Hepatitis E - Diagnostics and Standardization
-
Upload
cornelia-adlhoch -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
723 -
download
2
Transcript of Hepatitis E - Diagnostics and Standardization
www.pei.de
Hepatitis E
Diagnostics and Standardization
1st ECDC Hepatitis E Virus Expert Group Meeting
Stockholm, 9th-10th December, 2015
Sally A. Baylis, Division of Virology,
Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany
Virology Division
1972 Federal Agency for Sera and Vaccines
2009 Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines Marketing authorization of human and veterinary medicines
Approval of clinical trials
Inspections
Pharmacovigilance
Official batch release testing for blood products, vaccines etc.
Testing laboratory for in vitro diagnostics devices (IVDs)
Research related to the above
2005 WHO Collaborating Centre for Quality Assurance
…… of Blood Products and In Vitro Diagnostics
2013 WHO Collaborating Centre for Vaccines
Paul-Ehrlich-Institut
Virology Division
Good diagnostics – critical
Correct diagnosis of hepatitis E
Prevalence/incidence of hepatitis E cases
Seroprevalence as a reflection of population exposure
Implementation of any screening programmes
Issues
Lack of awareness of HEV in differential diagnosis of acute
hepatitis/liver abnormalities
Hampered by assays lacking sensitivity, specificity, standardization
Diagnostics for Hepatitis E – Getting it Right
Virology Division
Clinical presentation - acute hepatitis
Jaundice, anorexia, hepatomegaly, abdominal pain/tenderness,
nausea/vomiting, fever etc.
Biochemical markers
↑ Alanine/aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase
Confirmation of HEV infection
Detect virus or components
Particles (EM – stool)
RNA (blood, stool)
Ag (blood, stool)
Detect anti-HEV
IgM
IgG
IgA (?)
Diagnosis of Hepatitis E
Kamar et al., 2012 Lancet
Virology Division
Current infection - acute
HEV RNA
HEV RNA + anti-HEV IgM
HEV RNA + anti-HEV IgG
HEV RNA + anti-HEV IgM + anti-HEV IgG
Anti-HEV IgM + IgG (rising)
Current infection - chronic (immunocompromised)
HEV RNA (± anti-HEV) > 3 months
VL testing – monitoring therapy
Past infection
Anti-HEV IgG
Diagnosis of Hepatitis E – Laboratory Testing
Virology Division
WHO IS “Gold Standard” of biological reference materials
International Unit (IU) - uniform reporting system
Basis for calibration of assays, references materials
Allows comparison of different assays
WHO Standardization - Traceability
International Standard
2º Reference Materials
Calibration Standards
Working Reagents
Diagnostic Assays
EQA Materials
Virology Division
Detection of HEV RNA “gold standard” - active viraemia
PEI proposed the development of a WHO International
Standards for HEV RNA for NAT assays in 2009
Endorsed by Expert Committee on Biological Standardization
Initial study Q4, 2009 - Q1, 2010
HEV NAT assay performance - blinded panel of samples
Zoonotic strains of HEV gt 3a, 3b, 3f and gt 4c
Blood donor materials (Japan, Germany)
Determine a strain to develop into a WHO IS
20 laboratories, 10 different countries
In-house assays, with one exception
Standardizing HEV RNA Assays - Background
Virology Division
HEV Strains Investigated in 1st Study
Genotype Virus strain HEV RNA
(copies/ml)
Anti-HEV
IgM/IgG
ALT (IU/L)
3a HRC-HE104 1.6 x 107 -/- 36
3b JRC-HE3 2.5 x 107 +/- 398
3f RKI 1.3 x 106 -/- Negative
4c HRC-HE15 1.0 x 106 -/- 505
Analysis based upon partial
ORF2 sequence
Virology Division
