Highlights - National Food Security Missionnfsm.gov.in/Pulses/Doorstep/PR2010-11-1.pdf · growing...

Highlights

• ICPH 2671 was released as ‘RV ICPH 2671’ by Rajamata Vijaya Raje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya (RVRSKVV), Gwalior, and Madhya Pradesh in December, 2010. This is the outcome of non-NFSM partner but source of inspiration is from NFSM on-farm results.

• An encouraging breeding programs developed by each participating Center.

• The on-farm testing results of ICPH 2740 were encouraging. The hybrid was 35-40% superior over best variety at Akola, Parbhani in Maharashtra and Medak in Andhra Pradesh.

• The recently developed transplanting technology showing good results with hybrids. A farmer from Latur demonstrated this technology in ICPH 2671 and harvested about one kg seed/plant yield. This needs further verification on large-scale.

• In BAU, Ranchi, Jharkhand (a non-NFSM center), the hybrid ICPH 2671 performed very well in 288 on-farm trials and produced 69% advantage over local check.

• The popularity of pigeonpea hybrids increasing the area year by year and spreading to new locations thanks to NFSM project.

i

Contents

1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 1

2 Maintenance and Evaluation of Male-sterile and Fertility Restorer Lines .................................................. 3

3 Development of New A-line.......................................................................................................................... 4

4 Breeding New Fertility Restorers .................................................................................................................. 6

5 Characterization of Hybrid Parents .............................................................................................................. 7

6 Development and Evaluation of New Hybrid Combinations ....................................................................... 7

7 On-Farm Evaluation of Elite Hybrids........................................................................................................... 15

8 Large-scale Seed Multiplication of Hybrids and their Parents ................................................................... 23

9 Effect of Spacing and Irrigation on Yield of Hybrid Seed ........................................................................... 24

10 Grow–out Test (GoT) ................................................................................................................................... 27

11 Training Programs and Field Visits.............................................................................................................. 27

12 Feedback from Farmers .............................................................................................................................. 29

13 Publications ................................................................................................................................................. 30

Annexures

1

1 INTRODUCTION The world’s first commercial hybrid of pigeonpea is now taking root in some important pigeonpea

growing states of India with a high level of acceptance from seed producers and cultivators. The

pigeonpea hybrid technology was developed by the International Crops Research Institute for the

Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) in collaboration with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)

using natural out-crossing and cytoplasmic-nuclear male sterility (CMS) systems. Recently, in 2010, a

promising pigeonpea hybrid ICPH 2671 was released by Rajmata Vijaya Raje Scindia Krishi Vishwa

Vidyalaya, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh as ‘RV ICPH 2671’.This has paved the way for its commercial

production and marketing by different seed companies. The performance of ICPH 2671 and other

high yielding hybrids, such as ICPH 2740 and ICPH 3762 in the on-farm trials in 2009-10 and 2010-11

seasons has generated a lot of interest among the farmers in the states of Maharashtra, Karnataka,

Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Jharkhand. To popularize and enhance the adoption of

hybrids in Indian farming systems, the National Food Security Mission (NFSM) of the Department of

Agriculture & Cooperation (DAC), Ministry of Agriculture, India sanctioned a project “Taking

Pigeonpea Hybrids to the Doorsteps of Farmers” involving five centers. These are: Marathwada

Krishi Vidhyapeeth (MKV), Parbhani; Agricultural Research Station (ARS), Gulbarga; Dr Panjabrao

Deshmukh Krishi Vidhyapeeth (PDKV), Akola; Dantiwada Agricultural University (SDAU), Sardar Krishi

Nagar, Gujarat; and the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT).

The 2010 kharif season was abnormal with respect to the amount and distribution of rainfall. This

adversely affected pigeonpea growth and pod set at all the centers. The extended rains caused

severe flower drop that resulted in extremely poor pod set and delayed maturity.

The abnormal weather conditions prevailed in all the five research centers and adversely affected

the research, on-farm testing and seed production programs. This report summarizes the results of

various project activities undertaken during the 2010-11 cropping season.

http://www.icrisat.org/

http://www.icrisat.org/

2

020406080

100120140160180

Sta

ndar

…22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50

Rainfall data (mm) of PDVK,AKOLA, 2010

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

Janu

ary

Febr

uary

Mar

ch

Apr

il

May

June

July

Aug

ust

Sep

tem

ber

Oct

ober

Nov

embe

r

Dec

embe

r

Rainfall data (mm) of ICRISAT,Patancheru,2010

3

2 MAINTENANCE AND EVALUATION OF MALE-STERILE AND FERTILITY

RESTORER LINES

A total of 67 CMS-lines (A-lines) and 281 restorers were maintained at all the five centers (Table 1) of

the project and the summary is given below:

Akola: This station screened a total of 12 pairs of ‘A’ and ‘B’ lines and 29 ‘R’ lines of pigeonpea for

their reaction to Fusarium wilt and sterility mosaic (SM) diseases in a sick plot at Akola and Nagpur.

The susceptible check TAT-10 was used as control for wilt and Maruti for SM. The resistant parental

lines will be used in the hybrid breeding program. The results are awaited.

Parbhani: Under this activity at Parbhani six A/B pairs (GT 288A, BSMR 736A, BDN 2004-4A, ICPA

2043, ICPA 2048, and ICPA 2092) were evaluated for their stability and resistance to wilt and sterility

mosaic diseases. All the A/B lines were found resistant to wilt but BDN 2004-4A and GT 288 A were

susceptible to sterility mosaic disease. In addition 30 lines selected from MAU used in the crossing

program were also maintained by selfing.

Gulbarga: Apart from these four A-lines (ICPA 2078, ICPA 2043, ICPA 2047 and GT 288A) seven pairs

of A/B lines received from ICRISAT (ICPA 2048-4, ICPA 2092, ICPA 2089 and ICPA 2098) and Gujarat

(GT-625, GT-307 and GT-308) were also evaluated for stability and resistance to wilt and SM

diseases. The conversion program was continued in two (ICPA2101 & ICPA 2061) segregating A-lines.

Rainfall (mm) in Gujarat, 2010

4

The data indicated that the proportion of male-sterility in these lines ranged between 15- 50%.

Based on the male-sterility data 11 promising B-lines were identified for further backcrossing.

Table 1. CMS and restorers lines being maintained at different centers, 2010

Gujarat: A total of 134 F1 progenies involving 75 restorers and four A-lines (CMS GT 288A, CMS GT

301A, CMS GT 311A, and CMS GT 505A) were tested for their fertility restoration with respect to pod

set under insect proof net house. The ability of fertility restoration will be re-assessed by crossing

them with different A-lines in kharif 2011.

ICRISAT: A total of 26 A/B-lines in BC1 – BC7 generations were evaluated in the disease nursery. Of

these, seven lines (ICPA 2078, 2043, 2047, 2048, 2092, 2098 and 2198) were found resistant to both

diseases; while 14 lines were resistant to SM disease only. The remaining five lines were susceptible

to both the diseases. A total of 132 R-lines were evaluated and of these, 73 were resistant to wilt

and SM; two lines to wilt, and 32 lines to SM alone. The remaining 25 R-lines were susceptible to

both the diseases.

3 DEVELOPMENT OF NEW A-LINE The main objective of this activity was to breed new CMS lines with good agronomic base and high

genetic variability. The reports received from various participating centers are summarized below:

Parbhani: To develop new male-sterile lines a total of 205 selections were made within seven

promising cross combinations which exhibited a high level of male-sterility. These will be maintained

through backcrossing and selection.

ARS Gulbarga: Two male-sterile lines ICPA 2101 and ICPA 2061 exhibited low level of male sterility

and the process of developing stable A-lines through selection and backcrossing was started.

Therefore in the last year, 27 plant-to-plant crosses were evaluated along with their respective B

lines (Table 2).

NFSM Center CMS ‘A’ Restorers ‘R’ MKV, Parbhani 6 30 PDKV, Akola 12 29 SK Nagar, Gujarat 4 75 ARS, Gulbarga 19 15 ICRISAT 26 132 Total 67 281

5

Table 2. List of new male-sterile lines being developed at ARS, Gulbarga, 2010-11

Sl.No Backcrosses No. of plants

Total Fertile Sterile %Sterility 1 (ICPA-2101-3 x ICPB-2101-3) x ICPB-2101-3 30 16 14 46.66 2 (ICPA-2101-4 x ICPB-2101-4) x ICPB-2101-4 30 15 15 50.00 3 (ICPA-2101-9 x ICPB-2101-9) x ICPB-2101-9 32 19 13 40.62 4 (ICPA-2101-12 x ICPB-2101-12) x ICPB-2101-12 30 16 14 46.66 5 (ICPA-2161-5 x ICPB-21611-5) x ICPB-2161-5 30 23 7 23.33 6 (ICPA-2161-6 x ICPB-21611-6) x ICPB-2161-6 34 28 6 17.64 7 (ICPA-2161-6 x ICPB-21611-6) x ICPB-2161-7 33 27 6 18.18 8 (ICPA-2161-6 x ICPB-21611-6) x ICPB-2161-9 33 28 5 15.15 9 (ICPA-2161-6 x ICPB-21611-6) x ICPB-2161-10 32 22 10 31.25

ICRISAT: A total of 11 medium-duration lines, maturing in 170-180 days, presently in F1BC2

generations were further backcrossed to stabilize them. Of these, two lines ICPA 2188 and ICPA 2196

exhibited 100% sterility. ICPA 2198 was found to be resistant to wilt and SM diseases and ICPA 2170

and 2195 found to be tolerant to both the diseases (Table 3).

Table 3. Segregation for male-sterility in back crosses populations of medium maturity duration at ICRISAT center

ICPA No. Parentage Generation Total Sterile Fertile

Sterile %

Wilt %

SM %

2188 ICPA 2188 X ICPB 2188 BC2 F1 74 74 0 100 78 26 ICPB 2188(SGBS 6)

2189 ICPA 2189 X ICPB 2189 BC2 F1 61 45 16 74 75 0 ICPB 2189(SIPS 10)

2169 ICPA 2169 X ICPB 2169 BC2 F1 69 27 42 39 81 5 ICPB 2169(ICP 7086)

2170 ICPA 2170 X ICPB 2170 BC2 F1 63 13 50 21 10 0 ICPB 2170(BDN2XBDN2010)

2191 ICPA 2191 X ICPB 2191 F1 53 9 44 17 63 42 ICPB 2191(Kanchan-3)

2193 ICPA 2193 X ICPB 2193 F1 4 3 1 75 - - ICPB 2193(ICPL 20092)

2194 ICPA 2194 X ICPB 2194 F1 14 11 3 76 33 8 ICPB 2194(SIPS-15)

2195 ICPA 2195 X ICPB 2195 F1 14 5 9 36 17 0 ICPB 2195(ICPL 20092)

2196 ICPA 2196 X ICPB 2196 F1 9 9 0 100 40 0

6

ICPB 2196(ICPL 20092)



Gujarat: Fifty one BC2F1 lines were selected from Indo-African crosses in different maturity groups

for further advancement through backcrossing.

4 BREEDING NEW FERTILITY RESTORERS The fertility restoration of stable CMS lines was studied at various centers and the results are

presented here.

Parbhani: The fertility restoration studies were conducted in 157 hybrid combinations. Of these, 140

hybrids were from Parbhani, 14 from Badnapur, and three from ICRISAT. The pollen fertility of the

newly developed hybrids from Parbhani ranged between 40-98%. In the medium-duration hybrids of

Badnapur, the pollen fertility ranged from 30-95%. Among the ICRISAT bred hybrids the pollen

fertility varied between 92-96%.

Gujarat: A total of 134 progenies involving 75 restorers and four different CMS-lines (CMS GT 288A,

CMS GT 301A, CMS GT 311A and CMS GT 505A) were tested for their pollen fertility after crossing

them under an insect-proof net house. The fertility for restoration of these lines was reassessed with

different A-lines for re-confirmation of fertility restoration in kharif 2011. The results have not been

received.

ICRISAT: A total of 163 hybrid combinations were evaluated and 155 hybrids were classified as fertile

with 91-100% pollen fertility. The remaining eight hybrids exhibited 75-90% pollen fertility. This

indicated that the 95% hybrids evaluated had good fertility restoration.

7

5 CHARACTERIZATION OF HYBRID PARENTS

Gujarat: A total of 98 CMS and 81 restorer lines, which were used in developing hybrid combinations

earlier, were characterized for their important agronomic traits (Annexure I, Annexure II). The

molecular characterization of all the lines is in progress.

Gulbarga: Four A/B lines (ICPA 2078, ICPA 2043, ICPA 2047 and GT-288 A) were evaluated for their

important agronomic traits and the results were reported during 2009-10. The characterization of

the remaining seven A/B lines (ICPA 2048-4, ICPA 2092, ICPA 2089, ICPA 2098, GT-625A, GT-307A

and GT-308A) will be done during the next season.

ICRISAT: Twenty-nine promising medium- and long-duration parental lines were evaluated in three

trials at Patancheru during 2010. Of these, 10 B-lines were evaluated in one trial in three

replications. Nineteen R-lines were also evaluated in two trials but due to extremely bad weather all

the trials had to be abandoned. Twelve R-lines were evaluated in one trial with 4 m row plots and

three replications along with Asha and Maruti as controls. In the long-duration group, seven R-lines

were evaluated in a trial along with ICPL 366 as the control variety. In the medium-duration group 12

white seeded R-lines were also evaluated for disease resistance. Of these, ICPR 4433, 4438 and 4400

were found resistant to both the diseases. Hence, these R-lines will be used in breeding disease

resistant medium-duration hybrids. In this year, however, yield data could not be recorded due to

high rainfall. A total of 10 maintainer (B) lines were also evaluated in a trial, of these three lines

belonged to Maruti maturity group while seven lines were of Asha maturity group. In Maruti

maturity group the variation for days to flower ranged from 112-117 and that for maturity from 167

to 178. Of these, ICPB 2198 and 2166 were found to be resistant to both diseases. ICPB 2197, 2189,

2194, 2169, 2193, 2049 and 2188 were resistant to only sterility mosaic disease.

6 DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF NEW HYBRID COMBINATIONS During 2009 and 2010 a total of 989 new hybrid combinations were made (Table 4) by four centers.

Of these, 578 crosses made during 2009 were evaluated during kharif 2010; while 411 new hybrid

combinations made during kharif 2010 will be evaluated for yield and yield contributing traits during

kharif 2011.

