Glycan specificity of P[19] rotavirus and comparison with those of ...
Transcript of Glycan specificity of P[19] rotavirus and comparison with those of ...
1
Glycan specificity of P[19] rotavirus and comparison with those of other related P 1
genotypes 2
Yang Liu1, Theresa A. Ramelot2, Pengwei Huang1, Yan Liu3, Zhen Li3, Ten Feizi3, 3
Weiming Zhong1, Fang-Tzy Wu4, Ming Tan1,5, Michael A. Kennedy2 and Xi Jiang1,5* 4
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 5
Cincinnati, OH 6
2Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Miami University, Oxford, OH 7
3Glycosciences Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, 8
UK 9
4Center for Research, Diagnostics and Vaccine Development, Centers for Disease 10
Control, Taipei, Taiwan 11
5Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 12
13
*Corresponding author 14
Email: [email protected] 15
16
Short title: Glycan binding specificity of P[19] rotavirus 17
JVI Accepted Manuscript Posted Online 24 August 2016J. Virol. doi:10.1128/JVI.01494-16Copyright © 2016 Liu et al.This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
2
Abstract 18
The P[19] genotype belongs to the P[II] genogroup of group A rotaviruses (RVs). 19
However, unlike the other P[II] RVs that mainly infects humans, P[19] RVs commonly 20
infect animals (porcine), making P[19] unique to study RV diversity and host ranges. 21
Through in vitro binding assays and saturation transfer difference (STD) NMR, we found 22
that P[19] could bind mucin cores 2, 4, and 6, as well as type 1 histo-blood group 23
antigens (HBGAs). The common sequences of these glycans serve as minimal binding 24
units, while additional residues, such as the A, B, H, and Lewis epitopes of the type 1 25
HBGAs, can further define the binding outcomes and therefore, likely the host ranges 26
for P[19] RVs. This complex binding property of P[19] is shared with those of the other 27
three P[II] RVs (P[4], P[6] and P[8]) in that all of them recognized the type 1 HBGA 28
precursor, although P[4] and P[8], but not P[6], also bind to mucin cores. Moreover, 29
while essential for P[4] and P[8] binding, the addition of the Lewis epitope blocked P[6] 30
and P[19] binding to type 1 HBGAs. Chemical shift NMR of P[19] VP8* identified a 31
ligand binding interface that has shifted away from the known RV P-genotype binding 32
sites but is conserved among all P[II] RVs and two P[I] RVs (P[10] and P[12]), 33
suggesting an evolutionary connection among these human and animal RVs. Taken 34
together, these data are important for hypotheses on potential mechanisms for RV 35
diversity, host ranges, and cross-species transmission. 36
Importance 37
In this study, we found that this P[19] strain and other P[II] RVs recognize mucin cores 38
and the type 1 HBGA precursors as the minimal functional units and that additional 39
saccharides adjacent to these units can alter binding outcomes and thereby possibly 40
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
3
host ranges. These data may help to explain why some P[II] RVs, such as P[6] and 41
P[19], commonly infect animals but rarely humans, while others, such as the P[4] and 42
P[8] RVs, mainly infect humans and are predominant over other P genotypes. 43
Elucidation of the molecular bases for strain-specific host ranges and cross-species 44
transmission of these human and animal RVs is important to understand RV 45
epidemiology and disease burden, which may impact development of control and 46
prevention strategies against RV gastroenteritis. 47
Introduction 48
Rotaviruses (RVs) are the principal cause of severe diarrhea in children, responsible for 49
approximately 200,000 deaths in children younger than 5 years old worldwide in 2011 50
(1-3). It has been shown that RV attachment to cell surface carbohydrates, mediated by 51
the VP8* domain of the VP4 spike protein, is the important first step for successful 52
infection (4-7). RVs are diverse in recognizing different receptors, causing infections in 53
humans and different animal species. For example, early studies showed that infection 54
with some animal RVs relies on the terminal sialic acid (SA) and are sialidase-sensitive, 55
but the majority of human and animal RVs are sialidase-insensitive (8-12). However, a 56
recent study indicated that a sialidase-insensitive human RV, Wa (P[8]), recognizes an 57
internal SA residue (13). In addition, other host cell surface molecules, such as the heat 58
shock cognate protein 70 (14-16) and integrins (17-19), have been identified as 59
potential RV receptors, although their precise roles in RV attachment, penetration, and 60
pathogenesis in host cells remain elusive. 61
The recent findings that almost all major RV genotypes in the P[II]-P[IV] genogroups 62
infect humans and recognize HBGAs (20-27) have led to a plausible hypothesis that 63
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
4
HBGAs are important host factors or cellular receptors for human RVs. Direct evidence 64
for HBGA-RV interaction has been obtained by resolving the VP8* protein crystal 65
structures for two human RVs (P[14] and P[11]) in complex with their HBGA 66
oligosaccharide ligands (21, 22). The association between RV infection and a child’s 67
secretor status has also been observed through epidemiologic studies (28-31). 68
Together, these findings suggest that HBGAs play important roles in RV infection and 69
pathogenesis. 70
Although direct co-crystal data remain lacking, recognition of HBGAs by the most 71
prevalent human rotavirus genotypes of P[4], P[6] and P[8] has been reported by in vitro 72
binding assays. For example, the VP8*s of the human P[8] and P[4] RVs recognize the 73
Lewis b and H-type 1 HBGAs, while the P[6] RVs bind the H type 1 only (23). However, 74
a STD-NMR based study showed that while the human P[4] (strain DS-1) and P[6] 75
(strain RV-3) RV VP8* could bind the A-type HBGAs with the involvement of the α1-2 76
fucose, the VP8* of the P[8] human strain Wa did not recognize the A and the Lewis b/H 77
type 1 antigens (20). On the other hand, a binding study with a human milk glycan 78
library confirmed the binding of the P[6] (RV-3) VP8* to the terminal type 1 HBGA 79
sequences with or without the H epitope but without the Lewis epitope and an additional 80
internal Lewis x determinant (32). 81
The group A RVs are diverse and have been divided into 37 P genotypes (P[1] – P[37]) 82
in five P genogroups (P[I] – P[V]) based on sequences of the viral surface spike proteins 83
VP4 or VP8* (25, 33) (Fig 1). While the majority of RVs exclusively or nearly exclusively 84
infect either humans or particular animal species, others appear to commonly infect 85
both humans and animals (P[6], P[9], P[11], and P[14] in P[II]-P[IV]) or infect mainly 86
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
5
animals with occasional infection of both humans and animals (P[1], P[2], P[3], P[7], 87
P[10], and P[28] in P[I]) (Fig 1). Mechanisms for cross-species transmission have been 88
suggested for some RVs, such as the P[III] RVs that can infect both humans and 89
animals probably via recognition of the A antigens shared by humans and wild and 90
domestic animals (25). In addition, the P[11] RVs recognize HBGA precursors or 91
backbones whose chain length and branching are developmentally controlled in 92
neonates and young infants (24, 26). These carbohydrates are evolutionarily conserved 93
between humans and some animals. However, the reasons behind P[1], P[2], P[3], P[7], 94
P[10], and P[28] RVs infection in animals or occasionally both human and animals 95
remain unknown, limiting our understanding of RV epidemiology and thus, the ability to 96
develop rational prevention strategies. 97
In this study, we characterized a P[19] RV that commonly infects animals (porcine), but 98
rarely humans (Fig.1). A unique binding property to the di-saccharide core structure 99
(GlcNAcβ1-6GalNAc) of mucin cores 2, 4, and 6 and the extended terminal type 1 100
HBGA tri-saccharide (Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3Gal) was identified for an overlapping binding 101
interface. This P[19] RV binding interface differed from known ones but appeared to be 102
conserved among P[II] RVs and two P[I] RVs (P[10] and P[12]) (Fig.1). Additional 103
saccharides surrounding the core sequences also impact the glycan binding specificities 104
for these RVs. This may explain the observed diversity in binding specificity, host 105
ranges, and possibly pathogenicity of RVs in different human populations and animal 106
species. 107
Materials and Methods 108
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
6
Expression and purification of VP8* proteins in E. Coli. The VP8* sequences 109
(amino acids 46-231) from a human RV P[19] (GenBank accession number: 110
DQ887060) was expressed in E. coli BL21 and purified by GST-tag affinity purification, 111
