Here project mindmap

1
The HERE Project Background 2008-2011 part of What Works? Student Retention & Success funded by HEFCE Paul Hamlyn Foundation Partners Nottingham Trent University Bournemouth University University of Bradford Previously worked together on Learnhigher CETL Areas of research Impact of 'doubting' on retention Impact programme teams make on retention definition of doubting Doubting likely to be a normal part of transition process Therefore doubters= We define doubters as those students who have doubts strong enough to have considered withdrawing at some point non-doubters those who have not Previous studies into doubting Rickinson & Rutherford Mackie Roberts et al Research methodology Pilot studies NTU 2008 Welcome Week survey (n=1059 BU 2009 interviews with programme staff interviews with withdrawn students Student Transition Surveys all 3 institutions March - May 2009 (n = 873) Feb - May 2011 (n=1063) Focus groups & interviews all 3 institutions 46 student participants Programme audits all 3 institutions 10 pro- grammes programme teams interviewed students surveyed Findings a) Approx 1/3 of all 1st yr students have doubts 37% in 2009 32% in 2011 b) Doubters are more likely to leave than non-doubters non-doubters 98% of non-doubting survey respondents were still in HE the academic year after starting doubters 92% of doubting respondents were still in HE c) Doubters report a poorer quality experience compared to non-doubters gap between expectations and experience Non-doubters 12% Doubters 29% d) Doubters usually report more than one reason for doubting 2.1 reasons on average e) The primary reasons for doubting relate to the programme But, this was students' no1 priority feedback particularly important Other reasons for doubting lifestyle accommodation f) 4 main reasons why doubters stayed Support from friends & family Adapting to the course personal commitment/ drive Future goals particularly employability g) Primary times for considering leaving either side of Christmas In our study, few doubters pre-arrival h) Different degrees of doubting However, even amongst those who had decided to leave, not all chose to do so i) Some student groups more likely to doubt than others Females more likely to doubt males more likely to leave Recommendations manage factors that lead to doubting help students make the transition to HE Improve communication & relationships with staff Identify and respond to students at risk Help students make more informed choices in first place support students to stay Improve social integration Improve sense of belonging Foster student motivation Encourage active engagement Ensure good communication & access to student support The HERE Project.mmap - 25/11/2011 -

description

 

Transcript of Here project mindmap

Page 1: Here project mindmap

The HERE Project

Background

2008-2011

part of What Works? Student Retention & Success funded by

HEFCE

Paul Hamlyn Foundation

Partners

Nottingham Trent University

Bournemouth University

University of Bradford

Previously worked together on Learnhigher CETL

Areas of research Impact of 'doubting' on retention

Impact programme teams make on retention

definition of doubting

Doubting likely to be a normal part of transition process

Therefore

doubters=

We define doubters as those students who have doubts strong enough to have considered withdrawing at some point

non-doubters those who have not

Previous studies into doubtingRickinson & Rutherford

Mackie

Roberts et al

Research methodology

Pilot studies

NTU 2008 Welcome Week survey (n=1059

BU 2009interviews with programme staff

interviews with withdrawn students

Student Transition Surveys all 3 institutionsMarch - May 2009 (n = 873)

Feb - May 2011 (n=1063)

Focus groups & interviews all 3 institutions 46 student participants

Programme audits all 3 institutions

10 pro-grammes

programme teams interviewed

students surveyed

Findings

a)

Approx 1/3 of all 1st yr students have doubts

37% in 2009

32% in 2011

b)

Doubters are more likely to leave than non-doubters

non-doubters

98% of non-doubting survey respondents were still in HE the academic year after starting

doubters92% of doubting respondents were still in HE

c)

Doubters report a poorer quality experience compared to non-doubtersgap between expectations and experience

Non-doubters12%

Doubters29%

d)

Doubters usually report more than one reason for doubting2.1 reasons on average

e)

The primary reasons for doubting relate to the programme

But, this was students' no1 priorityfeedback particularly important

Other reasons for doubtinglifestyle

accommodation

f)4 main reasons why doubters stayed

Support from friends & family

Adapting to the course

personal commitment/ drive

Future goalsparticularly employability

g)Primary times for considering leavingeither side of Christmas

In our study, few doubters pre-arrival

h)Different degrees of doubting

However, even amongst those who had decided to leave, not all chose to do so

i)

Some student groups more likely to doubt than othersFemales more likely to doubtmales more likely to leave

Recommendations

manage factors that lead to doubting

help students make the transition to HE

Improve communication & relationships with staff

Identify and respond to students at risk

Help students make more informed choices in first place

support students to stay

Improve social integration

Improve sense of belonging

Foster student motivation

Encourage active engagement

Ensure good communication & access to student support

The HERE Project.mmap - 25/11/2011 -