Introducing the iTILT projects on IWB & Tablets in Language Education
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms: the iTILT project in...
-
Upload
shona-whyte -
Category
Education
-
view
2.718 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms: the iTILT project in...
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
Shona WhyteUniversiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
introduction
INTERACTIVY amp INTERACTION
the iTILT project on interactive whiteboards (IWBs) for communicative language teaching
discussion of CALL that reaches beyond the hype and the latest gadget to encompass longer term priorities and goals
2
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
403
projector
touch sensitive screen
computer
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
background
IWB RESEARCH
increased motivation
faster pace
digital hub
4
easily integrated into any pedagogical approach (eg teacher-fronted)
need for ongoing teacher support
advantages drawbacks
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2012
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
5
Teacher development as IWB user (Beauchamp 2004)
Teacher development as IWB user (Beauchamp 2004)
Teacher development as IWB user (Beauchamp 2004)
beginner
apprentice
initiate
advanced
IWB as blackwhiteboard substitute only teacher uses IWB
only native software
planned learner manipulation of objects (drag and drop) some other software
planned learner use of more IWB tools
use of more programmes (internet)
spontaneous learner use of IWB features and peripherals (slates)
use of audio and video files
background
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
406
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
407
7 countries
6 languages
website with video examples of IWB-supported classroom
practice with additional materials
DutchEnglishFrenchSpanishTurkishWelsh
BelgiumFrance
GermanyNetherlands
SpainTurkey
UK
primarysecondaryuniversityvocational
4 sectors
44 teachers 81 films 267 clips
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
408Whyte Cutrim Schmid van Hazebrouck Thompson amp Oberhofer (in press)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
ITILT RESEARCH
9
teachers showed high self-efficacy perceptions for ICT lower confidence with IWB tools but encouraged learners to use the IWBHillier Beauchamp Whyte (2013)
primary teachers used narrow range of basic tools for circumscribed goals irrespective of IWB experience Whyte Beauchamp Hillier (2012)
teachers had differing views of IWB affordances for language teaching Whyte et al (in press)
background
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4011
TEACHER A
high ICT confidence amp IWB convictions
moderate IWB confidence
limited range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Because I worked before and now Im only
with the children Working with them not thinking what Im writing at the moment able to
concentrate on the pupils
Because there are some people visual and
auditive And I think that visual can help because they remember what is
written
Video example
Apprentice level 2
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
study
ITILT FRANCE
1 how did French teachers use the IWB over the course of the project
2 how can teachers IWB use be accounted for
3 what interactional opportunities were provided for learners
12
Research questions
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
method
FRENCH DATA
9 EFL teachers (primary middle secondary university)
56 classroom clips 16 teacher and learner interviews teacher questionnaire data focus group and online community
contributions
13
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4014
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
BACKGROUND DATAprimary
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4015
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
middle
secondary
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4016
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
university
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
analysis
QUALITATIVE amp QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES
coding of 56 class video clips- IWB tools amp features- user teacher vs learner- teaching objectives
analysis of ICT questionnaire + online community participation
development of IWB language teacher profiles
17
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4018
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
teacher profiles23
TEACHER H
low IWB confidence amp convictions
narrow range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
I have been able to use the board I am not very creative
with it and my only useful skills so far are flashing up
documents that I had already prepared on Open Office and the having the pupils
writehighlight on them to do what we would have been
doing with photocopies This saves paper and does make it more generally interactive It
also gets them inter-correcting much more
Video example
Beginner level 1
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4024
IWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachers
IWB tools and features
IWB user teacher or learner
Language teaching objectives
balance between embedding and activity clear preference
for learner use of IWB
balanced use of IWB for skills and subskills
limited range of tools and features used
clear preference for learner use of IWB much more speaking + listening
than reading + writing
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups
strong focus on vocabulary also pronunciation
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups rare use for grammar
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
introduction
INTERACTIVY amp INTERACTION
the iTILT project on interactive whiteboards (IWBs) for communicative language teaching
discussion of CALL that reaches beyond the hype and the latest gadget to encompass longer term priorities and goals
2
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
403
projector
touch sensitive screen
computer
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
background
IWB RESEARCH
increased motivation
faster pace
digital hub
4
easily integrated into any pedagogical approach (eg teacher-fronted)
need for ongoing teacher support
advantages drawbacks
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2012
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
5
Teacher development as IWB user (Beauchamp 2004)
Teacher development as IWB user (Beauchamp 2004)
Teacher development as IWB user (Beauchamp 2004)
beginner
apprentice
initiate
advanced
IWB as blackwhiteboard substitute only teacher uses IWB
only native software
planned learner manipulation of objects (drag and drop) some other software
planned learner use of more IWB tools
use of more programmes (internet)
spontaneous learner use of IWB features and peripherals (slates)
use of audio and video files
background
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
406
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
407
7 countries
6 languages
website with video examples of IWB-supported classroom
practice with additional materials
DutchEnglishFrenchSpanishTurkishWelsh
BelgiumFrance
GermanyNetherlands
SpainTurkey
UK
primarysecondaryuniversityvocational
4 sectors
44 teachers 81 films 267 clips
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
408Whyte Cutrim Schmid van Hazebrouck Thompson amp Oberhofer (in press)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
ITILT RESEARCH
9
teachers showed high self-efficacy perceptions for ICT lower confidence with IWB tools but encouraged learners to use the IWBHillier Beauchamp Whyte (2013)
primary teachers used narrow range of basic tools for circumscribed goals irrespective of IWB experience Whyte Beauchamp Hillier (2012)
teachers had differing views of IWB affordances for language teaching Whyte et al (in press)
background
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4011
TEACHER A
high ICT confidence amp IWB convictions
moderate IWB confidence
limited range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Because I worked before and now Im only
with the children Working with them not thinking what Im writing at the moment able to
concentrate on the pupils
Because there are some people visual and
auditive And I think that visual can help because they remember what is
written
Video example