as described previously (25). Recombinant VP8* proteins of other P[II] RVs (P[4], P[6] 112
and P[8]) and a P[10] RVs were also purified using the same expression system. 15N- or 113
15N,13C-labeled P[19] VP8* proteins were also made for the NMR studies using the 114
same E. coli culture procedures with the addition of 15N-minimal growth medium (22 mM 115
KH2PO4, 50 mM Na2HPO4, 8.5 Mm NaCl, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgSO4, 1x BME 116
vitamins, 18 mM 15NH4Cl, and 22 mM Glucose) or 15N,13C-minimal growth medium 117
supplied with 22 mM 13C-Glucose (20). The GST tag of the labeled VP8* proteins was 118
removed for the NMR study by cutting with thrombin (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO) 119
followed by FPLC gel filtration to collect the VP8* protein fractions and concentrated by 120
ultracentrifugation. The purified VP8* proteins were stored at -80 oC until needed. 121
Binding of P[19] VP8* to human saliva, human milk, and porcine mucins. A set of 122
previously characterized adult saliva samples with known ABO, secretor, and Lewis 123
phenotypes were used in binding assays with the GST-VP8* fusion proteins (23). In 124
addition, a set of saliva samples from neonates and young infants at different ages in 125
the first year of lives described in a previous study (24) was studied for age-specific host 126
ranges of P[6] RVs. A pooled human milk sample from the Cincinnati human milk bank 127
(34) and a commercial porcine mucin (Sigma) were also tested for binding to P[19] 128
VP8*. The carbohydrate profiles for the human milk and porcine mucin have been 129
determined in our previous studies (25, 34). 130
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
7
Glycan array screening and ELISA-based oligosaccharide binding assay. Initial 131
ligand screenings for P[19] VP8* was performed by the Protein-Glycan Interaction Core 132
of CFG (Consortium for Functional Glycomics) (The glycan library information was 133
available from the website http://www.functionalglycomics.org/). The recombinant GST-134
VP8* proteins were applied to individual glycan arrays at a protein concentration of 200 135
µg/ml and the bound GST-VP8* were detected using a fluorescent-labeled anti-GST 136
monoclonal antibody. Relative fluorescent units (RFU) of each glycan were calculated to 137
rank the reactivity in the interaction with P[19] VP8*. A further microarray analysis was 138
performed at the carbohydrate microarray facility of the Glycosciences Laboratory at the 139
Imperial College, London, the United Kingdom, using a focused array of sequence-140
defined glycan probes arrayed as lipid-linked probes (35). The probes are prepared 141
from reducing oligosaccharides by reductive amination with the amino lipid, 1,2-142
dihexadecyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine, designated DH. The P[19] VP8* was 143
overlaid at 50 µg/ml, followed by rabbit anti-GST antibody Z-5 (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX), 144
and biotinylated anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma). Binding was detected with Alexa Fluor-647-145
labelled streptavidin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). The probes have been described 146
previously (36, 37) except for DFiLNO, a difucosylated decasaccharide received from 147
Dextra as an unknown impurity of TFiLNO (1-2,-2,-3) and characterized by ES-CID-148
MS/MS (W Chai, unpublished). 149
The ELISA-based oligosaccharide binding assays were carried out as previously 150
described (38). Oligosaccharides used in the study included biotin-labeled PAA-151
conjugates obtained from CFG and Glycotech (GlycoTech, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD), and 152
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
8
biotin-labeled BSA conjugates of A, B, and H type 1 to type 4, kindly provided by Dr. 153
Todd L. Lowary. 154
Two-dimensional heteronuclear single quantum correlation (1H-15N-HSQC) NMR 155
experiments. Titrations of P[19] VP8* with mucin core 2 (kindly provided by Dr. James 156
Paulson) and LNFPI (V-lab) were followed by in 1H-15N-HSQC experiments and used to 157
calculate solution dissociation constants (KD values) for binding of the two ligands to 158
P[19] VP8*. The KD values were defined as KD =[VP8*][Ligand]/[VP8*-Ligand], where 159
[VP8*-Ligand] refers to the concentration of the complex of VP8* and the glycan ligand, 160
and [VP8*] and [Ligand] are the concentrations of free protein and ligand. NMR data 161
were collected at 20 oC with samples of ~300 µL of Tris NMR buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 162
100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10% D2O, pH 8.0) in 5 mm Shigemi NMR tubes on a 600 163
MHz Bruker Avance III spectrometer. Samples of 0.25 mM 15N-labeled VP8* were 164
titrated with each ligand at 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 1.4, 1.9, 2.7, 4.3, and 6 mM, and 2-D 1H-165
15N-HSQC spectra were acquired after each titration step. Spectra were processed with 166
NMRPipe software (39) and analyzed with Sparky 167
(http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/home/sparky) . The weighted chemical shift change upon 168
titration was determined for 10 strongly affected backbone amide peaks that were not 169
overlapped according to the following formula for chemical shift change (CSC) (40) : 170
CSC= Σ {[(ΔδHN)
2 + (ΔδN/6.5)
2]}
1/2, ΔδH
N = δH
N
free - δHN
bound and, ΔδN = δNfree - δNbound, 171
where δNfree and δNbound are the amide 15N chemical shifts in the absence and presence 172
of ligand; δHN
free and δHN
bound are the backbone amide hydrogen chemical shifts, 173
respectively. The concentration of free ligand, [L-free], was determined by [L-free] = [L-174
total] - (1/f) × [P-total], where f is the fraction of VP8* in the bound state is CSC/CSC-175
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
9
max, and [L-total] and [P-total] are the total concentrations of ligand and protein at each 176
titration. The CSC-max and KDs were determined by fitting the CSC/CSC-max at each 177
ligand titration versus the [L-free] to the equation f = [L-free]/( KD +[L-free]), with the 178
variables CSC-max and KD. The [L-free] values were calculated with the updated CSC-179
max, and this process was repeated until there were no further changes. The error bars 180
for KD were determined based on the average and standard deviation of the 10 peaks 181
that had their CAC/CSC-max vs [L-free] plotted and fit to KD in the in the same way. 182
P[19] VP8* chemical shift assignments. In order to assign the backbone chemical 183
shifts, 2-D and 3-D NMR data were collected for ~300 µL of 1.1 mM 15N-13C-labeled 184
P[19] VP8* in Tris NMR buffer at 20 oC on 600 MHz Varian Inova, 600 MHz Bruker 185
Avance III, and 850 MHz Bruker Avance II NMR spectrometers equipped with 186
conventional 5-mm HCN probes. Backbone 1H, 13C, and 15N resonance assignments 187
were made using the PINE server and then corrected and completed manually based 188
on following 3-D spectra (41): HNCACB, CBCA(CO)NH, HNCO, HNCA, HN(CO)CA, 189
HN(CA)CO, HBHA(CO)NH, and 15N-edited NOESY-HSQC (τm = 100 ms). Backbone 190
assignments were 91% complete for residues 63-225, and only 5-10 HN cross peaks 191
could not be assigned. However, none of the unassigned peaks shifted in the titration 192
studies. 193
Ligand chemical shift assignments. Chemical shift assignments of mucin core 2 and 194
LNFPI were achieved by analysis of 2-D 1H-13C HSQC, HMBC, HSQC-TOCSY, 1H-1H 195
COSY, TOCSY, and NOESY, and 1-D 1H NMR experiments recorded at 20 oC and 196
referenced to internal TSP(20, 42). The NMR samples were 2 mM mucin core 2 in Tris 197
NMR buffer and 5 mM LNFPI in phosphate NMR buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, 100 198
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
10
mM NaCl, 10% D2O), both at pH 8.0. Chemical shift assignments for LNFPI were in 199
agreement with published values (43), although differences can be attributed to pH, 200
temperature, and referencing variations. 201
STD NMR experiments. All saturation transfer difference (STD) NMR spectra were 202
acquired in Shigemi Tubes (Shigemi, USA) with a Bruker 600 MHz Avance III 203
spectrometer at 10 oC using a conventional HCN probe and the TopSpin 3.1 pulse 204
sequence STDDIFFGG19.3. The NMR sample for mucin core 2 in complex with P[19] 205
VP8* was prepared with 200 uM protein and 6.0 mM ligand in a final volume of 300 μL 206
Tris NMR buffer. The LNFPI STD sample was prepared with 130 μM P[19] VP8* and 207
6.6 mM LNFPI in a final volume of 300 μL of phosphate NMR buffer. This results in total 208
protein-ligand ratios of 1:35 and 1:50, for the mucin core 2 and LNFPI samples, 209
respectively. The protein resonances were saturated at 0 ppm with a cascade of 40 210
