Hawaii State Correctional Facility and Custody Status...

52
Hawaii State Correctional Facility and Custody Status Analysis (Final) FY 2011 Inmate Population Department of Public Safety Interagency Council on Intermediate Sanctions By: Timothy Wong, ICIS Research Analyst, Department of the Attorney General Maria Sadaya, Research Aide, State of Hawaii Judiciary September 1, 2011

Transcript of Hawaii State Correctional Facility and Custody Status...

Hawaii State Correctional Facility and Custody Status Analysis

(Final)

FY 2011 Inmate Population Department of Public Safety

Interagency Council on Intermediate Sanctions

By:

Timothy Wong, ICIS Research Analyst, Department of the Attorney General

Maria Sadaya, Research Aide, State of Hawaii Judiciary

September 1, 2011

Methodology� The data comes from 5,921 incarcerated offenders currently in custody at nine correctional facilities,

including two mainland-based corrections centers.

� Five custody statuses reported in this study.

� 3,931 (66.4%) LSI-R and ASUS compiled from the July, 2010 CYZAP download.

� Initial LSI-R and ASUS assessments used in this analysis.

� Separate tables compiled by correctional facilities and custody status.� Data analyzed by sociodemographics, and cross-tabulated by ASUS scales, LSI-R Subdomains, and Officer

Rater Evaluations.

� Correctional facilities and custody status analyzed by risk rankings in the following statistically significant areas:

� ASUS scales

� LSI-R subdomains

� ASUS officer rater evaluations

Business Rules� Used only statistically significant data.

� Used only High and Surveillance to report LSI-R Risk Categories.

� Eliminated “Out of State” (OOS) data from any Correctional Facility analysis.

� Eliminated “Offender Held” data from any Custody Status analysis.

� Used only Residential Treatment, Therapeutic Community, and Assess for Psychopathy to report Recommended Treatment Level Risk rankings.

Summary of Findings -

Listing of Highest Ranked Indicators of Risk from the Initial LSI-R and

ASUS Assessments, by Correctional Facility� Women’s Community Correctional Facility

� 26.5 LSI-R Total Score - classification: high risk (LSI-R) � 63rd percentile with Financial need (LSI-R)� 59th percentile with Criminal History (LSI-R)� 48th percentile with Family or Marital need (LSI-R)� 43rd percentile with Accommodation need (LSI-R)� 58th percentile with Alcohol or Drug Disruption (ASUS)� 59th percentile with Alcohol or Drug Related Mood disorder (ASUS)� 16.6% of inmates had Prior Mental Health Treatment - two or more times (ASUS) � 12.0% had prior Alcohol or Drug Education classes - two or more times (ASUS)

� Waiawa Correctional Center� 92.2% of inmates are Sentenced Felons (PSD)� 58th percentile with Pro Criminal Companions (LSI-R)� 49th percentile with Alcohol or Drug need (LSI-R)� 49th percentile with Emotional/Personal need (LSI-R)� 60th percentile with Alcohol or Drug Involvement (ASUS) � 40.2% of inmates had Alcohol or Drug Related Arrests - two or more times (ASUS)

� Kauai Community Correctional Center� 57th percentile with Alcohol or Drug Involvement over Pass Six Months (ASUS)� 24.7% of inmates had Very High rated Alcohol or Drug Involvement - Officer Evaluation (ASUS)� 24.7% of inmates had Very High rated Alcohol or Drug Disruption - Officer Evaluation (ASUS)� 12.3% of inmates had Prior Outpatient Treatment - two or more times (ASUS)� 36.1% of inmates are under 30 years old (LSI-R)

� Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center� 78th percentile with Leisure/Recreation need (LSI-R)� 62nd percentile with Educational/Employment need (LSI-R)� 30th percentile with Anti Social Attitudes/Orientation (LSI-R)� 76.2% of inmates were unemployed - 3+months (ASUS)� 26.9% of inmates need at least residential substance use services or greater, based on the Recommended Treatment Level (LSI-R/ASUS)

� Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center� 28.9% of inmates convicted for Felony Violent offense (LSI-R)� 72.2% of inmates are at least single, divorced, or separated (LSI-R)

Note: Source of data is in parenthesis.