Apprentice level 2
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
study
ITILT FRANCE
1 how did French teachers use the IWB over the course of the project
2 how can teachers IWB use be accounted for
3 what interactional opportunities were provided for learners
12
Research questions
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
method
FRENCH DATA
9 EFL teachers (primary middle secondary university)
56 classroom clips 16 teacher and learner interviews teacher questionnaire data focus group and online community
contributions
13
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4014
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
BACKGROUND DATAprimary
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4015
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
middle
secondary
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4016
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
university
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
analysis
QUALITATIVE amp QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES
coding of 56 class video clips- IWB tools amp features- user teacher vs learner- teaching objectives
analysis of ICT questionnaire + online community participation
development of IWB language teacher profiles
17
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4018
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
teacher profiles23
TEACHER H
low IWB confidence amp convictions
narrow range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
I have been able to use the board I am not very creative
with it and my only useful skills so far are flashing up
documents that I had already prepared on Open Office and the having the pupils
writehighlight on them to do what we would have been
doing with photocopies This saves paper and does make it more generally interactive It
also gets them inter-correcting much more
Video example
Beginner level 1
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4024
IWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachers
IWB tools and features
IWB user teacher or learner
Language teaching objectives
balance between embedding and activity clear preference
for learner use of IWB
balanced use of IWB for skills and subskills
limited range of tools and features used
clear preference for learner use of IWB much more speaking + listening
than reading + writing
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups
strong focus on vocabulary also pronunciation
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups rare use for grammar
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
403
projector
touch sensitive screen
computer
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
background
IWB RESEARCH
increased motivation
faster pace
digital hub
4
easily integrated into any pedagogical approach (eg teacher-fronted)
need for ongoing teacher support
advantages drawbacks
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2012
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
5
Teacher development as IWB user (Beauchamp 2004)
Teacher development as IWB user (Beauchamp 2004)
Teacher development as IWB user (Beauchamp 2004)
beginner
apprentice
initiate
advanced
IWB as blackwhiteboard substitute only teacher uses IWB
only native software
planned learner manipulation of objects (drag and drop) some other software
planned learner use of more IWB tools
use of more programmes (internet)
spontaneous learner use of IWB features and peripherals (slates)
use of audio and video files
background
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
406
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
407
7 countries
6 languages
website with video examples of IWB-supported classroom
practice with additional materials
DutchEnglishFrenchSpanishTurkishWelsh
BelgiumFrance
GermanyNetherlands
SpainTurkey
UK
primarysecondaryuniversityvocational
4 sectors
44 teachers 81 films 267 clips
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
408Whyte Cutrim Schmid van Hazebrouck Thompson amp Oberhofer (in press)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
ITILT RESEARCH
9
teachers showed high self-efficacy perceptions for ICT lower confidence with IWB tools but encouraged learners to use the IWBHillier Beauchamp Whyte (2013)
primary teachers used narrow range of basic tools for circumscribed goals irrespective of IWB experience Whyte Beauchamp Hillier (2012)
teachers had differing views of IWB affordances for language teaching Whyte et al (in press)
background
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4011
TEACHER A
high ICT confidence amp IWB convictions
moderate IWB confidence
limited range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Because I worked before and now Im only
with the children Working with them not thinking what Im writing at the moment able to
concentrate on the pupils
Because there are some people visual and
auditive And I think that visual can help because they remember what is
written
Video example
Apprentice level 2
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
study
ITILT FRANCE
1 how did French teachers use the IWB over the course of the project
2 how can teachers IWB use be accounted for
3 what interactional opportunities were provided for learners
12
Research questions
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
method
FRENCH DATA
9 EFL teachers (primary middle secondary university)
56 classroom clips 16 teacher and learner interviews teacher questionnaire data focus group and online community
contributions
13
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4014
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
BACKGROUND DATAprimary
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4015
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
middle
secondary
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4016
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
university
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
analysis
QUALITATIVE amp QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES
coding of 56 class video clips- IWB tools amp features- user teacher vs learner- teaching objectives
analysis of ICT questionnaire + online community participation
development of IWB language teacher profiles
17
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4018
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
teacher profiles23
TEACHER H
low IWB confidence amp convictions
narrow range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
I have been able to use the board I am not very creative
with it and my only useful skills so far are flashing up
documents that I had already prepared on Open Office and the having the pupils
writehighlight on them to do what we would have been
doing with photocopies This saves paper and does make it more generally interactive It
also gets them inter-correcting much more
Video example
Beginner level 1
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4024
IWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachers
IWB tools and features
IWB user teacher or learner
Language teaching objectives
balance between embedding and activity clear preference
for learner use of IWB
balanced use of IWB for skills and subskills
limited range of tools and features used
clear preference for learner use of IWB much more speaking + listening
than reading + writing
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups
strong focus on vocabulary also pronunciation
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups rare use for grammar
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
background
IWB RESEARCH
increased motivation
faster pace
digital hub
4
easily integrated into any pedagogical approach (eg teacher-fronted)
need for ongoing teacher support
advantages drawbacks
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2012
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
5
Teacher development as IWB user (Beauchamp 2004)
Teacher development as IWB user (Beauchamp 2004)
Teacher development as IWB user (Beauchamp 2004)
beginner
apprentice
initiate
advanced
IWB as blackwhiteboard substitute only teacher uses IWB
only native software
planned learner manipulation of objects (drag and drop) some other software
planned learner use of more IWB tools
use of more programmes (internet)
spontaneous learner use of IWB features and peripherals (slates)
