Innovation: From Research to Practice - NUI Galway...PART 1 Three approaches to innovating in a...
Transcript of Innovation: From Research to Practice - NUI Galway...PART 1 Three approaches to innovating in a...
Page 1
Innovation: From Research to Practice
Professor Julian Birkinshaw
London Business School
Intertrade Ireland Innovation Programme, June 9th 2009
Page 2
Today’s context
Deep recession
Businesspeople have lost credibility
Questioning of Ireland’s economic model
What role will innovation play in the recovery?
What insights does our research have to offer
businesspeople and policymakers?
Page 3
PART 1
Three approaches to innovating in a downturn
1. Innovation is not just new technologies and new
products
2. Don’t try to do it all yourself
3. Adopt a more experimental approach
Page 4
1. Not just new technologies and products
IBM’s Global CEO study 2006: Expanding the Innovation Horizon
0
10
20
30
40
50
Products/services Operations Business model
Percent emphasisallocated to eachtype
Page 5
Which companies spend the most on R&D?
Page 6
“There is no significant
relationship between R&D
spending and financial or
corporate success”
Booz Allen Hamilton Global Innovation 1000 survey 2006
Page 7
Management modelinnovation
Business model innovation
Product or Service innovation
Technological innovation
Operationalinnovation
Higher
Lower
Potential
for long-
term
advantage
Page 8
Innovation over the lifecycle:
The classic view of the computer industry
Computer Industry evolution Filson, JEBO, 2002
1974 2000
Number of
playersPriceSales
Technology
innovation as
source of
advantage
Product
innovation as
source of
advantage
Process
innovation as
source of
advantage
Consolidation
and exit
strategies
Page 9
Business Model Innovation:
A new way of making money in an existing industry
Page 10
Business model innovation can be seen at all
stages of the industry life cycle
1974 2000
Dell Direct Model
Apple
Mac
integrated
system
Apple iMac
experience
IT services & support
Page 11
Management Model Innovation:
A new way of working internally that creates value in the
marketplace
Page 12
Long-run changes in competitive
position in the automobile industry
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
Page 13
2. Don’t do it all yourself
The appeal of Open Innovation
– Innocentive: Network of >160,000 available to solve
technology challenges
– Topcoder: Network of >170,000 software developers
around the world
When is an “open” model optimal?
Page 14
A framework for open innovation
Concentrated Dispersed
Full control &
ownershipNo controlling
entity; IP open
Distrust of
others, NIH
Trust and
reciprocity
Where is Knowledge?
How is it accessed
and managed?
Why do individuals
choose to share?
Page 15
Possible innovation archetypes
Concentrated Dispersed
Full control &
ownershipNo controlling
entity; IP open
Distrust of
others, NIH
Trust and
reciprocity
Traditional closed model Fully open model Hybrid open model
Page 16
Some (well-known) examples
P&G Connect & Develop
Benefits:
– 35% of innovation accessed externally in 2004
– R&D productivity up by 60%
– Enormous media coverage
Possible risks:
– Loss of control
– Loss of competitive differentiation
– Takes time to deliver results
– Opportunity cost of investment in open innovation
Page 17
NVP Brightstar
Lucent New Ventures Group
BT Brightstar
NVP Brightstar80% of portfolio of 27 start-ups;
price recovered with IPO of one
for $470m
“BT cannot do this stuff. It has to be managed in an independent entity” - Harry Berry
Page 18
IBM InnovationJam
Jam = online collaborative brainstorm event
ValuesJam 2003– 10,000 postings over 72-hour period
InnovationJam, August 2006– Employees, friends, clients debated 4 major themes (e.g. “going places”)– 30,000 postings in round one, 5,000 in round two – Ten major initiatives launched by IBM, November 2006
Online data not owned by IBM– We are betting there is enough expertise in IBM that we can apply these
insights for commercial ends ahead of our competitors. We are living in an era of open innovation, and we are betting with initiatives like InnovationJam that we can stay ahead of the tsunami of commoditization in our industry. But it is inherent in this approach that you don’t know where open innovation will take you.”
Page 19
Key points from examples
“Hybrid” open innovation models still unproven in practice
– Some parts of system sit uneasily with others
Open innovation is a “leap of faith”
Can you really create new ideas by tapping into the
wisdom of the crowd?
Page 20
Challenges in pursuing open innovation
Message for companies: no half measures– Sharing ideas is a two-way street
– New attitudes needed towards control/ownership
– Open innovation means less control, more use of partners who can
do it better than you can
Message for academics: a phenomenon in need of theory– When is open innovation damaging? What are is limits?
– What are the most appropriate theoretical underpinnings?
