7th

INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INDUSTRIAL

ENGINEERING

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT,

FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING,

UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE, SERBIA

&

STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES,

STUTTGART, GERMANY

&

INNОVATION CENTER OF THE FACULTY OF

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING,

UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE

Editors:

Vesna Spasojević-Brkić

Mirjana Misita

Dragan D. Milanović

27th

-28th

September 2018

Belgrade, Serbia

Editors Vesna Spasojević-Brkić Mirjana Misita Dragan D. Milanović 7th INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING - SIE 2018, PROCEEDINGS Publisher Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Belgrade

Printing firm ''PLANETA PRINT'' d.o.o. Beograd

Published 2018 ISBN 978-86-7083-981-6 Sponzored by Government of the Republic of Serbia Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development

CIP - Каталогизација у публикацији - Народна библиотека Србије, Београд 005.22(082) 658.5(082) 006.83:338.45(082) INTERNATIONAL Symposium of Industrial Engineering (7th; 2018; Beograd) Proceedings / 7th International Symposium of Industrial Engineering - SIE 2018, 27th-28th September, 2018, Belgrade ; [organizers] Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade [and] Steinbeis Advanced Risk Technologies, Stuttgart, Germany [and] Innоvation Center of The Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade; editors Vesna Spasojević-Brkić, Mirjana Misita, Dragan D. Milanović. - Belgrade: Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, 2018 (Beograd: Planeta PRINT d.o.o.). - [9], 271 str. : ilustr. ; 30 cm Tekst štampan dvostubačno. - Tiraž 100. - Str. [4]: Preface / editors. - Bibliografija uz svaki rad. ISBN 978-86-7083-981-6 1. Spasojević-Brkić, Vesna [уредник] [аутор додатног текста], 1971- 2. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering (Beograd). Industrial Engineering Department a) Производња - Организација - Зборници b) Индустријски менаџмент - Зборници c) Индустрија - Систем квалитета - Зборници COBISS.SR-ID 217321228

Organizers of SIE 2018: INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, FACULTY OF MECHANICAL

ENGINEERING, UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE, SERBIA & STEINBEIS ADVANCED RISK TECHNOLOGIES, STUTTGART, GERMANY & INNОVATION CENTER OF THE FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, UNIVERSITY

OF BELGRADE

Program Advisory Committee

Chairperson: Spasojević-Brkić Vesna, FME,

Belgrade, SERBIA; Jovanović Aleksandar,

Stuttgart University, Stuttgart, GERMANY

• Babić Bojan, FME, UB (SRB) • Bragatto Paolo, INAIL (ITA) • Buchmeister Borut, University of Maribor (SLO) • Bugarić Uglješa, FME, UB (SRB) • Casadesus Marti, Universidad de Girona (ESP) • Csetverikov Dmitrij, Hungarian Academy of Sciences,

Institute for Computer Science and Control (HUN) • Cockalo Dragan, TF "Mihajlo Pupin", UNS (SRB) • Dondur Nikola, FME, UB (SRB) • Dźwiarek Marek, Central Institute for Labour

Protection – National Research Institute (POL) • Engh Erik, Web-Dev, Oslo (NOR) • Ferreira Pedro, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon &

FEES (PRT) • Filipović Jovan, FOS, UB (SRB); • Francalanza Emmanuel, FE, University of Malta

(MLT) • Gane Patrick, OY, Oftringen (CHE) • Karapetrovic Stanislav, University of Alberta (CAN) • Klarin Milivoj, TF "Mihajlo Pupin", UNS (SRB) • Kreiner Jesa, California State Universitiy, Fullerton

(USA) • Lalić Bojan, FTS, UNS (SRB) • Majstorović Vidosav, FME, UB (SRB) • Milanović D. Dragan, FME, UB (SRB) • Milazzo Francesca Maria, UM (ITA)

