IAGA 2010, China Changchun
-
Upload
anjolie-bradford -
Category
Documents
-
view
61 -
download
5
description
Transcript of IAGA 2010, China Changchun
IAGA 2010, China Changchun
Geomagnetic field measurement and data analysis of the
Cheongyang observatory in Korea
Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS)
Po Gyu Park, Wan-Seop Kim
Sung-Dae Hong, Myeong-Son Yu, Se-Jong Lee
Korea Meteorological Administration
Juwan Kim
Chonbuk National University
Better Standards, Better Life
I. Location and purposes
-Geomagnetic Observatory in Cheongyang(CYN) :
operating by KMA
(CYN, 126º 51′ 28″, 36º 21′ 56″, 150 m )- To measure geomagnetic field precisely- To study the possibility of forecasting of
earthquake activity. - To join INTERMAGNET- CYN consisted of 4 huts is located
in a mountainous area
Better Standards, Better Life
II. Instruments and noise measurements
• INTERMAGNET recommendations • 3-axis fluxgate magnetometer(DMI), proton magnetometer (GEM), D/I magnetometer (MinGeo)• Nonmagnetic material used for huts, measurement of magnetic properties for rocks and soil• AC magnetic field noise ( ~1 nT in 60 Hz)• DC magnetic stray field of car effect are measured (Excel car, 0.05 nT in 70 m).• Comparison between Cs-He and proton magnetometer• Absolute measurements (10 months, D=-8º, I=58º)
Better Standards, Better Life
Rock Magn. Properties
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3-0.015
-0.010
-0.005
0.000
0.005
0.010
0.015
M
agn
etiz
atio
n (
emu
)
Applied field (T)
300 K
Paramagnetic !
Better Standards, Better Life
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
-0.010
-0.005
0.000
0.005
0.010
Mag
net
izat
ion
(em
u)
Applied field (T)
Soil Magn. Properties
Soft ferromagnetic !
Better Standards, Better Life
Magnetic effect (car)
•Axcell : 0.05 nT ( 70 m )•Tico : 0.05 nT ( 50 m )* Iron(1 T) : 1 nT (100 m )
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 680
0
5
10
15
gradiometer
Mc
L 7 m
Cs-
Earth mag. field
Meas. effective car magn. moment - McTico - 173 A.m2
Excel - 520 A.m2
0.0005 nT0.05 nT
: Car "Excel": Car "Tico"
Car
Ma
gne
tic F
ield
( n
T )
Distance,L ( m )
Better Standards, Better Life
Comparison (Proton and Cs-He)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
46448
46450
46452
46454
46456
46458
Kakioka(Overhauser)
Kakioka(Proton)
KRISS(Cs-He AMR)
Kakioka(2010. 4. 22. 1s)
EM
F (
nT)
Time (h)
Better Standards, Better Life
III. D/I measurement
-Trained by KIGAM(Dr. Lim) and KAKIOKA(Mr. Minamoto)
Better Standards, Better Life
IV. Difference of vector and scalar data
Scalar : Dead zone Vector : orthogonal (3-axis)
Better Standards, Better Life
0 5 10 15 20 25
50120
50130
50140
50150
50160
50170
50180
Diff
(nT
, Flu
x-P
roto
n)
Proton
3-Axis Flux
EM
F (
nT)
Measurement Time (h, 1 sec, May909)
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
Diff avg : 26.32 nT
Difference of vector and scalar data(1)
Better Standards, Better Life
0 5 10 15 20 25
50120
50130
50140
50150
50160
50170
50180
50190
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Diff avg : 31.63 nT
Diff
(nT
, Flu
x-P
roto
n)
Proton Mag
3-axis Fluxgate
EM
F (
nT)
Measurement Time ( h) (2009. 7. 9. 1sec data)
Difference of vector and scalar data(2)
Better Standards, Better Life
V. Uncertainty (Error?)
Parameter associated with the result of a measurement,
that characterizes the dispersion of the values that
could reasonably be attributed to the measurand
(VIM2 :International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology)
-ISO Guide, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurements(GUM), ISO, 1995.-Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results, NIST Technical Note 1297, NIST, 1993.-Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurements, EURACHEM, 1995. -DIN 1319-4, Gundlagen der Messtechnik
Better Standards, Better Life
•Modeling the measurement
•Identifying uncertainty components•for each input quantity
• Evaluating standard uncertainty •Type A, Type B
• Combining standard uncertainties•of input quantities
• Expanded uncertainty
•Coverage factor
•Sensitivity coefficient
5 steps in Meas. Uncer. evaluation
n
su
nsu
sor
),...,,( 21 nxxxfy
ixu
ii x
fc
i
N
i i
xux
fyu 2
2
1
2c )(
2k
)(c yukU
),...(),(),(
3,
2,
1,
i
i
i
xuxuxu
Better Standards, Better Life
standard uncertainty
Pro. dis ci ui ciui d.o.f.
u(x)
u(xrep)
u(xres)
0.0294
0.0293
0.0029
rectangular
t
rectangular
1
1
1
0.0294 0.0294 ∞ 6
∞
u(c) 0.025 normal 1 0.025 0.025 ∞
uc(m) 0.039 normal ∞
Uncertainty budgets table(ex.)
Extended Uncertainty : coverage factor(k) x Uc * ( Confidence level 95%, k=2 )
ex) Total intensity : (49598.2 ± 0.1) nT ((Reading-0.5)±0.1) nT
Better Standards, Better Life
VI. Future work(CYN)
- D/I measurement continually
- Comparison (Proton and Cs-He Magn.)
- Evaluation of uncertainties(MFD, D/I?)
- Join in INTERMAGNET in 2011
- Time sync. for 1 s data
- Contribution to Geomagnetic society
Better Standards, Better Life
1. V. Ya. Shifrin, Po Gyu Park et al., “Experimental estimation of the accuracy of medern scalar quantum magnetometer…”, Phys. Ear. Plan. Inter. 166(2), pp.147-152(2008).
2. P. G. park, Y. G. Kim, V. Ya. Shifrin, "Maintenance of Magnetic Flux Density Standards on the Basis of Proton Gyromagnetic Ratio at KRISS" IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 54(2), pp.734-737(2005).
3. V. Ya. Shifrin, V.N.Khorev, A.Ye.Shilov and P.G.Park, “The long-term stability of an atomic magnetic resonance standard system…’, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 52(2), pp.433-435(2003).
4. P. G. Park, Y. G. Kim, V. Ya. Shifrin, and V. N. Khorev, "Precise standard system for low dc magnetic field reproduction", Rev. Sci. Instrum., 73(8), pp.3107-3111(2002).
5. V. Ya. Shifrin, E. B. Alexandrov, T. I. Chikvadze, V. N. Khorev, Po Gyu Park, “Magnetic flux density standard for geomagnetometer”, Metrologia, 37(3), pp.219-227 (2000).
6. V. Ya. Shifrin, Po Gyu Park, V. N. Khorev, Chang Ho Choi, C. S. Kim, “A New Low-Field Determination of the Proton Gyromagnetic Ratio in Water”, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 47(3), pp.638-643(1998).
7. V. Ya. Shifrin, Po Gyu Park, Cheol Gi Kim, V.N. Khorev, Chang Ho Choi, “Experimental Determination of the Gyromagnetic Ratio of the He-4 Atom in Terms of that of the He-3 Nucleus”, IEEE. Trans. Meas. Instrum IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 46(2), pp. 97-100 (1997).
References