8

Table 4. New hybrid combinations made at different centers

Centers Number of hybrids developed

2009 2010 Total MKV, Parbhani 102 140 242 PDKV, Akola NR NR - SK Nagar, Gujarat 123 80 203 ARS, Gulbarga 154 90 244 ICRISAT 199 101 300

Total 578 411 989 NR= not reported

Parbhani: During kharif 2010, 140 new hybrid combinations were made by crossing four CMS-lines

(ICPA 2043, ICPA 2047, ICPA 2078, and ICPA 2092) with 35 male parents. The F1 combinations

developed at Parbhani (20), Akola (07), and ICRISAT (32) were evaluated at MKV Parbhani to identify

high yielding hybrids. The promising hybrids identified in these hybrid trials are listed in Table 5.

Gujarat: Eighty new hybrids were synthesized by crossing seven CMS lines (GT 311A, GT 501, GT 505,

GT 308A, GT 33A, GT 301A, GT 307A) with known restorers for evaluation during kharif 2011. Three

hybrids SKNPCH 0863, SKNPCH 0853, and SKNPCH 0838 were identified after multi-locational testing

at the national level.

Gulbarga: In addition to 154 experimental hybrids developed during the last season, 90 new cross

combinations were made during 2010 using 15 restorer lines, and these will be evaluated during

kharif 2011. A separate multi-location trial organized by the NFSM group involving three hybrids

(ICPH 2671, ICPH 2740 and AKPHM 09-11) was conducted at Gulbarga, Bheemrayangudi, and Bidar.

The main objective of these trials was to identify a high yielding locally adapted hybrid for

promotion. Hybrid ICPH 2671 recorded seed yield of 3798 kg ha-1; while the hybrids ICPH 2740 and

AKPHM 09-11, recorded 3271 kg ha-1 and 3128 kg ha-1 yield, respectively. These hybrids will be

promoted in the selected areas.

9

Table 5. Some promising hybrids identified in different trials at MKV, Parbhani, 2010

Akola: A total of 71 pigeonpea hybrids were evaluated in eight replicated trials during kharif 2010.

These hybrids were evaluated in both multi-location as well as on-station trials of short and medium

duration groups. Of these, 24 short duration hybrids were evaluated in three trials and 47 medium

duration hybrids were tested in five trials at Akola, Rahuri, Badnapur, Parbhani, Delhi, Jabalpur,

Yavatmal and Nagpur. Three promising hybrids (2 from ICRISAT and 1 from Akola) were evaluated at

Akola, Yavatmal, and Nagpur locations in multi-location trials during kharif 2010. Due to excess rains

the trial at Nagpur was vitiated. The yield differences of pigeonpea hybrids at the remaining

locations were significant. The hybrid AKPHM 09-11 produced significantly greater yield of 2165 kg

ha-1 with 19.02% standard heterosis followed by ICPH 2740 (2022 kg ha-1 with 11.16% standard

heterosis) over the best check Asha (1819 kg ha-1).

ICRISAT: In short and medium durations a total of 101 new hybrid combinations were made using

the available CMS lines. Of these, 18 hybrids belonged to short-duration and 83 to medium-

duration. These hybrids will be evaluated in the next rainy season.

Name of the hybrid

Yield (kg ha-1)

Heterosis (%)

ICPA 2043 x ICP 3525 3672 29.70 ICPA 2043 x BSMR 175 3500 23.70 ICPA 2043 x BSMR 203 3400 20.14 BSMR -736 (C) 2830 ICPH 3762 1792 12.11 Asha (C) 1598 AKPHM 11324 2001 96.83 AKPHM10008 1377 35.49 AKPHM11260 1146 12.76 PKV Tara (C) 1016 AKPHM 09-11 1215 25.56 BSMR 736 (C ) ICPH 2751

945 4959

74.32 ICPH 3491 4863 70.94 ICPH 3477 4652 63.53 Asha (C) 2845 ICPH 4187 4243 69.53 ICPH 3496 4014 60.36 ICPH 2671 3841 53.46 Maruti (C) 2503

10

Short-duration hybrids: A trial with nine hybrids and three checks (ICPL 88039, ICPL 88034 and UPAS

120) was conducted at Patancheru and Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore. But

due to excess rains useful data could not be recorded at TNAU. At Patancheru, ICPH 2363 (1636 kg

ha-1, 39% superiority over UPAS 120), ICPH 2364 (1480 kg ha-1, 26% superiority over UPAS 120) and

ICPH 2429 with a yield of 1476 kg ha-1 and 26% superiority over UPAS 120, were found most

promising (Table 6).The other control ICPL 88039 produced 861 kg ha-1 yield but it was too early for

making valid yield comparisons. The third control ICPL 88034, an advanced line, produced 1373 kg

ha-1 (Table 7).The hybrid ICPH 2363 was superior over all three controls.

Three medium-maturing hybrid trials were constituted for multi-location evaluation (MLT) during

the 2010 rainy season. In MLT-1, ICPH 2751 (1997 kg ha-1) was the best and it recorded 45%

superiority over the check. The other promising hybrids were ICPH 3477 (1958 kg ha-1) with 42%

superiority and ICPH 3491 (1811 kg ha-1) with 32% superiority over the control Asha (Table 8).In

MLT-2, ICPH 3763 (1806 kg ha-1) was the best with 24% superiority to control (Table 9). In MLT-3,

ICPH 3496 (1907 kg ha-1) was found to be 36% and 69% superior over Maruti (1407 kg ha-1) and Asha

(1131 kg ha-1), respectively. The other promising hybrids were ICPH 4018, 4187 and 3371; these

hybrids exhibited respectively, 32, 30 and 27% superiority over Asha and all three hybrids were

resistant to both wilt and SM diseases (Table 10).

Table 6. Performance of short-duration pigeonpea hybrids at Patancheru, 2010

Hybrid No. Yield

(kg ha-1) Days to

Plant height (cm)

No. of seeds/

pod 100-seed mass (g)

Plant stand

% Superiority

over

flower maturity ICPL

88039 ICPL

88034 UPAS 120

ICPH 2363 1636 81 125 222 3.8 9.4 48 90 19 39 ICPH 2364 1480 71 111 210 4.2 9.7 54 72 8 26 ICPH 2429 1476 78 115 205 4.0 8.5 44 71 8 26 ICPH 2438 1443 75 120 200 3.9 8.9 50 68 5 23 ICPH 2447 1420 72 114 182 4.0 9.8 54 65 3 21 ICPH 2433 1390 87 125 205 3.8 8.6 54 61 1 18 ICPH 2431 1281 84 125 210 3.8 8.4 54 49 -7 9 ICPH 2441 1248 74 115 210 4.3 8.5 51 45 -9 6 ICPH 3310 1196 66 110 205 4.0 9.7 49 39 -13 2

Controls ICPL 88039 861 58 95 122 3.8 9.7 60 - - - ICPL 88034 1373 72 110 210 3.8 9.5 57 - - - UPAS 120 1175 70 111 195 3.8 7.7 56 - - - SEm± 79.2 0.7 0.6 2.6 0.05 0.28 2.6

11

Mean 1331.7 74 114.6 198.1 3.94 9.06 52.4 CV (%) 8.4 1.4 0.8 1.9 1.71 4.31 7.1

Table 7. Performance of extra short-duration (ICPA 2089) pigeonpea hybrids at Patancheru, 2010.

Hybrid No. Yield

(kg ha-1) Days to

Plant height (cm)

No. of seeds/

pod 100-seed mass (g)

Plant stand

% Superiority

over

flower maturity ICPL

88039 UPAS 120

ICPH 3637 1592 72 110 155 4 7.6 53 71 3 ICPH 3314 1340 70 115 200 4.6 8.1 54 44 -14 ICPH 3630 1249 66 100 182 4.5 9.8 55 34 -19 ICPH 3313 1241 65 102 195 4.1 8.9 52 33 -20 ICPH 3634 995 63 101 150 4.3 8.8 52 7 -36 ICPH 3629 980 58 98 165 4.2 9.1 54 5 -37 ICPH 3311 840 60 100 165 4.5 9.4 48 -10 -46 ICPH 4394 823 60 95 150 4.3 9.2 53 -12 -47 Controls ICPL 88039 933 58 95 145 4.3 9.6 60 - - UPAS 120 1550 70 111 195 4.1 7.8 90 - -

SEm± 128.1 1.0 1.0 15.4 0.08 0.17 2.3 - - Mean 1154.2 64.2 102.7 170.3 4.26 8.85 57.2 - -

CV (%) 15.7 2.2 1.4 12.8 2.5 2.64 5.6 - -

Table 8. Performance (yield kg ha-1) of promising medium-duration pigeonpea hybrids (MLT - 1) in three locations, 2010

Hybrid No. Sehore MAU A R S

% Superiority

over Disease reaction

(%) Parbhani Tandur Mean Asha Wilt SM

ICPH 2751 1605 2472 1913 1997 45 0 0 ICPH 3477 1694 2326 1853 1958 42 0 0 ICPH 3491 1712 2432 1290 1811 32 0 0 ICPH 3762 1641 2171 1618 1810 32 0 0 ICPH 2671 1642 2040 1587 1756 28 0 0 ICPH 2740 1438 1990 1437 1662 21 0 0 ICPH 3497 1472 2085 1317 1625 18 8 0 ICPH 3494 1774 1925 1070 1590 16 0 0 ICPH 3461 1913 1676 980 1523 11 0 0 ICPH 3359 1196 1658 1138 1331 -3 15 0 ICPH 3933 782 1105 810 899 -35 0 0

Control Asha 1415 1422 1288 1375 0 0

12

SEm± 0.203 207.4 175.1 - - - Mean 1524 1941.8 1358.4 - - - CV (%) 19.2 15.1 18.2 - - -

Table 9. Performance of promising medium-duration pigeonpea hybrids (MLT-2) in 2010

Hybrid No. MAU

Parbhani A R S

Tandur

% Superiority

over Disease reaction

(%)

Mean Asha Wilt SM

ICPH 3763 1885 1727 1806 24 0 15 ICPH 4019 685 2372 1529 5 0 0 ICPH 3759 1209 1633 1421 -2 0 0

ICPH 3761 1154 1613 1384 -5 9 0 ICPH 4017 1712 1007 1360 -6 0 0 ICPH 4024 1170 1427 1299 -11 0 0 ICPH 4022 1469 973 1221 -16 8 0

ICPH 4020 1271 1138 1205 -17 0 0 ICPH 3758 1256 1148 1202 -17 0 0 ICPH 4013 1370 785 1078 -26 0 0 ICPH 4012 1198 917 1058 -27 10 0

Control Asha (C) 1883 1020 1452 0 0 SEm± 134.6 373.9 - - - Mean 1355.3 1313.3 - - -

CV (%) 14 40.3 - - -

Table 10. Performance of medium-duration pigeonpea hybrids in MLT-3, 2010

Hybrid No. MAU

Parbhani A R S

Tandur Mean %

Superiority over Disease reaction

(%) Maruti Asha Wilt SM ICPH 3496 2007 1807 1907 36 69 0 0 ICPH 4018 1175 1817 1496 6 32 13 0 ICPH 4187 2122 820 1471 5 30 0 0 ICPH 3371 1027 1853 1440 2 27 0 0 ICPH 4183 1764 1003 1384 -2 22 11 0 ICPH 3481 1662 1065 1364 -3 21 0 0 ICPH 2671 1921 693 1307 -7 16 0 0 ICPH 3381 1609 923 1266 -10 15 50 0 ICPH 4028 1398 880 1139 -19 0 0 0 ICPH 4353 596 792 694 -51 -39 50 0 Control Maruti 1252 1562 1407 - - 10 100

13

Asha 1524 737 1131 - - 0 0 SEm± 122.7 262.6 - - - - - Mean 1504.8 1162.6 - - - - -

CV (%) 11.5 31.9 - - - - -

Evaluation of new medium-duration hybrids in station trials: During 2010 season, a total of 110

experimental hybrids were evaluated in 10 replicated trials in Vertisols at Patancheru. Among these,

in two trials 21 white-seeded hybrids were tested. In all these trials, initial growth and yields were

adversely affected due to water-logging for extended periods resulting in low yields. The same trend

was observed in the controls. However, based on the limited data 17 hybrids were identified which

out-yielded the controls even under very unfavorable growing conditions. Similarly, based on

disease reaction 22 hybrids from eight trials were identified for further testing (Table 11).

To meet the specific requirement of breeding white-seeded pigeonpea hybrids for Gujarat state, 21 hybrid

combinations were tested in two trials. At Patancheru, the initial growth and vigor of these hybrids were good,

but useful data could not be recorded due poor pod set.

Table 11. Promising medium-duration pigeonpea hybrids identified in station trials conducted at Patancheru, 2010

Trial no.

ICPH no.

Yield (kg ha-1)

Disease reaction (%)

Wilt SM

Promising hybrids 24 4280 549 (156)+ 44 50 0 24 4281 492 (156) + 44 25 0 24 4396 468(156) + 44 63 13

25 3341 615 (147)+ 95 11 0 25 4306 443 (147)+ 95 29 29

26 3360 1436 (56) + 274 25 0

27 4343 1016 (443) + 366 67 0 27 4408 858 (443) + 366 42 0 27 4134 744 (443) + 366 13 0

28 4143 264 (259) + 41 20 0 28 4417 256 (259) + 41 9 50

29 2744 716 (260) + 116 14 7 29 2745 449 (260) + 116 10 20

14

30 2722 385 (140) + 34 25 0

30 4422 320 (140) + 34 18 0 30 3766 354 (140) + 34 25 0

32 4388-2 298 (180) + 53 67 0

Disease resistant hybrids

24 4275 448 (156)+ 44 0 0 24 4395 439 (156)+ 44 0 0 24 4397 289 (156)+ 44 0 0

25 3462 449 (147)+ 95 0 0

26 4403 1131 (56) + 274 0 0 26 4399 939 (56) + 274 0 0 26 3349 807(56) + 274 0 0 26 4400 624 (56) + 274 0 0 26 3489 268 (56) + 274 0 0 26 3476 167 (56) + 274 0 0

28 4418 215(259) + 41 0 0 28 4412 105(259) + 41 0 0 28 4414 66(259) + 41 0 0 28 4413 58(259) + 41 0 0

29 4010 481 (260) + 116 0 0 29 4022 367 (260) + 116 0 0

30 4420 195 (140) + 34 0 0 30 4367 194(140) + 34 0 0

31 4427 466 (221) + 52 0 0 31 4277 358 (221) + 52 0 0

32 4387-3 263 (180) + 53 0 0 32 4372-3 225 (180) + 53 0 0

( ) yield of control in the trial

15

7 ON-FARM EVALUATION OF ELITE HYBRIDS Parbhani: During this year one kilogram seed each of a hybrid and a local variety was supplied to the

farmers. The growers were divided into three types.

1) ICPH 2671, ICPH 2740, ICPH 3762, BSMR 736, BSMR 853

2) ICPH 2671, BSMR 736

3) ICPH 2740, ICPH 3762, BSMR 736.

Besides sole cropping, the evaluations were also done under intercrop with cotton or soybean. The

seed was supplied to 85 farmers but the results were obtained from 70 farmers only (Table 12).

