Indiana University East€¦ · benchmarking), between successive years (longitudinal...

Assessments

Confidentiality of Participant’s Results.

(1) Skyfactor may share Participant’s results with other institutions as part of its bench-

marking services provided that Skyfactor shall disguise the identity of Participant when using

Participant’s results for benchmarking by various methods which may include: (1) scrambling

the order of institutions; (2) refraining from labeling institutions; (3) providing comparisons only

within groups of institutions; and (4) refraining from the release of raw data for individual institu-

tions.

(2) Participant may share and utilize Participant’s results in any respect subject to the

following restrictions: Names of comparison institutions, question and factor ranking, question

and factor means, comparison with “Select 6” comparison institutions, Carnegie classification,

“All Institutions” or any other grouping in the study is considered “Restricted Information”. Re-

stricted Information may only be disclosed to: (i) Offices or staff internal to Participant

(including its advisory boards/committees), (ii) external consultants of Participant, to the extent

necessary for the performance of the consultant’s services, and (iii) regional/national/discipline

specific accrediting organizations or legislative review processes, if applicable. Participant

shall inform all such parties of the confidentiality requirements.

SKYFACTOR BENCHWORKS ASSESSMENT TERMS & CONDITIONS

Revised 3/25/2015

We appreciate your interest and participation in the AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment. Rigorous, research-based assessments can unlock the power of assessment results to improve your institution's performance. Our assessments provide targeted,analysis-backed insights to measure your performance and guide your improvement efforts. Skyfactor's Benchworks analysis identifies whereyou should focus your time, money and resources to improve the overall quality of the student experience and help each student thrive.

OUR MISSION

To empower college educators to positively impact student retention, success, learning and satisfaction; toimprove the overall quality of the college student experience.

Since 1994, Skyfactor has been dedicated to improving retention, student success, and the quality of the collegestudent experience. Skyfactor has empowered over 1,500 college and universities to impact student development,learning, retention and satisfaction through the Mapworks® student success and retention platforms, and throughnational benchmarking assessments for accreditation and continuous improvement. Mapwork’s retentioneffectiveness is grounded in theory, research and statistical methods. Benchworks assessment programs arerooted in accreditation and professional standards and in principles of continuous improvements. Skyfactor offersover 60 nationally benchmarked academic and student affairs assessments as well as Mapworks, acomprehensive student success and retention platform. Skyfactor’s Mapworks and Benchworks assessments arethe essential foundation of an effective assessment and student success initiative. To learn more about Skyfactorand our history, please visit http://www.Skyfactor.com/about/history.

IN PARTNERSHIP WITH AACN

In partnership with AACN, Skyfactor has designed sophisticated, user-friendly benchmarking assessments basedon CCNE standards for accreditation. Using these standards, our nursing assessments provide you with the insightyou need to make targeted, meaningful changes backed by hard data.

Commitment to Assessment // Your institution partnered with Skyfactor Benchworks to participate in the AACN/Benchworks UndergraduateNursing Education Exit Assessment. Assessment is a process to collect information to better understand the perceptions of your institution’seffectiveness from the viewpoint of your campus constituents. Assessment information answers important questions such as “How effective isour program?” or “Where should we focus resources to improve?”

Focusing only on your institution’s performance can be limiting; questions such as “Is improvement possible?” are difficult to answer withoutbenchmarking information. Benchmarking, a key feature in this project, provides comparisons between your institution and others (externalbenchmarking), between successive years (longitudinal benchmarking), and between groups (internal benchmarking). Benchmarking allows youto identify comparative strengths and weaknesses.

THE POWER OF ASSESSMENT AND BENCHMARKING

2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission

http://www.Skyfactor.com/about/history

Closing the Assessment Loop // Successful assessment projects combine data collection, analysis, action planning, and implementation ofactions. Unfortunately, most assessment projects end after studying the assessment results without creating and implementing actions forimprovement. We recommend the following steps:

IMPLEMENT ACTION PLAN //Assign a person(s) to each action and hold

them accountable for their area ofresponsibility.

CONDUCT ASSESSMENT // Using a surveyinstrument that reliably measures areasimportant to your profession is a critical

first step.

CREATE ACTION PLAN //Develop an Action Plan for program

improvement based on these results.

ANALYZE INFORMATION //Carefully review the analysis (both written andonline) to understand issues facing yourprogram and where your program should focusits attention.

Skyfactor provides two reporting platforms for your convenience.

Skyfactor Benchworks’ Written Report // Skyfactor Benchworks’ written report is segmented into four major areas:• Confidentiality Statement: (Located on the first page of this written report.) All results are confidential and may be reproduced and

utilized only for continuous improvement purposes on your campus.• Assessment Summary: This section contains supplemental information to assist you in understanding the results such as a glossary of

terms, list of survey questions and factors, description of the statistical analysis used, external benchmarking groups, and survey responserates.

• Executive Summary: Skyfactor recommends you begin your review of the results with this section. All the major components are pulledtogether to give an excellent overview of your institution’s current performance, external benchmarking comparisons, longitudinal trends,and areas on which to focus resources for improvement. Be sure to identify individual factors key to institutional improvement and anypopulations (e.g., gender, race) with specific issues in order to target actions as necessary.

• Individual Factor Analysis: Once key factors are identified, explore them in-depth to better understand their current and pastperformance. In addition, detailed information of the factor’s scaled questions is reported. Actions should be targeted towards scaledquestions which are more tangible and directly actionable.

Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports // If you would like to delve deeper into your assessment information, Skyfactor Bechworks’ OnlineReports provides additional information (e.g., population characteristics) and interactive tools (e.g., filtering and cross-tabs) to enrich yourunderstanding of the results.

Summary // Assessment and benchmarking helps focus your time and financial resources for greatest impact and moves your institution from adebate about what is wrong to a discussion of possible solutions. Closing the assessment loop by creating and implementing improvementactions guarantees forward progress.

THE POWER OF ASSESSMENT AND BENCHMARKING

2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment 2©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission

Assessment Summary

Executive SummaryOverall SatisfactionOverall LearningOverall Program Effectiveness

SATI

SFAC

TION

FACTOR 1 // Quality of Nursing Instruction

FACTOR 2 // Work and Class Size

FACTOR 3 // Course Lecture and Interaction

FACTOR 4 // Facilities and Administration

FACTOR 5 // Classmates

FACTOR 6 // Advisor

LEAR

NING

FACTOR 7 // Professional Values

FACTOR 8 // Core Competencies

FACTOR 9 // Technical Skills

FACTOR 10 // Core Knowledge

FACTOR 11 // Role Development

OVER

ALL

FACTOR 12 // Overall Satisfaction

FACTOR 13 // Overall Learning

FACTOR 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness

MIS

C Non-Factor Questions

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East ©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission

Below is a compilation of terms used in this report.

% Total // Relative size of the respondent population.

All Institution Mean // Mean of the aggregated results of all participating institutions.

Carnegie Class Mean // Mean of the aggregated results of the institutions in your Carnegie Classification. If the number of institutions in theclass is two or fewer, the results will not be reported to protect anonymity.

Categorical Questions // Categorical questions are closed-ended questions that ask the respondent to choose an answer(s) that best representtheir situation. Typical categorical questions are age, gender, and class standing

Contribution // The “contribution to the variance” as explained through the regression analysis. Essentially, this refers to the amount eachpredictor contributes to the overall variance. The larger the contribution, the larger the impact the factor has on the dependent factor.

Factor // A group of statistically-related questions which describe a broad concept more completely than just a single question.

Goal // The goal value, set by Skyfactor, is a value of 5.50 on a 7-point scale or a value of 75% on the performance scale. Different performanceindicators are given based on its relationship with the goal. indicates that the goal was met. indicates the goal is within reach. indicatesthe performance is well below goal.

Mean // The average (the sum of the values divided by the number of respondents) of the item.

Mean Range // The difference between the minimum mean (Min) and maximum mean (Max) across populations provides a range of meanswhich gives a measure of the variation of the data.

N // Number of respondents to that item.

Negative Correlation (NEG) // The relationship between an independent factor and the dependent factor where the factors move in oppositedirections. In other words if the factor’s mean decreases, then we would expect the mean of the overall performance factor to increase.

Non-Factor Questions // Scaled questions that are relevant but not statistically related to a factor. Results of these questions are reportedindividually.

Not a Predictor (NP) // A factor which does not contribute to the variance thus is not a predictor of the dependent variable. Because this factoris not a predictor, changes to its performance will not impact the dependent factor.

Not Reported (NR) // In order to protect participant anonymity, Skyfactor will not report population data when the number in that population isfive or fewer. In order to protect institutional anonymity, Skyfactor will not report performance values for the Carnegie Class if the number ofinstitutions in the class is two or fewer.

Performance // Mean scaled from 0-100%. The translation is: “1” on the 7-point scale equates with 0% performance, “4” equates to 50%performance, and “7” equates to 100% performance.

Predictor // Predictor status of the factor as calculated from the regression analysis. The strongest predictor is labeled as “1st”, the secondstrongest is “2nd”, and so forth. We label factors that do not contribute to the variance as “NP” (non-predictor).

Rank // Sorting the institutions from highest performance to lowest performance, your institution’s rank is determined. Note, your institution’sdata is included when we calculate your institution’s ranking within that comparison group (e.g., your institution’s Select 6 rank is out of 7institutions since your institution is included in the rank).

Response Rate // The number of participants who completed the assessment divided by the total number of participants attempted to survey.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment Survey Summary // 4©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission

Scaled Questions // These survey questions rely on a 1-to-7 Likert scale with "1" indicating either strong disagreement or being verydissatisfied and "7" indicating either strong agreement or being very satisfied. This type of question is designed to gather perceptions of theparticipants across a variety of content areas.

Select 6 Mean // Mean of the aggregated results of the Select 6 institutions.

Standard Deviation // The measure of the variation in response values within that item. Small standard deviations indicate consistency amongrespondents. In these cases, any intervention taken can be the same for all populations since respondents are responding similarly. Largestandard deviations indicate wide variability among respondents. A deeper understanding of which populations are creating this variability isnecessary before an intervention can begin. May be abbreviated as Std Dev in reporting.

Statistical Significance (Stat Sig) // The indication of a statistical difference in means. Statistical testing is conducted between yourinstitution’s current results and the results from previous years to determine if differences in the means are statistically significant. indicateswhere your institution performed statistically higher; indicates no statistical difference; and indicates where your institution performedstatistically lower. Statistical testing is also conducted between populations and between other institutions when applicable.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS


There are three types of questions used in this assessment: Categorical Questions, Scaled Questions, and Open-Ended Questions. Below is a fulllisting of the survey items grouped by question type.

Categorical Questions // Categorical questions are closed-ended questions that ask the respondent to choose an answer(s) that best representstheir situation. Typical categorical questions are GPA, Class Standing, and Place of Residence. Below are the categorical questions asked in thisassessment. In this written report, Skyfactor has chosen to report detailed information on a few key items marked with an asterisk; reporting byall categorical questions can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.

D001 // What type of BSN did you complete at this institution?D002 // What is your gender? *D003 // How old are you?D004 // What is your ethnicity?MR005 // What is your race? (Choose all that apply.)D006 // Race/Ethnicity (reporting only) *D007 // Are you an international student (Non-Resident Alien)?D008 // Did either of your parents/guardians graduate from college?D009 // How many years of full-time health related work experience did you have prior to entering this program? *D010 // Did you complete the majority of this program as a full-time or part-time student?D011 // What was your SAT Math+Verbal or ACT Composite score? (highest score if you took multiple tests) *D012 // What is your cumulative GPA? *D013 // In an average week, how many hours do you spend working (in a paid job and/or work-study)?D014 // In an average week, how many hours do you spend studying/out-of-class school work (e.g., homework, lab time)?D015 // Do you plan to pursue additional education?D016 // What are your immediate plans for employment upon graduation from this institution?D017 // Percentage of instructors in your clinical nursing courses you rate as excellentD018 // Percentage of instructors in your clinical nursing courses you rate as poorD019 // Percentage of instructors in your classroom nursing courses you rate as excellentD020 // Percentage of instructors in your classroom nursing courses you rate as poor:D021 // Which best describes your current stage in the employment search process?D023 // How far away from this institution are you seeking employment?D024 // Which best describes the kind of organization where you plan to work?D025 // What is the total amount of loans taken to finance this degree?D026 // From the time of your graduation, how long do you anticipate it will take to pay off your students loans?D029 // Do you plan to pursue additional education?D030 // Which best describes your current stage in the application process?D094 // Which best describes how you took classes while completing this degree?

Scaled Questions // These survey questions rely on a 1-to-7 Likert scale with “1” indicating either strong disagreement or being Extremely and“7” indicating either strong agreement or being Not at all. These questions are designed to gather perceptions of the participants across a varietyof content areas. The scaled questions from the survey are listed below.

To what degree:Q027 // Are you experiencing stress regarding paying off your student loansQ028 // Do you anticipate problems making your student loan payments

Rate the quality of the BSN program regarding:Q032 // Teaching in your clinical coursesQ033 // Teaching in your classroom coursesQ034 // Feedback on assignments (other than grades) you received from instructors in your clinical coursesQ035 // Feedback on assignments (other than grades) you received from instructors in your classroom coursesQ036 // Extent to which your senior clinical experience built on the foundation laid in previous nursing coursesQ037 // Accessibility of faculty outside classQ038 // Faculty responsiveness to student concerns

How satisfied are you with the faculty's ability to:Q039 // Relate concepts to the real worldQ040 // Draw on experience of studentsQ041 // Engage students in discussionsQ042 // Communicate effectivelyQ043 // Effectively sequence content of coursesQ044 // Interact with studentsQ045 // Act as effective role models in clinical practice

How satisfied are you with the:Q046 // Amount of work required of you in your classroom coursesQ047 // Amount of work required of you in your clinical coursesQ048 // Amount of collaboration required in your coursesQ049 // Value you derived from your collaboration experiences

SURVEY ITEMS


Regarding your fellow students how satisfied were you with their:Q050 // Academic abilityQ051 // Ability to work in study groupsQ052 // Level of camaraderieQ053 // Academic integrityQ054 // Amount of work experienceQ055 // Quality of work experience

Regarding the school of nursing, how satisfied are you with the:Q056 // Medical computer technologyQ057 // Training to use medical computer technologyQ058 // Responsiveness of the program administration to student concernsQ059 // Tuition/fee level of the programQ060 // Program course scheduleQ061 // Career placementQ062 // Financial aid

To what degree was your academic advisor knowledgeable about:Q063 // Course requirements for majorQ064 // Degree requirementsQ065 // Campus resources for personal, academic, or financial problems

To what degree did your non-nursing courses enhance your ability to:Q066 // Integrate theories and concepts from liberal education into nursing practice.Q067 // Value the ideal of lifelong learning to support excellence in nursing practice.

To what degree did the nursing program teach you to:Q068 // Understand how health care delivery systems are organizedQ069 // Apply research based knowledge as a basis for practiceQ070 // Integrate theory to develop a foundation for practiceQ071 // Make effective presentationsQ072 // Use appropriate technologies to assess patientsQ073 // Understand the effects of health policies on diverse populationsQ074 // Understand the global health care environmentQ075 // Incorporate knowledge of cost factors when delivering careQ076 // Communicate with healthcare professionals to deliver high quality patient careQ077 // Work with inter-professional teamsQ078 // Assess predictive factors that influence the health of patientsQ079 // Provide culturally competent careQ080 // Support fairness in the delivery of careQ081 // Assist patients to interpret the meaning of health informationQ082 // Act as an advocate for vulnerable patientsQ083 // Demonstrate accountability for your own actionsQ084 // Honor the right of patients to make decisions about their health careQ085 // Incorporate nursing standards into practiceQ086 // Apply an ethical decision-making framework to clinical situationsQ087 // Provide physical support in preparation for therapeutic proceduresQ088 // Provide emotional support in preparation for therapeutic proceduresQ089 // Provide pain reduction measuresQ090 // Manage woundsQ091 // Evaluate individual's ability to assume responsibility for self careQ092 // Assist patients to achieve a peaceful end of lifeQ093 // Delegate nursing care while retaining accountability

To what degree did the online course/technology provide:Q095 // Easy-to-use softwareQ096 // Software that was functionalQ097 // Interaction between you and your instructorQ098 // Interaction among classmates

Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree:Q100 // Would you recommend the nursing school to a close friend?Q101 // Did the nursing school provide a positive academic experience?Q102 // Were you challenged to do your best academic work?Q103 // Were you motivated to do your best academic work?Q104 // Was the information you learned applicable to your future career?Q105 // Comparing the expense to the quality of your education, rate the value of the investment made in your degree.