Nominal concentration
(log10 copies/ml) 6.2 5.2 4.2 3.2 2.2 1.2
Lab no. 1 + + + +/- - -
2 a + + + + + -
2 b + + + + +/- -
3 + + + + + -
4 + + + + - +/-
5 + + + + + -
6 + + + + - -
7 + + + + - -
8 + + + - + -
9 + + + + - -
10 + + + - +/- -
11 a + + - - - -
11 b + + +/- - - -
12 + + + + + +
13† + + + + - -
14 + + + + + +
15 a + + + + - -
15 b + + + + - -
16 + + + + - -
17 + + + + - -
18 a + + + - - -
18 b + + + + - -
19 - - - - - -
20 + + + - +/- -
Total number of tests 24 24 24 24 24 24
Percentage positive 96 96 92/88 75/67 38/25 13/8
Example - Qualitative Analysis of HRC-HE104 (Genotype 3a)
Virology Division
Nominal concentration
(log10 copies/ml) 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0
Lab no. 1 + + +/- - -
2 a + + - - -
2 b + + - - -
3 + + + + -
4 +/- + +/- - -
5 + + - - -
6 + + + +/- -
7 + + +/- - -
8 + - + - -
9 + + + + -
10 + + - - +
11 a + + - - -
11 b + + - - -
12 + + + + -
13 + + + +/- +/-
14 + + + + +
15 a - - - - -
15 b + + - - -
16 + + + + -
17 + + + + -
18 a + + - - -
18 b + + - - -
19 - - - - -
20 + - - - -
Total number of tests 24 24 24 24 24
Percentage positive 92/88 83 50/38 33/25 4/0
Example - Qualitative Analysis of HRC-HE15 (Genotype 4c)
Virology Division
Example - Analysis of Titres and CT Values - HRC-HE104
Baylis et al.,
J Clin Micro, 2011
Virology Division
Detection of HEV antigen is not as sensitive as NAT
New assays offer greatly improved sensitivity
Zhao et al., J Viral Hepatol, 11, 957-963
Wen et al., J Clin Microbiol, 53, 782-788
Detection of HEV Antigen
Genotype HEV RNA
(copies/ml)Antigen
HEV RNA
(copies/ml)Antigen
3a 1.6 x 106 pos. 1.6 x 105 neg.
3b 2.5 x 106 pos. 2.5 x 105 neg.
3f 1.3 x 105 neg. 1.3 x 104 neg.
4c 1.0 x 105 pos. 1.0 x 104 pos.
Wantai Assay
Virology Division
Issues of sensitivity (independent of strain)
~100- to 1000-fold difference - majority of assays
Issues of specificity
One false positive result, genotyping by the lab in question detected
gt 1 (not included in the panel)
Wide range of copy numbers reported
Real-time PCRs out-performed conventional (nested) PCR
Demonstrates need for assay standardization
Further details:
Baylis et al., J Clin Microbiol, 2011 49:1234-9
1st Collaborative Study – Conclusions
Virology Division
The following strains were lyophilized in September 2010
HRC-HE104 (genotype 3a) – WHO International Standard
JRC-HE3 (genotype 3b) – Japanese National Standard
Drs Okada & Mizusawa, National Institute for Infectious Diseases
Collaborative study – Q1, 2011
Blinded replicate samples; 4 assay runs
Data returned by 23 laboratories (10 countries); all in -
house assays
21 qualitative data sets (end point dilution analysis)
14 quantitative data sets (reporting in copies/ml)
Development of the WHO IS for HEV RNA
Virology Division
Potencies and Relative Potencies of Participants Results
Potency relative to candidate IS
= difference in estimated log10 units/ml + assigned
value of candidate IS (5.39 log10 IU/ml)
quant. assays (white - copies/ml)
qual. assays (blue - NAT-detectable units/ml)
Potencies
Virology Division
1st WHO IS for HEV RNA established in October 2011
Japanese NIID – simultaneously established a national standard
250,000 International Units/ml
The IS is available from the PEI (code # 6329/10)
Restriction 5 vials per lab per year
The standard has been distributed since March 2012
Uses
Preparation of secondary standards
Define analytical sensitivities
Compare assay performance, EQA reporting, define TT dose etc.