Table 12. Abstract of average yield of on-farm trials of pigeonpea hybrids, Parbhani, 2010

No. of trials allotted

Data received

from

Av. yield (kg ha-1)

Av. yield

(kg ha-1)

Av. yield (kg ha-1)

Av. yield

(kg ha-1)

Av. Yield

(kg ha-1)

ICPH 2671 ICPH 2740 ICPH 3762 BSMR 736 (C) BSMR 853(C)

85 74 1136.8 1130.4 1167.5 1035.6 833.33

% increase over BSMR -736

- 9.77 9.15 12.73 - -

% increase over BSMR -853

- 36.43 35.64 40.10 - -

Akola: In kharif 2010-11, a total of 150 on-farm trials (1kg each) of pigeonpea hybrid ICPH 2671 were

distributed in 31 villages, and in addition 60 on-farm trials (0.5 kg each) of ICPH 2740 were also

distributed in 28 villages in the districts of Akola, Washim, Amravati, Buldana, and Yavatmal of

Vidarbha region of Maharashtra (Table 13a-c).

16

Table 13a. Performance of pigeonpea hybrid ICPH 2671 in the on-farm trials conducted in 2010 in Maharashtra

Sr. No.

Intercropping system

Row ratio

No. of

trials

No. of Villages

Av. Gross

Plot size (m2)

Av. Net plot size

(m2)

Av. Hybrid yield

kg/plot

Av. hybrid

yield kg ha-1 on Gross plot basis

Av. Check yield

kg/plot

Av. Check

yield kg ha-1 on Gross plot basis

Std Heterosis

over check (%)

(Maruti)

1 Soybean + Pigeonpea

9:1 4

8 802.3 130.0 95.3 1438.9 84.5 1269.3 12.7 8:1 1 5:1 11 4:1 4 4:2 1

2 Mungbean +

Pigeonpea 4:1 5

5 851.3 158.1 119.3 1646.5 103.3 1408.8 15.5 4:2 8 3:1 2

3 Uradbean +

Pigeonpea 8:1 2

2 800.2 150.8 110.0 1504.1 98.1 1311.1 12.1 4:1 3 4:2 1 3:1 2

4 Cotton + Pigeonpea

8:1 1 3 1680.0 260.0 112.3 678.7 102.3 633.2 9.8 6:1 1

4:1 1 5 Jowar +

Pigeonpea 5:1 1 1 378.0 63.0 40.0 1058.2 35.0 925.9 14.3

6 Sole -- 7 2 544.3 544.3 122.1 2305.1 110.0 2062.6 11.0

Weighted mean over 55 trials

55 21 814.2 197.5 106.9 1581.1 94.5 1382.7 13.2

Total 150 trials = 95 trials vitiated

17

Table 13b. Performance of pigeonpea hybrid ICPH 2740 in on-farm trials during kharif 2010

Sr. No.

Intercropping system

Row ratio

No. of trials

No. of villages

Av. gross plot size (m2)

Av. net plot size (m2)

Av. hybrid yield

kg/plot

Av. hybrid

yield kg ha-1 on gross plot basis

Av. check yield

kg/plot

Av. check yield

kgha-1 on gross

plot basis

Std heterosis

over check (%) (Asha)

1 Soybean + Pigeonpea

8:1 2

12 493.2 86.3 69.6 1673.7 57.9 1308.1 20.3 6:1 2 5:1 13 4:1 4

2 Mungbean +

Pigeonpea 6:1 3

7 476.1 84.1 63.3 1332.0 56.1 1165.4 12.9 5:1 5 4:1 3

3 Uradbean +

Pigeonpea 8:1 1 2 378.0 49.5 65.0 1834.2 56.3 1627.0 15.6 6:1 3

4 Cotton +

Pigeonpea 12:1 2

5 688.1 81.0 55.5 909.9 53.6 881.6 3.4 8:1 8 7:1 2 6:1 1

Weighted

mean over 49 trials

49 26 545.1 80.0 63.7 1380.2 55.6 1167.2 14.7

Table 13c. Area covered under on-farm trials of hybrids in Vidarbha region during kharif 2010

Sr.

No. Seed distributed by Hybrid

Quantity of

seed distributed

(kg)

Area covered

(ha)

Av. yield (kg ha-1)

1 PDKV, Akola ICPH 2671 55.0 4.5 1581

ICPH 2740 24.5 4.5 1380

18

Gujarat: The seeds of hybrid GTH 1 produced under the project during kharif 2009 at the university

farm and distributed among the farmers in four districts of Gujarat in 2010 are as follows:

Sr. No. District Seeds (kg)

1 Sabarkantha 1260

2 Bharuch 800

3 Panchmahal 120

4 Junagadh 20

Total 2200

In addition, 25 field demonstrations were also conducted in north Gujarat in the current season under AICRP on pigeonpea. The results were not provided by the center.

Gulbarga: A total of 137 on-farm trials were conducted during this season. Of these, 54 involved ICPH 2671 while in the rest 83 trials of ICPH 2740 were evaluated in Gulbarga, Bellary, Gadag, Bidar, Raichur, and Yadagir districts of Karnataka (Table 14a-d).

Table 14. List of demonstrations on hybrid pigeonpea conducted in Karnataka, 2010

Sr. No. Details Number

01 Total number of demonstrations conducted during 2010

137

02 Number of demonstrations with ICPH 2671

a). Under protective irrigation

b). Under rainfed condition

11

48

03 Number of demonstrations with ICPH 2740

a). Under protective irrigation

b). Under rainfed condition

28

48

04 Number of demonstrations vitiated or not sown 09

Total 137

19

Table 14a. Mean performance of hybrid ICPH 2671 under protective irrigation

No. of trials

No. of farmers

Range yield (kg ha-1) Mean yield (kg ha-1) % increase over

check hybrid check hybrid check

11 11 1500-3000 1200-2000 1920.45 1688.64 13.72

Table 14b. Mean performance of hybrid ICPH2671 under rainfed conditions

No. of trials

No. of farmers



41.00 41.00 625-1450 625-1500 1165.85 1081.71 7.78

Table 14c. Mean performance of hybrid ICPH 2740 under protective irrigation

No. of trials No. of farmers



28 28 1625-2250 1250-3000 1784.36 1607.14 11.03

Table 14d.Mean performance of hybrid ICPH 2740 under rainfed conditions

No. of trials

No. of farmers

Range yield (kg ha-1) Mean yield (kg ha-1) % increase over check hybrid check hybrid check

48 48 600-1500 625-1500 1181.25 1107.29 6.68

ICRISAT: Based on MLTs and on-farm trials data three promising hybrids (ICPH 2671, 2740 and 3762)

were selected for further testing in large-scale at a greater number of locations. The performance of

these hybrids over the years and across locations was very good. In Madhya Pradesh, extensive

testing of ICPH 2671 was done in the last three years and finally it was released as ‘RV ICPH 2671’ in

20

December, 2010 (scan of Hindi version enclosed in Annexure III) by State Varietal Release

Committee.

During 2010, a total of 363 on-farm trials of three promising hybrids ICPH 2740 (226 OFT), ICPH 3762

(24 OFT), and ICPH 2671 (189 OFT) were conducted in farmers’ fields in different locations of

Karnataka, Maharashtra, Jharkhand, and Andhra Pradesh. Though this season was not conducive for

pigeonpea production, still the farmers harvested more yield from hybrids as compared to the local

checks. We received results from 28 farmers from Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra. One farmer

(Mr S S Shinde) from Latur district used the method of transplanting of hybrid plants and harvested

2000 kg acre-1 (= 5000 kg ha-1) of yield. The experience of this farmer indicated that transplanting in

pigeonpea can be beneficial under certain situations. The performance of hybrids of some farmers is

summarized in Tables 15a-b.

Table 15a. Yield data of on-farm trials of pigeonpea hybrids conducted in Maharashtra during 2010-2011

Cropping

system

No. of

farmers

Yield ( kg ha-1)ICPH 2671 Maruti

Heterosis

(%)

Rainfed PP+Cotton 4 1879 1556 20.75

Irrigated PP +Cotton 6 1904 1598 19.14

Irrigated P +Soybean 3 1533 1283 19.48

Rainfed Sole 2 2313 1738 33.08

Irrigated Sole 7 1557 1268 22.79

Total/mean 22 1837 1489 23.37

21

Table 15b. Yield data of on-farm trials of pigeonpea hybrids in Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh during 2010-2011

Sr. No.

Name of farmer Cropping system Yield (kg ha-1)

Intercrop yield

(kg ha-1) ICPH

2671 Maruti Heterosis

(%) Yavatmal District, Maharastra State

1 Shri Walmic babarao Kadam

Rainfed PP + Cotton

2040 2050 -0.48 500 2 Abhay Santhoshrao

Kadam Rainfed P P + Cotton

2000 1500 33.33 600 3 Amol Subashrao

Kadam Rainfed PP + Cotton

1875 1625 15.38 500 4 Suresh Sopanrao

Agalave Rainfed PP + cotton 1600 1050 52.38 600

Mean 1879 1556 20.75 6 Nandkumar Baburao

Kadam Irrigated PP + Cotton 2000 2000 0 500

7 Deepak Bhimraoji Kadam

Irrigated PP + Cotton 1375 937 46.7 500

8 Sachin Umakant Darne Irrigated PP + cotton 2500 1750 42.86 1000 9 Sanjay Babarao

Kartade Irrigated PP + cotton 1250 600 108.33 8000

10 Pravin Dhanyakumarji Badnare

Irrigated PP + cotton 2450 2300 6.52 1000

11 Farshul Rameshrao Dabhekar

Irrigated PP + cotton 1850 2000 -7.5 400

Mean 1904 1598 19.14 12 Subash Govindrao

Yerawar Irrigated PP + soybean 2125 1625 30.76 700

13 Umakant Marotrao Darne

Irrigated PP + soybean 1725 1675 2.98 800

14 Prafulle Durgadasrao Wankhede

Irrigated PP + soybean 750 550 36.36 700

Mean 1533 1283 19.48 15 Keshave Madharao

Chaudhari Rainfed sole 2000 1375 45.48 -

16 Manik Babanrao Kadam

Rainfed 2625 2100 25.00

Mean 2313 1738 33.08 17 Vishal Dattatray Kubde Irrigated sole 1300 1000 30 - 18 Kalyan Babanrao

Bederekar Irrigated sole 625 625 0 -

22

19 Sandeep Devidesrao Kartade

Irrigated 1375 600 129.16 800

20 Bhashkar Baburaoji Raut

Irrigated 2200 1800 22.22 -

21 Rambhau Sable Irrigated 1050 750 40 22 Mayur RDabhikar Irrigated 1900 1700 11.76 23 Pradeep A Shinde Irrigated 2450 2400 2.08 Mean 1557 1268 22.79

24

S S Shinde Latur

Transplatings 5000 - - -

Andhra Pradesh 25 G Janardhan, Medak Irrigated, sole crop 2688 1500 79.2 - 26 Balkishan Rao,

Karimnagar Rainfed, sole crop

750 575 30.4 - 27 Anthi Reddy, Ranga

reddy disatrict Rainfed, sole crop

875 550 59 Hybrid

2740/Asha 28 B Anji Reddy,

Basavapur Rainfed, sole crop

1250 750 66.66 “

ICRISAT also provided ICPH 2671 seed to 288 farmers in Jharkhand during 2010. The hybrid pigeonpea ICPH 2671 performed well in the farmer’s field. It was observed that the variations in yield were due to severe insect damage. The hybrid ICPH 2671 seeds were distributed to eight KVKs. The yield in hybrids ranged from 931 to 1865 kg/ha. (Table 15c), The mean performance of hybrids recorded 1460 kg ha-1as against the check yield of 864 kg ha-1and the % gain is 68%. The detailed location wise data is enclosed in Annexure- IV.

Table 15c: Yield data of on-farm trials of pigeonpea hybrids at BAU Ranchi, Jharkhand 2010-2011

Locations No of beneficiaries

Area(ha) Yield ( kg ha-1) Hybrid Check

% gain

Z R S Darisai 22 2.50 1865 864 115.85 K V K Gumla 22 5.00 1130 884 27.82 KVK Giridih 5 2.50 1160 864 34.25 KVK Garhwa 33 10.0 1680 940 78.72 KVK Garhwa 38 10.0 1641 910 80.32 Daltanganj 14 5.60 1203 725 65.93 Dumra 54 7.90 1694 864 96.06 Dhanbad 32 12.80 1843 864 113.31 Hazaribag 68 27.20 932 864 7.87 Total \ Mean 288 83.50 1460 864 68.98

Gujarat: No report was provided by the university.

23

8 LARGE-SCALE SEED MULTIPLICATION OF HYBRIDS AND THEIR PARENTS Parbhani: The seed of seven promising hybrids was multiplied for large scale testing in the target

regions. The seed harvested (Table 16) from the hybrids were ICPA 2043 x ICP 3525 (3kg), ICPA 2043

x BSMR 175 (5 kg), ICPA 2043 x BSMR 203 (2 kg), ICPA 2043 x ICP 10934 (3 kg), ICPA 2043 x ICP 3407

(2 kg), ICPA 2043 x TV1 (1 kg) and ICPA 2092 x ICP 3514 (1 kg).

Table 16. Large scale seed production of hybrids and their parents

Sr. No. Name of the hybrid/parent

Area (ha) Yield (kg)

1 ICPA 2043 x ICPR 2671 0.3 50 2 ICPA 2043 x ICPB 2043 0.2 15

3 ICPA 2047 x ICPB 2047 0.2 59 4 ICPA 2047 x ICPR 2740 0.4 50

5 ICPA 2092 x ICPB 2092 0.3 32 6 ICPA 2092 x ICPR 3762 0.3 60

7 ICPR 2671 (male parent) 0.2 60 8 ICPR 2740 (male parent) 0.2 30 9 ICPR 3762 (male parent) 0.2 50

Akola: Seed production of eight promising hybrids, two important male sterile lines (AKMS 05A,

AKMS 06A) and five restorers was undertaken in isolated locations using a row ratio of 1 male:4

female (Table 17).The maximum hybrid seed was harvested from the seed plot of AKPHM 10-178

(694 kg ha-1) followed by AKPHE 02-402 (391 kg ha-1). In the case of restorers the maximum seed was

harvested from ICPR 2740 (375 kg ha-1) at Wani Rambhapur followed by AKPR 402 (257 kg ha-1) at

ZARS Yavatmal. The insect damage in these plots was high, which resulted in low yields.

Table 17. Seed production of promising hybrids grown in isolation at Akola, 2010

Sr. No.

