HASE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 1187 … planning/da-120908... · 2019-07-22 · 1187...

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx

XCG File No.: 5-1964-01-02 August 1, 2017

PHASE I

ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 1187 BURNHAMTHORPE ROAD EAST

OAKVILLE, ONTARIO

Prepared for: ONTARIO ZOROASTRIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

c/o Korsiak Urban Planning Attention: Ms. Constance Ratelle, MPlan, RPP

206-277 Lakeshore Road East Oakville, Ontario L6J 1H9

Andrea DAmour, B.Sc.E. Project Specialist

D. Grant Walsom, B.A.Sc., P.Eng., QP Partner

1187 Burnhamthorpe Road East, Oakville, Ontario

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx E1

ES 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As requested by the Ontario Zoroastrian Community Foundation (OZCF), XCG Consulting Limited (XCG) conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), at the property and buildings located at 1187 Burnhamthorpe Road East, in Oakville, Ontario (subject property or site). XCG completed a Phase I ESA for the property when acquired in 2005. It is XCGs understanding that OZCF is now proceeding with development of the property as a place of worship and requires an updated Phase I ESA.

The subject site consists of two buildings comprising a total of approximately 453 square metres (4,876 square feet) located on a 4.08-hectare (10.07-acre) parcel of land in the north end of the town. The subject site is currently used by OCZF as a place of congregation and worship. Since XCGs 2005 ESA, the garage has been converted and expanded into a congregation hall, with a new fire pond and associated hydrant, a new septic system, and an additional well and associated concrete cistern.

The purpose of the Phase I ESA was to identify, through a non-intrusive investigation, the existence of any actual or potential sources of significant contamination associated with subject property. Based on XCGs understanding of OZCFs environmental risk tolerance, significant contamination means environmental site impairment issues that would affect the ongoing and planned future use of the property for congregation and worshipping purposes.

The Phase I ESA was conducted in general accordance with Canadian Standards Association (CSA) Standard Z768-01 (Phase I Standard) for conducting ESAs. The Phase I ESA included a review of historical records, a subject site visit, interviews with persons knowledgeable about historic and current subject site operations, document reviews, and inquiries with regulatory agencies.

Based on the results of the Phase I ESA, including the site visit, information provided by persons knowledgeable about the subject property, records reviewed, the historical review of the subject property, and pending receipt and review of additional information as identified herein, no sources of potential or actual significant contamination were identified to be associated with the subject site.

ES 1.1 Other Considerations Designated Substances and Special Attention Items Due to the age of the residential building (constructed in 1810), it is likely to contain hazardous building materials such as asbestos and lead. These substances normally do not affect the day-to-day occupancy as long as building materials are in good condition, but become an important consideration if renovation (or demolition) is planned that may expose the hazardous materials. As demolition of the residential building on the site is planned for the near future and the floor tiles observed in the residential building are no longer in good condition, XCG recommends that a Designated Substances Survey (DSS) is conducted prior to initiating any demolition work. The primary objectives of a DSS is to identify readily accessible potential designated substances and compile an inventory of such materials at the subject site,


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx E2

to satisfy the requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA), Ontarios Designated Substance Regulation Ontario Regulation (O. Reg.) 490/09 (as amended), and O. Reg. 278/05, Designated Substance Asbestos on Construction Projects and in Buildings and Repair Operations, as amended. A DSS is required prior to initiating any demolition work, as outlined in the OHSA, and enforced by the Ontario Ministry of Labour (MOL).


TABLE OF CONTENTS

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx i

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1-1

1.1 Project Understanding, Purpose, and Use ...................................................... 1-1 1.2 Scope of Work ............................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Methodology .................................................................................................. 1-4

2. SITE INFORMATION ...................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Site Location and Description ........................................................................ 2-1

2.1.1 Property and Structures ............................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 Utility Services ............................................................................................. 2-2

2.2 Site Setting ..................................................................................................... 2-3

3. HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEWS AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE SEARCHES ..... 3-1 3.1 Property Title Search ..................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 City Directories .............................................................................................. 3-1 3.3 Fire Insurance Plans (FIPs) ............................................................................ 3-2 3.4 Property Underwriters Reports and Plans .................................................... 3-2 3.5 Aerial Photographs......................................................................................... 3-2 3.6 Previous Investigation and Assessment Reports............................................ 3-3 3.7 Environmental Databases............................................................................... 3-4 3.8 Regulatory Agency Records .......................................................................... 3-4

4. SITE VISIT .................................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Site Operations ............................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Stormwater ..................................................................................................... 4-1 4.3 Floor Drains, Pits, and Sumps........................................................................ 4-1 4.4 Wastewater/Sewers ........................................................................................ 4-2 4.5 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) ............................................................. 4-2 4.6 Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) ............................................................. 4-3 4.7 Chemicals/Raw Materials Use and Storage ................................................... 4-4

4.7.1 Chemical Spills/Releases .............................................................................. 4-4 4.8 Solid Waste .................................................................................................... 4-4 4.9 Fill Materials .................................................................................................. 4-5 4.10 Hazardous/Subject Waste Management ........................................................ 4-5 4.11 Air Emissions ................................................................................................. 4-5 4.12 Designated Substances and Special Attention Items ..................................... 4-5

4.12.1 Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) ....................................................... 4-5 4.12.2 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) ............................................................... 4-6 4.12.3 Lead-Based Paints ........................................................................................ 4-6 4.12.4 Ozone Depleting Substances - Chlorofluorocarbons ................................... 4-7 4.12.5 Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation (UFFI) ............................................. 4-7 4.12.6 Mercury ........................................................................................................ 4-7 4.12.7 Mould and Water Damage ........................................................................... 4-7

4.13 Ionizing Radiation and Radon Gas ................................................................ 4-7 4.14 Adjacent Property Use ................................................................................... 4-8

5. LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Limitations ..................................................................................................... 5-1


TABLE OF CONTENTS

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx ii

5.2 Conclusions .................................................................................................... 5-1 5.3 Other Considerations ..................................................................................... 5-1

6. REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 6-1

FIGURE Figure 1 Site Location Map .............................................................................. end of text

APPENDICES Appendix A Qualifications of XCG Project Personnel Appendix B Environmental Database, Heritage Report (excerpts), City Directories Appendix C Correspondence with Regulatory Agencies Appendix D MOECC Water Well Records Appendix E Site Photographs


INTRODUCTION

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 1-1

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Project Understanding, Purpose, and Use As requested by Ontario Zoroastrian Community Foundation (OZCF), XCG Consulting Limited (XCG) conducted a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), at the property and buildings located at 1187 Burnhamthorpe Road East, in Oakville, Ontario (subject property or site). XCG completed a Phase I ESA for the property when acquired in 2005, and it is understood that the site has not changed significantly. It is XCGs understanding that OZCF now proceeding with development of the property as a place of worship and requires an updated Phase I ESA.

The purpose of the Phase I ESA was to identify, through a non-intrusive investigation, the existence of any actual or potential sources of significant contamination associated with subject property. Based on XCGs understanding of OZCFs environmental risk tolerance, significant contamination means environmental site impairment issues that would affect the ongoing and planned future use of the property for congregation and worshipping purposes.

This Phase I ESA is not a compliance audit. Furthermore, XCG understands that this Phase I ESA will not be used for the purpose of obtaining a Record of Site Condition (RSC) for the subject property in accordance with Ontario Regulation (O. Reg.) 153/04 (as amended).

The Phase I ESA was conducted in general accordance with Canadian Standards Association (CSA) Standard Z768-01 (Phase I Standard) for conducting environmental site assessments. The Phase I ESA included a review of historical records, a subject site visit, interviews with persons knowledgeable about historic and current subject site operations, document reviews, and inquiries with regulatory agencies.

1.2 Scope of Work There are mandatory requirements to just meet the Phase I Standard, as well as several enhancements (which are listed as optional or helpful tasks, which may be agreed upon between the Client and Assessor). The Phase I Standard requires that the scope of any enhancements desired by the client be defined. OZCF requested that a standard Phase I ESA be conducted for the subject property.

