Group P_Siebel Systems
-
Upload
sreya-ghose -
Category
Documents
-
view
1.123 -
download
2
Transcript of Group P_Siebel Systems
![Page 1: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Siebel Systems: Anatomy of a SaleCase Analysis
Group PPriyanka de
NoronhaRishi RajSaumitra
AmbegaokarSreya GhoseTejas Pradhan
![Page 2: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Agenda
• Part 1: Introduction to Siebel Systems
• Part 2: How did Siebel gain leadership status?
• Part 3: The Situation• Part 4: Questions, analysis &
Summary
![Page 3: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
INTRODUCTION TO SIEBEL SYSTEMS
Part 1
![Page 4: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Siebel Systems: Background
• Siebel Systems founded by Tom Siebel1993• Revenues reached $2 bn• Fortune Magazine had rated Siebel as one of
the fastest growing companies in USA for the past three years
• 8,000 people employed
2000
• World leader in CRM software with 50% market share
• 200+ products• 139 offices in 40 countries
2001
Part 1
![Page 5: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
What is CRM?
Customer Relationship Management System
Part 1
![Page 6: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
HOW DID SIEBEL GAIN LEADERSHIP STATUS?
Part 2
![Page 7: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
1. Customisation of product
• Among 400 players in the sales force automation space
• Extended services beyond electronic contact management
• Customised product according to customer requirements
Part 2
![Page 8: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Result
Gartner’s CRM Top 10 Magic Quadrant (2002)
Part 2
Niche Player Visionaries
LeaderChallenger
PeopleSoft
SAP
Completeness of Vision
Ab
ilit
y to
Exe
cute
Interact Commerce Firepond
PivotalOnyx
J.D. EdwardsEpiphany
![Page 9: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
2. Value-added services
Multichannel approach:• Retail outlets• Kiosks at trade shows• Internet• Call centres
Part 2
![Page 10: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Result
• Increase of over 20% in their customers’ average satisfaction levels,
• Increase of over 19% in their employees’ productivity levels, and
• Increase of 16% in customer retention (98% of customers ready to buy again from Siebel)
![Page 11: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Focus on Consumer Satisfaction
American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI):• Companies with top
50% ACSI scores generated ~ $42 bn in shareholder wealth
• Companies with bottom 50% of scores created only ~ $23 bn
• 1 ACSI = market value of $898 mnA 1% increase in customer satisfaction =
a 3% increase in market capitalization
Part 2
![Page 12: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
3. Consumer value-add
• Did not attempt to capture value from each component
• Only 16% of client’s CRM investment went to Siebel
Part 2
![Page 13: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Result
• 729 partners by 2001– Integration alliance partners:
Accenture, CapGemini, Ernst & Young– Hardware & Software partners: Alcatel,
Avaya, Compaq, AT&T Wireless
Part 2
![Page 14: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
THE SITUATIONPart 3
![Page 15: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Gregg Carman’s Dilemma
• $2.1 mn sale to Quick & Reilly (Q&R)• FleetBoston – recently acquired Q&R –
wanted to veto the sale• Should Carman sell the product to Q&R
or stand by FleetBoston’s wishes?
Decides to go ahead and make the sale
Part 3
![Page 16: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Quick & Reilly: A Background
• A discount-broker• 1996: Cathy Ridley (VP Marketing)
wanted to introduce sales force automation in 1996 – to track 100 offices, 500 brokers & 1 mn customers
• 1997: Q&R got acquired by FleetBoston• 1998: Met Gregg Carman to consider the
possibility of implementing Siebel’s customised solution
![Page 17: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
QUESTIONS, ANALYSIS & SUMMARY
Part 4
Part 4
![Page 18: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Question 1
How should Carman respond to the invitation to tell the Quick & Reilly executives what he thought of Oracle?
Part 4
His response to Cathy Ridley is appropriate
1) He does not undercut Oracle2) He launches into a demonstration of Siebel’s solutions
What else could he have done?
a) Provided Cathy literature of Siebel’s productsb) Walked her through the various stages of product
implementation and showcased Siebel’s end-to-end solution provision
![Page 19: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Question 1
What features of this particular interaction influence your opinion?