Hybrid name Plot size

(m2) Yield

(kg plot-1) Yield

(kg ha-1) Location

1 AKPHE 02-178 216 6.00 277.8 ATS, Buldana

2 AKPHE 02-402 540 21.10 390.7 ZARS, Yavatmal

3 AKPHE 05-178 216 8.00 370.4 ATS, Buldana

4 AKPHM 06-344 702 1.00 14.2* EAD, COA, Nagpur

5 AKPHM 10-178 216 15.00 694.4 ATS, Buldana

6 AKPHM 10-402 540 9.15 169.4 ZARS, Yavatmal

7 AKPHM 11-260 288 0.40 13.9* AHDS, Akola

8 ICPH 2740 4410 8.00 18.1* Karanja Dist: Washim

24

Sr. No.

Hybrid name Plot size

(m2) Yield

(kg plot-1) Yield

(kg ha-1) Location

9 ICPH 2740 1998 71.00 355.4 CDF, Wani (R), Akola

*- Low yields due to water-logging

Gulbarga: Large scale seed production program of two hybrids ICPH 2671 (160 kg) at Dharwad and

ICPH 2740 (200 kg) and their parents was undertaken at Siruguppa during 2010.

Gujarat: Three hybrids SKNPCH 0863, SKNPCH 0853, and SKNPCH 0838 were earmarked after multi-

locational testing at the national level. The seed production protocol for both hybrid seed

production and maintenance of A & R lines was finalized in the last season. As per standard protocol,

the seed production of hybrid GTH 1 was undertaken during kharif 2010 at 14 locations. However, as

a result of erratic weather conditions, particularly the three times higher rainfall and cloudy weather

condition, the whole seed production program failed.

ICRISAT: During kharif 2010, seed of four promising hybrids was multiplied of which three hybrids

ICPH 2671, ICPH 2740, and ICPH 3762 fell into the medium-duration group, and one hybrid ICPH

2433 was short duration. The seed production of hybrid ICPH 2671 was done in Rangampet,

Nadargul, and harvested 203 kg. ICPH 2740 was produced in small plots in Rangampet, Kadapa and a

total of 258 kg seed was harvested. The hybrid seed of ICPH 3762 (170 kg) was produced at ICRISAT,

Patancheru.

9 EFFECT OF SPACING AND IRRIGATION ON YIELD OF HYBRID SEED Parbhani: To develop the agronomic practices the trials were conducted at ARS, Badnapur. The

results are awaited.

Akola: No report.

Gujarat: No report

Gulbarga: No report

ICRISAT: In continuance to the agronomic studies conducted in 2008-2009, the same study was

extended in the subsequent year, but with reduced number of spacing treatments. In this season,

the seed production of the maintainer and hybrid was undertaken in the late sown conditions. The

results of the study are summarized below:

25

• Influence of spacing and irrigation on seed production of a medium-duration CMS line. The

field experiment was conducted using 4:1 and 3:1 row ratios with 75 X 30cm spacing in

Alfisols. This study showed that the optimum spacing and irrigation for producing more seed

yield of ICPA 2043 was 75 cm x 30 cm in 3:1 row ratio with irrigation at every 18 days initiated

from flower initiation to pod development, which produced seed yield of 2013 kg ha-14:1

ratio; spacing of 75 cm x 30 cm with irrigation at every 14 days internal produced the highest

seed yield of 1693 kg ha-1 (Table 18).

Table 18. Direct and interactive effects of row ratio, irrigation and planting distance on the growth and yield traits of ICPA 2043 at 0.05 level of significance

Direct and Interactive

Effects

Growth traits Yield traits Seed yield

(kg ha-

1)

Plant height (cm)

Stem diameter

(cm)

Biomass

(kg)

Branches

(no.)

Pods plant-1 (no.)

Seeds pod-1 (no.)

Weight of 100 seeds

(g)

Seed yieldplant-

1

(g)

Effect of row ratio

0.53 0.08 0.08 0.19 0.008 0.13 0.88 0.47 0.60

Effect of planting distance

0.24 0.010 0.008 0.25 <.0001 <.0001 0.09 <.0001 0.0004

Effect of Irrigation

0.82 0.47 0.86 0.68 0.41 0.47 0.31 0.22 0.46

Interaction of row ratio with irrigation

0.77 0.35 0.039 0.58 0.52 0.91 0.83 0.23 0.10

Interaction of row ratio and planting distance

0.90 0.006 0.20 0.38 0.0005 0.0002 0.64 0.022 0.08

Interaction of irrigation and planting distance

0.47 0.33 0.98 0.95 0.021 0.005 0.71 0.18 0.29

Interaction among row ratio, irrigation and planting distance

0.68 0.36 0.57 0.95 0.062 0.096 0.65 0.09 0.02

26

• Influence of spacing and irrigation on seed production of medium-duration hybrid.

An experiment was conducted in Vertisols to evaluate agronomic variability for large scale

seed production of hybrid ICPH 2671 two row ratios (4:1 and 3:1) and four spacing (75 x 30

cm, 75 x 50 cm and 150 x 30 cm and 150 x 50 cm). The study showed that interactions

arising due to any of the row ratio, irrigation and planting distance combinations were not

significantly different among the treatments for various traits. The research further

demonstrated that either of the two row ratio, two irrigation frequencies, and plant spacing

can be adopted to produce high seeds of ICPH 2671 (Table 19).

Table 19. Direct and interactive effects of row ratio, irrigation and planting distance on the growth and yield attributes of ICPA 2043

Treatment effect

Agronomic traits (P (<0.05) Yield traits (P (<0.05)

Plant height

(cm)

Stem diameter

(cm)

Biomass

(kg)

Branches

(no.)

Pods plant-1

(no.)

Seeds

pod-1

(no.)

Weight of 100 seeds

(g)

Yield per

plant

(g)

hectare

(kg)

Effect of row ratio

0.127ns 0.797ns 0.052* 0.787ns 0.344ns 0.136ns 0,340ns 0.066ns 0.096ns

Effect of planting distance

0.013* 0.528ns 0.013* 0.210ns 0.002* 0.0009** 0.023* <.0001** 0.105ns

Effect of irrigation

0.957ns 0.893ns 0.412ns 0.434ns 0.438ns 0.843ns 0.534ns 0.441ns 0.552ns

Interaction of row ratio with irrigation


Interaction of row ratio and planting distance


Interaction of irrigation and planting distance


27

Treatment effect

Agronomic traits (P (<0.05) Yield traits (P (<0.05)

Plant height

(cm)

Stem diameter

(cm)

Biomass

(kg)

Branches

(no.)

Pods plant-1

(no.)

Seeds

pod-1

(no.)

Weight of 100 seeds

(g)

Yield per

plant

(g)

hectare

(kg)

Interaction among row ratio, irrigation and planting distance


Note: *, ** – significant; ns – not significant

10 GROW–OUT TEST (GOT) Gujarat: The protocol of DNA extraction was standardized by CTab method. The DNA extracted was

pure. The molecular markers development program especially for GoT of GTH 1 and characterization

of A and R lines is under progress.

ICRISAT: The approach for phenotypic marker is being developed at ICRISAT, Patancheru to detect

hybridity in a short period of 3-4 weeks. This technology is based on a leaf marker (obcordate leaf)

which has been successfully transferred into a few A/B lines. The F1 hybrids made with such A-line

will have normal leaves. This technique is useful to identify off-types in grow-out test with the help

of phenotypic markers.

Development of nuclear and mitochondrial markers to ensure purity of parental lines is in progress. This will

help in identifying mixtures of A, B, R, hybrids and common varieties (Annexure IV).

11 TRAINING PROGRAMS AND FIELD VISITS Parbhani: One training has been organized for demonstrating seed production technology. About

100 students, 20 officers and 32 farmers participated. The information regarding male sterile lines,

their characters, male female ratio, expected yield, control measures and roguing has been given.

The students have regularly visited the seed production plot. During this year regular visits have

been made to the farmer’s field after germination, during vegetative growth, and at maturity. It

28

was not possible to visit all the farmers’ fields. However, 41 progressive farmers from Parbhani,

Nanded, Jalna, Aurangabad, Latur, Beed, Hingoli and Washim districts of Maharashtra were trained.

Akola: During 2010-11, five Farmers Field Days (Table 20) were organized at Nimbhara, Ashti,

Kanzara, Akot and Mangrul (Navghare) villages of Akola, Yavatmal and Buldana districts. One field

visit was organized at Donoda village of Yavatmal district.

Table 20. Field days and field visits organized during 2010

Sr. No. Farmer’s name and village

Date of field day

No. of participants

1 Shri. Ganeshrao Shamrao Nanote, At: Post: Nimbhara, Tq: Barshitakli, Dist: Akola

04.01.2011 80

2 Shri. Manikrao Babarao Kadam, At: Post: Donoda, Tq: Kalamb, Dist: Yavatmal

07.01.2011 (Field visit) 111

3 Shri. Vishalrao Dattatray Kubade, At: Post: Ashti, Tq: Kalamb, Dist: Yavatmal 07.01.2011 111

4 Shri. Chandrashekhar Narayan Giri, At: Post: Kanzara, Tq: Murtizapur, Dist: Akola

25.01.2011 114

5 Shri. Vilas Dinkar Bansod, At: Post: Akot, Tq: Akot, Dist: Akola

31.01.2011 102

6 Shri. Vishwasrao Punjaji Ambhore, At: Post: Mangrul (Navghare), Tq: Chikhali, Dist: Buldana

01.02.2011 112

Total 630

Gujarat: Kathol Divas was organized at Thuravas village, Dist: Sabarkantha on 18 September, 2010 in

which more than 50 scientists, 525 progressive farmers and 20 officials from private

companies/organizations were exposed to the FLDs of GTH 1 and they were trained in seed

production technology and parental line maintenance.

Gulbarga: One off-campus training of 60 farmers on hybrid seed production technology, hybrid pigeonpea

cultivation and parental line maintenance was conducted at Kamalapur, Gulbarga on 22 June 2010.

ICRISAT: ICRISAT organized three training programs at ICRISAT. A total of 203 persons were trained. This

included 30 scientists, 56 seed production officers, and 117 farmers.

29

12 FEEDBACK FROM FARMERS

Efforts will be made during this year to produce large quantity of hybrid seed and more area will be

brought under hybrids.

1) Farmers in Badnapur, Jamb and Deonandra were interested in cultivation of ICPH 2671. At

the same time seed quality improvement is necessary. Though the farmers liked this hybrid

still they felt that color variation is a problem for marketability.

2) During this year late maturing varieties/ hybrids have given higher yield as compared to

early maturing genotypes due to late rains.

3) In December there was a heavy frost, which resulted in flower drop and adversely effected

seed yield.

4) Variation with respect to flowering, maturity, and seed characters were observed.

5) The pigeonpea hybrids ICPH 2671 and ICPH 2740 exhibited good vigor as compared to other

pigeonpea varieties.

6) The branching habit of ICPH 2671 from the base of the stem is a good trait and it can be

beneficial under wide spacing.

7) About 10-20 % off-type plants with green pods and streaked pods were noticed in ICPH

2671.

8) The hybrid ICPH 2740 performed well in heavy soils of Vidarbha region.

9) Overall, farmers showed a lot of interest in adopting hybrid pigeonpea for higher returns.

10) Some farmers expressed their happiness with transplantings, which is a new technique

producing more yield as compared to normal plantings.

30

13 PUBLICATIONS Journal Articles

1. Saxena, K.B., Sultana, R., Mallikarjuna, N., Saxena, R.K., Kumar, R.V., Sawargaonkar, S.L. and Varshney, R.K. (2010). Male sterility systems in pigeonpea and their role in enhancing yield. Plant Breeding. 129:125-134.

2. Saxena, K.B. and Nadarajan, N. (2010). Prospects of pigeonpea hybrids in Indian agriculture. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1:1107-1117.

3. Saxena, K.B., Kumar, R.V., Dalvi, V.A., Pandey, L.B. and Gaddikeri, G. (2010). Development of cytoplasmic-nuclear male sterility, its inheritance, and potential use in hybrid pigeonpea breeding. Journal of Heredity. 101:497-503.

4. Mula, M.G., Saxena K.B., Kumar, R.V. and Rathore, A. (2010). Effect of spacing and irrigation on seed production of a CMS-based pigeonpea hybrid. Green Farming. 1:221-227.

5. Saxena, R.K., Saxena, K.B. and Varshney, R.K. (2010). Application of SSR markers for molecular characterization of hybrid parents and purity assessment of ICPH 2438 hybrid of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Molecular Breeding. 26:371-380.

6. Dalvi, V.A., Saxena, K.B., Luo, R.H. and Li, Y.R. (2010). An overview of male-sterility systems in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Euphytica. 173:397-407.

7. Mula, M.G., Saxena, K.B., Rathore, A. and Kumar, R.V. (2010). Response of spacing and irrigation on the seed production of CMS-lines ICPA 2043 of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) hybrid. Green Farming. 1(4): 331-335.

Conference Papers

8. Saxena, R.K., Saxena, K.B., Kumar, R.V., Kavi Kishor, P.B., Xio, Y., Cook, D.R., Town, C.D. and Varshney, R.K. (2010). Integrating genomics in pigeonpea hybrid breeding. Plant and Animal Genome XVII Conference, San Diego 9 - 13 January 2010 (Abstract).

9. Dubey, A., Bohra, A., Kumar, N., Saxena, R.K., Penmetsa, R., Cheung, F., Saxena, K.B., Gothalwal, R., Singh, D., Kavi Kishor, P.B., Upadhyaya, H., Cook, D.R. and Varshney, R.K. (2010). Large scale development of BAC-End associated SSR markers in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]. Plant and Animal Genome XVII Conference, San Diego 9 - 13 January 2010 (Abstract).

10. Mallikarjuna, N., Jadhav, D., Sharma, H.C., Senthilvel, S., Kaur, L., Byregowda, M., Varshney, R.K., Upadhyaya, H.D., Srivastava, R.K. and Saxena, K.B. (2010). Cajanusplatycarpus as the donor of useful traits for pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.] improvement. Fifth International Food Legumes Research Conference and Seventh European Conference on Grain Legumes held in Turkey, 26-30 April, 2010:200. (Abstract).

31

11. Saxena, M.K., Saxena, U., Saxena, K.B. and Khandalker, V.S. (2010). Economics of pigeonpea hybrid ICPH 2671 seed production. National Seminar on Agriculture and Global Warming: Challenges and potentials, June-05-06, 2010. (Abstract).

Pamphlets/ Leaflets

12. Vales, M.I., Saxena, K.B., Sultana, R. and Kumar, R.V. (2010). Ensuring the success of pigeonpea hybrids by focusing on purity of parental lines and appropriate management practices. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, 502 324, A.P., India, pp 7.

13. Kyu, K.L., Saxena, K.B. and Kumar, R.V. (2010). Hybrid pigeonpea seed production technology. Information Bulletin. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, Patancheru, 502 324, A.P. (Myanmar language).