use of audio and video files
background
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
406
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
407
7 countries
6 languages
website with video examples of IWB-supported classroom
practice with additional materials
DutchEnglishFrenchSpanishTurkishWelsh
BelgiumFrance
GermanyNetherlands
SpainTurkey
UK
primarysecondaryuniversityvocational
4 sectors
44 teachers 81 films 267 clips
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
408Whyte Cutrim Schmid van Hazebrouck Thompson amp Oberhofer (in press)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
ITILT RESEARCH
9
teachers showed high self-efficacy perceptions for ICT lower confidence with IWB tools but encouraged learners to use the IWBHillier Beauchamp Whyte (2013)
primary teachers used narrow range of basic tools for circumscribed goals irrespective of IWB experience Whyte Beauchamp Hillier (2012)
teachers had differing views of IWB affordances for language teaching Whyte et al (in press)
background
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4011
TEACHER A
high ICT confidence amp IWB convictions
moderate IWB confidence
limited range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Because I worked before and now Im only
with the children Working with them not thinking what Im writing at the moment able to
concentrate on the pupils
Because there are some people visual and
auditive And I think that visual can help because they remember what is
written
Video example
Apprentice level 2
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
study
ITILT FRANCE
1 how did French teachers use the IWB over the course of the project
2 how can teachers IWB use be accounted for
3 what interactional opportunities were provided for learners
12
Research questions
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
method
FRENCH DATA
9 EFL teachers (primary middle secondary university)
56 classroom clips 16 teacher and learner interviews teacher questionnaire data focus group and online community
contributions
13
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4014
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
BACKGROUND DATAprimary
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4015
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
middle
secondary
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4016
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
university
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
analysis
QUALITATIVE amp QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES
coding of 56 class video clips- IWB tools amp features- user teacher vs learner- teaching objectives
analysis of ICT questionnaire + online community participation
development of IWB language teacher profiles
17
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4018
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
teacher profiles23
TEACHER H
low IWB confidence amp convictions
narrow range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
I have been able to use the board I am not very creative
with it and my only useful skills so far are flashing up
documents that I had already prepared on Open Office and the having the pupils
writehighlight on them to do what we would have been
doing with photocopies This saves paper and does make it more generally interactive It
also gets them inter-correcting much more
Video example
Beginner level 1
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4024
IWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachers
IWB tools and features
IWB user teacher or learner
Language teaching objectives
balance between embedding and activity clear preference
for learner use of IWB
balanced use of IWB for skills and subskills
limited range of tools and features used
clear preference for learner use of IWB much more speaking + listening
than reading + writing
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups
strong focus on vocabulary also pronunciation
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups rare use for grammar
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
5
Teacher development as IWB user (Beauchamp 2004)
Teacher development as IWB user (Beauchamp 2004)
Teacher development as IWB user (Beauchamp 2004)
beginner
apprentice
initiate
advanced
IWB as blackwhiteboard substitute only teacher uses IWB
only native software
planned learner manipulation of objects (drag and drop) some other software
planned learner use of more IWB tools
use of more programmes (internet)
spontaneous learner use of IWB features and peripherals (slates)
use of audio and video files
background
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
406
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
407
7 countries
6 languages
website with video examples of IWB-supported classroom
practice with additional materials
DutchEnglishFrenchSpanishTurkishWelsh
BelgiumFrance
GermanyNetherlands
SpainTurkey
UK
primarysecondaryuniversityvocational
4 sectors
44 teachers 81 films 267 clips
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
408Whyte Cutrim Schmid van Hazebrouck Thompson amp Oberhofer (in press)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
ITILT RESEARCH
9
teachers showed high self-efficacy perceptions for ICT lower confidence with IWB tools but encouraged learners to use the IWBHillier Beauchamp Whyte (2013)
primary teachers used narrow range of basic tools for circumscribed goals irrespective of IWB experience Whyte Beauchamp Hillier (2012)
teachers had differing views of IWB affordances for language teaching Whyte et al (in press)
background
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4011
TEACHER A
high ICT confidence amp IWB convictions
moderate IWB confidence
limited range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Because I worked before and now Im only
with the children Working with them not thinking what Im writing at the moment able to
concentrate on the pupils
Because there are some people visual and
auditive And I think that visual can help because they remember what is
written
Video example
Apprentice level 2
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
study
ITILT FRANCE
1 how did French teachers use the IWB over the course of the project
2 how can teachers IWB use be accounted for
3 what interactional opportunities were provided for learners
12
Research questions
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
method
FRENCH DATA
9 EFL teachers (primary middle secondary university)
56 classroom clips 16 teacher and learner interviews teacher questionnaire data focus group and online community
contributions
13
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4014
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
BACKGROUND DATAprimary
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4015
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
middle
secondary
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4016
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
university
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
analysis
QUALITATIVE amp QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES
coding of 56 class video clips- IWB tools amp features- user teacher vs learner- teaching objectives
analysis of ICT questionnaire + online community participation
development of IWB language teacher profiles
17
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4018
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
teacher profiles23
TEACHER H
low IWB confidence amp convictions
narrow range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
I have been able to use the board I am not very creative
with it and my only useful skills so far are flashing up
documents that I had already prepared on Open Office and the having the pupils
writehighlight on them to do what we would have been
doing with photocopies This saves paper and does make it more generally interactive It
also gets them inter-correcting much more
Video example
Beginner level 1
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4024
IWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachers
IWB tools and features
IWB user teacher or learner
Language teaching objectives
balance between embedding and activity clear preference
for learner use of IWB
balanced use of IWB for skills and subskills
limited range of tools and features used