1) Carman has no information about the client requirements or budget
2) Oracle is among Siebel’s leading competitors, so bringing Oracle into focus may not be a good idea
3) Cathy Ridley is a knowledgeable customer4) Carman is not comfortable directly comparing
Siebel to Oracle without prior information on the customer’s requirements
Part 4
![Page 20: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Question 1
Would your opinion of the right response change if the circumstances were different?
1) Carman has full information about Q&R’s requirements and budget
2) Cathy Ridley is not very knowledgeable
Part 4
Carman should push to sell Siebel over Oracle because he knows exactly what the customer wants
Carman should stick to his original response, since Cathy would otherwise not appreciate the differences between Siebel and Oracle
![Page 21: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Question 2
How should Carman qualify the prospect?
“HOT”
Q&R is in the market actively shopping for sales force automation systems. If Carman can address Q&R’s requirements, he will quickly and successfully be able to convert the sale.
Part 4
![Page 22: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Question 2
Should he ask, “What’s your budget?”
YES.
The information (Pre-approach stage) Carman gathers will determine his strategy when he sells to Q&R executives.
Part 4
![Page 23: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Question 2
Should he suppress his curiosity and leave it to the prospect to bring up information about the size and timing of the opportunity?
NO.
The prospect may not bring up the information at all in which case the opportunity will be lost.
Part 4
![Page 24: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Question 2
If he asks for information, how will he use it?
Sell the product to the powerful buyer, i.e. Q&R top management (“the right set of executives”)
Part 4
![Page 25: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Question 3
Evaluate Carman’s interactions with the customer up to this point. Is he doing a good job?
Prospecting & Qualifying
Pre-approach
Presentation & Demonstration
Overcoming Objections
Closing
Follow up & Maintenance
Identified Cathy Ridley
(Q&R) as a prospect
Information gathering to understand
requirements
Demonstrates Siebel’s product at the trade
show
Q&R raises “objection”
by mentioning
Oracle
Will close sale after
meeting the decision makers
Siebel’s USP – ensuring customer
satisfaction
Carman is doing a good job so far
Part 4
![Page 26: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Question 3
How effective is Siebel Systems’ approach?
Follows a Targeted Account Selling (TAS) Process
Assess the Opportunity
Define the competitive Strategy
Develop the Relationship Strategy
Turn Ideas into Action
Test and Improve the Plan
Part 4
1
2
3
4
5
![Page 27: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Step 1: Assess the Opportunity
Is there an opportunity?
$2mn sale to Q&R
Can we compete?
Yes, only company offering end-to-end
solutions
Can we win?Yes, market leader
Is it worth winning?
Yes, large sale
Part 4
![Page 28: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Step 2: Define the Competitive Strategy
Compelling event and can compete to win
Marketing strategy: Flanking attack
1. The market is segmented2. There are some segments that are not well served by
the existing competitors3. Oracle has relatively strong resources and is well able
to withstand a head-on attack4. Siebel has moderately strong resources, enough to
successfully defend several niches
Part 4
![Page 29: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Step 3: Develop the Relationship Strategy
• Key players: Cathy Ridley, senior executives
• Powerful buyers: top management to whom the final sale has to be made
• Current status: still assessing the situation
• Relationship strategy: need to built a long-term relationship
Cathy Ridley(VP Marketing)
Part 4
![Page 30: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Step 4: Turn Ideas into Action
Market leader in CRM Systems
Pre-approach stage
Only provider of end-to-end solutions
Gather information on customer requirementsCustomer value addition and satisfaction, customised products, long-term relationships
Part 4
![Page 31: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Step 5: Test and Improve the Plan
Will come into play once the selling plan is implemented
Understand the Plan
Test the Plan
Improve the Plan
Part 4
![Page 32: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Summary
The TAS process is effective because Siebel:
1. Follows a market-driven approach (delivers superior customer value through complete solutions which is hard to replicate)
2. Gathers information and better understands customer requirements to deliver a customised product
3. Creates strategies keeping in mind counter strategies which competition might adopt
Part 4
![Page 33: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
References
B. Fryer (2001), “High Tech the Old Fashioned Way,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79, 3(March), 99-125.
C. Fornell (2001), “The Science of Satisfaction,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 79, 3(March), 120-121.
Siebel Systems: Anatomy of a Sale Part 2 (HBS Case 9-503-022)
![Page 34: Group P_Siebel Systems](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062404/551e5930497959e4398b4855/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Thank you