SURVEY ITEMS


Open-End Questions // Open-ended questions are designed to encourage a full, meaningful answer from the respondent. Typical open-endedquestions are “How can we improve this program?” Below are the open-ended questions asked on this survey; please access SkyfactorBenchworks' Online Reports to read or download respondents’ answers.

LA022 // If you have accepted a position, please tell us the organization name and the programLA031 // If you have decided where you'll be studying, please tell us the institution name and the program:LA099 // Please tell us how we can improve your online educational experienceLA106 // What did you like best about the nursing program?LA107 // How can we improve the nursing program for future students?LA108 // Which person(s) in the nursing program contributed most to your success?LA109 // Please provide any additional comments regarding your degree program.

SURVEY ITEMS


Factors, also called constructs, are groupings of related scaled questions. Skyfactor utilizes factors for two important reasons:• Reduces complexity: The number of questions in this assessment is large making analysis based solely on survey questions complex

and unwieldy. The number of factors is significantly smaller, bundling the details and reducing the complexity of analysis;• Strengthen regression: The focal point of Skyfactor’s analysis, Recommendations for Improvement (based on a multi-variant linear

regression), is weakened if too many variables are used. Factors, a significantly shorter set of variables, strengthen the regressionanalysis.

Factor Analysis // Factor analysis is a statistical technique used to derive factors. The basic assumption of factor analysis is that underlyingdimensions, or factors, can be used to explain more complex phenomena. In measuring perceptions, the object is to combine several questionsthat, in concert, capture the notion for a particular topic, such as “Facilities”.

Factor Reliability // Once it has been determined that a set of scaled questions do share a relationship and therefore constitute a factor, there isan additional (and necessary) statistical test to assess the psychometric soundness of the factor. We rely on Cronbach’s Alpha to determine theinternal consistency or reliability of any factor. A Cronbach’s alpha of zero would mean that there is no internal consistency at all, i.e., subjectsare likely to respond with any value on any of the questions in a factor with no discernible pattern. An alpha of 1 would mean that every subjectanswered every question comprising the factor consistently. This is a highly unlikely event. An alpha of .5 is considered acceptable; an alpha of.7 good; alphas in the .8 to .9 range are exceptional.

Below is a list of this assessment’s factors and the corresponding Reliability (Chronbach’s Alpha).

FACTOR NAME QUESTION NUMBERS RELIABILITY

FACTOR 1 // Satisfaction // Quality of Nursing Instruction 32-35, 37-38 0.91

FACTOR 2 // Satisfaction // Work and Class Size 46-49 0.88

FACTOR 3 // Satisfaction // Course Lecture and Interaction 39-45 0.95

FACTOR 4 // Satisfaction // Facilities and Administration 56-62 0.88

FACTOR 5 // Satisfaction // Classmates 50-53 0.88

FACTOR 6 // Satisfaction // Advisor 63-65 0.93

FACTOR 7 // Learning // Professional Values 79-80, 82-84 0.94

FACTOR 8 // Learning // Core Competencies 69, 71, 81, 91 0.88

FACTOR 9 // Learning // Technical Skills 87-90 0.90

FACTOR 10 // Learning // Core Knowledge 68, 72-78, 86, 92 0.95

FACTOR 11 // Learning // Role Development 66-67, 70, 85 0.82

FACTOR 12 // Satisfaction // Overall Satisfaction 100-101 0.94

FACTOR 13 // Learning // Overall Learning 102-104 0.88

FACTOR 14 // Overall // Overall Program Effectiveness 100-105 0.93

Non-Factor Questions 27-28, 36, 93, 95-98 n/a

FACTORS


Skyfactor is dedicated to providing relevant statistical analysis which removes the guesswork from the reader. Making decisions on assessmentinformation without fully understanding if the results are statistical, could lead to decisions with unintended consequences. In this report, weprovide results from regression analysis and statistical testing of means.

Regression Analysis (Identifying Predictors) // A correlation establishes the relationship between two variables. Regression analysis, bycontrast, allows us to determine the relationship between an assment’s dependent factor (in this assessment, Overall Program Effectiveness) andmultiple independent factors (e.g., facilities, environment, etc.). If we suspect, for example, that Overall Program Effectiveness is related to a setof independent factors, we could simultaneously assess the extent to which all of these independent factors predict Overall ProgramEffectiveness. Beyond that, we can determine the exact weights for each of the independent factors, which allows us to identify which of theindependent factors is most important, which is second, and so forth. We can further determine how much each independent factor increasesour ability to predict Overall Program Effectiveness.

The first step in regression analysis is to identify which of the independent factors is the best predictor of Overall Program Effectiveness. Next,the analysis takes into account (controls for) the effect of the first predictor and then determines the second best predictor. This is an iterativeprocess, which controls for all prior factors, then identifies the next predictor (e.g., the 3rd most important, 4th most important and so on).

Examining the output of this process allows us to identify the most important predictors among the dependent factors, those with more modestexplanatory power, and finally those factors that contribute nothing to our understanding of the Overall Program Effectiveness.

We should note that while the factors in this latter category have no explanatory power, in a practical sense, they contribute greatly to ourdecision-making ability. Knowing what is not related to -- or predictive of -- Overall Program Effectiveness can be a valuable insight. Presumably,one would not allocate scarce resources to improve elements that are not related to Overall Program Effectiveness. Conversely, if we know thebest predictors of Overall Program Effectiveness, investment in those elements would pay high dividends.

In reporting results of regression analysis, we discuss the “contribution to the variance”. Essentially, this refers to how well we can explain acertain outcome (improving Overall Program Effectiveness) by using the factors. The higher the contribution, the stronger our conclusions abouthow well the factors we have identified help us understand what predicts a given outcome (in this case, improving Overall ProgramEffectiveness).

Statistical Testing of Means (T-Test) // The t-test determines whether the means of two data sets are statistically different from each other.The result of the t-test is a p-value that indicates how likely those results could happen by chance. A difference is identified as “significant” if theprobability that the result could have occurred merely due to chance is less than 5%. All differences reported are significant at the p < 0.05levels or better. Many are significant at the p < 0.01 (less than 1% of the results could have occurred due to chance) or p < 0.001 (less than0.1% of the results could have occurred due to chance) level.

Statistical testing is conducted between your institution’s results and the aggregate of your external benchmarking institutions (Select 6institutions, Carnegie Class institutions, and all participating institutions). We also conduct statistical testing between populations and betweensubsequent years. In this report, we indicate if the test was statistical to p < 0.05 but do not provide individual p-values; p-values can be foundin Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reporting.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS


Benchmarking is the process of comparing your institution's performance against other institutions. National benchmarking assessments allowstandards to be set and, through those standards, your institution can calibrate its effectiveness. Throughout this report (and Skyfactor's OnlineReporting), you will find comparisons of your institution's results against those of your external benchmarking institutions (Select 6 institutions,Carnegie Class institutions, and all participating institutions). As you review these results, note the areas where your institution’s outperformsyour external benchmarks; these are areas to celebrate! The opposite may also be true; you may find areas where your institution underperformsyour external benchmarks. This indicates that others may have a better approach or better implementation and improvement is possible.

Select 6 Institutions // A very important aspect of this benchmarking assessment is the comparison of your institution's results against four tosix peer or aspirant institutions (regardless of the number of institutions selected, Skyfactor refers to this group as "Select 6"). In this report, weprovide the aggregated information from these institutions. If you want to view an individual Select 6 institutional performance, please accessSkyfactor Benchworks' Online Reports; however to protect anonymity, institutional names are not linked to results. Your Select 6 institutions are:

NOTE: Your institution was allowed to choose from institutions who participated in 2013, 2014 or 2015; the data collection year is noted besidethe institutions name.

YOUR SELECT 6 INSTITUTIONS

Ashland University (2015) Cedarville University (2015)

Lourdes University (2015) Northern Michigan University (2015)

University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire (2015) Urbana University (2015)

Carnegie Classification Institutions // The institutions in your Carnegie Class compose the second external benchmarking group. The CarnegieClassification of Institutions of Higher Education is a framework for classifying, or grouping, colleges and universities in the United States. Theprimary purpose of the framework is for educational research and analysis, where it is often important to identify groups of roughly comparableinstitutions. The classification includes all accredited, degree-granting colleges and universities in the United States that are represented in theNational Center for Education Statistics Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). For this assessment, Skyfactor used the 2010Basic Carnegie Classifications to determine your institution’s classification. All institutions outside the United States are combined into an“International” Carnegie Class. For a complete list of the institutions in your Carnegie Class, please refer to Skyfactor Benchworks' OnlineReports.

YOUR CARNEGIE CLASSIFICATION

Baccalaureate Colleges--Diverse Fields

Includes institutions where baccalaureate degrees represent at least 10 percent of all undergraduate degrees and where fewer than 50master's degrees or 20 doctoral degrees were awarded during the update year. (Some institutions above the master's degree threshold arealso included) Excludes Special Focus Institutions and Tribal Colleges.

There are 24 institutions in this comparative group.

All Institutions // The third external benchmark is the combination of all participating institutions. This provides a national norm or nationalstandard. For a complete list of all participating institutions, please access Skyfactor Benchworks' Online Reports.

There are 273 institutions in this comparative group.

EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING

2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Survey Summary // 11©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission

Survey response rate (also known as completion rate or return rate) refers to the percentage of the surveyed population who responded to thesurvey. It is calculated by dividing the number of survey participants by the number of people in the sample. For example: if 1,000 surveys wereattempted and 257 were completed, then the response rate would be 25.7%. Below are the response rates for your institution and your externalbenchmarking institutions. We have also included response rates by a few key categorical/demographic questions. Response rates for all othercategorical/demographic questions can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks' Online Reports.

SURVEY RESPONSE RATE PERFORMANCE

# ATTEMPTED # RESPRESPONSE

RATE

Your Institution 98 60 61.2%

Select 6 547 445 81.4%

Carnegie Class 1,256 905 72.1%

All Institutions 52,933 27,870 52.7%

0 ------ RESPONSE RATE ------ 100%

WHAT IS YOUR GENDER?

# RESP % TOTAL

Female 52 86.7%

Male 8 13.3%

Transgender 0 0%

Other 0 0%

0 ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 100%

RACE/ETHNICITY (REPORTING ONLY)

# RESP % TOTAL

White 57 95%

Hispanic (regardless of race) 1 1.7%

American Indian/Alaska Native/First Nation 1 1.7%

Black or African American 1 1.7%

Asian 0 0%

Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 0 0%

Two or more races 0 0%

Race and ethnicity unknown 0 0%

0 ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 100%

SURVEY RESPONSE RATES


HOW MANY YEARS OF FULL-TIME HEALTH RELATED WORK EXPERIENCE DID YOU HAVE PRIOR TO ENTERING THIS PROGRAM?

# RESP % TOTAL

No health related work experience 29 48.3%

More than 5 years 12 20%

1 to up to 3 years 11 18.3%

Less than 1 year1 4 6.7%

3 to 5 years 4 6.7%

0 ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 100%

WHAT IS YOUR CUMULATIVE GPA?

# RESP % TOTAL

3.50 or above 31 52.5%

3.00-3.49 22 37.3%

2.50-2.99 4 6.8%

2.00-2.49 2 3.4%

Below 2.00 0 0%

Don't know 0 0%

0 ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 100%

WHAT WAS YOUR SAT MATH+VERBAL OR ACT COMPOSITE SCORE? (HIGHEST SCORE IF YOU TOOK MULTIPLE TESTS)

# RESP % TOTAL

Didn't take or don't remember 35 59.3%

SAT 1081-1240/ACT 24-27 9 15.3%

SAT 1241/ACT 28 or above 7 11.9%

SAT 931-1080/ACT 20-23 5 8.5%

SAT 930/ACT 19 or below 3 5.1%

0 ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 100%

SURVEY RESPONSE RATES


This assessment allows for a high degree of customization to suit your institutional needs.

Unit-Levels // Your institution had the option of coding their surveys by Unit-Level, which provides analysis at this level of detail. From thisanalysis, you can immediately identify the areas that are top performing and those that are lower performing which drives the development ofinternal “best practices”. This analysis can be found within each factor section later in this report. A more detailed analysis can be found inSkyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.

Degree Program 3 coded

Institution Specific Questions (ISQs) // Many institutions choose to take advantage of the opportunity to add “institution specific” questions tothe survey. If your institution added questions, a detailed analysis of those questions can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.

ASSESSMENT CUSTOMIZATION


To help your institution better understand its current performance and potential areas of improvement, Skyfactor reports results by MajorIndicators of Performance (current performance of these indicators is listed below). This allows you to examine each indicator separately toidentify areas in need of improvement. Subsequent reports in the Executive Summary provide detailed information for each indicator includingrecommendations for improvement, external benchmarking, and longitudinal trends. From the analysis, you may identify one or more factors inneed of improvement. For more detailed information on that factor(s), please reference the appropriate section (tabs are labeled by factornumbers). In addition, please reference Skyfactor Benchworks' Online Reports which provides more detailed reporting.

Satisfaction // This indicator is a collection of factors that measures satisfaction on areas such as services, programming, or facilities. Thedependent variable, within this indicator, is Overall Satisfaction. It acts as a proxy for the indicator and is composed of questions such as “Towhat degree did your on-campus housing experience fulfill your expectations?” It is important to understand the factors that drive satisfactionbecause a positive living environment can improve student learning.

INDICATOR PERFORMANCE

SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL

INST. N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE

Factor 12 // Overall Satisfaction 57 4.87 1.62 64.5%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

Learning // This indicator is a collection of factors (e.g., Peer Interactions and Personal Growth) that measures student learning outcomesresulting from the residence hall experience. The dependent variable, within this indicator, is Overall Learning. It acts as a proxy for the indicatorand is composed of questions such as “To what degree has living in on-campus housing enhanced your learning experience?” It is important tounderstand the degree to which the residence hall experience impacts overall learning in order to improve the college experience. In addition, byimproving the factors that drive learning, student learning improves.


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Factor 13 // Overall Learning 57 5.77 1.12 79.5%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

Overall // This indicator, a combination of Satisfaction and Learning, provides a measure of the overall experience of the resident. The dependentvariable, Overall Program Effectiveness, acts as the proxy for the indicator and is composed of questions from the dependent variables inSatisfaction and Learning. Ultimately, the residence hall experience is a balance between customer satisfaction and student learning, thusunderstanding the predictors of Overall Program Effectiveness allows allocation of resources to the area(s) that will most benefit the resident.


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Factor 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness 57 5.37 1.19 72.8%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

MAJOR INDICATORS OF PERFORMANCE

Issue Needs Work Good NR Not Reported Lower Equal Higher0%-70% 71%-74% 75%-100% NEG Negative Correlation

2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission

SUMMARY CURRENT PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING RECOMMENDATIONS LONGITUDINAL TRENDS

In this series of reports, you will find a summary of the indicator, Satisfaction. This summary includes current performance, externalbenchmarking, recommendations for improvement, and longitudinal trends. Together these analyses create a picture of your institution'sperformance and provide guidance for future improvement efforts. If you need to better understand the behavior of a factor, please reference itssection (tabs are labeled by factor numbers). Also, please reference Skyfactor Benchworks' Online Reports for additional reporting.

Summary // The analyses below allow you to monitor the overall performance of the indicator, Satisfaction. Included are the currentperformance of the indicator’s dependent variable, Overall Satisfaction, your institutional strength and weakness (the highest and lowestperformance factor within this indicator), peer comparison (the factors where your institution performs best and worst against your Select 6), andthe longitudinal trend of Overall Satisfaction. In subsequent indicator reports, we provide in-depth information in each of these areas.


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL



0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES // YOUR INSTITUTION

SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Factor 6 // Advisor 59 5.64 1.40 77.3%

Factor 4 // Facilities and Administration 59 4.44 1.19 57.3%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES // COMPARISON WITH SELECT 6

SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL



Factor 5 // Classmates 59 5.20 1.20 70.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

LONGITUDINAL TREND // OVERALL SATISFACTION

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 75.0% 68.4% 76.8% 47.5% 64.5%

Mean 5.50 5.11 5.61 3.85 4.87

INDICATOR // SATISFACTION


2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Executive Summary // 2©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission


There are many pieces of analysis that, when combined, create a comprehensive picture of your institution’s performance. The first analysis toexamine is the current performance. This information, coupled with understanding of individual population perceptions, external benchmarks,longitudinal trends, recommendations for improvement, and other institutional information or assessment is invaluable to constructing aneffective Action Plan for improvement.

