Inadvertent biological control: an Australian thrips killing an invasive New Zealand tree in...
Transcript of Inadvertent biological control: an Australian thrips killing an invasive New Zealand tree in...
ORIGINAL PAPER
Inadvertent biological control: an Australian thrips killingan invasive New Zealand tree in California
Jon J. Sullivan
Received: 13 December 2011 / Accepted: 26 July 2013 / Published online: 24 August 2013
� Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013
Abstract Transport hubs of international trade and
tourism are sites of unprecedented long-distance
dispersal of species and novel ecological interactions.
In cases of invasive plants released from their
specialist natural enemies, novel interactions with
both resident enemies and new arrivals can accumu-
late and potentially reduce weed competitiveness. I
present here one dramatic example of this, where an
invasive woody weed in southern California is being
rapidly controlled by an accidentally introduced
genus-specialist herbivorous insect. The New Zealand
native shrub/small tree, Myoporum laetum, is a long-
time popular ornamental plant in California and has
become an invasive woody weed. In 2005, a Myopo-
rum-specific thrips, Klambothrips myopori, was dis-
covered (and described) in California feeding on M.
laetum leaves. Several searches have failed to find K.
myopori in New Zealand and a population has recently
been discovered in Tasmania, Australia, feeding on
Myoporum insulare. In 5 years, K. myopori has killed
off about half of southern Californian M. laetum with
almost all surviving individuals being gradually
defoliated. Inadequate border biosecurity has resulted
in inadvertent biological control, in a rapid timeframe,
caused by a novel enemy. Unfortunately, K. myopori
has subsequently been accidentally transported from
California to Hawaii where it is now killing off
Hawaiian native Myoporum sandwicense. Transport
hubs can both connect weeds with natural enemies and
disperse those enemies more widely.
Keywords Enemy release hypothesis �Invasion biology � Myoporaceae � Plant–insect
interactions � Phlaeothripidae
Introduction
Species invasions lead to novel species interactions,
often with unexpected ecological consequences for
both native and naturalised populations (e.g. Chittka
and Schurkens 2001; Power and Mitchell 2004;
Carvalheiro et al. 2008). Novel interactions and
reunited host–enemy interactions can also accumulate
over time and potentially decrease the competitiveness
of invasive species (Hawkes 2007; Diez et al. 2010). I
describe here the unexpected, dramatic decline in
southern Californian populations of the New Zealand
endemic ngaio, Myoporum laetum (Myoporaceae), an
invasive woody weed in coastal Californian wildlands
(Bossard et al. 2000). Ngaio was one of only 13 weeds
of coastal California highlighted in the ‘‘Plant Right’’
programme of California Horticultural Invasives Pre-
vention (2005). Its rapid decline has been driven by the
accidental introduction and sustained population
J. J. Sullivan (&)
Department of Ecology, Lincoln University, PO Box 84,
Lincoln 7647, New Zealand
e-mail: [email protected];
123
Biol Invasions (2014) 16:445–453
DOI 10.1007/s10530-013-0532-x
outbreak of a Myoporum-specific herbivorous thrips
(Mound and Morris 2007). It serves as an example of
inadvertent (fortuitous) biological control via a new
host association, and highlights both the biocontrol
opportunities and dangers of ongoing insect move-
ments via international trade.
To understand the full context and implications of
this case study, it is useful to briefly review the
invasion of its host, M. laetum, into California. As is
often the case with ornamentally sourced wildland
weeds, ngaio (also called ‘‘New Zealand myoporum’’
in California) was a popular, widely planted orna-
mental for several decades before producing invasive
wild populations. Ngaio was one of several New
Zealand woody species planted ornamentally in Cal-
ifornia by the 1860s (McClintock and Turner 2001).
New Zealand plants, including ngaio, gained sub-
stantial exposure at the Panama Pacific International
Exposition in San Francisco in 1915 (McClintock and
Turner 2001), with the associated publication of New
Zealand plants suitable for North American gardens
by Cockayne (1914).
