IFC 2015 Digital Strategy Masterclass
-
Upload
colin-habberton -
Category
Government & Nonprofit
-
view
446 -
download
0
Transcript of IFC 2015 Digital Strategy Masterclass
Transform your digital strategy: New ideas from unexpected places
Colin Habberton IFC Masterclass The Netherlands
20/21 October 2015
• This session will provide an in-depth analysis of the potential and practice of digital strategy for the developing world.
• It will look at the similarities and differences of digital campaigning from across the world through a series of deep dive case studies from commercial and nonprofit sectors.
Session Summary
Aimed at: • It is aimed at fundraisers who are
currently implementing or intending to implement digital fundraising strategies in developing markets.
Learning outcomes: • This Masterclass will highlight the
challenges, unpack the opportunities and provide delegates with a workable toolkit for their own organisation or campaign.
Session Summary
Today • Introductions • Objectives • The ‘Developing’ World • The State of the Digital Nation • What is Strategy? • Innovation • Case Studies
Session Overview
Tomorrow
• Experimentation
• Toolkits
• Application
• Collaboration
• Evaluation
Session Overview
Speaker Introduction
• GivenGain Foundation - Social Fundraising Platform
• Born in Stellenbosch, South Africa - Launched 2001 (2009 & 2015) - 1800+ Causes Worldwide - 50+ Countries - 10,000+ Projects - 8000+ Activists (Peer to Peer) - 110,000+ Donors - 180+ Countries
• One World. Zero Barriers.
Stellenbosch
Cape Town
Team Introductions
• What is your name?
• Where are you from?
• Where are you now?
• What is important to you?
• What makes you, you?
Question:
I’d like to know how you plan to “format”
your session in terms of lecture/
presentation/interactive discussion/
exercises, etc.?
Session Overview
Answer: • multi-disciplinary format
• coverage of theoretical material
• case studies
• encourage sharing
• few exercises
• practical review of some tools
Session Overview
Today • Introductions
• Objectives
• The ‘Developing’ World
• What is strategy?
• Innovation
• Fundraising case studies
Session Overview
Objectives
My objectives:
• The potential and practice of digital strategy
• Similarities and differences from across the world
• Deep dive case studies: commercial and nonprofit
• Highlight the challenges
• Unpack the opportunities
• Workable toolkit
Objectives
Your objectives? • “I’d like to learn more about online, internet and especially
mobile fundraising, since mobiles are such a significant factor in developing countries.”
• “…catch up with the modern expectaAons and learn new techniques”
• “…online payment opAons that are the best to offer in different countries/regions. How/why they work and don’t work, etc.”
• “cultural, logisAcal, and other differences that must be considered when engaging people from a variety of countries”
• “…transferable new perspecAves on creaAng digital strategies for chariAes in the UK market.”
• Others?
Good or Bad Memories?
Our Periodic Table?
Locality • Switzerland, UK, Netherlands, Malaysia, France, USA,
Spain, Canada, Indonesia, Hungary (& South Africa) Reach • UK, Hungary, Latin America, India, Hong Kong, Korea
and Japan Experience • Marketing, Communication, Digital Media, Client
Relationships, Founder, CEO Fundraising Skills • DM, F2F, Digital, DRTV, International
The ‘Developing’ World
Planetary Disruption • Climate Change • Resource Shortages
Political Disruption • Extremism • Destabilisation
Economic Disruption • Financial Volatility • Rampant Inequality
Systemic Disruption • Changing Technology • Information Access
Our World
Our World
: (Adapted: Piketty, 2014: Capital in the 21st Century)
Our World
: (Adapted: Piketty, 2014: Capital in the 21st Century)
Our World
: (Adapted: Piketty, 2014: Capital in the 21st Century)
The ‘Developing’ World?
BurkinaFaso
DominicanRepublic Puerto
Rico (US)
U.S. VirginIslands (US)
St. Kittsand Nevis
Antigua and Barbuda
Dominica
St. Lucia
Barbados
Grenada
Trinidadand Tobago
St. Vincent andthe Grenadines
R.B. de Venezuela
Martinique (Fr)
Guadeloupe (Fr)
St. Martin (Fr)
St. Maarten (Neth)
Curaçao (Neth)
Aruba (Neth)
Poland
Czech RepublicSlovak Republic
Ukraine
Austria
Germany
SanMarino
Italy
SloveniaCroatia
Bosnia andHerzegovina Serbia
Hungary
Romania
Bulgaria
AlbaniaGreece
FYRMacedonia
Samoa
AmericanSamoa (US)
TongaFiji
Kiribati
French Polynesia (Fr)
N. Mariana Islands (US)
Guam (US)
Palau
Federated States of Micronesia Marshall Islands
Nauru Kiribati
SolomonIslands
Tuvalu
Vanuatu Fiji
NewCaledonia
(Fr)
HaitiJamaica
CubaCayman Is.(UK)
The Bahamas
Turks and Caicos Is. (UK)
Bermuda(UK)
United States
Canada
Mexico
PanamaCosta Rica
NicaraguaHonduras
El SalvadorGuatemala
Belize
ColombiaFrench Guiana (Fr)
GuyanaSuriname
R.B. deVenezuela
Ecuador
Peru Brazil
Bolivia
Paraguay
ChileArgentina
Uruguay
Greenland(Den)
NorwayIceland
Isle of Man (UK)
IrelandUnited
Kingdom
FaeroeIslands(Den) Sweden Finland
DenmarkEstonia
LatviaLithuania
Poland
RussianFed.