Current Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Overall Satisfaction. This factor would be difficult to improve directly, but improving itspredictors should result in its improvement. Be sure to review the Recommendations section, within the indicatior, before creating yourimprovement plan.


N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

Below is the current performance of the factors associated with the Satisfaction indicator. Please review all of the information in this sectionbefore creating your program’s Action Plan to improve Overall Satisfaction. It is natural to want to improve the lowest performing factors, but becareful! Improving the lowest performing factor may not improve Overall Satisfaction if it is not a predictor. Finish reviewing all analysis beforedeveloping your improvement plan.

INDICATOR FACTORS BY PERFORMANCE


Factor 6 // Advisor 59 5.64 1.40 77.3%

Factor 3 // Course Lecture and Interaction 59 5.56 1.01 76.0%


Factor 2 // Work and Class Size 59 5.08 1.08 68.0%

Factor 1 // Quality of Nursing Instruction 59 4.87 1.15 64.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%





Current Performance // Key PopulationsSkyfactor continues to analyze the current performance of Overall Satisfaction by investigating how key subpopulations rate your institution’sperformance. Key categorical questions have been selected and are reported on below. Answer options within each categorical question havebeen divided into two groups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which is statistically higher thanthe other population, a designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populations have statistically equalfactor means. Relative population size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. Analysis for other subpopulations can befound in Skyfactor’s Online Reporting.


N % TOTALSTATSIG N MEAN

STDDEV PERFORMANCE

Female 50 4.92 1.68 65.3%

52 86.7% Male 7 4.50 1.07 58.3%

8 13.3% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%



STDDEV PERFORMANCE

White 55 4.84 1.63 64.0%

57 95% All others N/A 2 NR NR NR NR

3 5% 100% ---------- % TOTAL ---------- 0 0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%



STDDEV PERFORMANCE

One or more years of work experience 25 5.26 1.40 71.0%

27 45% Less than one year of work experience 32 4.56 1.71 59.3%




STDDEV PERFORMANCE

3.00 GPA and higher 50 4.99 1.49 66.5%

53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 3.58 2.03 43.0%







STDDEV PERFORMANCE

SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 4.68 1.64 61.3%

17 70.8% SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 6 4.50 1.32 58.3%






The second piece of the analysis picture is External Benchmarking. Throughout this report and in Skyfactor’s Online Reporting, Benchworkscompares your institutional data to the aggregate of your external benchmarking groups. If your Action Plan for institutional improvementincludes improving Overall Satisfaction and if your program is performing below any of these external benchmarking groups, this information canbe used to convince staff that higher performance is possible. If your institutional performance is higher than any of these groups, use this tocelebrate!

Below is a comparison of your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for the indicator’s dependentvariable, Overall Satisfaction, and the other factors associated with this indicator. A designates factors where your institution performsstatistically higher than that external benchmarking group; a designates factors where your program is statistically lower in performance; anda represents factors that are statistically equal with that external benchmarking group. The chart represents your institution’s performance oneach factor.


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL



0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Factor 6 // Advisor 59 5.64 1.40 77.3%






0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%





Arguably the most important piece of the analysis is Recommendations for Improvement In order to improve Overall Satisfaction, it is necessaryto know which factors have the greatest impact. Improving factors with high impact should lead to an improvement in Overall Satisfaction. Thefirst chart shown below is the current performance for Overall Satisfaction. If this performance is below your desired level, identify the highimpact factors (listed below) and focus your institution’s improvement efforts on those factors.




0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

Skyfactor has grouped the Overall Satisfaction predictors into high and low impact as calculated from a multi-variant linear regression analysis.The strongest predictor is labeled as “1st”, the second strongest is “2nd”, and so forth. We label factors that do not contribute to the variance as“NP” (non-predictor). Skyfactor recommends your program focus its resources to improve the performance of your high impact factors whilemaintaining, but not expending resources to improve, low/no impact factor performance.

HIGH IMPACT FACTORS

PREDICTOR CONTRIBUTION N MEANSTDDEV PERFORMANCE

Factor 1 // Quality of Nursing Instruction 1ST 36.4% 59 4.87 1.15 64.5%

Factor 4 // Facilities and Administration 2ND 26.2% 59 4.44 1.19 57.3%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

LOW/NO IMPACT FACTORS


Factor 6 // Advisor NP 0% 59 5.64 1.40 77.3%

Factor 3 // Course Lecture and Interaction NP 0% 59 5.56 1.01 76.0%

Factor 5 // Classmates NP 0% 59 5.20 1.20 70.0%

Factor 2 // Work and Class Size NP 0% 59 5.08 1.08 68.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%





The final piece of the analysis is Longitudinal Trends which supports continuous improvement. The term “continuous improvement” means anever-ending effort to improve programs and processes through several incremental improvements rather than one overwhelming innovation.The term “continuous assessment” means conducting assessment at regular intervals (Skyfactor recommends annual assessment); continuousassessment informs continuous improvement.

Longitudinal trends analysis, an artifact of continuous assessment, is the key to evaluating your institution’s continuous improvement efforts.Understanding trends is necessary to determine whether the actions conducted resulted in a successful outcome. If your institution’s currentperformance falls short of expectations, review the actions conducted on the top predictors and make adjustments.

Below is the longitudinal trend for the indicator and top predictors for the most recent iterations of this assessment. If your institution did notparticipate continuously during these iterations, Skyfactor extrapolated between successive iterations. A designates years where yourinstitution performs statistically higher than the current year; a designates years where your program is statistically lower in performance; anda represents years that are statistically equal to the current year.

LONGITUDINAL TRENDS

OVERALL INDICATOR PERFORMANCE 1ST PREDICTOR 2ND PREDICTORFactor 12 // Overall Satisfaction Factor 1 // Quality of Nursing Instruction Factor 4 // Facilities and Administration

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 75.0% 68.4% 76.8% 47.5% 64.5%

Mean 5.50 5.11 5.61 3.85 4.87

Performance 71.9% 68.5% 68.4% 54.4% 64.6%

Mean 5.31 5.11 5.11 4.27 4.87

Performance 69.0% 68.1% 67.0% 55.2% 57.4%

Mean 5.14 5.09 5.02 4.31 4.44





In this series of reports, you will find a summary of the indicator, Learning. This summary includes current performance, external benchmarking,recommendations for improvement, and longitudinal trends. Together these analyses create a picture of your institution's performance andprovide guidance for future improvement efforts. If you need to better understand the behavior of a factor, please reference its section (tabs arelabeled by factor numbers). Also, please reference Skyfactor Benchworks' Online Reports for additional reporting.

Summary // The analyses below allow you to monitor the overall performance of the indicator, Learning. Included are the current performance ofthe indicator’s dependent variable, Overall Learning, your institutional strength and weakness (the highest and lowest performance factor withinthis indicator), peer comparison (the factors where your institution performs best and worst against your Select 6), and the longitudinal trend ofOverall Learning. In subsequent indicator reports, we provide in-depth information in each of these areas.


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL



0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Factor 7 // Professional Values 57 5.88 0.96 81.3%

Factor 11 // Role Development 58 5.00 1.05 66.7%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Factor 9 // Technical Skills 56 5.45 1.18 74.2%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

LONGITUDINAL TREND // OVERALL LEARNING

70%

80%

90%

2013 2014 2015

Performance 85.6% 74.1% 79.4%

Mean 6.14 5.44 5.77

INDICATOR // LEARNING





Current Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Overall Learning. This factor would be difficult to improve directly, but improving its predictorsshould result in its improvement. Be sure to review the Recommendations section, within the indicatior, before creating your improvement plan.




0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

Below is the current performance of the factors associated with the Learning indicator. Please review all of the information in this section beforecreating your program’s Action Plan to improve Overall Learning. It is natural to want to improve the lowest performing factors, but be careful!Improving the lowest performing factor may not improve Overall Learning if it is not a predictor. Finish reviewing all analysis before developingyour improvement plan.




Factor 8 // Core Competencies 58 5.47 1.10 74.5%


Factor 10 // Core Knowledge 58 5.45 0.99 74.2%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%





Current Performance // Key PopulationsSkyfactor continues to analyze the current performance of Overall Learning by investigating how key subpopulations rate your institution’sperformance. Key categorical questions have been selected and are reported on below. Answer options within each categorical question havebeen divided into two groups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which is statistically higher thanthe other population, a designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populations have statistically equalfactor means. Relative population size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. Analysis for other subpopulations can befound in Skyfactor’s Online Reporting.



STDDEV PERFORMANCE

Female 50 5.82 1.13 80.3%

52 86.7% Male 7 5.38 0.93 73.0%




STDDEV PERFORMANCE

White 55 5.72 1.11 78.7%





STDDEV PERFORMANCE






STDDEV PERFORMANCE

3.00 GPA and higher 50 5.81 1.11 80.2%

53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 5.17 0.98 69.5%







STDDEV PERFORMANCE

SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.43 1.14 73.8%







The second piece of the analysis picture is External Benchmarking. Throughout this report and in Skyfactor’s Online Reporting, Benchworkscompares your institutional data to the aggregate of your external benchmarking groups. If your Action Plan for institutional improvementincludes improving Overall Learning and if your program is performing below any of these external benchmarking groups, this information can beused to convince staff that higher performance is possible. If your institutional performance is higher than any of these groups, use this tocelebrate!

Below is a comparison of your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for the indicator’s dependentvariable, Overall Learning, and the other factors associated with this indicator. A designates factors where your institution performsstatistically higher than that external benchmarking group; a designates factors where your program is statistically lower in performance; anda represents factors that are statistically equal with that external benchmarking group. The chart represents your institution’s performance oneach factor.


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL



0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL







0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%





Arguably the most important piece of the analysis is Recommendations for Improvement In order to improve Overall Learning, it is necessary toknow which factors have the greatest impact. Improving factors with high impact should lead to an improvement in Overall Learning. The firstchart shown below is the current performance for Overall Learning. If this performance is below your desired level, identify the high impactfactors (listed below) and focus your institution’s improvement efforts on those factors.




0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

Skyfactor has grouped the Overall Learning predictors into high and low impact as calculated from a multi-variant linear regression analysis. Thestrongest predictor is labeled as “1st”, the second strongest is “2nd”, and so forth. We label factors that do not contribute to the variance as“NP” (non-predictor). Skyfactor recommends your program focus its resources to improve the performance of your high impact factors whilemaintaining, but not expending resources to improve, low/no impact factor performance.

Note: Skyfactory Benchworks uses a significance value of p < .05 to calculate predictors. Based on the number of responses and/orthe behavior of those responses, the significance value has been increased to p < 0.11

HIGH IMPACT FACTORS


Factor 8 // Core Competencies 1ST 21.3% 58 5.47 1.10 74.5%

Factor 10 // Core Knowledge 2ND 20.3% 58 5.45 0.99 74.2%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%



Factor 7 // Professional Values NP 0% 57 5.88 0.96 81.3%

Factor 9 // Technical Skills NP 0% 56 5.45 1.18 74.2%

Factor 11 // Role Development NP 0% 58 5.00 1.05 66.7%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%








LONGITUDINAL TRENDS

OVERALL INDICATOR PERFORMANCE 1ST PREDICTOR 2ND PREDICTORFactor 13 // Overall Learning Factor 8 // Core Competencies Factor 10 // Core Knowledge

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance -- -- 85.6% 74.1% 79.4%

Mean -- -- 6.14 5.44 5.77

Performance 79.1% 80.3% 80.4% 74.0% 74.5%

Mean 5.74 5.82 5.82 5.44 5.47

Performance 76.1% 77.6% 79.9% 72.5% 74.1%

Mean 5.56 5.66 5.80 5.35 5.45





In this series of reports, you will find a summary of the indicator, Overall. This summary includes current performance, external benchmarking,recommendations for improvement, and longitudinal trends. Together these analyses create a picture of your institution's performance andprovide guidance for future improvement efforts. If you need to better understand the behavior of a factor, please reference its section (tabs arelabeled by factor numbers). Also, please reference Skyfactor Benchworks' Online Reports for additional reporting.

Summary // The analyses below allow you to monitor the overall performance of the indicator, Overall. Included are the current performance ofthe indicator’s dependent variable, Overall Program Effectiveness, your institutional strength and weakness (the highest and lowest performancefactor within this indicator), peer comparison (the factors where your institution performs best and worst against your Select 6), and thelongitudinal trend of Overall Program Effectiveness. In subsequent indicator reports, we provide in-depth information in each of these areas.


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL



0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL




0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL




0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

LONGITUDINAL TREND // OVERALL PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS

60%

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 70.5% 68.0% 81.1% 62.3% 72.9%

Mean 5.23 5.08 5.86 4.74 5.37

INDICATOR // OVERALL





Current Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Overall Program Effectiveness. This factor would be difficult to improve directly, but improvingits predictors should result in its improvement. Be sure to review the Recommendations section, within the indicatior, before creating yourimprovement plan.




0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

Below is the current performance of the factors associated with the Overall indicator. Please review all of the information in this section beforecreating your program’s Action Plan to improve Overall Program Effectiveness. It is natural to want to improve the lowest performing factors, butbe careful! Improving the lowest performing factor may not improve Overall Program Effectiveness if it is not a predictor. Finish reviewing allanalysis before developing your improvement plan.




Factor 6 // Advisor 59 5.64 1.40 77.3%










0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%





Current Performance // Key PopulationsSkyfactor continues to analyze the current performance of Overall Program Effectiveness by investigating how key subpopulations rate yourinstitution’s performance. Key categorical questions have been selected and are reported on below. Answer options within each categoricalquestion have been divided into two groups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which isstatistically higher than the other population, a designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populationshave statistically equal factor means. Relative population size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. Analysis for othersubpopulations can be found in Skyfactor’s Online Reporting.



STDDEV PERFORMANCE

Female 50 5.43 1.21 73.8%

52 86.7% Male 7 4.98 0.87 66.3%




STDDEV PERFORMANCE

White 55 5.33 1.19 72.2%





STDDEV PERFORMANCE






STDDEV PERFORMANCE

3.00 GPA and higher 50 5.44 1.14 74.0%

53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 4.61 1.30 60.2%







STDDEV PERFORMANCE

SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.07 1.21 67.8%







The second piece of the analysis picture is External Benchmarking. Throughout this report and in Skyfactor’s Online Reporting, Benchworkscompares your institutional data to the aggregate of your external benchmarking groups. If your Action Plan for institutional improvementincludes improving Overall Program Effectiveness and if your program is performing below any of these external benchmarking groups, thisinformation can be used to convince staff that higher performance is possible. If your institutional performance is higher than any of thesegroups, use this to celebrate!

Below is a comparison of your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for the indicator’s dependentvariable, Overall Program Effectiveness, and the other factors associated with this indicator. A designates factors where your institutionperforms statistically higher than that external benchmarking group; a designates factors where your program is statistically lower inperformance; and a represents factors that are statistically equal with that external benchmarking group. The chart represents yourinstitution’s performance on each factor.


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL



0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL



Factor 6 // Advisor 59 5.64 1.40 77.3%










0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%





Arguably the most important piece of the analysis is Recommendations for Improvement In order to improve Overall Program Effectiveness, it isnecessary to know which factors have the greatest impact. Improving factors with high impact should lead to an improvement in Overall ProgramEffectiveness. The first chart shown below is the current performance for Overall Program Effectiveness. If this performance is below yourdesired level, identify the high impact factors (listed below) and focus your institution’s improvement efforts on those factors.




0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

Skyfactor has grouped the Overall Program Effectiveness predictors into high and low impact as calculated from a multi-variant linear regressionanalysis. The strongest predictor is labeled as “1st”, the second strongest is “2nd”, and so forth. We label factors that do not contribute to thevariance as “NP” (non-predictor). Skyfactor recommends your program focus its resources to improve the performance of your high impactfactors while maintaining, but not expending resources to improve, low/no impact factor performance.

