end of Phase 2 using parameters

backcalculated from step 1. Advanced features as permeability anisotropy, rock damage and

permeability increase in the damaged zone may be considered.

Step 3: Hydromechanical and geochemical modelling of the full test. Conservative transport

and one species considered.

Step 4: Hydromechanical and geochemical modelling of the full test. Reactive transport and

full geochemical model (optional).

Page 7: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Granite200m – 450 m deepGeneric, purpose-built

Opalinus (hard) clay400m deepGeneric, not purpose-built

C-O argillite (hard clay)450m – 520 m deep Site-specific

Boom clay (plastic)230m deepGeneric, purpose-built

Rock salt490m – 800m deepGeneric, not purpose-built

Granite450m deepGeneric, not purpose-built

Background of Task A

Page 8: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Mont Terri Project

• Located in Northern Switzerland

• Opalinus clay (shale)

• 400 m deep

• Operating since 1995

• Generic, not purpose - built

1: Mont Terri rock laboratory, 400 m beneath the hill2: Southern entrance of the motorway tunnelSource: Mont Terri website

Background of Task A

Page 9: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Background of Task A

Page 10: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

• Overconsolidated clay

• Low porosity (±15%)

• Water content (±6%)

• Density (2.45 g/cm3)

• Low permeability (±10-13m/s)

• Variation of stiffness (2 to 10 GPa)

• UCS (10 to 20 MPa)

• Anisotropic material Temperature Mechanical (Strength and

stiffness) Hydraulic (?: selfhealing)

Stiff layered Mesozoic clay of marine origin

Background of Task A

Page 11: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Background of Task A

Location of the ventilation test

Raise bored horizontal microtunnel

Page 12: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Background of Task A

Ventilation test section

Section SA3

In flow

RH-out

Water pan 1SA1

SB1 SC1SA2 SD1 SE

SC2 SB2SD2 SA4

SA3

Rear doors

Out flow

RH-outRH-in RH-1 RH-2

Water Pan 2

RH-in

Instru m ented section:SA : M in i P ie zo m e tersSB : H um id ity se ns orsSC : T D RsSD : Exten so m e te rsSE : G e oe le ctric

Forward doors

Le gend :

R H-n : hyg ro m e te rRH-rRH-l

10 m

7 m

1,50 m

1,00 m

0,65 m

0,65 m

0,60 m

0,60 m

0,60 m

0,60 m

1,00 m

0,65 m

0,65 m

1,50 m

MI niche1.3m

Page 13: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

11/03/1997

24/07/1998

06/12/1999

19/04/2001

01/09/2002

14/01/2004

28/05/2005

10/10/2006

22/02/2008

06/07/2009

18/11/2010

Time

Re

lati

ve h

um

idit

y o

f in

co

min

g a

ir

[%]

9/4

/98:

Exc

. NG

1/2

/99:

Exc

. MT

8/7

/02:

Sea

ling

ve

ntil

ate

d s

ect

ion

24/9/06

8/7/02

28/5/03 29/1/04 11/7/05

Background of Task A

Section SA3

In flow

RH-out

Water pan 1SA1

SB1 SC1SA2 SD1 SE

SC2 SB2SD2 SA4

SA3

Rear doors

Out flow

RH-outRH-in RH-1 RH-2

Water Pan 2

RH-in

Instru m ented section:SA : M in i P ie zo m e tersSB : H um id ity se ns orsSC : T D RsSD : Exten so m e te rsSE : G e oe le ctric

Forward doors

Le gend :

R H-n : hyg ro m e te rRH-rRH-l

10 m

7 m

1,50 m

1,00 m

0,65 m

0,65 m

0,60 m

0,60 m

0,60 m

0,60 m

1,00 m

0,65 m

0,65 m

1,50 m

Saturation 1: 11 months

Desaturation 1: 8 months

Saturation 2: 11.5 months

Desaturation 2: 20.5 months

Continuous water mass

balance

Water content profiles

Relative humidity

Water pressure

Displacements

Geochemical

characterization

Ventilation test

Page 14: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Objective of Task A

The main objective of the task is to examine the hydromechanical

and chemical changes that may occur in argillaceous host rocks,

especially in relation to the ventilation of drifts.