Summary of Findings (cont.) -

Listing of Highest Ranked Indicators of Risk from Initial LSI-R and ASUS

Assessments, by Custody Status

� Probation Violation� 24.7 LSI-R Total Score – Classified: medium risk (LSI-R)� 75th percentile with Leisure/Recreation need (LSI-R)� 52nd percentile (tie) with Financial need (LSI-R)� 47th percentile with Alcohol or Drug need (LSI-R)� 27th percentile with Anti Social Attitudes/Orientation (LSI-R)� 67.2% of inmates were unemployed - 3+months (ASUS)� 51st percentile with Alcohol or Drug Related Mood disorder (ASUS)� 38.0% of inmates are under 30 years old (LSI-R)

� Pre Trial/Pre Sentence� 57th percentile with Educational/Employment need (LSI-R)� 52nd percentile (tie) with Financial need (LSI-R)� 41st percentile in Family or Marital need (LSI-R)

� Parole Violation� 32.3% of inmates incarcerated for felony violent offenses (LSI-R)� 59th percentile in Criminal History (LSI-R)� 57th percentile with pro criminal Companions (LSI-R)

� Sentenced Felon� 37th percentile with Accommodation need (LSI-R)

� Sentenced Petty Misdemeanants and Misdemeanants� 29th percentile with Emotional/Personal need (LSI-R)

Note: Source of data is in parenthesis.

Hawaii Community

Correctional Center,

534, 9.0%Halawa Correctional

Facility, 983, 16.6%

Arizona Saguaro

Correctional Center,

1,699, 28.7%

Arizona Red Rock

Correctional Center, 58,

1.0%

Waiawa Correctional

Facility, 295, 5.0%

Women's Community

Correctional Center,

308, 5.2%

Maui Community

Correctional Center,

370, 6.3%

Kauai Community

Correctional Center,

161, 2.7%

Oahu Community

Correctional Center,

1,512, 25.5%

Chart 1: Proportion of

Inmates Incarcerated, by

Correctional Facilities

Sentenced Felon, 3,896,

65.8%

Probation Violation, 267,

4.5%

Pretrial/Resentenced,

893, 15.1%

Offender Held, 13, 0.2%

Sentenced

Petty/Misdemeanants,

238, 4.0%

Parole Violation, 614,

10.4%

Chart 2: Proportion of Inmates Incarcerated, by Custody Status

Chart 3: Proportion of

Inmates Incarcerated, by

Gender

Female, 444, 11.3%

Male, 3,489, 88.7%

All Others/Unknown,

724, 18.4%

Pacific Islander, 239,

6.1%

Filipino, 298, 7.6%

Japanese (No Mix),

89, 2.3%

Samoan (No Mix),

157, 4.0%

Asian, 97, 2.5%

African American,

138, 3.5%

Caucasian (No Mix),

539, 13.7%

Hawaiian/Pt. Hawn,

1,652, 42.0%

Chart 4: Proportion of Inmates Incarcerated, by Ethnicity

Divorced, 521, 13.2%

Married, 438, 11.1%

Separated, 185, 4.7%

Single- Never

Married, 2,757, 70.1%

Widowed, 32, 0.8%

Chart 5: Proportion of

Inmates Incarcerated, by

Marital Status

20-29 yrs old, 954,

26.7%

30-39 yrs old, 1,157,

32.3%

40-49 yrs old, 945,

26.4%

50-59 yrs old, 404,

11.3%

70+ yrs old, 8, 0.2%60-69 yrs old, 57, 1.6%

<20 yrs old, 54, 1.5%

Chart 6: Proportion of Inmates Incarcerated, by Age Range

Less than High

School, 1,529, 45.3%

High School

Graduate, 1,578,

46.7%

Post High School,

271, 8.0%

Chart 7: Proportion of

Inmates Incarcerated, by

Educational Level

Employed, 980, 29.4%

Unemployed 1-3

months, 325, 9.8%

Student, 20, 0.6%

Unemployed 3+

months, 2,006, 60.2%

Chart 8: Proportion of Inmates Incarcerated, by

Unemployed Status

Felony Violent,

797, 21.8%

Felony Sex, 313,

8.6%

Felony Property,

1,030, 28.1%

Felony Drug, 935,

25.6%

Felony Other, 309,

8.4%

Misdemeanor/

Other, 275, 7.5%

Chart 9: Proportion of

Inmates Incarcerated, by

Type of Offense

Oahu, 2,770, 70.4%

Hawaii, 471, 12.0%Maui, 515, 13.1%

Kauai, 176, 4.5%

Chart 10: Proportion of Assessments Conducted, by County

Correctional Facility

Analysis

Cross-tabulated by…

•Demographics

•ASUS Scale

• LSI-R

• ASUS Rater Evaluation

Demographics by

Correctional Facility

Correctional Facilities Initial Assessment Risk Rankings, by Selected

At-Risk Indicators

The table above represents facility risk rankings from 1 thru 9, based on the highest to lowest proportion of offenders for each of the specified “at risk” indicators. The Highest Average Rank is the correctional facility with the highest average risk-rankings across the five indicators.