Page 21
3. Adopt a more experimental approach
Innovation does not have to be risky and expensive
Page 22
Radical is not the same as risky
Page 23
Shell Gamechanger:
A process for de-risking crazy ideas
Outcomes: 40% of projects in E&P division came out of Gamechanger
1
3
4
5
6
7
2
1. Idea submission: Anyone, any time
2. Peer review: Within a week
3. Test & Mature: Testing hypotheses
4. Expert review
5. Is there a compelling value proposition?
6. Technical feasibility
7. What is the business logic?
Which part of Shell will
take it on?
Page 24
Innovation as a portfolio game
Ideas Experiments Ventures Businesses
1000
100
10
1
Often the most
interesting ideas come
from the most peripheral
parts of the company
Page 25
An experimental approach to product innovation
Control group
Standard $125
package: free
room, two steak
meals, $30 chips
Test group
$60 in chipsHypothesis: Slot
players do not
really value perks
such as free hotel
rooms
Average net
profit per
customer $60
Average net
profit per
customer $30
Page 26
Key points about experimentation
How can you maximise the ratio of learning to investment?
How can you ensure you cast the net widely enough?
How can we make the concept of an “experiment” more
acceptable?
– Pilot and Prototype are safer words
Page 27
PART 2:
Innovation in the foreign-owned sector
What does research tell us about how foreign subsidiaries
evolve? And what is the role of innovation in this process?
General lessons for creating an environment that facilitates
innovation
Page 28
Transient investment
Branch plant syndrome
The tyranny of distance
Changing corporate structures
Strategic challenges facing foreign subsidiaries
Page 29
The heart of the problem:
Low visibility in head office
"Nobody wakes up in head office thinking about what
they can do in Ireland today”
"As a subsidiary, we don't just wait our turn to be
handed manufacturing opportunities. If we waited,
our turn would never come."
Page 30
Subsidiaries are increasingly competing with each
other:
Competition from
other subsidiaries
with similar
activities
Competition from the
external marketplace
Internal competition
from new locations
(e.g. East Europe, Far
East)
Increasing internal competition
Page 31
The threat of divestment:
Motorola in the last downturn
East
Ki l br i de Semi conduct o
r pl ant , 1985, 1000 peopl e
Sout h
Queensf er r y Semi co
nduct or pl ant , 1984
f r om DEC, 600 peopl e
Li vi ngst on mobi l e
phone pl ant , 1995, 3100
peopl e
Dunfermline Semicondu
ctor plant, 2000
from Hyundai, £ 1. 3
bi l l i on
CLOSED 2001
CLOSED 2002
MOTHBALLED 2002
NEW GLOBAL CENTRE FOR SMART CARDS
Page 32
The changing role of the country manager
Uncont est ed aut hor i t y
over count r y
oper at i on
No aut hor i t y
over count r y
oper at i on
AUTONOMOUS LEADERSHIP STRATEGIC GUIDANCE SUPPORT AND DEVELOPMENT LEGAL REPRESENTATION
1980s 1990s
2000s
Page 33
Changing roles of the country manager
Pioneer
Defines the territory, builds initial relationships
7-16
Less critical
Essential but
not enough
Increasingly
important
Increasingly
critical
Trader
Builds profitable operations, develops local resources,
contributes to overall strategy
Intelligence-gather
Analyses local environment, develops innovative ideas
for input to overall strategy
Quarterback
Confers with HQ coaches to advocate the field view;
motivates team; networks; maintains drive
Source: Chris Bartlett
Page 34
How subsidiaries develop: Idealised scenario
Strategic
Importance to
company
Establish
start-up
Carry out
basic
mandate
Perform
basic
mandate in
superior
way
Extend
basic
mandate -
low risk
moves
Extend
basic
mandate.
Strategic
develop-
ment
Become
strategic
centre for
company
Become
strategic
pivot for
key
activities
Basic Mandate
Enhanced
Mandate
Advanced
Mandate
Source: Delany, 1998
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Source: Ed Delany
Page 35
Carving out a role that suits your situation
Establish
start-up
Carry out
basic
mandate
Perform
basic
mandate in
superior
way
Extend
basic
mandate -
low risk
moves
Extend
basic
mandate.
Strategic
develop-
ment
Become
strategic
centre for
company
Become
strategic
pivot for
key
activities
3M Canada
Fuj i t su Aust r al i a
NCR Scot l and
Page 36
Taking a small slice of the action:
The case of the New Beetle
Expl or at i on
of Concept
Val i dat i on and
desi gn
Scal e up,
commer ci al i sat i o
n
Rol l out and
i nt egr at e
2 peopl e
i n US: Why
not ?