Ngaio was widely planted in coastal California
especially throughout the 1950s to 1970s (Pool 2002;
Sullivan 2004). It was one of ‘‘a very few trees’’
planted widely along San Francisco streets in the late
1960s and 1970s (Sullivan 2004, p. 9), and in 2002 was
still the 18th most abundant street tree in that city
(Maco et al. 2003). A popular garden book of the
western USA describes ngaio as having ‘‘exception-
ally fast growth’’ and being ‘‘superb for seaside use’’
(Brenzel 1995, p. 385). Ngaio is listed among the 150
ornamental street tree species used by the City of Los
Angeles Bureau of Street Services (2009) and has been
widely planted along highways throughout southern
California (Pool 2002; Mound and Morris 2007).
While ngaio is no longer a species of choice for
highway planting (Pool 2002) or street planting in San
Francisco (Sullivan 2004), it remains an abundant
species planted throughout much of coastal California.
The great bulk of M. laetum in California is, or
originates from, the popular cultivar M. laetum
‘Carsonii’. Pressed specimens of the original San
Diego parent, collected in 1968, were lodged in the
Allan Herbarium (CHR), Lincoln, New Zealand
(specimen CHR 239205) and later determined as M.
laetum by New Zealand botanist W. R. Sykes. The
specimen label recounts that plants were bred by
Stanley R. Carson, Pacific Beach, California and
released to the trade in 1951 as Myoporum Carsonii. It
has also been listed by nurseries as M. Carsonii, M.
laetum carsonii and M. ‘Carsoni’.
Wild populations have arisen from planted ngaio
throughout much of costal California, from Sonoma
County (38� north) to San Diego county (32� north)
(Kitz 2006). It has also naturalised in the Baja
California peninsula of Mexico (Harris 1998). Ngaio
can form dense monocultures, shading out competing
plants (Kitz 2006). The accumulation of dead wood in
the interior of the plant can also be a fire risk (Bossard
et al. 2000). While being ‘‘surprisingly drought
tolerant’’ (Kitz 2006), it is predominantly found in
coastal areas, woodlands, and riparian areas (Califor-
nia Invasive Plant Council 2006), and has been a
successful invader of the few remaining coastal
wetlands of southern California (Kitz 2006). Large
plants must typically be controlled with herbicide
since ngaio resprouts after cutting or fire and its leaves
are toxic to mammals due to a furanoid sesquiterpene
ketone in the oil glands (Kitz 2006).
In 2005, an unidentified species of thrips was first
found attacking the foliage of ngaio in Orange County,
southern California (Downer 2006; Mound and Morris
2007). This species was subsequently described as
Klambothrips myopori of the Phlaeothripidae (Mound
and Morris 2007). The 44 specimens used by Mound
and Morris (2007) were collected in 2006, from three
sites in Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego Counties.
By 2008, K. myopori had reached San Francisco Bay
area. In 3 years from its first detection, K. myopori was
present at sites spanning over 750 km, a rapid spread
rate perhaps facilitated by human dispersal of nursery
material.
Until recently, K. myopori was only known from
California, although it has an undescribed, morpho-
logically similar and molecularly distinct sibling
species in south-eastern Australia, that feeds on
Myoporum insulare (Mound and Morris 2007; Mound
2008). To date, K. myopori has been reported feeding
on M. laetum, including the popular cultivar M. laetum
‘Carsonii’, and a creeping ornamental hybrid, Myo-
porum ‘Pacificum’. Regrettably, by March 2009 it had
also now reached Hawaii where it is feeding on and
killing the Hawaiian native prostrate Myoporum
sandwicense (Conant et al. 2009). Mound and Morris
(2007) and Mound (2008) speculated that K. myopori
may be a New Zealand native species based on its
abundance on M. laetum in California. However, there
446 J. J. Sullivan
123
are no published records of herbivorous thrips feeding
on M. laetum in New Zealand (Didham and Pawson
2011; Martin 2009), and this is supported by
subsequent targeted searching (Ross Beever, Jenny
Dymock, Richard Hill, Nicholas Martin, and Jon
Sullivan, unpublished data). In 2011, after much
searching, Laurence Mound and Stephen Cameron
(CSIRO, unpublished data) discovered a population of
K. myopori feeding on M. insulare in Tasmania,
Australia (1,500 km from New Zealand).