Annexures

Annexure I

A. Group assortment of CMS (A) lines developed at Sardar krushinagar according to maturity, growth habit, seed size and seed colour.

Maturity Group Growth Habit Seed Size Seed colour Early Medium Late Non-determinate Determi

nate Medium

< 10g Bold > 10g Creamy White Red

A lines GT-288A, GT-33A, GT-87A, GT-100A, GT-289A, GT-290A, GT-303A, GT-305A, GT-308A, GT-310A, GT-311A, GT-610A, GT-612A, GT-613A, GT-617A, GT-618A, GT-619A, GT-621A, GT-701A, GT-702A, GT-703A, GT-704A, GT-720A, GT-721A, GT-722A, GT-723A, GT-724A, GT-725A, GT-726A, GT-728A, GT-729A, GT-730A, GT-731A, GT-732A, GT-733A, GT-734A, GT-735A, GT-736A, GT-737A, GT-738A, GT-739A

GT-301A, GT-302A, GT-304A, GT-306A, GT-307A, GT-309A, GT-401A, GT-402A, GT-403A, GT-404A, GT-405A, GT-501A, GT-502A, GT-503A, GT-504A, GT-505A, GT-601A, GT-602A, GT-603A, GT-604A, GT-605A, GT-606A, GT-607A, GT-608A, GT-609A, GT-611A, GT-614A, GT-615A, GT-616A, GT-620A, GT-622A, GT-623A, GT-624A, GT-625A GT-705A, GT-706A, GT-707A, GT-708A, GT-709A, GT-710A, GT-711A, GT-712A, GT-713A, GT-714A, GT-715A, GT-716A, GT-717A, GT-718A, GT-719A, GT-727A, GT-740A, GT-741A, GT-742A, GT-743A, GT-744A, GT-745A

GT- 406A

GT-288A, GT-33A, GT-87A, GT-301A, GT-302A, GT-303A, GT-304A, GT-305A, GT-306A, GT-307A, GT-308A, GT-309A, GT-310A, GT-311A, GT-401A, GT-402A, GT-403A, GT-404A, GT-405A,GT-406A, GT-501A, GT-502A, GT-503A, GT-504A, GT-505A, GT-601A, GT-602A, GT-603A, GT-604A,GT-605A, GT-606A, GT-607A, GT-608A, GT-609A, GT-610A,GT-611A, GT-612A, GT-613A, GT-614A, GT-615A, GT-616A,GT-617A, GT-618A,GT-619A, GT-620A, GT-621A, GT-622A,GT-623A, GT-624A, GT-625A, GT-701A, GT-702A, GT-703A, GT-704A, GT-705A, GT-706A, GT-707A, GT-708A, GT-709A, GT-710A, GT-711A, GT-712A, GT-713A, GT-714A, GT-715A, GT-716A, GT-717A, GT-718A, GT-719A, GT-720A, GT-721A, GT-722A, GT-723A, GT-724A, GT-725A, GT-726A, GT-727A, GT-728A, GT-729A, GT-730A, GT-731A, GT-732A, GT-733A, GT-734A, GT-735A, GT-736A, GT-737A, GT-738A, GT-739A, GT-740A, GT-741A, GT-742A, GT-743A, GT-744A, GT-745A

GT-100A, GT-289A, GT-290A,

GT-288A, GT-33A, GT-87A, GT-290A, GT-301A, GT-303A, GT-305A, GT-306A, GT-307A, GT-308A, GT-309A, GT-310A, GT-311A, GT-404A, GT-405A, GT-406A, GT-502A, GT-504A, GT-505A, GT-602A, GT-603A, GT-604A, GT-605A, GT-606A, GT-607A, GT-608A, GT-609A, GT-610A, GT-611A, GT-612A, GT-613A, GT-614A, GT-615A, GT-616A, GT-617A, GT-618A, GT-619A, GT-620A, GT-621A, GT-622A, GT-624A, GT-701A, GT-708A, GT-724A, GT-725A, GT-726A, GT-727A, GT-728A, GT-729A, GT-732A, GT-740A, GT-744A, GT-745A

GT-100A, GT-289A, GT-302A, GT-304A, GT-401A, GT-402A, GT-403A, GT-501A, GT-503A, GT-601A, GT-623A, GT-625A GT-702A, GT-703A, GT-704A, GT-705A, GT-706A, GT-707A, GT-709A, GT-710A, GT-711A, GT-712A, GT-713A, GT-714A, GT-715A, GT-716A, GT-717A, GT-718A, GT-719A, GT-720A, GT-721A, GT-722A, GT-723A, GT-730A, GT-731A, GT-733A, GT-734A, GT-735A, GT-736A, GT-737A, GT-738A, GT-739A, GT-741A, GT-742A, GT-743A

GT-288, GT-100A, GT-301A, GT-302A, GT-303A, GT-304A, GT-308A, GT-309A, GT-310A, GT-311A, GT-402A, GT-403A, GT-404A, GT-405A, GT-406A, GT-501A, GT-502A, GT-504A, GT-505A, GT-601A, GT-602A, GT-603A, GT-607A, GT-608A, GT-609A, GT-612A, GT-613A, GT-615A, GT-616A, GT-617A, GT-618A, GT-620A, GT-622A, GT-623A, GT-624A, GT-625A GT-703A, GT-704A, GT-705A, GT-706A, GT-708A, GT-709A, GT-710A, GT-711A, GT-712A, GT-713A, GT-714A, GT-715A, GT-717A, GT-718A, GT-722A, GT-725A, GT-730A, GT-731A, GT-733A, GT-735A, GT-736A, GT-737A, GT-738A, GT-739A, GT-740A, GT-741A, GT-743A, GT-744A, GT-745A

GT-33A, GT-87A, GT-289A, GT-290A, GT-305A, GT-306A, GT-307A, GT-401A, GT-503A, GT-604A, GT-605A, GT-606A, GT-610A, GT-611A, GT-614A, GT-619A, GT-621A, GT-701A, GT-702A, GT-707A, GT-716A, GT-719A, GT-720A, GT-721A, GT-723A, GT-724A, GT-726A, GT-727A, GT-728A, GT-729A, GT-732A, GT-734A, GT-742A

B. Group assortment of restorer (R) lines developed at Sardar krushinagar according to maturity, growth habit, seed size and seed color.

Maturity Group Growth Habit Seed Size Seed colour Early Medium Late Non-determinate Determinate Medium < 10g Bold > 10g Creamy White Red

GTR-1, GTR-3, GTR-4, GTR-8, GTR-9, GTR-10, GTR-11, GTR-13, GTR-14, GTR-20, GTR-23, GTR-28, GTR-29, GTR-30, GTR-34, GTR-35, GTR-37, GTR-45, GTR-46, GTR-47, GTR-48, GTR-49, GTR-50, GTR-51, GTR-52, GTR-53, GTR-55 GTR-56, GTR-62, GTR-63, GTR-66, GTR-67, GTR-68, GTR-71, GTR-72, GTR-73, GTR-74, GTR-76, GTR-77, GTR-78, GTR-79, GTR-81

GTR-2, GTR-5, GTR-6, GTR-12, GTR-15, GTR-16, GTR-17, GTR-18, GTR-19, GTR-21, GTR-22, GTR-24, GTR-25, GTR-26, GTR-27, GTR-31, GTR-32, GTR-33, GTR-36, GTR-38, GTR-39, GTR-40, GTR-41, GTR-42, GTR-43, GTR-44, GTR-54, GTR-57, GTR-58, GTR-59, GTR-61, GTR-64, GTR-65, GTR-69, GTR-70, GTR-75, GTR-80

GTR-7, GTR-60

GTR-1, GTR-2, GTR-3, GTR-4, GTR-5, GTR-6, GTR-7, GTR-8, GTR-9, GTR-10, GTR-12, GTR-13, GTR-14, GTR-15, GTR-16, GTR-17, GTR-18, GTR-19, GTR-20, GTR-21, GTR-22, GTR-23, GTR-24, GTR-25, GTR-26, GTR-27, GTR-28, GTR-29, GTR-30, GTR-31, GTR-32, GTR-33, GTR-34, GTR-36, GTR-37, GTR-38, GTR-39, GTR-40, GTR-41, GTR-42, GTR-43, GTR-44, GTR-45, GTR-46, GTR-47, GTR-48, GTR-49, GTR-50, GTR-51, GTR-52, GTR-53, GTR-54, GTR-55, GTR-56, GTR-57, GTR-58, GTR-59, GTR-60, GTR-61, GTR-62, GTR-63, GTR-64, GTR-67, GTR-68, GTR-69, GTR-70, GTR-72, GTR-73, GTR-75, GTR-76, GTR-77, GTR-78, GTR-79, GTR-80, GTR-81

GTR-11, GTR-35, GTR-65, GTR-66, GTR-71, GTR-74

GTR-2, GTR-6, GTR-7, GTR-8, GTR-9, GTR-12, GTR-13, GTR-16, GTR-17, GTR-19, GTR-20, GTR-21, GTR-22, GTR-23, GTR-24, GTR-25, GTR-26, GTR-29, GTR-30, GTR-34, GTR-35, GTR-36, GTR-37, GTR-38, GTR-39, GTR-40, GTR-41, GTR-42, GTR-43, GTR-44, GTR-45, GTR-46, GTR-47, GTR-48, GTR-49, GTR-50, GTR-51, GTR-52, GTR-53, GTR-54, GTR-55 GTR-57, GTR-66, GTR-67, GTR-71, GTR-72, GTR-74, GTR-81

GTR-1, GTR-3, GTR-4, GTR-5, GTR-10, GTR-11, GTR-14, GTR-15, GTR-18, GTR-27, GTR-28, GTR-31, GTR-32, GTR-33, GTR-56, GTR-58, GTR-59, GTR-60, GTR-61, GTR-62, GTR-63, GTR-64, GTR-65, GTR-68, GTR-69, GTR-70, GTR-73, GTR-75, GTR-76, GTR-77, GTR-78, GTR-79, GTR-80

GTR-2, GTR-3, GTR-6, GTR-7, GTR-8, GTR-9, GTR-11, GTR-18, GTR-22, GTR-24, GTR-27, GTR-31, GTR-32, GTR-34, GTR-37, GTR-38, GTR-39, GTR-40, GTR-41, GTR-42, GTR-47, GTR-48, GTR-50, GTR-51, GTR-53, GTR-54, GTR-56, GTR-57, GTR-58, GTR-60, GTR-63, GTR-64, GTR-65, GTR-66, GTR-67, GTR-69, GTR-70, GTR-72, GTR-74, GTR-75, GTR-76, GTR-79, GTR-80

GTR-1, GTR-4, GTR-5, GTR-10, GTR-12, GTR-13, GTR-14, GTR-15, GTR-16, GTR-17, GTR-19, GTR-20, GTR-21, GTR-23, GTR-25, GTR-26, GTR-28, GTR-29, GTR-30, GTR-33, GTR-35, GTR-36, GTR-43, GTR-44, GTR-45, GTR-46, GTR-49, GTR-52, GTR-55 GTR-59, GTR-61, GTR-62, GTR-68, GTR-71, GTR-73, GTR-77, GTR-78, GTR-81

Annexure II

A. Characterization of different CGMS (A) lines developed at Sardar krushinagar

Sr.N

o.

Recu

rren

t Pa

rent

CMS

lines

Days

to

flow

er

Days

to

mat

urity

Plan

t hei

ght

Bran

ches

/ pl

ant

Pods

/ pl

ant

Seed

s/ p

od

Pod

leng

th

100-

seed

w

eigh

t

Plan

t typ

e

Flow

er

colo

ur

Seed

col

our

Yiel

d/ p

lant

(g

)

1 MS 288F

GT 288A 96 140 136 5.5 136 3.7 4.1 9.6 NDT Y CW 41

2 Pusa 33

GT 33A 78 136 132 6.3 108 3.8 4.1 8.7 NDT Y R 28

3 ICPL 87

GT 87A 93 132 76 5.7 96 3.9 4.2 9.1 SDT Y R 26

4 GT 100

GT 100A 88 137 107 5.6 135 3.9 4.4 10.2 DT Y W 36

5 SKNP 289

GT 289A 95 141 75 4.7 87 4.0 4.7 10.6 DT R R 29

6 SKNP 290

GT 290A 83 142 96 4.5 127 3.7 4.7 9.9 DT Y R 24

7 BDN 2 GT 301A 122 175 125 7.1 160 3.6 4.2 9.7 NDT Y W 48

8 SKNP 88-3

GT 302A 110 153 138 6.8 129 3.7 4.1 10.1 NDT Y W 40

9 SKNP 9523

GT 303A 106 148 181 8.5 146 3.5 4.1 9.7 NDT Y W 41

10 T 15-15

GT 304A 110 168 162 9.6 153 4.0 4.6 10.3 NDT Y W 54

11 T 21 GT 305A 105 148 130 6.1 141 3.7 4.2 9.9 NDT Y R 44

12 ICPL 84060

GT 306A 108 156 124 11.0 126 3.5 4.1 8.9 NDT Y R 36

13 BSMR 736

GT 307A 116 162 112 8.0 112 3.0 3.4 9.7 NDT Y R 32

Sr.N

o.

Recu

rren

t Pa

rent

CMS

lines

Days

to

flow

er

Days

to

mat

urity

Plan

t hei

ght

Bran

ches

/ pl

ant

Pods

/ pl

ant

Seed

s/ p

od

Pod

leng

th

100-

seed

w

eigh

t

Plan

t typ

e

Flow

er

colo

ur

Seed

col

our

Yiel

d/ p

lant

(g

)

14 ICPL 87051

GT 308A 101 148 132 10.0 187 3.8 4.2 9.3 NDT R W 44

15 B 12 GT 309A 112 159 129 9.0 143 3.6 4.1 9.6 NDT Y R 38

16 BDN 31

GT 310A 96 143 89 14.0 148 3.6 4.6 9.4 NDT Y W 34

17 Pusa 33-1

GT 311A 78 136 132 6.3 115 3.8 4.1 8.7 NDT Y W 29

18 ICPL 5507

GT 401A 119 159 142 4.6 118 3.8 4.1 10.6 NDT Y R 27

19 ICPL 7078

GT 402A 117 162 146 5.3 142 3.9 4.2 10.2 NDT Y W 32

20 AGS 5 GT 403A 126 178 152 6.8 129 4.1 4.3 10.1 NDT Y W 32

21 AGS 28

GT 404A 118 173 161 4.3 142 3.7 4.0 9.3 NDT Y W 36

22 AGS 30

GT 405A 119 174 139 5.4 118 3.5 3.8 9.4 NDT Y W 32

23 BSMR 736

GT 406A 126 181 149 6.2 124 3.4 3.7 9.8 NDT Y W 32

24 ICPL 7622

GT 501A 108 160 152 6.4 129 3.3 3.5 10.0 NDT Y W 35

25 AGS 89

GT-502A 128 180 162 5.4 132 3.6 3.7 9.2 NDT Y W 36

26 AGS 65

GT 503A 113 161 158 8.8 149 3.2 3.4 10.2 NDT Y R 36

27 AGS 46

GT 504A 124 171 154 6.9 152 4.1 4.3 9.1 NDT Y W 31

28 AGS 55

GT 505A 110 157 164 7.4 146 3.8 3.9 9.1 NDT Y W 40

Sr.N

o.

