Tuya

Alyssa N. Tuya

Professor Keith Jones

College Composition

9 September 2010

What a Wonderful Paper: The MLA Form on a Beautiful Morning

Notice, first of all, that this paper has no cover page. The first page of the paper serves as

the cover page, containing all the information necessary. An added benefit is that no extra trees

have to be chopped down and processed for that superfluous sheet of paper. Also note that the

date is not in the usual order and is not broken up by a comma. Whether this is to confuse

matters or to make chronological sorting easier, I’m not quite sure, though I assume the latter.

Additionally, notice that everything—without exception—is double-spaced in the MLA form.

The header, the paragraphs of the essay, block quotes, the title, the works cited page—everything

—is simply double spaced. Set your computer to double space, never hit the carriage return

more than once in a row, and don’t look back. Each line should be exactly the same distance

from every other line in the entire document.

Each paragraph begins exactly one-half inch from the left margin. And, speaking of

margins, each one is exactly one inch in from the edge of the paper. Please notice that the right-

hand margin, in the MLA form, is not justified. The only exception to the one-inch-from-the-

edge rule is the header, which is placed exactly one-half inch from the top edge and one inch

from the right edge. It appears on every page, without exception. Even the works cited page—if

the paper cites works—has this header. The header is made up of the last name of the student, a

space, and the page number. Students often experience frustration in attempting to get the page

numbers to work properly. Often, this results from an attempt to turn on the word processor’s

Tuya

automatic page numbering while having a separate running header containing the student’s last

name. Do not turn on automatic page numbering. Instead, you should open the header, set it to

right-justify, type your last name and a space, and then look for a way to insert a page number in

the header. Normally, you will click on a number sign of some sort.

Additionally, the title is somewhat interesting, considering the subject matter. At least it

doesn’t say “MLA Handout” or, worse yet, just have a blank space where the title should be.

And it doesn’t say “To Use the MLA Form or Not To Use the MLA Form: That is the

Question.” Be certain always to have a title and to put some effort into it. Please, for the sake of

your professor’s sanity, don’t title your papers things like “Assignment.” This is often indicative

of a certain lack of resourcefulness on the part of the student. Please note that the title is not in

all capital letters, not underlined, and not in a different font. The words in the title should give it

all the zing it needs (though you may put a title in boldface, if you feel led so to do).

Although punctuation is the caramel that holds together the peanuts of this nut roll called

the English language, it is often misunderstood. Now that you have this document, this will be

the case no longer.

We start with the apostrophe. When it appears in a pronoun, the apostrophe always

indicates a contraction. I’m fine. We’re all fine. You’re fine, too. He’s all right; she’s writing

well; it’s going quickly; they’re going to be up all night. I’ve had worse. I’ll see about that.

We’ll do more later. We’ve been working too hard. You’ll see my point eventually. She’s

reading a book. She’s had three overdue books today. There’s no cause for alarm. Where’s the

fire? When’s the truck getting here? Who’s got a cell phone? Who’s the man with the coat?

How’s the weather? What’s the problem? Any of these could be expanded without damaging

Tuya

the meaning of the sentences. I am fine. We are all fine. She has had three overdue books

today. What is the problem?

To put it quite bluntly, apostrophes in pronouns are always contractions. They never

indicate the possessive. If you remember this, you will be able to keep the following problematic

words straight: it’s (contraction of “it is”) vs. its (the possessive of “it”); they’re (contraction of

“they are”) vs. their (the possessive of “they”) vs. there (location indicator or introductory word,

as in “there is” or “there are”); you’re (contraction of “you are”) vs. your (possessive of “you”);

and, finally, who’s (contraction of “who is”) vs. whose (the possessive of “who”).

The apostrophe, in other cases, is used to indicate the possessive case, and it is usually

followed by the letter S. Where is the cat’s bowl? Who took the book’s cover? The secret

agent’s cover was blown by the silly spy’s nonsense. The curse’s effect was to prevent the team

from winning. The lady’s purse is small.

When the noun you wish to put in the possessive case is plural and ends with an S, add

the apostrophe without an additional S. What are all the cats’ names? Who took these books’

covers? The seven curses’ effects were to do a lot. The ladies’ purses are all small. The

Joneses’ cars are always green. Consider how many possessives there are! What are the

possessives’ qualities? What is the wall’s color? What are the walls’ colors? My parents went

to the parents’ banquet, but one parent’s car wouldn’t start. Do you know the Joneses? They’re

very nice. We should go to the Joneses’ house for dinner.

When the noun you wish to put in the possessive case is plural but does not end in S, add

an apostrophe and the letter S. The child’s garden is big, but the children’s garden is bigger.

That man’s salary is small; that woman’s salary is larger; but women’s salaries are,

Tuya

unfortunately, not always larger than men’s salaries are. The red sock’s odor was pungent. But

the Red Sox’s pitching was good.

When the noun you wish to put in the possessive case is singular and ends with an S, add

the apostrophe and an additional S. The boss’s son drove all the bosses’ cars. The moss’s color

is green. The coin toss’s result was tails.

When a proper noun you wish to put in the possessive case is singular and ends with an

S, add the apostrophe but no additional S. Jesus’ birthday is celebrated on December 25. The

commandments were held in Moses’ hands. Professor Jones’ explanation of the rules of

grammar make sense.

Avoid using apostrophes when making nouns plural. This is not usually troublesome in

the case of simple nouns: one dog, two dogs; one chicken, two chickens. When nouns are

numbers or abbreviations, things get a bit trickier. You should say that the 1980s were rough

and that you bought two CDs that you grew to hate, though you found them at one of your

favorite URLs. You had to go to three different ATMs to get the money to pay for them.

Luckily, you had gotten As and Bs on your report card, so your parents weren’t upset.