Gaussian shaped pulses with duration of 50 ms resulting in a total saturation time of 2 211
sec. The off-resonance saturation was applied to 30 ppm and 1024 experiments were 212
acquired for each with a 5 sec recycle delay. A spin-lock filter with strength of 10 kHz 213
and duration of 100-200 ms was applied to suppress the broad protein resonance 214
signals, and Watergate 3-9-19 was used to suppress the residual water signal. The STD 215
spectra were obtained by subtracting the on-resonance spectrum from the off-216
resonance reference spectrum. STD amplification factors were determined by the 217
equation (Io - Isat) / Io, where Io and Isat are the intensity of the signals in the reference 218
and saturated spectra, respectively, and the normalized STD amplification percentage 219
was determined by dividing by the largest STD amplification factor for each ligand. The 220
protons with the largest STD amplification percentage along with data from the 2-D 221
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
11
STD-tocsy spectrum, which was used to resolve overlap from the 1D spectra, were 222
used to assign the binding epitopes. 223
Homology modeling of P[19] VP8* and site-directed mutagenesis. A homology 224
model of the P[19] VP8* protein was built based on the X-ray crystal structure of DS1 225
strain of RVs (PDB ID: 2AEN) as the template by SWISS-MODEL automated protein 226
structure homology-modelling server (http://swissmodel.expasy.org/). Mutant VP8* 227
proteins with single amino acid substitution were constructed from template wild type 228
VP8* constructs using the QuickChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, La 229
Jolla, CA). 230
Virus propagation, inhibition, and infectivity assays. A P[19] RV (G9P[19]) was 231
adapted from a positive stool sample obtained from Taiwan CDC collected on Dec.17, 232
2014 by multiple blind passages on the MA104 cells. The identity of the strain was 233
confirmed by RT-PCR and sequencing following detection of viral replication in the cell 234
culture by ELISA using Rotaclone kit (Meridian Bioscience, OH, USA). The cell-culture 235
adapted P[19] RVs were then used for inhibition assays with human milk, neonate 236
saliva, porcine mucin FPLC fractions as well as the oligosaccharides of LNFPI and 237
mucin core 2 using procedures described previously (24). In brief, the P[19] viruses (at 238
300 fluorescent forming units (FFU)/10 µl) were pre-incubated with different inhibition 239
reagents for 30 min. After rinsing twice with serum-free DMEM and chilling of all 240
reagents and the 24-well plates on ice, duplicated wells of confluent MA104 monolayer 241
were inoculated with the virus-oligosaccharide or virus-saliva/milk mixtures on ice with 242
continuous rocker platform agitation for 1 h. The inocula were then removed and the 243
cells were washed twice with ice-cold serum-free DMEM. The plates were then placed 244
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
12
back to the 37 oC incubator for 18 to 20 h prior to quantification of infected cells by 245
immunofluorescence with a rabbit anti-rotavirus antibody followed by a FITC-labelled 246
goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody. 247
248
Results 249
The P[19] VP8* binds human saliva, human milk, and porcine mucin. Our study 250
started with in vitro binding assays of P[19] VP8* to human milk, human saliva, and 251
porcine mucin for the detection of potential host receptor ligands. The P[19] VP8* 252
proteins bound the high molecular weight gel-filtration fractions of human milk and 253
porcine mucins (Fig.2a, 2b), as well as a group of human saliva samples with variable 254
binding profiles among saliva donors (Fig. 2c), indicating the existence of receptors or 255
ligands in these natural host glycan reservoirs. The binding pattern of the P[19] VP8* to 256
human saliva differed from the P[4], P[6], and P[8] RVs (23), where the P[19] VP8* 257
bound a low proportion of samples (12%) with no correlation to the ABH or Lewis types 258
of the saliva donors (Fig. 2c), suggesting that a unique, low-abundant carbohydrate may 259
be responsible for the low prevalence of P[19] in human populations. 260
P[19] VP8* recognizes mucin cores and the type 1 HBGA precursor. To define 261
specific carbohydrates recognized by P[19] VP8*, a glycan array analysis was 262
performed by the Consortium of Functional Glycomics (CFG) against a glycan library 263
containing 610 mammalian glycans. Binding signals arose for a group of glycans 264
containing the type 1 HBGAs and/or mucin cores 2, 4, and 6 (Fig. 3a). Further binding 265
assays with different HBGA- and mucin core-related glycans (Fig. 3b-f) confirmed the 266
glycan array results. For example, among the four types (types 1-4) of HBGAs tested, 267
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
13
the P[19] VP8* bound only the type 1 antigens (Fig. 3b-e). This result was further 268
confirmed by a focused neoglycolipid-based array with pair-wise comparisons of 269
oligosaccharide sequences that differed only in linkages between residues in each of 270
the type 1 (Galβ1-3GlcNAc) and type 2 (Galβ1-4GlcNAc) glycans (Fig. 3g). These 271
results indicate that only glycans containing the terminal Galβ1-3GlcNAc sequence 272
were recognized by P[19], further supporting the specificity toward type 1 sequences for 273
P[19]. 274
Additional modifications of the type 1 disaccharides of Galβ1-3GlcNAc affected the 275
P[19] VP8* binding signals. For example, the terminal A or B residues, as well as the 276
α1,2-linked fucose, could enhance the binding signals, while the Lewis epitope (α1,4-277
linked fucose) abolished binding (Fig. 3b). In vitro binding assays of the P[19] VP8* to 278
mucin core glycans (mucin cores 1 to 8) also confirmed the glycan array results, with 279
the positive binding signals observed only in those containing the disaccharide 280
GlcNAcβ1-6GalNAc, while further additions of residues GlcNAc β1-3 (mucin core 4) or 281
Gal β1-3 (mucin core 2) linking to GalNAc enhanced the binding (Fig. 3f). 282
The ligand binding specificity of the P[19] VP8* was further characterized by STD-NMR. 283
Data for a type 1 HBGA pentasaccharide LNFPI (Fucα1-2Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3Gal) 284
demonstrated that the extended type 1 chain of an internal Gal (Fucα1-2Galβ1-285
3GlcNAcβ1-3Gal) is also involved in the interaction with P[19] VP8*, in addition to the 286
GlcNAc and the terminal (H) fucose (Fig. 4a-b). Similarly, STD-NMR of P[19] VP8* with 287
mucin core 2 showed a strong interaction with the disaccharide GlcNAcβ1-6GalNAc, in 288
which the GlcNAc residue was highly involved (Fig. 4c-d). 289
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
14
P[19] RV replication was inhibited by human saliva, human milk, porcine mucin, 290
and LNFPI glycans. To examine the biologic significance of reactive glycan ligands for 291
P[19] RVs, viral replication inhibition assays were performed on a human P[19] RV. 292
P[19] RV titers were significantly reduced following incubation of the viruses with saliva, 293
porcine mucin fractions (gel-filtration), and human milk samples that previously bound 294
P[19] VP8* (Fig. 5a-b). In contrast, the virus titers were not reduced after treatment with 295
samples that did not bind to P[19] VP8* previously (Fig. 5b). Following treatment with 296
human milk, a typical dose-dependent reduction, with up to 77.2% of infectivity 297
decrease was observed (Fig. 5b). Similar blocking effects have also been observed for 298
the BSA conjugated LNFPI (Fig. 5c), whereas the non-conjugated mucin core 2 did not 299
result in an obvious inhibitory effect (Fig. 5c), possibly due to the monovalence of the 300
core 2 oligosaccharide used in the experiment. 301
The P[19] VP8* ligand binding interface differed from previously known ones. To 302
explore the glycan binding interface for P[19] RVs, NMR titration studies of mucin core 2 303
and LNFPI were conducted to measure chemical shift changes in backbone amide 304
resonances followed by 1H-15N heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) 305
spectra. All backbone chemical shifts files were available from BioMagResBank 306
database (accession number 25441). Although LNFPI caused slightly more amino acid 307
perturbations, the residues with HSQC chemical shift perturbations for mucin core 2 and 308
LNFPI largely overlapped (Fig. 6a-d), suggesting a common interface for the two 309
ligands. Interestingly, the KD-values of the HSQC chemical shift perturbation for P[19] 310
VP8* to mucin core 2 (KD = 0.4 mM) were higher than those to LNFPI (KD = 2.6 mM) 311
(Fig. 6e), indicating the affinity of P[19] VP8* to mucin core 2 was higher than to LNFPI. 312
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
15
More than half of the residues did not reveal significant perturbations upon sequential 313