Belarus
UkraineMoldova
Romania
Bulgaria
Greece
Italy
GermanyBelgium
The Netherlands
LuxembourgChannel Islands (UK)
SwitzerlandLiechtenstein France
Andorra
PortugalSpain
Monaco
Gibraltar (UK)Malta
Morocco
Tunisia
Algeria
WesternSahara
Mauritania
Mali
SenegalThe Gambia
Guinea-Bissau Guinea
Cabo Verde
Sierra Leone
Liberia
Côted’Ivoire
Ghana
Togo
Benin
Niger
Nigeria
Libya Arab Rep.of Egypt
Sudan
SouthSudan
Chad
Cameroon
CentralAfrican
Republic
Equatorial GuineaSão Tomé and Príncipe
Gabon Congo
Angola
Dem.Rep.ofCongo
Eritrea
Djibouti
Ethiopia
Somalia
KenyaUganda
RwandaBurundi
Tanzania
Zambia Malawi
MozambiqueZimbabwe
BotswanaNamibia
Swaziland
LesothoSouthAfrica
Madagascar Mauritius
Seychelles
Comoros
Mayotte(Fr)
Réunion (Fr)
Rep. of Yemen
Oman
United ArabEmirates
QatarBahrain
SaudiArabia
KuwaitIsraelWest Bank and Gaza Jordan
LebanonSyrianArabRep.
Cyprus
IraqIslamic Rep.
of Iran
TurkeyAzer-baijanArmenia
Georgia
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Afghanistan
Tajikistan
KyrgyzRep.
Pakistan
India
BhutanNepal
Bangladesh
Myanmar
SriLanka
Maldives
Thailand
LaoP.D.R.
VietnamCambodia
Singapore
MalaysiaBrunei Darussalam
Philippines
Papua New GuineaIndonesia
Australia
NewZealand
JapanRep.ofKorea
Dem.People’sRep.of Korea
Mongolia
China
Russian Federation
Antarctica
Timor-Leste
VaticanCity
IBRD 41312 NOVEMBER 2014
KosovoMontenegro
Classified according to World Bank estimates of
2013 GNI per capita
The world by income
Low ($1,045 or less)
Lower middle ($1,046–$4,125)
Upper middle ($4,126–$12,745)
High ($12,746 or more) No data
Economic Growth
Romania
Serbia
Greece
SanMarino
Bulg
aria
Ukra
ine
Germ
any
FYRMacedonia
Croatia
Bosnia andHerzegovina
CzechRepublic
Poland
Hungary
Italy
Austria
Slovenia
SlovakRepublic
KosovoMontenegro
Albania
DominicanRepublic
Trinidad andTobago
GrenadaSt. Vincent andthe Grenadines
Dominica
PuertoRico, US
St. Kittsand Nevis
Antigua andBarbuda
St. LuciaBarbados
R.B. de Venezuela
U.S. VirginIslands (US)
Martinique (Fr)
Guadeloupe (Fr)
St. Martin (Fr)
Anguilla (UK)St. Maarten (Neth)
Curaçao(Neth)
BurkinaFaso
Samoa
TongaFiji
Kiribati
Palau
Federated Statesof Micronesia
MarshallIslands
NauruKiribati
SolomonIslands
Tuvalu
Vanuatu Fiji
Haiti
Jamaica
CubaThe Bahamas
United States
Canada
PanamaCosta Rica
Nicaragua
Honduras
El SalvadorGuatemala
Mexico
Belize
Colombia
GuyanaSuriname
R.B. deVenezuela
Ecuador
Peru Brazil
Bolivia
Paraguay
Chile
Argentina Uruguay
Norway
Iceland
Ireland
UnitedKingdom
Sweden Finland
Denmark
EstoniaLatvia
Lithuania
Poland Belarus
UkraineMoldova
Romania
Bulgaria
GreeceItaly
GermanyBelgium
The Netherlands
Luxembourg
Switzerland
LiechtensteinFrance
AndorraPortugalSpain Monaco
Malta
MoroccoTunisia
Algeria
MauritaniaMali
SenegalThe
GambiaGuinea-Bissau
Guinea
CaboVerde
Sierra LeoneLiberia
Côted’Ivoire
Ghana
Togo
Benin
Niger
Nigeria
Libya Arab Rep.of Egypt
Chad
Cameroon
CentralAfrican
Republic
Equatorial GuineaSão Tomé and Príncipe
GabonCongo
Angola
Dem.Rep.of Congo
Eritrea
Djibouti
Ethiopia
Somalia
KenyaUganda
RwandaBurundi
Tanzania
ZambiaMalawi
MozambiqueMadagascarZimbabwe
BotswanaNamibia
Swaziland
LesothoSouthAfrica
Mauritius
SeychellesComoros
Rep. ofYemen
Oman
United ArabEmirates
QatarBahrain
SaudiArabia
Kuwait
IsraelJordan
Lebanon
SyrianArabRep.
