House Review - Verbist
Transcript of House Review - Verbist
-
7/23/2019 House Review - Verbist
1/3
Duelling with the Past: Medieval Authors and the Problem of the Christian Era,
c. 990!!"#. By Peter Verbist. Studies in the Early Middle Ages 21. Turnhout,
Belgium: Brepols. 21. pp. ! " #$$. %12. &SB' 2 (# (2)# (.
Duelling with the Past is an inno*ati*e +or that o--ers a *aluable insight into the
omple!, tehnial +orld o- computusstudies in the entral Middle Ages. Verbist/s
aim is to analyse ritially t+o ey elements o- the *arious omputistial proesses
that eight medie*al authors undertoo +hen attempting to orret the -la+ed 0hristian
era dating system Anno Domini o- 3ionysius E!iguus c.4)5(44. The -irst relates
to the hronologial and hronographial omponents -or eah o- these arguments
suh as the number o- years by +hih the 3ionysian era +as orreted, and the
omputistial basis -or suh orretions to tae plae. The seond onerns the
underlying themati impetuses -or onduting and reording suh treatises on this
theologially sensiti*e sub6et. Through this t+o7-old e!amination Verbist
suess-ully demonstrates the -orm and e!tent to +hih these treatises hallenged
popular ontemporary methodologial praties regarding the aeptane and
transmission o- the date -or the year o- 0hrist/s birth. At the same time he onsiders
the e--et that these partiular authors had on de*eloping intelletual indi*idualism in
8estern aademia be-ore the ad*ent o- Sholastiism.
The struture o-Duelling with the Pastis ommendably omprehensi*e and
easy to -ollo+. The introdution brie-ly a9uaints the reader +ith the ma6or issues
onerning the onstrution o- early medie*al dating systems to determine 0hrist/s
inarnation and passion Verbist outlines the main di--iulties that computus sholars
enountered +ith auctoritas te!tual authority and *arious argumenta established
rules o- thumb +hen trying to promulgate alternati*e dating systems to that o-
-
7/23/2019 House Review - Verbist
2/3
3ionysius. ;e also pro*ides a brie- sur*ey o- the attempts to establish a onsistent
tradition -or both the ulius A-rianus/ Chronographiac.221 and Bede/sDe
Temporum Ratione c.)2(. Verbist then presents eight hapter ase studies -or the
respeti*e omputistial +ors o- ;eriger o- =obbes d. 1), Abbo o- ?leury d.
14, Marianus Sottus d. 1@2,
-
7/23/2019 House Review - Verbist
3/3
The *alue and impliations o- this timely +or are pro-ound. &n pro*iding us
+ith an up7to7date e!amination o- the urrent orpus o- te!ts dealing +ith
omputistial orretions -rom this partiular era, Verbist has done something that has
not been attempted be-ore, despite the signi-iant amount o- attention reently paid to
entral medie*al apoalyptiism. Moreo*er he has indiretly re*ealed some o- the
pressing ontemporary theologial onerns that guided medie*al computussholars.
8e are also gi*en strong indiations that alulations regarding the -uture ages o- the
+orld +ere not a ma6or onern to these authors. ;is uno*ering o- their 9uest -or
intelletual autonomy, in the -ae o- a +idespread silent a9uiesene about a
generally ano+ledged erroneous dating system, beons to be inorporated into our
present understanding o- medie*al interpretations o- authority as +ell as
millenarianism.
University of Eeter