addition of the ligands, suggesting that there were no effects due to buffer changes. 314
Besides, NMR of P[19] VP8* with the glycan of LacNAc (Galβ1-4GlcNAc) were 315
conducted as a control experiment and no clear chemical shifts on P[19] VP8* was 316
observed, which further confirmed the specificity of mucin core 2 and LNFPI to P[19] 317
VP8*. 318
More than 90% of chemical shift perturbations occurred for a group of amino acids 319
scattered in a location near the previously identified SA- and A-HBGA binding interfaces 320
(11, 21, 44) (Fig. 7a-b). Mutants with single-amino acid changes at seven of these 321
perturbed residues (W81, L168, H170, W175, T186, R211, and E214) which could 322
constitute a binding interface of P[19] resulted in completely loss of binding to mucin 323
core glycans (Fig. 7a-d). In addition, besides the above mentioned seven amino acids, 324
we noted that single-amino acid mutations at another two perturbed residues (T218 and 325
Y189) also eliminated binding of P[19] VP8* to LNFPI (Fig. 7e-f). However, mutations at 326
three other perturbed amino acids (D188, Y189, and S190) in the corresponding SA or 327
A-HBGA binding interface, revealed only minor reductions in P[19] binding to mucin 328
cores and LNFPI, while none of other amino acids that constitutes the SA/A-HBGA 329
binding interface had effect on the binding of P[19] RV to either mucin cores or LNFPI. 330
Together, these data indicate that P[19] uses a new, but related, glycan binding 331
interface that significantly shifted away from the previously known sites. 332
Superimposition comparison of this glycan binding site with those for P[3], P[14], and 333
P[11] supported our observations (Fig. 7b, data not shown). 334
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
16
Sequence alignment showed that all P[19] strains had identical amino acid 335
compositions on the deduced ligand binding site (Fig.8). Besides, alignment of the 336
group A RV VP8* sequences showed that the amino acids of the deduced ligand 337
binding interface of the P[19] RVs are conserved among all other three P[II] RVs (P[4], 338
P[6], and P[8]) (Fig.8), suggesting a common host factor or receptor may be responsible 339
for maintenance of the P[II] genogroup. In addition, among the diverse P[I] genogroup 340
that cause diseases in different animal species, we noticed that two genotypes (P[10] 341
and P[12]) also showed a good amino acid conservation of the deduced ligand binding 342
interface. In particular, a single residue W175 was found to be conserved among the 343
two P[I] (P[10]/P[12]) and all P[II] RVs, suggesting an evolutionary connection among 344
these human and animal RVs . 345
Similar but genotype-specific glycan binding profiles among P[II] RVs. Additional 346
binding studies for other P[II] RVs revealed similar but genotype-specific binding 347
properties among the three major human RVs (P[4], P[6], and P[8]) and the P[19] RVs. 348
Like the P[19] RVs, all of the other three P[II] RVs recognized the type 1 HBGA 349
disaccharide precursor with low affinities, while VP8* of P[4] and P[8], but not of P[6], 350
also recognized mucin cores 2, 4, and 6 (Fig. 9a-b). Since all these three major human 351
RVs previously were shown binding to the type 1 HBGAs (23), we performed binding 352
assays comparing the binding results with that of P[19] on three type 1 HBGA glycans 353
(LNFPI, LNT, and LNDFHI) with or without the secretor (H) and/or Lewis fucoses. The 354
P[6] and P[19] RVs recognized LNFPI and LNT, with the former containing the H 355
fucose, while P[4] and P[8] RVs recognized the hexasaccharide LNDFHI that contains 356
both H and Lewis fucoses (Fig. 9c-e). These data plus the conserved binding interface 357
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
17
described above suggest a potential selection pressure in the maintenance of the P[II] 358
RVs by the host mucin cores and/or type 1 HBGAs. However, observations that 359
additional saccharide residues changed the RV binding outcomes may explain the 360
diverse host ranges for P[II] in different human populations and animal species. 361
P[10] and P[19] VP8*s shared nearly identical glycan array and saliva binding 362
profiles. To further study the genetic relationship between P[10] and P[19] RVs, we 363
also performed glycan array and in vitro binding assays of P[10] as well as other three 364
randomly selected P[I] RVs (P[13], P[15], and P[23]). Nearly identical saliva binding 365
(Fig. 2c-d) and glycan array binding profiles (Fig. 10) have been observed between the 366
P[10] and P[19] RVs, while the other tested P[I] RVs revealed completely different 367
glycan binding profiles (data not shown). This result suggests strong selection 368
pressures on the P[10] and P[19] genotypes by common host factor(s), such as the 369
mucin cores and type 1 HBGAs, which may be responsible for their common host 370
range. 371
372 Discussion 373
Three major P[II] RV genotypes, P[4], P[6], and P[8], cause the vast majority (>95%) of 374
human infections worldwide (45). Interestingly, the fourth P[II] genotype P[19], unlike the 375
others, is commonly found in animals (porcine) but rarely in humans (46-50). In this 376
study, we found that the P[19] VP8* binds human milk, human saliva, and porcine 377
mucins. The P[19] VP8* revealed a significantly lower binding profiles to the human 378
saliva than the highly prevalent P[4] and P[8] RVs, consistent with the low prevalence of 379
P[19] RVs in humans observed so far. We further demonstrated that the P[19] RVs 380
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
18
recognize the mucin cores (2, 4, and 6) and type 1 HBGA precursors as the minimal 381
functional units. However, further modifications of these glycans with additional 382
saccharides, such as the A, B, H, or Lewis epitopes, and even SA, could influence and 383
further define the binding outcomes. Interestingly, this unique binding property is shared 384
with other P[II] RVs, supported by the observation that all the other P[II] RV genotypes 385
also recognize the mucin core and type 1 HBGA related sequences while exhibiting a 386
genotype-specific difference. 387
Specifically, all of the A, B, and H epitopes appear to be involved in P[19] RV binding, 388
while the addition of the Lewis epitope (1,4-linked fucose) to these type 1 HBGA 389
glycans completely blocked P[19] binding (Fig.3). This type of epitope blocking or 390
masking effect may explain why the P[19] RVs rarely infect humans; 90% of the general 391
population are Lewis-positive, leading to Lewis-negative type 1 HBGA phenotypes in 392
only 10% of the general population (45). On the other hand, the requirement of the 393
Lewis epitope for binding also seemed to play an important role in the high prevalence 394
of the P[4] and P[8] RVs in humans, which was suggested by their common recognition 395
of Lewis b (Leb) antigens containing the Lewis epitope (23). A strong association 396
between Lewis status and P[4]/P[8] RV infection has also been reported, where P[8] 397
infection only occurred in Lewis-positive children (31). In the current study, we further 398
demonstrated the importance of Lewis epitopes for these two genotypes by their binding 399
to the hexasaccharide LNDFHI (Fig.9), that contains the Lewis epitope, but not to the 400
type 1 glycans LNFPI and LNT that lack the Lewis epitope. 401
The differences in Lewis epitope involvement for P[II] RV binding may also play a role in 402
human versus animal host ranges, as some animal species, such as mice and pigs, 403
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
19
lack Lewis antigens ((51), our unpublished data), and could explain why P[4] and P[8] 404
RVs rarely infect animals. On the other hand, the infection of P[19] and P[6] RVs in 405
animals may be due to their lack Lewis epitopes, leaving the mucin cores and/or the 406
type 1 HBGA precursors readily available to bind these genotypes. As an alternative 407
hypothesis it has been proposed, that shared HBGAs are responsible for cross-species 408
P[11] RV transmission between humans and animals, since P[11] recognizes 409
evolutionarily conserved type 2 HBGA precursors or intermediate products (22). 410
The P[6] RV did not bind the mucin core glycans and bound poorly to the human adult 411
saliva (23), but recognized the penta-saccharide LNT, containing the type 1 HBGA 412
sequences without H and Lewis epitopes, and the hexo-saccharide LNFPI, without 413
Lewis epitopes (Fig. 9). This result is consistent with those of another P[6] RV (strain 414
RV3) that bound a group of long glycans containing the type 1 HBGA terminal 415
sequences (with or without the H epitope but without the Lewis epitope) and an extra 416
Lewis x side chain (32). In addition, a negative association between P[6] RV infection in 417
children and the presence of the Lewis gene has been reported (31). Furthermore, in 418