Apostrophes are used in contractions and in the possessive forms of nouns—though, remember,

not of pronouns. Thus, you might say that 1942’s Jack Benny differed from 1953’s, though his

radio program with roughly the same cast was broadcast throughout the 1940s and 1950s. The

possessive is formed in the same way whether you’re talking about 1953’s Jack Benny or Jack

Benny’s violin or the violin’s case. When pronouns enter the picture, the rule changes: you

would no more talk about he’s violin than you would about it’s case—it should be his violin and

its case. Why? Apostrophes in pronouns are always contractions. They never indicate the

possessive.

Tuya

Capitalize the first word of a title or a subtitle and every other major word in it. The

Freedom of Life: Of Oxen, of Sheep, and of Cattle. Capitalize the first word of a sentence.

That’s fine. Capitalize the first word of a quote if the first word is the first word in a sentence.

She said, “We ought to go to the store.” She said that we should “go to the store.” Capitalize

proper nouns. Go to Egypt, France, and Italy, Mr. Jones, and see Mel, Anne, and Greg in Cairo,

Paris, and Florence. Nicknames are proper nouns. I said to Dad, “Shall I go?” But I asked my

mother, “Where is our dog, Soup?” Go to the professor. When will Professor Jones be in?

The colon’s job is to introduce something: a list, a long quotation, or a phrase to which

you wish to draw attention. Please note that: to draw attention. Shakespeare was fond of

quoting names: “Bernie, Ernie, Helen, Sue, Michael, Rowan, Algeroo.” The colon is at its

stylistic best when it appears after the grammatical sense of the sentence is complete: when what

appears before it is an independent clause. A colon is preceded by an independent clause, but it

does not have to precede one. Briefly, because I don’t want to muddle the issue, a colon may

also separate a title from a subtitle (see the title of this very document), and the independent

clause rule does not apply in that case.

The semicolon’s main job is to separate two independent clauses. If the clause that

precedes the semicolon is independent, but the clause that follows it is not, the semicolon is

being used incorrectly. It’s easy to use well; it’s easy to overuse.

The only other job of the semicolon is to make a list clear when the use of commas alone

would not be able to do so. Everyone should fall into line, march out the door, and follow the

yellow line. Everyone should fall into line; march out the door; and, once we all get the signal,

follow the yellow line. Please go to Houston, Texas; Ashmore, Vermont; and St. Paul.

Tuya

Afterwards, you may wish to visit East St. Louis, Illinois; St. Louis; and Hermann. I read

Shakespeare, who loves words; Chaucer, who loves plots; and Milton, who loves neither.

Before we move on to talk about the comma, that sly dog of the punctuation world, it

would help to understand what manner of things are possible with two independent clauses. You

may do one of three things with them. One: Leave them alone. Let them exist as two separate

sentences. I like short sentences. You don’t care for them. Two: Connect them with a

semicolon. I like short sentences; you don’t care for them. Three: Connect them with a comma

and a coordinating conjunction. I like short sentences, but you don’t care for them.

Although the math seems specious, these three good things to do with two independent

clauses are subject to four common errors. Error One: to fuse them . . . to make them into a run-

on (or fused) sentence. I like short sentences you don’t care for them. Error Two: to connect

them with a semicolon and a conjunction. I like short sentences; and you don’t care for them.

[Note: Although this is, technically, an error, you might have a valid stylistic reason for doing

so. Understand that you are breaking a rule—and which rule you’re breaking—if you choose to

do so.] Error Three (and possibly the most common): to connect them with only a coordinating

conjunction. I like short sentences but you don’t care for them. Error Four: to connect them

with only a comma—the comma splice. I like short sentences, you don’t care for them.

With this in mind, let’s examine the comma in more detail. Please, please read section

3.2.2 of The MLA Handbook and pages 40-48 of The Guide to Rapid Revision very carefully.

There are rules for comma use, and those rules help our understanding immensely. They are

important for man, woman, and child. Regrettably, many students fail to provide a comma after

an introductory phrase or after the penultimate item in a list.

Tuya

In addition to its use in helping a conjunction to separate two independent clauses, a

comma performs other functions. It separates items in a list. There are many examples above,

below, and to the right of this sentence. It sets off an introductory phrase—no matter how short

it may be!—from the rest of the sentence. Last night, I stayed up late writing this. After I

managed to finish, I headed for bed. It sets off non-restrictive phrases. Chattanooga, the queen

of Tennessee cities, has over 300,000 residents. Stealing a policeman’s helmet, a crime of which

Wooster stands accused, is too common. The lake, which freezes over every January, is warm

enough for swimming.

Let’s have no more confusion on the differences between dashes and hyphens.

Generally, the hyphen is used to connect compound adjectives. I enjoy Vietnamese-American

literature. My four-year-old daughter does, too. I found a three-letter word. I study sixteenth-

century literature. But when such hyphenated phrases become objects, whether direct or of

prepositions, they often lose their hyphens. Have I told you that my daughter is a four year old?

I gave a book to the two year old. The word had three letters. Shakespeare is one of the best

writers of the sixteenth century.

Dashes are not hyphens. A dash is longer—it is composed of two hyphens. It is used to

set off non-restrictive phrases to which you wish to give particular emphasis. Dashes are—and I

wish to emphasize this—not hyphens. Note that a dash is either made up of two hyphens and no

spaces--like so--or of a long dash—if your computer is able to make one. One hyphen-this is

what a hyphen masquerading as a dash looks like, and pretty silly it looks, too-will not serve as a

dash.

