Intro to ME final design project

20
CONVERTIBLE BIKE CHALLENGE TAYLOR AMAREL & KAITLIN THOMAS

description

The purpose of this experiment is to research and design an innovative bike that serves a dual purpose of a reclining chair and an off road bike. This invention is designed to provide users the ability to work or relax off the beaten track for an entire day while minimizing the amount of supplies needed. Our design was influenced by the research done with regards to cost of production, ease of use, safety, and bicycle functionality. These considerations were made priorities so that the final product would be the most cost effective, quality product possible.

Transcript of Intro to ME final design project

Page 1: Intro to ME final design project

CONVERTIBLE BIKE CHALLENGE

TAYLOR AMAREL & KAITLIN THOMAS

Page 2: Intro to ME final design project

Problem

To comfortably work or relax off the beaten path for an entire day requires carrying bulky, heavy equipment and tools.

Page 3: Intro to ME final design project

Current Obstacles

Reaching remote locations Carrying heavy supplies Assembling cumbersome equipment Purchasing multiple products and

supplies

Page 4: Intro to ME final design project

Solution

Design a bike that satisfies the following parameters: Capable of off-road travel Converts into a hammock or recliner Minimizes excess equipment required Safe and easy to use Viable price point for the target market Provides the ability to work or relax

Page 5: Intro to ME final design project

Design Ideas

“Concept Frame Design” Features:

Collapsible concept frame Recliner style chair

Advantages: Great aesthetics Lowest risk of serious injury

Disadvantages: Expensive to manufacture Uncertain bike functionality

Page 6: Intro to ME final design project

Design Ideas

Figure 1a. Initial Concept Sketch of the Conceptual Frame Design in bike form

Figure 1b. Initial Concept Sketch of the Conceptual Frame Design in chair form

“Concept Frame Design”

Page 7: Intro to ME final design project

Design Ideas

“Suspended Seat Design” Features:

Inverted bike frame with telescoping members Hammock style seat

Advantages: Cheaper than the Concept Frame Design

Disadvantages: Complicated to manufacture Diminished bike functionality Unstable when in use

Page 8: Intro to ME final design project

Design Ideas

Figure 2a. Initial Concept Sketch of the Suspended Seat Design in bike form

Figure 2b. Initial Concept Sketch of the Suspended Seat Design in chair form

“Suspended Seat Design”

Page 9: Intro to ME final design project

Design Ideas

“Final Design” Features:

Inverted mountain bike frame with hinged member

Hammock style Advantages:

Inexpensive and unobtrusive modifications Streamlined conversion process Completely maintains bike functionality

Disadvantages: Requires custom parts

Page 10: Intro to ME final design project

Design Ideas

Figure 3a. Final sketch of the Final Design in hammock form

Figure 3b. Final sketch of the Final Design in hammock form with material

“Final Design”

Page 11: Intro to ME final design project

Selection Process

Criteria Concept Frame Design Suspended Seat Design

Final Design

Cost 1 8 7

Functionality 7 3 7

Aesthetics 6 4 10

Safety 8 4 9

Ease of Use 6 3 9

Special Requirements 8 7 8

Conversion Time 5 4 7

Table 1. A qualitative table of bike characteristic ratings with 10 being the best and 0 being the worst, these are estimates based on design and inherent advantages or disadvantages.

Page 12: Intro to ME final design project

Research Model Conversion Process

Figure 4. Position 1

Page 13: Intro to ME final design project

Research Model Conversion Process

Figure 5. Position 2

Page 14: Intro to ME final design project

Research Model Conversion Process

Figure 6. Position 3

Page 15: Intro to ME final design project

Research Model Conversion Process

Figure 7. Position 4

Page 16: Intro to ME final design project

Research Model Conversion Process

Figure 8. Position 5

Page 17: Intro to ME final design project

Research Model Conversion Process

Figure 9. Position 6

Page 18: Intro to ME final design project

Prototype Model

Figure 10. Photograph of the prototype for the Final Design in hammock form with material

Page 19: Intro to ME final design project

Conclusion

Overall the Final Design proved to be the most viable option for a variety of reasons. Prefabricated mountain bike frame reduces

cost Unmodified frame increases safety Multi-purpose components reduce cost Compact reconfiguration and storage No tools required

Page 20: Intro to ME final design project

References

Suciu, Peter. "Creating Bikes And Parts With A 3D Printer - BikeRadar." Bikes, Bike Reviews, Cycling Routes, Race News - BikeRadar. Bike Radar, 20 Aug. 2012. Web. 26 Nov. 2012. <http://www.bikeradar.com/news/article/creating-bikes-and-parts-with-a-3d-printer-34996/>.

Autodesk Inc.. "Autodesk - AutoCAD - Select a Service Provider to Print Your AutoCAD 3D Model." Autodesk - 3D Design & Engineering Software for Architecture, Manufacturing, and Entertainment. Autodesk Inc., 18 May 2011. Web. 26 Nov. 2012. <http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/pc/item?id=13779273&siteID=123112>.

"Labor Rates - Wheelworks Bicycle Stores and Cycling Centers." Wheelworks Bicycle Stores and Cycling Centers - The New England Bicycle Source. N.p., 13 Apr. 2011. Web. 26 Nov. 2012. <http://wheelworks.com/articles/labor-rates-pg132.htm>.

"Shimano Parts - Bicycles and gear for every type of riding - Diamondback, Fox, Giant, Raleigh, Felt, Santa Cruz & more." BicycleWarehouse.com - Largest Bicycle Retailer in San Diego - 8 Locations in San Diego and Riverside County. N.p., 14 Oct. 2008. Web. 26 Nov. 2012. <http://www.bicyclewarehouse.com/product-list/shimano-parts-pg286/>.

"Technology | Reliable and durable bike manufacturing." Rocky Mountain Bicycles | Mountain, road, urban & path bikes. N.p., 26 Aug. 2011. Web. 26 Nov. 2012. <http://www.bikes.com/main+en+02_100+technology.html>.