Historical Perspective of EMG

36
Historical Perspective of EMG Tiffany Zachry KIN 747 – Biomechanics Seminar Spring 2004

description

Historical Perspective of EMG. Tiffany Zachry KIN 747 – Biomechanics Seminar Spring 2004. Or… Why Frogs Hate Scientists. Jan Swammerdam (1637-1680). Dutch anatomist and biologist Only one known portrait of him—and it’s a fake. Copied from Rembrandt’s The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Tulp. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Historical Perspective of EMG

Page 1: Historical Perspective of EMG

Historical Perspective of EMG

Tiffany Zachry

KIN 747 – Biomechanics Seminar

Spring 2004

Page 2: Historical Perspective of EMG

Or…Why Frogs Hate Scientists

Page 3: Historical Perspective of EMG

Jan Swammerdam (1637-1680)• Dutch anatomist and biologist• Only one known portrait of him—and

it’s a fake.• Copied from Rembrandt’s The

Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Tulp

Picture Source: http://www.janswammerdam.net/

Page 4: Historical Perspective of EMG

Swammerdam (cont’d)

• Discovered that stroking the innervating nerve of the frog’s m. gastrocnemius generated a contraction (1).

• Also strong evidence that he conducted the first electrical stimulation experiments, 134 years before Luigi Galvani (2).

Page 5: Historical Perspective of EMG

Francesco Redi (1626-1698)

• First to recognize connection between muscles and generation of electricity (1).

• 1666—documented that electric ray fish used a highly-specialized muscle (3).

• Most famous for establishing that maggots do not spontaneously generate from rotting meat.

Picture Source: http://www.liberliber.it/biblioteca/r/redi/

Page 6: Historical Perspective of EMG

Alessandro Volta (1745-1827)

• Developed a device which produced electricity, which could be used to stimulate muscles. (3)

• Invented the first electric battery.

• The modern term “volt” comes from his name.Source: www.dictionary.com

Picture Source: http://www.th.physik.uni-frankfurt.de/~jr/physlist.html

Page 7: Historical Perspective of EMG

Luigi Galvani

• Credited as the father of neurophysiology for his similar work with frogs’ legs—1791

• Showed that “electrical stimulation of muscular tissue produces contraction and force.” (1)

• Because of limited instrumentation, his work was not fully accepted until almost 40 years later.

Picture Source: http://info.uibk.ac.at/c/c7/c704/museum/en/physicists/galvani.html

Picture Source: http://butler.cc.tut.fi/~malmivuo/bem/bembook/01/01.htm

Page 8: Historical Perspective of EMG

WARNING!

The following picture is graphic in nature and may not be suitable for all

audiences. Children, pregnant women, the elderly, and those with weak

sphincters are strongly cautioned.

Page 9: Historical Perspective of EMG

Modern Galvanized Frog

Picture Source: http://www.soilmedia.org/artistprojects/hertz/

Page 10: Historical Perspective of EMG

Carlo Matteucci

• First practical galvanometer developed in early 1800s (3)

• Galvanometer – “An instrument used to detect, measure, and determine the direction of small electric currents by means of mechanical effects produced by a current-carrying coil in a magnetic field.” (Souce:http:/dictionary.reference.com/search?

q=galvanometer)

• In 1838, Matteucci used one to show that bioelectricity is connected with muscular contraction (1)

• 1842 – demonstrated the existence of the action potential accompanying a frog’s muscle

Picture Source: http://perso.club-internet.fr/dspt/spirales.htm

Page 11: Historical Perspective of EMG

Emil Du Bois-Reymond (1818-1896)

• 1848 – first to detect electrical activity in voluntary muscle contractions of man (3)

• Had subjects place fingers in saline solution

• Removed skin to reduce transfer resistance (1)

• Detected signal through electrodes connected to galvanometer when subjects contracted muscles

TAKE THAT!!!

Page 12: Historical Perspective of EMG

Guillaume Duchenne (1806-1875)

• 1850 – applied electric stimulation to intact skeletal muscles (4).