Cyprus
IraqIslamic Rep.
of Iran
Turkey
Azer-baijanArmenia
Georgia
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Afghanistan
Tajikistan
KyrgyzRep.
Pakistan
India
BhutanNepal
Bangladesh
Myanmar
SriLanka
Maldives
Thailand
LaoP.D.R.
Vietnam
Cambodia
Singapore
Malaysia
Philippines
PapuaNew Guinea
Indones ia
Australia
NewZealand
JapanRep.ofKorea
Dem.People’sRep.of Korea
Mongolia
China
Russian Federation
BruneiDarussalam
Sudan
SouthSudan
Timor-Leste
AmericanSamoa (US)
FrenchPolynesia (Fr)
N. Mariana Islands (US)
Guam (US)
NewCaledonia
(Fr)
Bermuda(UK)
French Guiana (Fr)
Greenland(Den)
West Bank and Gaza
Turks and Caicos Is. (UK)
WesternSahara
Réunion(Fr)
Mayotte(Fr)
IBRD 41453
Less than 0.0
0.0–1.9
2.0–3.9
4.0–5.9
6.0 or more
No data
Economic growth
AVERAGE ANNUAL GROWTH OFGDP PER CAPITA, 2009–13 (%)
Europe insetCaribbean inset
Poverty Levels
Romania
Serbia
Greece
SanMarino
Bulg
aria
Ukra
ine
Germ
any
FYRMacedonia
Croatia
Bosnia andHerzegovina
CzechRepublic
Poland
Hungary
Italy
Austria
Slovenia
SlovakRepublic
KosovoMontenegro
Albania
Europe insetDominicanRepublic
Trinidad andTobago
GrenadaSt. Vincent andthe Grenadines
Dominica
PuertoRico, US
St. Kittsand Nevis
Antigua andBarbuda
St. LuciaBarbados
R.B. de Venezuela
U.S. VirginIslands (US)
Martinique (Fr)
Guadeloupe (Fr)
Curaçao(Neth)
St. Martin (Fr)
Anguilla (UK)St. Maarten (Neth)
Caribbean inset
BurkinaFaso
Samoa
TongaFiji
Kiribati
Palau
Federated Statesof Micronesia
MarshallIslands
NauruKiribati
SolomonIslands
Tuvalu
Vanuatu Fiji
Haiti
Jamaica
CubaThe Bahamas
United States
Canada
PanamaCosta Rica
Nicaragua
Honduras
El SalvadorGuatemala
Mexico
Belize
Colombia
GuyanaSurinameR.B. de
Venezuela
Ecuador
Peru Brazil
Bolivia
Paraguay
Chile
Argentina Uruguay
Norway
Iceland
Ireland
UnitedKingdom
Sweden Finland
Denmark
EstoniaLatvia
Lithuania
Poland Belarus
UkraineMoldova
Romania
Bulgaria
GreeceItaly
GermanyBelgium
The Netherlands
Luxembourg
Switzerland
LiechtensteinFrance
AndorraPortugalSpain Monaco
Malta
MoroccoTunisia
Algeria
MauritaniaMali
SenegalThe
GambiaGuinea-Bissau
Guinea
CaboVerde
Sierra LeoneLiberia
Côted’Ivoire
Ghana
Togo
Benin
Niger
Nigeria
Libya Arab Rep.of Egypt
Chad
Cameroon
CentralAfrican
Republic
Equatorial GuineaSão Tomé and Príncipe
GabonCongo
Angola
Dem.Rep.of Congo
Eritrea
Djibouti
Ethiopia
Somalia
KenyaUganda
RwandaBurundi
Tanzania
ZambiaMalawi
MozambiqueZimbabwe
BotswanaNamibia
Swaziland
LesothoSouthAfrica
Madagascar
Mauritius
SeychellesComoros
Rep. ofYemen
Oman
United ArabEmirates
QatarBahrain
SaudiArabia
Kuwait
IsraelJordan
Lebanon
SyrianArabRep.
Cyprus
Iraq Islamic Rep.of Iran
Turkey
Azer-baijanArmenia
Georgia
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Afghanistan
Tajikistan
KyrgyzRep.
Pakistan
India
BhutanNepal
Bangladesh
Myanmar
SriLanka
Maldives
Thailand
LaoP.D.R.
