Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK...

48
Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013 Huatulco

Transcript of Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK...

Page 1: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Good at listening or good at listening tests?

Dr John FieldCRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK

Faculty of Education, Cambridge University

ANUPI 2013 Huatulco

Page 2: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

With thanks to Oxford University Press for supporting

this talk as part of their Professional Development

programme

Page 3: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Professional Development3

Building bridges: research into practice

• Action research

Teacher investigates own practice

• Academic research into ELT / SLA

Methodology

Learner performance / development

• Applying research from other domains

General education – Discourse analysis – pragmatics Sociology – Psycholinguistics – Social psychology

Phonetics and phonology – vocabulary studies

Page 4: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Professional Development4

Building bridges: research into practice

• Action research

Teacher investigates own practice

• Academic research into ELT / SLA

Methodology

Learner performance / development

• Applying research from other domains

General education – Discourse analysis – pragmatics Sociology – Psycholinguistics –Social psychology

Phonetics and phonology – vocabulary studies

Page 5: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Professional Development5

Good at listening or …?

• A cognitive approach to testing listening• What learners tell us about listening tests• What is listening?• Recent developments in the testing of L2

listening

Page 6: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

A cognitive approach

Page 7: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Professional Development7

Listening: where teaching and testing merge

Listening is a process taking place in the mind of the listener.

The only way we can find out if understanding has occurred

is indirectly, by asking questions.

This applies to checking understanding in the classroom as well as to designing tests.

So what follows has implications for teachers as well as testers.

Page 8: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

The need for a cognitive approach

• There is a new interest among testers in what goes on in the mind of the test taker.

• We need to know whether high-stakes test actually test what they claim to test. Can a listening test, for example, accurately predict the ability of a test taker to study at an English medium university? Work in the health service? Survive as an immigrant?

• At a local level, we need to use tests to diagnose learner problems so that the tests can feed into learning. This is especially true of listening.

Page 9: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Cognitive validity asks…

• Does a test elicit from test takers the kind of process that they would use in a real-world context? In the case of listening, are we testing the kinds of process that listeners would actually use ?

• Or do the recordings and formats that we use lead test takers to behave differently from the way they would in real life?

Page 10: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Two possible research approaches

• A. Ask learners to report on the processes they adopted when taking a test (e.g. by explaining how they got their answers)

• B. Use a model of listening that is supported by evidence from psychology. Match the processes produced by a test against the model.

Page 11: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Listening to listeners

Page 12: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Professional Development12

Listening and reporting

• A listening passage is paused after about every third (every 70 secs out of 3.5 mins.).

• Learners report their answers for this section• Learner explain why they gave the answer.• After a short piece of listening, learners’ recall is fresh and

accurate.• Answers serve as triggers to memory.

Page 13: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Professional Development13

What learners tell us 1

1

You will hear a talk by a man called Tom about the advantages and disadvantages of golf courses.

• Question 13:Tom suggests that golf courses could also be used as ………..

(Source Cambridge CAE: past test)•

Page 14: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Professional Development14

What learners tell us 1 Question: Tom suggests that golf courses could also be used as NATURE RESERVES’

• (30) S: number 13 is I’m not sure but um + he said ‘crack’• R: you heard the word ‘crack’?• S: crack …but I don’t know the meaning of ‘crack’• R: er you know it seemed to be an important word• S: yes I think so• R: ok + how did you spell ‘crack’ if if you don’t know the • S: c-r-a-c-k• R: right so you guessed the spelling did you?• S: I guess yes

• Most importantly, courses should be designed to attract rather than drive away wildlife.

Page 15: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Professional Development15

Conclusion: learner behaviour

• Learners sometimes simply listen out for prominent words – even if they do not understand them.

• This is partly a reflection of their level. At level B1 and below, listeners are very dependent upon picking up salient words rather than chunks or whole utterances.

• But this tendency is increased by the use of gap filling tasks, which focus attention at word level.

Page 16: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Professional Development 16

What learners tell us 2

• R: is there anything that you heard that helped you?• S: I have the problem about that because I am concentrate

on the two of the questions so …I didn’t realise• R: so• S: his his + he’s already go to the 9• R: right ok so you were still listening out for number 8• S: yeah and number 7• R: so that’s why you missed number 9• S: yes actually it’s a lot of problem about how to know where

he’s talking

Page 17: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Drawbacks

• It is common practice to pre-set questions so as to ensure focused listening. Most conventional methods anticipate in writing information that is going to occur in the recording.

• Learners form predictions which may shape their listening• It is a convention that questions follow the same order as

the recording• Learners often listen out for an answer to Q1; miss it and

as a result miss the answer to Q2 as well

Page 18: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

18

What a conventional set of test items provides for free

The items in (e.g.) a gap-filling task potentially provide a candidate with:

• A summary of what the recording covers• A set of gapped sentences that follow the sequence of the

recording• Key words with which to locate information• Sequences which may echo the wording of the recording

or the order of words

Page 19: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

What is listening?