clear preference for learner use of IWB much more speaking + listening
than reading + writing
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups
strong focus on vocabulary also pronunciation
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups rare use for grammar
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
406
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
407
7 countries
6 languages
website with video examples of IWB-supported classroom
practice with additional materials
DutchEnglishFrenchSpanishTurkishWelsh
BelgiumFrance
GermanyNetherlands
SpainTurkey
UK
primarysecondaryuniversityvocational
4 sectors
44 teachers 81 films 267 clips
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
408Whyte Cutrim Schmid van Hazebrouck Thompson amp Oberhofer (in press)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
ITILT RESEARCH
9
teachers showed high self-efficacy perceptions for ICT lower confidence with IWB tools but encouraged learners to use the IWBHillier Beauchamp Whyte (2013)
primary teachers used narrow range of basic tools for circumscribed goals irrespective of IWB experience Whyte Beauchamp Hillier (2012)
teachers had differing views of IWB affordances for language teaching Whyte et al (in press)
background
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4011
TEACHER A
high ICT confidence amp IWB convictions
moderate IWB confidence
limited range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Because I worked before and now Im only
with the children Working with them not thinking what Im writing at the moment able to
concentrate on the pupils
Because there are some people visual and
auditive And I think that visual can help because they remember what is
written
Video example
Apprentice level 2
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
study
ITILT FRANCE
1 how did French teachers use the IWB over the course of the project
2 how can teachers IWB use be accounted for
3 what interactional opportunities were provided for learners
12
Research questions
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
method
FRENCH DATA
9 EFL teachers (primary middle secondary university)
56 classroom clips 16 teacher and learner interviews teacher questionnaire data focus group and online community
contributions
13
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4014
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
BACKGROUND DATAprimary
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4015
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
middle
secondary
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4016
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
university
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
analysis
QUALITATIVE amp QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES
coding of 56 class video clips- IWB tools amp features- user teacher vs learner- teaching objectives
analysis of ICT questionnaire + online community participation
development of IWB language teacher profiles
17
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4018
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
teacher profiles23
TEACHER H
low IWB confidence amp convictions
narrow range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
I have been able to use the board I am not very creative
with it and my only useful skills so far are flashing up
documents that I had already prepared on Open Office and the having the pupils
writehighlight on them to do what we would have been
doing with photocopies This saves paper and does make it more generally interactive It
also gets them inter-correcting much more
Video example
Beginner level 1
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4024
IWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachers
IWB tools and features
IWB user teacher or learner
Language teaching objectives
balance between embedding and activity clear preference
for learner use of IWB
balanced use of IWB for skills and subskills
limited range of tools and features used
clear preference for learner use of IWB much more speaking + listening
than reading + writing
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups
strong focus on vocabulary also pronunciation
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups rare use for grammar
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
407
7 countries
6 languages
website with video examples of IWB-supported classroom
practice with additional materials
DutchEnglishFrenchSpanishTurkishWelsh
BelgiumFrance
GermanyNetherlands
SpainTurkey
UK
primarysecondaryuniversityvocational
4 sectors
44 teachers 81 films 267 clips
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
408Whyte Cutrim Schmid van Hazebrouck Thompson amp Oberhofer (in press)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
ITILT RESEARCH
9
teachers showed high self-efficacy perceptions for ICT lower confidence with IWB tools but encouraged learners to use the IWBHillier Beauchamp Whyte (2013)
primary teachers used narrow range of basic tools for circumscribed goals irrespective of IWB experience Whyte Beauchamp Hillier (2012)
teachers had differing views of IWB affordances for language teaching Whyte et al (in press)
background
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4011
TEACHER A
high ICT confidence amp IWB convictions
moderate IWB confidence
limited range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Because I worked before and now Im only
with the children Working with them not thinking what Im writing at the moment able to
concentrate on the pupils
Because there are some people visual and
auditive And I think that visual can help because they remember what is
written
Video example
Apprentice level 2
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
study
ITILT FRANCE
1 how did French teachers use the IWB over the course of the project
2 how can teachers IWB use be accounted for
3 what interactional opportunities were provided for learners
12
Research questions
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
method
FRENCH DATA
9 EFL teachers (primary middle secondary university)
56 classroom clips 16 teacher and learner interviews teacher questionnaire data focus group and online community
contributions
13
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4014
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
BACKGROUND DATAprimary
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4015
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
middle
secondary
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4016
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
university
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
analysis
QUALITATIVE amp QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES
coding of 56 class video clips- IWB tools amp features- user teacher vs learner- teaching objectives
analysis of ICT questionnaire + online community participation
development of IWB language teacher profiles
17
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4018
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
teacher profiles23
TEACHER H
low IWB confidence amp convictions
narrow range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
I have been able to use the board I am not very creative
with it and my only useful skills so far are flashing up
documents that I had already prepared on Open Office and the having the pupils
writehighlight on them to do what we would have been
doing with photocopies This saves paper and does make it more generally interactive It
also gets them inter-correcting much more
Video example
Beginner level 1
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4024
IWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachers
IWB tools and features
IWB user teacher or learner
Language teaching objectives
balance between embedding and activity clear preference
for learner use of IWB
balanced use of IWB for skills and subskills
limited range of tools and features used
clear preference for learner use of IWB much more speaking + listening
than reading + writing
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups
strong focus on vocabulary also pronunciation
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups rare use for grammar
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
408Whyte Cutrim Schmid van Hazebrouck Thompson amp Oberhofer (in press)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