The latest edition of the MLA doesn’t demand italics, but it encourages its use. In this, it

differs from previous editions. For this course, you may use underlining or italics

Tuya

interchangeably—provided the italic script is distinctive enough and provided that you maintain

consistency. Avoid the overuse of underlining to emphasize. Usually, your sentence structure

can be framed to give a point all the emphasis it needs; in those rare instances where underlining

helps, use it—but note such instances are rare. I have used them a few times in this delineation

of all things compositional, but never without cause. Also, don’t feel the need to put a word or

phrase in all capital letters to emphasize it; so, too, will one exclamation point serve—you don’t

need to use three or four. Your language should carry most of the emphasis necessary: word

choice can be an exquisite means to accomplish the stunning, shattering emphasis you require.

Underlining is also used for the titles of major works. I read a review of Upbeats and

Beatdowns in The New York Times. Apparently, Five Iron Frenzy read Hamlet, saw Les

Misérables, and went to Star Trek: Generations. Use quotation marks around the titles of minor

works of various kinds. I still haven’t heard “Combat Chuck,” but I’ve read “Stopping by

Woods on a Snowy Evening.” I’ve lost my copy of my essay “Is there an Ophelia in this Text?”

but I have a copy of “What a Wonderful Paper: The MLA on a Beautiful Morning.”

There are a few more troublesome words in the English language, including to, two, and

too. The first indicates an infinitive or is a preposition; the second is a number; the third means

either “also” or “to a greater extent than is desirable.” “I want to go, too.” “Sorry, but you’re too

late.” “Passed” and “past” are commonly mistaken for each other. I have passed out handouts

on this subject in the past. Confusion also strikes the unwary upon encountering “than” and

“then.” I knew him far better then; in fact, I knew him better than most people did. I’ve also

often noticed a tendency to use the phrase “often times” when the word “often” will do.

Beginning a sentence with the word often is often awkward. This can often be corrected by

moving the word to a different, but appropriate, place in the sentence. Sometimes students will

Tuya

say “I do this to better the situation.” A better way to say this is “I do this to improve the

situation.” I also encounter a fair number of unnecessary, unscholarly interjections. Especially

in scholarly essays, avoid beginning a sentence with “well” or “so.” The conjunctive adverb

“however” is also frequently misused. People often separate it from the rest of the sentence with

a comma; however, because it is what it is, it should be proceeded by a semi-colon and followed

by a comma. If you use it, however, in the first of two independent clauses or in a sentence with

one independent clause, a semi-colon would be inappropriate. Finally, “alright” and “alot” do

not exist, though “already” does. For the first two, simply make the appropriate substitution. All

right is all right to say. This shouldn’t give you a lot of trouble. Along similar lines, note that

the word “already” is different from the phrase “all ready.” The adjective “everyday” differs

from the phrase “every day” as well.

Allow me a few moments to talk about the peculiarities of quotations. Ellipsis are

addressed in section 3.7.5 of The MLA Handbook (Gibaldi 114-18). When omitting parts of a

quote, the periods which make up an ellipsis should have spaces between them, and between the

words on either side: “It is . . . important” (Hoop 375). Beware of this, because some word

processing programs attempt to fix this for you, eliminating the spaces. In Microsoft Word, you

can avoid this by turning off that option—as well as the very annoying option of converting

typed URLs into hypertext—by doing the following. For the former, go to Insert and pull down

to Autotext. Click on the Autocorrect tab, scroll down to the one in question (“Replace . . . with

…”) and delete it. For the latter, go to Insert and pull down to Autotext. Click on the Autoformat

tab, then remove the check from “Replace . . . Internet and Network Paths with Hyperlinks.”

That will prevent your computer from turning URLs blue and underlining them—you will then,

therefore, be able to present them in proper MLA form.

Tuya

If you were to quote one “word,” or even “an entire phrase,” remember that punctuation

remains inside the “quotes.” This is always the case in American Standard Punctuation. Singing

“Lah dee dah,” the youth sat on the table. She said, “I’ve been here since Tuesday,” but she had

been here since Monday night. But we will “look out at the winds.” When she asked, “Have

you seen the show?” he answered, “No!” The only exceptions to this rule are the colon and the

semicolon. They manage to slip out of the quotation marks, particularly in titles. I once wrote a

paper called “‘Two Chairs for Friendship’: A Kierkegaardian Approach to Exercise.” I said,

“The colon and the semicolon have a particular power”: escaping. Hamlet says three things:

“When the wind blows north-northwest, I know a hawk from a handsaw”; “Now I am alone”;

and “That’s all, folks!”

If you are quoting someone who is quoting someone, use single quotation marks inside

double quotations marks. One of my professors always said, “Jack Benny always used to say,

‘This is Jack Benny talking.’” If you are quoting a sentence that ends with an exclamation mark

or a question mark, that ending punctuation proves more powerful than the comma that would

usually occur there and cancels it out: “This is Jack Benny talking!” said Jack Benny on

numerous occasions—rather than “This is Jack Benny talking,” Jack Benny mumbled. For some

reason, the inappropriate use of single quotation marks has increased in recent years. It seems

that some students think that if you only quote one “word” you need to use “single” quotation

marks. Such a belief is simply erroneous. Allow me to utter a final word on using quotation

marks: if you happen to need to use a phrase that is considered cliché—something you should

try to avoid anyway—don’t call attention to it by “putting it in quotes.” Even if you are an “old

dog” attempting to learn “new tricks,” you can and should “avoid” this.

Tuya

Occasionally, you may need to make an editorial interjection in a quotation. If you do so,

please use square brackets to indicate material that you have inserted into the text. Jones writes

that “the use of language by [Milton] is studiously significant” (220). Hoop argues that “the

character of Hamlettte [sic] is multifarious” (22). In the first example, the bracketed editorial

interjection probably replaces a pronoun; in the second, the author wishes to make it evident that

Hoop is the one who has grievously misspelled Hamlet’s name—“sic” is Latin for “thus.”