Correctional facilities that have the same risk-rank scores receive the same Average Rank (prefaced by a “tied” remark).

997386

Maui Community

Correctional Center

839928

Women's Community

Correctional Center

766494

Hawaii Community

Correctional Center

653757

Halawa Correctional

Facility

578163

Kauai Community

Correctional Center

415845

Waiawa Correctional

Facility

1 (tied)84232

Oahu Community

Correctional Center

1 (tied)41671

Arizona Saguaro

Correctional Center

1 (tied)22519

Arizona Red Rock

Correctional Center

Highest Average

Rank

Sentenced Felon

Felony Violent Convictions

<30 yrs old

Unemployment (>3 months)

Marital Status-Single Never

Married

Correctional Facility

Chi-Sq (3,933) = 47.61, p < .05

Percent Marital

Status (State Average)

Chart 11: Percent Marital

Status (Single Never

Married), by Correctional Facilities

63.0%

66.4%

67.0%

68.1%

69.1%

70.2%

70.6%

71.8%

72.2%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Maui Community Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

51.6%

52.4%

58.1%

59.5%

60.2%

63.3%

64.1%

67.5%

76.2%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional Center

Arizona Red Rock Correctional CenterChart 12: Percent Unemployment

(Unemployed 3+ months), by Correctional Facilities

Chi-Sq (3,331) = 42.75, p < .05

Percent

Employment (State Average)

Chi-Sq (3,5791) = 94.40, p < .001

Percent Age Range

(State Average)

Chart 13: Percent Age

Range (Inmates <30 years

old), by Correctional Facilities

22.7%

22.9%

24.5%

27.1%

28.6%

29.8%

31.4%

33.4%

35.1%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Women's Community Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Halawa Correctional Facility

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Chart 14: Percent Type of Offense (Felony Violent), by Correctional

Facilities

Chi-Sq (3,659) = 4.12E, p < .001

Percent Type of

Offense (State Average)

12.1%

12.3%

13.2%

16.0%

17.2%

17.3%

25.3%

28.0%

28.9%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Women's Community Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Chart 15: Percent Offenders Whose Custody Status

are Sentenced Felons, by Correctional Facilities

Chi-Sq (5,921) = 2.75E, p < .001Percent Sentenced Felons (State Average)

30.3%

43.3%

48.8%

53.7%

76.9%

83.5%

86.0%

89.7%

92.2%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Maui Community Correctional Center

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional Center

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Note: Although all incarcerated offenders are presumed Sentenced felons, the custody status of some offenders do vary from pre-trial felons to sentenced misdemeanants.

ASUS Scale by

Correctional Facility

Correctional Facilities Risk Rankings, by Initial ASUS

Assessment Percentile Scales

*Recommended Treatment Level combines the proportion of offenders in Residential Treatment, Therapeutic Community, and Assessment for Psychopathy levels.

987788

Halawa Correctional

Facility

818999

Arizona Red Rock

Correctional Center

774677

Oahu Community

Correctional Center

666556

Arizona Saguaro

Correctional Center

525865

Maui Community

Correctional Center

439344

Hawaii Community

Correctional Center

391223

Kauai Community

Correctional Center

243431

Waiawa Correctional

Facility

152112

Women's Community

Correctional Center

Highest Average

Rank

Recommended Treatment

Level*

% Six Months

% Mood% Disruption% InvolvementCorrectional Facility

Note: The table above represents facility risk rankings from 1 thru 9, based on the highest to lowest percentiles of offenders for each of the specified “at risk” indicators. The Highest Average Rank is the correctional facility with the highest average risk-rankings across five ASUS scales. Computed Risk Rankings are from statistically significant ASUS scales only.

Differences in correctional facilities for Social, Global, Defensive, and Motivation scales are not statistically significant, and subsequently not reported.

F(3,296) = 4.37, p < .001 Total ASUS Score

(State Average)

Chart 16: Average ASUS Scores

from Initial ASUS Assessments,

by Correctional Facilities

44.9

48.9

50.4

50.4

52.0

52.5

54.4

55.6

61.6

0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Maui Community Correctional Center

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional Center

45.8%

48.9%

51.5%

52.9%

53.4%

55.6%

57.1%

57.7%

59.9%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional FacilityChart 17: Average

Involvement

Percentiles from Initial ASUS Assessments, by Correctional Facilities

F(3,852) = 5.49, p < .001

Percent

Involvement (State Average)

43.2%

47.8%

48.7%

49.5%

50.8%

52.1%

53.2%

53.4%

57.8%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional CenterChart 18: Average Disruption Percentiles from Initial ASUS