ITILT RESEARCH
9
teachers showed high self-efficacy perceptions for ICT lower confidence with IWB tools but encouraged learners to use the IWBHillier Beauchamp Whyte (2013)
primary teachers used narrow range of basic tools for circumscribed goals irrespective of IWB experience Whyte Beauchamp Hillier (2012)
teachers had differing views of IWB affordances for language teaching Whyte et al (in press)
background
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4011
TEACHER A
high ICT confidence amp IWB convictions
moderate IWB confidence
limited range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Because I worked before and now Im only
with the children Working with them not thinking what Im writing at the moment able to
concentrate on the pupils
Because there are some people visual and
auditive And I think that visual can help because they remember what is
written
Video example
Apprentice level 2
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
study
ITILT FRANCE
1 how did French teachers use the IWB over the course of the project
2 how can teachers IWB use be accounted for
3 what interactional opportunities were provided for learners
12
Research questions
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
method
FRENCH DATA
9 EFL teachers (primary middle secondary university)
56 classroom clips 16 teacher and learner interviews teacher questionnaire data focus group and online community
contributions
13
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4014
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
BACKGROUND DATAprimary
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4015
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
middle
secondary
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4016
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
university
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
analysis
QUALITATIVE amp QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES
coding of 56 class video clips- IWB tools amp features- user teacher vs learner- teaching objectives
analysis of ICT questionnaire + online community participation
development of IWB language teacher profiles
17
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4018
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
teacher profiles23
TEACHER H
low IWB confidence amp convictions
narrow range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
I have been able to use the board I am not very creative
with it and my only useful skills so far are flashing up
documents that I had already prepared on Open Office and the having the pupils
writehighlight on them to do what we would have been
doing with photocopies This saves paper and does make it more generally interactive It
also gets them inter-correcting much more
Video example
Beginner level 1
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4024
IWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachers
IWB tools and features
IWB user teacher or learner
Language teaching objectives
balance between embedding and activity clear preference
for learner use of IWB
balanced use of IWB for skills and subskills
limited range of tools and features used
clear preference for learner use of IWB much more speaking + listening
than reading + writing
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups
strong focus on vocabulary also pronunciation
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups rare use for grammar
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
ITILT RESEARCH
9
teachers showed high self-efficacy perceptions for ICT lower confidence with IWB tools but encouraged learners to use the IWBHillier Beauchamp Whyte (2013)
primary teachers used narrow range of basic tools for circumscribed goals irrespective of IWB experience Whyte Beauchamp Hillier (2012)
teachers had differing views of IWB affordances for language teaching Whyte et al (in press)
background
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4011
TEACHER A
high ICT confidence amp IWB convictions
moderate IWB confidence
limited range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Because I worked before and now Im only
with the children Working with them not thinking what Im writing at the moment able to
concentrate on the pupils
Because there are some people visual and
auditive And I think that visual can help because they remember what is
written
Video example
Apprentice level 2
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
study
ITILT FRANCE
1 how did French teachers use the IWB over the course of the project
2 how can teachers IWB use be accounted for
3 what interactional opportunities were provided for learners
12
Research questions
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
method
FRENCH DATA
9 EFL teachers (primary middle secondary university)
56 classroom clips 16 teacher and learner interviews teacher questionnaire data focus group and online community
contributions
13
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4014
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
BACKGROUND DATAprimary
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4015
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
middle
secondary
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4016
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
university
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
analysis
QUALITATIVE amp QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES
coding of 56 class video clips- IWB tools amp features- user teacher vs learner- teaching objectives
analysis of ICT questionnaire + online community participation
development of IWB language teacher profiles
17
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4018
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
teacher profiles23
TEACHER H
low IWB confidence amp convictions
narrow range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
I have been able to use the board I am not very creative
with it and my only useful skills so far are flashing up
documents that I had already prepared on Open Office and the having the pupils
writehighlight on them to do what we would have been
doing with photocopies This saves paper and does make it more generally interactive It
also gets them inter-correcting much more
Video example
Beginner level 1
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4024
IWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachers
IWB tools and features
IWB user teacher or learner
Language teaching objectives
balance between embedding and activity clear preference
for learner use of IWB
balanced use of IWB for skills and subskills
limited range of tools and features used
clear preference for learner use of IWB much more speaking + listening
than reading + writing
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups
strong focus on vocabulary also pronunciation
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups rare use for grammar
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4011
TEACHER A
high ICT confidence amp IWB convictions
moderate IWB confidence
limited range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Because I worked before and now Im only
with the children Working with them not thinking what Im writing at the moment able to
concentrate on the pupils
Because there are some people visual and
auditive And I think that visual can help because they remember what is
written
Video example
Apprentice level 2
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
study
ITILT FRANCE
1 how did French teachers use the IWB over the course of the project
2 how can teachers IWB use be accounted for
3 what interactional opportunities were provided for learners
12
Research questions
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
method
FRENCH DATA
9 EFL teachers (primary middle secondary university)
56 classroom clips 16 teacher and learner interviews teacher questionnaire data focus group and online community
contributions
13
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4014
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
BACKGROUND DATAprimary
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4015
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
middle
secondary
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4016
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