• Interested in medical electricity for therapeutic purposes. (5)

• Systematically mapped out functions of nearly every facial muscle (3)

• Worked often with “the old man” who had little feeling in his face. (6)

Picture Source: http://chem.ch.huji.ac.il/~eugeniik/history/duchenne.html

Page 13: Historical Perspective of EMG

WARNING!

The following picture is graphic in nature and may not be suitable for all

audiences. Children, pregnant women, the elderly, and those with weak

sphincters are strongly cautioned.

Page 14: Historical Perspective of EMG

Picture Source: http://chem.ch.huji.ac.il/~eugeniik/history/duchenne.html

Page 15: Historical Perspective of EMG

Picture Source: http://chem.ch.huji.ac.il/~eugeniik/history/duchenne.html

Page 16: Historical Perspective of EMG

Picture Source: http://chem.ch.huji.ac.il/~eugeniik/history/duchenne.html

Page 17: Historical Perspective of EMG

Picture Source: http://chem.ch.huji.ac.il/~eugeniik/history/duchenne.html

Page 18: Historical Perspective of EMG

Picture Source: http://chem.ch.huji.ac.il/~eugeniik/history/duchenne.html

Page 19: Historical Perspective of EMG

Duchenne also discovered some rather surprising

information.

Page 20: Historical Perspective of EMG

• The muscles around the eyes are only active during a genuine smile.

• An insincere smile involves only the muscles of the mouth. (6)

• So, everyone can tell when you’re faking it.

Page 21: Historical Perspective of EMG

Other Notables

• Knowledge of EMG developed as fast as technology could keep up.

• The term electromyography comes from Etienne Marey, who modified Lippman’s capillary electrometer (1876) as one of his many contributions to kinesiology. (1)

• It was used, much like his sphygmograph, to provide a graphic representation of a beating heart. (1)

Page 22: Historical Perspective of EMG

Other Notables

• Forbes et al. were probably the first to use floating electrodes on a moving body.

• They used them to record EMG signals in elephants. (1)

• Forbes also used a CRT to amplify action potentials. (1)

• Willem Einthoven made a string galvanometer in 1903 and won the Nobel Prize for it. (1)

• It uses a thin conductor wire placed between two magnets.

Page 23: Historical Perspective of EMG

Picture Source: http://www.njit.edu/old/bme/Classes/Mr.Bergen/BME687/BME687%20-%20Electrodes.pdf

Modern Floating Electrode

Page 24: Historical Perspective of EMG

Other Notables

• Adrian and Bronk developed the concentric needle electrode in 1929. (1)

• Used it primarily for researching motor control and muscle schemes. (1)

• Enabled detection in individual and small groups of muscle fibers. (4)

• Hypodermic needle with insulated wire in its barrel (4).

Picture Source: http://www.nihonkohden.com/products/supplies/emg-electrodes.html

Page 25: Historical Perspective of EMG

Herbert Jasper (1906-1999)

• • Constructed the first electromyograph from 1942-44 at McGill University (Montreal Neurological Institute) (1).

• Also created a unipolar needle electrode. (4)

• Used his instruments to perform groundbreaking work with epilepsy and neurology and is a member of the Canadian Medical Hall of Fame(http://www.cdnmedhall.org)

Page 26: Historical Perspective of EMG

John Basmajian• 1962 – Basmajian compiles all of the known

information about EMG. (4)• Also created fine-wire electrodes (7) that

were more comfortable than needles and could be used longer. (8)

• The book Muscles Alive becomes an invaluable tool in the field and is updated through five editions, the last Carlo De Luca.

• Founded International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology, ISEK, in 1965. (9)

• ISEK worked to create standards for EMG usage and reporting.

Picture Source: http://www.vulvodynia.com/about.htm

Page 27: Historical Perspective of EMG

Carlo J. De Luca

• Probably the most influential person in recent EMG history.