HIGH IMPACT FACTORS


Factor 4 // Facilities and Administration 1ST 64.2% 59 4.44 1.19 57.3%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%



Factor 7 // Professional Values NP 0% 57 5.88 0.96 81.3%

Factor 6 // Advisor NP 0% 59 5.64 1.40 77.3%

Factor 3 // Course Lecture and Interaction NP 0% 59 5.56 1.01 76.0%

Factor 8 // Core Competencies NP 0% 58 5.47 1.10 74.5%

Factor 9 // Technical Skills NP 0% 56 5.45 1.18 74.2%

Factor 10 // Core Knowledge NP 0% 58 5.45 0.99 74.2%

Factor 5 // Classmates NP 0% 59 5.20 1.20 70.0%

Factor 2 // Work and Class Size NP 0% 59 5.08 1.08 68.0%

Factor 11 // Role Development NP 0% 58 5.00 1.05 66.7%

Factor 1 // Quality of Nursing Instruction NP 0% 59 4.87 1.15 64.5%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%








LONGITUDINAL TRENDS

OVERALL INDICATOR PERFORMANCE 1ST PREDICTORFactor 14 // Overall ProgramEffectiveness

Factor 4 // Facilities and Administration

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 70.5% 68.0% 81.1% 62.3% 72.9%

Mean 5.23 5.08 5.86 4.74 5.37

Performance 69.0% 68.1% 67.0% 55.2% 57.4%

Mean 5.14 5.09 5.02 4.31 4.44




FACTOR COMPOSITION FACTOR PERFORMANCE EXTERNAL BENCHMARKING LONGITUDINAL TRENDS

Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Quality of Nursing Instruction, in this section of reports.

You are likely referencing this section to better understand this factor due to: 1) this factor is a high predictor; 2) this factor is performing below adesired level; 3) this factor is of special interest to your institution; or 4) this factor is an indicator. Through this analysis (i.e., currentperformance, external benchmark comparisons, and longitudinal trends), a thorough picture of the factor should emerge, however additionalinformation can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.

If improving this factor is a goal for your institution, actions should be targeted toward the factor’s scaled questions (see list below) which aremore tangible and more directly actionable. Analysis for these scaled questions is provided in this section allowing for sufficient understanding;additional information can be found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.

FACTOR COMPOSITION

Quality of Nursing Instruction // Rate the quality of the BSN program regarding:

Q032 // Teaching in your clinical courses

Q033 // Teaching in your classroom courses

Q034 // Feedback on assignments (other than grades) you received from instructors in your clinical courses

Q035 // Feedback on assignments (other than grades) you received from instructors in your classroom courses

Q037 // Accessibility of faculty outside class

Q038 // Faculty responsiveness to student concerns

FACTOR 1 // Satisfaction: Quality of Nursing Instruction


2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Factor 1 // 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission


There are many pieces of analysis that, when combined, create a comprehensive picture of your institution’s performance for this factor. The firstanalysis to examine is the current performance of the factor. This information, coupled with understanding of individual population perceptions,external benchmarks, longitudinal trends, individual scaled question performance, and other institutional information or assessment is invaluableto constructing an effective Action Plan for improvement.

Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Quality of Nursing Instruction and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult toimprove directly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.

FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 1 // Satisfaction: Quality of Nursing Instruction 59 4.87 1.15 64.5%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

FACTOR QUESTION PERFORMANCE


Q032 // Teaching in your clinical courses 56 5.16 1.19 69.3%

Q037 // Accessibility of faculty outside class 56 5.14 1.39 69.0%

Q038 // Faculty responsiveness to student concerns 57 4.95 1.44 65.8%

Q033 // Teaching in your classroom courses 56 4.70 1.41 61.7%

Q035 // Feedback on assignments (other than grades) you received from instructors inyour classroom courses

56 4.52 1.40 58.7%

Q034 // Feedback on assignments (other than grades) you received from instructors inyour clinical courses

57 4.49 1.29 58.2%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%





Factor Performance // Key PopulationsKey categorical questions have been selected and are reported below. Answer options within each categorical question are divided into twogroups in order to facilitate a statistical testing of means; a designates the population which is statistically higher than the other population, a

designates the population that is statistically lower and an indicates that the populations have statistically equal factor means. Relativepopulation size (% Total) and Performance values for each group are plotted. To review this factor reported by all categorical questions and for allanswer options, please refer to the Online Reporting.

If this factor is included in your Action Plan, consider the behavior of these populations to determine if targeted interventions are needed.



STDDEV PERFORMANCE

Female 51 4.90 1.20 65.0%

52 86.7% Male 8 4.74 0.73 62.3%




STDDEV PERFORMANCE

White 57 4.86 1.16 64.3%





STDDEV PERFORMANCE






STDDEV PERFORMANCE

3.00 GPA and higher 52 4.98 1.04 66.3%

53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 3.94 1.60 49.0%







STDDEV PERFORMANCE

SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 4.84 0.83 64.0%







Factor Performance // Degree ProgramIn this report, the institutional mean and a breakdown by Degree Program is provided. If this factor is included in your Action Plan, identify thepopulations reporting more positive experiences in order to examine if there are best practices that can be applied to populations reporting lesspositive experiences.

FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 1 // Satisfaction: Quality of Nursing Instruction 59 4.87 1.15 64.5%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

FACTOR PERFORMANCE BY DEGREE PROGRAM


RN-to-BSN (completed an RN) 13 5.46 1.32 74.3%

BSN, with no prior nursing experience or degree 44 4.68 1.04 61.3%

BSN, have completed other non-nursing degree(s) 2 NR NR NR NR

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%





In this report, Skyfactor Benchworks compares your institutional results to your Select 6, Carnegie Class, and all participating institutions for thefactor and its scaled questions. A designates where your institution’s mean is statistically higher than the comparative group; a designateswhere your institution’s mean is statistically lower than the comparative group; and designates where your institution’s mean is statisticallyequal to the comparative group. A ranking of your institution and the external benchmarking groups is also provided. If your institution’sperformance is below that of an external benchmarking group, use this information to motivate staff that higher performance is possible; but ifyour institutional performance is higher, celebrate!

FACTOR PERFORMANCE

N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE

RANK STAT SIGMIN MAX PERFORMANCE

Your Institution 59 4.87 1.15 -- -- -- -- 64.5%

Select 6 440 5.05 1.02 4.65 5.46 5/7 67.5%

Carnegie Class 755 5.10 1.15 4.32 6.49 16/23 68.3%

All Institutions 26,769 4.98 1.14 3.36 6.49 163/270 66.3%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Q032 // Teaching in your clinical courses 56 5.16 1.19 69.3%

Q037 // Accessibility of faculty outside class 56 5.14 1.39 69.0%

Q038 // Faculty responsiveness to studentconcerns

57 4.95 1.44 65.8%

Q033 // Teaching in your classroom courses 56 4.70 1.41 61.7%

Q035 // Feedback on assignments (other thangrades) you received from instructors in yourclassroom courses

56 4.52 1.40 58.7%

Q034 // Feedback on assignments (other thangrades) you received from instructors in yourclinical courses

57 4.49 1.29 58.2%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

FACTOR 1 // Quality of Nursing Instruction




The final analysis for the factor is its performance over time. Longitudinal trends support continuous improvement and are the key to evaluatingthe success of your institution’s action plan for this factor. If your institution’s current performance falls short of expectations, review the actionsconducted and make adjustments.

If your institution participated in two or more iterations of this assessment, a longitudinal trend is plotted. If your institution did not participatecontinuously, Skyfactor extrapolated between successive iterations. A designates years where your institution performs statistically higherthan the current year; a designates years where your program is statistically lower in performance; and a represents years that arestatistically equal to the current year.

LONGITUDINAL TREND

50%

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 71.9% 68.5% 68.4% 54.4% 64.6%

Mean 5.31 5.11 5.11 4.27 4.87




Q032 // Quality of Nursing Instruction // Rate the quality of the BSN program regarding: Teaching in yourclinical courses

A summary of Q032 is provided. Please visit Skyfactor's Online Reporting to understand how different populations perceive this question.

A comparison of your institution’s results with your external benchmarking groups is shown below. In addition to current performance, Skyfactorreports the range of means across the external benchmarking groups and the rank of your institution within those groups.


N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 435 5.36 1.14 5.16 5.82 7/7 72.7%

Carnegie Class 710 5.26 1.24 4.22 6.64 14/22 71.0%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

Scaled questions have seven answer options ranging from “1” (least desired response) to “7” (most desired response). Below is the breakdownof your institution’s results and the results of your external benchmarking groups.

ANSWER FREQUENCY

VERY POOR ------------------------------------- GOOD ------------------------------------- EXCEPTIONAL

1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //

Your Institution 0.0% 1.8% 7.1% 19.6% 28.6% 30.4% 12.5%

Select 6 0.5% 0.7% 5.1% 14.7% 28.7% 35.6% 14.7%

Carnegie Class 0.4% 1.0% 7.7% 18.0% 25.1% 31.9% 15.9%

All Institutions 0.5% 1.5% 6.8% 15.7% 26.7% 32.9% 15.9%

0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%

A longitudinal trend and table for this question is shown below.

LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 72.6% 69.7% 68.5% 60.8% 69.3%

Mean 5.35 5.18 5.11 4.65 5.16

FACTOR 1 // Satisfaction: Quality of Nursing Instruction // Q032



Q033 // Quality of Nursing Instruction // Rate the quality of the BSN program regarding: Teaching in yourclassroom courses




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 439 4.90 1.23 4.27 5.64 5/7 65.0%

Carnegie Class 735 5.04 1.26 3.67 6.36 16/22 67.3%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.2% 1.6% 12.3% 23.5% 27.8% 25.7% 8.9%

Carnegie Class 0.6% 2.3% 8.3% 23.8% 25.4% 27.8% 11.8%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

50%

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 71.5% 68.0% 67.1% 55.1% 61.6%

Mean 5.29 5.08 5.03 4.31 4.70




Q034 // Quality of Nursing Instruction // Rate the quality of the BSN program regarding: Feedback onassignments (other than grades) you received from instructors in your clinical courses




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 435 5.15 1.22 4.49 5.45 7/7 69.2%

Carnegie Class 720 5.00 1.34 4.22 6.36 22/23 66.7%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.0% 1.4% 9.0% 20.0% 25.7% 31.0% 12.9%

Carnegie Class 1.5% 1.8% 10.2% 22.8% 25.2% 26.0% 12.5%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

40%

50%

60%

70%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 65.6% 59.6% 61.1% 50.0% 58.2%

Mean 4.94 4.58 4.67 4.00 4.49




Q035 // Quality of Nursing Instruction // Rate the quality of the BSN program regarding: Feedback onassignments (other than grades) you received from instructors in your classroom courses




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 436 4.66 1.28 4.35 5.14 6/7 61.0%

Carnegie Class 736 4.84 1.34 4.08 6.21 18/22 64.0%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.2% 3.7% 14.9% 27.3% 27.3% 18.1% 8.5%

Carnegie Class 1.4% 2.5% 12.9% 23.9% 25.6% 23.1% 10.6%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

40%

50%

60%

70%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 65.6% 58.3% 59.2% 50.7% 58.6%

Mean 4.94 4.50 4.55 4.04 4.52




Q037 // Quality of Nursing Instruction // Rate the quality of the BSN program regarding: Accessibility offaculty outside class




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 434 5.20 1.29 4.68 5.86 5/7 70.0%

Carnegie Class 741 5.38 1.41 4.50 6.64 14/22 73.0%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.5% 1.4% 8.8% 18.4% 26.7% 26.7% 17.5%

Carnegie Class 0.8% 2.0% 8.0% 17.4% 19.9% 24.6% 27.2%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

50%

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 77.4% 78.4% 77.6% 58.6% 69.0%

Mean 5.65 5.70 5.66 4.51 5.14




Q038 // Quality of Nursing Instruction // Rate the quality of the BSN program regarding: Facultyresponsiveness to student concerns




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 439 5.02 1.38 4.35 5.58 5/7 67.0%

Carnegie Class 750 5.05 1.63 3.71 6.71 14/23 67.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.2% 3.4% 11.4% 22.3% 19.8% 27.6% 15.3%

Carnegie Class 2.7% 4.7% 11.2% 16.9% 19.1% 22.3% 23.2%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 78.8% 77.0% 75.4% 52.0% 65.8%

Mean 5.73 5.62 5.52 4.12 4.95





Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Work and Class Size, in this section of reports.



FACTOR COMPOSITION

Work and Class Size // How satisfied are you with the:

Q046 // Amount of work required of you in your classroom courses

Q047 // Amount of work required of you in your clinical courses

Q048 // Amount of collaboration required in your courses

Q049 // Value you derived from your collaboration experiences

FACTOR 2 // Satisfaction: Work and Class Size





Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Work and Class Size and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improvedirectly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.

FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 2 // Satisfaction: Work and Class Size 59 5.08 1.08 68.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%



Q047 // Amount of work required of you in your clinical courses 57 5.14 1.48 69.0%

Q049 // Value you derived from your collaboration experiences 59 5.12 1.32 68.7%

Q048 // Amount of collaboration required in your courses 59 5.08 1.25 68.0%

Q046 // Amount of work required of you in your classroom courses 56 4.93 1.28 65.5%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%










STDDEV PERFORMANCE

Female 51 5.09 1.13 68.2%

52 86.7% Male 8 4.99 0.67 66.5%




STDDEV PERFORMANCE

White 57 5.05 1.09 67.5%





STDDEV PERFORMANCE






STDDEV PERFORMANCE

3.00 GPA and higher 52 5.23 0.99 70.5%

53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 3.62 0.80 43.7%







STDDEV PERFORMANCE

SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 4.85 0.75 64.2%








FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 2 // Satisfaction: Work and Class Size 59 5.08 1.08 68.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






FACTOR PERFORMANCE

N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 439 5.11 1.14 4.52 6.39 5/7 68.5%

Carnegie Class 752 5.29 1.26 4.47 6.45 15/23 71.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Q047 // Amount of work required of you in yourclinical courses

57 5.14 1.48 69.0%

Q049 // Value you derived from your collaborationexperiences

59 5.12 1.32 68.7%

Q048 // Amount of collaboration required in yourcourses

59 5.08 1.25 68.0%

Q046 // Amount of work required of you in yourclassroom courses

56 4.93 1.28 65.5%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

FACTOR 2 // Work and Class Size






LONGITUDINAL TREND

50%

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 72.2% 72.6% 74.9% 57.5% 68.0%

Mean 5.33 5.36 5.49 4.45 5.08




Q046 // Course Work // How satisfied are you with the: Amount of work required of you in your classroomcourses




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 438 5.02 1.35 4.11 6.29 5/7 67.0%

Carnegie Class 743 5.26 1.37 3.62 6.40 17/22 71.0%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY

VERY DISSATISFIED ------------------------------ NEUTRAL ------------------------------ VERY SATISFIED

1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.7% 5.0% 8.0% 18.0% 26.0% 30.6% 11.6%

Carnegie Class 1.0% 2.9% 6.5% 18.4% 23.4% 28.3% 19.5%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

50%

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 71.2% 71.9% 75.4% 59.3% 65.5%

Mean 5.27 5.32 5.52 4.56 4.93

FACTOR 2 // Satisfaction: Work and Class Size // Q046



Q047 // Course Work // How satisfied are you with the: Amount of work required of you in your clinicalcourses




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 434 5.23 1.33 4.72 6.14 5/7 70.5%

Carnegie Class 714 5.29 1.47 4.39 6.33 14/23 71.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 1.6% 2.1% 6.2% 16.4% 25.3% 32.5% 15.9%

Carnegie Class 2.3% 3.1% 5.6% 17.0% 20.6% 28.4% 23.0%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 63.9% 65.8% 72.4% 50.0% 69.0%

Mean 4.83 4.95 5.34 4.00 5.14




Q048 // Course Work // How satisfied are you with the: Amount of collaboration required in your courses




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 435 5.13 1.33 4.71 6.57 4/7 68.8%

Carnegie Class 744 5.31 1.41 4.49 6.57 13/23 71.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 1.4% 3.7% 3.9% 20.9% 25.7% 30.1% 14.3%

Carnegie Class 1.7% 2.6% 4.7% 17.9% 23.3% 27.9% 21.8%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

50%

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 75.7% 75.9% 74.8% 60.4% 68.1%

Mean 5.54 5.55 5.49 4.63 5.08




Q049 // Course Work // How satisfied are you with the: Value you derived from your collaboration experiences




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 431 5.06 1.44 4.68 6.57 4/7 67.7%

Carnegie Class 731 5.30 1.54 4.36 6.64 12/23 71.7%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 1.6% 5.1% 6.7% 18.6% 22.5% 30.6% 14.8%

Carnegie Class 2.7% 3.9% 4.7% 16.5% 20.4% 27.1% 24.8%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 78.1% 76.8% 78.2% 61.2% 68.6%

Mean 5.69 5.61 5.69 4.67 5.12





Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Course Lecture and Interaction, in this section of reports.