Vietnam
Cambodia
Singapore
Malaysia
Philippines
PapuaNew Guinea
Indones ia
Australia
NewZealand
JapanRep.ofKorea
Dem.People’sRep.of Korea
Mongolia
China
Russian Federation
BruneiDarussalam
Sudan
SouthSudan
Timor-Leste
AmericanSamoa (US)
FrenchPolynesia (Fr)
N. Mariana Islands (US)
Guam (US)
NewCaledonia
(Fr)
French Guiana (Fr)
Greenland(Den)
West Bank and Gaza
Turks and Caicos Is. (UK)
WesternSahara
Réunion(Fr)
Mayotte(Fr)
IBRD 41450
50.0 or more
25.0–49.9
10.0–24.9
2.0–9.9
Less than 2.0
No data
Poverty
SHARE OF POPULATION LIVING ONLESS THAN $1.25 A DAY, 2011 (%)
Bermuda(UK)
Investment Flows
Romania
Serbia
Greece
SanMarino
Bulg
aria
Ukra
ine
Germ
any
FYRMacedonia
Croatia
Bosnia andHerzegovina
CzechRepublic
Poland
Hungary
Italy
Austria
Slovenia
SlovakRepublic
KosovoMontenegro
Albania
DominicanRepublic
Trinidad andTobago
GrenadaSt. Vincent andthe Grenadines
Dominica
PuertoRico, US
St. Kittsand Nevis
Antigua andBarbuda
St. LuciaBarbados
R.B. de Venezuela
U.S. VirginIslands (US)
Martinique (Fr)
Guadeloupe (Fr)
Curaçao(Neth)
St. Martin (Fr)
Anguilla (UK)St. Maarten (Neth)
BurkinaFaso
Samoa
TongaFiji
Kiribati
Palau
Federated Statesof Micronesia
MarshallIslands
NauruKiribati
SolomonIslands
Tuvalu
Vanuatu Fiji
Haiti
Jamaica
CubaThe Bahamas
United States
Canada
PanamaCosta Rica
Nicaragua
Honduras
El SalvadorGuatemala
Mexico
Belize
Colombia
GuyanaSuriname
R.B. deVenezuela
Ecuador
Peru Brazil
Bolivia
Paraguay
Chile
Argentina Uruguay
Norway
Iceland
Ireland
UnitedKingdom
Sweden Finland
Denmark
EstoniaLatvia
Lithuania
Poland Belarus
UkraineMoldova
Romania
Bulgaria
GreeceItaly
GermanyBelgium
The Netherlands
Luxembourg
Switzerland
LiechtensteinFrance
AndorraPortugalSpain Monaco
Malta
MoroccoTunisia
Algeria
MauritaniaMali
SenegalThe
GambiaGuinea-Bissau
Guinea
CaboVerde
Sierra LeoneLiberia
Côted’Ivoire
Ghana
Togo
Benin
Niger
Nigeria
Libya Arab Rep.of Egypt
Chad
Cameroon
CentralAfrican
Republic
Equatorial GuineaSão Tomé and Príncipe
GabonCongo
Angola
Dem.Rep.of Congo
Eritrea
Djibouti
Ethiopia
Somalia
KenyaUganda
RwandaBurundi
Tanzania
ZambiaMalawi
MozambiqueMadagascarZimbabwe
BotswanaNamibia
Swaziland
LesothoSouthAfrica
Mauritius
SeychellesComoros
Rep. ofYemen
Oman
United ArabEmirates
QatarBahrain
SaudiArabia
Kuwait
IsraelJordan
Lebanon
SyrianArabRep.
Cyprus
Iraq Islamic Rep.of Iran
Turkey
Azer-baijanArmenia
Georgia
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Afghanistan
Tajikistan
KyrgyzRep.
Pakistan
India
BhutanNepal
Bangladesh
Myanmar
SriLanka
Maldives
Thailand
LaoP.D.R.
Vietnam
Cambodia
Singapore
Malaysia
Philippines
PapuaNew Guinea
Indones ia
Australia
NewZealand
JapanRep.ofKorea
Dem.People’sRep.of Korea
Mongolia
China
Russian Federation
BruneiDarussalam
Sudan
SouthSudan
Timor-Leste
AmericanSamoa (US)
FrenchPolynesia (Fr)
N. Mariana Islands (US)
Guam (US)
NewCaledonia
(Fr)
French Guiana (Fr)
Greenland(Den)
West Bank and Gaza
Turks and Caicos Is. (UK)
WesternSahara
Réunion(Fr)
Mayotte(Fr)
IBRD 41455
Less than 1.0
1.0–1.9
2.0–3.9
4.0–5.9
6.0 or more
No data
Foreign direct investment
FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT NETINFLOWS AS A SHARE OF GDP, 2013 (%)
Europe insetCaribbean inset
Bermuda(UK)
Internet Usage
Romania
Serbia
Greece
SanMarino
Bulg
aria
Ukra
ine
Germ
any
FYRMacedonia
Croatia
Bosnia andHerzegovina
CzechRepublic
Poland
Hungary
Italy
Austria
Slovenia
SlovakRepublic
KosovoMontenegro
Albania
DominicanRepublic
Trinidad andTobago
GrenadaSt. Vincent andthe Grenadines
Dominica
PuertoRico, US
St. Kittsand Nevis
Antigua andBarbuda
St. LuciaBarbados
R.B. de Venezuela
