Hybrid Wireless Communications with High Reliability and
Transcript of Hybrid Wireless Communications with High Reliability and
1
Ali Abedi, Ph.D, Assistant ProfessorMauricio P. da Cunha, Ph.D, Associate Professor
Electrical and Computer Engineering DeptUniversity of Maine, Orono
2007 NASA Fly-by-Wireless Workshop, Grapevine, TX, March 27-28
Hybrid Wireless Communications with Hybrid Wireless Communications with High Reliability and Limited Power High Reliability and Limited Power Constraints in Noisy EnvironmentsConstraints in Noisy Environments
2
Problem Visualization
SS
S
S
S
S
Mesh Network:
Noise/InterferenceLimited Spectrum
FusionCenter
Power limitedWireless sensor
Reliable Data ?
VariousSensortypes
3
Outline
Reliability Based CommunicationError Correction in Wireless SensorsSensor Capabilities at UMaine Hybrid Architecture
Research TeamCurrent Opportunities
4
Outline
Reliability Based Communication
5
Reliability Based Communication
Reliable communication is NOT possible w/oError Correction Codes [Shannon, 1948]
Problem: How to Design Codes?– Power efficient (Shannon Limit)– Spectrum efficient (Source Entropy)– Reliable (Achieve Desired BER)
Performance Evaluation of high reliability codes takes a long time
BER: Bit Error Rate
6
Likelihood MethodReceived vector
Transmitted BitReliability value
Probability density of LLR Parameter estimation
``A New Method for Performance Evaluation of Bit Decoding Algorithms Using Statistics of the Log Likelihood Ratio,'' 4th International Symposium on Turbo-codes, April 2006, Munich, Germany
7
Turbo Principle
8
Accuracy AnalysisVariance and sample reduction gain
Gain=43 @ BER=10-6
Probability (∆Pe < ε )– 106 samples
• proposed method=0.97• MC method=0.95
– 104 samples• proposed method=0.93• MC method=0.33
MC: Monte-Carlo Simulation is used to generate enough samples and count number of errors.
SampleReduction
9
Summary of Contributions
Analytical performance evaluation:– Accurate (compared to bounds)
– Fast– Low cost
Enabling technology– Code optimization (min BER)
– Power minimizationNear theoretical limit operation
10
Outline
Reliability Based CommunicationError Correction in Wireless Sensors
11
Wireless Standards
12
Implementation
13
Proposed Approach
3.5 dB gain
1000 timesMore reliable
Invited paper: ``A Simple Error Correction Scheme for Performance Improvement of IEEE 802.15.4,''IEEE International Conference on Wireless Networks, June 2007, Las Vegas, NV
14
Outline
Reliability Based CommunicationError Correction in Wireless SensorsSensor Capabilities at UMaine
15
Sensor Capabilities at UMaineLASST/UMaine: Laboratory for Surface Science
and TechnologyR&D Areas of Expertise– Physical, Chemical and Biological Sensors– High Temperature Materials– Micro/Nano Systems and Devices
Interdisciplinary Research Center – Faculty, students, staff, and industrial collaborators– Physics, Chemistry, Microbiology, Electrical Eng., Chemical
Eng., Bio Eng, Food Science, Computer Science– Collaborative high-tech projects with industries and national
partners & business incubator – Clean room, state-of-the-art microlithography, micro and nano
fab., thin film synthesis and characterization, sensor testing and evaluation, wireless syst. and dev.
– Strong commitment to education NSF IGERT, GK-12, RET, REU
16
Materials/Thin Film Preparation & CharacterizationMaterials/Thin Film Preparation & Characterization
Sensor Fab: metallization, photolithography, micromachining, patterning/etching, dicing/bonding/packaging Sensor Testing: gas chromatograph/
mass spec, microwave test facilities/equipHall effect, impedance spectrosc., gas delivery
Crystals aligning, X-Ray anal, auger, XPSCutting, polishing, n& dev. fabr. & test New Crystals
Cutting, grinding and polishingX-Ray & Crystal Analysis Device design, fabrication, and Test
17
Types of Sensor
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
Time [min]
∠S
21
• Biosensors (& micro fluidics)Gas SensorsHarsh Environment (↑ 1000 °C)Physical Sensors (acceleration, stress, strain, vibr., pressure, temp.)Protective film layers for harsh environmentPackaging
18
Wireless Passive Acoustic Wave Physical / Gas Sensors
Work beyond device →reliable communication →code identification, test & selection MultipathDevice design and optimizationHarsh environment packaging
SAW Passive Sensor
19
Device Device fabfab. at UMaine for MSGC/NASA. at UMaine for MSGC/NASA
Safety: Fuel leak detection, Fire detection, Hostile Environment DetectionEnvironment: fuel efficiency in rocket propulsion & jet engines (NASA & commercial aviation)Detection of H2 and CxHY, NOx gases from temperatures ranging from 250 to 550 °C
162 164 166 168 170 172 174-55
-50
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
Freq [MHz]
S21
Res
pons
e (d
B)
750 °C 25 °C500 °C
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
Time [min]
FRE
QU
EN
CY
VA
RIA
TIO
N [
Δ K
Hz]
1 2 3 4
5 6
7 8
H2 off / N2 on
N2 off / H2 on
20
Outline
Reliability Based CommunicationError Correction in Wireless SensorsSensor Capabilities at UMaineHybrid Architecture
21
Tails are important
22
Integrated Design
Sensor Channel
Sensor ChannelChannel Encoder
Conventional design
Integrated design
23
Lower tier
Upper tier
nodes
Super nodes
sources
NS )ˆ( NSg)ˆ( NSf
NS1S
Gateway
Wireless/Optical
Wireless
Microwave
Hybrid Architecture
24
Turbo Principle
RecursiveConvolutional
Encoder
RecursiveConvolutional
Encoder
π
NS
)ˆ( NSg
)ˆ( NSf
NS
25
Outline
Research TeamCurrent Opportunities
26
Research Team
University of Maine, Orono, ME– PI: Prof. Ali Abedi
Director, WiSe-Net Lab– Co-PI: Prof. Mauricio P. da Cunha
Director, Microwave Lab
NASA Johnson Space Center– Dr. Patrick Fink
Deputy Chief, Electromagnetic Systems Branch
MainelyWired, Swanville, ME– Tristan Petersen, Chief Engineer
27
Future opportunities
Collaboration– Mechanical/Civil Engineers at UMaine– NASA centers– Industrial partners
[email protected]@eece.maine.edu