Page 20: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Professional Development20

Expert listening (Field 2008)

Meaning

Speech signal

Words

20

Decoding

Word search

Parsing

Meaning construction

Discourse construction

Page 21: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Professional Development for IATEFL 201321

How close to real–life input?

and the recording

Decoding

Word search

Parsing

Page 22: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

The recording (vs real-world input)

• Scripted (even semi-authentic) recordings bear little resemblance to natural everyday English

• Actors mark commas and full stops• There are no hesitations and false starts • Utterances are quite long and regular in rhythm• Voices do not overlap• Test setters sometimes put in distractors – making the

recording much more informationally dense than a natural piece of speech would be.

Page 23: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Extending listening practice

It is critical to maximise the exposure of learners to spoken L2 sources – ideally authentic ones

Thanks to the internet, there is now a wide range of potential L2 listening materials which can be downloaded and disseminated in MP3 form for:

• Classroom practice• Listening homework• Self-study at home• Study centres• Listening for pleasure

Page 24: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Professional Development24

How close to a real–life task?

and the task

Decoding

Word search

Parsing

Page 25: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Evaluating a task: multiple choice

You hear an explorer talking about a journey he’s making. How will he travel once he is across the river?

A. by motor vehicle B. on horseback C. on foot

(FCE Handbook, 2008: 60)

Page 26: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Recording 1 (FCE Sample Test 1:1)

• The engine’s full of water at the moment, it’s very doubtful if any of the trucks can get across the river in this weather. The alternative is to carry all the stuff across using the old footbridge, which is perfectly possible …and then use horses rather than trucks for the rest of the trip all the way instead of just the last 10 or 15 kilometres as was our original intention. We can always pick up the vehicles again on the way down…

Page 27: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Recording 1 (FCE Sample Test 1:1)

• The engine’s full of water at the moment, it’s very doubtful if any of the trucks can get across the river in this weather. The alternative is to carry all the stuff across using the old footbridge, which is perfectly possible …and then use horses rather than trucks for the rest of the trip all the way instead of just the last 10 or 15 kilometres as was our original intention. We can always pick up the vehicles again on the way down…

Page 28: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Conclusion

Conventional formats require the listener to:• Map from written information to spoken• Eliminate negative possibilities as well as identify positive

ones (esp with MCQ and T/F)• Read and write as well as listen (esp gap filling)• Engage in complex logistical tasks which take us well

beyond listening (esp. multiple matching)

Page 29: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Some solutions

• Provide items after a first playing of the recording and before a second. This ensures more natural listening, without preconceptions or advance information other than general context.

• Keep items short. Loading difficulty on to items (especially MCQ ones) just biases the test in favour of reading rather than listening.

• Items should not echo words in the recording• Some tasks (e.g. multiple matching) allow items to ignore

the order of the recording and to focus on global meaning rather than local detail.

Page 30: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

The listening / reading conflict

• It is important to ensure that a task really practises listening and is not too dependent upon reading.

• Visual tasks avoid the problem – but are limited in the complexity of what they can show

• Multiple-choice questions make very heavy reading demands. The learner needs to discriminate finely between options and to hold the options n the mind.

• Gap filling makes multiple demands – reading, writing and listening.

• Solution: Keep questions short or rely on oral questions.

Page 31: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Reducing the reading load (Oxford Test of English B level)

Prices and time

0 Tickets cost A £6.50 B £8.50 C £10.50

1 The trip is on A Friday B Saturday C Sunday

2 The coach leaves school at A 8.30 B 9.30 C 11.30

At the film studio

3 We’ll see actors performing in A a comedy B a drama C a thriller

4 We’ll have the chance to

A use the cameras B talk to actors C try on clothes

5 Visitors can’t take into the studios

A bags B phones C sandwiches

Page 32: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Professional Development32

Does a given test represent all levels of listening?

Meaning

Speech signal

Words

32

Decoding

Word search

Parsing

Meaning construction

Discourse construction

Page 33: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Professional Development for IATEFL 201333

Higher levels of listening

• Meaning construction (= context).• Take a bare fact and relate it to what was said before• Interpret the attitude or intentions of the speaker• Bring in world knowledge or knowledge of the speaker

• Discourse construction• Link pieces of information together• Identify main and minor points• Report the line of argument or overall main point

Page 34: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

TargetsAn item in a test can target any of these levels:• Decoding:

She caught the (a) 9.15 (b) 9.50 (c) 5.15 (d) 5.50 train.• Lexical search:

She went to London by …….• Factual information:

Where did she go and how?• Meaning construction:

Was she keen on going by train?• Discourse construction.