Assessments, by Correctional Facilities

F(3,854) = 4.09, p < .001

Percent Disruption

(State Average)

F(3,854) = 4.21, p < .001

Percent Mood

(State Average)

Chart 19: Average Mood

Percentiles from Initial

ASUS Assessments, by Correctional Facilities

47.1%

48.2%

48.3%

49.5%

49.9%

50.2%

52.9%

57.1%

58.8%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional Center

25.1%

39.1%

45.0%

47.1%

50.6%

51.5%

52.1%

53.3%

56.7%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Women's Community Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional CenterChart 20: Average Six Months Involvement Percentiles from Initial

ASUS Assessments, by Correctional Facilities

F(3,852) = 6.94, p < .001

Percent Six Month

(State Average)

Chart 21: Percent Recommended Treatment Levels from

Initial ASUS Assessments, by Correctional Facilities

Chi-Sq (3,855) = 1.08E, p < .001Percent Residential Treatment (State Average)

Percent Therapeutic Community (State Average)

Percent Assess for Psychopathy (State Average)

9.4%

11.8%

12.0%

12.9%

14.2%

14.5%

15.2%

15.4%

25.9%

7.1%

4.7%

4.8%

5.4%

10.4%

4.8%

7.8%

4.7%

0.0%

2.4%

1.1%

1.3%

1.8%

4.7%

1.1%

0.4%

0.4%

0.0%

0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0%

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Residential Treatment Therapeutic Community Assess for Psychopathy

LSI-R by

Correctional Facility

� Criminal History (CH)

� Education/Employment (E/E)

� Financial (FIN)

� Family/Marital (F/M)

� Accommodations (ACC)

� Leisure/Recreation (L/R)

� Companions (COM)

� Alcohol/Drugs (AOD)

� Emotion/Personal (E/P)

� Attitudes/Orientation (A/O)

� LSI-R Risk Categories High and Surveillance only (LSI-R)

KEY:

999888998895Hawaii Community Correctional Center

887559753279Kauai Community Correctional Center

762775467766Halawa Correctional Facility

676446685348Oahu Community Correctional Center

548332874687Maui Community Correctional Center

433663546934Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

321997122412Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

254111239553Waiawa Correctional Facility

115224311121Women's Community Correctional Center

Highest Average

Rank

LSI-R Total Score

A/OE/PAODCOML/RACCF/MFINE/ECHCorrectional Facility

Correctional Facilities Risk Rankings, by Initial LSI-R Assessment Sub Domains

Note: The table above represents facility risk rankings from 1 thru 9, based on the highest to lowest percentiles of offenders for each of the specified “at risk” indicators. The Highest Average Rank is the correctional facility with the highest average risk-rankings across ten LSI-R subdomains and Total Score. Computed Risk Rankings are from statistically significant LSI-R subdomains and Total Score only.

F(3,931) = 4.81, p < .001 Total LSI Score

(State Average)

Chart 22: Average Total LSI-R Scores from Initial

LSI-R Assessments, by Correctional Facilities

22.5

23.5

23.9

24.2

24.2

24.7

24.9

25.6

26.5

0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional CenterHigh Risk based on LSI-R Risk Levels

Medium Risk based on LSI-R Risk Levels

F(3,931) = 6.08, p < .001

Percent Criminal

History (State Average)

Chart 23: Average

Criminal History

Percentiles from LSI-R Initial Assessments, by Correctional Facilities

46.7%

48.1%

51.1%

52.6%

52.9%

54.3%

54.4%

55.2%

59.0%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional Center

48.9%

50.5%

53.5%

53.8%

54.4%

55.8%

58.0%

59.0%

62.2%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional Center

Arizona Red Rock Correctional CenterChart 24: Average Educational/Employ-ment Percentiles from

LSI-R Initial Assessments, by Correctional Facilities

F(3,931) = 5.53, p < .001

Total LSI Score

(State Average)

F(3,931) = 12.08, p < .001

Percent Financial

(State Average)

Chart 25: Average

Financial Percentiles

from Initial LSI-R Assessments, by Correctional Facilities

38.0%

42.0%

42.0%

43.0%

43.0%

44.0%

47.0%

51.0%

63.0%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Maui Community Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional Center

32.8%

36.9%

36.9%

38.0%

38.5%

38.7%

43.8%

45.4%

47.6%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional CenterChart 26: Average Family/Marital Percentiles from Initial

LSI-R Assessments, by Correctional Facilities

F(3,931) = 5.92, p < .001

Percent

Family/Marital (State Average)