U.S. VirginIslands (US)
Martinique (Fr)
Guadeloupe (Fr)
Curaçao(Neth)
St. Martin (Fr)
Anguilla (UK)St. Maarten (Neth)
BurkinaFaso
Samoa
TongaFiji
Kiribati
Palau
Federated Statesof Micronesia
MarshallIslands
NauruKiribati
SolomonIslands
Tuvalu
Vanuatu Fiji
Haiti
Jamaica
CubaThe Bahamas
United States
Canada
PanamaCosta Rica
Nicaragua
Honduras
El SalvadorGuatemala
Mexico
Belize
Colombia
GuyanaSuriname
R.B. deVenezuela
Ecuador
Peru Brazil
Bolivia
Paraguay
Chile
Argentina Uruguay
Norway
Iceland
Ireland
UnitedKingdom
Sweden Finland
Denmark
EstoniaLatvia
Lithuania
Poland Belarus
UkraineMoldova
Romania
Bulgaria
GreeceItaly
GermanyBelgium
The Netherlands
Luxembourg
Switzerland
LiechtensteinFrance
AndorraPortugalSpain Monaco
Malta
MoroccoTunisia
Algeria
MauritaniaMali
SenegalThe
GambiaGuinea-Bissau
Guinea
CaboVerde
Sierra LeoneLiberia
Côted’Ivoire
Ghana
Togo
Benin
Niger
Nigeria
Libya Arab Rep.of Egypt
Chad
Cameroon
CentralAfrican
Republic
Equatorial GuineaSão Tomé and Príncipe
GabonCongo
Angola
Dem.Rep.of Congo
Eritrea
Djibouti
Ethiopia
Somalia
KenyaUganda
RwandaBurundi
Tanzania
ZambiaMalawi
MozambiqueMadagascarZimbabwe
BotswanaNamibia
Swaziland
LesothoSouthAfrica
Mauritius
SeychellesComoros
Rep. ofYemen
Oman
United ArabEmirates
QatarBahrain
SaudiArabia
Kuwait
IsraelJordan
Lebanon
SyrianArabRep.
Cyprus
IraqIslamic Rep.
of Iran
Turkey
Azer-baijanArmenia
Georgia
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Kazakhstan
Afghanistan
Tajikistan
KyrgyzRep.
Pakistan
India
BhutanNepal
Bangladesh
Myanmar
SriLanka
Maldives
Thailand
LaoP.D.R.
Vietnam
Cambodia
Singapore
Malaysia
Philippines
PapuaNew Guinea
Indones ia
Australia
NewZealand
JapanRep.ofKorea
Dem.People’sRep.of Korea
Mongolia
China
Russian Federation
BruneiDarussalam
Sudan
SouthSudan
Timor-Leste
AmericanSamoa (US)
FrenchPolynesia (Fr)
N. Mariana Islands (US)
Guam (US)
NewCaledonia
(Fr)
French Guiana (Fr)
Greenland(Den)
West Bank and Gaza
Turks and Caicos Is. (UK)
WesternSahara
Réunion(Fr)
Mayotte(Fr)
IBRD 41454
Fewer than 20
20–39
40–59
60–79
80 or more
No data
Internet users
INDIVIDUALS USING THE INTERNET AS A SHARE OF POPULATION, 2013
Europe insetCaribbean inset
Bermuda(UK)
• US$2.3 trillion in
global aid since 1950 (World Bank)
• US$1 trillion in Aid to Africa
• 6 Marshall Plans equivalent to US$5,000/person (Richard Dowden, Royal Africa
Society)
Aid and Income Growth in Africa (10-year moving average)
02468
101214161820
1970
1973
197619
79198
219
8519
88199
1199
419
9720
00
Aid
/GN
I (%
)
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Gro
wth
GD
P/C
apita
(%
)
Aid/GNI Growth GDP/Capita
Solutions: Aid?
• Definition of ‘developing’?
• Motives & intent?
• Local or global?
• Inflow or outflow?
• Invest or Extract?
• Transactions?
• Relationships?
The ‘Developing’ World
Our Global Challenges
The State of the Digital Nation
An authorised financial services provider – FSP 43441 Source: h+p://wearesocial.sg/blog/2014/11/internet-‐users-‐pass-‐3-‐billion/
Thresholds…
Hype and scale…
Source: M+R Benchmarks Study 2014
Benchmarks 2014
Source: M+R Benchmarks Study 2014
Benchmarks 2014
Source: M+R Benchmarks Study 2015
Benchmarks 2015
1. Internet of Me – Personalised World
2. Outcome Economy – Digital/Physical Blur
3. Intelligent Enterprise – Smart Decisions & Delivery
4. Workforce Reimagined – Workforce to Crowdsource
5. Platform (R)evolution – Harnessing Hyperscale
(Source: Accenture Technology Vision 2015 )
Digital ‘Megatrends’
What is strategy?
Q:
• What do you call an investment that takes
two dollars to produce a dollar’s worth of
value?