the current study, we also observed an age-specific binding pattern for P[6] RVs to 419
saliva samples from neonates and young infants (data not shown), which is reminiscent 420
of the age-specific host ranges in neonates and young infants found for the P[11] RVs 421
(24, 26). Since P[6] RV infection appears independent of the Lewis epitope, we 422
hypothesize that P[6] RVs may share a similar mechanism for age-specific host ranges 423
as the P[11] RVs, by recognizing the HBGA precursor and/or intermediate products that 424
may be developmentally regulated in neonates and young infants. 425
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
20
The finding of nearly identical saliva- and glycan-binding profiles between P[10] and 426
P[19] suggests a potential evolutionary connection between P[10] and P[19] RVs, which 427
may be selected by a common host factor such as the mucin cores and/or type 1 428
HBGAs. The conserved amino acids of the deduced binding interface, particularly the 429
exclusively conserved residue W175 between P[10]/P[12] and P[19] and other P[II] RVs 430
(P[4], P[6], and P[8]), further supports this hypothesis. Interestingly, P[10] and P[19] 431
have very similar host ranges, both pigs and humans, while the majority of other P[I] 432
RVs exclusively infect animals. This observation in our view raises concern regarding 433
the strategy to develop live, attenuated animal RV reassortant vaccines for humans, 434
because these animal RVs, such as the bovine (P[5]) and sheep (P[15]) (52, 53), may 435
not replicate in the human intestine due to lack of proper host receptors. Future studies 436
to clarify this concern are urgently required. 437
Our study raises additional issues that need to be addressed in the future. For example, 438
based on the binding properties of P[19] and other P[II] RVs, we noted a potential 439
binding specificity switch from simple mucin core glycans to more complex type 1 440
HBGAs, leading to host range changes between animal (P[I]) and human (P[II]) RVs 441
and among P[II] RVs in different human populations. However, direct evidence, 442
including supporting structural data, for such host range switching and variations 443
remains lacking. While mucin core 2 is commonly found in a variety of cells and tissues, 444
mucin cores 4 and 6 sequences were only found in a very limited type of mucin, that is 445
in human intestinal mucins (54). Thus, future studies to determine the role of mucin 446
cores versus type 1 HBGAs in human RV host ranges are necessary. Finally, during our 447
characterization of P[19] and other P[II] and P[I] RVs, we noted that the RV-glycan 448
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
21
interactions are far more complicated than previously thought. While the minimal 449
binding units of the HBGA and/or mucin core sequences are essential for binding, 450
further terminal or internal side chain modifications, the lengths of the glycan 451
backbones, and repeated sequences could strongly influence or change the binding 452
affinities and/or specificities, and therefore, the final binding outcomes. Thus, future 453
studies are needed to define the precise amino acids within the binding interface that 454
are responsible for specific interactions between each sugar residue and the individual 455
P genotypes characterized in this study. 456
Acknowledgements 457
We would like to acknowledge the Protein-Glycan Interaction Core of the Consortium for 458
Functional Glycomics for their analysis of samples by glycan microarray. We thank Dr. 459
James C. Paulson for kindly providing the mucin core 2 oligosaccharideand, Dr. Todd L. 460
Lowary for providing the ABH-BSA conjugates, and Dr. Christina Quigley for discussion 461
and editing of the manuscript. 462
Figure Legends: 463
Figure 1. Phylogeny, host ranges, and potential host glycan ligands for group A 464
rotaviruses. The group A RVs have been divided into 37 P genotypes (P[1] – P[37]) 465
based on the major surface spike protein VP4 (33). A phylogeny dividing 35 group A 466
RVs (P[1] – P[35]) into in five P genogroups (P[I] – P[IV]), reported previously (25), is 467
shown. The assigned human and animal hosts were based on the ranks of VP4/VP8* 468
sequence numbers reported for individual species with only the top (internal row) and 469
second (our row) ranks shown. It is noted that limited numbers of sequences were 470
reported for genotypes P[10], P[18], P[20] as well as the newly identified genotypes 471
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
22
P[28]-P[35], and the true host species for these genotypes need to be verified in future 472
studies. The carbohydrate ligands recognized by genotypes reported in the literature 473
are listed, including P[1], P[2], P[3], and P[7] (9); P[4], P[6], and P[8] (13, 20, 23); P[9], 474
P[14], and P[25] (25); P[11] (24, 26); and P[19] (in this study). Comparison of the P[7] 475
(PDB ID: 2I2S (44)) and P[14] (PDB ID: 4DRV (21)) receptor binding sites with P[19] is 476
in the bottom panel. The figure is modified based on data presented in previously 477
published references (21-23, 25, 44) 478
Figure 2. Binding profiles of P[19] VP8* with human milk and porcine mucin and a 479
comparison of saliva binding profiles between P[10] and P[19]VP8*s. The human 480
milk and porcine mucin samples were fractioned through a Superdex 200 column before 481
testing for binding to P[19] VP8* following a procedure described previously (24, 25). 482
Binding signals peaked in the high molecular weight fractions for both human milk 483
(panel a) and porcine mucin (panel b) samples. The P[19] VP8* also revealed a binding 484
profile similar to that of another RV (P[10] in P[I] genogroup, panel d) among 96 adult 485
human saliva samples tested (panel c). The ABH and Lewis statuses of the saliva 486
donors are indicated. Each column represents the mean A450 absorbance value and the 487
error bars represent the standard deviation for each sample tested in triplicate. 488
489
Figure 3. P[19] VP8* recognizes mucin cores 2/4/6 and type 1 HBGAs. (a) A list of 490
top glycans recognized by P[19] VP8* in a glycan array containing 610 glycans. (b)-(e) 491
Binding to four types (1 – 4) of HBGA glycans, of which the P[19] VP8* only recognized 492
type 1 HBGA glycans. The binding signals to the H1 trisaccharide (Fucα1-2Gal β1-493
3GlcNAc-) were weak to moderate but significantly increased with the addition of the A- 494
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
23
or B-residues, whereas further addition of a β1-3 fucose (the Lewis epitope, green 495
dashed circle) to the GlcNAc (forming Leb) completely blocked the binding. The 496
disaccharide Galβ1-3GlcNAc of the type 1 HBGA precursor (highlighted in red dashed 497
boxes) is believed to be essential for binding, while the terminal residues fucose, A, or B 498
residues added to Gal (Fucα1-2Galβ1-3GlcNAc-, GalNAcα1-3(Fucα1-2)Galβ1-499
3GlcNAc-, Galα1-3(Fucα1-2)Galβ1-3GlcNAc-) could increase the binding. (f) Among the 500
eight mucin core glycans (core 1 to core 8) tested, only mucin cores 2, 4, and 6 501
revealed binding signals. The disaccharide GlcNAcβ1-6GalNAc is believed to be 502
essential for binding, which is highlighted in red dashed boxes. The ELISA was 503
performed in triplicate and the whole experiment was repeated once. The error bars 504
represent the standard deviations from triplicate wells. (g) Analysis with a focused array 505
of lipid-linked sequence-defined probes, which was carried out to further determine the 506
HBGA binding specificity of P[19] VP8*. Six pair-wise comparisons of type 1 and type 2 507
chains with different lengths and capping moieties are shown. The P[19] VP8* 508
recognized only the type 1 containing probes (red). The type 2 chain probes are marked 509
green. DH represents the amino lipid that the oligosaccharide probes were linked to. ‘-’ 510
indicates fluorescence intensity less than 1. 511
Figure 4. NMR spectra of LNFPI and mucin core 2 in complex with P[19] VP8*. 1H 512
NMR of P[19] VP8* (130 µM) with LNFPI (6.6 mM) is shown in (a). The LNFPI epitope 513
map when bound to P[19] VP8* is shown in (b): dark orange, strong STD NMR effects; 514
orange, weaker; and yellow, the weakest STD NMR effects. The STD amplification 515
factors are shown in the box for residues that are not overlapped in the 1D STD 516
spectrum. For 1H resonances that were overlapped in the 1D STD spectrum, further 2D 517
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
24
STD-TOCSY was applied. The inclusion of GlcNAc-III H6s and Gal-IV H3 in the binding 518
epitope was based on the 2D STD-TOCSY and colored orange (data not shown). 1H 519
NMR of mucin core 2 (6.0 mM) with P[19] VP8* (200 µM) is shown in (c) with an 520
expanded spectral view shown at the top of the panel. ‘H6d’ indicates a downfield 521