• Wrote the oft-cited paper “The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics.” (10)

• Cautioned against failing to understand EMG’s limitations. (10)

Picture Source: http://nmrc.bu.edu/fac_staff/director/

Page 28: Historical Perspective of EMG

“Electromyography is a seductive muse because it provides easy

access to physiological processes that cause the muscle to generate

force, produce movement, and accomplish the countless

functions that allow us to interact with the world around us…To its detriment, electromyography is

too easy to use and consequently too easy to abuse.” (10)

Page 29: Historical Perspective of EMG

Our EMG System• In the Biomechanics Lab we are currently using a

MyoSystem 2000 by Noraxon.• “Our internationally known patent-protected

technology incorporates a signal processing technique that overcomes interference known as artifact in a signal. The result is a scientifically reliable surface assessment of dynamic muscle activity. This patent-protected signal processing technology is contained in all of our surface electromyography (SEMG) instrumentation and is recognized as the standard of excellence worldwide.” (Source: www.noraxon.com)

Page 30: Historical Perspective of EMG

MyoSystem 2000

• Older version of the new 1400A.• Tethered system using bipolar electrodes.• New version offers USB 2.0 compatibility, thinner

lightweight cables, and selectable bandwidths for surface or fine-wire electrode use.

Source: www.noraxon.com

Page 31: Historical Perspective of EMG

Blue Sensor Electrodes• Highly conductive

wet gel• Superior adhesion• Comfortable foam

backing• Unique offset concept• High quality Ag/AgCl

sensor• Oblong shape for

easy placement (juvenile)

Juvenile

Adult

Source: www.ambuUSA.com

Page 32: Historical Perspective of EMG

Other Manufacturers of EMG

• NeuroDyne Medical Corporation• The Prometheus Group• Electronic Engineering Corporation• Motion Lab Systems, Inc. – makes equipment and

software, including a package that is compatible with Vicon Clinical Manager and enables Vicon to display raw EMG data. (http://www.emgsrus.com)

• There are numerous other manufacturers as well.

Page 33: Historical Perspective of EMG

Current Studies Using EMG

• “The effect of internal versus external focus of attention on EMG activity during basketball free-throws”

• “Effects of focus of attention on take-off and landing strategies”

• Both studies are using EMG to help assess the effects of attention focus on muscle activity.

• Also, David Groh’s thesis will compare EMG activity in throwing versus Thera-Band use.

Page 34: Historical Perspective of EMG

Questions?

Page 35: Historical Perspective of EMG

References1. Medved, V. (2001). Measurement of human locomotion. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

2. Clarys, J. P. (1994). Electrology and localized electrization revisited. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 4, 5-14.

3. Cram, J. R., and Durie, M. D. (In press). The history of muscle dysfunction and SEMG. Journal of Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. Retrieved February 28, 2004 from www.semg.org.

4. Basmajian, J. V. (1978). Muscles alive: Their functions revealed by electromyography. 4th ed Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.

5. Licht, S. (1971). History of electrodiagnosis. In S. Licht (ed.), Electrodiagnosis and electromyography. New Haven, CT: Elizabeth Licht, Publisher.

6. Katz, E. Retrieved March 9, 2004 from http://chem.ch.huji.ac.il/~eugeniik/history/duchenne.html.

7. Basmajian, J. V., and Stecko, G. (1962). A new bipolar electrode for electromyography: Journal of Applied Physiology. 17, 849.

8. Whittle, M. W. (1999). Gait analysis: An introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

9. The history of ISEK. Retrieved March 9, 2004 from http://isek.bu.edu.

10. De Luca, C. J. (1997). The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 13, 135-163.

Page 36: Historical Perspective of EMG

Other ResourcesAminoff, M. J. (1978). Electromyography in clinical practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

Dainty, D. A., and Norman, R. W. (eds.) (1987). Standardizing biomechanical testing in sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers.

Enoka, R. M. (1988). Neuromechanical basis of kinesiology. (2nd ed.) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Kleissen, R. F. M., Buurke, J. H., Harlaar, J., and Zilvold, G. (1998). Electromyography in the biomechanical analysis of human movement and its clinical application. Gait and Posture, 8, 143-158.

Latash, M. L. (1993). Control of human movement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Latash, M. L., and Zatsiorsky, V. M. (eds.) (2001). Classics in movement science. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Loeb, G. E., and Gans, C. (1986). Electromyography for Experimentalists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.