The following tasks were conducted during the Phase I ESA:

1. Records Review Aerial Photographs;

Property-Use Records (e.g. fire insurance maps, city directories, contaminated site registries);

Prior Investigations/ESAs;


INTRODUCTION

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 1-2

XCG Consultants Ltd., Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of 1187 Burnhamthorpe Road East, Oakville, Ontario, dated June 30, 2005 (2005 Phase I ESA).

Environmental Databases;

Company Records, including if available, site plans, building plans, permit records, production and maintenance records, asbestos surveys, site utility drawings, emergency response and contingency plans, spill reporting plans and records, inventories of chemicals and their usage (e.g. WHMIS), environmental monitoring data, waste management records, inventory of underground and aboveground tanks; and

Regulatory Agency Records, including past, pending, outstanding, or continuing prosecutions, citations, control orders, third party complaints, violations of environmental statutes, regulations, by-laws, and/or permits.

2. Site Visit Conducting a site visit comprised of the following:

Inspecting the site and observing adjacent properties from the subject site and public areas;

Identifying and describing the potable water supply source;

Identifying visual and suspected areas of surface and subsurface contamination;

Identifying probable cut and fill operations that may have required that fill of unknown quality be deposited on the subject property;

Identifying and describing aboveground and underground storage tanks (ASTs and USTs), other storage containers, odours;

Identifying neighbouring land uses (i.e. sensitive neighbours, as well as potential off-site contamination, which may impact the subject property);

Identifying chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) in use, including air conditioning and refrigeration equipment that may use CFCs;

Identifying possible asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and urea formaldehyde foam insulation (UFFI);

Identifying potential polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-containing electrical capacitors and transformers;

Identifying potential lead-based paints;

Identifying water damage and mould;

Listing other hazardous materials, including wastes, and their relative quantities, types of containers, and storage conditions;


INTRODUCTION

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 1-3

Inspecting the interior of structures for evidence of contamination (this included observing heating and cooling systems for emissions and wastes, stains, floor cracks, sumps and drains, hydraulic hoists, and elevators); and

Inspecting the exterior of structures for indications of contamination (including the roof, if accessible), topographic, geographic, and hydrogeologic conditions observed, general description of the structures, wells, sewage disposal, pits, and lagoons, stressed vegetation, wastewater discharge, watercourses, ditches, and standing water, roads, parking facilities, and rights-of-way.

3. Interviews Contacting the Ministry of the Environment Climate Change (MOECC)

(because it is the main jurisdiction over environmental matters at this location) to determine whether they are aware of any environmental issues in the area that would negatively impact the subject property and the Technical Standards and Safety Authority (TSSA), Fuel Safety Division (FSD) (regarding fuel storage on-site and on adjacent properties); and

Conducting interviews with persons knowledgeable about the subject site and neighbouring properties.

4. Evaluation of Information and Reporting Preparation of a report documenting the findings, including the following:

Site location map and a site layout plan showing key features of the property, neighbours, roads, and areas of potential environmental concern (if any);

Discussion of the history of the property (with emphasis on activities that may have caused environmental impacts);

Identification and discussion of the significance of visual or suspected areas of contamination, hazardous materials, or other potential environmental concerns;

Description of the general geological and hydrogeological conditions in the area of the site (from available public sources and from site specific information obtained during the site visit);

Search of environmental databases regarding the subject site and surrounding properties; and

Review of aerial photographs and historical document reviews of the subject site and surrounding properties.

The following tasks were not conducted during the Phase I ESA:

Documentation requested from the MOECC through the Freedom of Information (FOI) process had not yet been received as of the date of this report, so the reviews of this information have not yet been completed (once received, the information will be reviewed and then forwarded to the client); and


INTRODUCTION

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 1-4

The roofs were not accessed by XCG.

1.3 Methodology The site visit was conducted by Ms. Ciara Leigh and Ms. Andrea DAmour of XCG. During the site visit, XCG completed a walk-through of the site, as well as a review of relevant site records made available to XCG, visual observations of adjacent properties as viewed from the subject site and surrounding public roadways, and interviews with individuals associated with the site.

Site personnel provided information regarding plant operations and historic site use. Ms. Leigh and Ms. DAmour were accompanied during the site visit by Mr. Phil Sidhwa, the Chair of the Place of Worship Committee associated with the facility for the past 12 years.

In addition to site personnel mentioned above, the following individuals and agencies were contacted for information concerning the subject property and surrounding area:

Ms. Catherine Choi, Opta Information Intelligence (Opta);

Mr. Steven Celebre, Ecolog ERIS (Ecolog);

Ontario MOECC, FOI Office, Toronto; and

Ms. Roxana Mashatler, Public Information Agent, (TSSA). Senior technical advice and a quality assurance review for this Phase I ESA was provided by Mr. Grant Walsom. Summaries of the qualifications of Ms. Leigh, Ms. DAmour, and Mr. Walsom are provided in Appendix A.


SITE INFORMATION

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 2-1

2. SITE INFORMATION

2.1 Site Location and Description

2.1.1 Property and Structures The subject property is located on the north side of Burnhamthorpe Road East, approximately 1.5 kilometres east of Trafalgar Road and 1.3 kilometres west of Ninth Line, in Oakville, Ontario. The subject property is zoned for existing development use and is situated in an area that predominately consists of agricultural land. The site and surrounding properties are shown on Figure 1. The two on-site buildings are located in the southeastern corner of the site. A summary of the physical description of the subject property, including the site structures is provided in the table below. Summary of Property and Structure Features

Property Features Findings Source

Site Legal Description PT LT 9, CON 2 TRAFALGAR, NORTH OF DUNDAS STREET, AS IN 365893; OAKVILLE.

Town of Oakville Interactive mapping

Site Area 40,774 m2 (10.07 acres). Town of Oakville Interactive mapping

Number of Buildings Two. Observation

Building Footprint(s) Residential building Approximately 215 m2. Congregation hall Approximately 238 m2 (not including covered patio on east side).

Google Earth

Approximate year of Construction and Significant Additions or Renovations

Residential building originally constructed in 1810, with significant additions throughout the years previous to 1936. Congregation Hall converted the former on-site garage since 2005.

Air Photo and ATA Heritage Report

Number of Floors Residential building Two. Congregation hall One.

Observation

Subsurface Levels (basements/crawl spaces, etc.)

Residential building Basement beneath original kitchen. Congregation hall None.

Observation

Exterior Construction Materials

Residential building Brick, vinyl siding, wood siding. Congregation hall Cinder blocks and steel framing.

Observation

Roof Construction Materials Asphalt shingles on both buildings. Observation and anecdotal from site contact

Interior Construction Materials Residential building Lath and plaster (original building), drywall, wood panelling. Congregation hall Drywall, cinder blocks, steel framing, concrete floor.

Observation and from previous reports


SITE INFORMATION

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 2-2

Property Features Findings Source

Exterior Surfaces of the Site (paved, landscaped, bare ground, etc.)

Asphalt driveway off Burnhamthorpe Road East, gravel parking lot, mown grass covering the majority of the site, long grasses along the eastern, northern, and western property boundaries.

Observation

During the subject site visit, an office and adjoining washroom on the second floor of the residential building was locked, preventing access to this area.

2.1.2 Utility Services Electricity is supplied by Oakville Hydro to the property from overhead wires off Burnhamthorpe Road East. Heating and air conditioning for the congregation hall are provided by a propane-fired heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) unit installed to the east of the hall. No heating was reported for the building previous to its renovation into the congregation hall. Heating for the residential building is provided by an oil-burning furnace installed in the basement. The heating oil AST is located immediately to the north of the residential building and was reportedly installed approximately 12 years ago. The capacity of the tank is approximately 910 L and it appears to be in good condition. There is no staining apparent on the ground near the tank. A former AST was located in the basement of the residential building. Slight staining, including water staining, was apparent in the 2005 site visit to the subject site. Additionally, the basement floor showed minor water staining throughout in previous site visits. However, no staining was visible to XCG personnel at the time of this site visit. XCG personnel also observed baseboard heating units in the residential building at the time of the site visit. Site personnel stated that they had always used the oil-burning furnace and had no further information regarding the baseboard heaters.

