iGCDP LC Inferences Parameters:- •LC Growth In exchanges absolute and relative growth. •Contribution to nationalized projects. •Programme sustainability “Finance”.•Learning events for external visibility and collaboration.

AIESEC AHMEDABAD • Growth of 300% in Experience delivery but need to carry forward in

coming years. • Highly focused on Nationalized Projects, it contributes to 50% exchanges

out of total realization in iGCDP. • Financially sustainability at operational level. • Frequently need to do more learning events and workshop for more

external visibility as youth run organization focusing towards Social Impact.

AIESEC BANGALORE • Growth of 90% in Experience delivery but need to carry forward in coming years.• For sustainability need to contribute more towards Nationalized Projects. Out of

total exchanges in lc’s 29x contribute to national projects. • Runing iGCDP operation at loss and there is no financial sustainability in

programme. • Need to collaborate with more learning partners for external visibility and high

quality of exchange delivery.

AIESEC BARODA • Growth of 31% in Experience delivery. But how much its externally visible• Highest contribution to Nationalized projects. But there is no document

submission at national office. • Most cost centric portfolio for lc. Docs was not submitted with audits. • Incomplete audits • Conducted external impact based events and collaborated with different org.

AIESEC CHANDIGARH • Took a downfall in exchanges but has more process oriented approach in delivery

and reception. • Contributed 124x to nationalized project out of total x. • Need to financially sustain the exchange its most cost centric portfolio. • Frequently involved in more workshops and events. Need to collaborate with

more org for increase in experience delivery.

AIESEC CHENNAI • Has shown relative growth compared to last year but need to capitalized on more

issues for increase in experience delivery. • Financially sustained at operational delivery. • Less contribution to nationalized projects. • Need to conduct more learning events and workshop for external visibility.

AIESEC DELHI UNIVERSITY • Growth of 173% in Experience delivery but need to carry forward in coming year. • One of the lc which is financially sustained in iGCDP portfolio and making profit out

of it. • Highly focused on nationalized project and contributing 160x out of total x at lc

level iGCDP. • Most externally visible through its events and learning events for trainees.

AIESEC DELHI IIT • Increased in Experience delivery and have capacity to grow through its

sustainable model in iGCDP. • Contributing 110x to Nationalized projects out of total x in iGCDP.• Need to sell more projects and events to generate income for financially

sustainable. • Collaborate with more organization which can drive growth for increase in

experience delivery and quality improvement.

AIESEC JAIPUR • Relative growth is less in over all portfolio. • Less contribution to nationalized project out of total exchange. • Need to revamp financial model for igcdp due to most cost centric portfolio. • For external visibility need to conduct more learning events and collaborate to

external organization for increase in quality delivery.

AIESEC HYDERABAD • Growth of 24% in Experience delivery but it should be continuous process.

• Contributing 137x to nationalized project out of total x. • Financially not sustained due to lack of planning and poor delivery. • Need to organize more learning events, workshops and impact events for external

visibility.

AIESEC IIT KGP • Showed massive growth in experience delivery but can do more.• All the exchange delivered are nationalized projects. • Need to financially sustain at operational level. • Conduct more workshop and collaborate with issues related Ngo’s.

AIESEC INDORE • Growth of 334% in Experience delivery but it should be continuous process.• No contribution towards nationalized projects. • One of the most profit generated portfolio and financially sustained. • Successfully conducting external events and contributed to Discover India.

AIESEC JALANDHAR • Growth of 130% in Experience delivery but need to focus on quality and delivery.• Contributing 74x out of total x to nationalized projects. • More cost centric portfolio. • Lack of external visibility and no external collaboration.

AIESEC KOLKATA • Massive growth in experience delivery compared to last year. • 80% contribution to nationalized project out of total x. • Financially sustained due to nationalized project as well selling project and

conducting events. • Delivered maximum learning events and workshop.

AIESEC LUCKNOW • Negative growth compare to last year. • Low contribution towards nationalized projects. • Most cost centric portfolio and no financial model for this portfolio. • Need to conduct more events and collaborate with external organization.

AIESEC MANIPAL UNIVERSITY • Growth of 47% in Experience delivery but it should be continuous process. • Nationalized project contribute only 30% to total exchange. • Financially not sustain at operational level. • Conduct more learning events and work shop for visibility.

AIESEC MUMBAI • Growth of 70% in Experience delivery but it should be continuous process. • Lack of contribution to nationalized projects. • Financially unstable in programme. • Need to conduct learning events for trainees and focus on quality.

AIESE NAVI MUMBAI • Define process for x and delivery. • Focus on nationalized projects.

AIESEC PUNE • Growth of 240% in Experience delivery but it should be continuous process. • Contributing 65% to nationalized project out of total x. • Financially not stable and need to revamp the finance model. • Lack of external visibility and need to collaborate with external org for quality

delivery.

AIESEC SURAT

• Massive growth in exchange. • Contributing 58% to nationalized projects. • Working on financially sustainable model. • Need to conduct more external events and

collaborate with other org for visibility.