university
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
analysis
QUALITATIVE amp QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES
coding of 56 class video clips- IWB tools amp features- user teacher vs learner- teaching objectives
analysis of ICT questionnaire + online community participation
development of IWB language teacher profiles
17
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4018
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
teacher profiles23
TEACHER H
low IWB confidence amp convictions
narrow range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
I have been able to use the board I am not very creative
with it and my only useful skills so far are flashing up
documents that I had already prepared on Open Office and the having the pupils
writehighlight on them to do what we would have been
doing with photocopies This saves paper and does make it more generally interactive It
also gets them inter-correcting much more
Video example
Beginner level 1
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4024
IWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachers
IWB tools and features
IWB user teacher or learner
Language teaching objectives
balance between embedding and activity clear preference
for learner use of IWB
balanced use of IWB for skills and subskills
limited range of tools and features used
clear preference for learner use of IWB much more speaking + listening
than reading + writing
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups
strong focus on vocabulary also pronunciation
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups rare use for grammar
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
study
ITILT FRANCE
1 how did French teachers use the IWB over the course of the project
2 how can teachers IWB use be accounted for
3 what interactional opportunities were provided for learners
12
Research questions
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
method
FRENCH DATA
9 EFL teachers (primary middle secondary university)
56 classroom clips 16 teacher and learner interviews teacher questionnaire data focus group and online community
contributions
13
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4014
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
BACKGROUND DATAprimary
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4015
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
middle
secondary
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4016
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
university
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
analysis
QUALITATIVE amp QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES
coding of 56 class video clips- IWB tools amp features- user teacher vs learner- teaching objectives
analysis of ICT questionnaire + online community participation
development of IWB language teacher profiles
17
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4018
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
teacher profiles23
TEACHER H
low IWB confidence amp convictions
narrow range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
I have been able to use the board I am not very creative
with it and my only useful skills so far are flashing up
documents that I had already prepared on Open Office and the having the pupils
writehighlight on them to do what we would have been
doing with photocopies This saves paper and does make it more generally interactive It
also gets them inter-correcting much more
Video example
Beginner level 1
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4024
IWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachers
IWB tools and features
IWB user teacher or learner
Language teaching objectives
balance between embedding and activity clear preference
for learner use of IWB
balanced use of IWB for skills and subskills
limited range of tools and features used
clear preference for learner use of IWB much more speaking + listening
than reading + writing
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups
strong focus on vocabulary also pronunciation
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups rare use for grammar
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
method
FRENCH DATA
9 EFL teachers (primary middle secondary university)
56 classroom clips 16 teacher and learner interviews teacher questionnaire data focus group and online community
contributions
13
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4014
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
BACKGROUND DATAprimary
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4015
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
middle
secondary
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4016
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
university
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
analysis
QUALITATIVE amp QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES
coding of 56 class video clips- IWB tools amp features- user teacher vs learner- teaching objectives
analysis of ICT questionnaire + online community participation
development of IWB language teacher profiles
17
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4018
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
teacher profiles23
TEACHER H
low IWB confidence amp convictions
narrow range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
I have been able to use the board I am not very creative
with it and my only useful skills so far are flashing up
documents that I had already prepared on Open Office and the having the pupils
writehighlight on them to do what we would have been
doing with photocopies This saves paper and does make it more generally interactive It
also gets them inter-correcting much more
Video example
Beginner level 1
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4024
IWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachers
IWB tools and features
IWB user teacher or learner
Language teaching objectives
balance between embedding and activity clear preference
for learner use of IWB
balanced use of IWB for skills and subskills
limited range of tools and features used
clear preference for learner use of IWB much more speaking + listening
than reading + writing
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups
strong focus on vocabulary also pronunciation
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups rare use for grammar
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4014
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
BACKGROUND DATAprimary
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4015
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
middle
secondary
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4016
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
university
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
analysis
QUALITATIVE amp QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES
coding of 56 class video clips- IWB tools amp features- user teacher vs learner- teaching objectives
analysis of ICT questionnaire + online community participation
development of IWB language teacher profiles
17
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4018
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
teacher profiles23
TEACHER H
low IWB confidence amp convictions
narrow range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
I have been able to use the board I am not very creative
with it and my only useful skills so far are flashing up
documents that I had already prepared on Open Office and the having the pupils
writehighlight on them to do what we would have been
doing with photocopies This saves paper and does make it more generally interactive It
also gets them inter-correcting much more
Video example
Beginner level 1
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4024
IWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachers
IWB tools and features
IWB user teacher or learner
Language teaching objectives
balance between embedding and activity clear preference
for learner use of IWB
balanced use of IWB for skills and subskills
limited range of tools and features used
clear preference for learner use of IWB much more speaking + listening
than reading + writing
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups
strong focus on vocabulary also pronunciation