FACTOR COMPOSITION

Course Lecture and Interaction // How satisfied are you with the faculty's ability to:

Q039 // Relate concepts to the real world

Q040 // Draw on experience of students

Q041 // Engage students in discussions

Q042 // Communicate effectively

Q043 // Effectively sequence content of courses

Q044 // Interact with students

Q045 // Act as effective role models in clinical practice

FACTOR 3 // Satisfaction: Course Lecture and Interaction





Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Course Lecture and Interaction and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult toimprove directly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.

FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 3 // Satisfaction: Course Lecture and Interaction 59 5.56 1.01 76.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%



Q045 // Act as effective role models in clinical practice 56 5.79 1.06 79.8%

Q044 // Interact with students 59 5.68 1.19 78.0%

Q041 // Engage students in discussions 59 5.64 1.26 77.3%

Q039 // Relate concepts to the real world 59 5.63 1.18 77.2%

Q042 // Communicate effectively 59 5.49 1.32 74.8%

Q043 // Effectively sequence content of courses 59 5.36 1.32 72.7%

Q040 // Draw on experience of students 58 5.33 1.26 72.2%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%










STDDEV PERFORMANCE

Female 51 5.58 1.06 76.3%

52 86.7% Male 8 5.41 0.54 73.5%




STDDEV PERFORMANCE

White 57 5.54 1.02 75.7%





STDDEV PERFORMANCE






STDDEV PERFORMANCE

3.00 GPA and higher 52 5.65 0.97 77.5%

53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 4.71 1.06 61.8%







STDDEV PERFORMANCE

SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.43 0.71 73.8%








FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 3 // Satisfaction: Course Lecture and Interaction 59 5.56 1.01 76.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






FACTOR PERFORMANCE

N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 440 5.65 0.99 5.13 6.31 5/7 77.5%

Carnegie Class 829 5.79 1.10 4.90 6.81 18/24 79.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Q045 // Act as effective role models in clinicalpractice

56 5.79 1.06 79.8%

Q044 // Interact with students 59 5.68 1.19 78.0%

Q041 // Engage students in discussions 59 5.64 1.26 77.3%

Q039 // Relate concepts to the real world 59 5.63 1.18 77.2%

Q042 // Communicate effectively 59 5.49 1.32 74.8%

Q043 // Effectively sequence content of courses 59 5.36 1.32 72.7%

Q040 // Draw on experience of students 58 5.33 1.26 72.2%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

FACTOR 3 // Course Lecture and Interaction






LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 82.0% 81.7% 79.6% 67.0% 76.0%

Mean 5.92 5.90 5.78 5.02 5.56




Q039 // Engaging Pedagogies // How satisfied are you with the faculty's ability to: Relate concepts to the realworld




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 439 5.73 1.14 5.32 6.14 5/7 78.8%

Carnegie Class 826 5.86 1.22 5.05 6.67 17/24 81.0%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.5% 0.7% 2.5% 10.0% 22.8% 34.9% 28.7%

Carnegie Class 0.7% 0.8% 2.5% 10.4% 19.2% 27.8% 38.6%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 82.3% 81.6% 78.4% 67.9% 77.1%

Mean 5.94 5.89 5.70 5.07 5.63

FACTOR 3 // Satisfaction: Course Lecture and Interaction // Q039



Q040 // Engaging Pedagogies // How satisfied are you with the faculty's ability to: Draw on experience ofstudents




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 437 5.51 1.22 4.98 6.43 5/7 75.2%

Carnegie Class 822 5.71 1.26 4.67 6.79 20/24 78.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.5% 1.1% 5.0% 12.8% 24.0% 34.1% 22.4%

Carnegie Class 0.9% 0.8% 3.4% 12.2% 21.8% 28.1% 32.8%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 82.3% 83.8% 77.5% 64.9% 72.1%

Mean 5.94 6.03 5.65 4.90 5.33




Q041 // Engaging Pedagogies // How satisfied are you with the faculty's ability to: Engage students indiscussions




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 435 5.67 1.16 5.15 6.43 5/7 77.8%

Carnegie Class 818 5.85 1.27 4.96 6.86 15/24 80.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.2% 0.7% 3.9% 11.3% 22.1% 34.9% 26.9%

Carnegie Class 1.0% 1.3% 3.4% 8.2% 16.5% 32.5% 37.1%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 85.5% 86.0% 81.5% 68.6% 77.4%

Mean 6.13 6.16 5.89 5.12 5.64




Q042 // Engaging Pedagogies // How satisfied are you with the faculty's ability to: Communicate effectively




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 433 5.48 1.24 4.75 6.17 5/7 74.7%

Carnegie Class 805 5.58 1.38 4.00 6.79 16/23 76.3%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.7% 1.4% 5.8% 10.9% 25.2% 35.1% 21.0%

Carnegie Class 1.2% 2.0% 6.4% 10.1% 20.5% 29.6% 30.3%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 80.6% 76.1% 76.9% 60.9% 74.9%

Mean 5.83 5.57 5.61 4.66 5.49




Q043 // Engaging Pedagogies // How satisfied are you with the faculty's ability to: Effectively sequencecontent of courses




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 434 5.44 1.31 4.90 6.29 5/7 74.0%

Carnegie Class 746 5.64 1.32 4.22 6.79 18/23 77.3%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.9% 3.2% 3.7% 12.0% 25.8% 32.0% 22.4%

Carnegie Class 1.1% 2.1% 3.6% 10.2% 23.5% 28.6% 30.9%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 81.2% 79.7% 82.9% 68.9% 72.6%

Mean 5.87 5.78 5.97 5.13 5.36




Q044 // Engaging Pedagogies // How satisfied are you with the faculty's ability to: Interact with students




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 431 5.81 1.16 5.34 6.43 5/7 80.2%

Carnegie Class 814 5.87 1.27 4.95 6.87 17/23 81.2%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.2% 1.2% 2.8% 8.8% 20.0% 33.9% 33.2%

Carnegie Class 0.6% 1.7% 3.8% 8.2% 15.1% 32.0% 38.6%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 79.5% 81.6% 76.6% 67.9% 78.0%

Mean 5.77 5.89 5.59 5.07 5.68




Q045 // Engaging Pedagogies // How satisfied are you with the faculty's ability to: Act as effective rolemodels in clinical practice




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 434 5.89 1.13 5.33 6.33 5/7 81.5%

Carnegie Class 721 5.93 1.29 5.00 6.93 16/22 82.2%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.7% 0.7% 1.4% 8.5% 18.7% 35.0% 35.0%

Carnegie Class 1.0% 1.8% 2.4% 7.7% 14.4% 30.6% 42.0%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 83.7% 82.9% 85.2% 70.6% 79.8%

Mean 6.02 5.97 6.11 5.23 5.79





Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Facilities and Administration, in this section of reports.



FACTOR COMPOSITION

Facilities and Administration // Regarding the school of nursing, how satisfied are you with the:

Q056 // Medical computer technology

Q057 // Training to use medical computer technology

Q058 // Responsiveness of the program administration to student concerns

Q059 // Tuition/fee level of the program

Q060 // Program course schedule

Q061 // Career placement

Q062 // Financial aid

FACTOR 4 // Satisfaction: Facilities and Administration





Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Facilities and Administration and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult toimprove directly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.

FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 4 // Satisfaction: Facilities and Administration 59 4.44 1.19 57.3%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%



Q060 // Program course schedule 59 4.93 1.40 65.5%

Q062 // Financial aid 54 4.78 1.56 63.0%

Q058 // Responsiveness of the program administration to student concerns 57 4.53 1.73 58.8%

Q061 // Career placement 50 4.14 1.61 52.3%

Q057 // Training to use medical computer technology 52 4.10 1.44 51.7%

Q059 // Tuition/fee level of the program 58 4.09 1.76 51.5%

Q056 // Medical computer technology 53 4.04 1.61 50.7%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%










STDDEV PERFORMANCE

Female 51 4.50 1.18 58.3%

52 86.7% Male 8 4.09 1.16 51.5%




STDDEV PERFORMANCE

White 57 4.41 1.19 56.8%





STDDEV PERFORMANCE






STDDEV PERFORMANCE

3.00 GPA and higher 52 4.49 1.21 58.2%

53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 3.81 0.73 46.8%







STDDEV PERFORMANCE

SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 4.24 1.26 54.0%








FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 4 // Satisfaction: Facilities and Administration 59 4.44 1.19 57.3%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






FACTOR PERFORMANCE

N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 439 4.79 1.16 3.89 5.61 6/7 63.2%

Carnegie Class 752 4.95 1.29 4.00 6.54 17/23 65.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Q060 // Program course schedule 59 4.93 1.40 65.5%

Q062 // Financial aid 54 4.78 1.56 63.0%

Q058 // Responsiveness of the programadministration to student concerns

57 4.53 1.73 58.8%

Q061 // Career placement 50 4.14 1.61 52.3%

Q057 // Training to use medical computertechnology

52 4.10 1.44 51.7%

Q059 // Tuition/fee level of the program 58 4.09 1.76 51.5%

Q056 // Medical computer technology 53 4.04 1.61 50.7%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

FACTOR 4 // Facilities and Administration






LONGITUDINAL TREND

50%

60%

70%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 69.0% 68.1% 67.0% 55.2% 57.4%

Mean 5.14 5.09 5.02 4.31 4.44




Q056 // Administration and Support Services // Regarding the school of nursing, how satisfied are you withthe: Medical computer technology




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 426 5.24 1.41 4.04 6.00 7/7 70.7%

Carnegie Class 692 5.19 1.60 4.00 6.75 21/22 69.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 2.1% 2.1% 5.6% 18.8% 22.8% 28.2% 20.4%

Carnegie Class 3.4% 4.7% 7.8% 18.5% 17.6% 23.6% 24.4%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 75.0% 74.1% 67.6% 59.3% 50.6%

Mean 5.50 5.45 5.06 4.56 4.04

FACTOR 4 // Satisfaction: Facilities and Administration // Q056



Q057 // Administration and Support Services // Regarding the school of nursing, how satisfied are you withthe: Training to use medical computer technology




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 422 4.99 1.49 4.10 5.86 7/7 66.5%

Carnegie Class 684 4.93 1.68 3.62 6.21 19/22 65.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 3.3% 3.3% 6.9% 22.0% 22.7% 25.4% 16.4%

Carnegie Class 4.3% 5.8% 9.1% 21.2% 18.5% 20.4% 20.7%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

50%

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 71.9% 72.4% 66.7% 56.5% 51.6%

Mean 5.31 5.34 5.00 4.39 4.10




Q058 // Administration and Support Services // Regarding the school of nursing, how satisfied are you withthe: Responsiveness of the program administration to student concerns




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 426 4.98 1.57 3.82 5.71 6/7 66.3%

Carnegie Class 734 5.11 1.72 3.78 6.50 16/22 68.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 3.1% 5.4% 9.2% 16.7% 20.9% 27.9% 16.9%

Carnegie Class 5.2% 4.7% 8.3% 15.7% 17.7% 23.3% 25.2%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 72.3% 67.5% 65.7% 47.2% 58.8%

Mean 5.34 5.05 4.94 3.83 4.53




Q059 // Administration and Support Services // Regarding the school of nursing, how satisfied are you withthe: Tuition/fee level of the program




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 434 3.91 1.69 2.73 5.00 5/7 48.5%

Carnegie Class 747 4.39 1.83 2.88 6.79 13/23 56.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 10.4% 12.2% 16.6% 23.3% 18.2% 12.7% 6.7%

Carnegie Class 9.4% 7.7% 12.8% 23.6% 15.3% 15.3% 15.9%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

50%

60%

70%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 67.4% 64.9% 61.3% 56.7% 51.4%

Mean 5.04 4.89 4.68 4.40 4.09




Q060 // Administration and Support Services // Regarding the school of nursing, how satisfied are you withthe: Program course schedule




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 431 5.01 1.41 4.21 6.29 6/7 66.8%

Carnegie Class 744 5.35 1.45 3.98 6.57 18/23 72.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 1.9% 3.2% 9.7% 17.9% 26.2% 26.9% 14.2%

Carnegie Class 1.9% 2.0% 7.5% 16.6% 20.3% 26.5% 25.3%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 73.0% 71.1% 77.5% 62.7% 65.5%

Mean 5.38 5.26 5.65 4.76 4.93




Q061 // Administration and Support Services // Regarding the school of nursing, how satisfied are you withthe: Career placement




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 401 4.88 1.68 3.72 5.32 5/6 64.7%

Carnegie Class 607 4.77 1.75 3.43 6.71 16/20 62.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 4.7% 6.5% 6.2% 23.7% 16.2% 23.2% 19.5%

Carnegie Class 6.1% 6.5% 8.2% 26.5% 13.9% 18.9% 19.9%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

40%

50%

60%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 44.7% 57.8% 55.2% 43.0% 52.3%

Mean 3.68 4.47 4.31 3.58 4.14




Q062 // Administration and Support Services // Regarding the school of nursing, how satisfied are you withthe: Financial aid




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 392 4.48 1.64 3.69 5.01 2/6 58.0%

Carnegie Class 669 4.78 1.83 3.71 6.85 11/21 63.0%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 6.4% 6.1% 10.5% 29.6% 18.4% 15.8% 13.3%

Carnegie Class 7.3% 5.5% 9.1% 21.4% 15.2% 18.9% 22.4%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

50%

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 69.8% 68.6% 65.6% 56.9% 63.0%

Mean 5.19 5.12 4.94 4.41 4.78





Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Classmates, in this section of reports.



FACTOR COMPOSITION

Classmates // Regarding your fellow students how satisfied were you with their:

Q050 // Academic ability

Q051 // Ability to work in study groups

Q052 // Level of camaraderie

Q053 // Academic integrity

FACTOR 5 // Satisfaction: Classmates





Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Classmates and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improve directly,improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.

FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 5 // Satisfaction: Classmates 59 5.20 1.20 70.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%



Q050 // Academic ability 59 5.54 1.18 75.7%

Q053 // Academic integrity 59 5.19 1.48 69.8%

Q052 // Level of camaraderie 59 5.12 1.53 68.7%

Q051 // Ability to work in study groups 58 4.95 1.62 65.8%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%










STDDEV PERFORMANCE

Female 51 5.29 1.21 71.5%

52 86.7% Male 8 4.62 0.94 60.3%




STDDEV PERFORMANCE

White 57 5.15 1.19 69.2%





STDDEV PERFORMANCE






STDDEV PERFORMANCE

3.00 GPA and higher 52 5.23 1.22 70.5%

53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 4.83 0.96 63.8%







STDDEV PERFORMANCE

SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 4.78 1.06 63.0%








FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 5 // Satisfaction: Classmates 59 5.20 1.20 70.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






FACTOR PERFORMANCE

N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 440 5.61 1.10 5.20 6.14 7/7 76.8%

Carnegie Class 747 5.61 1.22 4.50 6.71 19/23 76.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Q050 // Academic ability 59 5.54 1.18 75.7%

Q053 // Academic integrity 59 5.19 1.48 69.8%

Q052 // Level of camaraderie 59 5.12 1.53 68.7%

Q051 // Ability to work in study groups 58 4.95 1.62 65.8%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

FACTOR 5 // Classmates






LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 73.6% 73.3% 72.0% 63.5% 70.1%

Mean 5.42 5.40 5.32 4.81 5.20




Q050 // Academic Peers // Regarding your fellow students how satisfied were you with their: Academicability




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 437 5.76 1.12 5.37 6.14 6/7 79.3%

Carnegie Class 742 5.77 1.18 4.88 6.75 18/23 79.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.2% 0.9% 1.8% 10.8% 21.5% 35.5% 29.3%

Carnegie Class 0.5% 0.5% 2.5% 12.5% 19.6% 32.1% 32.3%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 76.7% 79.7% 74.3% 65.7% 75.7%

Mean 5.60 5.78 5.46 4.94 5.54

FACTOR 5 // Satisfaction: Classmates // Q050



Q051 // Academic Peers // Regarding your fellow students how satisfied were you with their: Ability to workin study groups




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 427 5.36 1.39 4.88 6.00 6/7 72.7%

Carnegie Class 719 5.33 1.53 3.75 6.57 18/22 72.2%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.9% 2.8% 7.3% 13.3% 23.9% 27.4% 24.4%

Carnegie Class 3.1% 2.7% 6.8% 14.7% 19.6% 27.4% 25.7%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

50%

60%

70%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 68.4% 65.3% 68.1% 58.2% 65.8%

Mean 5.11 4.92 5.09 4.49 4.95




Q052 // Academic Peers // Regarding your fellow students how satisfied were you with their: Level ofcamaraderie




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 437 5.61 1.37 5.12 6.14 7/7 76.8%

Carnegie Class 736 5.55 1.55 4.38 6.79 17/23 75.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 1.6% 1.6% 3.2% 14.2% 18.5% 28.6% 32.3%

Carnegie Class 2.3% 3.1% 4.9% 15.3% 15.0% 23.0% 36.4%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 72.9% 77.0% 71.3% 64.9% 68.6%

Mean 5.38 5.62 5.28 4.90 5.12




Q053 // Academic Peers // Regarding your fellow students how satisfied were you with their: Academicintegrity




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 437 5.72 1.33 5.19 6.29 7/7 78.7%

Carnegie Class 738 5.77 1.40 4.38 6.79 19/23 79.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 1.1% 2.1% 3.2% 11.0% 16.7% 32.0% 33.9%

Carnegie Class 2.0% 1.6% 3.3% 12.2% 14.8% 28.1% 38.0%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 76.7% 73.9% 73.1% 65.4% 69.8%

Mean 5.60 5.43 5.39 4.93 5.19





Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Advisor, in this section of reports.