F(3,931) = 4.43, p < .001

Percent

Accommodation (State Average)

Chart 27: Average

Accommodation

Percentiles from Initial LSI-R Assessments, by Correctional Facilities

30.0%

33.0%

35.0%

36.0%

36.0%

38.0%

38.0%

41.0%

43.0%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional Center

62.0%

67.0%

69.0%

72.0%

73.0%

73.0%

74.0%

74.0%

78.0%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Women's Community Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Arizona Red Rock Correctional CenterChart 28: Average Leisure/Recreation Percentiles from Initial

LSI-R Assessments, by Correctional Facilities

F(3,931) = 3.07, p < .01

Percent

Leisure/Recreation (State Average)

F(3,931) = 9.22, p < .001

Percent

Companions (State Average)

Chart 29: Average

Companions Percentiles

from Initial LSI-R Assessments, by Correctional Facilities

46.6%

50.3%

51.1%

51.2%

55.3%

57.1%

58.7%

61.4%

58.1%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Women's Community Correctional Center

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

33.0%

39.0%

40.0%

42.0%

43.0%

43.0%

45.0%

46.0%

49.0%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional FacilityChart 30: Average Alcohol/Drug Problem Percentiles from Initial

LSI-R Assessments, by Correctional Facilities

F(3,923) = 5.68, p < .001

Percent Alcohol/

Drug Problem (State Average)

F(3,931) = 10.11, p < .001

Percent

Emotional/Personal (State Average)

Chart 31: Average

Emotional Percentiles

from Initial LSI-R Assessments, Personal, by Correctional Facilities

33.0%

39.0%

40.0%

42.0%

43.0%

43.0%

45.0%

46.0%

49.0%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

19.0%

19.0%

24.0%

25.0%

25.0%

25.0%

26.0%

27.0%

30.0%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Arizona Red Rock Correctional CenterChart 32: Average Attitudes/Orientation Percentiles from

Initial LSI-R Assessments, by Correctional

Facilities

F(3,931) = 2.73, p < .01

Percent Attitudes/

Orientation (State Average)

Chi-Sq (3,931) = 87.67, p < .001

Percent High and

Surveillance (State Average)

Chart 33: Percent LSI-R Risk Categories from Initial

LSI-R Assessments, by Correctional Facilities

Percent High (State

Average)Note: Surveillance State Average = 7.6%

32.2%

31.8%

35.7%

37.5%

39.7%

40.8%

43.0%

33.3%

42.4%

5.0%

5.9%

7.2%

8.8%

6.6%

6.3%

7.0%

18.5%

13.8%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Maui Community Correctional Center

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional Center

High Surveillance

Total (56.2%)

Total (51.8%)

Total (50.0%)

Total (47.1%)

Total (46.3%)

Total (46.3%)

Total (42.9%)

Total (37.7%)

Total (37.2%)

ASUS Rater Evaluation

by Correctional Facility

9954998Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

8892746

Oahu Community

Correctional Center

7445689

Maui Community

Correctional Center

6387835

Arizona Saguaro

Correctional Center

5673557

Halawa Correctional

Facility

4536473

Hawaii Community

Correctional Center

3168362

Waiawa Correctional

Facility

2711224

Women's

Community

Correctional Center

1229111

Kauai Community

Correctional Center

Highest

Average Rank

AOD

Arrests (2+ Only)

Prior AOD

Edu Class (2+ Only)

Prior MH Tx(2+ Only)

Prior OP Tx(2+ Only)

AOD Disrupt

(Very High Only)

AOD Use

Involve (Very High Only)

Correctional Facility

Correctional Facilities Risk Rankings, by Selected Alcohol and Drug

Addiction (AOD) Indicators (from Initial ASUS Assessment Rater Evaluations)

Note: The table above represents facility risk rankings from 1 thru 9, based on the highest to lowest proportion of offenders for each of the specified “at risk” indicators. The Highest Average Rank is the correctional facility with the highest average risk-rankings across six ASUS Rater Recommended indicators.