What was the main point made by the speaker?

Page 35: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Targeting levels of listening

• In theory, a good test should target all levels of listening in order to provide a complete picture of the test taker’s command of all the relevant processes.

• In practice, higher levels of listening may be too demanding in the early stages of L2 study. Novice listeners focus quite heavily on word-level decoding, which does not leave them enough spare attention to give to wider meaning. It is therefore appropriate to focus mainly on factual information.

Page 36: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Question focus

Test formats often focus narrowly on one level of listening.– Gap-filling items tend to focus on word recognition– Items in other task types tend to focus on facts.

• At higher levels of L2 knowledge, questions rarely tap into more complex levels of listening:– What are the speaker’s intentions or attitude?– What is the overall main point or points?– What is the line of argument that links the facts?– What can we infer that the speaker did not say?– What will the speaker go on to say?

Page 37: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Spread of targets

Page 38: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

The inflexibility of high stakes tests

Large scale high-stakes tests have major constraints which prevent them from testing listening in a way that fully represents the skill.– Reliability and ease of marking– Highly controlled test methods, using traditional

formats that the candidate knows– Little attention possible to individual variation or

alternative answers

Page 39: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Solutions for local testers

Ask questions at discourse level:• What is the main point of the recording? / Give three main

points.• What is the connection between Point A and Point B?• Complete a skeleton summary of the text with main points

and sub-points

Ask learners to compare two recordings for similarities and differences

Ask learners to summarise a recording orally or in the form of notes (in L1 or L2)

Page 40: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Recent developments in the testing of L2 listening

Page 41: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Middle and low-stakes tests

• Test providers have recently begin to offer middle- and low-stakes tests. These tests can be much more flexible because they are not bound by some of the limitations of high-stakes tests.

• They can be used as– Entry tests– Progress tests– End of course tests– Professional selection tests– Diagnostic tests (useful in listening)

Page 42: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

OTE Level B listening specifications

1 5 short monologues 5 MCQ visual Specific information

2 Longer monologue Note completion 5 MCQ items 3 option

Specificinformation

3 Longer dialogue(speaker opinion)

5 MM items 3 option

Stated opinionimplied meaning

4 5 short monologues / dialogues

5 MCQ items 3 option

attitude/feeling/opiniongistfunction/reason/purposespeaker relationshiptopictype/genre

Page 43: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Oxford Test of English - multiple matching: opinion

You will hear two students talking about a local history project they are doing at college. Match the opinion to the person who says it. Choose the correct answer (the woman, the man, or both) for each statement (1–5). There is one example (0).

• 0 It would be a good idea to check the research topics with the teacher.

• 1 The project will be improved by researching what local people did in the past.

• 2 Preparing questions for the interviews will be useful.• 3 It is advisable to interview some extra people.• 4 The best people to interview are family members.• 5 People who are interviewed should get a copy of the project.

Page 44: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Advantages of this kind of task

• Items do not need to follow the order of the recording• Items can test opinion – main point – fact – inference etc• Items minimise the reading load.

Page 45: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Meaning level questions (OTE B Level)

• 1. A man and a woman are talking about a concert they have just seen. What did the woman think of the concert?

• A The music was too loud. B The tickets were too expensive. C The stage was too far away.

• 2. A woman and her son are in a newsagent’s at the airport. Which magazine do they choose?

• A a football magazine B a computer magazine C a politics magazine• 3. Two friends are talking on the phone. What is the man’s job?• A a receptionist B a chef C a waiter• 4 A man is leaving a voicemail message for his friend. Why?• A to complain B to apologize C to suggest something • 5. Two friends are talking about a new computer game. What is the boy’s

opinion of the game?• A. Not good value. B Not challenging. Not original.

Page 46: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Computer delivery

Many test boards offer computer delivered versions of their tests. Unfortunately, they do not always take advantage of the new possibilities that computer delivery offers. In the case of listening, these include:

• Improved audio perception through individual headphones• The possibility of delivering the questions after the first

listening. This means that the first listening is much more natural and not unduly influenced by seeking answers.

• Thanks to an adaptive algorithm, the level of each question presented to the test taker can be based on their success in answering the previous question, so most questions are pitched at the approximate ability of the test taker.

Page 47: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

References

• Field, J. (2008) Listening in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: CUP

• Field, J. (2009). The cognitive validity of the lecture listening section of the IELTS listening paper. IELTS Research Reports 9, Cambridge

• Field, J. (2013) Cognitive validity. In Geranpayeh, A. & Taylor, L. (eds.) Examining Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

• Oxford Test of English: https://elt.oup.com/feature/global/ote

Page 48: Good at listening or good at listening tests? Dr John Field CRELLA, University of Bedfordshire, UK Faculty of Education, Cambridge University ANUPI 2013.

Thanks for listening!

[email protected]