• Milosavljevic Pedja, FME, UN (SRB) • Mitrović Radivoje, FME, UB (SRB) • Minovski Robert, FME, Skoplje (MKD) • Misic Dimic Katarina, Aalto University (FIN) • Misita Mirjana, FME, UB (SRB) • Nunes Lopes Isabel, FCTUNL, Lisbon (PRT) • Petrović Dušan, FME, UB (SRB) • Popović Predrag, Institute Vinča (SRB) • Putnik Goran, Universidade de Minho (PRT) • Radenovic Stojan, FME, UB (SRB) • Radojević Slobodan, FME, UB (SRB) • Rakonjac Ivan, Serbian Innovation Fund (SRB) • Rožić Tomislav, FTTS, Zagreb (CRO) • Shuman Rutar Teodora, Seattle University (USA) • Sibalija Tatjana, MU, Belgrade (SRB) • Tadic Danijela, FEM, Kragujevac (SRB) • Tanović Ljubodrag, FME, UB (SRB) • Uzunovic-Zaimovic Nermina, FME, Zenica (BIH) • Valis David, UD (CZE) • Váncza József, MTA SZTAKI (HUN) • Veljković Zorica, FME, UB (SRB) • Mihajlović Ivan, TFB, Bor (SRB) • Zajac Mateusz, PW, Wroclaw (POL) • Živković Živan, TFB, Bor (SRB) • Žunjić Aleksandar, FME, UB (SRB) • Xiao-Guang Yue, IETI, Hong Kong (CHN) • Weiss John, University of Bradford, Bradford (UK)

Organizing Committee • Vesna Spasojevic-Brkic, PhD, Full Professor, FME, Belgrade, Serbia, Chairperson • Mirjana Misita, PhD, Full Professor, FME, Belgrade, Serbia • Sonja Josipović, PhD, FME, Belgrade, Assistant, Serbia • Tamara Golubović, PhD, FME, Belgrade, Assistant, Serbia

THE

A

Abstract. population modern trafto all its pato young cpedestrian differently world? Wenvironmensigns? Toexamines hyears of adifferent hindicated reaction tiChildren bmounted aimportanceappropriatKey words:Children. 1.INTRODIn modernwithout traimagine theThey did nlike as it issigns have Empire. Trguidelines,designed an

E IMPORTA

Aleksandar Tr

1 Faculty o2Facu

3F

Children rfrom the stan

affic poses comarticipants, anchildren. Child

injuries. Chfrom adults.

What helps tnt? How do

o address thehow fast the cage) react to heights. The that there wme for traffic best perceive at 1.9 m. The of ergonomicte height of traf: Ergonomic de

DUCTION n times, it’s affic signs, ande world beforenot always ex nowadays. In been in use si

raffic signs pro and warningnd placed to as

ANCE OF TRAF

rifunović1, Sv

of Transport aulty of MechaFaculty of Civ

represent a ndpoint of traf

mplex and high nd among themdren have a hhildren experHow do child

them to linkchildren im

ese questionschildren (betwe

traffic signsanalysis of

were differencsigns of diffea traffic sign

he research hc principles in ffic signs for ch

design, Traffic s

hard to imagd it’s even moe there was a nxist because tra

one form or anince the time o

ovide importantgs on the rossist drivers an

ERGONOMFFIC SIGN

etlana Čičevi

and Traffic Enanical Engineevil Engineerin

a.trifunov

vulnerable affic safety. A

requirements m, particularly higher risk of rience traffic dren view the k with their agine traffic

s, this study een 6 and 10 mounted at

f the results ces in mean ferent heights.n when it is

highlights the choosing the

hildren. signs,

gine a world re difficult to

need for them. affic was not nother, traffic of the Roman t information, ad; they are

nd pedestrians

MIC PRINNS FOR CH

ić1, Aleksanda

ngineering, Uering, Univer

ng, Universityvic@sf.bg.ac.r

[6]. Desunderstoin the saalso shoby drivindicatesigns is Ben-Basdifferenexplainedesign comply physicalstandardunderstoprinciplsignificaanswerspropose10, 11].importanall partiof the csigns differenobservesearch spite of these dithey archildren

NCIPLES INHILDREN

ar Zunjic2, M

niversity of Brsity of Belgray of Belgrade,rs

spite their impood correctly [ame way nor eown that signs

vers and pedese that the comp

very low, andssat and Shi

nces in compred by the signprinciples [3]with three b

l and dization, and faood than signs es [6]. Symboantly affected s and reaction ted various chan Besides, the snt role in the pcipants in traffcritical compoof highways

nces in the pd in a great va

and rf the great numifferences are re an indicaton's information

N DESIGN

Magdalena Dra

Belgrade, Serbade, Serbia , Serbia

portance, they[7] and they aequally fast. Ms are often wrstrians [1, 6].