Page 15: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Description of step 0

Objectives:

Brainstorming about theoretical formulations to be used in Task A

Determination of a set of parameters for Opalinus Clay

Reproduction of a laboratory drying experiment (Floria et al, 2002)

Material provided:

Physical prop. All (project data), water content prof.

Hydraulic prop. Floria (2002), Muñoz (2003), Solexperts (2003)

Mechanical prop. Bock (2001)

Hydro-Mech. coupling Various

Hydro-Mechanical info from chemical reports.

Traber ( 2003, 2004), Fernandez (2007), Noy (2003)

Page 16: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Description of step 0

Drying test: lay out

Page 17: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Description of step 0

Impermeable lateral boundaries

10cm

28cm

Tem

per

atu

re 30ºC

Rel

ativ

e h

um

idit

y [%

]

20%

50%

142 days

Page 18: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Description of step 0

Impermeable lateral boundaries

10cm

28cm

Air

vel

oci

ty [

cm/s

]

30 [cm/s]

70 [cm/s]

9000gr.

Mas

s [g

ram

s]

Water pan: = 9.2cm

Page 19: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Description of step 0

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0 2 4 6 8water content [%]

dis

tan

ce t

o b

ase

[m]

Initial water content

Measurements at 21 days

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.20

0 50 100 150Time [days]

Wat

er l

oss

[kg

]

Sample C

Water content profiles

Water lost during drying

Initial water content (porosity = 16%), = 7%. Amount to 352gr. water

59gr. water

60gr. water

Page 20: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.20

0 50 100 150Time [days]

Wat

er l

oss

[kg

]

Sample B Sample C

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0 2 4 6 8water content [%]

dis

tan

ce t

o b

ase

[m]

Initial water content

Measurements at 21 days

Measurements at 99 days

Description of step 0

Water content profiles

Water lost during drying

Initial water content (porosity = 16%), = 7%. Amount to 352gr. water

121gr. water

130gr. water

Page 21: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.20

0 50 100 150Time [days]

Wat

er l

oss

[kg

]

Sample A Sample B Sample C

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0 2 4 6 8water content [%]

dis

tan

ce t

o b

ase

[m]

Initial water content

Measurements at 21 days

Measurements at 99 days

Measurements at 142 days

Description of step 0

Water content profiles

Water lost during drying

Initial water content (porosity = 16%), = 7%. Amount to 352gr. water

Page 22: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

0.00

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.10

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0.20

0 50 100 150Time [days]

Wat

er l

oss

[kg

]

Sample A Sample B Sample C

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0 2 4 6 8water content [%]

dis

tan

ce t

o b

ase

[m]

Initial water content

Measurements at 21 days

Measurements at 99 days

Measurements at 142 days

Description of step 0

Water content profiles

Water lost during drying

Initial water content (porosity = 16%), = 7%. Amount to 352gr. water

151gr. water

156gr. water

Page 23: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Participants

Modelling team CAS CEA JAEA Quintessa UoE

Person Liu Xiaoyan/Jing Lanru Alain Millard Shigeo Nakama Alex Bond Chris McDermott

On behalf of WHU IRSN JAEA NDA NDA

Country China France Japan UK UK

Comparison issues between different teams:

(T)H(M) formulation

Parameter set for Opalinus Clay

Model setup (top boundary condition)

Model results

Page 24: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Participants

CAS CEA JAEA Quintessa UoE

Physical

Solid grain density ρs [kg/m3]

Porosity φ

Hydraulic

Intrinsic permeability k [m2]

Dynamic viscosity μ [Pa.s]

Liquid relative permeability λ’

Vapour diffusion coefficient

Mechanical

Young modulus E [GPa]

Poisson coefficient ν

Friction angle φ [º]

Cohesion c [MPa]

Hydro-Mech. coupling

Suction bulk modulus Ks [GPa]

Air entry value (retention curve) P0 [MPa]