Further details - http://www.pei.de
Baylis et al., Emerg Infect Dis, 2013;19:729-35
Establishment of the 1st WHO IS for HEV RNA
Virology Division
WHO ECBS endorsed panel proposal in October 2011
All four genotypes & important sub-genotypes
Strains from plasma (n=8)
Strains from stool (n=3) diluted in pooled plasma
Lyophilized
Collaborative study, Q4, 2014- Q1/2, 2015
24 laboratories, 14 different countries
Evaluate samples concurrently with the WHO IS
Range of qual./quant. assays (in-house; commercial)
Simultaneously calibrating a secondary standard (HEV 3f)
Council of Europe/EU Commission
Implementation of HEV NAT screening for S/D plasma in EU
International Reference Panel – HEV Genotypes
Virology Division
Introduction of HEV NAT for S/D plasma – Ph. Eur.
Development of a Biological Reference Preparation
(BRP)
EDQM, Council of Europe and the EU Commission
Dr Eriko Terao
Candidate BRP for HEV RNA
Genotype 3f HEV strain - German plasma donor
6000 vials lyophilized
Calibration in IU/ml against the WHO IS in genotype panel study
Report reviewed by the EDQM BSP steering committee
Biological Standardisation Programme project
(BSP127)
Virology Division
Adlhoch et al., Vox Sang. 2009
A regular plasma donor was diagnosed with acute hepatitis and elevated levels of ALT
Negative for HAV, HBV, HCV, EBV, CMV and adenovirus
Tested for anti-HEV - IgM positive
Robert Koch-Institut was notified and a look-back study was performed
A genotype 3f virus was identified - donor worked in a slaughter house
HEV Infection in a German Plasma Donor
Virology Division
HEV Infection in a German Plasma Donor Contd.
Adlhoch et al., Vox Sang 2009
ELISA
MP Biomedicals/Genelabs
ELISA
Mikrogen
Immunoblot
Mikrogen
ELISA
Euroimmun
ELISA
Wantai
IgM IgG IgM IgG IgM IgG IgM IgG IgM IgG
+ + - +/- +/- +/- + +/- + -
Virology Division
Genotype 2
Genotype 3
Genotype 4
Genotype 1
Origin of WHO HEV Genotype Panel Strains
Virology Division
HQ389543 3 England
AF060668 3a USA
AB089824 3a Japan
WHO IS AB630970 3a Japan
AB074918 3a Japan
AB074920 3a Japan
AB291962 3b Japan
AB246676 3b Japan
8570/13 AB630971 3b Japan
JQ034516 3c Germany
8571/13 JN995569 3c Sweden
JQ034514 3c Germany
FJ705359 3c Germany boar
8574/13s 3 France
JQ013792 3 France rabbit
GU937805 3 China rabbit
FJ906896 3 China rabbit
FJ906895 3 China rabbit
8572/13 JN995564 3e Germany
JQ953665 3e France pig
8573/13 JN995573 3f Sweden
BRP FJ956757 3f Germany
EU495148 3f France
AB369687 3f Japan
AB291961 3f Japan
FJ610232 4d China pig
AY594199 4g China pig
AB108537 4g China
8576/13 4g Japan
AB091395 4c Japan
AB097812 4c Japan
AB074915 4c Japan
8575/13 4c Japan
AB291959 4c Japan
AB161717 4c Japan
M74506 2a Mexico
8577/13s 2a Mexico
AY204877 1e Chad
8569/13 1e Sudan
AY230202 1d Morocco
L25595 1b China
M80581 1b Pakistan
L08816 1b China
D11092 1b China
X99441 1a India
AF051830 1a Nepal
M73218 1a Myanmar
AF185822 1a Pakistan
8567/13 1a India
FJ457024 1a India
8568/13s 1a India
AY535004 avian
94
100
100
100
42
89
100
61
60
99
89
88
65
77
40
99
88
71
36
53
20
93
69
92
99
99
88
61
84
81
40
60
97
94
73
50
85
48
79
35
68
48
92
90
69
84
86
49
0.02
Genotype 3
Genotype 4
Genotype 2
Genotype 1
3a
3b
3c
3
3e
3f
4g
4c
2a