Recu

rren

t Pa

rent

CMS

lines

Days

to

flow

er

Days

to

mat

urity

Plan

t hei

ght

Bran

ches

/ pl

ant

Pods

/ pl

ant

Seed

s/ p

od

Pod

leng

th

100-

seed

w

eigh

t

Plan

t typ

e

Flow

er

colo

ur

Seed

col

our

Yiel

d/ p

lant

(g

)

29 AGS 132

GT 601A 121 166 145 6 85 5 6.4 10.01 NDT Y W 30

30 AGS 130

GT 602A 123 167 160 8 205 5 6.2 9.08 NDT Y W 32

31 AGS 123

GT 603A 118 165 185 6 130 5 6.0 8.01 NDT Y W 35

32 AGS 102

GT 604A 127 167 145 8 295 5 5.4 7.05 NDT Y R 40

33 AGS 101

GT 605A 116 164 190 8 305 4 6.3 8.02 NDT Y R 32

34 AGS 100

GT 606A 126 172 170 6 180 5 6.2 9.07 NDT Y W 36

35 AGS 99 GT 607A 127 170 180 9 310 4 5.2 9.01 NDT R W 35

36 AGS 98 GT 608A 130 175 145 7 230 4 4.5 8.72 NDT Y W 26

37 AGS 96 GT 609A 128 174 165 8 230 5 5.5 9.00 NDT Y W 38

38 AGS 95 GT 610A 100 145 130 6 140 4 4.6 9.21 NDT Y R 39

39 AGS 94 GT 611A 129 169 165 8 305 4 5.0 8.54 NDT Y R 42

40 AGS 93 GT 612A 99 143 130 4 120 5 5.3 7.22 NDT Y W 45

41 AGS 91 GT 613A 98 140 165 9 305 5 5.7 7.45 NDT Y W 41

42 AGS 84 GT 614A 124 159 165 5 120 4 5.2 8.21 NDT Y R 23

43 AGS 76 GT 615A 127 170 125 4 120 4 4.7 9.0 NDT R R 26

Sr.N

o.

Recu

rren

t Pa

rent

CMS

lines

Days

to

flow

er

Days

to

mat

urity

Plan

t hei

ght

Bran

ches

/ pl

ant

Pods

/ pl

ant

Seed

s/ p

od

Pod

leng

th

100-

seed

w

eigh

t

Plan

t typ

e

Flow

er

colo

ur

Seed

col

our

Yiel

d/ p

lant

(g

)

44 AGS 58 GT 616A 122 168 165 5 100 4 5.2 8.23 NDT Y W 53

45 AGS 57 GT 617A 97 142 155 8 220 4 5.4 8.54 NDT Y W 29

46 AGS 53 GT 618A 100 146 160 5 230 5 5.8 9.02 NDT Y W 32

47 AGS 52 GT 619A 103 149 180 9 310 5 5.7 8.14 NDT Y R 34

48 AGS 50 GT 620A 119 170 175 7 315 4 5.1 7.88 NDT Y W 38

49 AGS 49 GT 621A 98 142 150 5 185 4 5.2 8.21 NDT Y W 45

50 AGS 45 GT 622A 124 172 155 5 180 4 5.3 9.12 NDT Y W 41

51 AGS 44 GT 623A 136 177 160 9 320 4 5.7 11.00 NDT Y W 46

52 AGS 9 GT 624A 126 171 155 8 240 5 5.3 9.24 NDT Y W 33

53 GAUT 97111

GT 625A 129 168 150 6 245 6 6.8 11.05 NDT Y W 36

54 ICP 12009

GT 701A 99 145 117.7 6.9 111.5 3.8 4.3 8.78 SDT Y R 55

55 ICP 8503

GT 702A 101 148 126.7 7.1 119.2 4.0 5.0 11.48 NDT Y R 34

56 ICP 13175

GT 703A 104 147 148.8 8.5 162.7 3.5 3.9 11.88 NDT Y W 58

57 ICP 14388

GT 704A 100 149 133.0 8.1 141.8 4.3 4.5 14.03 NDT Y W 49

58 ICP 15352

GT 705A 102 151 158.2 10.6 141.8 4.1 4.6 11.38 NDT Y W 46

Sr.N

o.

Recu

rren

t Pa

rent

CMS

lines

Days

to

flow

er

Days

to

mat

urity

Plan

t hei

ght

Bran

ches

/ pl

ant

Pods

/ pl

ant

Seed

s/ p

od

Pod

leng

th

100-

seed

w

eigh

t

Plan

t typ

e

Flow

er

colo

ur

Seed

col

our

Yiel

d/ p

lant

(g

)

59 GAUT 97-74

GT 706A 103 157 121.8 10.2 141.7 3.8 4.3 14.03 NDT Y W 38

60 AGS 4 GT 707A 106 158 163.3 8.7 144.3 4.2 5.0 10.50 NDT Y R 32

61 AGS 55

GT 708A 103 153 140.7 9.0 180.1 4.1 4.5 9.33 NDT Y W 45

62 AGS 68

GT 709A 109 159 146.0 9.2 151.9 4.5 4.9 12.00 NDT Y W 33

63 AGS 85

GT 710A 113 160 166.2 9.1 154.1 4.0 4.5 11.15 NDT Y W 45

64 AGS 112

GT 711A 105 155 141.7 7.9 112.8 4.6 4.9 13.83 NDT Y W 29

65 AGS 113

GT 712A 113 156 142.7 5.6 109.2 4.2 4.5 12.58 NDT Y W 38

66 AGS 115

GT 713A 112 157 150.7 7.6 124.3 4.1 4.7 14.85 NDT Y W 39

67 AGS 116

GT 714A 106 158 147.4 8.0 95.6 4.9 5.4 11.65 NDT Y W 31

68 AGS 125

GT 715A 104 154 154.1 7.1 121.8 3.3 3.8 12.25 NDT Y W 33

69 AGS 127

GT 716A 109 156 151.3 6.6 133.1 4.6 5.2 13.70 NDT Y R 38

70 AGS 134

GT 717A 103 153 139.3 6.6 135.3 3.9 4.3 12.28 NDT Y W 31

71 AGS 136

GT 718A 111 155 163.5 7.7 95.7 3.9 4.7 14.68 NDT Y W 32

72 BSMR 198

GT 719A 108 155 146.2 8.1 131.9 4.4 5.1 11.70 NDT Y R 35

73 ICP 8504

GT 720A 101 149 142.8 9.1 136.0 4.5 4.8 13.85 NDT R R (Black) 51

Sr.N

o.

Recu

rren

t Pa

rent

CMS

lines

Days

to

flow

er

Days

to

mat

urity

Plan

t hei

ght

Bran

ches

/ pl

ant

Pods

/ pl

ant

Seed

s/ p

od

Pod

leng

th

100-

seed

w

eigh

t

Plan

t typ

e

Flow

er

colo

ur

Seed

col

our

Yiel

d/ p

lant

(g

)

74 ICP 11720

GT 721A 99 144 104.9 6.6 68.7 3.1 3.7 10.30 SDT Y R 30

75 ICP 14410

GT 722A 101 148 142.6 8.1 130.2 3.0 3.8 10.63 NDT Y W 34

76 ICP 14421

GT 723A 101 143 147.1 10.0 160.4 3.5 3.9 10.28 NDT Y R 33

77 ICP 14760

GT 724A 104 148 141.9 9.1 117.0 3.8 4.0 9.23 NDT R R 32

78 ICP 352

GT 725A 99 147 142.2 7.1 110.6 4.0 4.3 8.83 NDT Y W 30

79 ICP 450

GT 726A 98 145 119.4 8.0 103.5 4.0 3.9 9.33 NDT Y R 31

80 ICP 4295

GT 727A 107 153 136.3 5.5 117.0 3.9 4.7 7.85 NDT YLRS R 34

81 ICP 5433

GT 728A 103 147 117.6 7.0 122.0 3.9 3.7 5.60 SDT Y R 36

82 ICP 7620

GT 729A 99 145 121.6 8.0 123.1 3.6 3.5 6.80 NDT Y R 32

83 ICP 8976

GT 730A 107 146 137.7 5.6 112.7 3.5 4.5 10.30 NDT YLRS W 34

84 ICP 9123

GT 731A 98 142 142.5 7.8 117.6 3.5 3.6 10.55 NDT Y W 32

85 ICP 9260

GT 732A 102 147 126.8 6.1 103.3 3.9 4.5 8.80 NDT Y R 34

86 ICP 10948

GT 733A 102 148 142.2 4.8 80.2 4.0 4.5 13.83 NDT Y W 31

87 ICP 12180

GT 734A 103 148 126.2 6.1 93.1 3.7 4.3 11.93 NDT Y R 32

88 ICP 14390

GT 735A 102 148 118.6 6.2 116.6 3.8 4.4 10.18 NDT Y W 50

Sr.N

o.

Recu

rren

t Pa

rent

CMS

lines

Days

to

flow

er

Days

to

mat

urity

Plan

t hei

ght

Bran

ches

/ pl

ant

Pods

/ pl

ant

Seed

s/ p

od

Pod

leng

th

100-

seed

w

eigh

t

Plan

t typ

e

Flow

er

colo

ur

Seed

col

our

Yiel

d/ p

lant

(g

)

89 ICP 15367

GT 736A 103 147 136.3 6.9 105.6 4.4 4.7 11.13 NDT Y W 49

90 GAUT 9539

GT 737A 99 146 133.0 7.2 104.2 4.0 4.9 12.03 NDT YRS W 32

91 GAUT 97104

GT 738A 99 146 135.2 8.6 118.6 4.5 5.0 12.53 NDT Y W 34

92 GAUT 97107

GT 739A 104 149 147.8 6.5 84.2 5.0 5.3 12.53 NDT Y W 32

93 AGS 41

GT 740A 109 157 123.8 7.1 112.5 4.0 4.3 9.89 NDT Y W 31

94 AGS 47

GT 741A 105 153 120.5 6.2 99.3 4.0 4.0 12.60 SDT Y W 31

95 AGS 64

GT 742A 104 153 150.4 5.5 93.7 4.0 4.9 11.98 NDT Y R 35

96 AGS 78

GT 743A 110 156 126.0 5.5 88.7 4.5 4.7 11.16 NDT Y W 30

97 AGS 103

GT 744A 106 155 142.7 8.1 124.8 4.0 4.1 9.93 NDT Y W 32

98 AGS 107

GT 745A 110 155 162.6 6.2 111.8 4.6 4.8 9.90 NDT R W 35

B. Characterization of established restorer (R) lines developed at Sardar krushinagar

Sr. No. Restorer

Characters DF DM PH BP PP SP PL TW PT FC SC

1 GTR 1 99 142 155 10.2 195 4.1 4.2 10.0 NDT Y Orange 2 GTR 2 118 172 137 6.3 176 4.2 4.6 9.5 NDT RSY Brown 3 GTR 3 102 138 146 5.6 165 4.3 4.3 10.2 NDT Y White 4 GTR 4 100 138 143 6.5 153 5.1 5.2 10.5 NDT Y Red 5 GTR 5 113 170 146 6.5 176 4.2 4.3 10.3 NDT Y Red 6 GTR 6 111 155 172 9.1 188 4.3 4.2 8.5 NDT Y White 7 GTR 7 130 210 185 8.4 136 3.5 4.0 9.4 NDT Y White 8 GTR 8 97 145 127 10.3 143 3.4 4.1 9.2 NDT Y White 9 GTR 9 92 137 139 9.2 162 4.2 4.2 9.5 NDT Y White

10 GTR 10 103 148 153 13.1 207 3.7 4.0 10.1 NDT Y Orange 11 GTR 11 95 145 90 4.2 130 3.9 4.1 10.1 DT Y White 12 GTR 12 110 165 100 4.3 122 3.5 4.2 9.7 NDT Y Orange 13 GTR 13 88 142 110 3.4 140 3.6 3.9 9.7 NDT Y Orange 14 GTR 14 89 146 125 5.3 123 3.3 4.3 10.1 NDT Y Orange 15 GTR 15 105 159 125 4.2 130 3.6 4.2 10.2 NDT Y Orange 16 GTR 16 100 156 110 6.4 160 3.8 4.1 9.9 NDT Y Orange 17 GTR 17 115 167 165 4.3 180 3.5 3.6 9.8 NDT RSY Orange 18 GTR 18 100 158 150 6.1 155 3.9 4.0 10.2 NDT Y White 19 GTR 19 109 158 136 7.0 112 4.3 4.5 9.1 NDT Y Orange 20 GTR 20 101 148 122 8.0 84 3.3 3.4 9.0 NDT Y Orange 21 GTR 21 118 168 14 6.0 96 4.0 4.3 8.9 NDT Y Orange 22 GTR 22 110 162 154 8.0 107 3.0 4.1 9.5 NDT Y White 23 GTR 23 94 136 128 12.0 142 3.0 3.8 9.0 NDT Y Orange 24 GTR 24 117 161 186 9.0 162 4.0 4.3 9.6 NDT Y White 25 GTR 25 124 172 127 6.0 55 3.0 3.2 9.2 NDT Y Orange 26 GTR 26 104 152 165 12 65 3.4 4.2 9.82 NDT Y R 27 GTR 27 106 154 165 8 115 4.0 4.5 10.03 NDT Y W