proton and ‘H6u’ indicates an upfield proton. The epitope map of mucin core 2 when 522
bound to P[19] VP8* is shown in (d). The STD-TOCSY was used to add the overlapping 523
resonances of GlcNAc-III H3/H4/H5 in the binding epitope (data not shown). 524
Figure 5. Inhibition of P[19] RV replication in cell culture by human milk, neonatal 525
saliva, porcine mucin, and LNFPI conjugates. A representative immunofluorescence 526
microscopy image of MA104 cells infected with P[19] RV is shown in (a). Each green 527
dot represents an infected cell, as shown in the enlarged panel. The plotted blocking 528
results are shown in (b) and (c). The error bars represent standard errors from triplicate 529
repeats, and the experiment was repeated once. The statistical significance was 530
calculated by ANOVA, the asterisk refers to statistical difference <0.05. (b) Blocking 531
results with neonatal saliva, human milk, and porcine mucin FPLC fractions. Human 532
saliva samples that do (saliva (+)) and do not (saliva (-)) bind to P[19] VP8* in the ELISA 533
binding assays were used in the blocking assay as positive and negative controls, 534
respectively. The saliva samples were tested at 1:10 and 1:20 dilutions in PBS with a 535
negative control containing PBS only. Serial dilutions of the human milk samples at 1:1, 536
1:10, and 1:100 were tested. The FPLC fraction of the porcine mucin samples that 537
showed VP8* binding (F11) was tested with an FPLC fraction (F81) that did not bind 538
P[19] VP8* as a negative control. (c) Blocking results with BSA-conjugated LNFPI and 539
free mucin core 2 oligosaccharide at final concentrations of 0.25, 0.5, and 1 µg/µl. 540
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
25
Figure 6. Chemical shift changes in P[19] VP8* upon addition of mucin core 2 (a) or 541
LNFPI (b). Titrations were followed with two-dimensional 1H-15N HSQC spectra of 0.25 542
mM 15N-labeled P[19] VP8* in Tris buffer collected at 20 oC on a Bruker Avance III 600 543
MHz NMR spectrometer. NMR data shown has increasing ligand:protein ratios of 0:1 544
(red), 2:1 (orange), 8:1 (green), and 30:1 (blue). Peaks that disappeared upon titration 545
were circled. Surface representation of the HN chemical shift changes for P[19] VP8* 546
with mucin core 2 (c) and LNFPI (d) was shown. The data were plotted onto the surface 547
of a P[19] VP8* homology model with the largest changes in dark red. The chemical 548
shift differences between 1H and 15N resonances in free- and ligand-bound proteins 549
were determined as the weighted chemical shift change. For LNFPI, three HN cross-550
peaks disappeared upon ligand titration and did not reappear at higher ligand 551
concentrations. These residues, T186, E214, and C217 were set at a maximum of Δδ av 552
= 0.25. The 2-D 1H-15N HSQC with ligand:protein ratio of 30:1 was used for the bound 553
shifts. The protein structure of P[19] VP8* was based on a homology model using the 554
crystal structure of DS1 (a P[4] RV, PDB ID: 2AEN) as the template and marked by 555
using the Pymol program. (e) Plot of normalized chemical shift changes (CSC/CSC-556
max) versus free ligand concentrations (mM). 557
Figure 7. Ligand-binding interface for P[19]VP8* confirmed by site-directed 558
mutagenesis. (a) The homology model for P[19] VP8* was constructed based on the 559
DS1 crystal structure (P[4], PDB ID: 2AEN). The surface amino acid residues with 560
chemical shift changes in HSQC NMR titration are underlined. The amino acids 561
corresponding to previously reported SA- or A antigen binding sites are colored yellow, 562
while the newly identified ligand binding site is colored pink. (b) Superimposition of P[19] 563
VP8* (in cyan) with P[3] VP8* (grey, PDB ID:1KQR). The glycan binding interfaces for 564
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
26
the two genotypes are colored in pink and yellow, respectively. (c) The binding results 565
for P[19] VP8* and its mutants, each with a signal amino acid mutation at the 566
corresponding SA-binding amino acids (V101, F144, N146, K155, D188, Y189, S190, 567
T191), to the mucin cores are shown. Mutants with significant glycan binding A450 value 568
changes are marked by a star (*). (d) The binding results for P[19] VP8* and its 569
mutants, with chemical shift changes at around the sialic acid or A antigen binding site, 570
to mucin core glycans. Single amino acid mutations of seven residues (W81, L168, 571
H170, W175, T186, R211, E214) resulted in a complete loss of binding signals. (e) The 572
binding results of the P[19] VP8* and its mutants at the corresponding SA-binding 573
amino acids to the glycan of LNFPI. (f) Binding of mutations corresponding to amino 574
acids that showed chemical shift changes to LNFPI. All seven residues that were found 575
to be involved in mucin core binding (W81, L168, H170, W175, T186, R211, E214), and 576
an additional residue T218, also resulted in a complete loss of binding to LNFPI. The 577
binding assay was tested in triplicate and the entire experiment was repeated twice. The 578
statistical significance was calculated by ANOVA analysis and the mean A450 579
absorbance values with standard deviations are shown. 580
Figure 8. Sequence alignment of VP8*s from reported P[19] strains. The amino 581
acids which were deduced to interact with mucin cores and LNFPI glycans in the current 582
study are highly conserved among all the P[19] human and porcine strains, and are 583
marked by orange boxes. Residues that interact with sialic acid or type A HBGAs in the 584
corresponding genotypes were marked in red, and those that interact with type 2 585
HBGAs precursor for P[11] genotype were marked in blue. 586
587
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
27
Figure 9. Binding of P[II] RV VP8*s to mucin cores 2, 4, 6, and type 1 HBGA-588
related glycans. (a) Binding of the P[4], P[6], and P[8] VP8*s to mucin cores 2, 4, and 589
6. Two doses (2 or 20 µg/ml) of the mucin cores were tested. Positive binding signals 590
were observed for P[4] and P[8], but not for P[6]. (b) Binding of the P[II] RVs to the type 591
1 precursor disaccharide lacto-N-biose (Galβ1-3GlcNAc). Low binding signals were 592
detected for all four P[II] RVs. (c)-(e) Binding of the P[II] RV VP8*s with the type 1 593
HBGAs LNT, LNFPI, and LNDFPI. The P[6] and P[19] VP8*s showed positive binding to 594
the type 1 tetrasaccharide LNT (Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4Glc) (c) and the LNFPI 595
pentasaccharide (Fucα1-2 Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4Glc) (d) with or without the 596
terminal fucose modification (secretor), respectively. Neither of the P[4] and P[8] VP8*s 597
bound the LNT and LNFPI oligosaccharides (e). Adding a Lewis fucose to LNFPI results 598
in the LNDFHI hexasaccharide (Fucα1-2 Galβ1-3(Fucα1-4)GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4Glc), 599
which led to negative P[6] and P[19] VP8* binding, but positive P[4] and P[8] VP8* 600
binding. The mean A450 absorbance values from three replicates with standard 601
deviations are shown. 602
Figure 10. P[10] from P[I] showed a similar glycan binding pattern to P[19] VP8*. 603
A glycan array analysis was performed for P[10] in comparison with P[19]. Relative 604
Fluorescent Units (RFU) of GST-VP8* at 200 µg/ml binding to 610 glycans are shown, 605
where RFU corresponds to the strength of binding to individual glycans. The identities of 606
the 610 glycans in the array are available at 607
http://www.functionalglycomics.org/static/consortium/resources/resourcecoreh8. The 608
P[10] VP8* (panel b)revealed a similar binding profile, with a dozen identical, high 609
reactive glycans, to that of P[19] VP8*(panel a). The top fifteen ranked glycans for each 610
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
28
of the two genotypes are shown on the right. Thirteen of the fifteen glycans (marked in 611
bold) were shared by both P[19] and P[10]. The error bars represent the standard 612
deviation from four replicate wells. 613
References 614
1. Tate JE, Burton AH, Boschi-Pinto C, Steele AD, Duque J, Parashar UD. 2012. 2008 615 estimate of worldwide rotavirus-associated mortality in children younger than 5 years 616 before the introduction of universal rotavirus vaccination programmes: a systematic 617 review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 12:136-141. 618
2. Parashar UD, Gibson CJ, Bresse JS, Glass RI. 2006. Rotavirus and severe childhood 619 diarrhea. Emerg Infect Dis 12:304-306. 620
3. Walker CL, Rudan I, Liu L, Nair H, Theodoratou E, Bhutta ZA, O'Brien KL, 621 Campbell H, Black RE. 2013. Global burden of childhood pneumonia and diarrhoea. 622 Lancet 381:1405-1416. 623
4. Dormitzer PR, Sun ZY, Blixt O, Paulson JC, Wagner G, Harrison SC. 2002. 624 Specificity and affinity of sialic acid binding by the rhesus rotavirus VP8* core. J Virol 625 76:10512-10517. 626