I had the opportunity to visit a coastal area of
Orange County, southern California, eight times
between late 1997 and 2011. Ngaio is a common
plant in this area, both planted and wild. When I first
visited, the ngaio were healthy plants. By 2009, almost
all plants were infested by K. myopori and by 2011
almost half of the plants were dead. In this paper, I
describe this rapid dieback of ngaio caused by the
invasion of K. myopori. It is a dramatic example of the
unexpected ecological consequences of mixing new
species in new ranges.
Methods
Invasion and impacts of K. myopori in southern
California
In February 2009, I surveyed the extent of Klambothr-
ips defoliation on M. laetum plants at three sites in
Orange County: lower San Gabriel River area between
the East Pacific Coast Highway and State Route 22
(WGS84 33.76�N 118.09�W), Bolsa Chica Ecological
Reserve (Huntington Beach, 33.70�N 118.04�W), and
the Upper Newport Bay Nature Preserve and Ecolog-
ical Reserve (33.65�N 117.87�W). All sites are\20 m
in elevation and\7 km from the coast. In the lower San
Gabriel River area, M. laetum is the dominant woody
plant of highway roadside plantings and wild plants are
scattered in neighbouring abandoned wasteland areas.
Wild M. laetum are on the margins and higher grounds
of both wetland sites, originating from nearby
plantings.
At the first two sites, I used photos I had taken
during visits prior to 2005 to assess changes in plant
health after K. myopori arrival. For the Upper Newport
Bay site, I compared plants in 2009 with photos from
my only previous visit in January 2007, when K.
myopori herbivory was already present on some
plants. For all sites, I also compared my 2009 ground
survey data to satellite and aerial images, using dated
images from TerraServer (http://terraserver-usa.com/,
images dated 29 March 2004) and Google Earth
(http://earth.google.com/). Plants dead in 2009 but
alive in earlier satellite imagery were included in my
annual mortality estimates.
I scored all plants in the surveyed areas for
presence of K. myopori, plant height and maximum
width, and visually scored each plant for the propor-
tion of canopy shoots with live foliage, assigned to the
following categories: 100 % live foliage, 75–\100 %,
50–\75 %, 25–\50 %, [0–\25 %, and 0 %. Plants
with 0 % live canopy foliage and no live basal shoots
or suckers were considered dead. The reproductive
state (flowering or fruiting) was recorded for a subset
of 88 San Gabriel plants. In total, 313 plants were
surveyed from the San Gabriel River area, 81 plants
from the Upper Newport Bay Nature Preserve, and
four plants from the Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve
(where weed control had removed most M. laetum
prior to 2009).
I dissected out all thrips from the shoots of two
haphazardly selected branches from two well-infested
trees, one sampled from Bolsa Chica on 19 February
2009 (85 mm 9 81 mm 9 70 mm), and the other
from the San Gabriel River area on 23 February 2009
(154 mm 9 144 mm 9 135 mm). This was done to
better assess the extent to which K. myopori feeding
was directly causing the leaf contortions and shoot
defoliation (rather than associated disease). It was
evident that the contorted shoot tips were associated
with K. myopori. To confirm this association, for a
random subset of 9 shoots (75 leaves) I counted K.
myopori per leaf and recorded the node of each leaf
and whether it was fully contorted, partially contorted,
or not contorted from K. myopori feeding. I also used
the Bolsa Chica samples to run a preliminary assess-
ment of the tolerance of K. myopori nymphs and adults
to freezing, by placing the branch that I dissected first
in a domestic freezer overnight (at about -8 �C) while
I retained another sampled branch of similar size in the
fridge. I also searched for the presence of potential
enemies of K. myopori, standardising this search in
2010 and 2011 to the most contorted leaf from each of
ten randomly selected accessible shoots from each of
the accessible 313 San Gabriel plants.
To assess the wider distribution of K. myopori on
M. laetum, in August 2011 I did a series of roadside
Inadvertent biocontrol of NZ plant by Australian insect in USA 447
123
surveys recording the presence/absence of M. laetum
and the presence/absence of partially or wholly K.
myopori defoliated plants for every mile (as measured
with the car’s odometer) along 141 miles of highway
between Upper Newport Bay in the south and La
Conchita (34.36�N–119.44�W) to the north.