1e
1a
Analysis based upon
partial RdRp
sequence
Virology Division
HEV in European Plasma Donors
Selection of strains from blood donors to reflect
clnically important genotypes
Nucleotide Substitution per 100 residues0
29.1510152025
D_N001113105171D_N001113082834P_N001213900311
P_N001212901361P_N001213900152
P_N001213900726D_N001112090844NL_Donor_12
P_N001214900744
P_N001213906705P_N001213910627
P_N001213908973P_N001213907985P_N001213908062P_N001112085481NL_Donor_15
P_N001212912417P_N001213901721P_N001213907677
P_N001213901631P_N001211907235NL_Patient_04
P_N001214903106
P_N001212902562D_N000113083892
D_N001113129349D_N001113129308
P_N001213903457P_N001214903706
P_N001213905608D_N000111204385NL_Donor_05
FJ705359_3i
P_N001213906628
P_N001213905961P_N001211903682
P_N001214901309
P_N001210910016NL_Patient_03
P_N001213908064P_N001213906323P_N001212908053
P_N001213907300Germany_6Sweden_2
P_N001214900585D_N001113091139
P_N001213980747D_N001113905084
P_N001211907392NL_Patient_07
D_N001811030409NL_Donor_04
P_N001214902034P_N001214902688
D_N000313078482P_AMC_21172902NL_Patient_05D_N000311136809
P_N001212910164French_Donor_12
P_N001212907511P_N001213905916
P_N001212910296P_N001211910745
P_N001210988310D_N001112240056D_N000311181536NL_Donor_10
Sweden_8Sweden_11
D_N000312028013NL_Donor_11
P_N001214903354D_N000313050878
Germany_20P_N001213906287P_N001213909683
D_N001211117594NL_Donor_07
P_AMC_2011P_N001212910998
P_N001212911077
P_N001212910704P_N001211915955NL_Patient_06
P_N001213907293Germany_7
D_N000313051864P_LUMC_13043210
P_N001212902862P_N001212904706
D_N000112080777NL_Donor_16
P_N001212904901
P_N001214903597D_N000113154350
D_N000313100849D_N001111236578NL_Donor_09
D_N000311079197NL_Donor_03
D_N001111001934NL_Donor_02
French_Donor_4French_Donor_15
French_Donor_5FJ600536_3c
D_N001811283203NL_Donor_08
Sweden_5French_Donor_8
French_Donor_17AF516178_3A
AF466662_3ASweden_16
Sweden_19
AB115544_3BAF296165_3D
French_Donor_10
P_N001214902194
P_N001213909588P_N001213905698
P_N001213907674
AB248521_3eAB094250_3E
AB248520_3e
Germany_3AF503512_3E
AF455784_3GAF336296_3F
French_Donor_2French_Donor_22
French_Donor_14P_N001213906748
French_Donor_3P_N001212909755
French_Donor_6French_Donor_13
French_Donor_16P_N001213908730
P_N001213900814D_9575_Spaans
French_Donor_11P_N001212913572
French_Donor_1P_N001211904913NL_Patient_01
French_Donor_19French_Donor_7
D_N001111062446NL_Donor_01
D_N000312096110French_Donor_9
P_N001212911317P_N001212903842
D_N000312101329NL_Donor_14
P_N001214901379P_N001212905169NL_Patient_02
French_Donor_23
P_N001212907243French_Donor_20
Czech_23Sweden_15
Sweden_12P_N001213909941
Germany_18
Genotype 1Genotype 4
Genotype 2
England&Wales
GT3, group 2
England&Wales
GT3, group 1
3c
3e
3fCourtesy of S. Ijaz
Virology Division
log1
0 I
U/m
l
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
#8567/13
#8568/13s
#8569/13
#8570/13
#8571/13
#8572/13
#8573/13
#8574/13s
#8575/13
#8576/13
#8577/13
#8577/13s
Cand
idate
BRP
Range of Quantitative Assays Results (IU/ml)
Box indicates interquartile range; line within box indicates median; whiskers indicate minimum
and maximum values observed. Circles depict expected values measured at PEI.