Chi-Sq (3,839) = 1.59E, p < .001

Percent AOD Use

Involvement (State Average)

Chart 34: Average

Proportions of Very

High Alcohol or Drug Use Involvement, from Initial ASUS Assessment Rater

Evaluations, by Correctional Facilities

7.3%

7.4%

7.7%

8.0%

8.5%

9.5%

10.0%

10.8%

24.7%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Maui Community Correctional Center

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional Center

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Kauai Community Correctional Center

3.7%

6.0%

7.0%

7.4%

8.5%

8.5%

8.6%

12.8%

24.7%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Halawa Correctional Facility

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional CenterChart 35: Average Proportions of Very High Alcohol or Drug

Use Disruption, from Initial ASUS Assessment Rater

Evaluations, by Correctional Facilities

Chi-Sq (3,839) = 1.20E, p < .001

Percent AOD Use

Disruption (State Average)

Chart 34

Chart 35

Chi-Sq (3,367) = 63.56, p < .001

Percent Prior

Outpatient Treatment (State Average)

Chart 36: Average

Proportions of (two or

more) Prior Outpatient Treatment from, Initial ASUS Assessment Rater Evaluations (2+ Only), by Correctional Facilities

0.0%

4.7%

5.7%

6.0%

7.5%

7.8%

9.5%

10.0%

12.3%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Women's Community Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

3.8%

6.0%

7.2%

7.7%

8.0%

8.7%

11.2%

11.7%

16.6%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional CenterChart 37: Average Proportions of (two or more) Prior Mental

Health Treatment, from Initial ASUS Assessment Rater

Evaluations, by Correctional Facilities

Chi-Sq (3,224) = 51.51, p < .001

Percent Prior

Mental Health Treatment (State Average)

Chart 36

Chart 37

Chi-Sq (3,220) = 41.04, p < .01

Percent Prior Drug

and Alcohol Education Classes (State Average)

Chart 38: Average

Proportions of (two or

more) Prior Drug and Alcohol Education Classes, from Initial ASUS Assessment Rater Evaluations, by Correctional Facilities

5.4%

6.7%

7.3%

7.7%

8.0%

9.5%

9.7%

11.4%

12.0%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Waiawa Correctional Facility

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional Center

12.0%

28.1%

29.4%

30.1%

30.8%

31.2%

31.5%

33.8%

40.2%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Arizona Red Rock Correctional Center

Oahu Community Correctional Center

Women's Community Correctional Center

Halawa Correctional Facility

Hawaii Community Correctional Center

Maui Community Correctional Center

Arizona Saguaro Correctional Center

Kauai Community Correctional Center

Waiawa Correctional FacilityChart 39: Average Proportions of (two or more) Alcohol or Drug

Related Arrests, from Initial ASUS Assessment Rater

Evaluations, by Correctional Facilities

Chi-Sq (3,311) = 29.01, p < .05

Percent of Alcohol

or Drug Related Arrests (State Average)

Chart 38

Chart 39

Custody Status Analysis

• Demographics

• ASUS Scale

• LSI-R

Demographics by

Custody Status

5552Sentenced Petty/Misdemeanants

4145Parole Violation

3333Pretrial/Pre-Sentenced

2224Sentenced Felon

1411Probation Violation

Highest

Average Rank

Felony Violent

Conviction

Unemployment

(>3 months)

Age Range

(<30 yrs old)Custody Status

Custody Status Risk Rankings, by Average Demographic Indicators (from Initial ASUS Assessment Rater Evaluations)

The table above represents custody status rankings from 1 thru 9, based on the highest to lowest proportion of offenders

for each of the specified “at risk” indicators. The Highest Average Rank is the custody status with the lowest combined

rankings, which represent the severest, average risk-rankings across the five indicators. The custody statuses that have

the same risk-rank scores receive the same Average Rank (prefaced by a “tied” remark).

Chart 40: Average

Proportion of

Incarcerated Offenders, by Gender and Custody Status

Chi Sq.(3,933) = 14.26, p < .05

Percent Female by

Custody Status

(State Average)

Percent Male by

Custody Status

(State Average)

17.5%

12.7%

11.2%

11.0%

8.4%

82.5%

87.3%

88.8%

89.0%

91.6%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Probation Violation

Pretrial/Pre-Sentenced

Sentenced Felon

Sentenced Petty/Misdemeanants

Parole Violation

Female Male

14.3%

29.0%

33.4%

37.2%

38.0%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Parole Violation

Sentenced Felon

Pretrial/Pre-

Sentenced

Sentenced

Petty/Misdemeanants

Probation ViolationChart 41: Average Proportion of Incarcerated

Offenders, by Age Range (Inmates <30 yrs old) and Custody Status

Chi Sq.(3,579) = 1.08E,

p < .001

Percent Age Range

by Custody Status

(State Average)