FACTOR COMPOSITION

Advisor // To what degree was your academic advisor knowledgeable about:

Q063 // Course requirements for major

Q064 // Degree requirements

Q065 // Campus resources for personal, academic, or financial problems

FACTOR 6 // Satisfaction: Advisor





Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Advisor and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improve directly,improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.

FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 6 // Satisfaction: Advisor 59 5.64 1.40 77.3%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%



Q064 // Degree requirements 59 5.88 1.32 81.3%

Q063 // Course requirements for major 59 5.76 1.39 79.3%

Q065 // Campus resources for personal, academic, or financial problems 58 5.26 1.80 71.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%










STDDEV PERFORMANCE

Male 8 5.79 1.31 79.8%

8 13.3% Female 51 5.61 1.41 76.8%




STDDEV PERFORMANCE

White 57 5.61 1.41 76.8%





STDDEV PERFORMANCE






STDDEV PERFORMANCE

3.00 GPA and higher 52 5.76 1.24 79.3%

53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 4.50 2.10 58.3%







STDDEV PERFORMANCE

SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.67 1.16 77.8%








FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 6 // Satisfaction: Advisor 59 5.64 1.40 77.3%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






FACTOR PERFORMANCE

N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 435 5.76 1.39 5.44 6.19 5/7 79.3%

Carnegie Class 637 5.76 1.36 4.76 6.79 15/21 79.3%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Q064 // Degree requirements 59 5.88 1.32 81.3%

Q063 // Course requirements for major 59 5.76 1.39 79.3%

Q065 // Campus resources for personal,academic, or financial problems

58 5.26 1.80 71.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

FACTOR 6 // Advisor






LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

2014 2015

Performance 68.6% 77.3%

Mean 5.12 5.64




Q063 // Academic Advising // To what degree was your academic advisor knowledgeable about: Courserequirements for major




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 434 5.87 1.45 5.65 6.29 5/7 81.2%

Carnegie Class 633 5.89 1.42 4.86 6.79 16/21 81.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY

NOT AT ALL ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- EXTREMELY

1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 2.1% 2.3% 3.7% 8.1% 12.0% 25.8% 46.1%

Carnegie Class 1.9% 2.2% 2.2% 10.8% 12.1% 24.6% 46.2%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

2014 2015


Mean 5.19 5.76

FACTOR 6 // Satisfaction: Advisor // Q063



Q064 // Academic Advising // To what degree was your academic advisor knowledgeable about: Degreerequirements




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 432 5.85 1.44 5.61 6.29 4/7 80.8%

Carnegie Class 636 5.88 1.39 4.67 6.79 13/21 81.3%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 1.9% 2.8% 3.5% 7.9% 12.3% 28.0% 43.8%

Carnegie Class 1.6% 2.2% 2.0% 10.6% 12.9% 25.8% 44.9%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2014 2015


Mean 5.32 5.88




Q065 // Academic Advising // To what degree was your academic advisor knowledgeable about: Campusresources for personal, academic, or financial problems




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 407 5.52 1.57 4.92 6.00 6/7 75.3%

Carnegie Class 598 5.48 1.57 4.43 6.85 15/21 74.7%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 2.7% 3.4% 5.9% 10.3% 17.2% 25.3% 35.1%

Carnegie Class 3.2% 3.5% 4.0% 15.7% 14.9% 24.2% 34.5%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

2014 2015


Mean 4.84 5.26





Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Professional Values, in this section of reports.



FACTOR COMPOSITION

Professional Values // To what degree did the nursing program teach you to:

Q079 // Provide culturally competent care

Q080 // Support fairness in the delivery of care

Q082 // Act as an advocate for vulnerable patients

Q083 // Demonstrate accountability for your own actions

Q084 // Honor the right of patients to make decisions about their health care

FACTOR 7 // Learning: Professional Values





Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Professional Values and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improvedirectly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.

FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 7 // Learning: Professional Values 57 5.88 0.96 81.3%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%



Q084 // Honor the right of patients to make decisions about their health care 57 6.19 1.07 86.5%

Q083 // Demonstrate accountability for your own actions 57 5.98 1.08 83.0%

Q082 // Act as an advocate for vulnerable patients 56 5.91 1.12 81.8%

Q080 // Support fairness in the delivery of care 57 5.74 1.00 79.0%

Q079 // Provide culturally competent care 55 5.56 1.22 76.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%










STDDEV PERFORMANCE

Female 50 5.91 1.01 81.8%

52 86.7% Male 7 5.69 0.51 78.2%




STDDEV PERFORMANCE

White 55 5.85 0.96 80.8%





STDDEV PERFORMANCE






STDDEV PERFORMANCE

3.00 GPA and higher 50 5.94 0.88 82.3%

53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 5.30 1.36 71.7%







STDDEV PERFORMANCE

SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 6 6.00 0.98 83.3%

7 29.2% SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.79 0.91 79.8%







FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 7 // Learning: Professional Values 57 5.88 0.96 81.3%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






FACTOR PERFORMANCE

N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 437 6.04 0.90 5.88 6.33 6/7 84.0%

Carnegie Class 815 6.08 1.01 5.55 6.90 18/24 84.7%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Q084 // Honor the right of patients to makedecisions about their health care

57 6.19 1.07 86.5%

Q083 // Demonstrate accountability for your ownactions

57 5.98 1.08 83.0%

Q082 // Act as an advocate for vulnerable patients 56 5.91 1.12 81.8%

Q080 // Support fairness in the delivery of care 57 5.74 1.00 79.0%

Q079 // Provide culturally competent care 55 5.56 1.22 76.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

FACTOR 7 // Professional Values






LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 78.6% 81.1% 83.7% 77.4% 81.4%

Mean 5.71 5.87 6.02 5.65 5.88




Q079 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Provide culturally competent care




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 433 5.85 1.10 5.42 6.03 6/7 80.8%

Carnegie Class 807 5.97 1.17 5.24 6.79 21/24 82.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.5% 0.7% 1.8% 8.5% 18.9% 37.9% 31.6%

Carnegie Class 0.7% 1.0% 1.6% 8.7% 15.0% 33.3% 39.7%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 76.4% 81.6% 82.4% 74.0% 76.1%

Mean 5.58 5.89 5.95 5.44 5.56

FACTOR 7 // Learning: Professional Values // Q079



Q080 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Support fairness in the delivery of care




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 435 5.89 1.10 5.68 6.17 6/7 81.5%

Carnegie Class 734 5.93 1.19 5.38 6.86 18/23 82.2%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.5% 0.7% 2.1% 9.0% 14.0% 41.6% 32.2%

Carnegie Class 0.5% 1.3% 1.8% 9.5% 14.5% 34.5% 37.9%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 77.0% 82.0% 81.1% 75.4% 78.9%

Mean 5.62 5.92 5.86 5.52 5.74




Q082 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Act as an advocate for vulnerable patients




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 432 6.09 1.07 5.85 6.49 6/7 84.8%

Carnegie Class 808 6.15 1.10 5.58 7.00 19/24 85.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.5% 0.9% 0.9% 6.0% 13.2% 35.4% 43.1%

Carnegie Class 0.5% 0.7% 1.4% 6.6% 12.4% 29.7% 48.7%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 79.5% 78.5% 82.9% 77.4% 81.8%

Mean 5.77 5.71 5.97 5.64 5.91




Q083 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Demonstrate accountability for your own actions




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 432 6.16 1.03 5.98 6.48 7/7 86.0%

Carnegie Class 807 6.13 1.13 5.44 7.00 15/24 85.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.2% 1.2% 0.7% 5.1% 11.6% 36.1% 45.1%

Carnegie Class 0.6% 0.9% 1.3% 6.8% 11.8% 30.7% 47.9%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 79.4% 81.6% 86.9% 80.1% 83.0%

Mean 5.77 5.89 6.22 5.80 5.98




Q084 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Honor the right of patients to make decisions about their health care




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 431 6.23 0.94 6.10 6.49 4/7 87.2%

Carnegie Class 802 6.21 1.06 5.62 7.00 14/24 86.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.0% 0.7% 0.9% 4.2% 10.7% 36.2% 47.3%

Carnegie Class 0.7% 0.2% 0.7% 6.5% 11.3% 29.1% 51.5%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 78.8% 82.4% 87.1% 78.7% 86.5%

Mean 5.73 5.95 6.23 5.72 6.19





Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Core Competencies, in this section of reports.



FACTOR COMPOSITION

Core Competencies // To what degree did the nursing program teach you to:

Q069 // Apply research based knowledge as a basis for practice

Q071 // Make effective presentations

Q081 // Assist patients to interpret the meaning of health information

Q091 // Evaluate individual's ability to assume responsibility for self care

FACTOR 8 // Learning: Core Competencies





Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Core Competencies and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improvedirectly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.

FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 8 // Learning: Core Competencies 58 5.47 1.10 74.5%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%



Q069 // Apply research based knowledge as a basis for practice 57 5.67 1.29 77.8%

Q081 // Assist patients to interpret the meaning of health information 55 5.47 1.13 74.5%

Q091 // Evaluate individual's ability to assume responsibility for self care 56 5.43 1.19 73.8%

Q071 // Make effective presentations 56 5.38 1.37 73.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%










STDDEV PERFORMANCE

Female 51 5.47 1.16 74.5%

52 86.7% Male 7 5.46 0.41 74.3%




STDDEV PERFORMANCE

White 56 5.44 1.10 74.0%





STDDEV PERFORMANCE






STDDEV PERFORMANCE

3.00 GPA and higher 51 5.49 1.09 74.8%

53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 5.17 1.15 69.5%







STDDEV PERFORMANCE

SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.38 1.01 73.0%








FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 8 // Learning: Core Competencies 58 5.47 1.10 74.5%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






FACTOR PERFORMANCE

N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 437 5.83 0.86 5.47 6.04 7/7 80.5%

Carnegie Class 817 5.86 1.03 5.10 6.79 21/24 81.0%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Q069 // Apply research based knowledge as abasis for practice

57 5.67 1.29 77.8%

Q081 // Assist patients to interpret the meaning ofhealth information

55 5.47 1.13 74.5%

Q091 // Evaluate individual's ability to assumeresponsibility for self care

56 5.43 1.19 73.8%

Q071 // Make effective presentations 56 5.38 1.37 73.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

FACTOR 8 // Core Competencies






LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 79.1% 80.3% 80.4% 74.0% 74.5%

Mean 5.74 5.82 5.82 5.44 5.47




Q069 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Apply research based knowledge as a basis for practice




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 435 6.06 0.90 5.67 6.28 7/7 84.3%

Carnegie Class 813 5.98 1.13 5.15 6.86 20/24 83.0%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.0% 0.2% 0.5% 4.8% 18.2% 40.7% 35.6%

Carnegie Class 0.5% 0.9% 1.6% 8.6% 16.2% 32.3% 39.9%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 80.2% 81.6% 82.0% 76.1% 77.8%

Mean 5.81 5.89 5.92 5.57 5.67

FACTOR 8 // Learning: Core Competencies // Q069



Q071 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Make effective presentations




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 432 5.58 1.20 5.20 5.86 6/7 76.3%

Carnegie Class 808 5.69 1.26 4.92 6.79 19/24 78.2%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.9% 0.5% 4.6% 10.9% 23.1% 36.8% 23.1%

Carnegie Class 0.7% 2.0% 3.0% 12.0% 18.5% 33.6% 30.2%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 78.5% 78.9% 77.9% 73.1% 72.9%

Mean 5.71 5.74 5.68 5.39 5.38




Q081 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Assist patients to interpret the meaning of health information




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 433 5.91 1.06 5.47 6.19 7/7 81.8%

Carnegie Class 730 5.84 1.18 5.13 6.75 20/23 80.7%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.0% 1.4% 1.8% 5.8% 18.7% 40.4% 31.9%

Carnegie Class 0.5% 1.0% 2.3% 10.7% 16.6% 35.8% 33.1%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 78.1% 81.6% 80.6% 72.4% 74.5%

Mean 5.69 5.89 5.84 5.34 5.47




Q091 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Evaluate individual's ability to assume responsibility for self care




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 425 5.80 1.07 5.43 6.03 7/7 80.0%

Carnegie Class 720 5.83 1.22 5.18 6.79 19/23 80.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.2% 1.2% 1.4% 8.7% 19.5% 41.6% 27.3%

Carnegie Class 1.0% 0.8% 2.2% 10.6% 18.9% 31.3% 35.2%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 79.0% 78.9% 80.9% 75.5% 73.8%

Mean 5.74 5.74 5.85 5.53 5.43





Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Technical Skills, in this section of reports.



FACTOR COMPOSITION

Technical Skills // To what degree did the nursing program teach you to:

Q087 // Provide physical support in preparation for therapeutic procedures

Q088 // Provide emotional support in preparation for therapeutic procedures

Q089 // Provide pain reduction measures

Q090 // Manage wounds

FACTOR 9 // Learning: Technical Skills





Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Technical Skills and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improvedirectly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.

FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 9 // Learning: Technical Skills 56 5.45 1.18 74.2%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%



Q089 // Provide pain reduction measures 55 5.71 1.19 78.5%

Q087 // Provide physical support in preparation for therapeutic procedures 55 5.56 1.33 76.0%

Q088 // Provide emotional support in preparation for therapeutic procedures 55 5.45 1.28 74.2%

Q090 // Manage wounds 53 4.92 1.56 65.3%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%










STDDEV PERFORMANCE

Female 49 5.48 1.24 74.7%

52 86.7% Male 7 5.25 0.53 70.8%




STDDEV PERFORMANCE

White 54 5.42 1.19 73.7%





STDDEV PERFORMANCE

Less than one year of work experience 31 5.51 0.92 75.2%

33 55% One or more years of work experience 25 5.38 1.43 73.0%




STDDEV PERFORMANCE

3.00 GPA and higher 49 5.45 1.19 74.2%

53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 5.33 1.17 72.2%







STDDEV PERFORMANCE

SAT 1241 / ACT 28 and higher 6 5.50 0.99 75.0%

7 29.2% SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.47 0.89 74.5%







FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 9 // Learning: Technical Skills 56 5.45 1.18 74.2%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






FACTOR PERFORMANCE

N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 433 5.79 0.99 5.45 5.96 7/7 79.8%

Carnegie Class 728 5.77 1.18 5.10 6.89 18/23 79.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Q089 // Provide pain reduction measures 55 5.71 1.19 78.5%

Q087 // Provide physical support in preparationfor therapeutic procedures

55 5.56 1.33 76.0%

Q088 // Provide emotional support in preparationfor therapeutic procedures

55 5.45 1.28 74.2%

Q090 // Manage wounds 53 4.92 1.56 65.3%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

FACTOR 9 // Technical Skills






LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 77.2% 78.5% 80.6% 76.5% 74.2%

Mean 5.63 5.71 5.83 5.59 5.45




Q087 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Provide physical support in preparation for therapeutic procedures




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 429 5.88 1.13 5.56 6.10 7/7 81.3%

Carnegie Class 720 5.85 1.24 5.11 7.00 18/23 80.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.5% 1.6% 1.4% 7.5% 16.8% 39.9% 32.4%

Carnegie Class 1.3% 1.2% 1.7% 10.6% 15.5% 33.9% 35.9%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 77.8% 79.4% 80.3% 76.2% 76.1%

Mean 5.67 5.76 5.82 5.57 5.56

FACTOR 9 // Learning: Technical Skills // Q087



Q088 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Provide emotional support in preparation for therapeutic procedures




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 429 5.92 1.10 5.45 6.12 7/7 82.0%

Carnegie Class 722 5.90 1.26 5.10 7.00 20/23 81.7%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.5% 0.9% 2.1% 7.0% 14.9% 41.0% 33.6%

Carnegie Class 1.4% 1.0% 2.1% 9.5% 15.3% 32.3% 38.4%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 76.7% 77.9% 80.8% 76.7% 74.2%

Mean 5.60 5.68 5.85 5.60 5.45




Q089 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Provide pain reduction measures




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 425 6.04 1.07 5.71 6.30 7/7 84.0%

Carnegie Class 598 5.99 1.12 5.17 6.60 13/17 83.2%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.5% 0.9% 1.2% 5.6% 14.4% 37.6% 39.8%

Carnegie Class 0.3% 0.9% 1.7% 9.2% 14.2% 34.5% 39.2%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

2015

Performance 78.5%

Mean 5.71




Q090 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Manage wounds




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 420 5.34 1.36 4.92 5.58 7/7 72.3%

Carnegie Class 593 5.32 1.47 4.62 6.53 13/17 72.0%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 1.4% 3.1% 5.2% 13.3% 24.0% 33.1% 19.8%

Carnegie Class 1.4% 4.0% 7.1% 15.5% 20.4% 27.4% 24.1%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

2015

Performance 65.4%

Mean 4.92





Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Core Knowledge, in this section of reports.