Results were analysed in R (R Development Core
Team 2011) using binomial generalised linear models
(GLMs) and proportional odds models. None of the
binomial models were over-dispersed. For multivar-
iate models, presented P values are for their respective
treatments added last to the model. Data are available
from the Dryad Digital Repository at http://dx.doi.org/
10.5061/dryad.f4392.
Results
Invasion and impacts of K. myopori in southern
California
I first observed K. myopori and its distinctive leaf
contorting damage (Fig. 1) in December 2006–Janu-
ary 2007 in the three Orange County coastal sites I
visited. It was absent from the lower San Gabriel River
area and Bolsa Chica in my previous visit in Novem-
ber–December 2003 and all of my earlier visits to
these sites (January 2007 was my first visit to the
Upper Newport Bay Nature Preserve). This is consis-
tent with the earliest published records from 2005
Mound and Morris (2007). By 2009, there was
extensive M. laetum dieback through much of coastal
southern California (Figs. 2, 3, M. Hoddle, pers.
comm.). In my 141 mile roadside transect in 2011,
M. laetum was present along 76 miles. This included
54 of the 76 miles within 5 km of the coast. The plants
in every mile showed dieback consistent with Klam-
bothrips feeding, with one exception (a lone roadside
shelter belt in the middle of open farmland outside of
Oxnard). The heaviest damage and most dead trees
were along the Pacific Coast highway through Malibu.
Of the 398 plants I surveyed, 48.2 % were without
live shoots and presumed dead by 2011 and 37.8 % had
\25 % of their canopy with live shoots (Table 1). Of
the 206 plants still alive in 2011, 99 % had K. myopori
damage, 92.3 % with K. myopori damage on more
than 75 % of their live shoots. Almost no heavily
defoliated plants (\25 % of canopy with live foliage)
Fig. 1 Typical views of M. laetum canopies infested with K. myopori
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Year
Pro
port
ion
of p
lant
s
Plants alive
>50% shoots alive
>50% shoots with Klambothrips
Fig. 2 The decline in M. laetum associated with K. myopori
invasion at three sites in Orange County, California
448 J. J. Sullivan
123
were flowering or fruiting (binomial GLM comparing
with less defoliated plants and accounting for variation
in plant volume: df = 1.58, deviance = 4.5, residual
deviance = 63.9, P \ 0.05). In the San Gabriel River
area, only 12 % of plants with\25 % of their canopy
with live shoots were reproductive, while 45 % of the
plants with [50 % of their canopy with live shoots
were reproductive.
Plant size in the San Gabriel River area, as
measured by estimated canopy volume, influenced
the extent of defoliation (proportional odds model,
volume model compared with intercept only model:
df = 1, likelihood ratio = 16.45, P \ 0.001). Larger
plants were also least likely to be dead (binomial
GLM: df = 1.125, deviance = 28.5, residual
deviance = 146.2, P \ 0.001). However, many large
trees were still among the dead, with 32.3 % of trees
over 4 m high dead and of the remaining large live
trees, 33.3 % had \25 % of their canopy with live
shoots (N = 62).
While mortality was generally high, it did differ
among sites. By 2011, mortality was lower at the
Upper Newport Bay Nature Preserve (38.3 %) than in
the San Gabriel River area (51.1 %) (Table 1, bino-
mial GLM: df = 1.392, deviance = 4.3, residual
deviance = 541.5, P \ 0.05). The cause of this
difference is unclear. The Upper Newport Bay Nature
Preserve had a higher proportion of younger, wild
plants than the San Gabriel River area, which was
dominated by old highway plantings (although in
Fig. 3 Three plants photographed before and after the effects of
sustained heavy K. myopori herbivory. The upper plant was
photographed near State Route 22 in the lower San Gabriel
River area, initially prior to the arrival of K. myopori. The lower
two plants were photographed in the Upper Newport Bay,
initially shortly after the arrival of K. myopori
Inadvertent biocontrol of NZ plant by Australian insect in USA 449
123
many cases the origin of plants was uncertain). There
was very little recruitment over this same period and
seedlings (and root suckers) were as heavily damaged
by Klambothrips as larger plants.
Curiously, two nearby San Gabriel plants remained
almost entirely undamaged by K. myopori throughout the
surveys, despite being within 160 m of defoliated and
dead plants. The reproductive and vegetative characters
fell within the morphological variation of the local
M. laetum. One of the two plants, especially, sustained
scale insect colonies guarded by thousands of ants.