Chart 42: Average

Proportion of Incarcerated

Offenders, by Unemployment (Unemployed 3+ months) and Custody Status

Chi Sq.(3,331) = 59.26, p < .001

Percent

Employment by

Custody Status

(State Average)44.7%

46.9%

61.5%

62.4%

67.2%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Sentenced

Petty/Misdemeanants

Parole Violation

Pretrial/Pre-

Sentenced

Sentenced Felon

Probation Violation

9.9%

11.0%

13.7%

22.1%

32.3%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Sentenced

Petty/Misdemeanants

Probation Violation

Pretrial/Pre-

Sentenced

Sentenced Felon

Parole Violation

Chart 43: Average Proportion of Incarcerated offenders, by Type of

Offense (Felony Violent) and Custody Status

Chi Sq.(3,659) = 4.62E, p < .001

Percent Type of

Offense by Custody

Status (State

Average)

Chart 42

Chart 43

ASUS Scale by Custody

Status

5544Sentenced Petty/Misdemeanants

4433Pretrial/Pre-Sentenced

3252Sentenced Felon

2115Parole Violation

1321Probation Violation

Highest

Average Rank% Motivation% Defensive% MoodCustody Status

Note: The table above represents custody status risk rankings from 1 thru 9, based on the highest to lowest percentiles of offenders for each of the specified “at risk” indicators. The Highest Average Rank is the custody status with the lowest combined rankings, which represent the severest average risk-rankings across five ASUS scales. Custody statuses that have the same combined risk-rankings receive the same Average Rank (prefaced by a “tied” remark). Computed Risk Rankings are from statistically significant ASUS scales only.

Differences in correctional facilities for Disruption, Involvement, Social, and Global scales are not statistically significant, and subsequently not reported.

*Recommended Treatment Level represents the combined proportion of offenders at Residential Treatment, Therapeutic Community, and Assessment for Psychopathy levels.

Custody Status Risk Rankings, by ASUS Risk Indicators (from Initial ASUS Assessments)

Chart 44: Average Mood

Percentiles from Initial

ASUS Assessments, by Custody Status

F(3,854) = 2.99, p < .05

Percent Mood by

Custody Status

(State Average)

45.9%

48.9%

50.1%

51.0%

51.1%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Parole Violation

Sentenced

Petty/Misdemeanants

Pretrial/Pre-

Sentenced

Sentenced Felon

Probation Violation

60.0%

60.6%

60.8%

61.6%

64.5%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Sentenced Felon

Sentenced

Petty/Misdemeanants

Pretrial/Pre-

Sentenced

Probation Violation

Parole ViolationChart 45: Average Defensive Percentiles,

from Initial ASUS Assessments, by Custody Status

F(3,854) = 2.62, p < .05

Percent

Defensive by

Custody Status

(State Average)

Chart 44

Chart 45

Chart 46: Average Motivation Percentiles from

Initial ASUS Assessments, by Custody Status

F(3,854)

=

2.99,

p

<

.05

F(3,854)

=

2.99,

p

<

.05

F(3,852) = 6.90, p < .01 Percent Motivation by Custody

Status (State Average)

52.1%

55.5%

55.8%

61.6%

66.0%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Sentenced

Petty/Misdemeanants

Pretrial/Pre-

Sentenced

Probation Violation

Sentenced Felon

Parole Violation

LSI-R by Custody Status

555155452352

Sentenced Petty/

Misdemeanants

443541535541Parole Violation

3343343411 (tie)14

Pretrial/

Pre-Sentenced

222422214423Sentenced Felon

1112131231 (tie)35Probation Violation

Highest

Average Rank

LSI-RA/OE/PAODCOML/RACCF/MFINE/ECHCustody Status

Custody Status Risk Rankings, by LSI-R Sub domains (from Initial LSI-R Assessments)

� Criminal History (CH)

� Education/Employment (E/E)

� Financial (FIN)

� Family/Marital (F/M)

� Accommodations (ACC)

� Leisure/Recreation (L/R)

� Companions (COM)

� Alcohol/Drugs (AOD)

� Emotion/Personal (E/P)

� Attitudes/Orientation (A/O)

� LSI-R Risk Categories High and Surveillance only (LSI-R)

KEY:

Note: The table above represents custody status risk rankings from 1 thru 9, based on the highest to lowest percentiles of

offenders for each of the specified “at risk” indicators. The Highest Average Rank is the custody status with the lowest

combined rankings, which represent the severest average risk-rankings across ten LSI-R subdomains and total score.

Custody Statuses that have the same risk-ranks receive the same Average Rank (prefaced by a “tied” remark). Computed

Risk Rankings are from statistically significant LSI-R subdomains and total score only.