A:
• Strategic
The MBA version
Q: • How do you buy a dollar for fifty cents? A: • Price is what you pay, value is what you get. • What counts is not what you know, it how well you
define what you don’t know. • I’d rather be certain of good outcome than hopeful of a
great one. • The size of your circle of competence is not what
important, knowing it boundaries, however, is vital.
The Buffet version
Innovation
What is Innovation? “Innovation is a new idea, more effective device or process…something original… better solutions
that meet new requirements and needs…that break into the market or society.”
(Wikipedia)
Three Kinds of Innovation
• Performance-improving innovations – Replace the old with new, better models – Substitutive e.g. Camry to Prius
• Efficiency innovations – Same products & customers, cheaper prices – Improve productivity, resource allocation – e.g. Supermarkets, Downsizing
• Market-creating innovations – Transforms products, create new customers – Changes needs, resource/skill/access dependent – e.g. computers, internet, nonprofits
(Source: Christensen & van Bever. 2014. The Capitalists Dilemma. Harvard Business Review)
The Eisner Principle
“Think inside the box”
• Disruption & discomfort – Complexity of context
• Increasing needs – Volatile tension
• Demands from funders – Accountability
• Digital convergence – Demands on skillsets
• Change is inevitable – Pervasive, punishing
The box we live in
• Resource constraints – Doing more with less
• The Madding Crowd – Breaking through the noise
• Relevance of purpose – Who cares about what?
• Connectivity challenges – Device & delivery
• Attracting talent – Skills ≠ Experience
The box we live in
Case Studies
The Unicorns
It began as a grassroots effort by Pete Frates, a 29 year-old Massachusetts man and
athlete who has lived with ALS since 2012 and Jeanette Senerchia of upstate New York,
whose husband, Anthony Senerchia, has had the disease for over a decade.
Inspired by Jeanette, Pat Quinn challenged 50 friends…
#IceBucketChallenge
• 8000 to 430 000 Wikipedia views/day
• 2.2 million mentions on Twitter
• 1.2 mentions on Facebook
• $100 million (ALS US)
• $2.5 million in 2013
• £6m (Motor Neuron Disease, UK)
• €1m (ALS Netherlands)
• And many others…
#IceBucketChallenge
• ALS (Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) Association
• Strong, coordinated effort underlying success:
• user-friendly website
• strong storytelling, and
• a solid donor management system.
• The ALS Association was prepared…
• Big, selfless, simple idea
• The audience effect
• Personal nominations by friends
• Sense of urgency
#IceBucketChallenge
• Launched November 2012 – Song top 10 on iTunes
• Close to 100 million views – 4.8 million shares, – most shared ad of all time – various spin-offs
• Dumb Ways to Die 2 game – the top app in 83 countries, – four billion mini-game plays in just
three months • Most awarded campaign in the
history of Cannes – 28 Lions, incl 5 Grand Prix.
• 127 million people said they would be safer around trains
(Source: mccann.com.au)
Melbourne Metro
Melbourne Metro
Today • Case Studies
• Experimentation
• Toolkits
• Application • Collaboration
• Evaluation
Session Overview
GivenGain Ecosystem
Background
• GivenGain Foundation - Social Fundraising Platform
• Born in Stellenbosch, South Africa - Launched 2001 (2009 & 2015) - 200 - 1800+ Causes Worldwide - 15 - 50+ Countries - 0 - 8000+ Activists (Peer to Peer) - $38 - $100 million in donations - 33,000 - 110,000+ Donors - 1,600 -10,000+ Projects/campaigns - 180+ Countries
• One World. Zero Barriers.
(Source: Qmee & My Clever Agency, 2013) (Source: Qmee & My Clever Agency, 2013)
Team
Organisation/Cause
Partner/ Supplier
Beneficiary
Training & Incentives
Dia
logu
e &
Pr
ofile
Effective Solutions
Con
tent
&
Insi
ght
Efficient Im
pact
Quality Assurance
Funder/Donor
Competitor Cause
returns/reinvestment
marketing/mindshare
Community Responsibilities
Environmental Concerns
Market & Industry Conditions
Legal & Ethical Regulations
(Adapted from: Habberton, 2005)
Stakeholder Analysis
GivenGain Platform
Payment Processing
For Causes…
For Supporters…
The Cows (CHOC)
P2P Fundraising Phenomenon
• Started off as a memorial ride for
a mother who lost her daughter
• 6 People in Cow suits
• Now, 1000+ Activists/Fundraisers
• Raised over $2 million in 6 years
• Event based fundraising
• Mass participation
• Supported administration
• Inspired the local sector
charity: water (US)
/
That Was Different (CPT)
Size doesn’t matter…
Charity Water
Birthday campaign (ongoing)
• Success factors: easy, fun, broad
range of appeal, outstanding support
to fundraisers, peer-to-peer
influence, personalisation
• Integration with other campaigns,
e.g. World Water Day 2012
• Recruitment of fundraisers: videos,
social media, email, and through
celebrity ambassadors
19 million birthdays pledges,
$9 million raised
Charity Water
World Water Day 2013 campaign
• Hyper local event in New York City
• Walk in the foot steps of beneficiaries
• Online platforms to connect supporters
• Jerry can selfies at cross roads of cities
posted on social media
• Sharing of memeworthy images
• Twitter promoted tweets with
#WorldWaterDay
• Sharing of birthday campaign video to
encourage pledges
Charity Water
Its not about the tech…
• Multiple ideas that people can connect with • Flash mob dance event
• Bake-athon • High-heeled run in the park
• 135 Activists doing something different
• Human Rights Day 21 March 2013 • ZAR270 000+ by 477 donors
• Promotion through video, social media • Easy & fun
• Geek squad support
• TWD starter kit • GivenGain Facebook app
That Was Different
• Human Rights Day 21 March 2014
• Hyper local event in Cape Town
• Connecting with international supporters via social media
• Idea Generator
• Individual and Group Activist projects
• Manicures in old-age homes
• Hiking up Table Mountain
• Pizza-making marathon
• ZAR 300 000+
• 1400 participants
• GivenGain Facebook app
That Was Different
charity: water ($millions) • Creative options but pro-actively
promoting birthday pledges • Photos, videos, media kit, cover
photos, backgrounds, web banners, etc.