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups rare use for grammar
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4015
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
middle
secondary
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4016
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
university
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
analysis
QUALITATIVE amp QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES
coding of 56 class video clips- IWB tools amp features- user teacher vs learner- teaching objectives
analysis of ICT questionnaire + online community participation
development of IWB language teacher profiles
17
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4018
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
teacher profiles23
TEACHER H
low IWB confidence amp convictions
narrow range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
I have been able to use the board I am not very creative
with it and my only useful skills so far are flashing up
documents that I had already prepared on Open Office and the having the pupils
writehighlight on them to do what we would have been
doing with photocopies This saves paper and does make it more generally interactive It
also gets them inter-correcting much more
Video example
Beginner level 1
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4024
IWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachers
IWB tools and features
IWB user teacher or learner
Language teaching objectives
balance between embedding and activity clear preference
for learner use of IWB
balanced use of IWB for skills and subskills
limited range of tools and features used
clear preference for learner use of IWB much more speaking + listening
than reading + writing
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups
strong focus on vocabulary also pronunciation
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups rare use for grammar
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4016
0
10
20
30
40
50
A B C D E F H I G
40 40
20
30 30
20
40
30
50
20 20
10 10 10 10
20
10
30
3 3
0
3
0
3
0
5
1
IWB teaching age
years
university
BACKGROUND DATA
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
analysis
QUALITATIVE amp QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES
coding of 56 class video clips- IWB tools amp features- user teacher vs learner- teaching objectives
analysis of ICT questionnaire + online community participation
development of IWB language teacher profiles
17
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4018
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
teacher profiles23
TEACHER H
low IWB confidence amp convictions
narrow range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
I have been able to use the board I am not very creative
with it and my only useful skills so far are flashing up
documents that I had already prepared on Open Office and the having the pupils
writehighlight on them to do what we would have been
doing with photocopies This saves paper and does make it more generally interactive It
also gets them inter-correcting much more
Video example
Beginner level 1
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4024
IWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachers
IWB tools and features
IWB user teacher or learner
Language teaching objectives
balance between embedding and activity clear preference
for learner use of IWB
balanced use of IWB for skills and subskills
limited range of tools and features used
clear preference for learner use of IWB much more speaking + listening
than reading + writing
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups
strong focus on vocabulary also pronunciation
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups rare use for grammar
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
analysis
QUALITATIVE amp QUANTITATIVE ANALYSES
coding of 56 class video clips- IWB tools amp features- user teacher vs learner- teaching objectives
analysis of ICT questionnaire + online community participation
development of IWB language teacher profiles
17
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4018
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
teacher profiles23
TEACHER H
low IWB confidence amp convictions
narrow range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
I have been able to use the board I am not very creative
with it and my only useful skills so far are flashing up
documents that I had already prepared on Open Office and the having the pupils
writehighlight on them to do what we would have been
doing with photocopies This saves paper and does make it more generally interactive It
also gets them inter-correcting much more
Video example
Beginner level 1
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4024
IWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachers
IWB tools and features
IWB user teacher or learner
Language teaching objectives
balance between embedding and activity clear preference
for learner use of IWB
balanced use of IWB for skills and subskills
limited range of tools and features used
clear preference for learner use of IWB much more speaking + listening
than reading + writing
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups
strong focus on vocabulary also pronunciation
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups rare use for grammar
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4018
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
teacher profiles23
TEACHER H
low IWB confidence amp convictions
narrow range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
I have been able to use the board I am not very creative
with it and my only useful skills so far are flashing up
documents that I had already prepared on Open Office and the having the pupils
writehighlight on them to do what we would have been
doing with photocopies This saves paper and does make it more generally interactive It
also gets them inter-correcting much more
Video example
Beginner level 1
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4024
IWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachers
IWB tools and features
IWB user teacher or learner
Language teaching objectives
balance between embedding and activity clear preference
for learner use of IWB
balanced use of IWB for skills and subskills
limited range of tools and features used
clear preference for learner use of IWB much more speaking + listening
than reading + writing
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups
strong focus on vocabulary also pronunciation
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups rare use for grammar
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
teacher profiles23
TEACHER H
low IWB confidence amp convictions
narrow range of tools and teaching objectives
peripheral participation in IWB community
I have been able to use the board I am not very creative
with it and my only useful skills so far are flashing up
documents that I had already prepared on Open Office and the having the pupils
writehighlight on them to do what we would have been
doing with photocopies This saves paper and does make it more generally interactive It
also gets them inter-correcting much more
Video example
Beginner level 1
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4024
IWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachers
IWB tools and features
IWB user teacher or learner
Language teaching objectives
balance between embedding and activity clear preference
for learner use of IWB
balanced use of IWB for skills and subskills
limited range of tools and features used
clear preference for learner use of IWB much more speaking + listening
than reading + writing
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups
strong focus on vocabulary also pronunciation
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups rare use for grammar
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4024
IWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachersIWB use by 9 French teachers
IWB tools and features
IWB user teacher or learner
Language teaching objectives
balance between embedding and activity clear preference
for learner use of IWB
balanced use of IWB for skills and subskills
limited range of tools and features used
clear preference for learner use of IWB much more speaking + listening