No municipal potable water and sanitary sewers are provided to the site. Site personnel stated that potable water is trucked to the site and stored in an underground cistern north of the residential building. A well (Well #3) that supplied water to the congregation hall was previously affiliated with this cistern, although it has since been disconnected. The underground cistern is reportedly a 6,000 gallon concrete tank, which was installed in 2008. Municipal water is delivered to the site by a licensed water hauler. No maintenance is conducted in regard to the cistern, though purification systems remain in the congregation hall, as well as the residential building. During the site visit, XCG personnel observed water softening units, which were disconnected, reportedly when the house and congregation hall wells were disconnected from the cistern. Two additional wells (Well #1, Well #2) are located on the property and supplied water to the house. Site personnel indicated that both wells are currently disconnected and that there are plans to decommission both wells in the near future (reportedly have since been decommissioned). Well #1 is a dug well, while Well #2 is a domestic bored well.

According to previous reports, the current septic system for the residential building was installed 25 to 30 years ago. Site personnel from the recent site visit stated that


SITE INFORMATION

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 2-3

there have been no issues with the septic system and indicated that it is located immediately adjacent to the east side of the residential building. The former septic system for the residential building is found north of the residential building. It was decommissioned at the same time the current one was installed. An additional septic system was installed when the garage was renovated to become the congregation hall in 2012. This septic system is located under a mound east of the congregation hall. Site personnel stated that there have been no issues regarding this septic system and that it is emptied based on a monitoring system, usually every six months. A fire pond and hydrant were also installed in the eastern corner of the property in 2012. The nearest municipal water supply well is located greater than 1.0 kilometre away from the subject site.

2.2 Site Setting An overview of the geology and hydrogeology of the site and surrounding area is provide below in order to assist in the evaluation of the potential for contaminant migration. Site setting information was obtained from sources as referenced. MOECC Water Well records reviewed are included as Appendix B. Summary of Site and Surrounding Area Geology and Hydrogeology

Site Setting Findings Source

Topography of Site and Surrounding Area

The site and surrounding area are generally flat. A small gully exists along the western and southern property boundaries.

Observation

Site Grade Relative to Adjacent Properties

The site is graded relatively evenly with all adjoining properties, with the exception of the gully on the western and southern sides of the property.

Observation

On-Site Surface Water and flow patterns

There is a small pond on the western side of the property, along the creek that follows the western and southern property lines, through a box culvert under Burnhamthorpe Road East and southward. This creek is a tributary of Joshuas Creek, which eventually empties into Lake Ontario.

2005 Phase I ESA

Fill Materials Gravel for parking lot. Anecdotal from site contact

Subsurface Soil (and depth if available)

Silt to silty clay matrix, high in matrix carbonate content and clast poor.

Map 2556 entitled Quaternary Geology of Ontario Southern Sheet, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. (1991) MOECC Water Well Records for within 1 kilometre of the subject site.


SITE INFORMATION

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 2-4


Bedrock Type (and depth if available)

Queenston Formation. Depth of approximately 3 metres to 7.6 metres.

Map 2544 entitled Bedrock Geology of Ontario Southern Sheet, MNR 1991 MOECC Water Well Records for within 1 kilometre of the subject site.

Nearest Surface Water Body A fire pond is located on the eastern corner of the site, with a connected hydrant to its west. A pond is found on the western side of the site along a creek that runs along the west and south property boundaries of the subject site. Lake Ontario is approximately 10 kilometres southeast from the subject property.

Observation and the 2005 Phase I ESA

Inferred Depth to Shallow Groundwater

Approximately 6 metres based on local observations wells.

MOECC Water Well Records for within 1 kilometre of the subject site.

Inferred Shallow Groundwater Flow Direction

It is anticipated that shallow groundwater would flow in a southerly direction toward Joshua Creek. The direction of shallow groundwater flow may be locally influenced by roadways, buried utilities, and geology.

Interpreted based on topography and distance to surface water bodies.

Nearest Water Supply Well On-site domestic well installed in 2008. The well is approximately 21 m below ground surface (bgs), with the pump intake set at 20.5 m. Steel casing is used to approximately 7.6 m bgs with an open hole (no screen) from 7.6 m bgs to the bottom of the well. Materials surrounding the open hole include red shale. This well is reportedly disconnected. An additional bored well is located south of the residential building. The well is approximately 16.8 m deep with the screen set from approximately 15 m to 16.8 m bgs. A hand dug well was installed in 1962. The well is approximately 16.5 m deep with the pump intake set at approximately 12 m bgs and 2 m of screen, set at the bottom of the hole. Both of the wells south of the residential building are reportedly disconnected and are planned to be decommissioned in the near future. No records for these wells exist in the MOECC Water Well Records.

MOECC Water Well Records for within 1.0 kilometre of the subject site.


SITE INFORMATION

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 2-5


Nearest Municipal Supply Well Greater than 1.0 kilometre from the subject site.

MOECC Water Well Records for within 1 kilometre of the subject site.

Other Pertinent Features (e.g. Gas/oil wells)

None noted.


HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEWS AND ENVIRONMENTAL

DATABASE SEARCHES

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 3-1

3. HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEWS AND ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE SEARCHES

3.1 Property Title Search Search of the property title records were not completed as part of this Phase I ESA.

3.2 City Directories City directory information for the subject property and surrounding area was provided by Ecolog ERIS from Polks Halton/Peel Regions, Ontario Criss-Cross Directory for the years 1958 to 2000, not inclusive. A copy of the EcoLog City Directories search is included in Appendix C.

The table below provides a list of historical occupants at the subject site and directly adjacent sites. Summary of City Directories Reviewed

Location Occupancy Date Listed Occupant

1187 Burnhamthorpe Road East (subject property)

Subject Site 1958-1965 Street not listed

1971-1989 Residential

1994 Address not listed

2000 Ontario Siding Div. of Jolic Enterprises Ltd.

1141 Burnhamthorpe Road East (cross-gradient from subject property)

North and West Adjacent Property

1958, 1965 Street not listed

1971-1989, 2000 Residential

1994 Address not listed


East Adjacent Property

1958-1965 Street not listed

1971-2000 Address not listed


East Adjacent Property

1958-1965 Street not listed

1971, 1994 Address not listed


2000 B R B K9 Obedience

1264 Burnhamthorpe Road East (cross- to down-gradient from subject property)

South Adjacent Property Across Burnhamthorpe Road East

1958, 1965 Street not listed

1971, 1989-2000 Address not listed




DATABASE SEARCHES

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 3-2

Due to the agricultural nature of the subject site and surrounding area and information noted above, XCG does not consider historical uses of the surrounding area as a potential environmental concern to the soil and/or groundwater quality on the subject property.

3.3 Fire Insurance Plans (FIPs) FIPs assist in the identification of historic land use and commonly indicate the existence and location of ASTs, USTs, structures, improvements, and facility operations. XCG contacted Opta to search for available historic FIPs for the site. No FIPs were available for review. Correspondence with Opta is provided in Appendix D.

3.4 Property Underwriters Reports and Plans XCG contacted Opta to search for available Property Underwriters Reports (PUR) and plans for the subject site. According to Opta, no PURs or Site Plans were available for review. Correspondence with Opta is provided in Appendix D.

3.5 Aerial Photographs Aerial photographs were reviewed to generally document the development of the site and properties in the vicinity of the site, and to identify potential on-site solid waste disposal areas. XCG reviewed aerial photographs dated 1934, 1946, 1962, 1971, 1988, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2014, and 2016. Summary of Aerial Photographs Reviewed

Date Scale

Subject Site Description Surrounding Area Comments

1934 Agricultural in nature. Four large buildings, most likely barns, are visible at the north side of the property. There is a treed area in the vicinity of where the existing structures are today.

Agricultural land.

1946 The four buildings noted in the 1934 aerial photograph are no longer visible. Foundations remain. The remainder of the subject property appears to be unchanged.

The adjacent property to the west appears to be further developed, resembling what it looks like today.

1962 No significant changes compared to the 1946 aerial photograph. The pond currently on the property is clearly visible in this aerial photograph.

The adjacent property to the west is slightly more developed than in the 1946 aerial photograph.