FACTOR COMPOSITION

Core Knowledge // To what degree did the nursing program teach you to:

Q068 // Understand how health care delivery systems are organized

Q072 // Use appropriate technologies to assess patients

Q073 // Understand the effects of health policies on diverse populations

Q074 // Understand the global health care environment

Q075 // Incorporate knowledge of cost factors when delivering care

Q076 // Communicate with healthcare professionals to deliver high quality patient care

Q077 // Work with inter-professional teams

Q078 // Assess predictive factors that influence the health of patients

Q086 // Apply an ethical decision-making framework to clinical situations

Q092 // Assist patients to achieve a peaceful end of life

FACTOR 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge





Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Core Knowledge and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improvedirectly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.

FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge 58 5.45 0.99 74.2%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%



Q086 // Apply an ethical decision-making framework to clinical situations 57 5.86 1.08 81.0%

Q073 // Understand the effects of health policies on diverse populations 56 5.59 1.15 76.5%

Q076 // Communicate with healthcare professionals to deliver high quality patient care 57 5.54 1.14 75.7%

Q068 // Understand how health care delivery systems are organized 58 5.47 1.12 74.5%

Q072 // Use appropriate technologies to assess patients 57 5.46 1.34 74.3%

Q078 // Assess predictive factors that influence the health of patients 56 5.43 1.28 73.8%

Q075 // Incorporate knowledge of cost factors when delivering care 57 5.40 1.17 73.3%

Q077 // Work with inter-professional teams 57 5.40 1.32 73.3%

Q074 // Understand the global health care environment 56 5.27 1.19 71.2%

Q092 // Assist patients to achieve a peaceful end of life 54 5.20 1.54 70.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%










STDDEV PERFORMANCE

Male 7 5.47 0.52 74.5%

8 13.3% Female 51 5.44 1.04 74.0%




STDDEV PERFORMANCE

White 56 5.41 0.99 73.5%





STDDEV PERFORMANCE






STDDEV PERFORMANCE

3.00 GPA and higher 51 5.47 0.97 74.5%

53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 5.17 1.16 69.5%







STDDEV PERFORMANCE

SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.49 0.84 74.8%








FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge 58 5.45 0.99 74.2%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






FACTOR PERFORMANCE

N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 437 5.66 0.91 5.42 5.90 6/7 77.7%

Carnegie Class 817 5.75 1.07 4.91 6.78 21/24 79.2%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Q086 // Apply an ethical decision-makingframework to clinical situations

57 5.86 1.08 81.0%

Q073 // Understand the effects of health policieson diverse populations

56 5.59 1.15 76.5%

Q076 // Communicate with healthcareprofessionals to deliver high quality patient care

57 5.54 1.14 75.7%

Q068 // Understand how health care deliverysystems are organized

58 5.47 1.12 74.5%

Q072 // Use appropriate technologies to assesspatients

57 5.46 1.34 74.3%

Q078 // Assess predictive factors that influencethe health of patients

56 5.43 1.28 73.8%

Q075 // Incorporate knowledge of cost factorswhen delivering care

57 5.40 1.17 73.3%

Q077 // Work with inter-professional teams 57 5.40 1.32 73.3%

Q074 // Understand the global health careenvironment

56 5.27 1.19 71.2%

Q092 // Assist patients to achieve a peaceful endof life

54 5.20 1.54 70.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

FACTOR 10 // Core Knowledge






LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 76.1% 77.6% 79.9% 72.5% 74.1%

Mean 5.56 5.66 5.80 5.35 5.45




Q068 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Understand how health care delivery systems are organized




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 436 5.50 1.13 5.29 6.00 5/7 75.0%

Carnegie Class 815 5.67 1.20 4.82 6.79 19/24 77.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.2% 1.4% 3.2% 12.4% 27.8% 35.8% 19.3%

Carnegie Class 0.5% 1.0% 3.4% 12.0% 21.2% 34.4% 27.5%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 73.6% 75.0% 77.0% 70.6% 74.4%

Mean 5.42 5.50 5.62 5.24 5.47

FACTOR 10 // Learning: Core Knowledge // Q068



Q072 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Use appropriate technologies to assess patients




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 433 5.72 1.07 5.46 5.93 7/7 78.7%

Carnegie Class 727 5.65 1.29 4.95 6.86 18/23 77.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.2% 1.2% 2.1% 9.2% 19.6% 45.5% 22.2%

Carnegie Class 1.0% 2.0% 2.9% 12.5% 17.5% 35.6% 28.4%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 77.8% 77.2% 80.2% 75.6% 74.3%

Mean 5.67 5.63 5.81 5.54 5.46




Q073 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Understand the effects of health policies on diverse populations




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 434 5.66 1.16 5.44 6.00 6/7 77.7%

Carnegie Class 813 5.81 1.22 5.06 6.86 18/24 80.2%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.2% 1.8% 3.5% 9.2% 19.6% 42.4% 23.3%

Carnegie Class 0.6% 1.4% 2.8% 9.8% 17.7% 34.6% 33.1%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 76.4% 79.8% 84.2% 73.3% 76.5%

Mean 5.58 5.79 6.05 5.40 5.59




Q074 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Understand the global health care environment




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 432 5.47 1.24 5.15 6.00 6/7 74.5%

Carnegie Class 814 5.63 1.33 4.62 6.75 20/24 77.2%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.0% 2.8% 5.1% 11.6% 24.1% 35.4% 21.1%

Carnegie Class 1.4% 1.1% 3.8% 14.4% 17.1% 33.2% 29.0%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 76.0% 75.4% 80.6% 69.9% 71.1%

Mean 5.56 5.53 5.84 5.19 5.27




Q075 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Incorporate knowledge of cost factors when delivering care




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 432 5.30 1.35 4.74 5.71 5/7 71.7%

Carnegie Class 810 5.47 1.44 4.15 6.75 16/24 74.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.9% 2.8% 6.7% 14.4% 25.7% 29.2% 20.4%

Carnegie Class 2.0% 2.1% 5.2% 14.0% 18.8% 31.3% 26.8%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 75.3% 77.6% 81.1% 72.5% 73.4%

Mean 5.52 5.66 5.86 5.35 5.40




Q076 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Communicate with healthcare professionals to deliver high qualitypatient care




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 435 5.79 1.18 5.54 6.17 7/7 79.8%

Carnegie Class 812 5.81 1.25 4.90 6.86 19/24 80.2%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.5% 0.9% 2.8% 10.1% 18.9% 34.3% 32.6%

Carnegie Class 0.6% 1.8% 2.4% 11.2% 15.8% 33.8% 34.4%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 79.3% 77.6% 79.2% 71.1% 75.7%

Mean 5.76 5.66 5.75 5.27 5.54




Q077 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Work with inter-professional teams




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 431 5.72 1.20 5.40 5.95 7/7 78.7%

Carnegie Class 803 5.75 1.32 4.85 6.86 20/23 79.2%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.5% 0.9% 4.2% 9.5% 20.0% 35.5% 29.5%

Carnegie Class 1.2% 2.2% 2.9% 10.7% 16.6% 32.7% 33.7%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 75.0% 76.8% 77.1% 71.1% 73.4%

Mean 5.50 5.61 5.63 5.26 5.40




Q078 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Assess predictive factors that influence the health of patients




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 434 5.83 1.05 5.43 6.00 7/7 80.5%

Carnegie Class 811 5.88 1.14 5.20 6.79 20/24 81.3%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.0% 0.7% 2.8% 7.6% 19.1% 41.5% 28.3%

Carnegie Class 0.6% 0.7% 2.1% 9.8% 18.5% 33.8% 34.6%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 76.0% 80.7% 80.6% 71.6% 73.8%

Mean 5.56 5.84 5.84 5.30 5.43




Q086 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Apply an ethical decision-making framework to clinical situations




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 428 6.08 1.02 5.72 6.48 6/7 84.7%

Carnegie Class 807 6.13 1.09 5.45 7.00 18/24 85.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.2% 0.7% 1.2% 6.1% 12.6% 39.0% 40.2%

Carnegie Class 0.6% 0.7% 0.9% 6.8% 12.6% 32.3% 46.1%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 77.3% 81.1% 82.9% 78.4% 81.0%

Mean 5.64 5.87 5.97 5.70 5.86




Q092 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Assist patients to achieve a peaceful end of life




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 421 5.58 1.35 5.20 6.06 7/7 76.3%

Carnegie Class 786 5.73 1.40 4.74 6.79 19/22 78.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 1.0% 2.9% 4.5% 10.9% 19.0% 33.3% 28.5%

Carnegie Class 2.0% 2.0% 3.5% 10.8% 16.3% 28.9% 36.4%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 73.3% 75.0% 75.8% 70.6% 70.1%

Mean 5.40 5.50 5.55 5.24 5.20





Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Skyfactor provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Role Development, in this section of reports.



FACTOR COMPOSITION

Role Development // To what degree did your non-nursing courses enhance your ability to:

Q066 // Integrate theories and concepts from liberal education into nursing practice.

Q067 // Value the ideal of lifelong learning to support excellence in nursing practice.

Role Development // To what degree did the nursing program teach you to:

Q070 // Integrate theory to develop a foundation for practice

Q085 // Incorporate nursing standards into practice

FACTOR 11 // Learning: Role Development





Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Role Development and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improvedirectly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.

FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 11 // Learning: Role Development 58 5.00 1.05 66.7%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%



Q085 // Incorporate nursing standards into practice 56 5.93 0.98 82.2%

Q070 // Integrate theory to develop a foundation for practice 57 5.32 1.14 72.0%

Q067 // Value the ideal of lifelong learning to support excellence in nursing practice. 54 4.56 1.63 59.3%

Q066 // Integrate theories and concepts from liberal education into nursing practice. 54 4.20 1.63 53.3%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%










STDDEV PERFORMANCE

Female 51 5.05 1.09 67.5%

52 86.7% Male 7 4.68 0.65 61.3%




STDDEV PERFORMANCE

White 56 4.98 1.06 66.3%





STDDEV PERFORMANCE






STDDEV PERFORMANCE

3.00 GPA and higher 51 5.00 1.08 66.7%

53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 4.88 0.73 64.7%







STDDEV PERFORMANCE

SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 4.93 0.83 65.5%








FACTOR PERFORMANCE


Factor 11 // Learning: Role Development 58 5.00 1.05 66.7%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






FACTOR PERFORMANCE

N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 438 5.50 1.02 5.00 5.73 7/7 75.0%

Carnegie Class 819 5.62 1.14 4.58 6.56 22/24 77.0%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Q085 // Incorporate nursing standards intopractice

56 5.93 0.98 82.2%

Q070 // Integrate theory to develop a foundationfor practice

57 5.32 1.14 72.0%

Q067 // Value the ideal of lifelong learning tosupport excellence in nursing practice.

54 4.56 1.63 59.3%

Q066 // Integrate theories and concepts fromliberal education into nursing practice.

54 4.20 1.63 53.3%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%

FACTOR 11 // Role Development






LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 69.7% 71.6% 72.4% 64.7% 66.7%

Mean 5.18 5.30 5.34 4.88 5.00




Q066 // Liberal Education for Baccalaureate Generalist Nursing Practice // To what degree did your non-nursing courses enhance your ability to: Integrate theories and concepts from liberal education into nursingpractice.




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 429 4.82 1.59 4.20 5.14 7/7 63.7%

Carnegie Class 724 5.02 1.58 3.00 6.25 22/23 67.0%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 3.5% 8.6% 5.8% 19.3% 23.1% 26.6% 13.1%

Carnegie Class 4.8% 4.4% 5.1% 22.0% 20.6% 25.3% 17.9%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

50%

60%

70%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 60.1% 61.8% 59.9% 54.2% 53.4%

Mean 4.60 4.71 4.59 4.25 4.20

FACTOR 11 // Learning: Role Development // Q066



Q067 // Liberal Education for Baccalaureate Generalist Nursing Practice // To what degree did your non-nursing courses enhance your ability to: Value the ideal of lifelong learning to support excellence in nursingpractice.




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 426 5.23 1.56 4.56 5.58 7/7 70.5%

Carnegie Class 719 5.31 1.58 4.00 6.36 21/23 71.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 2.1% 6.6% 4.7% 15.0% 19.2% 29.1% 23.2%

Carnegie Class 3.4% 4.3% 5.2% 16.6% 18.0% 26.3% 26.4%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

50%

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 62.5% 66.2% 69.4% 56.6% 59.3%

Mean 4.75 4.97 5.16 4.40 4.56




Q070 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Integrate theory to develop a foundation for practice




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 434 5.74 1.08 5.32 6.00 7/7 79.0%

Carnegie Class 807 5.79 1.19 5.08 6.75 23/24 79.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.0% 1.2% 2.3% 9.7% 20.3% 41.9% 24.7%

Carnegie Class 0.5% 1.0% 2.9% 10.9% 18.5% 35.0% 31.2%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 77.8% 78.9% 79.7% 71.2% 71.9%

Mean 5.67 5.74 5.78 5.27 5.32




Q085 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Incorporate nursing standards into practice




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 435 6.18 0.93 5.90 6.48 6/7 86.3%

Carnegie Class 808 6.12 1.08 5.41 7.00 17/24 85.3%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.0% 0.5% 0.7% 5.3% 11.3% 38.6% 43.7%

Carnegie Class 0.1% 1.2% 1.0% 6.9% 12.3% 33.6% 44.9%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 78.5% 79.4% 80.6% 77.2% 82.1%

Mean 5.71 5.76 5.84 5.63 5.93





Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Benchworks provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Overall Satisfaction, in this section of reports.

This factor is an overall measure of the indicator, Satisfaction. If improving this indicator is a goal for your institution, actions should be targetedtoward the factors that are predictors of this indicator and their questions which are more tangible and more directly actionable.

Analysis for the scaled questions that compose this measure is provided in the section allowing for sufficient understanding. Through thisanalysis (i.e., current performance, and longitudinal trends), a thorough picture of the factor should emerge, however additional information canbe found in Skyfactor Benchworks’ Online Reports.

FACTOR COMPOSITION

Overall Satisfaction // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree:

Q100 // Would you recommend the nursing school to a close friend?

Q101 // Did the nursing school provide a positive academic experience?






Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Overall Satisfaction and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improvedirectly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.

FACTOR PERFORMANCE



0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%



Q101 // Did the nursing school provide a positive academic experience? 56 4.88 1.64 64.7%

Q100 // Would you recommend the nursing school to a close friend? 57 4.84 1.70 64.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%










STDDEV PERFORMANCE

Female 50 4.92 1.68 65.3%

52 86.7% Male 7 4.50 1.07 58.3%




STDDEV PERFORMANCE

White 55 4.84 1.63 64.0%





STDDEV PERFORMANCE






STDDEV PERFORMANCE

3.00 GPA and higher 50 4.99 1.49 66.5%

53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 3.58 2.03 43.0%







STDDEV PERFORMANCE

SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 4.68 1.64 61.3%








FACTOR PERFORMANCE



0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






FACTOR PERFORMANCE

N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 436 5.52 1.50 3.94 6.27 6/7 75.3%

Carnegie Class 813 5.73 1.52 4.41 6.86 20/24 78.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Q101 // Did the nursing school provide a positiveacademic experience?