prehension leved some are miinar (2006) rehension of s’ compliance . They found basic ergonom

conceptual amiliarity – arethat do not co

ols and colors both the cor

time [8, 4]. Mnges to the traspeed of the reperceptual jud

ffic situations aonents in the ds and streetprocessing spariety of tasks response smber of researc

still rarely reor of the neu

processing sys

OF THE

agović3

bia

y are not alwaare not perceivany studies harongly perceiv Some findinel of some traffiisinterpreted [6tested if thesigns could with ergonom

that signs thmic principles

compatibilite generally bettomply with the

on traffic sigrrectness of tany studies haaffic signs [2, esponse plays gments made b

and thus it is odesign of traffts. Age-relat

peed have beinvolving visu

selection. ches in this areeported althouural maturity stem.

ays ved ave ved ngs ffic 6]. ese be

mic hat

– ty, ter ese gns the ave

9, an by ne

ffic ted een ual In

ea, gh of

96

For the abexamine htraffic sign 2. METHO2.1. ParticiEducationaenvironmeneducation pexperiment29 (48.3%)this study, signs (TS)Traffic signand 2.2m (signs in tsimplicity, the manusupper TS, between 6-response bstimulus - terminated tested unde 2.2. Data AStatistical statistical s22. Normaof histograthe Kolmoresults do distributionand ANOVundertakenwere carrecommendManual" [5(α) is set at 3. RESULThe rest ochildren’s traffic signThe analysdifferencesdifferent hshowed the(0.259 s), tslowest reaThe seriesshow statisfor the low

bove reasons, tow children re

ns.

ODOLOGY ipants and Expal institutionsnts providingprograms weret. Of the total ) were femalessimple RTs to

) of differentns were placed(2.2m is lawfuthe populated these three TS

script be denorespectively. T-10 years) wer

button immediacertain trafficthe clock c

er all three diff

Analyses analysis wa

software packaality distributioms and the Ko

ogorov-Smirnonot significan

n, the decision VA. Dunnett’s n for additionrried out odations from th5]. The threshot 5%.

TS AND DISCof the paper p

reaction timens. sis of the resuls in mean reactheights (Figure shortest reactthen for the Laction time was of performestically signific

wer TS and RT

the aim of thieact to differe

periment Proces from rural g state-fundee chosen as venumber of 60

s and 31 maleo presented tat heights werd at 3 heights

ully defined heplace). For

S heights will, oted as lower,The subjects (cre instructed tately he/she rec sign, the resounter. All s

ferent condition

as performedage IBM SPSSon was tested bolmogorov-Smv test has det

ntly deviate frwas to use StuT3 Post Hoc

nal comparisonon the bashe textbook "Sold of statistica

CUSSION presents the res for differen

lts indicated thtion time for trre 1). Generation time for thower TS (0.26

as for the Upped paired Stud

cant differencefor the middle

is paper is to ent heights of

edure and urban

ed preschool enues for this 0 respondents, es (51.7%). In argets - traffic re measured. - 1.6m, 1.9m ight of traffic the sake of in the rest of

, middle and children aged o depress the ecognized the sponse button subjects were ns.

d using the S Statistics v. by inspection

mirnov test. As termined that om a normal udent’s T-test test has been ns. All tests sis of the SPSS Survival al significance

results of the nt heights of

hat there were raffic signs of ally, children he Middle TS 68), while the er TS (0.336). dent’s T-testss between RT

e TS (t=7.291;

p

differencesaccording tMiddle TS12.928; p react fasterthree heigh

Figure 3. Utimes for d 4. CONCLBased on research, so- Children mounted amiddle heifor Upper T- There differencesthe traffic s- Childrenchildren frothe traffic sTaking intobest perceim. Hence recommendsigns need by the ruleshould berecognitionparticipantsto incorposigns to ensFuture ressigns, as w

s for the to area: Lower (t = 8.187; p == 0.001). Chi

r than childrenhts of the traffic

Urban-rural diifferent height

LUSIONS the data colle

ome general coshowed the sh

at 1.9 m (0.25ght (0.268), anTS (0.336); are statistical

s in children’s signs;

n from the urbom the rural asigns. o account the ve a traffic sig

follows the dation that, at to be placed ats (2.2 m). Ergo

e involved tn and furths. It can be co

orate ergonomsure driver andearch should

well as more age

children’s rer TS (t = 9.762= 0.006) and Uildren from th

n from the rurac signal.