5. Fiore L, Greenberg HB, Mackow ER. 1991. The VP8 fragment of VP4 is the rhesus 627 rotavirus hemagglutinin. Virology 181:553-563. 628
6. Settembre EC, Chen JZ, Dormitzer PR, Grigorieff N, Harrison SC. 2011. Atomic 629 model of an infectious rotavirus particle. EMBO J 30:408-416. 630
7. Stencel-Baerenwald JE, Reiss K, Reiter DM, Stehle T, Dermody TS. 2014. The sweet 631 spot: defining virus-sialic acid interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:739-749. 632
8. Banda K, Kang G, Varki A. 2009. 'Sialidase sensitivity' of rotaviruses revisited. Nat 633 Chem Biol 5:71-72. 634
9. Ciarlet M, Ludert JE, Iturriza-Gomara M, Liprandi F, Gray JJ, Desselberger U, 635 Estes MK. 2002. Initial interaction of rotavirus strains with N-acetylneuraminic (sialic) 636 acid residues on the cell surface correlates with VP4 genotype, not species of origin. J 637 Virol 76:4087-4095. 638
10. Delorme C, Brussow H, Sidoti J, Roche N, Karlsson KA, Neeser JR, Teneberg S. 639 2001. Glycosphingolipid binding specificities of rotavirus: identification of a sialic acid-640 binding epitope. J Virol 75:2276-2287. 641
11. Dormitzer PR, Sun ZY, Wagner G, Harrison SC. 2002. The rhesus rotavirus VP4 642 sialic acid binding domain has a galectin fold with a novel carbohydrate binding site. 643 EMBO J 21:885-897. 644
12. Fleming FE, Bohm R, Dang VT, Holloway G, Haselhorst T, Madge PD, 645 Deveryshetty J, Yu X, Blanchard H, von Itzstein M, Coulson BS. 2014. Relative roles 646 of GM1 ganglioside, N-acylneuraminic acids, and alpha2beta1 integrin in mediating 647 rotavirus infection. J Virol 88:4558-4571. 648
13. Haselhorst T, Fleming FE, Dyason JC, Hartnell RD, Yu X, Holloway G, Santegoets 649 K, Kiefel MJ, Blanchard H, Coulson BS, von Itzstein M. 2009. Sialic acid dependence 650 in rotavirus host cell invasion. Nat Chem Biol 5:91-93. 651
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
29
14. Lopez S, Arias CF. 2004. Multistep entry of rotavirus into cells: a Versaillesque dance. 652 Trends Microbiol 12:271-278. 653
15. Lopez S, Arias CF. 2006. Early steps in rotavirus cell entry. Curr Top Microbiol 654 Immunol 309:39-66. 655
16. Zarate S, Cuadras MA, Espinosa R, Romero P, Juarez KO, Camacho-Nuez M, 656 Arias CF, Lopez S. 2003. Interaction of rotaviruses with Hsc70 during cell entry is 657 mediated by VP5. J Virol 77:7254-7260. 658
17. Coulson BS, Londrigan SL, Lee DJ. 1997. Rotavirus contains integrin ligand sequences 659 and a disintegrin-like domain that are implicated in virus entry into cells. Proc Natl Acad 660 Sci U S A 94:5389-5394. 661
18. Graham KL, Halasz P, Tan Y, Hewish MJ, Takada Y, Mackow ER, Robinson MK, 662 Coulson BS. 2003. Integrin-using rotaviruses bind alpha2beta1 integrin alpha2 I domain 663 via VP4 DGE sequence and recognize alphaXbeta2 and alphaVbeta3 by using VP7 664 during cell entry. J Virol 77:9969-9978. 665
19. Hewish MJ, Takada Y, Coulson BS. 2000. Integrins alpha2beta1 and alpha4beta1 can 666 mediate SA11 rotavirus attachment and entry into cells. J Virol 74:228-236. 667
20. Bohm R, Fleming FE, Maggioni A, Dang VT, Holloway G, Coulson BS, von Itzstein 668 M, Haselhorst T. 2015. Revisiting the role of histo-blood group antigens in rotavirus 669 host-cell invasion. Nat Commun 6:5907. 670
21. Hu L, Crawford SE, Czako R, Cortes-Penfield NW, Smith DF, Le Pendu J, Estes 671 MK, Prasad BV. 2012. Cell attachment protein VP8* of a human rotavirus specifically 672 interacts with A-type histo-blood group antigen. Nature 485:256-259. 673
22. Hu L, Ramani S, Czako R, Sankaran B, Yu Y, Smith DF, Cummings RD, Estes MK, 674 Venkataram Prasad BV. 2015. Structural basis of glycan specificity in neonate-specific 675 bovine-human reassortant rotavirus. Nat Commun 6:8346. 676
23. Huang P, Xia M, Tan M, Zhong W, Wei C, Wang L, Morrow A, Jiang X. 2012. 677 Spike protein VP8* of human rotavirus recognizes histo-blood group antigens in a type-678 specific manner. J Virol 86:4833-4843. 679
24. Liu Y, Huang P, Jiang B, Tan M, Morrow AL, Jiang X. 2013. Poly-LacNAc as an 680 age-specific ligand for rotavirus P[11] in neonates and infants. PLoS One 8:e78113. 681
25. Liu Y, Huang P, Tan M, Biesiada J, Meller J, Castello AA, Jiang B, Jiang X. 2012. 682 Rotavirus VP8*: phylogeny, host range, and interaction with histo-blood group antigens. 683 J Virol 86:9899-9910. 684
26. Ramani S, Cortes-Penfield NW, Hu L, Crawford SE, Czako R, Smith DF, Kang G, 685 Ramig RF, Le Pendu J, Prasad BVV, Estes MK. 2013. The VP8* domain of neonatal 686 rotavirus strain G10P[11] binds to type II precursor glycans. J Virol 87:7255-7264. 687
27. Tan M, Jiang X. 2014. Histo-blood group antigens: a common niche for norovirus and 688 rotavirus. Expert Rev Mol Med 16:e5. 689
28. Van Trang N, Vu HT, Le NT, Huang P, Jiang X, Anh DD. 2014. Association between 690 norovirus and rotavirus infection and histo-blood group antigen types in Vietnamese 691 children. J Clin Microbiol 52:1366-1374. 692
29. Imbert-Marcille B-M, Barbe L, Dupe M, Le Moullac-Vaidye B, Besse B, Peltier C, 693 Ruvoen-Clouet N, Le Pendu J. 2014. A FUT2 gene common polymorphism determines 694 resistance to rotavirus A of the P[8] genotype. J Infect Dis 209:1227-1230. 695
30. Payne DC, Currier RL, Staat MA, Sahni LC, Selvarangan R, Halasa NB, Englund 696 JA, Weinberg GA, Boom JA, Szilagyi PG, Klein EJ, Chappell J, Harrison CJ, 697
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
30
Davidson BS, Mijatovic-Rustempasic S, Moffatt MD, McNeal M, Wikswo M, Bowen 698 MD, Morrow AL, Parashar UD. 2015. Epidemiologic association between FUT2 699 secretor status and severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in children in the United States. JAMA 700 Pediatr 169:1040-1045. 701
31. Nordgren J, Sharma S, Bucardo F, Nasir W, Gunaydin G, Ouermi D, Nitiema LW, 702 Becker-Dreps S, Simpore J, Hammarstrom L, Larson G, Svensson L. 2014. Both 703 Lewis and secretor status mediate susceptibility to rotavirus infections in a rotavirus 704 genotype-dependent manner. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the 705 Infectious Diseases Society of America 59:1567-1573. 706
32. Yu Y, Lasanajak Y, Song X, Hu L, Ramani S, Mickum ML, Ashline DJ, Prasad BV, 707 Estes MK, Reinhold VN, Cummings RD, Smith DF. 2014. Human milk contains novel 708 glycans that are potential decoy receptors for neonatal rotaviruses. Mol Cell Proteomics 709 13:2944-2960. 710
33. Trojnar E, Sachsenroder J, Twardziok S, Reetz J, Otto PH, Johne R. 2013. 711 Identification of an avian group A rotavirus containing a novel VP4 gene with a close 712 relationship to those of mammalian rotaviruses. J Gen Virol 94:136-142. 713
34. Huang P, Morrow AL, Jiang X. 2009. The carbohydrate moiety and high molecular 714 weight carrier of histo-blood group antigens are both required for norovirus-receptor 715 recognition. Glycoconj J 26:1085-1096. 716
35. Liu Y, Childs RA, Palma AS, Campanero-Rhodes MA, Stoll MS, Chai W, Feizi T. 717 2012. Neoglycolipid-based oligosaccharide microarray system: preparation of NGLs and 718 their noncovalent immobilization on nitrocellulose-coated glass slides for microarray 719 analyses. Methods Mol Biol 808:117-136. 720
36. Palma AS, Liu Y, Childs RA, Herbert C, Wang D, Chai W, Feizi T. 2011. The human 721 epithelial carcinoma antigen recognized by monoclonal antibody AE3 is expressed on a 722 sulfoglycolipid in addition to neoplastic mucins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 723 408:548-552. 724
37. Gao C, Liu Y, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Fukuda MN, Palma AS, Kozak RP, Childs RA, 725 Nonaka M, Li Z, Siegel DL, Hanfland P, Peehl DM, Chai W, Greene MI, Feizi T. 726 2014. Carbohydrate sequence of the prostate cancer-associated antigen F77 assigned by a 727 mucin O-glycome designer array. J Biol Chem 289:16462-16477. 728
38. Zhang D, Huang P, Zou L, Lowary TL, Tan M, Jiang X. 2015. Tulane virus 729 recognizes the A type 3 and B histo-blood group antigens. J Virol 89:1419-1427. 730
39. Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A. 1995. NMRPipe: a 731 multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR 732 6:277-293. 733
40. Mulder FA, Schipper D, Bott R, Boelens R. 1999. Altered flexibility in the substrate-734 binding site of related native and engineered high-alkaline Bacillus subtilisins. J Mol Biol 735 292:111-123. 736
41. Bahrami A, Assadi AH, Markley JL, Eghbalnia HR. 2009. Probabilistic interaction 737 network of evidence algorithm and its application to complete labeling of peak lists from 738 protein NMR spectroscopy. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000307. 739
42. Meyer B, Peters T. 2003. NMR spectroscopy techniques for screening and identifying 740 ligand binding to protein receptors. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 42:864-890. 741
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
31