56 4.88 1.64 64.7%

Q100 // Would you recommend the nursing schoolto a close friend?

57 4.84 1.70 64.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%







LONGITUDINAL TREND

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 75.0% 68.4% 76.8% 47.5% 64.5%

Mean 5.50 5.11 5.61 3.85 4.87




Q100 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Would yourecommend the nursing school to a close friend?




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 435 5.47 1.65 3.73 6.23 6/7 74.5%

Carnegie Class 812 5.70 1.65 4.22 6.86 21/24 78.3%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 3.4% 3.9% 6.9% 10.1% 13.6% 27.6% 34.5%

Carnegie Class 4.3% 2.9% 4.6% 10.8% 11.4% 22.4% 43.6%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 75.0% 68.4% 77.0% 45.1% 64.0%

Mean 5.50 5.11 5.62 3.71 4.84

FACTOR 12 // Overall Satisfaction // Q100



Q101 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Did thenursing school provide a positive academic experience?




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 434 5.57 1.43 4.16 6.30 6/7 76.2%

Carnegie Class 809 5.76 1.47 4.52 6.86 21/24 79.3%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 1.2% 3.2% 5.3% 11.8% 17.3% 29.3% 32.0%

Carnegie Class 2.1% 2.5% 4.9% 11.0% 12.9% 26.5% 40.1%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2013 2014 2015

Performance 76.6% 50.0% 64.6%

Mean 5.59 4.00 4.88

FACTOR 12 // Overall Satisfaction // Q101




Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Benchworks provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Overall Learning, in this section of reports.

This factor is an overall measure of the indicator, Learning. If improving this indicator is a goal for your institution, actions should be targetedtoward the factors that are predictors of this indicator and their questions which are more tangible and more directly actionable.


FACTOR COMPOSITION

Overall Learning // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree:

Q102 // Were you challenged to do your best academic work?

Q103 // Were you motivated to do your best academic work?

Q104 // Was the information you learned applicable to your future career?






Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Overall Learning and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult to improvedirectly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.

FACTOR PERFORMANCE



0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%



Q104 // Was the information you learned applicable to your future career? 56 5.89 1.14 81.5%

Q102 // Were you challenged to do your best academic work? 57 5.84 1.18 80.7%

Q103 // Were you motivated to do your best academic work? 57 5.54 1.45 75.7%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%










STDDEV PERFORMANCE

Female 50 5.82 1.13 80.3%

52 86.7% Male 7 5.38 0.93 73.0%




STDDEV PERFORMANCE

White 55 5.72 1.11 78.7%





STDDEV PERFORMANCE






STDDEV PERFORMANCE

3.00 GPA and higher 50 5.81 1.11 80.2%

53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 5.17 0.98 69.5%







STDDEV PERFORMANCE

SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.43 1.14 73.8%








FACTOR PERFORMANCE



0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






FACTOR PERFORMANCE

N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 436 5.95 1.05 5.48 6.22 6/7 82.5%

Carnegie Class 813 6.06 1.15 5.36 6.93 19/24 84.3%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Q104 // Was the information you learnedapplicable to your future career?

56 5.89 1.14 81.5%

Q102 // Were you challenged to do your bestacademic work?

57 5.84 1.18 80.7%

Q103 // Were you motivated to do your bestacademic work?

57 5.54 1.45 75.7%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%







LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2013 2014 2015

Performance 85.6% 74.1% 79.4%

Mean 6.14 5.44 5.77




Q102 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Were youchallenged to do your best academic work?




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 435 5.98 1.17 5.59 6.23 6/7 83.0%

Carnegie Class 807 6.05 1.28 5.34 7.00 17/24 84.2%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.5% 1.1% 2.3% 7.1% 15.9% 31.0% 42.1%

Carnegie Class 1.2% 1.4% 2.4% 6.8% 13.4% 25.0% 49.8%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2013 2014 2015

Performance 85.1% 75.5% 80.7%

Mean 6.11 5.53 5.84

FACTOR 13 // Overall Learning // Q102



Q103 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Were youmotivated to do your best academic work?




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 433 5.75 1.37 4.98 6.14 6/7 79.2%

Carnegie Class 734 5.88 1.36 5.18 6.79 18/23 81.3%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.9% 2.8% 4.8% 7.9% 15.0% 32.8% 35.8%

Carnegie Class 1.4% 1.9% 3.8% 9.0% 12.4% 29.5% 42.1%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

90%

2013 2014 2015

Performance 83.3% 65.9% 75.7%

Mean 6.00 4.95 5.54




Q104 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Was theinformation you learned applicable to your future career?




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 427 6.11 1.04 5.87 6.50 6/7 85.2%

Carnegie Class 807 6.19 1.19 5.52 7.00 19/24 86.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.0% 0.7% 1.9% 6.3% 11.9% 34.7% 44.5%

Carnegie Class 0.9% 1.2% 1.3% 6.7% 10.1% 26.2% 53.7%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

80%

90%

2013 2014 2015

Performance 88.0% 80.6% 81.5%

Mean 6.28 5.84 5.89





Factors, a composite of scaled questions that explain a larger concept, are utilized in Skyfactor Benchworks’ reporting to reduce complexity andstrengthen the analysis. Benchworks provides an in-depth analysis of the factor, Overall Program Effectiveness, in this section of reports.

This factor is an overall measure of the indicator, Overall. If improving this indicator is a goal for your institution, actions should be targetedtoward the factors that are predictors of this indicator and their questions which are more tangible and more directly actionable.


FACTOR COMPOSITION

Overall Program Effectiveness // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree:

Q100 // Would you recommend the nursing school to a close friend?

Q101 // Did the nursing school provide a positive academic experience?

Q102 // Were you challenged to do your best academic work?

Q103 // Were you motivated to do your best academic work?

Q104 // Was the information you learned applicable to your future career?

Overall Program Effectiveness //

Q105 // Comparing the expense to the quality of your education, rate the value of the investment made in your degree.






Factor Performance // AggregateBelow is your institution's current performance for Overall Program Effectiveness and its scaled questions. While this factor might be difficult toimprove directly, improving its scaled questions will likely be easier and will result in an improvement in the factor.

FACTOR PERFORMANCE



0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%



Q104 // Was the information you learned applicable to your future career? 56 5.89 1.14 81.5%

Q102 // Were you challenged to do your best academic work? 57 5.84 1.18 80.7%

Q103 // Were you motivated to do your best academic work? 57 5.54 1.45 75.7%

Q105 // Comparing the expense to the quality of your education, rate the value of theinvestment made in your degree.

57 5.19 1.30 69.8%

Q101 // Did the nursing school provide a positive academic experience? 56 4.88 1.64 64.7%

Q100 // Would you recommend the nursing school to a close friend? 57 4.84 1.70 64.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%










STDDEV PERFORMANCE

Female 50 5.43 1.21 73.8%

52 86.7% Male 7 4.98 0.87 66.3%




STDDEV PERFORMANCE

White 55 5.33 1.19 72.2%





STDDEV PERFORMANCE






STDDEV PERFORMANCE

3.00 GPA and higher 50 5.44 1.14 74.0%

53 89.8% Below 3.00 GPA 6 4.61 1.30 60.2%







STDDEV PERFORMANCE

SAT 1240 / ACT 27 and below 17 5.07 1.21 67.8%








FACTOR PERFORMANCE



0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%






FACTOR PERFORMANCE

N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 436 5.67 1.12 4.73 6.15 6/7 77.8%

Carnegie Class 815 5.85 1.21 4.90 6.89 20/24 80.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


SELECT 6CARNEGIE

CLASSALL


Q104 // Was the information you learnedapplicable to your future career?

56 5.89 1.14 81.5%

Q102 // Were you challenged to do your bestacademic work?

57 5.84 1.18 80.7%

Q103 // Were you motivated to do your bestacademic work?

57 5.54 1.45 75.7%

Q105 // Comparing the expense to the quality ofyour education, rate the value of the investmentmade in your degree.

57 5.19 1.30 69.8%

Q101 // Did the nursing school provide a positiveacademic experience?

56 4.88 1.64 64.7%

Q100 // Would you recommend the nursing schoolto a close friend?

57 4.84 1.70 64.0%

0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%







LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 70.5% 68.0% 81.1% 62.3% 72.9%

Mean 5.23 5.08 5.86 4.74 5.37




Q100 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Would yourecommend the nursing school to a close friend?




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 435 5.47 1.65 3.73 6.23 6/7 74.5%

Carnegie Class 812 5.70 1.65 4.22 6.86 21/24 78.3%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 3.4% 3.9% 6.9% 10.1% 13.6% 27.6% 34.5%

Carnegie Class 4.3% 2.9% 4.6% 10.8% 11.4% 22.4% 43.6%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 75.0% 68.4% 77.0% 45.1% 64.0%

Mean 5.50 5.11 5.62 3.71 4.84

FACTOR 14 // Overall Program Effectiveness // Q100



Q101 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Did thenursing school provide a positive academic experience?




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 434 5.57 1.43 4.16 6.30 6/7 76.2%

Carnegie Class 809 5.76 1.47 4.52 6.86 21/24 79.3%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 1.2% 3.2% 5.3% 11.8% 17.3% 29.3% 32.0%

Carnegie Class 2.1% 2.5% 4.9% 11.0% 12.9% 26.5% 40.1%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

2013 2014 2015

Performance 76.6% 50.0% 64.6%

Mean 5.59 4.00 4.88




Q102 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Were youchallenged to do your best academic work?




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 435 5.98 1.17 5.59 6.23 6/7 83.0%

Carnegie Class 807 6.05 1.28 5.34 7.00 17/24 84.2%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.5% 1.1% 2.3% 7.1% 15.9% 31.0% 42.1%

Carnegie Class 1.2% 1.4% 2.4% 6.8% 13.4% 25.0% 49.8%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2013 2014 2015

Performance 85.1% 75.5% 80.7%

Mean 6.11 5.53 5.84




Q103 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Were youmotivated to do your best academic work?




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 433 5.75 1.37 4.98 6.14 6/7 79.2%

Carnegie Class 734 5.88 1.36 5.18 6.79 18/23 81.3%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.9% 2.8% 4.8% 7.9% 15.0% 32.8% 35.8%

Carnegie Class 1.4% 1.9% 3.8% 9.0% 12.4% 29.5% 42.1%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

90%

2013 2014 2015

Performance 83.3% 65.9% 75.7%

Mean 6.00 4.95 5.54




Q104 // Overall Evaluation // Regarding your experience at the nursing school, to what degree: Was theinformation you learned applicable to your future career?




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 427 6.11 1.04 5.87 6.50 6/7 85.2%

Carnegie Class 807 6.19 1.19 5.52 7.00 19/24 86.5%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.0% 0.7% 1.9% 6.3% 11.9% 34.7% 44.5%

Carnegie Class 0.9% 1.2% 1.3% 6.7% 10.1% 26.2% 53.7%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

80%

90%

2013 2014 2015

Performance 88.0% 80.6% 81.5%

Mean 6.28 5.84 5.89




Q105 // Overall Evaluation Comparing the expense to the quality of your education, rate the value of theinvestment made in your degree.




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 436 5.13 1.36 4.11 5.70 4/7 68.8%

Carnegie Class 806 5.51 1.45 4.11 6.86 16/24 75.2%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 1.1% 2.5% 9.2% 17.4% 24.1% 30.3% 15.4%

Carnegie Class 1.3% 2.1% 6.7% 14.7% 18.0% 25.8% 31.4%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

50%

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 66.0% 67.5% 76.1% 56.2% 69.9%

Mean 4.96 5.05 5.57 4.37 5.19




Q027 // To what degree: Are you experiencing stress regarding paying off your student loans




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 327 3.46 1.86 3.00 3.82 4/6 41.0%

Carnegie Class 484 3.51 1.78 3.00 4.67 11/18 41.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY

EXTREMELY ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- NOT AT ALL

1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 19.3% 17.1% 14.7% 21.1% 11.3% 8.3% 8.3%

Carnegie Class 20.0% 12.1% 13.8% 29.1% 10.2% 7.7% 7.2%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

30%

40%

2014 2015


Mean 3.07 3.26

Non-Factor Questions // Q027


2014-15 AACN/Benchworks Undergraduate Nursing Education Exit Assessment // Indiana University East Non-Factor Questions // 1©2015 Skyfactor. Survey report may not be reproduced without permission

Q028 // To what degree: Do you anticipate problems making your student loan payments




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 325 4.93 1.72 4.32 5.74 4/6 65.5%

Carnegie Class 484 5.06 1.66 4.25 6.33 13/18 67.7%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY

EXTREMELY ---------------------------------- MODERATELY ---------------------------------- NOT AT ALL

1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 5.2% 5.8% 7.4% 20.9% 13.5% 26.8% 20.3%

Carnegie Class 5.1% 3.8% 6.0% 22.6% 17.9% 20.4% 24.2%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

2014 2015


Mean 4.65 4.67




Q036 // Quality of Nursing Instruction // Rate the quality of the BSN program regarding: Extent to which yoursenior clinical experience built on the foundation laid in previous nursing courses




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 431 5.50 1.29 5.17 6.08 5/7 75.0%

Carnegie Class 736 5.30 1.44 3.98 6.67 13/23 71.7%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.5% 0.7% 6.5% 14.8% 23.0% 27.1% 27.4%

Carnegie Class 2.3% 2.4% 6.2% 15.8% 21.1% 30.1% 22.2%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 76.0% 69.8% 67.1% 67.4% 70.8%

Mean 5.56 5.19 5.03 5.05 5.25




Q093 // Basic Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Care and Patient Safety // To what degreedid the nursing program teach you to: Delegate nursing care while retaining accountability




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 423 5.77 1.25 5.45 6.26 7/7 79.5%

Carnegie Class 790 5.88 1.28 5.00 7.00 21/24 81.3%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.9% 2.1% 2.8% 7.1% 18.2% 37.8% 31.0%

Carnegie Class 1.1% 1.4% 3.0% 9.1% 16.1% 30.2% 39.2%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

70%

80%

90%

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Performance 75.9% 80.1% 79.5% 73.0% 74.2%

Mean 5.56 5.81 5.77 5.38 5.45




Q095 // Online Environment // To what degree did the online course/technology provide: Easy-to-usesoftware




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 265 5.39 1.20 4.76 5.69 4/6 73.2%

Carnegie Class 368 5.48 1.29 4.29 6.75 9/15 74.7%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.4% 0.8% 3.8% 21.5% 21.1% 33.2% 19.2%

Carnegie Class 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 18.1% 20.6% 30.8% 24.6%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

2014 2015


Mean 5.11 5.26




Q096 // Online Environment // To what degree did the online course/technology provide: Software that wasfunctional




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 264 5.35 1.18 4.68 5.66 3/6 72.5%

Carnegie Class 366 5.44 1.28 4.43 6.75 9/15 74.0%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 0.4% 1.5% 3.4% 18.9% 25.0% 34.5% 16.3%

Carnegie Class 0.5% 2.2% 3.2% 17.5% 23.2% 29.9% 23.4%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

2014 2015


Mean 5.17 5.46




Q097 // Online Environment // To what degree did the online course/technology provide: Interaction betweenyou and your instructor




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 268 5.29 1.36 4.52 5.71 4/7 71.5%

Carnegie Class 367 5.43 1.52 4.42 7.00 10/16 73.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 1.9% 1.9% 5.6% 16.0% 24.6% 31.0% 19.0%

Carnegie Class 2.0% 4.2% 4.0% 14.7% 17.7% 27.9% 29.6%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

60%

70%

80%

2014 2015


Mean 4.81 5.54




Q098 // Online Environment // To what degree did the online course/technology provide: Interaction amongclassmates




N MEANSTDDEV

MEAN RANGE



Select 6 265 5.27 1.40 4.60 5.65 4/7 71.2%

Carnegie Class 367 5.43 1.51 4.46 7.00 11/16 73.8%


0 ------ PERFORMANCE ------ 100%


ANSWER FREQUENCY


1 // 2 // 3 // 4 // 5 // 6 // 7 //


Select 6 2.3% 2.3% 6.8% 13.2% 24.5% 32.1% 18.9%

Carnegie Class 2.0% 3.7% 4.2% 16.0% 17.0% 29.2% 27.9%


0 ----- % RESPONDENTS ----- 100%


LONGITUDINAL TREND

50%

60%

70%

80%

2014 2015


Mean 4.59 5.29




Indiana University East€¦ · benchmarking), between successive years (longitudinal...

Documents

Transcript of Indiana University East€¦ · benchmarking), between successive years (longitudinal...