Gai ned key
suppor t er s
i n Ger many
US desi gn
cent r e di d
desi gn
Tr ansf er r ed t o Ger many
f or devel opment and
pr oduct i on
Level of
devel opment
Ti me
Page 37
An attention perspective on subsidiary
development
Demand for
executive
attention
Supply of
executive
attention
Highly constrained by
number of working hours
Technology (e.g.
videoconferencing) helps
but only so far…
Increasing demands from
multiple constituencies
Internal: Growing spans of
control, matrix relationships,
global scope
External: Economic and
political “shocks”, special
interest groups etc.
Page 38
How is attention channelled and filtered?
Need to be conscious of the primary attention “channels”
through which attention is filtered
Through
meetings,
forums, events
Through direct
reporting
relationships
Gaining the attention
of the CEO
By targeting “hot”
issues for the CEO
Through formal
budgeting /
planning process
Through external
influencers
Page 39
So who gets attention in a global firm?
Squeaky
Wheels
success stories,
vocal managers,
problem cases
Honeypots
Big opportunities
or threats but little
current activity
Attention given to a country on basis of external
cues (or top down “attention structures”)
Attention given to
a country on basis
of internal cues
(bottom-up
“attention
structures”)
Low
Attention
Markets
Major
Markets
High
Low
Low High
Page 40
Operationalising attention: BOC Group
10 100
JapanUK
Canada
US
South
Africa
AustraliaChina
France
Italy, Spain India
MexicoGermany
Russia0
Number of mentions of country (log scale)
Number of mentions
of subsidiary
operation (log scale) 10
100
Singapore
Page 41
Drivers of attention
Weight
– Strategic significance of local environment
– Strength of subsidiary within network
Voice
– Initiative-taking
– Profile-building
Voice-based activities more critical when subsidiary is further away, and more effective when subsidiary has strong competence
Page 42
Can you gain attention and autonomy?
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
R=-.13
Level of
autonomy
Level of attention
26 out of 101
subsidiary
companies
achieve both
Page 43
Sample of Australian subsidiaries: Initiative as a way of gaining attention and autonomy
Autonomy
X
Attention
Initiative-taking
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
R=.54
Very strong
relationship
Page 44
Basic advice to subsidiary managers
Perform basic mandate to high level
– “you can do what you like once you are a high
performer”
Take initiative, build profile
– Do not accept status quo, always look out for new
opportunities
Be very clear on your own strengths and weaknesses
Page 45
Diagnosing strengths & weaknesses
PERCEIVED OPPORTUNITIES
St at e of i ndust r y,
st r at egy of
par ent , l ocal
mar ket
CAPABILITES
Exi st i ng act i vi t i es, t r ack r ecor d, cr edi bi l i t y
of t op t eam
Low
Low
Hi gh
Hi gh
OVERSTRETCH
MISSED OPPORTUNITIES
MONSANTO
CANADA
Bid for $100m
manufacturing
investment 1985
PLASCO UK
No initiative
MONSANTO
CANADA
Series of small and
successful bids
1990-95
Page 46
Developing an action plan
Tactics for approaching HQ
– Identifying key degrees of freedom, possible openings
– Identifying key influencers, sponsors etc.
Match ambition with capabilities
Build peninsulas not islands
– Make sure what you are doing matters to HQ
Sharpen your “Quarterback” skills
Page 47
What does the “quarterback” really do?
Global Networker– Raising the profile of the business elsewhere in the
company
– “Oiling the wheels” of major projects
– Placing executives in senior corporate positions
Page 48
What does the “quarterback” really do?
Global Networker
Entrepreneur and Catalyst for change– “Most country managers are builders: they are
aggressive and career-seeking types. So they cannot
hide for long, even if it would be in their interests to do
so!”
Page 49
What does the “quarterback” really do?
Global networker
Entrepreneur and catalyst for change
Advocate and Defender of the country operation– My loyalty is to the region first, and the company second. What I
fight for is: How much of a particular programme (such as a cost-cutting drive) am I going to pick up for my region? Remember, you earn the right to self sufficiency by flying in formation when you have to.”
– “You are stupid if you don’t keep some things up your sleeve. You have to manage expectations, which involves not telling the whole story until you are ready. So I act as a buffer.”
Page 50
POSTSCRIPT:
Building a culture that sustains innovation
Conditions for innovation to happen:
– Openness to new ideas from outside
– Novel, surprising connections
– Slack – time and resources
– Tolerance of failure
Page 51
What does an
innovative environment look like?
CONSTRAINT CHAOS
Page 52
The elements of an entrepreneurial environment
Overall Direction
“Stretch Goal”
Space to
Act
Clear
Boundaries
Support
from Above
Page 53
Freedom… within limits