• Highly personal appeal • Marketing: Shareable videos • Multiple channels reinforcing
message • Eye-catching imagery used
consistently social media and communications
• Transparent about impact • Video and photos for impact
That was Different ($thousands) • Promotes creative individual &
group activities • Dedicated admin/support to
Activists via multiple channels • PDF Starter Kit • Directed to friends & family • Marketing: Shareable videos • Multiple channels reinforcing key
message: website, email, social media
• Variety of striking images used • Transparent about impact • Video and photos for impact
Key Success Factors
Red Cross (Kenya)
• Westgate Tragedy – 21-24 September 2013 – 67 Killed, 175 Injured
• Relief & Victims Fund – Using Mpesa
• Mobile Payment System – Running off Operator Billing – Peer to Peer Payments
• Significant Success – Over US$600k in 3 days
5 x 5 Experimentation
Background
• Michael Schrage, MIT Sloan – HBS book in 1999: Serious Play: How the
world’s best companies simulate to innovate – Mars, Procter & Gamble, Google, Intel, BT,
Siemens, NASDAQ, IBM, and Alcoa – Collaborative design with business experiments – Innovate faster, cheaper, better – Simple, safe, scalable – Human capital model of innovation – “Investment in customer futures..”
The Process
• Fast, frugal, high impact – 5 Diverse group of people – 5 Days to develop – 5 Business Experiments – 5 Weeks to run – $5,000 budget
• Business Experiment – Hypothesis – Replicable Test – Measurable Outcomes
The Process
• Business Hypothesis The team believes that exploring: 1. <Capability/Action> Will likely result in this: 2. <Desired Outcome> We’ll know this because: 3. <Our explicit metric> 4. <Significantly changed>
• Ideas are the enemy…
Great Vision
Great Problems
Great Arguments
Our 5 x 5 Experiment
• 3 Great Problems – Animal Protection – Tibet – Activating sports mania
• 3 Groups – 5 People per group – 1 Business experiments – 30 mins of group time – 5 mins per presentation – 5 mins feedback & questions
Business Case # 1
• Rex (Hungary) “Major income source (the 1% of citizens income tax) dropped back by 50% during the last 4-5 years. We urgently have to change our fundraising strategy, mainly if we wish to make true our planned developments (education centre, wildlife reserve, etc.)”
Business Case # 1
IN THE BOX
• Opportunity to offer 1% of citizens income tax (this source dropped back by 50%)
• Donations (offline and online) collection box. • DM/EDM: We send out 4 DM letters annually with a cheque to our
donors. (There are almost 13.000 addresses in our mailing/email list) • Volunteers (we have more than 1000 registered volunteers, but just
10% of them are regularly involved) • Legacies (we had only 3 legacies during the last 15 years) • Home page, Facebook,Youtube channel (in Hungarian only) • We organize 5/6 family events annually NOT IN THE BOX
• Intro film or DVD available • Corporate partnership (we don't especially search for sponsors, unless
they find us...) • Own mobile application (for donation or rehoming) • Almost no regular donors • Minimal number of major gifts
Business Case # 2
• The Blue Book (Tibet) “The Blue Book campaign is a fundraising programme that has for some 30 years raised funds for social welfare projects benefitting Tibetans living in exile in India. Every donor receives a “Blue Book” somewhat akin to a passport or savings book into which are pasted official Tibetan stamps representing the donations that have been made.”
Business Case # 2
STRENGTHS • It carries a very clear and focused message, namely to support social
welfare programmes. • By issuing a passport-like book to the donor, which can be filled with
stamps given in return for donations, it encourages the participant to continue to make donations on an annual basis.
• The Blue Book can be obtained in a variety of ways, either at an affiliated office of CTA in many countries around the world.