I’d like to turn from grammatical concerns back to more general writing advice at this

point. Though quotes are often quite useful—and, indeed, necessary in some instances—one

place where it is inappropriate to quote is in the first sentence of your paper. When the first

student tried this (in 379 B.C.), it worked rather well. Since that time, however, it has become

cliché and trite. It is now, in all instances, boring. Avoid it like the plague. This rule holds for

the use of dictionary definitions as well, especially, though not by any means exclusively, at the

beginning of an essay. Unless a word is very obscure, or you are using The Oxford English

Dictionary to demonstrate a significant change in the word’s meaning over time, quoting from a

dictionary reminds all professors of high school essays, which is something you never want them

to think about when they are reading your college essays. Along similar lines, since the dawn of

time, students have started their essays with phrases like “since the dawn of time.” This is

anathema. Always avoid such huge, sweeping statements, even if they do not begin your essay.

They are never acceptable. Please note the very amusing intentional hypocrisy in the previous

two sentences.

Should you avoid rhetorical questions? Are long strings of rhetorical questions even

worse than asking one? Is there a better way to introduce a topic? The answer to these three

questions is, in order, usually, definitely, and most certainly. You might get by with one

Tuya

rhetorical question in an essay, but please don’t overdo it. I would prefer you avoid them

altogether. Is the passive voice always to be avoided? For my purposes, no. When the passive

voice becomes awkward, you should rephrase the sentence structure. But if it’s clear or

necessary, I have no objections to it.

Many students have informed me that they have been told never to use the first person or

a contraction in an essay. Both of these can be overdone, but I do not ask you to avoid them on

principle. Avoid them when they become awkward, repetitive, or weak. Observe how the

following sentence can be made stronger when the first person is eliminated: “I see the current

strife in Northern Ireland as rising out of a strong background of animosity and stubbornness,

and I see this history as being in direction opposition to the current reforms and solutions.” “The

current strife in Northern Ireland rises out of a strong background of animosity and stubbornness,

and this history is in direct opposition to the current reforms and solutions.” Most phrases like “I

intend in this paper to establish that” or “I believe that” can be cut without detriment. One

should also know when one should avoid the “one should” construction: when it becomes

awkward and / or pretentious (i.e., usually).

Gender-specific—that is, gender-exclusive—language ought to be avoided. Careful

reconstruction of a sentence is usually all that is required: putting such sentences in the plural is

often a quick (and usually adequate) solution. See me if you find such rephrasing difficult—I

can help.

If you use a thesaurus, please also use a dictionary. The word you may be using to

replace another word may not actually be appropriate. This is particularly the case when

introducing quotations and desiring variety. For my purposes, the verbs used to introduce

quotations do not need to be all that varied: stick to “says,” “states,” “argues,” and, perhaps,

Tuya

“posits”—but only when the verb does what you wish it to do. It is doubtful that the person you

are quoting actually articulates, verbalizes, pronounces, or asseverates a direct quotation.

Perhaps it would be wise to point out two other things that you should be careful about.

Whenever you wish to use a number less than one hundred, please write out the entire number.

Some say that you should write out numbers with three syllables or less, but that’s not the best

rule. You might have to mention the number thirty-seven right next to the number thirty-six, and

that might prove a problem. If you are using a number of numbers—statistics, percentages,

distances, et cetera—you may consider yourself to have a legitimate exception to this rule.

Though numbers under one hundred are written out, page numbers, no matter their size, are not

written out. Abbreviations, too, should be written out in formal writing, except, perhaps, for

things like 12:00 a.m., A.D. 1931, or other, scholarly abbreviations (e.g., i.e., N.B., etc.). Be

careful to avoid pressing the space bar twice when you don’t intend to do so (this is a more

common error than you might think). After periods and colons (but not after semicolons), two

spaces are fine. In the middle of a sentence, though, it looks silly, and I am apt to notice it and to

point it out to you. Make certain that expressions are parallel in any list. If they aren’t, I am

usually quick to point it out to you, to ask you to change it, and I draw two parallel lines in the

margin to indicate the problem. Note, again, the intentional hypocrisy: the expressions ought to

be parallel: to point, to ask, and to draw. One error that is all too common is the comma splice,

it is awfully annoying. There’s some more intentional hypocrisy! The comma splice is easy to

fix, though; a semi-colon can help the situation. Alternately, you could change the comma into a

period and start a new sentence. The split infinitive is also a common mistake. Instead of saying

“to quickly run,” avoid splitting the infinitive—to run—by moving the adverb to a more

appropriate place: “to run quickly.” Yes, the writers of Star Trek were wrong: they should have

Tuya

said, “to go boldly” or—and this strikes me as a bit weaker, though still a correct option

—“boldly to go.”

The following are examples of parenthetical citations in the MLA form. If you use any

word from a source—any word, that is, unique to that source—it must be in quotation marks and

cited. In Murder on the Yellow Brick Road, the hyphenated word “fez-like” provides an

interesting contrast to “tinsel-town” (Kaminsky 1). The parenthetical citation consists of two

things: The author’s last name and the page number. If you use the author’s name in the

sentence, you only have to give me the page information. Kaminsky’s introduction is not all it

could be: “Someone had murdered a Munchkin” (1). If you are referring to an idea the author

expresses, but not to a specific sentence or word that the author uses, you still must cite it by

giving me the author’s name and (if the idea comes from a specific page or group of pages) the

page number. Eventually, the narrator discovers that the butler did it (Kaminsky 341). If you are

not referring to a specific page, just give the author’s name. Many murder mysteries can be

looked at with scorn (Kaminsky). Finally, if you are not referring to a specific page and you

include the author’s name in the sentence, you don’t need to give me any further information.

Kaminsky’s work has been translated into Japanese.

Were I to quote more than four lines from a work, I would indent one full inch.