1971 No significant changes compared to the 1962 aerial photograph.

No significant changes compared to the 1962 aerial photograph.


No significant changes in the immediately surrounding areas compared to the 1962 aerial photograph. Local vicinity shows signs of encroaching development. Highway 403 now appears developed, as well as nearby subdivisions (greater than 1.0 kilometre from the subject property).

2004 The pond along the western property line is visible.




DATABASE SEARCHES

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 3-3

Date Scale

Subject Site Description Surrounding Area Comments



2006 A gravel parking lot has been added to the previous driveway northeast of the main building.




2009 The parking lot north of the main building has expanded in size. A cricket pitch is now visible on the north side of the property. A fire pond is now seen in the eastern corner of the property.


2014 An addition has been added to the northeastern side of the eastern building on the property, approximately doubling its size. This is the current congregation hall. It is a conversion of the former garage that existed. The expansion included the addition of a foyer and washrooms. No other significant changes are noted compared to the 2009 aerial photograph.

An additional building appears to have been constructed in the northern corner of the property directly adjacent to the west of the subject site. The adjacent property appears more industrial than previously, with more soil exposed and less grass cover, particularly toward the eastern side of the property.



No evidence of potential on-site solid waste disposal areas was identified on the reviewed aerial photographs.

3.6 Previous Investigation and Assessment Reports As part of this Phase I ESA, XCG reviewed the following reports previously prepared for the subject site:

XCG Consultants Ltd., Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of 1187 Burnhamthorpe Road East, Oakville, Ontario, dated June 30, 2005.

ATA Architects Inc., 1187 Burnhamthorpe Rd. E. Heritage Assessment, dated May, 2015.

A summary of the reports is provided below: XCG Consultants Ltd., Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of 1187 Burnhamthorpe Road East, Oakville, Ontario, dated June 30, 2005. The 2005 Phase I ESA, which was completed for the potential property owner for securing financing purposes, indicated that based on the results of the Phase I ESA, including the site visit, information provided by persons knowledgeable of the subject property, records reviewed, the historical review of the subject property, no significant potential or actual sources of contamination were identified to be associated with the subject site.



DATABASE SEARCHES

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 3-4

ATA Architects Inc., 1187 Burnhamthorpe Rd. E. Heritage Assessment, dated May, 2015. The Heritage Assessment, which was provided to XCG by site personnel at OZCF, indicated that:

In summary there is no indication that the property has any ties to a significant person, event or that it provided an important role in the community of the Trafalgar Township other than agriculture. There was nothing of significance found historically to warrant the designation of the property. Additional information from both the 2005 Phase I ESA and the Heritage Assessment is presented throughout this report.

3.7 Environmental Databases XCG contracted EcoLog ERIS Ltd. (EcoLog) to conduct a search of available federal, provincial, and private environmental databases for the site and surrounding 250 metres. Based on the location of the site, the database searches were completed to assist in the identification of environmental conditions at the site and on adjacent properties. A summary of actual or potential sources of contamination identified to be associated with the subject property is provided in the following table. The significance of the identified actual or potential sources was evaluated based on the details of the database information provided, the separation distance from the subject property, and location relative to the subject property based on the inferred direction of groundwater flow (up-gradient/down-gradient). The database search report is included in Appendix C. Summary of Actual or Potential Sources of Contamination Associated with the Subject Property Based on Database Searches

Occupant(s) Potential Sources of Contamination Data Source Reference

Evaluation of Significance

1187 Burnhamthorpe Road East Subject Site Jolic Enterprises Ltd.

Listed as a plumbing, heating, & air conditioning company, a metal doors, sash, frames, molding, & trim company, and a company that conducts sheet metal work. Established in 1976.

Scotts Manufacturing Directory

Not considered a significant source of impact to the subject site due to lack of registry as a waste generator and small size of operation.

3.8 Regulatory Agency Records On-site personnel were not aware of any regulatory agency concerns, complaints, notices of violation, or directions that have been issued against the site.

XCG submitted a request to the TSSA for records regarding USTs at the subject site and adjacent properties. The TSSA found no record in their database of any commercial fuel storage tanks at the addresses in question.



DATABASE SEARCHES

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 3-5

XCG has submitted a request to the MOECC under the FOI Act for information regarding any past complaints, violations, and/or MOECC directives concerning the subject site. Typically, the MOECC takes approximately 8 to 12 weeks to process a file search. A copy of any relevant information obtained from the MOECC file search will be forwarded to OZCF under separate cover when received by XCG.

Copies of correspondence with Regulatory Agencies are included in Appendix C.


SITE VISIT

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 4-1

4. SITE VISIT On July 13, 2017, Ms. Ciara Leigh and Ms. Andrea DAmour of XCG visited the buildings and related property that comprise the subject property. During the site visit, XCG completed a walk-through of the site and on-site structures, review of relevant site records made available to XCG, visual observations of adjacent properties as viewed from subject site and surrounding public roadways, and interviews with individuals associated with the site.

Key features of the subject property, including the layout of the residential building, congregation hall and surrounding neighbouring properties, are illustrated on Figure 2. Photographs taken during the site visit are provided in Appendix E.

4.1 Site Operations At the time of the site visit, the tenants at the subject property included a congregation hall and residential building operated by the Ontario Zoroastrian Community Foundation (OZCF).

Based on the information provided by site personnel and observations made by XCG during the site visit, OZCF is a not-for-profit organization and is now proceeding with development of the property as a place of worship. At the time of the subject site visit, there was a congregational hall and a residential building on site, both for gatherings and prayers.

According to site personnel and information obtained through the historical documents and environmental database review, historical on-site operations were largely agricultural, and also included the operation of Jolic Enterprises Ltd., a siding company.

4.2 Stormwater Based on information provided by site personnel and observations made during the site visit, the stormwater runoff collected from the building rooves discharge onto the ground surface. Stormwater runoff collecting on asphalt-paved and gravel areas is directed by surface grading towards one catch basin in the parking lot. According to site personnel, water collecting in this catch basin drains to the southwest of the parking lot onto the grassed ground surface of the subject property. No drawings showing the layout of the sewer systems at the site were available to XCG for review.

Site personnel were not aware of any sampling and chemical analysis of the stormwater discharges from the subject site, or any stormwater quality concerns associated with the subject site or on-site operations. No evidence of potential sources of adverse impact to stormwater quality at the subject site was observed by XCG during the site visit.

4.3 Floor Drains, Pits, and Sumps The presence of floor drains, pits, and sumps was investigated by XCG through observations made during the site visit and discussions with site personnel. At the time of the site visit, floor drains were observed in the two washrooms in the congregation


SITE VISIT

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 4-2

hall. No staining was observed in the proximity of the floor drains. No other drains, sumps or pits were observed by XCG or were reported to be present on site by the site personnel. Based on discussions with site personnel and observations made by XCG at the time of the site visit, the historical and current floor drains are not interpreted as potential sources of soil and/or groundwater impact on the subject property.

4.4 Wastewater/Sewers According to site personnel, the wastewater currently generated at the subject site includes domestic wastewater from the facility washrooms and sinks. The wastewater generated in the congregation hall and residential building reportedly discharges to two separate on-site septic systems, each comprising of a holding tank and leaching bed. The tank and leaching bed for the congregation hall are located to the east of the building, and the tank for the residential dwelling is located at the east side of the building and the leaching bed is located to the south of the building.

Historically, another septic system was used onsite. The former septic system is located north of the residential building and was decommissioned approximately 25 to 30 years ago, when the current septic system for the residential building was installed.

Based on observations made by XCG and according to site personnel, no municipal sanitary sewers are provided to the site.

4.5 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs) According to site personnel and based on XCGs observations, there are currently three active USTs and one inactive UST located on the subject site. The active USTs reportedly include:

One 6,000-gallon concrete cistern installed in approximately 2012;

One septic holding tank installed in approximately 2012; and

One septic holding tank installed between approximately 1990 and 1995.

The active concrete cistern is located north of the residential building. This UST was reportedly installed to hold water pumped from the nearby well, also installed in approximately 2012. Site personnel indicated that it has since been disconnected from the well and holds potable water trucked into site. Site personnel reported that there have been no issues with this UST.

