Individual differences and assessment in the early childhood setting © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain...

11
Individual differences and assessment in the early childhood setting © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013

Transcript of Individual differences and assessment in the early childhood setting © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain...

Page 1: Individual differences and assessment in the early childhood setting © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013.

Individual differences and

assessment in the early childhood

setting

© McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013

Page 2: Individual differences and assessment in the early childhood setting © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013.

Exceptionality

• What is the best time for early intervention?

• As soon as, and as quickly as possible

• However, misdiagnosis and unnecessary labelling can have negative consequences

• Diversity demands differentiation

• Exceptional does not mean exclusive

Page 3: Individual differences and assessment in the early childhood setting © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013.

Normalisation

• Scandinavian concept of ‘normalisation’ involves the acceptance of people with disabilities. Citizens are offered the same conditions as are offered to other citizens (Bank Mikkelson 1969; Nirje 1970)

• Normalisation focuses on ‘dignity of risk’ rather than ‘protection’

• Normalisation has been misinterpreted and applied as making people ‘normal’, forcing them to conform to social norms, with normalising measures ‘offered’ or ‘imposed’ (Wolfensberger 1980)

Page 4: Individual differences and assessment in the early childhood setting © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013.

Subjectivity

• Both disabled and gifted individuals are marginalised and negatively misunderstood

• Teachers and communities implicitly share their values and beliefs about what is significant within the curriculum

• Learning stories are an assessment approach that is deliberately subjective and documents values, beliefs and teacher practice as part of pedagogical documentation

Page 5: Individual differences and assessment in the early childhood setting © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013.

Family-professional partnership

• Full and respectful relationships between parents and professionals

• Families recognised for their

• ‘constancy’ in a child’s life

• role as children’s ‘first teachers’

• particular expertise and assessment information

Page 6: Individual differences and assessment in the early childhood setting © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013.

Model of professional practice

Role of professionals

Role of families

Professional-centred Experts, decision makers, knowledge-holders

Reliant and dependent on professionals

Family-allied Responsible for identification, access and implementation

Able to implement intervention

Family-focused Helping, supporting, assisting

Consumers who choose options, need assistance and advice

Family-centred Equal partners; individualised, flexible and responsive, strengthening and supportive; mutually respectful; shared decision-making

Page 7: Individual differences and assessment in the early childhood setting © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013.

Cross-disciplinary collaborative practice

Early intervention support teams could potentially include• Parents• Extended family• Early childhood teacher• Early intervention teacher• Teacher’s aide• Physiotherapist• Occupational therapist• Speech-language therapist/pathologist• Psychologist• Social worker• Other specialists, family or support people

Page 8: Individual differences and assessment in the early childhood setting © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013.

Cultural competence

• Bevan-Brown (2003, p. 1) states that children’s learning is maximised when educational experiences:

• incorporate cultural content

• reflect cultural values, attitudes and practices

• utilise culturally preferred ways of learning

• include culturally appropriate support

Page 9: Individual differences and assessment in the early childhood setting © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013.

Multicultural and Bicultural

• Multicultural respect and cultural competence is especially important as society becomes increasingly culturally diverse

• Bicultural practice and commitment requires particular commitment, and acknowledgement of indigenous Australian Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and New Zealand Māori

Page 10: Individual differences and assessment in the early childhood setting © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013.

Summary of effective approaches to inclusive assessment

Inclusive assessment is most effective when:

• Family-centred

• Cross-disciplinary

• Culturally competent

• Developmentally/chronologically age-appropriate

• Differentiated/adapted

Page 11: Individual differences and assessment in the early childhood setting © McLachlan, Edwards, Margrain & McLean 2013.

Key terms

• Cross-disciplinary collaborative practices – an approach to teaching and learning that involves all people with a role in supporting children’s learning

• Developmentally/chronologically age-appropriate assessment – assessment that is matched to the child’s current level of knowledge, skills and competencies, regardless of chronological age

• Exceptionality – deviating widely from a norm of physical or mental ability

• Family-based practice – approaches to teaching and learning that include families in decision-making about how to support children’s learning

• Inclusive practice – approach to teaching and learning that involves both philosophical commitment and specific inclusive action

• Indigenous and multicultural assessment – approaches to assessment that affirm cultural strengths, acknowledge Indigenous values and are relevant to Indigenous children and their families

• Normalisation – the acceptance of children with disabilities, with their disabilities, offering them the same conditions as are offered to other children