WEAKNESSES • The programme does not give enough information about the ways in
which money raised through the programme is used by CTA. • Receiving a special stamp each time a donation is made is a “nice
idea’. Logistics of actually giving a stamp for a donation is complicated. • The Blue Book could be an impediment to more frequent giving…bit
old-fashioned • The suggested amount, namely US$ 25 per year is a very low
donation compared to what most giving plans for charities are asking these days.
• There does not seem to be a strong marketing or fundraising push associated with this programme
Business Case # 3
• Sports teams?
Our 5 x 5 Experiment
• 3 Groups – 5 People max per group – 1 Business experiment – 30 mins of group time – 5 mins per presentation – 5 mins feedback & questions
• Business Hypothesis – The problem to be addressed – How you plan to address it – How you will measure its success
Our Toolkits
(Source: Qmee & My Clever Agency, 2013) (Source: Qmee & My Clever Agency, 2013)
Team
Organisation/Cause
Partner/ Supplier
Beneficiary
Training & Incentives
Dia
logu
e &
Pr
ofile
Effective Solutions
Con
tent
&
Insi
ght
Efficient Im
pact
Quality Assurance
Funder/Donor
Competitor Cause
returns/reinvestment
marketing/mindshare
Community Responsibilities
Environmental Concerns
Market & Industry Conditions
Legal & Ethical Regulations
(Adapted from: Habberton, 2005)
Stakeholder Analysis
DONORINDIVIDUALSGROUPSCOMPANIES
GIVENGAINFUNDRAISING PAGERAISE AWARENESS
CAUSETOOLS
TV
PRINTNEWSPAPERSFLYERS
OTHERWORD OF MOUTHFLYERSEVENTS
DIGITALSOCIAL MEDIAEMAILSMSRADIO
ONLINE ADSTV
WEBSITE
GALLERY & COMMENTSINFORMATION / ABOUTPROGRESSFAQSPONSORSPRIZESGET INVOLVEDDONATECONTACT
HOME
ANALYTICS
SEARCH
TIMELINE LAUNCH & MONITOR ANALYZE & IMPROVE
ANALYZE, REPORT & IMPROVEEMAIL SMS SUPPORT WEBSITE
SOCIAL MEDIA
PLANNING & PRE-LAUNCH
THEME RESEARCH WEBSITE EMAIL
GG PAGE TUTORIALS TEAM TASKS
BUDGET SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS
DATABASE
SPECIFYTIME FRAME
ANALYTICS
TRACKING
BRAND
PHASE 1 SPECIFYTIME FRAMEPHASE 2 SPECIFY
TIME FRAMEPHASE 3
ACTIVISTSFRIENDSFAMILYNETWORK
Some of the good news…
Relational Economics
(Source: HBR, Jan-Feb 2011)
Paradigm of Capital Shift
90
FINANCIAL CAPITAL MARKETS
Financial Return
Financial Performance Measurement
• Debt • Equity
• Retail (mutual funds, online brokers) • Institutional (Exchanges, Alternative
Trading Systems)
About 5%
FINANCIAL CAPITAL
MARKETS
$165 Trillion
(SOCIALLY) RESPONSIBLE
INVESTING Social Screening and Shareholder Advocacy
$7-45 Trillion
RETURN
MEASUREMENT
PLATFORMS
INVESTMENT TYPE
AVERAGE TRANSACTION
COST
MARKET SIZE
IMPACT INVESTING MARKETS
Financial + Social Return
Financial + Social Measurement
• Debt • Equity
• Retail (online micro finance) • Institutional (Impact Funds,
emerging platforms)
About 10%
$5 Billion
PHILANTHROPY (GIVING MARKETS)
Social Return
Social Performance Measurement
• Grants
• Retail (offline channels, online giving, Donor Advised Funds)
• Institutional (Foundations)
About 30%
$300 Billion
Source: Social Capital Markets / Markets For Good
(Adapted: Markets for Good, 2010)
Think like a Freak…
• People respond to incentives
Financial, Moral, Social, Herd
• Declared vs. revealed preferences Don’t listen to what people say, watch what they do
• Brian Mullaney: The Smile Train
“the most dysfunctional $300 billion industry in the world”
In 15 years, 1 million surgeries in 90 countries >100 staff
“Make one gift and we will never ask for another donation”
“The bottom line is the learning curve”
Final Thought
Learning Review
My objectives:
• The potential and practice of digital strategy
• Similarities and differences from across the world
• Deep dive case studies: commercial and nonprofit
• Highlight the challenges
• Unpack the opportunities
• Workable toolkit
Learning Review
Your objectives? • “I’d like to learn more about online, internet and especially
mobile fundraising, since mobiles are such a significant factor in developing countries.”
• “…catch up with the modern expectaAons and learn new techniques”
• “…online payment opAons that are the best to offer in different countries/regions. How/why they work and don’t work, etc.”
• “cultural, logisAcal, and other differences that must be considered when engaging people from a variety of countries”
• “…transferable new perspecAves on creaAng digital strategies for chariAes in the UK market.”
• Others?
Transform your digital strategy: New ideas from unexpected places
Colin Habberton IFC Masterclass The Netherlands
20/21 October 2015