INFOR 10 ERP DISCRETE iENTERPRISE (XA) FINANCIALS … · Financials Redevelopment Enterprise...
Transcript of INFOR 10 ERP DISCRETE iENTERPRISE (XA) FINANCIALS … · Financials Redevelopment Enterprise...
INFOR 10 ERP DISCRETE iENTERPRISE (XA)
FINANCIALS ROADMAP
Agenda
Financials Systems History
Existing Financial Applications
Financials Redevelopment
Enterprise General Ledger
Transition Plans
2
Financial Systems History
3 Copyright © 2011 Infor. All rights reserved.
Financials Systems History
In the Beginning:
MAPICS was designed as a midrange system
Smaller customers
Single site
Single currency
Mostly US based
Thus was born Accounting Management
GL, AP and AR
Easy to implement, easy to use
Standard GAAP accounting
Standard chart of accounts structure, but limited
Basic reporting capability
Copyright © 2009 Infor. All rights reserved. www.infor.com. 4
Financials System History
MAPICS grows rapidly, so do our customers
Some customers “outgrow” AM Financials
Multiple sites
Multiple countries
Growth from medium/small companies to large companies
IBM sells MAPICS to large companies (Pepsi, GE, IBM)
MAPICS is actively sold overseas (almost 40% of customers)
Thus was born International Financial Management
Globalized, multi everything
IFRS compliant – pretty much
Unusual chart of accounts (units and natures)
Copyright © 2009 Infor. All rights reserved. www.infor.com. 5
Financials System History
AM Customers Want More
IFM is overkill, but AM “wasn’t quite there”
IFM was harder to implement – and “units and natures?”
Power-Link technology was coming – we want it
Thus was born AM Plus
Current technology
Simple and reliable AM backbone
Not quite finished
Copyright © 2009 Infor. All rights reserved. www.infor.com. 6
Financials System History
Financial Reporting becomes “old school”
The green screen way of creating reports was fine – until it wasn’t
Both AM and IFM are affected
Thus was born FRx
More reporting power, much easier to use
“industry standard” – sort of
Third party product – Microsoft
Copyright © 2009 Infor. All rights reserved. www.infor.com. 7
Financials System History
Microsoft decides to end FRx, Infor acquires financial reporting vendors
Thus was born Infor financial reporting
PM 10 for moderate to enterprise level reporting
F9 for simple reporting
Copyright © 2009 Infor. All rights reserved. www.infor.com. 8
Existing Financial Applications
9 Copyright © 2011 Infor. All rights reserved.
Existing Financial Applications
Small and medium sized customers
AM Plus
F9 financial reporting
Medium, large and global customers
IFM
PM 10 (now called CPM)
Dual systems = dual maintenance = less enhancement
Copyright © 2009 Infor. All rights reserved. www.infor.com. 10
Existing Financial Applications
AM Plus + F9 (or CPM) works very well for current customers
Challenges with IFRS compliance
Minimal development roadmap
IFM + CPM (or F9) works very well for current customers
Some workarounds for IFRS compliance
Slated for full IDF development, partially complete
Current design is somewhat cumbersome
Security is definitely cumbersome
Still has units and natures – a hard sell to new CFOs
Copyright © 2009 Infor. All rights reserved. www.infor.com. 11
Existing Financial Applications
Infor needed to develop a good answer for all customers
100% IDF technology, consistent with the rest of XA
“Normal” chart of accounts with segments
More account segments, more books, more business units
100% IFRS compliance
Fully globalized, enterprise functionality
Functionally equal to SAP, Oracle, etc.
Never lose a customer to a new CFO again
Enable global multi environment and global single environment
Deployable in a simplified “AM like” mode
Use IDF tailoring tied to Deployment Profiles (7.8)
Deploy to LX and System 21 customer bases – common System i solution
Copyright © 2011 Infor. All rights reserved. www.infor.com. 12
Existing Financial Applications
Where to start? General Ledger
IFM GL has issues, although partially in IDF now
AM GL cannot scale functionally
F9 and CPM cannot supplement core functionality enough to make the difference
Accounts Payable
IFM Accounts Payable is fairly strong, has partial IDF
AM Accounts Payable works fine, partial IDF
Accounts Receivable
IFM Accounts Receivable is fairly strong, has partial IDF
AM Accounts Receivable works fine, partial IDF
Fixed Assets
Being moved into core XA from the old FA application
Need for higher level of Fixed Assets functionality
Evaluating other Infor solutions
Copyright © 2009 Infor. All rights reserved. www.infor.com. 13
Existing Financial Applications
General Ledger is the first priority
AP and AR will be redeveloped after GL
XA Fixed Assets moving into core XA
Evaluating adopting other Infor solution for higher level Fixed Assets functionality
LX and System 21 – rejected
Infinium – rejected
Smart Stream – rejected
Lawson – next evaluation
Copyright © 2009 Infor. All rights reserved. www.infor.com. 14
Financials Redevelopment
15 Copyright © 2011 Infor. All rights reserved.
Financials Redevelopment
Complete replacement for IFM GL and AM GL
Source: LX Configurable Enterprise Accounting (CEA)
Equal or better functionality to SAP or Oracle
Seven years history with large global companies
IDF inquiries already completed (2009)
Designed to work with multiple ERP systems
Can work in parallel with IFM or AM
100% IFRS compliance, advanced global features
Model driven posting reduces maintenance needs throughout the ERP
Limited Availability Date – December 2011
Two pilot tests already completed with key customer
Copyright © 2009 Infor. All rights reserved. www.infor.com. 16
Financials Redevelopment
Address AP and AR redevelopment
Candidates – IFM and System 21
Will consider other Infor solutions as benchmarks
Evaluation should begin December 2011
Possible inclusion in Release 10
100% IDF technology will be used for redevelopment
Fixed Assets
Moving to core XA in process, possible January delivery
Evaluation of higher end solution in process, not expected until Q2 2012
Copyright © 2009 Infor. All rights reserved. www.infor.com. 17
Enterprise General Ledger
18 Copyright © 2011 Infor. All rights reserved.
Transition Plans
19 Copyright © 2011 Infor. All rights reserved.
Transition Plans
What does this mean to you?
Questions to ask:
What release level are you on?
Are you planning to upgrade to Release 9 or 10?
Are you using AM or IFM?
Are you using F9, CPM, FRx or ???
Would you like to change your chart of accounts?
Current chart doesn’t fully reflect reality
Want to get more out of it, but it’s too much work to manage
No thanks, I’m good.
Copyright © 2009 Infor. All rights reserved. www.infor.com. 20
Transition Plans
What release level are you on? Less than R9, take no action
Planning an upgrade? Complete the upgrade, then consider transitioning to EGLi
AM Customer Do not transition to IFM at this time
If you upgrade to release 9 or above, consider transition to EGLi
IFM Customer If you upgrade to release 9 or above, consider transition to EGLi
F9, CPM (PM 10) Customer EGLi will support both reporting tools
Probably Q2 2012 for full supported release of EGLi
Copyright © 2009 Infor. All rights reserved. www.infor.com. 21
Transition Plans
Chart of Accounts
EGLi chart of accounts is closer to AM than to IFM
IFM chart of accounts can be modeled in EGLi
If you like your current chart, take no action
If you want to make changes, wait for EGLi
If you wish you could make changes (but it is a maintenance nightmare), wait for EGLi and determine level of effort.
Copyright © 2009 Infor. All rights reserved. www.infor.com. 22