Iess2013presentation

25
Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management Saturday 2 July 2022 FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION Towards an Ontology and Modeling Approach for Service Science Geert Poels Griet Van Der Vurst Elisah Lemey

description

Short paper presented at IESS 1.3 in Porto, 7-8 February 2013

Transcript of Iess2013presentation

Page 1: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 9 April 2023

FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Towards an Ontology and Modeling Approach for Service

Science

Geert PoelsGriet Van Der Vurst

Elisah Lemey

Page 2: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 2

Motivation (1/2)

Service Science The ‘service system’ is the main abstraction of the service

economy studied in SSMED• Focal concept = value co-creation

Interdisciplinary field searching for shared conceptualization• Theoretical framework = service-dominant logic + systems theories• Call for shared vocabularies and models (+ modeling means)

(= scientific contribution intended by our research)• How can models help SSMED?

(= practical relevance of our research)– Power of visualization– Power of analysis

Page 3: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 3

Motivation (2/2)

Systems modeling is research topic in IS Large class of service systems are enterprises. Enterprises

are systems. Capitalize on enterprise modeling knowledge in IS

• Business models – Conceptual Modeling, Requirements Engineering– E.g., business model canvas, goal models, value models, capability

models• Enterprise (architectural) models – Enterprise

Architecture/Engineering, Business Process/Workflow Modeling, Data/Database Modeling, Software Engineering/Model-driven Engineering, …

Page 4: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 4

Purpose (1/4)

Starting point: Service System Worldview (Spohrer)

• Entity• Resource• Access Right• Ecology• Interaction

• Value proposition based interaction• Governance mechanism based interaction• Outcome• Measure • Stakeholder

Informed by SDL and systems theories

Page 5: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 5

Purpose (2/4)

Problem statement How to go from an initial vocabulary to talk about service

systems to a useful modeling instrument for describing and designing service systems?

• theoretical basis unclear (definitions?, internal consistency?, sharedness?, ..)

• merely a list of concepts – what about relationships and rules/axioms that hold for these relationships? (domain structure?)

Page 6: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 6

Purpose (3/4)

Research objectives Clarify theoretical basis of concepts Represent concepts in a conceptual model that also

identifies the domain structure Transform conceptual model, which is basically a graphical

model, into a domain ontology for service systems (with formal, precise semantics and ability to use ontological tools)

Define a meta-model of a service system modeling language based on the ontology

Current research

Page 7: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 7

Purpose (4/4)

Select/develop a concrete syntax (notation) for the meta-model

Develop a method (and possibly tool support) for applying the modeling language to real service system modeling situations

Explore applications for service system design, engineering, and management

Page 8: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 8

Method

Research activities/steps Literature review of conceptual frameworks and theories

in service-related disciplines (and beyond) Conceptual design Conceptual modeling Ontology engineering Meta-modeling and language development Method engineering Tool development Application and evaluation

Current research

Page 9: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 9

Service Systems

Worldview

Service Dominant

Logic

Service Quality

Gap Model

Unified Service Theory

Service Ontology based on

DOLCEWork

System Method

System Theoretic

Model

Theoretical analysis

DEFINITION OF

CONCEPTS?

RELEVANCE OF

CONCEPTS?

COMPLETENESS OF CONCEPTS?

Page 10: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 10

Results (1/4)

Clarification of theoretical grounding of service system worldview w.r.t. relevancy

• Three common foundational concepts: – service system entity– interaction– stakeholder perspectives provider and consumer

• Other foundational concepts all supported by at least one theory

• No foundational concepts rejected by any of the theories

Page 11: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 11

Results (2/4)

w.r.t. completeness• Service system worldview allows different interpretations to

co-exist– Service as co-production versus service as co-creation

=> implications for the nature of involvement of customer resources, the definition of focal resource and access rights

– Service within the service system or between service systems=> implications for the definition of entity and ecology

– Service as a process, as an outcome (or even the only outcome), as a commitment=> indicates the need to explicitly define service

– Mutuality within the service or in the economic exchange of services=> indicates the need for a service exchange model

Page 12: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 12

Results (3/4)

w.r.t. definitions• As Service Science studies value co-creation phenomena, our

conceptual design introduced service as an eleventh foundational concept

– Service is the favourable, intended outcome of interactions between service system entities. This favourable, intended outcome is mutual value co-creation.

– Mutual value co-creation results from a (successful) service process, in which at least two service system entities (in the roles of consumer and provider) participate.

Geert Poels
A problem with Elisah's work is the confusion between service as an outcome and service as a process. The service process concept is not present in the model.(however, it is the dynamic view built over the core concepts)
Page 13: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 13

Results (4/4)

Conceptual model Theoretical analysis/conceptual design identified

• Relationships between foundational concepts– E.g., focal resource is a physical or non-physical resource with rights

(i.e., operant resource in SDL)• Axioms/rules that apply to these relationships

– E.g., at least two service system entities participate in a service (i.e., resources of both consumer and provider are involved).

Graphical representation using UML (class diagram)• Shows the structure of the service system domain

Page 14: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 14

Service system conceptual model

Page 15: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 15

Discussion

Contribution so far Graphical conceptual model of service system worldview

• Clarification of foundational concepts• Identification of domain structure

Implications Helps development of formal service system ontology and

service system modelling language Helps understanding service system worldview by adding

structure to the set of foundational concepts Limitation

Remaining definitional issues need to be clarified Evaluation

Page 16: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 9 April 2023

FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Auxiliary slides(from IESS 1.2 paper)

Page 17: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 17

Service Design Theory

Page 18: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 18

Results (6/6)

Relationship ISPARand service system worldview

service

serviceprocess

Geert Poels
Are all functions in the EPC interactions, or are some just activities by one entity?(interaction requires participation of at least two entities, each contributing resources)
Geert Poels
No exact match between core concepts cluster here and 'core' concepts supported by all theories reviewed: entity (OK), interaction (OK), provider/consumer perspectives (NOT OK)no specialisations of interactionno outcomeHow to defend?- there are other stakeholder perspectives- we added service as 'core', and is a specialisation of outcome, so outcome is also added- value proposition and governance mechanism based interactions are specialisations of core concept of interaction=> include specialisations of core concept=> include generalisation of core concepts=> exclude core concepts if they are specialisations of a non-core concept and have non-core siblings
Page 19: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 19

Future research

Compare with other process models, e.g., DEMO basic transaction pattern, Open-edi Business Transaction phase specification, ..

Evaluate w.r.t. problems addressed by research objectives 1 – 2 Clarity, faithfulness, completeness, ..

Research objectives 3 – 7 Ontology Modeling framework

Page 20: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 20

EPC representation of service process

Geert Poels
The initial state (initiating event) is close to the service commitment concept of Ferrario and Guarino. It can be either or both of- consumer is aware of service need- provider is willing to create awareness of service offer
Geert Poels
Provider: create awareness of service offer and/or respond to service needConsumer: become aware of service offer (and need)
Geert Poels
Consumer is aware of service need and service offer1-to-1 linkage between service provider and consumer is established
Page 21: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 21

Page 22: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 22

Page 23: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 23

Demonstration: business lunch

Page 24: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 24

Demonstration: money investment

Page 25: Iess2013presentation

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Department of Management Information and Operations Management 25

Demonstration: on-line newspaper