Going Virtual! 2010

27
Introductions

Transcript of Going Virtual! 2010

Page 2: Going Virtual! 2010

Lisa Dawley, Ph.D.Professor and Chair

Kerry Rice, Ed.D.Assistant Professor and Associate Chair

Going Virtual! 2010The Status of Professional Development and Unique Needs of K-12 Online Teachers

http://ow.ly/3aHwu

Page 3: Going Virtual! 2010

Going Virtual! Research Series

• Who delivered/received PD? • When and how PD was delivered? • Content and sequence of PD?

2007: The Status of Professional Development

• Amount of PD?• Preferred delivery format?• Most important topics for PD?

2008: Unique Needs and Challenges

• Program evaluations• Complexities of measuring “effectiveness”

2009: Effective Professional Development of K-12 Online Teachers

• Revisit questions from 2007 & 2008 • What PD have you had? What do you need?

2010: The Status of Professional Development and Unique Needs of K12 Online Teachers

Page 5: Going Virtual! 2010

Going Virtual! Research SeriesPh

ase

I: 20

07

258 Respondents•167 K-12 online teachers•61 Administrators•14 TrainersOver 40 virtual schools and online programsOver 30 states

Phas

e II:

200

8 884 K-12 Online Teachers•727 virtual schools•99 supplemental programs•54 brick and mortar online

programsOver 60 virtual schools and online programsOver 30 states

Phas

e III

: 200

9 2 Programs•1 Virtual Charter•1 Supplemental Program

Goi

ng V

irtua

l: 20

10

830 K-12 Online Teachers417 Virtual School318 Supplemental81 Blended12 Brick N MortarOver 50 virtual schools and online programsOver 40 states & 24 countries

Des

crip

tive

Eval

uativ

e

Page 6: Going Virtual! 2010

Demographics

• Teachers highly experienced– 99% credentialed– 60% Master’s degree+

• 12% of new online teachers have never taught f-2-f

• Boundaries are blurring

Page 7: Going Virtual! 2010

PD in Online Instruction

• 25% of brand new online teachers received no training

• Most common type:– ongoing training (81%)– workshops (77%)

• Who provides?– workplace (94%)– university (30%)

• University training– 43% of teachers with

6+ years experience– 12% of brand new

teachers

Page 8: Going Virtual! 2010

Preferred PD

• #1 Fully online facilitated (53%)

• #2 Workshops (49%)

• Grad courses appeal to teachers with 0-10 years experience (30-39%)

• Grad courses least appeal to teachers with 10+ years experience (56%).

Page 9: Going Virtual! 2010

Personal Learning Networks

• #1 Facebook for personal learning (n=29)• 52% received training in use of social networks

for PD• 25% want additional training in the use of

social networks to support personal learning

Page 11: Going Virtual! 2010

Comments?

Page 12: Going Virtual! 2010

Topics Covered in PD

Highest rated, current:• 93% LMS training• 90% Communication

technologies• 86% field of online

teaching

Highest rated, needed:• Foundations: Psychology

of online learning, 44%• Facilitation: Meeting

needs of students with disabilities, 64%

• Design: Design tools, 40%• Design: Instructional

design, 43%

Page 13: Going Virtual! 2010

Foundations

Page 14: Going Virtual! 2010

Facilitation Strategies

Page 15: Going Virtual! 2010

TechnologyTools

Page 16: Going Virtual! 2010

Online Design

Page 17: Going Virtual! 2010

Etiquette, Behavior & Assessment

Page 18: Going Virtual! 2010

Comments on training topics?

Page 19: Going Virtual! 2010

Training Needs

• Brand new online teachers– Working with students with disabilities in the

online classroom (57%) – Managing groups and online collaboration (52%)– Instructional design of online learning (53%)

Page 20: Going Virtual! 2010

Training Needs

• 1-5 Years Online Teaching Experience– The area of design, including instructional design

principles (46%) – Design tools (41%) – Design of syllabi (38%)

Page 21: Going Virtual! 2010

Training Needs

• 6+ Years of Online Teaching Experience– Psychology of online learning (41%) – Promoting student autonomy (35%) – Student readiness (34%)

Page 22: Going Virtual! 2010

Research Issues

• Perceived researcher conflict of interest – scoping out market opportunities

“This survey was annoying--long, unnecessarily vague, complicated and obviously self-serving.”

• Online teachers are tired of being surveyed?• Using data mining to support effectiveness

measures

Page 23: Going Virtual! 2010

Program Evaluation

Teacher Effectiveness

Highly qualified?

Parent Satisfaction

Annual Performance

Range of implementation

Student Satisfaction

Knowledge of STS

Workshop Effectiveness

Quality

Usefulness

Engagement

Page 24: Going Virtual! 2010

Pass Rate Predictive Model

• Decision Tree Analysis– Improved grades (from 88% to 92%) when participants’

logged into LMS more than 10 times over six weeks. The average is further improved to 98% when frequency of logins increased to 17 times.

Page 25: Going Virtual! 2010

Engagement

• Clustering– More time spent online = more time spent offline.– Previous online teaching experience = more hours spent

both online and offline.

Page 26: Going Virtual! 2010

TeacherStream

Page 27: Going Virtual! 2010

Comments?