The branch dissections revealed the extent of the K.
myopori outbreak on M. laetum. The dissected San
Gabriel River area branch end contained 176 K.
myopori adults, 312 nymphs, and about 2,700 eggs,
from just 92 leaves, 78 of which were contorted from
thrips feeding. The Bolsa Chica branch end contained
21 K. myopori adults, 134 nymphs, and at least 256
eggs, from 105 leaves, 82 of which were contorted
from thrips feeding. Only 33 other individual inver-
tebrates were found from the two samples, including
12 black aphids from two leaves, 7 ants, 9 soft scales
from 5 leaves, one mite, one mealy bug, and one small
beetle. Mark Hoddle (unpublished data) has found a
low incidence of predatory pirate bugs (Orius sp.,
Hemiptera, Anthocoridae) and green lacewing larvae
(Neuroptera, Chrysopidae) from galled leaves at
Riverside. The overnight freezing killed all K. myo-
pori adults and nymphs in the Bolsa Chica sample
while all adults and nymphs from the refrigerated
control branch survived.
I estimated with Photoshop that the sampled San
Gabriel River area tree (5.5 m high, 8 m wide) had at
least 2,200 branch ends of the size I sampled. All
branch ends on the tree had leaves contorted by K.
myopori feeding, almost all still with live foliage
(placing it in the 75–\100 % live foliage category).
Extrapolating my counts from the one dissected
branch end gives a rough estimate of over a million
K. myopori adults and nymphs and over 5 million eggs
on this one tree. While an uncertain estimate, it
underscores K. myopori feeding as a sufficient sole
cause of the canopy dieback.
Both K. myopori individuals and damage were
concentrated on the apical leaves of shoots (Binomial
GLM of K. myopori presence: df = 1.72, devi-
ance = 21.5, residual deviance = 76.2, P \ 0.001;
K. myopori damage: df = 1.72, deviance = 6.4,
residual deviance = 73.7, P \ 0.05). Over half
(55 %) of the leaves had K. myopori adults, nymphs,
or eggs present, and most leaves were partially (19 %)
or fully (72 %) contorted. The upper three leaves of
shoots had 80 % of the K. myopori nymphs and adults
and only 19 % of the partially or undamaged leaves
(with shoots having 4–12 leaves, mean 8.3). It is
unclear whether the lower probability of K. myopori
damage to basal leaves in these February 2009
samples reflects a seasonal fluctuation in K. myopori
abundance or whether these lower leaves pre-date K.
myopori arrival on these trees. Adults and nymphs of
K. myopori were still present feeding in August 2010
(and 2011), suggesting the latter.
Discussion
This is certainly not the first case of dramatic
ecological consequences resulting from a novel com-
bination of insect herbivore and host plant, both
unintentional (e.g., Elkinton and Liebhold 1990; van
Epenhuijsen et al. 2000; Stadler et al. 2006) and
through classical biological control (e.g., McFadyen
1998; Carruthers et al. 2011). However, these are
typically of invasive insects meeting new host plants
in the plants’ native ranges, or of natural enemies
being reunited with their host plants in new ranges.
Myoporum laetum meeting K. myopori is a case of a
genus-specialist insect herbivore meeting a new
species of its host genus in a new environment. It
clearly illustrates the potential impact of new
Table 1 The percentage of plants in different canopy defoli-
ation categories in summer 2011 at two sites in Orange County,
southern California (N = 313 plants from the San Gabriel
River area between the East Pacific Coast Highway and State
Route 22, and N = 81 from the Upper Newport Bay Nature
Preserve and Ecological Reserve)
Defoliation (%) San Gabriel (%) Newport Bay (%)
0–\25 14.8 35.8
25–\50 5.5 11.1
50–\75 9.3 2.5
75–\100 14.3 12.3
100 56 38.3
Past photographs and Terraserver satellite images show that all
these plants were alive and healthy in 2004, in the 100 % or
75–\100 % categories. All live plants except for one Newport
Bay plant had K. myopori damage, usually throughout the
canopy
450 J. J. Sullivan
123
associations between herbivores with host plants, as
has been demonstrated by some classical control
programmes (e.g., Zimmermann et al. 2001; van
Klinken et al. 2003; McConnachie et al. 2004). It is
also hard to imagine how it could have been predicted
that a previously unknown and uncommon Tasmanian
insect would cause a mass dieback of a New Zealand
native plant in California.