The septic system installed in approximately 2012 is located east of the congregation hall. This UST was reportedly installed to manage domestic wastewater generated from the associated building. Site personnel reported that there have been no issues with this UST.

The septic system installed between approximately 1990 and 1995 is located east of the residential building. This UST was reportedly installed to replace a former septic system located north of the residential building and manage domestic wastewater generated from the associated building. Site personnel reported that there have been no issues with this UST.


SITE VISIT

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 4-3

Site personnel indicated that no maintenance is conducted in regard to the concrete cistern. Additionally, no maintenance is conducted in regard to the septic systems, which are emptied approximately twice a year, or as regulated by the monitoring systems. Releases, if any, associated with the operation of the current septic system USTs represent a potential impact to soil and groundwater quality at the subject site, the nature and extent of which are not currently known. However, non-routine releases from the septic systems are not expected, thus, the potential for impact is considered to be low.

At the time of the site visit, site personnel reported that the former septic system was located north of the residential building. According to previous reports it was decommissioned at the time that the new septic system was installed, between approximately 1990 and 1995.

Based on discussions with facility personnel, there are no other active or inactive USTs located on subject site, and no other USTs have historically been owned or operated at the subject site to their knowledge. At the time of the site visit, no physical evidence suggesting the presence of any other on-site USTs (e.g. vent pipes, fill pipes, etc.) was observed by XCG.

XCG contacted the TSSA to obtain information with respect to the potential storage of petroleum fuels on subject site and to determine if there have been any infractions of Provincial regulations concerning the storage of petroleum or associated products. The TSSA found no record in their database of any fuel storage tanks at the addresses in question.

4.6 Aboveground Storage Tanks (ASTs) According to information provided by site personnel and observations made by XCG during the site visit, the ASTs currently operated on subject site include:

One estimated 227,100-litre (60,000-gallon) double-walled propane AST located southeast of the congregation hall; and

One estimated 910-litre (200-gallon) heating oil AST located adjacent to the exterior east wall of the office/scale house.

At the time of the site visit, all the above listed ASTs were located on concrete pads directly on the ground surface. None of the ASTs were equipped with secondary containment. During the site visit, no evidence of significant spills and/or release onto the exterior ground surface was observed around the ASTs.

Based on discussions with facility personnel, there are no other active or inactive ASTs located on-site. However, according to previous reports, a former AST for the oil-burning furnace was located in the building of the residential building. This AST was removed upon installation of the current heating oil AST. Slight staining, including water staining, was apparent near the area of the former tank. Despite previous observations, XCG personnel did not observe any staining in the basement of the residential building during the latest site visit. Based on discussions with site personnel and observations made by XCG at the time of the site visit, the historical and current


SITE VISIT

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 4-4

ASTs are not interpreted as potential sources of soil and/or groundwater impact on the subject property.

4.7 Chemicals/Raw Materials Use and Storage Based on discussions with site personnel and observations made by XCG during the site visit, chemicals currently used and stored on the subject site include:

Paint; and

Domestic cleaning supplies.

According to site personnel, domestic cleaning supplies are stored under kitchen sinks in each building as well as in the storage closet in the mens washroom in the congregation hall. Commercial sized paint cans are stored in the western-most room of the residential building. Site personnel indicated the locations of floor drains in the washrooms of the congregation hall. XCG did not observe any floor drains being present in the vicinity of the paint storage area.

Facility personnel were not aware of any significant spills or releases of chemicals used and stored on site. No evidence of staining was observed on ground surfaces in the vicinity of chemical storage areas.

4.7.1 Chemical Spills/Releases According to site personnel no significant spills or releases have ever occurred at the site. At the time of the site visit, XCG did not observe any evidence of significant spills or releases. No evidence of significant surface staining indicative of historic releases was observed on exterior surfaces inspected by XCG.

4.8 Solid Waste Based on discussions with site personnel and observations made by XCG, solid wastes currently generated at the subject site include:

Kitchen waste; and

General refuse.

According to site personnel, kitchen waste and general refuse are disposed of in the dumpster on site and any recyclable materials were taken off-site by members of the congregation.

At the time of the site visit, XCG personnel also observed the aforementioned dumpster at the north end of the gravel parking lot. Additionally, open-topped drums were present around the perimeter of the gravel parking lot, reportedly to collect general refuse.

Site personnel stated that, to their knowledge, no solid wastes have been disposed of on subject site. At the time of the site visit, XCG observed a single garbage can along the northwest subject property boundary. No evidence of on-site solid waste burial was observed by XCG.


SITE VISIT

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 4-5

4.9 Fill Materials Fill material composition and source location are considerations in determining whether environmental concerns are present. The subject property is mostly flat in the area of the on-site building. Site personnel stated that gravel was brought onto site for the purpose of creating a parking lot. However, based on the topography of the subject site and surrounding area as well as observations made by XCG at the time of the site visit, XCG does not expect a significant amount of imported fill material to be present at the subject property.

4.10 Hazardous/Subject Waste Management According to information provided by site personnel and review of the MOECC HWIN database, the subject site is not registered as a Generator of Subject Wastes.

Site personnel were not aware of any on-site disposal of regulated or hazardous waste. No evidence of on-site regulated or hazardous waste disposal was observed by XCG at the time of the site visit.

4.11 Air Emissions Based on information provided by facility personnel and observations made by XCG, air emission sources operated at the subject site include the following:

Fuel oil-fired furnace located in the residential building; and

Propane-fired HVAC unit located in the congregation hall.

Based on discussions with site personnel and observations made by XCG at the time of the site visit, the historical and current air emission sources are not interpreted as potential sources of soil and/or groundwater impact on the subject property. At the time of the site visit, the building rooves were not accessible for inspection.

4.12 Designated Substances and Special Attention Items

4.12.1 Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) The presence of ACM at the subject site was investigated through observations made by XCG and through discussions with site personnel.

Facility personnel were unaware of an asbestos survey or monitoring for the presence of airborne asbestos fibres having been conducted at the subject site. The congregation building was constructed in 2012 and is not expected to contain any ACMs.

The residential dwelling was originally constructed in 1810 with various additions throughout the years. Potential ACMs observed included drywall and joint compound, and floor tile located within the residential building. The floor tiles observed by XCG which are potentially asbestos containing were found in the northernmost room of the residential building. Some of these tiles were lifting or detached from the floor, exposing the adhesive underneath; however, each of the individual floor tiles were intact. The tiles, if containing asbestos, would be non-friable. The exposed adhesive is also potentially asbestos containing. Photographs of the lifting tiles and exposed adhesive are included in Appendix E.


SITE VISIT

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 4-6

No intrusive investigations were conducted by XCG to examine areas of concealed space for the presence of ACM and, as such, additional potential or actual ACM may be present in areas not accessible to XCG during the site visit. As demolition of the residential building on the site is planned for the near future and the floor tiles observed are no longer in good condition, XCG recommends that a Designated Substances Survey (DSS) is conducted prior to initiating any demolition work. The primary objectives of a DSS is to identify readily accessible potential designated substances and compile an inventory of such materials at the subject site, to satisfy the requirements of the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA), Ontarios Designated Substance Regulation O. Reg. 490/09 (as amended), and O. Reg. 278/05, Designated Substance Asbestos on Construction Projects and in Buildings and Repair Operations, as amended. A DSS is required prior to initiating any demolition work, as outlined in the OHSA, and enforced by the Ontario Ministry of Labour (MOL).

4.12.2 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) According to site personnel and based on XCGs observations, no PCBs are known to be used or stored on subject site. A pole-mounted transformer is located near the eastern corner of the property boundaries, along Burnhamthorpe Road East. There was no staining or leaking observed in the vicinity of this transformer by XCG personnel either during the 2005 or 2017 site visits. In addition, the 2005 Phase I report indicated that the garage (now the congregational hall) had several fluorescent light ballasts installed on the ceiling. The light ballasts appeared to be in good condition at the time. The building has since been renovated and the light ballasts have been removed. No evidence of PCBs in the congregational hall was observed by XCG personnel at the time of the July 2017 site visit. As such, PCBs are not interpreted to represent a significant environmental liability at the subject property.