Sr. No. Restorer


28 GTR 28 97 140 112 7 135 4.0 4.3 10.12 NDT Y R 29 GTR 29 100 144 105 8 110 4.0 4.5 9.92 NDT Y R 30 GTR 30 101 146 95 5 60 3.0 3.5 9.10 NDT Y R 31 GTR 31 110 161 190 8 140 4.0 4.2 10.35 NDT Y W 32 GTR 32 104 152 165 12 124 3.7 4.1 10.32 NDT Y W 33 GTR 33 102 153 168 11 121 3.6 3.9 10.12 NDT YWR R 34 GTR 34 93 136 144 5 62 3.7 4.1 9.98 NDT Y W 35 GTR 35 98 142 84 5 95 4.0 5.2 9.02 DT Y R 36 GTR 36 102 154 160 8 72 4.0 3.2 8.23 NDT Y R 37 GTR 37 100 146 148 7 108 3.0 3.3 8.26 NDT Y W 38 GTR 38 110 164 155 7 122 4.0 4.1 7.56 NDT Y W 39 GTR 39 113 172 165 8 203 4.0 3.8 9.21 NDT Y W 40 GTR 40 115 168 161 10 258 4.0 3.2 8.24 NDT Y W 41 GTR 41 112 162 170 10 66 4.0 4.5 7.26 NDT Y W 42 GTR 42 102 151 152 7 97 4.0 4.1 7.25 NDT Y W 43 GTR 43 120 172 164 5 125 4.0 4.2 8.25 NDT Y R 44 GTR 44 124 173 175 10 165 4.0 4.4 9.24 NDT Y R 45 GTR 45 98 142 167 6 138 4.0 4 7.56 NDT Y R 46 GTR 46 97 148 140 6 136 4.0 4.2 8.24 NDT Y R 47 GTR 47 100 146 126 4 148 4.0 4.2 7.54 NDT Y R 48 GTR 48 98 140 127 3 107 4.0 4.5 8.11 NDT Y R 49 GTR 49 96 139 138 5 87 4.0 3.8 8.14 NDT Y R 50 GTR 50 100 142 142 3 76 4.0 4.3 9.21 NDT Y W 51 GTR 51 96 142 120 8 97 4.0 4.3 8.25 NDT Y R 52 GTR 52 90 135 112 6 148 4.0 4.2 8.78 NDT Y R 53 GTR 53 87 137 127 5 211 4.0 4.4 7.89 NDT Y W 54 GTR 54 107 154 152 6 118 4.0 4.0 8.12 NDT Y W 55 GTR 55 98 142 118 7 132 4.0 4.2 8.16 NDT Y R 56 GTR 56 102 149 127.1 4.0 87.5 4 5.0 10.50 NDT YRS W

Sr. No. Restorer


57 GTR 57 118 160 140.4 2.6 65.5 4 4.0 9.89 NDT YRS W 58 GTR 58 121 155 130.0 4.5 55.6 3 4.0 10.76 NDT YRS W 59 GTR 59 119 160 90.5 4.0 85.2 4 5.0 11.00 NDT YRS R 60 GTR 60 126 156 130.1 5.2 110.5 5 5.0 11.25 NDT Y W 61 GTR 61 109 150 110.2 5.1 60.0 4 4.5 10.95 NDT YRS R 62 GTR 62 100 148 100.0 2.0 54.0 4 4.5 10.40 NDT Y R 63 GTR 63 100 149 90.2 4.0 62.0 4 4.0 13.76 NDT Y W 64 GTR 64 118 156 115.9 5.0 78.0 3 3.0 12.65 NDT YRS W 65 GTR 65 120 158 115.7 4.8 75.9 3 3.4 10.79 DT Y W 66 GTR 66 98 146 70.0 3.7 55.7 3 5.0 8.90 DT Y W 67 GTR 67 100 148 65.1 3.0 60.0 4 4.5 7.35 NDT Y W 68 GTR 68 98 145 125.1 2.0 61.5 4 5.0 10.85 NDT Y R 69 GTR 69 103 153 155.6 3.0 65.5 3 4.0 14.30 NDT Y W 70 GTR 70 101 154 95.0 2.5 65.0 4 4.0 11.40 NDT YRS W 71 GTR 71 97 143 75.0 3.5 85.0 4 4.0 8.58 DT YRS R 72 GTR 72 103 148 115.9 6.2 110.0 4 4.0 8.95 NDT YRS W 73 GTR 73 106 148 130.0 2.0 75.0 4 4.5 10.60 NDT YRS R 74 GTR 74 97 145 70.0 2.2 57.0 5 5.0 7.00 DT Y W 75 GTR 75 100 152 115.4 3.5 75.5 3 4.0 10.35 NDT Y W 76 GTR 76 103 147 140.2 5.0 85.8 4 4.5 10.40 NDT YRS W 77 GTR 77 105 148 110.5 3.0 75.2 4 5.5 10.40 NDT YRS R 78 GTR 78 103 148 125.9 4.0 95.3 4 4.5 11.25 NDT YRS R 79 GTR 79 104 149 115.5 6.0 127.0 5 4.5 11.25 NDT YRS W 80 GTR 80 103 150 145.0 2.0 135.0 4 3.8 10.00 NDT YRS W 81 GTR 81 101 149 95.5 2.5 149.0 3 2.9 8.35 NDT YRS R

DF=Days to flower, DM=Days to maturity, PH=Plant height (d), BP=Branches/plant, PP=Pods/plant, SP=Seeds/pod, PL=Pod length (cm), TW=Test weight (g.), PT=Plant type, FC=Flower colour, SC=Seed colour

Annexure III

Annexure IV

Location wise On-Farm Trial Data from JHARKHAND, 2010

FRONTLINE DEMONSTRATION ON RED GRAM YEAR- 2010-2011 ZRS Darisai

ICPH 2671

Sl. No

Name of farmer Village Seed(kg) (Area)

Yield (kg.) Yield (kg/ha)

Disease/pest infestation

1. Sri. Shashadhar Mahato

Pairagori 4.0 (0.22) 440 2000 4.5 /4.0

2. Sri.Hiralal Mahato Pairagori 5.0 (0.27) 550 2037 5.0 /5.5 3. Sri. ThakurDas

Murma Naldoha 2.0 (0.11) 190 1727 3.5 /Nil

4. Sri. Somay Hansda Naldoha 3.0 (0.16) 320 2000 Nil /4.0 5. Sri. Mangal Murmu Naldoha 3.0 (0.16) 290 1812 2.0 /6.5 6. Sri.Lal Mohan

Hansda Naldoha 3.0 (0.16) 315 1968 6.0 /4.0

7. Sri. Ram Rai Murmu Naldoha 3.0 (0.16) 325 2031 3.5 /3.5 8. Sri. Ramsai Murmu Naldoha 2.0 (0.11) 200 1818 6.5 /5.5 9. Sri.Dhanai Murmu Naldoha 3.0 (0.16) 335 2093 8.0 /Nil 10 Sri. Khila Murmu Naldoha 2.0 (0.11) 180 1636 7.0 /5.5 11 Sri. Supai Murmu Naldoha 2.0 (0.11) 190 1727 8.5 /4.0 12. Sri.Daso Murmu Naldoha 2.0 (0.11) 210 1909 9.5 /2.5 13. Sri. Ram Sarat

Murmu Naldoha 2.0 (0.11) 175 1590 10.0 /3.5

14. Sri.Priyanath Hansda Naldoha 2.0 (0.11) 170 1545 Nil /3.5 15. Sri. Bodhu Murmu Naldoha 2.0 (0.11) 200 1818 7.5 /2.5 16. Sri.Karunath Murmu Naldoha 1.0 (0.05) 100 2000 4.5 /4.0 17. Sri. K. Chandra

Hansda Naldoha 2.0 (0.11) 195 1772 2.0 /Nil

18. Sri.Bablu Murmu Naldoha 1.0 (0.05) 100 2000 6.5 /3.5 19. Sri. Dasrath Murmu Naldoha 1.0 (0.05) 090 1800 7.0 /4.0 20. Sri.Rabindra Murmu Naldoha 3.0 (0.16) 250 1562 3.5 /Nil 21. Sri. Padlochan Samal Kokpara 1.0 (0.05) 110 2200 7.0 /4.2 22. Sri.Mirtujnjay Mogra Khanrduli 1.0 (0.05) 100 2000 8.0 /2.5 Total - 50.0 kg

(2.50ha)

Mean 1865

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Gumla A-IV Vikas Bharti Bishunpur FLD Report (2010-11)

Source of seed – BAU, Ranchi Area: 5 ha Variety: ICPH-2671

SL Name Village Block Area (ha)

Yield (kg/ha) IP FP

1. Jogendra Oraon

Kurag Ghaghra 0.3 1480 1080

2. Raju Oraon


3. Kuwar Oraon


4. Huri Oraon Kurag Ghaghra 0.2 1260 910

5. Alexender Kerketta

Dahudargaon Chainpur 0.3 1300 860

6. Amrit Tirky Dahudargaon Chainpur 0.3 1250 740

7. Izac Tirky Dahudargaon Chainpur 0.2 1040 690

8. Dilip Kerketta


9. Yujen Kerketta


10. Bertha Ekka

Nawatoli Chainpur 0.1 1040 890

11. Krishna Kerketta

Nawdiha Karanjtoli

Ghaghra 0.1 1090 920

12. Laxman Sah

Kulabira Gumla 0.3 1150 970

13. Loharman Sahu

Kulabira Gumla 0.3 1370 1040

14. Sukhram Oraon

Telgaon Gumla 0.3 920 780

15. Gandur Oraon

Belgaon Gumla 0.3 1070 850

16. Kailash Nag

Telgaon Gumla 0.1 1250 1070

17. Dewku Bhagat

Olmunda Sisai 0.3 850 780

18. Khajwul Khan


19. Bhirya Oraon


20. Bishwanath Oraon


21. Jitendra Oraon


22.

Chamu Khadiya


Total 5.0 11.3 8.84

BIRSA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, RANCHI A-IV KRISHI VIGYAN KENDRA, GIRIDIH

F NO. BAU/ KVK (GIR) / / 41 Date: 14.5.11

Yield data of hybrid pigeonpea KVK, Giridih

Program Coordinator

S.no Name of farmer Address Yield (kg /ha )

1. Kamdeo Mahto Manikbad , Deori 1230

2. Vakil Mahto Manikbad , Deori 1180

3. Dinesh Prasad Verma Dasdih , Gandey 1190

4. Saryu Prasad Verma Dasdih , Gandey 1080

5. Varun Prasad Verma Dasdih , Gandey 1120

Mean 1160

A-IV

Krishi Vigyan Kendra Garhwa FLD on Hybrid Pigeon pea

Crop: Hybrid arhar Variety: ICPH-2671 Season: Kharif, 2011

Date of Sowing: 15-20July, 2010 Date of harvesting: 26 Feb- 05 March, 2011

Crop Variety Area (ha)

No. of Demo.

Yield (kg/ha) hybrid Local check

(kg/ha)

B: C ratio Improved Local

Max. Min. Mean

Pigeonpea ICPH-2671 10.0 33 2060 1470 1680 940 3050 2080

Sl. No.

Farmers’ Name Village Block Yield (kg/ha)

1 Sri Ramesh Mahto Meral East Meral 1510 2 Sri puranChandran Murarka Parashwar Bhandaria 1970 3 Sri mandeep Ram Ahirpurwa Nagar Utary 1490 4 Sri Sita Ram Ahirpura Nagar Utary 1630 5 Anwar Ali Sangma Sangma 1850 6 Sri Birendra Mahto Meral East Meral 1990 7 Sri Arjun P d.Kushwaha Meral East Meral 1860 8 Sri Raj Kumar Mahto Meral East Meral 1770 9 Sri Naresh Sao Meral East Meral 1980 10 Sri Mathura Mahto Meral East 2060 11 Sri Sukal Sao Meral East Meral 1680 12 Sri ChandeshwarMahto 1560 13 Sri Raj Deo Mahto Meral East Meral 1750 14 Sri Din DyalChoubey 1850 15 Sri Chandra Sekhar Mehta Hasandag Meral 1660 16 Sri Sunil Kr Singh Kalayanpur Meral 1910 17 Sri Nur Md.Ansari Kalayanpur Meral 1860 18 Sri Sher Md.Ansari Adhoury Meral 1750 19 Sri Chandra Deo Dubey Akalwani Meral 1810 20 Sri Ram Prawesh Dubey Meral East Meral 1560 21 Sri Ram Naresh Manto Meral East Meral 1670 22 Sri Vikash Kumar Meral East Meral 1470 23 Sri Nand Lai Kushwaha Nrayanpur Garhwa 1870 24 Sri Rajesh Mehta Hansker Garhwa 1570 25 Sri Ram Prawesh Mehta Meral East Meral 1660 26 Sri Bhola Mehta Meral East Meral 1560 27 Sri Naveen Yadav Damaran Ranka 1480 28 Sri DharmendraKr. Mehta Adhoura Meral 1570 29 Sri Nand Kishore Pandey Kundi Garhwa 1630 30 Sri Rasid Ansary Kalayanpur Garhwa 1710 31 Sri Ram Mani Kumar Narayanpur Garhwa 1610 32 Sri Vinod Kr.Dubey Amrora Kharoundhi 1640 33 Sri Salim Ansary Dhuanti Garhwa 1500 Grand total/mean 1680

KRISHI VIGYAN KENDRA, GARHWA BIRSA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, KANKE, RANCHI-834006

FLD (ICPH-2671) Yield Report Crop: Pigeonpea Season: Kharif 2010 Variety: ICPH-2671(Hybrid) Date of sowing: 20-25 July, 2010 Date of harvesting: 16-22 Feb, 2011 Area: 10.0 ha Performance of FLD

Crop No of Farmers

Area (ha)

Demo. Yield kg/ha Increase in yield % Hyb Loc Mean Yield of local

Pigeonpea 38 10 2025 1284 1641 910 80.32

S No.

Name Address Village Block

Area (ha)

Yield (kg/ha)

1 Sri Amresh kr. mehta Narayan pur Garhwa 0.10 1482 2 Sri Arun Kumar Narayan pur Garhwa 0.10 1778 3 Sri Ashok Mehta Narayan pur Garhwa 0.40 1729 4 Sri Biraj Kr. Mehta Narayan pur Garhwa 0.40 1729

5 Sri Braj Kishore Mahto Jatta Garhwa 0.20 1588 6 Sri Brajesh Kr.Tiwary Karua Kala Garhwa 0.10 1782 7 Sri Dewendra Kr.Tiwary Karua Kala Garhwa 0.10 1383 8 Sri Dilip Kr Singh Narayan pur Garhwa 0.40 1704 9 Sri Dilip Mahto Narayan pur Garhwa 0.60 1811 10 Sri Jai Gopal Mehta Narayan pur Garhwa 0.40 1605 11 Sri Jitendra Kr. Mehta Narayan pur Garhwa 0.40 1753 12 Sri Jitendra Kumar Narayan pur Garhwa 0.20 1482 13 Sri Kanhaiya Prasad Narayan pur Garhwa 0.20 1580 14 Sri Mathura Mehta Narayan pur Garhwa 0.10 1284 15 Sri Nand Gopal Singh Narayan pur Garhwa 0.20 1588 16 Sri Pradeep Prasad Narayan pur Garhwa 0.40 2025 17 Sri Rabindra Mahto Narayan pur Garhwa 0.10 1679 18 Sri Raghubir Mahto Narayan pur Garhwa 0.10 1580 19 Sri Raj Kumar Pandey Bhandariya Garhwa 0.40 1556 20 Sri Rakesh Kr. Kushwaha Narayan pur Garhwa 0.40 1729 21 Sri Rakesh Kumar Narayan pur Garhwa 0.20 1482 22 Sri Ram Chandar Mehta Mahulia Garhwa 0.20 1482 23 Sri Ram Lagan Mahto Narayan pur Garhwa 0.40 1778 24 Sri Ram Lal mehta Narayan pur Garhwa 0.20 1679 25 Sri Ram Pravesh Mehta Narayan pur Garhwa 0.40 1588 26 Sri Ramdhani Rajwar Narayan pur Garhwa 0.20 1778 27 Sri Ravi Kundal Narayan pur Garhwa 0.20 1630 28 Sri Ravi Ranjan Kushwaha Narayan pur Garhwa 0.30 1877 29 Sri Rohit Kumar Narayan pur Garhwa 0.30 1778 30 Sri Sanjay Kr. Singh Narayan pur Garhwa 0.20 1679 31 Sri Santosh Kr.Mehta Narayan pur Garhwa 0.10 1580 32 Sri Sarabjeet Mahto Narayan pur Garhwa 0.20 1630

S No.