It is perhaps notable that this meeting occurred in
southern California, a major hub of international trade
more than 12,800 km away from the native range of
both species, and not in New Zealand, 1,500 km away
from Tasmania, where M. laetum is endemic and the
original host of K. myopori, M. insulare, is planted
ornamentally and has naturalised (Webb et al. 1988).
Also notable is New Zealand’s much stricter biosecu-
rity legislation and border biosecurity procedures
(Williams 2000) than California and most of the
Pacific Island nations. The fact that K. myopori has
already moved from California to Hawaii, a 2,390 km
jump, suggests that K. myopori is more likely to reach
other Myoporum species in the Pacific from California
and not Tasmania. This echoes a similar result with
fire ants (Solenopsis invicta), where all of the world’s
invasive populations are descendants of the original
North American invasion and not multiple escapes
from South America (Ascunce et al. 2011).
Several outstanding natural history mysteries
remain. It is very unusual for a thrips population to
sustain a multi-year, large scale outbreak (Laurence
Mound, pers. comm.). Is the sustained K. myopori
outbreak in California caused by some feature of
California’s coastal environment (e.g., mild winters),
the condition of the host plants in California (e.g., heat
stress, low genetic diversity, particularly susceptible
genetic material), or the absence of specialist natural
enemies of K. myopori? The presumably low genetic
diversity in M. laetum ‘Carsonii’ combined with an
environment warmer and drier than the native range in
New Zealand could plausibly benefit K. myopori.
However, initial indications are that K. myopori
populations are also starting a sustained outbreaking
in Hawaii on native, and presumably more genetically
diverse, M. sandwicense, and plants are again being
defoliated and killed (Cythia King, Department of
Land and Natural Resources, pers. comm.). It is also
unclear why local southern California natural enemies
have not responded to the sustained K. myopori
outbreak. There is no indication yet that predatory
insects have increased in numbers on M. laetum at my
Orange County sites (personal observation). Perhaps
K. myopori exploits in some way the chemical
defences of M. laetum.
This also appears to have been an unusually fast-
acting, albeit inadvertent, case of classical biological
control. Successful weed biocontrol agents typically
take a decade or more from introduction to control a
host population, if at all (McFadyen 1998; Carruthers
et al. 2011). While it is impossible to rule out some
undetected lag phase in the case of Klambothrips in
southern California, its subsequent rapid expansion
through California and apparently immediate outbreak
in Hawaii are consistent with little to no lag.
This case is consistent with the New Associations
hypothesis (Hokkanen and Pimentel 1989; Parker and
Hay 2005; cf. Waage et al. 1988), where the combi-
nation of a genus-specialist with a naive host congener
results in particularly strong host suppression. In
classical biological control, agents are instead typi-
cally selected from surveys of natural enemies of the
weeds in their native ranges (McFadyen 1998). The
case of M. laetum and K. myopori would support the
New Associations hypothesis if it could be shown that
M. laetum is less tolerant of K. myopori herbivory than
its native host, M. insulare.
Lastly, steps need be taken to limit the further
spread of K. myopori to native Myoporum populations
beyond Hawaii. This also most likely applies to the
undescribed, closely related, Klambothrips from M.
insulare on mainland Australia (Mound and Morris
2007; Mound 2008). Internal and between state trade
in plant material by the North American horticultural
industry is almost certainly responsible for K. myopori
spreading 750 km from San Diego to San Francisco in
just 3–4 years and then to Hawaii. Klambothrips
myopori almost certainly reached California on live
Myoporum tissue imported by the horticultural indus-
try. To protect native Myoporum populations, it is
important that future movements of live Myoporum
tissue between countries are done with great care with
only seed, or, preferably, not at all.