4.12.3 Lead-Based Paints The presence of lead-based paints at the subject site was investigated through observations made by XCG and through discussions with site personnel.

Facility personnel were unaware of a lead-based paint survey having been conducted at the subject site. Potential lead-based paints were observed on the interior walls of the residential building, on the main and second floors. All painted surfaces were observed to be in good condition with no evidence of cracking, peeling, or flaking paint; and even if the paints are lead-based, should pose no health hazard unless disturbed. However, as demolition of the residential building on the site is planned for the near future, XCG recommends that a DSS is conducted prior to initiating any demolition work. The primary objectives of a DSS is to identify readily accessible potential designated substances and compile an inventory of such materials at the subject site, to satisfy the requirements of the OHSA, Ontarios Designated Substance Regulation O. Reg. 490/09 (as amended), and O. Reg. 278/05, Designated Substance Asbestos on Construction Projects and in Buildings and Repair Operations, as amended. A DSS is required prior to initiating any demolition work, as outlined in the OHSA, and enforced by the MOL.


SITE VISIT

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 4-7

4.12.4 Ozone Depleting Substances - Chlorofluorocarbons Based on discussions with site personnel and observations made by XCG during the site visit, equipment potentially containing CFCs identified at the subject site was limited to the refrigerators in the residential dwelling and the congregation hall and the HVAC unit installed southeast of the congregation hall. Even if CFC-containing, the HVAC unit is not interpreted to represent a significant environmental liability.

4.12.5 Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation (UFFI) The presence of UFFI at the subject site was investigated through observations made by XCG and through discussions with site personnel.

Facility personnel were unaware of an UFFI survey or monitoring for the presence of formaldehyde vapours having been conducted at the subject site.

No intrusive investigations were conducted by XCG to examine areas of concealed space for the presence of UFFI and, as such, additional potential or actual UFFI may be present in areas not accessible to XCG during the site visit.

4.12.6 Mercury The presence of mercury at the subject site was investigated through observations made by XCG and through discussions with site personnel.

Site personnel were unaware of any significant amounts of mercury being present at the subject site. Small quantities of mercury are likely present inside the various electrical switches and high intensity discharge (HID) lighting observed inside in the building and in the outdoor storage areas; however, at the time of the site visit, all lights observed by XCG appeared to be functional and even if mercury-containing, are not interpreted to represent a significant environmental liability.

4.12.7 Mould and Water Damage The presence of mould at the subject site was investigated through observations made by XCG and through discussions with site personnel.

During the 2005 site visit, XCG observed minor water staining on the basement floor of the residential building. However, no evidence of such staining was visible to XCG personnel during the 2017 site visit. Furthermore, XCG did not observe any evidence of mould growing on the surface of the ceiling tiles. No intrusive investigations were conducted by XCG to examine areas of concealed space and no sampling for mould or destructive investigations (e.g. cutting drywall to inspect wall cavities) was conducted. As such, additional potential or actual mould may be present in areas not accessible to XCG during the site visit.

4.13 Ionizing Radiation and Radon Gas According to site personnel, the on-site activities have not included the use of any ionizing sources of radiation. No radiation sources were observed by XCG during the site visit. Site personnel were unaware of any radon gas testing having been conducted at the subject site.


SITE VISIT

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 4-8

4.14 Adjacent Property Use The properties adjacent to the subject site were visually inspected, without accessing the properties, for evidence of existing or potential environmental concerns related to the Phase I ESA. Historical operations conducted on the adjacent properties were previously discussed in Section 3.

The following presents a summary of observations made by XCG with regard to the current operations and land uses on the adjacent properties. Summary of Adjacent Current Property Use

Location Property Use/ Occupant Observations Elevation Relative to

Subject Site

Adjacent property to the north and west (up- to cross-gradient)

1141 Burnhamthorpe Road East

Residential dwelling. Agricultural property. Cattle and waterfowl observed on site. In addition, scrap metal and general refuse was visible from the subject site.

Approximately level with the subject site. However, a gully exists between the subject site and this site at the subject sites western property boundary.

Adjacent properties to the east (cross-gradient)


Bark n Fly Doggie Day-care.

Domestic and agricultural buildings. Agricultural land.

Level with the subject site.

PT LT 8, CON 2 TRAF NDS; S/T A PERMANENT EASEMENT OVER PTS 3, 4 & 5 EXP. PL HR1307681 TOWN OF OAKVILLE

Agricultural land. Agricultural. Level with the subject site.

Adjacent properties to the south Across Burnhamthorpe Road East (down-gradient)





Site personnel were not aware of any adverse environmental impact to the site from the adjacent properties. No visual evidence of adverse environmental impact to the subject site from the adjacent properties was observed by XCG at the time of the site visit.


LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 5-1

5. LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

5.1 Limitations This Phase I ESA was prepared in general accordance with the CSA Phase I ESA Standard Z768-01. The findings and conclusions regarding sources of significant contamination to the subject property provided in this report are based solely on the extent of observations and information gathered during the Phase I ESA. As such, XCG cannot be held responsible for environmental conditions at the property that were not apparent from the available information.

This Phase I ESA focuses on identifying sources of actual and potential significant contamination on the subject property and it is not a compliance audit. Based on XCGs understanding of OZCFs environmental risk tolerance, significant contamination means environmental site impairment issues that would affect the ongoing and planned future use of the property for congregation and worshipping purposes.

The Phase I ESA is not intended to be a detailed audit of all past or current operations. No sampling or chemical analysis of air, soil, water, or other material was undertaken as part of this assessment. As such, detailed building inspections and subsurface investigations in subsequent phases or studies may encounter conditions not apparent at this time.

The scope of this report is limited to the matters expressly covered. This report is prepared for the sole benefit of OZCF for the purpose of proceeding with the development of the property as a place of worship and may not be relied upon by any other person or entity without the written authorization of XCG Consulting Limited. Any use or reuse of this document (or the findings and conclusions represented herein), by parties other than those listed above, is at the sole risk of those parties.

5.2 Conclusions Based on the results of the Phase I ESA, including the site visit, information provided by persons knowledgeable about the subject property, records reviewed, the historical review of the subject property, and pending receipt and review of additional information as identified herein, no sources of potential or actual significant contamination were identified to be associated with the subject site.

5.3 Other Considerations Designated Substances and Special Attention Items Due to the age of the residential building (constructed in 1810), it is likely to contain hazardous building materials such as asbestos and lead. These substances normally do not affect the day-to-day occupancy as long as building materials are in good condition, but become an important consideration if renovation (or demolition) is planned that may expose the hazardous materials. As demolition of the residential building on the site is planned for the near future and the floor tiles observed in the residential building are no longer in good condition, XCG recommends that a DSS is conducted prior to initiating any demolition work. The primary objectives of a DSS is


LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 5-2

to identify readily accessible potential designated substances and compile an inventory of such materials at the subject site, to satisfy the requirements of OHSA, Ontarios Designated Substance Regulation O. Reg. 490/09 (as amended), and O. Reg. 278/05, Designated Substance Asbestos on Construction Projects and in Buildings and Repair Operations, as amended. A DSS is required prior to initiating any demolition work, as outlined in the OHSA, and enforced by the Ontario MOL.


REFERENCES

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx 6-1

6. REFERENCES 1. Canadian Standards Association, 2001. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment -

Z768-01.

2. XCG Consultants Ltd., Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of 1187 Burnhamthorpe Road East, Oakville, Ontario, dated June 30, 2005.

3. ATA Architects Inc., 1187 Burnhamthorpe Rd. E. Heritage Assessment, dated May, 2015.

4. Aerial Photographs from 1934, 1946, 1962, 1971 and 1988, National Air Photo Library in Ottawa.

5. Aerial Photographs from 2004, 2005, 2009, 2014 and 2016, Google Earth Historical Imagery.

6. EcoLog ERIS, Database Report, 5-1964-01-02, 1187 Burnhamthorpe Rd E, Oakville ON L6H7B3, Standard Report, dated July 18, 2017.

7. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, Map 2556, entitled Quaternary Geology Southern Sheet, 1991.

8. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, Map 2544, entitled Bedrock Geology of Ontario Southern Sheet, 1991.


FIGURE

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx

FIGURE

C

U

L

V

E

R

T

FORMER VEGETABLE GARDEN

WELL #2

WELL #1

FORMER SEPTIC SYSTEM

FORMER DOG HOUSE

FORMER SHED

RESIDENCE

GRAVEL

ASPHALT

CRICKET PITCH

T

AST

CURRENT

SEPTIC

SYSTEM

MOWED

FIELD

FIRE POND

HYDRANT

FIRE

POND

HALL

SEPTIC

BED

AST

WELL #3

AGRICULTURAL

AGRICULTURAL

RESIDENTIAL /

AGRICULTURAL

CISTERN AND

ACCESS PORTS

D

U

N

D

A

S

S

T

W

T

R

A

F

A

L

G

A

R

R

D

B

U

R

N

H

A

M

T

H

O

R

P

E

R

D

E

H

W

Y

4

0

7

H

W

Y

4

0

3

DRAWING REFERENCE: Figure based on Halton Region online mapping and XCG field notes.NOTE: Location of building, underground utilities, etc. are for reference only and should not be relied upon for detailed design, renovation, or construction purposes. Property boundary and building locations shown may not represent actual surveyed boundaries. FILE: O519640102001.dwg

LEGEND:

APPROXIMATE SUBJECT

PROPERTY BOUNDARIES

KEY MAPNOT TO SCALE

0 50m25

SHEET: O519640102001FIG01.pdf

APPROXIMATE PROPERTY

BOUNDARIES

GRASSED AREA

APPROXIMATE MONITORING

WELL LOCATION

FENCELINE

CATCH BASIN

FORMER FEATURES

Environmental Engineers & Scientists

CREEK


APPENDICES

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx

APPENDIX A QUALIFICATIONS OF XCG PROJECT PERSONNEL

KIT0617

Ms. DAmour joined XCG in 2017 in our Kitchener office. She is experienced in environmental field techniques, subsurface investigations, surface water sampling, groundwater sampling, and interacting with private homeowners as a part of larger projects. Since joining our team, Ms. DAmour has assisted with Sampling Programs and Reporting, including a Phase II ESA.

Education

Project Experience

Bachelor of Science, Chemical Engineering, Queens University Continuing Education:

WHMIS 40-Hour HAZWOPER Training (OSHA). Annual 8-Hour OSHA Refresher Training. Working at Heights Training

Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Experience

Organization of analytical data in tabular format for environmental reports, indicating sample identification, location, depth, analytical concentrations, regulatory criteria, and QA/QC samples.

Experience preparing technical reports drawing together the scope of work, field observations, analytical summaries, and conclusions.

Collected groundwater, surface water, and soil for analysis of various environmental parameters in accordance with XCGs Standard Operating Procedures. Experience observing drilling activities and well installations, collecting worst-case samples to determine soil and groundwater quality.

Experienced in measuring water levels and using survey techniques to determine groundwater elevations and direction of groundwater flow.

Subsurface Investigation Experience

Experienced in overseeing drilling activities on over 100 residential properties for the Port Hope Area Initiative (PHAI) with Arcadis Canada.

Completed surface gamma radiation surveys at over 200 residential and commercial properties for the PHAI with Arcadis Canada.

Surface Water and Groundwater Sampling Experience

Collected surface water and groundwater samples throughout the Ganaraska watershed for the Provincial Water Quality Monitoring and Provincial Groundwater Monitoring Network with the Ganaraska Region Conservation Authority (GRCA).

Experience conducting stream flow rate measurements at surface monitoring stations to confirm calibration of automated data loggers as part of the Provincial Water Quality Monitoring Network with the GRCA.

Experience maintaining equipment and sites for sampling throughout the Ganaraska watershed, including groundwater, surface water, and snow courses.

Public and Client Relations Experience

As a part of the PHAI work with Arcadis, accessed private property and entered private homes with the homeowners permission, to conduct radiological investigations. Regularly interacted with homeowners who were a part of the project, providing information or additional contact information as necessary. Spoke at times with public who would approach the work site and provide a brief description of the project.

KIT1014

Ms. Leigh joined XCG in 2014 in our Kitchener office. She is experienced in emissions reporting, environmental field techniques, site remediation, Environmental Site Assessments, Environmental Compliance Approvals, National Pollutant Release Inventory reporting as well as the Risk Assessment process. Since joining our team, Ms. Leigh has assisted with several Sampling Programs and Remedial Activities, including projects completed to obtain a Record of Site Condition (RSC).

Education

Project Experience

Bachelor of Science, Chemical Engineering, Queens University Continuing Education:

PEO Engineering Intern (EIT) Program WHMIS 40-Hour HAZWOPER Training (OSHA). Annual 8-Hour OSHA Refresher Training. Working at Heights Training

Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) Experience Environmental Site Assessor of over 35 different Phase I ESAs (sites varied to include:

residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural and vacant properties) in accordance with the CSA Phase I ESA Standard Z768-01. Phase I ESAs included completing a site visit, interviews with persons knowledgeable of current and historic site operations, review of historical information related to the site and neighbouring properties, contacting regulatory authorities and report preparation.

Organization of analytical data in tabular format for environmental reports, indicating sample identification, location, depth, analytical concentrations, regulatory criteria, and QA/QC samples.

Experience preparing technical reports drawing together the scope of work, field observations, analytical summaries, and conclusions.

Collected groundwater, surface water, and soil samples at over 10 sites across southern Ontario for analysis of various environmental parameters in accordance with XCGs Standard Operating Procedures. Experience observing drilling activities and well installations at over 5 sites across southern Ontario, including a three week drilling program in Barrie, Ontario, collecting worst-case samples to determine soil and groundwater quality.

Experienced in measuring water levels and using survey techniques to determine groundwater elevations and direction of groundwater flow.

Experienced in reviewing historic reports and data for contaminated sites, including historical data validation.

Remedial Activities Observed a large-scale excavation of two 56,780 liter (15,000 gallon) diesel fuel tanks and

associated fuel island, and the removal of approximately 4000 tonnes of contaminated soil Collected confirmatory sampling for the excavations in accordance with the TSSAs Environmental Management Protocol for Fuel Handling Sites in Ontario.

2 KIT0914

Project Experience

Emissions Investigation Experience

Completed ECA (Air) [formerly Certificates of Approval (Air)] applications for a chemical manufacturing plant in Guelph, a headstone manufacturer in Kitchener and a landfill gas mitigation system in Kitchener. The applications included basic and comprehensive, as well as amendments to existing ECAs for modifications to facility equipment. Tasks included determination of air emission sources, calculation of emissions from the facility, modeling contaminant emissions, and preparation of ESDM reports.

Completed annual ESDM updates as a part of flexible Certificates of Approval for a metal plating facility in Brantford, and projector manufacture in Kitchener.

Completed National Pollutant Release Inventory assessments for a metal plating facility in Brantford, projector manufacture in Kitchener and a textile dying facility in Listowel, Ontario, including filing emission amounts with Environment Canada using their on-line SWIM reporting system.

Completed Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimating for a metal plating facility in Brantford

ESAKIT0717

Mr. Walsom is a senior remediation engineer with over 23 years of experience. He is a Partner at XCG Consulting Limited and leads the Remediation and Risk Assessment Business Unit. Mr. Walsom is a Professional Engineer registered in Ontario and Alberta, and a registered Consulting Engineer in Ontario. In addition, Mr. Walsom is a Qualified Person as defined by the Ontario Regulation 153/04 (Brownfield Regulation).

His expertise has included Phase I and II ESAs, Site Remediation, and Environmental Compliance Audits (for both external and pre-acquisition purposes). He has completed numerous Brownfield redevelopments and soil and groundwater remediation projects with virtually all contaminant sources, including metals (including arsenic, copper, lead, and zinc), PCBs, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents and VOCs, PAHs (including coal tar), and pesticides/herbicides.

Mr. Walsom currently is the Chair of the Board of Directors for the Ontario Environment Industry Association (ONEIA) and is the co-Chair for the Excess Soils Working Group of the Brownfield Advocacy Committee. Mr. Walsom also serves on the Board of Directors for the Canadian Brownfield Network (CBN) as President.

