Ignite combined uxpa2013_2013-7-10
-
Upload
uxpa-international -
Category
Technology
-
view
105 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Ignite combined uxpa2013_2013-7-10
2013
2013
2013
Jon StrohlFors Marsh Group
This is why my UX research method rocks!
2013
What it isIgnite is a geek event in over 100 cities worldwide. At the events Ignite presenters share their personal and professional passions, using 20 slides that auto-advance every 15 seconds for a total of just five minutes.
2013
• The optimal UX research method depends on many factors.
• The question being asked• The desire for attitudinal or behavioral data• The point of development of the design• The development process• The resources available• Desire for qualitative or quantitative data
• There is no single UX research method that can answer all of your questions.
• Best to take a toolkit approach
2013
• For the purposes of this session though, we are throwing level headedness to the wind!
• Presenters have been asked to select a UX research method that they are passionate about and campaign for your vote for the best UX Research Method.
2013
• Presenters have been given free reign as to how to structure their argument.
• Presenters can play nice.
2013
• Or play dirty
2013
• Why use this format?
• Allows audience to hear the best points of the different methods
• Provides insights into an argument that you could make for using a particular method
• Promotes a group discussion
2013
David Hawkins
• User Experience Researcher at Fors Marsh Group
• @dHawk87
Presentation: Structured in-lab usability testing
• Typically the first method thought of when usability testing is discussed
2013
Cory Lebson
• Principal User Experience Consultant at Lebsontech
• @corylebson
Presentation: Free form in-person usability testing
• A spin-off of structured testing
2013
Heather Gay
• Director of Research at Media Barn Inc.
• @heatherlgay
Presentation: Focus Groups• Participants discuss a
topic in a group session
2013
Jonathan Strohl
• UX Researcher at Fors Marsh Group
• @jonstrohl
Presentation: Ethnography• Observing and
interviewing participants in their natural environment.
2013
Jennifer Romano Bergstrom
• User Experience Lead at Fors Marsh Group
• @romanocog
Presentation: Moderated and unmoderated remote usability testing
• Performed at a different location than the participant
2013
Bryan Wiggins
• Senior Research Associate at Fors Marsh Group
• @bwigginsfmg
Presentation: Surveys• Participants respond to
written questions
2013
The Full LineupStructured In-Lab Testing
David Hawkins Fors Marsh Group
Free-form Testing Cory Lebson Lebsontech
Focus Groups Heather Gay Media Barn
Ethnography Jon Strohl Fors Marsh Group
Remote Testing Jennifer Romano Bergstrom
Fors Marsh Group
Surveys Bryan Wiggins Fors Marsh Group
2013
This is Why Structured In-lab Testing Rocks!David Hawkins, Fors Marsh Group
@dhawk87
@dHawk87
2013
Laboratories are Simulators
@dHawk87
2013
Why test in a lab?
@dHawk87
2013
High-risk Environments
@dHawk87
2013
Consistency
@dHawk87
2013
Experimental Control
@dHawk87
2013
Valid Conclusions
@dHawk87
2013
Direct Comparisons
@dHawk87
2013
Distraction Free Environments
@dHawk87
2013
Structured Tasks๏ All participants complete the same tasks in
the same order.
@dHawk87
2013
Naturalistic Task Flow๏ Design tasks in a logical progression.
@dHawk87
2013
Randomize and Counterbalance
@dHawk87
2013
Observe your product in use
@dHawk87
2013
Physiological Assessment
@dHawk87
2013
Memory is fallible
@dHawk87
2013
Eye Tracking
@dHawk87
2013
Galvanic Skin Response
@dHawk87
2013
Electroencephalograph (EEG)
@dHawk87
2013
ConclusionsStructured in-lab testing gives you:
๏ experimental control
๏ objective measurements
๏ valid conclusions
@dHawk87
2013
And THAT is Why Structured In-lab Testing Rocks!
@dHawk87
David Hawkins – @dHawk87
Cory Lebson - @corylebson Heather Gay - @heatherlgay
Jon Strohl - @jonstrohl
Jennifer Romano Bergstrom - @romanocog
Bryan Wiggins - bwigginsfmg
This is Why My UX Research Method Rocks!
2013
This is Why Free-Form Testing Rocks!
@corylebson
2013
We are hired to add value!
@corylebson
2013
We are not robots.
@corylebson
2013
Trapped by our script
@corylebson
2013
Let’s think outside the box
@corylebson
2013
Go with the flow.