Given that international trade is extensive and
current biosecurity procedures are inadequate to
prevent new incursions, it is perhaps inevitable that
many invasive plants will be gradually reunited with
old host-specialist enemies as well as discovered by
new enemies (Hawkes 2007; Diez et al. 2010). Many
tens of thousands of plant species have been moved
Inadvertent biocontrol of NZ plant by Australian insect in USA 451
123
from their native ranges into cultivation throughout
the world and a substantial minority continue to
naturalise. Enemy release is one important component
causing some of these plants to become invasive
weeds. In this context, the threat from ‘‘leaky’’
national borders to agriculture, forestry, and native
species will be offset to some extent by the benefits of
weeds being (re-)connected with host-specialist ene-
mies. Cases like M. laetum and K. myopori, of a genus-
specialist encountering and biologically controlling a
novel host congener in a foreign range, may become
more frequent in the future, especially in areas of the
world with heavy trade and insufficient border
biosecurity.
Acknowledgments Ross Beever, Jenny Dimock, Laura Fagan,
Richard Hill, Nicholas Martin, and Walter Stahel provided useful
information about the absence (so far) of K. myopori records from
New Zealand. Laurence Mound, Mark Hoddle, and Richard Hill
made useful comments on earlier drafts and were generous in
sharing their observations of K. myopori. Cythia King shared
useful information about the ongoing invasion of K. myopori in
Hawaii. Thanks to Stan and Helen Molles for hosting my family
and me when in Orange County.
References
Ascunce MS, Yang CC, Oakey J, Calcaterra L, Wu WJ, Shih CJ,
Goudet J, Ross KG, Shoemaker D (2011) Global invasion
history of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Science
331(6020):1066–1068
Bossard CC, Randall JM, Hoshovsky MC (2000) Invasive plants
of California’s wildlands. University of California Press,
Berkeley
Brenzel KN (1995) Sunset western garden book, 40th edn.
Sunset Publishing Corporation, Menlo Park
California Horticultural Invasives Prevention (2005) Plant right,
keep invasive plants in check. California Horticultural In-
vasives Prevention, California. http://www.plantright.org/
plants/invasive.php?invPlan-
tID=25®ion=south\s\do5(c)oast. Viewed 19 Feb 2009
California Invasive Plant Council (2006) Plant profiles: Myopo-
rum laetum. California Invasive Plant Council, California.
http://www.cal-ipc.org/ip/management/plant\s\do5(p)ro-
files/Myoporum\s\do5(l)aetum.php#proc. Viewed 20 Feb
2009
Carruthers RI, Center T, Hoddle MS, Hough-Goldstein J, Morin
L, Smith L, Wagner DL (2011) Classical biological control
for the protection of natural ecosystems. Biol Control
54(Suppl 1):S2–S33
Carvalheiro LG, Buckley YM, Ventim R, Fowler SV, Memmott J
(2008) Apparent competition can compromise the safety of
highly specific biocontrol agents. Ecol Lett 11(7):690–700
Chittka L, Schurkens S (2001) Successful invasion of a floral
market. Nature 411:653
City of Los Angeles Bureau of Street Services (2009) Urban
forestry division street tree selection guide. City of Los
Angeles Bureau of Street Services, California. http://www.
lacity.org/BOSS/UrbanForestryDivision/StreetTreeSelection
Guide.htm. Viewed 20 Feb 2009
Cockayne L (1914) New Zealand plants suitable for North
American gardens, with hints as to their cultivation. John
Mackay, Government Printer, Wellington
Conant P, Hirayama CK, Lee MI, Young CL, Heu RA (2009)
Naio thrips, Klambothrips myopori Mound & Morris
(Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae). New Pest Advisory No.
