House Review - Verbist

download House Review - Verbist

of 3

Transcript of House Review - Verbist

  • 7/23/2019 House Review - Verbist

    1/3

    Duelling with the Past: Medieval Authors and the Problem of the Christian Era,

    c. 990!!"#. By Peter Verbist. Studies in the Early Middle Ages 21. Turnhout,

    Belgium: Brepols. 21. pp. ! " #$$. %12. &SB' 2 (# (2)# (.

    Duelling with the Past is an inno*ati*e +or that o--ers a *aluable insight into the

    omple!, tehnial +orld o- computusstudies in the entral Middle Ages. Verbist/s

    aim is to analyse ritially t+o ey elements o- the *arious omputistial proesses

    that eight medie*al authors undertoo +hen attempting to orret the -la+ed 0hristian

    era dating system Anno Domini o- 3ionysius E!iguus c.4)5(44. The -irst relates

    to the hronologial and hronographial omponents -or eah o- these arguments

    suh as the number o- years by +hih the 3ionysian era +as orreted, and the

    omputistial basis -or suh orretions to tae plae. The seond onerns the

    underlying themati impetuses -or onduting and reording suh treatises on this

    theologially sensiti*e sub6et. Through this t+o7-old e!amination Verbist

    suess-ully demonstrates the -orm and e!tent to +hih these treatises hallenged

    popular ontemporary methodologial praties regarding the aeptane and

    transmission o- the date -or the year o- 0hrist/s birth. At the same time he onsiders

    the e--et that these partiular authors had on de*eloping intelletual indi*idualism in

    8estern aademia be-ore the ad*ent o- Sholastiism.

    The struture o-Duelling with the Pastis ommendably omprehensi*e and

    easy to -ollo+. The introdution brie-ly a9uaints the reader +ith the ma6or issues

    onerning the onstrution o- early medie*al dating systems to determine 0hrist/s

    inarnation and passion Verbist outlines the main di--iulties that computus sholars

    enountered +ith auctoritas te!tual authority and *arious argumenta established

    rules o- thumb +hen trying to promulgate alternati*e dating systems to that o-

  • 7/23/2019 House Review - Verbist

    2/3

    3ionysius. ;e also pro*ides a brie- sur*ey o- the attempts to establish a onsistent

    tradition -or both the ulius A-rianus/ Chronographiac.221 and Bede/sDe

    Temporum Ratione c.)2(. Verbist then presents eight hapter ase studies -or the

    respeti*e omputistial +ors o- ;eriger o- =obbes d. 1), Abbo o- ?leury d.

    14, Marianus Sottus d. 1@2,

  • 7/23/2019 House Review - Verbist

    3/3

    The *alue and impliations o- this timely +or are pro-ound. &n pro*iding us

    +ith an up7to7date e!amination o- the urrent orpus o- te!ts dealing +ith

    omputistial orretions -rom this partiular era, Verbist has done something that has

    not been attempted be-ore, despite the signi-iant amount o- attention reently paid to

    entral medie*al apoalyptiism. Moreo*er he has indiretly re*ealed some o- the

    pressing ontemporary theologial onerns that guided medie*al computussholars.

    8e are also gi*en strong indiations that alulations regarding the -uture ages o- the

    +orld +ere not a ma6or onern to these authors. ;is uno*ering o- their 9uest -or

    intelletual autonomy, in the -ae o- a +idespread silent a9uiesene about a

    generally ano+ledged erroneous dating system, beons to be inorporated into our

    present understanding o- medie*al interpretations o- authority as +ell as

    millenarianism.

    University of Eeter