This is twice as much as I normally indent for the beginning of a paragraph. By

doing so, I am sure that no one will be confused as to whether my indention is a

paragraph indention or a block quote indention. I would not use opening or

closing quotation marks. The fact that I have indented one full inch serves the

same purpose that quotation marks normally serve. If there is “a quote within ‘a

quote within’ the citation,” I would follow the rules just demonstrated. “Double

Tuya

quotations marks” within a block quote and single quotation marks within the

double quotation marks. I would not alter the right-hand margin in any way. The

citation for a block quote occurs outside the ending punctuation of the quote and

without ending punctuation of its own. Block quotes are double-spaced, as is

everything in the MLA form. (Hoop 341)

All the examples in this paragraph are relatively unproblematic. They follow the rule for

parenthetical citation, using the first major word in the works cited entry—which is usually the

last name(s) of the author(s)—to point people to the precise point on the list of works cited to

which they need to be directed. Because the works cited page is alphabetized, the essay’s

readers (among which I include you) will simply look for Kaminsky among the Ks and Hoop

among the Hs. In the next two examples, you would look among the Js for the work by Jones

and among the Cs for the work with two authors. We must “Quote, quote, quote” (Jones 3).

Otherwise, “nothing will serve as an example” (Clyde and Milbrook 117). Jones says, “Use the

MLA form” (12).

One trickier citing situation is the anonymous work. If no author is given, the entry on

the works cited page will (usually) begin with the title. Using the first major word in the entry

(the word by which you alphabetized the entry), point your professors to that, underlining it in

the text of your essay if it’s underlined in the list of works cited and using quotation marks if it’s

in quotation marks. You can find “examples of the first” (Examples 81). The second is,

according to one source, “not that hard to find, either” (“Addendum” 12). Without even turning

to the works cited page, you can tell that these quotations come from anonymous works, and that

the first is either a book or a major work of some kind and the second is an article or some sort of

minor work.

Tuya

“Ah,” I hear you cry. “What if there are two or more works by the same author in the

works cited list? Surely the MLA failed to consider that situation, and we’ll never be able to use

even two sources by the same author: alas and alack.” You need not fear. Such a circumstance

is not uncommon, although citing becomes just a bit trickier. Either you can make it clear in the

body of your essay from which work you are citing—often an awkward task—or you can

continue to point your audience to the appropriate point on the list of works cited by giving them

the last name of the author and the first major word (again, the word by which you alphabetized

the entry) on the works cited page. Contrast the statement “I have fourteen sports cars” (Smith,

Me 129) with this: “I have never led an extravagant lifestyle” (Smith, “You” 41). From the very

first entry, your audience members know that, among the Ss, they will find at least two works by

a person named Smith, and that they should then look among the Ms in the Smith entries for the

work in question. Go there yourself and see. You’ll also discover the “three-hyphens-or-three-

dashes-indicate-’this-work-begins-with-exactly-the-same-information-as-does-the-previous-

entry’” rule.

Perhaps you are thinking, “But what if I’m writing an essay on Francis Schaeffer, and I

intend to cite three works by him and one work by Edith Schaeffer? I’m stymied!” Stymied is

exactly what you are not, though you may be temporarily perplexed. The easiest solution is to

make sure that it’s clear in the body of your essay which Schaeffer is the Schaeffer in question.

If that proves awkward or repetitious, point your readers to the proper point as best you can:

after all, that’s the answer to the question “How shall we then live?” (F. Schaeffer 22). “Egad!

How simple!” you cry. “But I want to cite Francis, Edith, and Franky Schaeffer, and two of the

three share the same first initial.” Don’t worry—simply provide the full first name in such a

case. Isn’t that right, Franky? “Oh, absolutely!” (Franky Schaeffer 69).

Tuya

Section 6.4.7 will tell you what to do when you’re quoting someone who has been quoted

in the work you’re citing. For example, if you’re writing a paper on Bob Dylan, you may want

to quote part of an interview with him. If that’s the case, go ahead and quote him: “I usually

listen to songs about things” (Dylan, qtd. in Futterman E1).

The most perplexing issue of all, citationwise, is citing from internet resources. The

MLA Handbook offers veritable scads of valuable information on how to put an internet resource

into a list of works cited in section 5.6: “Citing Web Publications.” It then provides examples of

in-text citations scattered in section 5.6.1. Here are some examples I’ve come up with; you can

see how parenthetical citation works with the Works Cited page for web sites. Some sites do not

provide an author; but they do provide other information by which they may be cited

(“Phenomenon”). Some are different citations of the same URL because they cite different

information from the same site (Pioch; Eyck). Some provide a good deal of information

(Lancashire). And some are just good to think about (Dylan).

I will now speak at greater length about what ought to be the most common kind of

scholarly information found by means of the internet: the article published in print form in a

scholarly journal and available by electronic means. The articles by Beck and MacDonald in the

list of works cited for this document are examples of two different kinds of scholarly articles

obtained by electronic means. The first part of each citation is extremely easy: simply cite it as

if you had put your hands on the physical, print version of the article. As you obtained it

electronically (and as your audience might conceivably do so as well), you should, out of

common courtesy, let them know how and when you found it, and where, more specifically, you

got the information you’re citing. For the MacDonald article, an article available in .pdf format

—a format that looks exactly like the physical, print version of the article, including the exact

Tuya

page numbers found in the original article—your job as its citer is remarkably easy. You simply

provide the precise page number of each citation; your professor will have access to the same

page numbers and will be able to find what you’re citing very easily. For example, you should

know that MacDonald attempts to show that there is a distinct correlation between the journeys

of Odysseus and the apostle Paul. His thesis is that “Luke’s intention in relating Paul’s

shipwreck to those of Odysseus was to exalt Paul and his God by comparison” (88). If, however,

you do not have the page numbers of the article (by which I do not mean the inclusive page

numbers given in a citation—the 121-41 in the Beck article citation below)—if you have a text-

only version of an article that does not indicate where one page stops and the next page begins,

in other words—you cannot easily point your professors to the specific point in the article from

which your direct quote comes. The good news is that you no longer have to count all the

paragraphs, provide that number in the citation, and cite by paragraph number (see section 5.6.4).