09-02, Plant Pest Control Branch, Division of Plant
Industry, State of Hawaii Department of Agriculture,
Honolulu, USA
Didham R, Pawson S (2011) BUGZ bibliography of New Zea-
land terrestrial invertebrates online, New Zealand. http://
www.bugz.org.nz. Viewed 4 Oct 2011
Diez JM, Dickie I, Edwards G, Hulme PE, Sullivan JJ, Duncan
RP (2010) Negative soil feedbacks accumulate over time
for non-native plant species. Ecol Lett 13(7):803–809
Downer J (2006) New thrips pest attacks Myoporum. Landsc
Notes (University of California/Ventura County) 19(3):1
Elkinton JS, Liebhold AM (1990) Population dynamics of gypsy
moth in North America. Annu Rev Entomol 35:571–596
Harris G (1998) Invasive New Zealand weeds: our native plant
invaders. CalEPPC News (California Exotic Pest Plant
Council) 6(4):8–9
Hawkes CV (2007) Are invaders moving targets? The generality
and persistence of advantages in size, reproduction, and
enemy release in invasive plant species with time since
introduction. Am Nat 170(6):832–843
Hokkanen HMT, Pimentel D (1989) New associations in biological
control: theory and practice. Can Entomol 121(10):829–840
Kitz J (2006) Myoporum laetum. In: Bossard CC, Randall JM,
Hoshovsky MC (eds) Invasive plants of California’s wild-
lands. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 246–248
Maco SE, McPherson EG, Simpson JR, Peper PJ, Xiao Q (2003)
City of San Francisco, California street tree resource
analysis. Center for Urban Forest Research, Pacific
Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Davis,
CA
Martin N (2009) Plant-SyNZ�. Plant and Food Research,
Auckland, New Zealand. http://www.crop.cri.nz/home/
plant-synz/index.php. Viewed 4 Oct 2011
McClintock E, Turner RG (2001) The trees of golden gate park
and San Francisco. Heyday Books, San Francisco
McConnachie AJ, Hill MP, Byrne MJ (2004) Field assessment
of a frond-feeding weevil, a successful biological control
agent of red waterfern, Azolla filiculoides, in southern
Africa. Biol Control 29(3):326–331
McFadyen REC (1998) Biological control of weeds. Annu Rev
Entomol 43:369–393
Mound LA (2008) Identification and host associations of some
Thysanoptera Phlaeothripinae described from Australia
pre-1930. Zootaxa 1741:41–60
Mound LA, Morris DC (2007) A new thrips pest of Myoporum
cultivars in California, in a new genus of leaf-galling Aus-
tralian Phlaeothripidae (Thysanoptera). Zootaxa 1495:35–45
Parker JD, Hay ME (2005) Biotic resistance to plant invasions?
Native herbivores prefer non-native plants. Ecol Lett
8(9):959–967
452 J. J. Sullivan
123
Pool B (2002) Some object to Caltrans’ re-greening of freeways.
Los Angeles Times 6 June: B1
Power AG, Mitchell CE (2004) Pathogen spillover in disease
epidemics. Am Nat 164:S79–S89
R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and envi-
ronment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Sta-
tistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.
org/. ISBN 3-900051-07-0
Stadler B, Muller T, Orwig D (2006) The ecology of energy and
nutrient fluxes in hemlock forests invaded by hemlock
woolly adelgid. Ecology 87(7):1792–1804
Sullivan M (2004) The trees of San Francisco. Pomegranate,
California
van Epenhuijsen CW, Henderson RC, Carpenter A, Burge GK
(2000) The rise and fall of manuka blight scale: a review of
the distribution of Eriococcus orariensis (Hemiptera:
eriococcidae) in New Zealand. N Z Entomol 23(1):67–70
van Klinken RD, Fichera G, Cordo H (2003) Targeting bio-
logical control across diverse landscapes: the release,
establishment, and early success of two insects on mesquite
(Prosopis spp.) insects in Australian rangelands. Biol
Control 26(1):8–20
Waage JK, Greathead DJ, Brown R, Paterson RRM, Haskell PT,
Cook RJ, Krishnaiah K (1988) Biological control: chal-
lenges and opportunities [and discussion]. Philos Trans R
Soc Lond B Biol Sci 318(1189):111–128
Webb CJ, Sykes WR, Garnock-Jones PJ (1988) Flora of New
Zealand volume IV. Naturalised pteridophytes, gymno-
sperms, dicotyledons. Botany Division, Department of Sci-
entific and Industrial Research, Christchurch, New Zealand
Williams JM (2000) New Zealand under siege: a review of the
management of biosecurity risks to the environment. Office
of the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment,
Wellington
Zimmermann HG, Moran VC, Hoffmann JH (2001) The
renowned cactus moth, Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidop-
tera: Pyralidae): its natural history and threat to native
Opuntia floras in Mexico and the United States of America.
Fla Entomol 84(4):543–551
Inadvertent biocontrol of NZ plant by Australian insect in USA 453
123