Shape parameter (retention curve) λ

Maximum suction (retention curve)* Ps [MPa]

Second shape parameter (retention curve)* λs

Residual and maximum saturation (retention curve) Srl – Srs

2 /wgD m s

* Modified Van Genuchten

Page 25: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Participants

CAS CEA JAEA Quintessa UoE

Physical

Solid grain density ρs [kg/m3]

Porosity φ

Hydraulic

Intrinsic permeability k [m2]

Dynamic viscosity μ [Pa.s]

Liquid relative permeability λ’

Vapour diffusion coefficient

Mechanical

Young modulus E [GPa]

Poisson coefficient ν

Friction angle φ [º]

Cohesion c [MPa]

Hydro-Mech. coupling

Suction bulk modulus Ks [GPa]

Air entry value (retention curve) P0 [MPa]

Shape parameter (retention curve) λ

Maximum suction (retention curve)* Ps [MPa]

Second shape parameter (retention curve)* λs

Residual and maximum saturation (retention curve) Srl – Srs

2 /wgD m s

* Modified Van Genuchten

Page 26: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Participants

CAS CEA JAEA Quintessa UoE

Physical

Solid grain density ρs [kg/m3]

Porosity φ

Hydraulic

Intrinsic permeability k [m2]

Dynamic viscosity μ [Pa.s]

Liquid relative permeability λ’

Vapour diffusion coefficient

Mechanical

Young modulus E [GPa]

Poisson coefficient ν

Friction angle φ [º]

Cohesion c [MPa]

Hydro-Mech. coupling

Suction bulk modulus Ks [GPa]

Air entry value (retention curve) P0 [MPa]

Shape parameter (retention curve) λ

Maximum suction (retention curve)* Ps [MPa]

Second shape parameter (retention curve)* λs

Residual and maximum saturation (retention curve) Srl – Srs

2 /wgD m s

* Modified Van Genuchten

Page 27: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Participants

CAS CEA JAEA Quintessa UoE

Physical

Solid grain density ρs [kg/m3]

Porosity φ

Hydraulic

Intrinsic permeability k [m2]

Dynamic viscosity μ [Pa.s]

Liquid relative permeability λ’

Vapour diffusion coefficient

Mechanical

Young modulus E [GPa]

Poisson coefficient ν

Friction angle φ [º]

Cohesion c [MPa]

Hydro-Mech. coupling

Suction bulk modulus Ks [GPa]

Air entry value (retention curve) P0 [MPa]

Shape parameter (retention curve) λ

Maximum suction (retention curve)* Ps [MPa]

Second shape parameter (retention curve)* λs

Residual and maximum saturation (retention curve) Srl – Srs

2 /wgD m s

* Modified Van Genuchten

Page 28: Introduction to the Task A Task Force Meeting B. Garitte and A. Gens 2nd DECOVALEX 2011 workshop, 20 th of October 2008, Wakkanai, Japan Dept. of Geotechnical.

Participants

CAS CEA JAEA Quintessa UoE

Physical

Solid grain density ρs [kg/m3]

Porosity φ

Hydraulic

Intrinsic permeability k [m2]

Dynamic viscosity μ [Pa.s]

Liquid relative permeability λ’

Vapour diffusion coefficient

Mechanical

Young modulus E [GPa]

Poisson coefficient ν

Friction angle φ [º]

Cohesion c [MPa]

Hydro-Mech. coupling

Suction bulk modulus Ks [GPa]

Air entry value (retention curve) P0 [MPa]

Shape parameter (retention curve) λ

Maximum suction (retention curve)* Ps [MPa]

Second shape parameter (retention curve)* λs

Residual and maximum saturation (retention curve) Srl – Srs

2 /wgD m s

* Modified Van Genuchten

0.1

1

10

100

1000

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1Degree of saturation

Pg

-Pl [

MP

a]

Drying Path (Muñoz, 2003)

Wetting Path (Muñoz, 2003)

Gens (2000)

Drying path (Zhang, 2005)

Wetting path (Zhang, 2005)

Drying path (Villar, 2007)