@corylebson
2013
Connect with participants.
@corylebson
2013
Feel what they are feeling.
@corylebson
2013
And adapt.
@corylebson
2013
Synch with who they are.
@corylebson
2013
Will you corrupt your data?
@corylebson
2013
This isn’t quantitative!
@corylebson
2013
Focus on your end goal.
@corylebson
2013
You’ll gain more insights.
@corylebson
2013
Have more of an adventure
@corylebson
2013
Make stakeholders happy.
@corylebson
2013
Because you went beyond.
@corylebson
2013
But set expectations.
Please explain!
@corylebson
2013
And let your report jump out!
@corylebson
2013
To recap: be flexibleand you’ll be a superhero.
And THAT is Why Free-Form Testing rocks!
@corylebson
2013David Hawkins – @dHawk87
Cory Lebson - @corylebson Heather Gay - @heatherlgay
Jon Strohl - @jonstrohl
Jennifer Romano Bergstrom - @romanocog
Bryan Wiggins - bwigginsfmg
This is Why My UX Research Method Rocks!
2013 This Is WhyFocus Groups Rock!Heather GayDirector of Usability ResearchMediabarn Inc.
@heatherlgay
2013
Do It as a Group
@heatherlgay
2013
Have something to test?
@heatherlgay
2013
What is a Focus Group?
@heatherlgay
2013
User differences
@heatherlgay
2013
In-person groups
@heatherlgay
2013
Online groups
@heatherlgay
2013
You don’t know what you don’t know
@heatherlgay
2013
Why do a group?๏ You don’t have anything for users to use
๏ You’re not really sure what to build
๏ You want to test your initial assumptions
๏ You need fuel to innovate
๏ You need to acquire data to create a UX plan
๏ You need to identify important research questions
@heatherlgay
2013
@heatherlgay
2013
Exploratory Discussion
Barriers
Perceptions
DriversAttitudes
FeelingsBrand
Product
Concept
@heatherlgay
2013
Talking about features
@heatherlgay
2013
what doyou
Reallywant?
@heatherlgay
2013
How do you compare?
@heatherlgay
2013
What drives behavior?
@heatherlgay
2013
Find the Gems
@heatherlgay
2013
General to specific
@heatherlgay
2013
High-Level, Rich Feedback
@heatherlgay
2013
Best UX research method๏ Organic conversation in a group setting
๏ Online or in person
๏ Provide rich information on:- The reasons why users make decisions- The types of features that are important to
users- How users perceive you vs. your competition
@heatherlgay
2013 And THAT is why Focus Groups rock!Heather Gaywww.mediabarnresearch.comTwitter: @heatherlgay
@heatherlgay
2013David Hawkins – @dHawk87
Cory Lebson - @corylebson Heather Gay - @heatherlgay
Jon Strohl - @jonstrohl
Jennifer Romano Bergstrom - @romanocog
Bryan Wiggins - bwigginsfmg
This is Why My UX Research Method Rocks!
2013
@jonstrohl
This is Why Ethnography Rocks!
Jon Strohl
2013
@jonstrohl
2013
@jonstrohl
2013
2013
@jonstrohl
2013
@jonstrohl
2013
@jonstrohl
2013
@jonstrohl
2013
@jonstrohl
2013
@jonstrohl
2013
@jonstrohl
2013
@jonstrohl
2013
@jonstrohl
2013
@jonstrohl
2013
@jonstrohl
2013
@jonstrohl
2013
@jonstrohl
2013
@jonstrohl
2013
@jonstrohl
2013
And That is Why Ethnography Rocks!
@jonstrohl
2013David Hawkins – @dHawk87
Cory Lebson - @corylebson Heather Gay - @heatherlgay
Jon Strohl - @jonstrohl
Jennifer Romano Bergstrom - @romanocog
Bryan Wiggins - bwigginsfmg
This is Why My UX Research Method Rocks!
