The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

29
The Hybrid Mobile Wirel ess Sensor Networks for Data Gathering Biao Ren, Jian Ma, Canfeng Chen Proceeding of the 2006 international conference on Communications an d mobile computing IWCMC '06 July 2006

description

 

Transcript of The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Page 1: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks for Data Gathering

Biao Ren, Jian Ma, Canfeng Chen Proceeding of the 2006 international conference on Communications and mobile computing IWCMC '06 July 2006

Page 2: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Outline Introduction Models and Related works Analyses Simulations Conclusions

Page 3: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Introduction Traditional wireless sensor networks extension based on

pure ad-hoc networks ,where the dense distribution of sensor nodes and multi-hop transmission over the whole network are their outstanding characteristics.

Some disadvantages still exist, such as poor scalability, weak energy balance, as well as low network lifetime.

Hybrid wireless sensor network is usually comprised of some kinds of heterogeneous devices, which mainly act as sinks responsible for gathering and forwarding data from sensor nodes.

Page 4: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Introduction(cont.) Some of them are energy-rich or rechargeable, some are

capable of communication with better capability and some are mobility enabled. These features can not only improve the network performance, but also extend the potential applications and make commercial implementation easy.

The paper investigates the impacts of the number, velocity, transmission radius and gathering mode of mobile sinks on large-scale and sparse wireless sensor networks.

Page 5: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Models and Related works Network Model

Mobility Model

Traffic Model

Page 6: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Network Model

The hybrid mobile sensor network consists of numerous static sensor nodes and some number of mobile sinks. The location of the static nodes are fixed and distributed uniformly at random.

The mobile sinks are randomly distributed at initial time. At later time their position and velocities are given by the mobility model.

In order to comparison, we also consider the fixed sinks where the velocity of mobile sinks is set to zero. Each fixed sink is arranged at a grid point to optimize the performance.

Page 7: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Mobility Model

Each of the total m mobile sinks pick a direction uniformly at random from (0, 2π ] and moves in that direction for a distance d at speed v , where d is a exponentially distribution.

If the sink hits the boundary of the sink, it is reflected at the boundary (The positions of mobile nodes are independent of each other). The direction of the mobile node is also uniformly distributed in (0, 2π ] all the time.

Page 8: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Traffic Model In dense sensor network, data gathered from

environment is forwarded to sink node in multi-hops fashion. Although it can provide low data delivery delay, the energy consumption per bit is much higher due to the multi-hop forwarding of one packet.

We adopt the limited k-hop scheme for data gathering from sensor nodes. That is, the data transmission of a sensor node will not happen until at least one mobile sink approach to it within at most k-hop distance.

Page 9: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks
Page 10: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Analyses

Delay Analysis

Velocity Impact on Delay

Page 11: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Delay Analysis(/)

The end to end data delivery delay is dominated by the duration during the sensor nodes are waiting for a sink to approach. So waiting duration is our primary concern.

It is related to the number and the velocity of mobile sinks as well as the transmission radius of sensor nodes.

Page 12: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Delay Analysis(/)

Theorem Given a sensor node S. Let m denotes the number of mobile sinks, r is the range of transmission and v is the velocity of mobile sinks. With high probability, the average duration D until which a mobile sink first enters the field of sensor node S is

Page 13: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks
Page 14: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Delay Analysis(/) M: some mobile sink at a distance l from the static sens

or node S. The probability that M enters the neighborhood of S is e

qual to the angle subtended by the neighborhood of S at M.

cr : scaling factor angle: Ri :rings with width m-1/2 (consists of points which are at

a distance between i -1/ m-1/2 and i / m-1/2 from S) Let Xi,jbe a random variable such that Xi,j=1 if the i th mo

bile sink is in Rj and it will enter neighborhood of S.

Xi,j= 0, otherwise. (The event Xi,j ≈2cr/m )

The probability that Mi ∈ Rj is ≈ 2j m-1/2

Page 15: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Delay Analysis(/) Define: d :the number of rings far from S.

Use the second Chernoff bound Equation

=> d=4f logm / cr

a sensor node can take time less than

to wait for a mobile sink reaching it with high probability. The service probability that a sensor is within the coverag

e of at least one mobile sink

Page 16: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Velocity Impact on Delay(1/3)

High velocity can increase the probability for the sensor and mobile sink meet with each other, but mobile sinks passing through the effective region of a sensor node so fast that there is no adequate time to perform continuous transmission.

Increasing velocity will increase the service probability whereas decrease the service duration of each time.

Page 17: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Velocity Impact on Delay(2/3) The average travel distance through the region is equal t

o The available time for message transmission is proportio

nal to

L: message length w: channel bandwidth

=>L/w: the number of time slots required to transmit a

message p: service probability service time μ :

Page 18: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Velocity Impact on Delay(3/3)

The average message delivery delay:

λ=1 =>

λ: average arrival rate

Page 19: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Simulations Evaluate three different performance metrics which are c

rucial to improve the QoS and prolong the lifetime of sensor network.

1.The average data delivery delay - duration from data generation to data reception

2.The data success rate - the ratio of the number of message generated by sensor

nodes to it received by mobile sinks

3.The lifetime of the network - minimal remaining energy (1000)

Page 20: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Simulations(cont.)

Totally 1500 sensor nodes are deployed uniformly at random in the determined area.

Varying transmission radius is chosen properly to assure

some degree of connectivity of network.

Mobile sinks move according to mobility model.

The data generation of each sensor nodes follows a Poisson process with an average arrival interval of 1s.

Page 21: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks
Page 22: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks
Page 23: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks
Page 24: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks
Page 25: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks
Page 26: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks
Page 27: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks
Page 28: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks
Page 29: The Hybrid Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Conclusions

Choosing appropriate number, transmission range, velocity as well as gathering fashion of mobile sinks can significantly guarantee lower end-to-end data delivery delay and achieve better energy conservation.

A promising direction for future work is to explore the use of cooperative mobility, find an effective data dissemination protocol, and improve the throughput capacity of hybrid sensor network.