Your audience will bear the responsibility of finding precisely where the quote appears. For

example, the author of the article without pagination in its electronic format argues with Parry’s

theory about oral poetics, which, she feels, “relegated the epithets to the status of metrical filler

material” (Beck). Most direct quotes will have page numbers; because this doesn’t supply page

numbers, neither do you.

Before we leave the topic of internet resources, we should address the question of

providing URLs. Some URLs are only temporary: they expire soon after viewing. The article

by Hernandez provides one such example. The actual URL I used to view the article follows in

block quote format:

<http://firstsearch.oclc.org/WebZ/FTFETCH?sessionid=sp04sw01-52699-

dl6icw4z-meknq2:entitypagenum=3:0:rule=100:fetchtype=fulltext:dbname=Wils

Tuya

onSelectPlus_FT:recno=1:resultset=1:ftformat=PDF:format=BI:isbillable=TRUE:

numrecs=1:isdirectarticle=FALSE:entityemailfullrecno=1:entityemailfullresultset

=1:entityemailftfrom=WilsonSelectPlus_FT:>.

Huge and seemingly-detailed though it is, that URL is utterly useless now. The MLA has

recognized that you need not provide useless information. Within the citation itself, you simply

indicate the database from which the article came (in this case, it came from Wilson Select Plus)

and the word “Web” to indicate its point of origin. See the works cited page of this document for

examples. Additionally, note that the MLA does say “You should include a URL as

supplementary information only when the reader probably cannot locate the source without it or

when your instructor requires it” (182). This instructor doesn’t require it, but other instructors

may. Know your audience!

When you provide inclusive page numbers in the MLA form, the MLA wants you to save

ink when possible. That’s just another way they have of protecting the earth’s natural resources.

For one- or two-digit numbers, the MLA asks for full disclosure: 1-9, 17-99, 54-55. But for

three-, four-, and five-digit numbers, according to section 3.5.6, MLA desires only the last two

digits, unless more are necessary: 104-09, 212-66, 354-55, 1,944-49, 199-279, 143-253.

When you quote from poetry or drama, you should cite by line number rather than by

page number. If you quote one line, you follow the same form as you would for an ordinary

quote: “This is my play’s last scene” (Donne 1). If you quote two or three lines, you should

place a space and slash and a space between each line: “This is my play’s last scene, here

heavens appoint. / My pilgrimage’s last mile” (Donne 1-2). If you cite four or more lines of a

poem, use block quote format (bearing in mind the absence of quotation marks in a block quote)

and keep the line breaks of the poem:

Tuya

This is my play’s last scene, here heavens appoint

My pilgrimage’s last mile; and my race

Idly, yet quickly run, hath this last pace,

My span’s last inch, my minute’s latest point . . . . (Donne 1-4)

These rules hold when citing epic poetry—although they do become a bit more complex. For

works like The Iliad, The Odyssey, The Aeneid, and Paradise Lost, you need to provide the book

and line number. The conclusion to The Odyssey is an optimistic one: “Both parties later swore

to terms of peace / set by their arbiter, Athena” (XXIV.611-12). Achilles’ re-integration into

society takes place at this point: “From the polished wagon / [Achilles’ men] lifted the priceless

ransom brought for Hector’s corpse” (Homer, Iliad XXIV.677-78). Please note the logic of these

citations. By the means of the last citation (that of The Iliad), you should be able to tell that there

are two works by someone named Homer in the list of works cited for this document. If, in an

essay you are writing, you are only citing one work by Homer—or if it’s clear (as it is in the

“Both parties” quotation above) what work you’re citing, you need not provide as much

information. The Odyssey begins with these words: “I sing” (I.1); it ends with the phrase “the

form and voice of Mentor” (XXIV.614). Between the two, there are such questions as “What am

I in for now?” (XIII.251), “What brings you to my island?” (V.92), and “Why so wakeful, / most

forlorn of men?” (XX.36); additionally, there are a number of phrases in the work: “By vales

and sharp ravines in Lakedaimon / the travelers drove to Meneláos’ mansion” (IV.1-2), “When

primal Dawn” (II.1), and “When the young Dawn came bright into the East” (XVII.1), to name

but a few.

Tuya

When you cite Dante’s Divine Comedy, you should indicate, either in the text or in your

citation—as long as it’s clear, it doesn’t matter which—the book, canto, and line number.

Beatrice asks Dante,

In the desire for me

that was directing you to love the Good

beyond which there’s no thing to draw our longing,

what chains were strung, what ditches dug across

your path that, once you’d come upon them, caused

your loss of any hope of moving forward? (Purg. XXXI.22-27)

For the answer to that question, we have to turn to Inferno: “The very sight of [the she-wolf] so

weighted me / with fearfulness that I abandoned hope” (I.52-53). Paradiso may also reveal

something about the nature of hope.

As a disciple answering his master,

prepared and willing in what he knows well,

that his proficiency may be revealed,

I said: “Hope is the certain expectation

of future glory [. . . .]” (XXV.64-68)

Note the use of quotation marks within a block quote in the example above. For quotes within

quotes within the text of your essay, see this example: “I was still bent, attentive, over him, /

when my guide nudged me lightly at the side / and said: ‘You speak; he is Italian’” (Inf.

XXVII.31-33). Another example follows: “‘Sperent in te’ was heard above us” (Par. XXV.98).