1a 1a 1e 3b 3c 3e 3f R 4c 4g 2a 2a 3f
Virology Division
Calibration of the Candidate BRP (Secondary Standard)
23A 6E 8 6E
6F
11
20
6B
6F
8
13
1
2
10
15
17
23C
2
10
15
17
19A
6B
6D
13
19B
21B
21B
3A
4
16
18
21A
1
3A
4
6C
16
18
3B
5
11
19B
9
12
19A
6A
9
12
21A
22
3B
14
14
20
22
7
BRP candidate
La
bo
rato
rie
s
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
log10 IU/ml
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.8
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.6
5.8
6.0
6.2
6.4
6.6
Overall potency of BRP
potency is:
4.61 log10 IU/ml
(95% CI: 4.51 – 4.72)
Virology Division
Established by the WHO ECBS in October 2015
Genotypes generally well detected
Inevitable genetic changes – other studies; some sub-
genotypes (3) not always so consistently detected
No unitage assigned to the panel members (WHO policy)
Details of potencies (+ range) will be reported in IFU
Wide range (especially gt 1, gt 2)
Panel will be ready for distribution early 2016
BRP being reviewed the CoE BSP steering committee
International Reference Panel – HEV Genotypes
Virology Division
Jothikumar et al., A broadly reactive one-step real-time RT-PCR
assay for rapid and sensitive detection of hepatitis E virus. J Virol
Meth 131, 65-71
Targets a conserved region in ORF2/ORF3
Probe is very short, Tm ~10°C lower than normal
Database - small number of HEV strains with polymorphisms
Widely Used HEV Real-Time PCR – Issues
Virology Division
Garson et al., Minor groove binder modification of widely used
TaqMan probe for hepatitis E virus reduces risk of false-negative
real-time PCR results. J Virol Meth, 186, 157-60
Serologically confirmed hepatitis E cases reinvestigated using the
modified probe, identified additional HEV RNA positive samples
Probe 5´-TGA TTC TCA GCC CTT CGC
UK patient 5´-TGA TTC TCA GCC CTT TGC
MGB modification ↑ Tm of probe and restored detection
Polymorphism seen in UK patients, caucasians
Widely Used HEV Real-Time PCR – Issues Contd.
Virology Division
Analysis of plasma donors by the PEI in collaboration with
Octapharma has identified a further polymorphism
Probe 5´-TGA TTC TCA GCC CTT CGC
UK patient 5´-TGA TTC TCA GCC CTT TGC
Swedish donor 5´-TGA TTC CCA GCC CTT CGC
Widely Used HEV Real-Time PCR – Issues Contd.
WHO IS
HEV RNA positive
plasma donor
NTC
Virology Division
HEV NAT - Commercial Assays
Manufacturer Assay name Technology Notes
altona DIAGNOSTICS RealStar® HEV RT-PCR kit
1.0
Real-time PCR CE-mark* 95% cut-off;
Vollmer et al., JCM, 5 IU/ml
Corman et al., Vox, 260 IU/ml
Beijing Kinghawk
Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd
HEV RNA (FQ-PCR) Real-time PCR IVD
gt 1, 4
CEERAM S.A.S. (BioMerieux) hepatitisE@ceeramTool® Real-time PCR CE-mark*
Genome Diagnostics Pvt. Ltd Geno-Sen’s HEV Real Time
PCR Kit
Real-time PCR CE-mark*
95% cut-off – 80 cps/ml
Liferiver (Gentaur) HEV Real Time RT-PCR Kit
RNA
Real-time PCR CE-mark*
gt 4
Mediagnost GmbH HEVGene®-Detection kit PCR RUO
MIKROGEN GmbH ampliCUBE HEV Real-time PCR CE-mark*
PrimerDesign Ltd Path-HEV Real-time PCR RUO, <100 cps
Roche Molecular Systems Inc. cobas® HEV Real-time PCR CE-mark*,
95% cut-off - 18.6 IU/ml, gt 1-4
Hologic, Inc./Grifols Diagnostic
Solutions, Inc.
Procleix HEV assay TMA CE-mark*
95% cut-off - 7.89 IU/ml, gt 1-4
Fast Track Diagnostics FTD Hepatitis E RNA Real time PCR CE-mark* LOD 100 IU/ml
TIB Molbiol LightMix® Modular HEV Real time PCR CE-mark* LOD ~200 IU/ml, gt 1-4
*In compliance with Directive 98/79/EC on In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices (Annex III, manufacturer's self-declaration)
Virology Division
Hologic/Grifols – Panther
Roche - cobas® 6800/8800
Automated Platforms
Virology Division
Antigens
Peptides
Recombinant proteins – greater sensitivity
Mainly ORF2 capsid protein (occasionally ORF3); different gts
Assay format
EIAs – plates, blots, rapid (POC) tests
IgM, IgG, total Ig
In-house and commercially available assays
Assay performance
Issues of sensitivity, specificity (cross-reactivity e.g. CMV, EBV etc.)