ifferences in ms of traffic sign

ected and anaonclusions can hortest reaction59 s), then fond the slowest

lly significantRT for all thr

ban area reacarea, for all thr

above mentiogn when it is m

conclusion aleast in schoolt lower heightsonomic principto improve her behavior oncluded that itics in the de

d road safety. include all ty

e groups of res

eaction time2; p = 0.003), Upper TS (t = he urban area al area, for all

mean reaction ns.

alyzed in thisbe derived:

n time for TS or TS at the t reaction was

t age-related ree heights of

ct faster than ree heights of

oned, children mounted at 1.9 and practical l areas, traffic s than defined ples of design traffic signs

of traffic t is important

esign of road

ypes of road spondents.

AcknowThis stEducatioof Serbi REFER[1]Role oundersta& preven[2]streets tothe effdevelopmTranspor[3]Ergonomsign com[4]Interactilabels: dcomplian[5]McGraw[6]Comprehtext disppsycholo[7]Comprehtext disppsycholo[8]&Zakowcompreh46(15), 1[9](2017). children56-64. [10]Mitrović(touchsceducatiosymbolsErgonom[11]B. (2017knowledAcciden[12]developmevaluatioApplied

wledgements tudy was supon, Science ania (projects 360

RENCES Al-Madani, H

of drivers’ anding traffic sntion, 34(2), 18

Appleyard, B.o schoolchildrefects of trafment of spart & Health, 5,

Ben-Bassat, mic guidelines mprehension. Hu

Braun, C. Cion of signal differences in pence. Ergonomic

Pallant, J. (2w-Hill Education

Shinar, D., hension of trafplays. Transpoogy and behavio

Shinar, D., hension of trafplays. Transpoogy and behavio

Shinar, D., wska, L. (20hension: a cro1549-1565.

Siu, K. W. MChildren's ch

's safety sign d

Trifunović, Ać, S., Dragovićcreen devices) on: testing spatis on traffic mics and Safety

Trifunović, A7). The import

dge of traffic sint Analysis & Pr

Waterson, Pment of guidon of warninergonomics, 45

pported by Tnd Technologic027, 36022 and

H., & Al-Janahpersonal ch

sign symbols. A85-196. . (2017). The men: An image mffic on childatial knowledg27-41. T., & Shinfor traffic signuman factors, 4

C., & Silver, word and colerceived hazardcs, 38(11), 22072013). SPSS n (UK).

&Vogelzangffic signs with ortation researcour, 18, 72-82.

&Vogelzangffic signs with ortation researcour, 18, 72-82. Dewar, R. E.003). Traffic

oss-cultural stu

M., Lam, M. S.,hoice: Color

design. Applied

A., Čičević, S., M. (2018). Cand PCs in prial relationshipsigns. IETI

y, 2, 35-41. ., Pešić, D., Čičtance of spatiaigns for childrerevention, 102,

P., & Monk, delines for t

ng signs for 5(5), 1353-1361

The Ministry cal Developmed 36006).

hi, A. R. (2002haracteristics Accident analy

meaning of livabmapping study dren's cognitige. Journal

nar, D. (2006n design increa48(1), 182-195.

N. C. (1995lour on warnid and behaviour7-2220. survival manu

g, M. (2013symbolic vers

ch part F: traf

g, M. (2013symbolic vers

ch part F: traf

., Summala, H sign symb

udy. Ergonomic

, & Wong, Y. associations

d ergonomics, 5

., Lazarević, DComparing tablereschool childrep using geometrTransactions

čević, S., &Antal orientation aen's traffic safe81-92. A. (2014). T

the design ayoung childre

1.

of ent

2). in

sis

ble of

ive of

6). ase

5). ing ral

ual.

3). sus ffic

3). sus ffic

H., bol cs,

L. in

59,

D., ets en' ric on

tić, and ty.

The and en.

98