Mr. Walsom enjoys participating in speaking engagements and presentations regarding site remediation case-studies, Brownfield redevelopment and excess soil management.

Education

Professional Affiliations

Associations

Project Experience

B.A.Sc., Civil Engineering, Options in Environmental Engineering/Water Resources Engineering, University of Waterloo, 1994

Diploma Business Administration, Wilfred Laurier University, 2007 OSHA 40 hour Health and Safety Training Certificate in Leadership, Continuing Education, University of Waterloo, 2010

Professional Engineers Ontario Registered Consulting Engineer in Ontario Canadian Environmental Auditing Association Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists Alberta

Ontario Environment Industry Association - 2011-present o Chair of Board of Directors (2017) o Co-Chair of Excess Soils Working Group

Canadian Brownfields Network - 2013-Present o Chair of Board of Directors (President, 2017) o Conference Committee and Awards Committee

Recent Examples of Project Experience:

Site Assessment, soil and groundwater remediation, and excess soil management consulting for a historical rubber products industrial property being redeveloped for commercial use in Toronto, Ontario. Certification of excess soil quality required for receiving site.

Internal consulting to XCG Project team overseeing the construction of an earth cap using excess soil on a heavily contaminated harbor property in Oshawa, Ontario.

Creating a soil management plan for the acceptance of excess soil to redevelop a former aggregate quarry in London, Ontario.

2 ESAKIT0717

Project Experience

.

Assessment and certification of excess soil for redevelopment at a commercial pad site in Hamilton, Ontario. Certification required for excess soil receiving site.

Expert reviewer for citizens group related to placement of excess soil/fill with questionable quality at Burlington Airpark.

Design and Construction of a soil vapour collection system at a former dry-cleaner in a strip mall in Guelph, Ontario.

Pre-acquisition site assessment and liabilities quantification for a major heavy metal recovery facility in southern Ontario.

Third Party Peer Review for a site remediation program at a historical industrial property in Toronto for redevelopment into residential use. Review all technical data, progress review and cost/payment approvals. Recommendations for program adjustment leading to preparation of Record of Site Condition.

Environmental Consulting Services for closure and sale of a former liquid industrial waste transfer and treatment facility in southwestern Ontario. Site Assessments and Remediation design activities for mixed chlorinated solvents and hydrocarbon impacts in soil and groundwater. Negotiations with Ontario Ministry of Environment and Climate Change for closure of approvals.

Assessment and Remediation of groundwater impacted with hydrocarbons migrating off-site from a vacant commercial property to neighbouring properties in Hamilton, Ontario using in-situ oxidation methods.

Assessment and Delineation of chlorinated VOCs at a former mall property with dry-cleaner in Hamilton, Ontario. Remedial design activities and recommendations to environmental insurance provider.

Site Assessments, UST removals, and remediation at a former historical printing facility undergoing redevelopment into residential condominiums in Owen Sound, Ontario. Completion of Risk Assessment, Certificate of Property Use, and Records of Site Condition (2).

Peer review and remediation design for a mixed chlorinated VOCs plume at an industrial property in Brampton, Ontario. Reporting at completion was required to secure bank financing.

Full peer review of extensive documentation and remediation design and implementation of a former dry-cleaning site in a mall property in Mississauga, Ontario.

Continued Site Assessment and Remediation, Risk Assessment leading to Record of Site Condition for a long-time historical tire manufacturing facility in Hamilton, Ontario. Remediation of chlorinated VOCs, PHCs, PAHs, and heavy metals in soil and groundwater has taken place through a combination of traditional excavation methods, pump-and-treat of groundwater, in-situ chemical oxidation, and construction of a flow-through reactive barrier.

Assessment of chlorinated VOCs at a historical industrial property in Waterloo, Ontario. Design, construction and operation of a groundwater pump-and-treat system for the destruction of 1,4-dioxane in groundwater using enhanced UV oxidation.

Design and Implementation of an in-situ flow-through barrier using chemical reduction and bioremediation processes in Cambridge, Ontario. Flow-through barrier was a preventative measure for the migration of deep impacted groundwater to off-site receptors. The barrier was also a condition of CPU derived from Risk Assessment and Risk Management Measures leading to a Record of Site Condition to support a property sale from a bankruptcy receiver.

Project Manager for Phase I and II ESAs of a portfolio of approximately 100 Bell Canada Central Offices/Switch Centres across Ontario.

Over 80 Phase I ESAs and Compliance Audits for meat and food processing plants across Canada for a major Canadian Food Processing firm.

Site Assessments of over 800 hectares of forest lands, related forestry operation sites and an 80 year old paper mill site in the Thunder Bay area. The site assessments lead to extensive Phase II subsurface investigations for divestiture purposes.

3 ESAKIT0717

Project Experience

Awards

Publications & Presentations

Pre-acquisition Phase I and II ESAs at seven historic scrap yards in the northeast United States. Phase I ESA and Phase II investigations at an inactive property in Pennsylvania, historically used

for dismantling railway engines. This study became a detailed investigation into evaluating the impacts of and cost implications of soil, groundwater, and surface water impacts of PCBs, PAHs, and heavy metals on the property.

Phase II Site Assessments at CN Rail Bulk Fuel Facility and Maintenance Yards in Hornepayne and Capreol, Ontario.

Project Coordinator and on-site observer for investigations of coal tar impacts into bedrock and area water supply.

Detailed Phase I ESA and Phase II Investigations for an abandoned tire manufacturing facility leading into remediation activities for TCE impacted groundwater and surface soils impacted with lead and zinc.

Design and implementation of detailed Phase II subsurface investigations and a Remedial Action Plan to mitigate chlorinated solvent impacts in shallow groundwater at an industrial facility in Waterloo, Ontario.

Environmental services related to full site closure of a former liquid waste transfer facility located in Etobicoke, Ontario. Specific activities included Phase I and II ESAs, diesel UST removal and site remediation, and preparation of a decommissioning report and record of site condition.

Phase I and II ESAs for the site closure of a former contaminated soil treatment facility in North York, Ontario. Closure had to be approved by the Ministry of Environment.

Phase I and II ESAs leading to the remediation of soil impacted with cutting oil at a former metal fabrication facility.

Pre-acquisition Phase I ESA and detailed Phase II subsurface investigations for a secondary aluminum smelter with a large on-site dross landfill and a groundwater plume impacted with TCE in Richmond, Virginia.

Design and implement extensive Phase II subsurface investigations for the plume of chlorinated solvents in a water supply aquifer migrating off-site from a liquid industrial waste facility in Ontario.

Completion of a Phase I and II ESA for a heavy metals recycling facility prior to facility closure and remediation for property divesture.

Pre-acquisition Phase I and II ESA at a historical waste oil recovery and recycling facility in Clayton, New Jersey.

Phase I ESA at a medium-sized commercial airport prior to privatization. Phase I and II ESA for litigation purposes at a historical industrial property with hydrocarbon

contamination.

Phase I ESAs at five historical railway properties in Southern Ontario for divestiture purposes. Semi-annual groundwater monitoring program for PCBs in shallow soil and bedrock aquifer units

at a property in Etobicoke, Ontario, 1998 to 2002. Canadian Urban Institute Brownfielder of the Year, October 2015

Available upon request


APPENDICES

5-1964-01-02/R519640102001.docx

APPENDIX B ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS, HERITAGE

REPORT (EXCERPTS), CITY DIRECTORIES

1187 Burnhamthorpe Road East Oakville ON Canada

38517

Andrea DAmourXCG Consulting Ltd

7/17/2017 2:02:26 PM

Catherine

Page: 2Project Name: 519640102 Search Area: 1187 Burnhamthorpe Road East

Oakville ON Canada

OPTA INFORMATION INTELLIGENCE

ENVIROSCAN Report

Requested by:Andrea DAmour

Date Completed: 07/17/2017 14:02:26

Opta Historical Environmental Servi

HASE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 1187 … planning/da-120908... · 2019-07-22 · 1187...

Documents

Transcript of HASE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 1187 … planning/da-120908... · 2019-07-22 · 1187...