Name Address Village Block

Area (ha)

Yield (kg/ha)

33 Sri Shiv Lal Mahto Narayan pur Garhwa 0.40 1605 34 Sri Syam lal Mehta Narayan pur Garhwa 0.10 1679 35 Sri Umesh Mehta Narayan pur Garhwa 0.10 1383 36 Sri Vijay kushwaha Narayan pur Garhwa 0.40 1679 37 Sri Vinod Mehta Narayan pur Garhwa 0.40 1803 38 Sri Vishawnath Mahto Narayan pur Garhwa 0.40 1704 Total/Mean 10.00 1641

Table: Grain yield kg/ha of ICPH 2671 pigeonpea hybrid at farmer’s field (Sua,Kaudia,Daltongunj and Medeninagar) 2010 season.

S No.

Farmer’s name Grain yield( kg/ha)

T1–ICPH2671 T2- Bahar

(farmer’ variety)

1 Shri Arvind Yadav 1180 858

2 Shri Vinay Singh 1429 745

3 Shri Rajmani Singh 1460 954

4 Shri Chandan Yadav 940 525

5 Shri Omprakash Singh 1475 995

6 Shri Radhakant Thakur 1255 805

7 Shri Ajay Kumar Thakur 1510 875

8 Shri Sudheswar Singh 1160 510

9 Shri Avadhkishore Yadav 1395 905

10 Smt Anju Devi 1325 665

11 Shri Tribhuvan Singh 1172 760

12 Shri Kuldeep Thakur 690 451

13 Shri Devlal Singh 811 396

14 Shri Mohan Yadav 1045 711

Mean yield (kg/ha) 1203 725

• Pod borer complex (Maruca spp. & Helicoverpa spp.) attack was severe at flowering stage. • 20-40 percent loss in yield was estimated in pigeonpea (hybrids as well as HYV’S)

NAIP; DUMKA, Pigeonpea ICPH 2671

Village Farmers Name Area ha

Yield kg

Productivity (kg/ha)

Karela 1 Budhrai kisku 0 144 170 1180 2 Suresh Tudu 0 150 155 1033 3 Thakur Murmu 0 160 155 968 4 Som Murmu 0 160 Fail 5 Ramchandra

Hansdak 0 100 85 850

6 Chota Dhuma Murmu

0 160 180 1125

7 Babu Ram Murmu

0 160 200 1250

8 Charan Murmu 0 160 172 1075 9 Budhan

Hembram 0 144 140 972

Palasa 10 Nirmala Devi 0 050 54 1080

11 Santa Devi 0 040 42 1050 12 Kunti Devi 0 032 36 1125 13 Patiya Devi 0 030 30 1000 14 Gunna Devi 0 045 66 1466 15 Bateshwar Rauth 0 032 32 1000 16 Puloo das 0 032 36 1125 17 Kelu Das 0 030 30 1000 18 Ram Nath Musuf 0 150 166 1106 19 Gulab Rai 0 320 450 1406 20 Karma Narayan

Rai 0 300 350 1166

21 Raju Mohali 0 080 80 1000 22 Ravilal Mohali 0 100 105 1050 23 Rajesh Mohali 0 150 162 1080 24 Dabloo Mohali 0 060 70 1166 25 Nimakanth

Mandal 0 320 460 1437

26 Arun Pandit 0 300 410 1366 27 Arjun Thakur 0 300 350 1166

Andipur 28 Binod Mahato 0 300 330 1100

29 Gunnadhar Mahato

0 280 300 1071

30 Binadhar Mahato

0 320 388 1212

Guhiyajori

Village Farmers Name Area ha

Yield kg

Productivity (kg/ha)

31 Motilal Baski 0 100 110 1100 Bhounra

32 Basanti Soren 0 200 240 1200 33 Labri Murmu 0 100 110 1100 34 Dhulin Murmu 0 050 80 1600 35 Muru Kisku 0 150 170 1133 36 Krit Kiran

Marandi 0 160 165 1031

37 Sondi Soren 0 140 150 1071 38 Parwati Murmu 0 280 300 1071 39 Ashok Kumar 0 120 140 1166 40 Surai Hansda 0 090 124 1377 41 Parmeshwar

Murmu 0 060 70 1166

42 Rameshwar Murmu

0 060 66 1100

43 Binod Tudu 0 080 90 1125 44 Barish Tudu 0 240 280 1166 45 Dunlal Marandi 0 160 166 1037 46 Sudhir Murmu 0 330 480 1454 47 Babudan Murmu 0 130 130 1000 48 Gomesh Soren 0 160 180 1125 49 Pulin Murmu 0 240 300 1250 50 Devilal Tudu 0 080 90 1125 51 Bodilal Murmu 0 120 140 1166 52 Lakhiram Hansda 0 100 120 1200

Karmatar

53 Anil Murmu 0 160 155 968 54

Budilal Hembram 0 080 88 1100

Total/Mean 7 999 9148

1. Intercrop of pigeonpea variety ICPH 2671 and groundnut: KVK Dhanbad

Sl. No.

Name of farmer Village Block Seed to farmer(kg)

Yield (kg/ha)

PPea Gnut PPea Gnut 1 MrNarmadeshwar Prasad Singh Ramkanali Nirsa 5 16 2700 3800 2 Mr Kashi Prasad Mahto Karitanr Bagmara 5 16 2000 3600 3 Mr Parmeshwar Singh Chaudhary Jaypur Govindpur 5 16 2700 3600 4 Mr Sukh Deo Mahto Aamdih Dhanbad 5 16 1950 2500 5 Mr Manohar Hembram Pandeydih Baliapur 5 16 2250 3600

2. Intercrop of pigeonpea variety ICPH 2671 and black gram: KVK Dhanbad

Sl. No.

Name of farmer Village Block Seed to farmer (kg)

Yield (qha-1)

PPea

Black gram

PPea

Black gram

1 Mr Doman Mahto Dhawachita Bagmara 25 25 20 25 2 Mr Kashi Prasad Mahto Karitanr 25 25 20 22 3 Mr Parmeshwar Singh Chardhary Jaypur Govindpur 25 25 27 28 4 Mr Kali Mahto Bangaro Tundi 25 25 27 29 5 Mr Chandra Mohan Roy Jitpur Tundi 25 25 19 17 6 MrBharat Mahto Bagdaha Bagmara 25 25 27 25 7 MrKhagendra Singh Chardhary Bastipur Govindpur 25 25 20 19 8 MrBhupati Bhushan Mahto Dhokhra Dhanbad 25 25 26 25 9 MrDilip Kumar Mahto Bagmara Baliapur 25 25 195 18 10 MrShiv Nandan Mahto Dhokhra Dhanbad 25 25 195 17

3. Sole crop of pigeonpea variety ICPH2671: KVK Dhanbad

Sl. No.

Name of farmer Village Block Seed to farmer

(kg)

Yield (qha-1)

1 Mr Umar Ali Ansari Brahmandiha Baliapur 3 27 2 Mr Manohar Hembram Pandeydih Baliapur 3 225 3 Mr Samir Kuma Murmu Pandeydih Baliapur 3 195 4 Mr Kali Charan Mahto Bangaro Tundi 3 27 5 Mr Chandra Mohan Roy Jitpur Tundi 3 19 6 Mr Bharat Mahto Bagdaha Bagmara 3 27 7 Mr Khagendra Singh Chaudhary Bastipur Govindpur 3 20 8 Mr Raja Ram Mahto Dhokhra Dhanbad 3 20

9 Mr Shiv Nandan Mahto Dhokhra Dhanbad 3 27

4. Sole crop of Pigeonpea variety Birsa Arhar -1: Source – BAU, Ranchi

Sl.No. Name of farmer Village Block Seed to farmer (kg

)

Yield (qha-1)

1 Mr Iswar Mahto Baradaha Baliapur 10 52 2 Mr Daulat Ram Mahto Bagdaha Bagmara 10 52 3 Mr Badal Chandra Mahto Baradaha Baliapur 10 52 4 Mr Jagap Rajwar Baradaha Baliapur 10 43 5 Mr Iswar Mahto Baradaha Baliapur 10 52 6 Mr Gautam Rajwar Baradaha Baliapur 10 52 7 Mr Nirmal Mahto Baradaha Baliapur 10 43 8 Mr Usha Devi Baradaha Baliapur 10 52

Hybrid pigeonpea yield (ICPH 2671) at Hazaribag

Sl. No.

Name of Farmers Yield (q/ha)

Village: Siladih 1 Pratap Narain Singh 100 2 Sarangdhar Singh 50 3 Bhola Singh 44 4 Ramsinghasan Singh 130 5 Ranjeet Singh 110 6 Divakar Singh 60 7 Kailash Singh 50 8 Laxman Singh 40 9 Madak Miya 105

10 Kishori Paswan 80 Average 769 Village: Balia

1 Gayani Singh 185 2 Prabhu Singh 170 3 Jagdish Mahto 175 4 Ramdhani Ram 130 5 Ishwar Mahto 150 6 Sitan Mahto 60 7 Kameshwar Mahto 80 8 Sarju Mahto 55 9 Kailash Mahto 110

10 Dhaneshwar Mahto 80 11 Basudev Mahto 70 12 Gobardhan Mahto 130 13 Nirmal Mahto 100 14 Chander Mahto 40 15 Jahur Miya 50 16 Nizam Miya 50 17 Lipakat Miya 30 18 Amrit Mahto 30

Sl. No.

Name of Farmers Yield (q/ha)

19 Ashok Ram 60 20 Raghu Mahto 42 21 Bhuno Mahto 65

Average 886 Villages: Punai

1 Nandlal Dev 130 2 Rajo Dev 100 3 Birendera Dev 146 4 Punkaj Dev 225 5 Suman Dev 100 6 Pradeep Dev 120 7 Goutam Dev 80 8 Ramrakha Dev 95 9 Kedar Ravani 150

10 Goutam Kumar 120 11 Pratap Dev 50 12 Akhilesh Dev 90

Average 1171 Villages: Choria

1 Nand Kishore Singh 110 2 Rameshwar Singh 100 3 Master Saheb 95 4 Pradeep Singh 80

Average 962 Villages: Lohrikala

1 Ramkumar Mahto 130 2 Omprakash Yadav 125 3 Ishwar Mahto 55 4 Srimati Kunti Devi 60 5 Dineshwar Mahto 75 6 Jaleshwar Mahto 30 7 Umesh Mahto 100 8 Lalo Mahto 110 9 Pema Mahto 65

10 Gayani Mahto 45 11 Lakhan Mahto 120 12 Satyendra Mahto 112 13 Srimati Arti Devi 55 14 Kedar Mahto 90 15 Pati Mahto 85 16 Parmeshwar Mahto 92 17 Sukhdev Yadav 90 18 Baleshwar Mahto 70 19 Gujari Devi 82 20 Ramchandera Mahto 210 21 Khemlal Mahto 40

Average 876

Hybrid pigeonpea yield (ICPH 2671) at Hazaribag

Sl.No. Name of Farmers Yield (q/ha)

Village: Siladih, 1 Pratap Narain Singh 100 2 Sarangdhar Singh 50 3 Bhola Singh 44 4 Ramsinghasan Singh 130 5 Ranjeet Singh 110 6 Divakar Singh 60 7 Kailash Singh 50 8 Laxman Singh 40 9 Madak Miya 105

10 Kishori Paswan 80 Average 769 Village: Balia

1 Gayani Singh 185 2 Prabhu Singh 170 3 Jagdish Mahto 175 4 Ramdhani Ram 130 5 Ishwar Mahto 150 6 Sitan Mahto 60 7 Kameshwar Mahto 80 8 Sarju Mahto 55 9 Kailash Mahto 110

10 Dhaneshwar Mahto 80 11 Basudev Mahto 70 12 Gobardhan Mahto 130 13 Nirmal Mahto 100 14 Chander Mahto 40 15 Jahur Miya 50 16 Nizam Miya 50 17 Lipakat Miya 30 18 Amrit Mahto 30 19 Ashok Ram 60 20 Raghu Mahto 42 21 Bhuno Mahto 65

Average 886 Villages: Punai

1 Nandlal Dev 130 2 Rajo Dev 100 3 Birendera Dev 146 4 Punkaj Dev 225 5 Suman Dev 100 6 Pradeep Dev 120 7 Goutam Dev 80 8 Ramrakha Dev 95 9 Kedar Ravani 150

Sl.No. Name of Farmers Yield (q/ha)

10 Goutam Kumar 120 11 Pratap Dev 50 12 Akhilesh Dev 90

Average 1171 Villages: Choria

1 Nand Kishore Singh 110 2 Rameshwar Singh 100 3 Master Saheb 95 4 Pradeep Singh 80 Average 962 Villages: Lohrikala

1 Ramkumar Mahto 130 2 Omprakash Yadav 125 3 Ishwar Mahto 55 4 Srimati Kunti Devi 60 5 Dineshwar Mahto 75 6 Jaleshwar Mahto 30 7 Umesh Mahto 100 8 Lalo Mahto 110 9 Pema Mahto 65

10 Gayani Mahto 45 11 Lakhan Mahto 120 12 Satyendra Mahto 112 13 Srimati Arti Devi 55 14 Kedar Mahto 90 15 Pati Mahto 85 16 Parmeshwar Mahto 92 17 Sukhdev Yadav 90 18 Baleshwar Mahto 70 19 Gujari Devi 82 20 Ramchandera Mahto 210 21 Khemlal Mahto 40

Average 876

Photographs

5

ARS, GULBARGA

Highlights - National Food Security Missionnfsm.gov.in/Pulses/Doorstep/PR2010-11-1.pdf · growing...

Documents

Transcript of Highlights - National Food Security Missionnfsm.gov.in/Pulses/Doorstep/PR2010-11-1.pdf · growing...