The rules for citing poetry apply for citing drama, although you must usually provide the

act and scene in addition to the line number. You may modernize Roman numerals if you wish,

Tuya

but such modernization is not mandatory. Indeed, I think Roman numerals look classier than

Arabic numbers. Just be consistent. In Thomas Kyd’s Spanish Tragedy, Hieronimo has this to

say: “Why, ha, ha, ha! Farewell, good, ha, ha, ha!” (III.xi.31). To this remarkable statement,

the second Portingale replies, “Doubtless this man is passing lunatic, / Or imperfection of his age

doth make him dote” (III.xi.32-33). Should you wish to cite a stage direction, give the number

for the line that proceeds it and follow it with the initials s.d. Horatio’s death is too much for

Isabella to bear, as we can see from the fact that “She runs lunatic” (III.viii.5.s.d.). The rules for

block quotes are the same as those for citing poetry. One passage that T. S. Eliot draws from is

Hieronimo’s polysemous utterance to Lorenzo and Balthazar:

Why then I’ll fit you; say no more.

When I was young I gave my mind

And plied myself to fruitless poetry:

Which though it profit the professor naught,

Yet is it passing pleasing to the world. (IV.i.70-74)

When a play has no act number (or, alternately, no scene number), provide what you can.

Faustus says, “O would I had never seen Wittenberg” (13.19 [I provide Arabic numbers in this

case because the Norton Anthology uses them; it would be equally correct to put “xiii.19”—note

the lowercase Roman numerals for scene number]). John Dryden’s All for Love has no scene

numbers, so you would cite it according to act number. Antony declares, “I will be justified in

all I do / To late posterity, and therefore hear me” (II.251-52).

Edmund Spenser’s Faerie Queene requires a wonderfully complex—though quite logical

—mode of citation. Books are cited by uppercase Roman numerals, cantos by lowercase,

stanzas and line numbers by Arabic numbers. Thus, “A Gentle Knight was pricking on the

Tuya

plaine” (I.i.1.1) begins the story of the Redcrosse Knight while “Suffice it heare by signes to

understand / The usuall joyes at knitting of loves band” (I.xii.40.4-5) comes near the end. The

advantage to this mode of citation is its clarity: once you have established the book and canto

you’re addressing, you can provide abbreviated citations, and your audience will still know what

you’re talking about. The theme of love in Canto xii of Book One can be seen in many places

(28.8-9, 30.1-2). Book One concerns itself with the theme at large (v.12, viii.12.8, ix.26).

Frequently, we cite passages from the Bible (with a capital “B”); these are biblical

passages (with a lowercase “b”). All you need to provide in the paragraph is the citation. This

can take a number of forms. For example, John 11:35 tells us that “Jesus wept.” Later in the

Bible, we are told that “we should love one another” (1 John 3:11b). Your professors will look

to the works cited page to find out what version you are using. See section 6.4.8 of the handbook

—or the works cited page of this handout—for an example to follow. If you are using multiple

translations in the same work, it is probably best to indicate so in the text of the essay.

Much plagiarism occurs in the process known as “direct paraphrase.” It takes place when

someone uses the author’s words and cites the author and, perhaps, the page number from which

the words are taken but neglects to put the author’s words in quotation marks. This sort of

plagiarism is particularly virulent. To avoid even accidental plagiarism, be sure that any word

which comes from an author and not from yourself is in quotation marks and cited. This is true

of single words, phrases, and sentences. All must be in quotes and appropriately cited.

Some of the suggestions in this document may apply to one professor’s desires and not to

another’s. Your job, as an intelligent writer, is to know your audience. Some professors may,

for example, object to the first person in essays—for them, you should avoid the first person.

Some disciplines demand that the passive voice be employed—this should be done, in those

Tuya

cases. But many of the statements in this document fall into the category of “rules”—to be

followed whatever the audience—unless you have considered them critically and have a definite

and discernable purpose for breaking them. Use your keen judgement and ask questions of your

professors. And if you’re wondering just how important the conventions of the MLA and the

demands of your professor are, I point you toward a recent article by Al Kamen in The

Washington Post. An organization for the treatment of drug and alcohol abuse was declined a

request for $600,000 for the following reason:

“Your application has been examined by review staff from the Division of

Extramural Program Management,” [application reviewer Diane McMenamin]

wrote, “and was judged to be non-conforming for the following reason: (1) Your

application does not conform to the instructions for format as stated in Part II of

the [grant application form] in that applications have ‘conventional border

margins of 1 inch.’” (A29)

The exactitude of your margins may not result in such a substantial financial loss, but errors in

margins will reduce your grades and prevent you from becoming the fully-developed human

being you are meant to become.

I’ve never been good with conclusions.

Tuya

Works Cited

“Addendum to the Notes on the Writing of Effective Prose.” Writing Today 12 November 2000:

12. Print.

Aeschylus. The Oresteia. Trans. Robert Fagles. New York: Penguin, 1979. Print.

Beck, Deborah. “Speech Introductions and the Character Development of Telemachus.” The

Classical Journal 94 (1998-1999): 121-41. N. pag. Wilson Select Plus. Web. 3

September 2003.

Beowulf. Trans. R. K. Gordon. New York: Dover, 1992. Print.

Block, Elizabeth. “Clothing Makes the Man: A Pattern in the Odyssey.” Transactions of the

American Philological Association 115 (1985): 1-11. JSTOR. Web. 9 September 2003.

Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Canterbury Tales. Trans. A. Kent Hieatt and Constance Hieatt. New

York: Bantam, 1964. Print.

Clyde, Andrew, and Marielle Milbrook. “All About MLA.” Shakespeare Quarterly 121 (2001):

13-194. Print.

Dante. Inferno. Trans. Allen Mandelbaum. New York: Bantam, 1982. Print.

———. Paradiso. Trans. Allen Mandelbaum. New York: Bantam, 1984. Digital Dante.

November 1997. N. pag. Institute for Learning Technologies. Web. 2 February 2003.

———. Purgatorio. Trans. Allen Mandelbaum. New York: Bantam, 1984. Print.