Often poor concordance between assay results
Lot-to-lot variability
Differences in duration of persistence of abs to various epitopes
Detection of Anti-HEV
Virology Division
Seroprevalence (IgG) of HEV significantly underestimated
Bendall et al., J Med Virol 2010
Wantai vs. MP Biomedicals
16.2% vs. 3.6%, blood donors UK
Wenzel et al., J Infect Dis 2013
Wantai vs. MP Biomedicals
Healthcare workers Germany 29.5% vs. 4.5%
Revised assay formats suggests better concordance
Avellon et al., J Med Virol 2015
Issues of Sensitivity – IgG Assays
Virology Division
Wenzel et al., J Infect Dis 2013
MP Biomedicals Axiom (Wantai) Mikrogen
ELISA ELISA Immunoblot
Issues of Sensitivity – IgG Assays
Virology Division
Sensitivity/specificity issues
False reactivity (e.g. EBV, CMV)
Drobeniuc et al., Clin Inf Dis 2010
Certain tests perform better at low concentrations of IgM
Avellon et al., 2015
IgM Assays - Issues
Assay Sensitivity Specificity
I (Sar-55 Ag/Purcell) 98% 78%
II (Antigens aa 452-617 ORF2 gt1) 98% 93%
III (International Immunodiagnostics) 82% 91%
IV (MP Biomedicals) 72% 93%
V (Diagnostic Systems) 98% 95%
VI (Mikrogen) 92% 96%
Virology Division
A WHO International Reference Reagent (95/584) for anti-
HEV established in 1997
Ferguson et al. Biologicals 30:43-8.
Lyophilized, serum pool - 5 separate bleeds over a 45 day
period (4-5 months after onset of illness) from a US patient
who developed acute hepatitis after visiting India
No confirmation of HEV genotype (Saleem Kamili, pers. comm.)
Not established as an IS because the number of
participants in the collaborative study was too limited (n=7)
Anti-HEV IgG; IgM positive (Mikrogen recomWell, Eurimmun,
Wantai, MP Biomedicals)
Serology - Standardization
Virology Division
Bendall et al., J Med Virol 2010
Determination of Analytical Sensitivity –
WHO IRR 95/584
Virology Division
48th report of the ECBS (WHO Technical Report
Series 889)
“The Committee was aware that assays for anti-hepatitis E
were at an early stage of development and recognized that
full assessment of new antibody assays requires panels of
sera. Nevertheless, it felt that the availability of a common
reference material would help evaluate inter-laboratory
variation and would aid developments in the serology of
hepatitis E virus. The Committee therefore established the
preparation coded 95/584, as an interim Reference Reagent
for Anti-hepatitis E Serum, Human, and assigned a value of
50 units per ampoule.”
Anti-HEV IRR
Virology Division
WHO ECBS endorsed a proposal in Oct. 2015 to develop an
international reference panel for anti-HEV
Acute and convalescent samples
IgM (± IgG), IgG
Samples confirmed by PCR (confirmation of gt)
Wide geographic area
Large volume samples
Lyophilized (shipment)
Evaluation in an international collaborative study
Development of an Anti-HEV Reference Panel
Virology Division
PEI
Johannes Blümel
Kay-Martin Hanschmann
Roswitha Kleiber
Sigrid Nick
Micha Nübling (PEI/WHO)
Gudrun Winskowsky
Japan
Keiji Matsubayashi (JRCS)
Saeko Mizusawa (NIID)
EDQM
Eriko Terao
WHO
Collaborative Study Participants
Acknowledgements
Germany
Thoma Gärtner (Octapharma)
Cornelia Adlhoch (RKI, ECDC)
Marco Kaiser (RKI)
Victor Corman (Bonn)
Jürgen Wenzel (Regensburg)
UK
Harry Dalton
France
Anne-Marie Roque-Afonso
India
Rakesh Aggarwal (SGPIMS)
Nirupma Trehanpati (ILBS)
USA
Saleem Kamili (CDC)