Chart 47: Average Total LSI-R Score from

Initial LSI-R Assessments, by Custody Status

F(3,854)

=

2.99,

p

<

.05

F(3,854)

=

2.99,

p

<

.05

F(3,931) = 3.59, p < .01 Total LSI Score by Custody

Status (State Average)

22.9

23.1

24.4

24.6

24.7

0 20 40 60 80 100

Sentenced

Petty/Misdemeanants

Parole Violation

Pretrial/Pre-

Sentenced

Sentenced Felon

Probation Violation

Chart 48: Average

Criminal History

Percentiles from Initial LSI-R Assessments, by Custody Status

F(3,931) = 9.34, p < .001

Percent Criminal

History by

Custody Status

(State Average)44.7%

51.1%

51.5%

53.2%

56.9%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Probation Violation

Pretrial/Pre-

Sentenced

Sentenced Felon

Sentenced

Petty/Misdemeanants

Parole Violation

49.0%

49.7%

55.9%

56.4%

57.0%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Sentenced

Petty/Misdemeanants

Parole Violation

Probation Violation

Sentenced Felon

Pretrial/Pre-

Sentenced

Chart 49: Average Education/ Employment Percentiles from Initial

LSI-R Assessments, by Custody Status

F(3,931) = 7.08, p < .001

Percent Education/

Employment by

Custody Status

(State Average)

Chart 48

Chart 49

Chart 50: Average

Financial Percentiles

from Initial LSI-R Assessments, by Custody Status

F(3,931) = 8.07, p < .001

Percent Financial

by Custody Status

(State Average)

38.0%

42.0%

45.0%

52.0%

52.0%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Parole Violation

Sentenced Felon

Sentenced

Petty/Misdemeanants

Probation Violation

Pretrial/Pre-

Sentenced

33.1%

37.4%

40.2%

40.3%

40.8%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Parole Violation

Sentenced Felon

Probation Violation

Sentenced

Petty/Misdemeanants

Pretrial/Pre-

Sentenced

Chart 51: Average Family/Marital Percentiles, from Initial

LSI-R Assessments, by Custody Status

F(3,931) = 3.72, p < .01

Percent

Family/Marital

by Custody

Status (State

Average)

Chart 50

Chart 51

Chart 52: Average

Accommodation

Percentiles, from Initial LSI-R Assessments, by Custody Status

F(3,931) = 4.88, p < .001

Percent

Accommodation

by Custody

Status (State

Average)27.0%

30.0%

34.0%

35.0%

37.0%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Sentenced

Petty/Misdemeanants

Pretrial/Pre-

Sentenced

Parole Violation

Probation Violation

Sentenced Felon

62.0%

68.0%

71.0%

74.0%

75.0%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Parole Violation

Sentenced

Petty/Misdemeanants

Pretrial/Pre-

Sentenced

Sentenced Felon

Probation Violation

Chart 53: Average Leisure/Recreation Percentiles, from Initial

LSI-R Assessments, by Custody Status

F(3,931) = 8.51, p < .001

Percent Leisure/

Recreation by

Custody Status

(State Average)

Chart 52

Chart 53

Chart 54: Average

Companions

Percentiles, from Initial LSI-R Assessments, by Custody Status

F(3,931) = 3.61, p < .01

Percent

Companions by

Custody Status

(State Average)

47.6%

52.5%

53.6%

56.0%

56.5%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Sentenced

Petty/Misdemeanants

Pretrial/Pre-

Sentenced

Probation Violation

Sentenced Felon

Parole Violation

37.0%

38.0%

42.0%

43.0%

47.0%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Sentenced

Petty/Misdemeanants

Parole Violation

Pretrial/Pre-

Sentenced

Sentenced Felon

Probation Violation

Chart 55: Average Alcohol/Drug Problem Percentiles, from Initial

LSI-R Assessments, by Custody Status

F(3,931) = 6.05, p < .001

Percent

Alcohol/Drug

Problem by

Custody Status

(State Average)

Chart 54

Chart 55

Chart 56: Average

Emotional/ Personal

Percentiles, from Initial LSI-R Assessments, by Custody Status

F(3,931) = 6.37, p < .001

Percent

Emotional/Personal

by Custody Status

(State Average)

18.6%

23.0%

25.8%

29.0%

29.2%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Parole Violation

Sentenced Felon

Pretrial/Pre-

Sentenced

Probation Violation

Sentenced

Petty/Misdemeanants

21.0%

23.0%

23.0%

25.0%

27.0%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Sentenced

Petty/Misdemeanants

Pretrial/Pre-

Sentenced

Parole Violation

Sentenced Felon

Probation Violation

Chart 57: Average Attitudes /Orientation Percentiles, from Initial

LSI-R Assessments, by Custody Status

Not Significant

Percent

Attitudes/

Orientation by

Custody Status

(State Average)

Chart 56

Chart 57