Dilworth, Thomas. “The Fall of Troy and the Slaughter of the Suitors: Ultimate Symbolic

Correspondence in The Odyssey.” Mosaic 27 (1994): 1-24. N. pag. Periodical

Abstracts. Web. 9 September 2003.

Donne, John. “Holy Sonnet VI.” Selected Poems. New York: Dover, 1993. 61. Print.

Tuya

Dostoevsky, Fyodor. The Brothers Karamazov: The Constance Garnett Translation Revised by

Ralph E. Matlaw: Backgrounds and Sources: Essays in Criticism. Ed. Ralph E. Matlaw.

Trans. Constance Garnett. New York: W. W. Norton, 1976. Print.

Dryden, John. All for Love. Ed. N. J. Andrew. New York: W. W. Norton, 2000. Print.

Dylan, Bob. “Sugar Baby.” bobdylan.com. Columbia Records, 2001. Web. 29 September

2003.

Examples Aplenty: Although this Work is Anonymous and has an Extremely Long Title, its

First Word is Enough for the Parenthetical Citation. New York: Wilson, 1991. Print.

Eyck, Jan van. The Arnolfini Marriage. Webmuseum, Paris. N.p., 2 July 2003.

Web. 13 March 2004.

Futterman, Ellen. “Times They are a Changin’ . . . : Dylan Speaks.” St. Louis Post-Dispatch 7

April 1994: E1+. Print.

Gibaldi, Joseph. MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers. 7th ed. New York: MLA,

2009. Print.

Hernandez, Pura Nieto. “Odysseus, Agamemnon and Apollo.” The Classical Journal 97

(2002): 319-34. Wilson Select Plus. Web. 9 September 2003.

The Holy Bible: New International Version. Colorado Springs: International Bible Society,

1984. Print.

Homer. The Iliad. Trans. Robert Fagles. New York: Penguin, 1998. Print.

———. The Odyssey. Trans. Robert Fitzgerald. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1998.

Print.

Hoop, Ally O. Hamster, Goldfish, Rocking Chair: The Necessary Trio. Paris: Je Ne Sais Pas

Press, 1932. Print.

Tuya

Jones, Keith. Notes on the Writing of Effective Prose: Don’t use Stilted Titles Like This One.

New York: Wilson, 1991. Print.

Kamen, Al. “Dean’s X-Files.” The Washington Post 5 December 2003, final ed.: A29. Print.

Kaminsky, Stuart. Murder on the Yellow Brick Road. New York: Penguin, 1979. Print.

Kyd, Thomas. The Spanish Tragedy. Ed. J. R. Mulryne. New York: W. W. Norton, 1989.

Print.

Lancashire, Ian. “Online Editor’s Introduction.” Representative Poetry On-Line. 3.0. N.p., n.d.

Web. 29 September 2003.

MacDonald, Dennis R. “The Shipwrecks of Odysseus and Paul.” New Testament Studies 45

(1999): 88-107. Ebscohost. Web. 3 February 2003.

Marlowe, Christopher. Doctor Faustus. The Norton Anthology of English Literature: The

Sixteenth Century; The Early Seventeenth Century. 7th ed. Vol. 1B. Gen. ed. M. H.

Abrams. Associate Gen. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt. New York: W. W. Norton, 2000.

991-1023. Print.

“Phenomenon.” The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. James Fieser. N. p., 1998. Web.

29 September 2003.

Pioch, Nicolas. “The Arnolfini Marriage.” Webmuseum, Paris. N. p., 2 July 2003. Web. 29

September 2003.

Rosen, Nathan. “Style and Structure in The Brothers Karamazov (The Grand Inquisitor and the

Russian Monk).” The Brothers Karamazov: The Constance Garnett Translation Revised

by Ralph E. Matlaw: Backgrounds and Sources: Essays in Criticism. Ed. Ralph E.

Matlaw. New York: W. W. Norton, 1976. 841-51. Print.

Schaeffer, Edith. Christianity is Jewish. Wheaton: Tyndale House, 1975. Print.

Tuya

Schaeffer, Francis A. How Should we then Live?: The Rise and Decline of Western Thought

and Culture. Old Tappan, N.J.: F. H. Revell, 1976. Print.

Schaeffer, Franky. Dancing Alone: The Quest for Orthodox Faith in the Age of False Religion.

Brookline: Holy Cross Orthodox Press, 1994. Print.

Scodel, Ruth. “The Removal of the Arms, the Recognition with Laertes, and Narrative Tension

in The Odyssey.” Classical Philology 93 (1998): 1-17. Academic Search Premier.

Web. 9 September 2003.

Shakespeare, William. Hamlet. New York: Dover, 1992. Print.

Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. New York: Dover, 1994. Print.

Singleton, Charles S. “The Vistas in Retrospect.” MLN 81 (1966): 55-80. JSTOR. Web. 3

March 2003.

Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Patience, and Pearl. Trans. Marie Borroff. New York: W.

W. Norton, 2001. Print.

Spenser, Edmund. The Faerie Queene. The Norton Anthology of English Literature: The

Sixteenth Century; The Early Seventeenth Century. 7th ed. Vol. 1B. Gen. ed. M. H.

Abrams. Associate Gen. Ed. Stephen Greenblatt. New York: W. W. Norton, 2000.

628-863. Print.

Smith, W. C. Me and my Shadow, Walking down the Avenue. New York: Wilson, 1991. Print.

. “You have Misjudged me: I am a Nice Guy!” Philanthropy 12.4 (1995): 133-57. Print.

Wasiolek, Edward. “The Brothers Karamazov: Idea and Technique.” The Brothers Karamazov:

The Constance Garnett Translation Revised by Ralph E. Matlaw: Backgrounds and

Sources: Essays in Criticism. Ed. Ralph E. Matlaw. New York: W. W. Norton, 1976.

813-21. Print.