than reading + writing
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups
strong focus on vocabulary also pronunciation
focus on basic features images + sounds pen + dragdrop
individual learner at IWB not pairs or groups rare use for grammar
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Limited range of basic features
used to teach oral skills and vocabulary
with individual learners at the IWB
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4026
Google+ private stream
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4028
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
Participation in online support network(Whyte amp Alexander 2013)
passive
peripheral
core
bullfew posts none independentbullno mediabullfew themes
C (primary)I (secondary)G (teacher training)
bullposts and commentsbullsome mediabullfocus on few themes (technology project social)
A (primary)E (middle)H (secondary)
bullgreater initiativebullmore posts + commentsbullmore media (video links)bullvariety of themes
B D (primary) F (middle)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4029
IWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachersIWB user profiles for language teachers
Teacher H
Teacher A
Teacher F
Teacher D
IWB use ICTIWB background Project participation
Beauchamp framework
bull pen tool no IWB software
bull 100 individual learner bull writing
bull limited IWB access no experience
bull high ICT very low IWB self-efficacy
bull no IWB convictions
peripheral beginner
bull images drag amp dropbull individual learner
whole-classbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB access experience
bull high ICT lower IWB self-efficacy
bull strong IWB convictions
peripheral apprentice
bull range of toolsbull 100 individual learnerbull speaking range of skills
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions
core initiate
bull wide range of toolsbull 88 individual learnerbull vocabulary listening
bull good IWB accessbull experienced userbull high ICTIWB self-
efficacybull strong IWB convictions innovative advanced
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4030
TEACHER F
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
range of tools and teaching objectives
core participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
They can play it again They can listen again And they can do it at home too because I put this at the
ENT so they can do it at home
Video example
Initiate level 3
And what also strikes me is the fact that he is quite autonomous he can play it again without asking
you
Yes and Im not even there [hellip] They can be autonomous They
can work by themselves
F
F
R
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4032
TEACHER D
high ICT amp IWB confidence amp strong IWB convictions
wide range of tools and teaching objectives
innovative participation in IWB community
teacher profiles
Et ici quest-ce quil fallait faire [What did you have to do here]
Il fallait en fait passer agrave travers pour aller through
[In fact you had to go through]
Voilagrave parce quil passait dans la grotte [Thats right because it was going into the cave]
Video example
Advanced level 3
Parce que cest sa maison la grotte [Because the cave is its house]
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4034
Framework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWBFramework for language teacher development with IWB
1
2
3
IWB use teacher development classroom practice
bull little experienceaccessbull low IWB beliefs bull low self-efficacy bull limited tool use + teaching
goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull decontextualised language practice
bull IWB as whiteboard substitute (no software)
bull more IWB experiencebull higher IWB beliefsbull moderate self-efficacybull different user patterns but
limited goals
bull peripheral participationbull (negative) focus on
technology + project
bull technical rather than pedagogical interactivity
bull limited interactional opportunities
bull experienced IWB userbull high self-efficacy and beliefsbull range of tools + goals
bull core participant in development programme
bull interest and initiative in range of teaching and technology issues
bull contextualised language practice
bull focus on learning opportunities
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
more interaction
DEVELOPING INTERACTIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
analysing teacher-learner and learner-learner interaction at the IWB
using the IWB to support live communication
35
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4036
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
IWB use for language interaction (Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid in preparation)
drill
display
simulation
communication
planningcontrol context task
pre-planned language elements
limited attempt to contextualise language
production amp repetition with teacher feedback on form
some learner choice in language to be produced
limited attempt to contextualise language
activity largely controlled by teacher
greater space for learner choice
role-play pretend contextspace for learner choice in shaping activity
spontaneous language production
genuine exchange of participantsrsquo own reactions
learner-centred meaning-focused activity
Cutrim Schmid amp Whyte 2013
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4037
live video communication
young learners of English as a lingua franca
IWB for interactional support
interactional opportunities
Whyte amp Cutrim Schmid (forthcoming)
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
4038
bullAlexander J (2013) The IWB in EFL the IWB for EFL using the IWB to teach EFL in French educational settings (Unpublished masters thesis) Universiteacute Nice Sophia Antipolis Nice Francebull Beauchamp G (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard (IWB) in primary schools ndash Towards an effective
transition framework Technology Pedagogy and Education13 (3) 327ndash348bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2013) Interactive Whiteboards in the EFL Classroom Findings of the European
Project iTILT Guest lecture Institute of English Studies Leuphana Universitaumlt Luumlneberg Luumlneberg Germany 18 June
bull Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (2012) Interactive Whiteboards in School Settings Teacher Responses to Socio-constructivist Hegemonies Language Learning and Technology 16 (2) 65-86 [PDF]
bull Hillier E Beauchamp G amp Whyte S (2013) A study of self-efficacy in the use of interactive whiteboards across educational settings a European perspective from the iTILT project Educational Futures 5 (2) [PDF]
bull Whyte S (2011) Learning to teach with videoconferencing in primary foreign language classrooms ReCALL 23(3) 271ndash293
bull Whyte S amp Alexander J (2013) Learning to Use Interactive Technologies for Language Teaching Video Diaries for Teacher Support in the iTILT Project Atelier didactique SAES Dijon 18 May [PDF]
bull Whyte S Beauchamp G amp Hillier E (2012) Perceptions of the IWB for second language teaching and learning the iTILT project In L Bradley amp S Thoueumlsny (Eds) CALL Using Learning Knowing EUROCALL Conference Gothenburg Sweden 22-25 August 2012 Proceedings (pp 320-6) copy Research-publishingnet Dublin [PDF]
bull Whyte S amp Cutrim Schmid E (forthcoming) A task-based approach to video communication with the IWB a French-German primary EFL class exchange In Cutrim Schmid E amp Whyte S (Eds) Interactive whiteboards and language teacher professional development Advances in Digital Language Learning and Teaching (Series editors Michael Thomas Mark Warschauer amp Mark Peterson) Continuum
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E amp van Hazebrouck S (2011) Designing IWB Resources for Language Teaching the iTILT Project International Conference on ICT for Language Learning 4th Edition Simonelli Editore [PDF]
bull Whyte S Cutrim Schmid E van Hazebrouck S amp Oberhofer M (in press) Open educational resources for CALL teacher education the iTILT interactive whiteboard project Computer Assisted Language Learning
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu
Shona Whyte WorldCALL Glasgow 13 July 2013
40
contact
Interaction and interactivity in technology-rich second language classrooms
the iTILT project in France
39
Shona Whytewhyteunicefrhttpeflunicefrwhyshona
httpitilteu