2013
This Is WhyRemote Testing Rocks!Jennifer Romano BergstromUser Experience Research LeaderFors Marsh Group
@romanocog
2013
Remote Testing = Running sessions
from afar
@romanocog
2013
Moderated Remote Testing
Un-moderated Remote Testing
@romanocog
2013
Working from home
@romanocog
2013Observe
r, unseen
Participant at home
Moderator at the
office
@romanocog
2013
Participants in natural environment
@romanocog
2013
Busy participant in natural
environment
@romanocog
2013
Hard to reach populations
Hard to reach participants
@romanocog
2013
Hard to reach participants in natural environment
@romanocog
2013
Un-moderated Sessions = Reach lots of people fast
@romanocog
2013
Interview a lot of people quickly
Un-moderated Sessions = Lots of data fast
@romanocog
2013
Sample from the country…or the
world
Collect data from participants in your hometown
@romanocog
2013
Collect data from participants all over the country
@romanocog
2013
Collect data from participants all over the world
@romanocog
2013
No travel costs
@romanocog
2013
No traffic
@romanocog
2013
No annoying fellow travelers
@romanocog
2013
No getting sick
@romanocog
2013
No jet lag
@romanocog
2013
More time for family, friends, and fun
@romanocog
2013
And THAT is why Remote Testing rocks!Jennifer Romano Bergstromwww.forsmarshgroup.com@forsmarshgroup
@romanocog
2013David Hawkins – @dHawk87
Cory Lebson - @corylebson Heather Gay - @heatherlgay
Jon Strohl - @jonstrohl
Jennifer Romano Bergstrom - @romanocog
Bryan Wiggins - bwigginsfmg
This is Why My UX Research Method Rocks!
2013
Web Surveys as Part of the UX ProcessBryan Wiggins, Fors Marsh Group
This is Why Surveys Rock!
@bwigginsfmg
2013
Types of Web Surveys๏ Site Intercept
๏ Surveys of Registered Users
๏ Customer Satisfaction Surveys
@bwigginsfmg
2013
Site Intercept Surveys๏ Pros: Actual visitors
๏ Cons: Nonresponse bias
@bwigginsfmg
2013
Surveys of Registered Users๏ Pros: Engaged users
๏ Cons: Must create an account
@bwigginsfmg
2013
Customer Satisfaction Surveys ๏ Pros: Actual customers, can evaluate product
or service
๏ Cons: Why didn’t customers purchase?
Photo by: McFlickr
@bwigginsfmg
2013
Advantages of Web Surveys๏ 1. Actual Users/Customers
Photo by: dustball
@bwigginsfmg
2013
Advantages of Web Surveys๏ 2. Real-Time Feedback
@bwigginsfmg
2013
Advantages of Web Surveys๏ 3. Large amount of feedback
Photo courtesy of: Boston Public
Library
@bwigginsfmg
2013
Disadvantages of Web Surveys๏ 1. Nonresponse bias
Photo courtesy of: Boston Public
Library
Photo by: Bahai.us
@bwigginsfmg
2013
Disadvantages of Web Surveys๏ 2. How do you fix the problem?
Photo courtesy of: Boston Public
Library
Photo by: Bahai.us
Photo by: osseous
@bwigginsfmg
2013
Surveys as Part of Evaluation Process
User Surveys
@bwigginsfmg
2013
Evaluation Method: Focus Groups๏ Pros: Gather feedback at various stages of
development
๏ Cons: Not actual users or specific issues
@bwigginsfmg
2013
Evaluation Method: In-Person Usability Testing๏ Pros: Feedback on specific site issues
๏ Cons: Testing environment
@bwigginsfmg
2013
Evaluation Method: Remote Usability Testing๏ Pros: Access to diverse/busy/hard to recruit
groups
๏ Cons: Less control and flexibility
@bwigginsfmg
2013
Evaluation Method: Free Form Testing๏ Pros: Greater flexibility
๏ Cons: Not structured or quantitative
@bwigginsfmg
2013
Evaluation Method: Ethnography๏ Pros: Naturalistic
๏ Cons: Time consuming
@bwigginsfmg
2013
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Methods
@bwigginsfmg
2013
Developmental and Evaluative Methods
@bwigginsfmg
2013
Unified Approach to UX
Photo courtesy of: Boston Public
Library
Photo by: Bahai.us
Photo by: Sweetie187
@bwigginsfmg
2013
Web Surveys Are One Piece of the Puzzle
Photo courtesy of: Boston Public
Library
Photo by: Bahai.us
Bryan Wiggins [email protected]
Photo by: yann.co.nz
@bwigginsfmg
2013David Hawkins – @dHawk87
Cory Lebson - @corylebson Heather Gay - @heatherlgay
Jon Strohl - @jonstrohl
Jennifer Romano Bergstrom - @romanocog
Bryan Wiggins - bwigginsfmg
This is Why My UX Research Method Rocks!