Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

21
Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces

Transcript of Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Page 1: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion

Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces

Page 2: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Background

• Predicting an enemy’s behavior after a nearby explosion could be useful for:– Planning complex operations– Outlining operational requirements by certain

weapon systems – Developing drills for military units

• In many cases the “interesting” question is how long it takes to escape from a room.

Page 3: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Objectives

• Estimating the amount of time required to escape a room after an explosion in another room in the building.

• Improving general understanding of people’s behavior after a nearby explosion.

• Emphasis: “worst-case” scenario (quick escape), military or guerrilla organization personnel.

Page 4: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Illustration

Page 5: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Method

• The research is based on analyzing videos from the internet, in which people are seen reacting to explosions in their vicinity.

• Most videos:– Urban environment– Captured via security cameras

• If several people are seen in the same video, each person is analyzed individually.

• Sample size: 25 cases (from 10 videos)

Page 6: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Demarcation & Assumptions

• Urban area only• Military or guerrilla organization personnel only• Explosion occurs in another room in the

building• Fairly small explosion (for minimizing civilian

casualties)• Person of interest is not ready for the explosion

Page 7: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Demarcation & Assumptions

• We did not take into account cases of selfless or inefficient stalling, since:– The main goal is to estimate the minimal time of

escaping.– Stalling of this sort is difficult to generalize.

Page 8: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Example of a Video

Page 9: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Findings

Page 10: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Preliminary Analysis

Page 11: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Why Can’t we Stop Here?

• Sample size is limited (25 cases)• Military/guerrilla personnel vs. civilians:

– Differences in ages & gender– Combat training

• Therefore, to conclude the minimal “escape time”, a more detailed analysis is necessary

Page 12: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Detailed Analysis: The Phases

Explosion

Page 13: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Detailed Analysis: Gantt Charts

These were the different observed Patterns:

Recovering from primary shock

Running to a nearby exit

Assuming a defensive position

Stalling

Staying in a defensive position

Time

Recovering from primary shock

Recovering from primary shock

A

B

C

Running to a nearby exit

Running to a nearby exit

A

B

C - Stall & Escape (not considered in analysis)

- Defend & Escape

- Duration strongly depends on the intensity of the shock

- Quick Escape

Page 14: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Detailed Analysis: Total Time (Separated by Cases)

• We addressed four cases: – Quick Escape/Defend & Escape; – With/without a significant physical shock

• The results:

Without a significant physical shock

With a significant physical shock

Escape immediately after explosion

Very quickly Quickly

Escape after assuming defensive position

Quickly After a while

Page 15: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Using the Results for Practical Problems

Page 16: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Defining a “Moderate-Severe” Scenario

• In some cases, predicting the most-severe scenario is important.

• A “moderate-severe” scenario is useful for cases in which otherwise the solution is “too expensive”.

• We used 2 methods to estimate a “moderate-severe” escape time:– Manipulating the figures in the Gantt charts, simulating

having slowed down for one of the phases– Using the 10th percentile from the preliminary findings

(categorized by if physical shock was significant or not)

Page 17: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Final Results

• Dividing into different columns allows matching values with their corresponding tactical use.

Without a significant physical shock

With a significant physical shock

“Most-severe” scenario

Very quickly Quickly

“Moderate-severe” scenario

Quickly After a while

Page 18: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Summary and Conclusions

Page 19: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Summary & Conclusions

• Results are valid only for the first person to leave the room

• Reminder: research focused on the severe cases. In some cases people may stay around for much longer.

• The single “most-severe” value should only be used when clearly necessary. The case will actually occur only if all of the following conditions apply:– No significant physical shock.– No defense or stalling.– No slowing down at any point until leaving the room.

Page 20: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Summary & Conclusions

• Estimating values the values for the “moderate-severe” scenario as well as the “most-severe” scenario has proven to be important.

• Analyzing internet videos as high resolution data may be a useful method for other researches as well.

Page 21: Human Behavior Nearby an Explosion Philip Tannor (CPT.) IDF Ground Forces.

Questions?