43. Hermansson K, Jansson PE, Kenne L, Widmalm G, Lindh F. 1992. A 1H and 13C 742 NMR study of oligosaccharides from human milk. Application of the computer program 743 CASPER. Carbohydr Res 235:69-81. 744
44. Blanchard H, Yu X, Coulson BS, von Itzstein M. 2007. Insight into host cell 745 carbohydrate-recognition by human and porcine rotavirus from crystal structures of the 746 virion spike associated carbohydrate-binding domain (VP8*). J Mol Biol 367:1215-1226. 747
45. Santos N, Hoshino Y. 2005. Global distribution of rotavirus serotypes/genotypes and its 748 implication for the development and implementation of an effective rotavirus vaccine. 749 Rev Med Virol 15:29-56. 750
46. Wu FT, Banyai K, Huang JC, Wu HS, Chang FY, Yang JY, Hsiung CA, Huang YC, 751 Lin JS, Hwang KP, Jiang B, Gentsch JR. 2011. Diverse origin of P[19] rotaviruses in 752 children with acute diarrhea in Taiwan: Detection of novel lineages of the G3, G5, and 753 G9 VP7 genes. J Med Virol 83:1279-1287. 754
47. Mukherjee A, Chattopadhyay S, Bagchi P, Dutta D, Singh NB, Arora R, Parashar 755 UD, Gentsch JR, Chawla-Sarkar M. 2010. Surveillance and molecular characterization 756 of rotavirus strains circulating in Manipur, north-eastern India: increasing prevalence of 757 emerging G12 strains. Infect Genet Evol 10:311-320. 758
48. Das S, Varghese V, Chaudhuri S, Barman P, Kojima K, Dutta P, Bhattacharya SK, 759 Krishnan T, Kobayashi N, Naik TN. 2004. Genetic variability of human rotavirus 760 strains isolated from Eastern and Northern India. J Med Virol 72:156-161. 761
49. Maneekarn N, Khamrin P, Chan-it W, Peerakome S, Sukchai S, Pringprao K, 762 Ushijima H. 2006. Detection of rare G3P[19] porcine rotavirus strains in Chiang Mai, 763 Thailand, provides evidence for origin of the VP4 genes of Mc323 and Mc345 human 764 rotaviruses. J Clin Microbiol 44:4113-4119. 765
50. Chitambar SD, Arora R, Chhabra P. 2009. Molecular characterization of a rare 766 G1P[19] rotavirus strain from India: evidence of reassortment between human and 767 porcine rotavirus strains. J Med Microbiol 58:1611-1615. 768
51. Falk PG, Bry L, Holgersson J, Gordon JI. 1995. Expression of a human alpha-1,3/4-769 fucosyltransferase in the pit cell lineage of FVB/N mouse stomach results in production 770 of Leb-containing glycoconjugates: a potential transgenic mouse model for studying 771 Helicobacter pylori infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:1515-1519. 772
52. Hsieh YC, Wu FT, Hsiung CA, Wu HS, Chang KY, Huang YC. 2014. Comparison of 773 virus shedding after lived attenuated and pentavalent reassortant rotavirus vaccine. 774 Vaccine 32:1199-1204. 775
53. Fu C, He Q, Xu J, Xie H, Ding P, Hu W, Dong Z, Liu X, Wang M. 2012. 776 Effectiveness of the Lanzhou lamb rotavirus vaccine against gastroenteritis among 777 children. Vaccine 31:154-158. 778
54. Moran AP, Gupta A, Joshi L. 2011. Sweet-talk: role of host glycosylation in bacterial 779 pathogenesis of the gastrointestinal tract. Gut 60:1412-1425. 780
781 782
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
P[18]
P[1]
P[7] P[2]
P[3]
P[15] P[23]
P[24]
P[10]
P[12] P[28]
P[20]
P[16]
P[32]
P[26] P[13]
P[22]
P[21]
P[27]
P[33] P[29]
P[5]
P[34]
P[8]
P[4] P[19]
P[6]
P[9]
P[25]
P[14]
P[31]
P[11]
P[17]
P[30]
P[35]
P[I]
P[II] P[III] P[IV]
P[V]
Leb
A antigen
Sia
Type 2
precursor
Leb
0.1
Type 1
Chain
Mucin
cores
2/4/6
H type 1
P[7] P[14] P[19]
Figure 1
GM1
Mucin cores 2/4/6
Mucin cores 2/4/6
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
Figure 2
F1
F11
F21
F31
F41
F51
F61
F71
F81
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
OD
(450n
m)
a
FPLC fractions
F1
F1
1
F2
1
F3
1
F4
1
F5
1
F6
1
F7
1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
OD
(450n
m)
b
FPLC fractions
OH
2O
H4
OH
6O
H8
OH
10
OH
12
OH
14
OH
16
OH
18
OH
20
OH
22
OH
24
OH
26
OH
28
OH
30
OH
32
OH
34
OH
36
OH
38
OH
40
OH
42
OH
44
OH
46
OH
48
OH
50
OH
52
OH
54
OH
56
OH
58
OH
60
OH
62
OH
64
OH
66
OH
68
OH
70
OH
72
OH
74
OH
76
OH
78
OH
80
OH
82
OH
84
OH
86
OH
88
OH
90
OH
92
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
A B AB O
OD
(450n
m)
OH
2O
H4
OH
6O
H8
OH
10
OH
12
OH
14
OH
16
OH
18
OH
20
OH
22
OH
24
OH
26
OH
28
OH
30
OH
32
OH
34
OH
36
OH
38
OH
40
OH
42
OH
44
OH
46
OH
48
OH
50
OH
52
OH
54
OH
56
OH
58
OH
60
OH
62
OH
64
OH
66
OH
68
OH
70
OH
72
OH
74
OH
76
OH
78
OH
80
OH
82
OH
84
OH
86
OH
88
OH
90
OH
92
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
A B AB O
OD
(450n
m)
Saliva sample
P[10]
P[19]
c
d
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
a
b
H1-Tri A1-Tetra B1-Tetra Leb
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
OD
(450n
m)
α2
β3
α3
β
α2
β3
α3
β
α4 β3
β
α2 α2
β3
β
H3-Tri A3-Tetra B3-Tetra
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
OD
(450n
m)
α2
β3 α
α2
β3
α3
α
α2
β3
α3
α
d c
H2-Tri A2-Tetra B2-Tetra Ley
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
OD
(450n
m)
α2
β4 β
α2
β4
α3
β
α2
β4
α3
β β
α2
β4
α3 α2
β3
β
α2
β3
α3
β
α2
β3
α3
β
H4-Tri A4-Tetra B4-Tetra
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
OD
(4
50
nm
)
e
f
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
2 ug/ml
10 ug/ml
50 ug/ml
OD
(450n
m)
β3 β3
α3 α6 α3
β3
β6
β3
β6
β6
Mucin cores
GalNAc
Gal
Fuc
GlcNAc
Figure. 3
Chart Number
Glycan Structure Average RFU
193 GlcNAcβ1-6GalNAcα-Sp14 847
177 GlcNAcβ1-6GalNAcα-Sp14
I GlcNAcβ1-3
1587
176 GlcNAcβ1-6GalNAcα-Sp80
I GlcNAcβ1 -3
400
133 GlcNAcβ1-6GalNAcα-Sp81
I Galβ1-3
3887
134 GlcNAcβ1-6GalNAcα-Sp14
I Galβ1-3
2960
604 GlcNAcβ1-6GalNAcα-Sp14
I Neu5Acα2-3Galβ1-3
5399
567 Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-6GalNAcα-Sp14
I Galβ1-3
3035
505 Fucα1-2Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-6GalNAcα-Sp14
I Fucα1-2Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1 -3
444
525 Galα1-3Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-6GalNAcα-Sp14
I Fucα1-2
1633
506 GalNAcα1-3Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-6GalNAcα-Sp14
I Fucα1-2
807
66 Fucα1-2Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4Glcβ-Sp10 1024
65 Fucα1-2Galβ1-3GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4Glcβ-Sp80 950
558
GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-6Manα1-6Manβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-4GlcNAcα-Sp24 I | GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-2 GlcNAcβ1-3Galβ1-4GlcNAcβ1-2Manα1-3
505
g
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
a
c d
b
Figure 4
4.0 3.0 2.0 ppm
H4-IV
Fuc-I
H6-CH3
GlcNAc-III
CH3
H3-III
H2-V H5-I
H1-IV H1s-
V,II,III
1
2
3
4
6 5
3
1
2 4
5
6
3 1
2
4
5
6
3 1
2 4
5
6
3 1
2
4
5
6
Fuc-I
Gal-II GlcNAc-III Gal-IV Glc-V
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
BSA 00.
25 0.5 1 0
0.25 0.
5 1
0
50
100
150
Vir
us in
fectivity t
ite
r(%
of
co
ntr
ol)
Saliva(+) Saliva(-) Human milk Porcine mucin
01:
201:
10 01:
201:
10 0
1:1
00 1
:10
1:1
F81 F11
0
50
100
150
Vir
us in
fectivity t
ite
r(%
of
co
ntr
ol)
a
b
c
Figure 5
* *
* *
*
*
*
*
LNFPI-BSA(µg/µl) Mucin core 2 (µg/µl)
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
a b
c d e
Figure 6
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0 2 4 6 8
Mucin core 2
LNFPI
[Ligand](mM)
No
rma
lize
d C
SC
LNFPI
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
a
d
P19 W
ild
V101A
F144A
N14
6A
K15
5A
D18
8A
Y189A
S190A
T191A
P19 W
ild
V101A
F144A
N14
6A
K15
5A
D18
8A
Y189A
S190A
T191A
P19 W
ild
V101A
F144A
N14
6A
K15
5A
D18
8A
Y189A
S190A
T191A
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5 mucin core6
mucin core4
mucin core2
OD
(450n
m)
e
b
P19 W
ild
R17
3A
T192A
Y203A
K21
6A
C21
7A
T218A
W81
A
L168A
H17
0A
W17
5A
T186A
R21
1A
E214A
P19 W
ild
R17
3A
T192A
Y203A
K21
6A
C21
7A
T218A
W81
A
L168A
H17
0A
W17
5A
T186A
R21
1A
E214A
P19 W
ild
R17
3A
T192A
Y203A
K21
6A
C21
7A
T218A
W81
A
L168A
H17
0A
W17
5A
T186A
R21
1A
E214A
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5mucin core6
mucin core4
mucin core2
OD
(450n
m)
Figure 7
P[19]
Wild
V101A
F144A
N14
6A
K15
5A
D18
8A
Y189A
S190A
T191A
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
OD
(450n
m)
P[19]
Wild
R17
3A
T192A
Y203A
K21
6A
C21
7A
W81
A
L168A
H17
0A
W17
5A
T186A
R21
1A
E214A
T218A
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
OD
(450n
m)
c
K216
T218
R173
T192
F144 N146 K155
D188
Y189
S190
T191
W175 T186
E214
R211 H170
L168 W81
f
*
* * *
*
*
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * *
* * *
*
* * * * * * *
*
*
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220
|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|....|...
RRV|P[3] 100 DRWLATILVEPNVTSETRSYTLFGTQEQITIAYASQTQWKFIDVVKTTQNGSYS-QYGPLQSTPKLYAVMKHN-GKIYTYNGETPNVTTK--YYSTTNYDSVNMTAFCDFYIIPREEESTCTEYINNGL
NCDV|P[1] 100 NRWLATILIEPNVQQVERTYTLFGQQVQVTVSNDSQTKWKFVDLSKQTQDGNYS-QHGSLLSTPKLYGVMKHG-GKIYTYNGETPNATTG--YYSTTNFDTVNMTAYCDFYIIPLAQEAKCTEYINNGL
SA11|P[2] 100 DRWLATILIEPNVQSENRTYTIFGIQEQLTVSNTSQDQWKFIDVVKTTANGSIG-QYGSLLSSPKLYAVMKHN-EKLYTYEGQTPNARTG--HYSTTNYDSVNMTAFCDFYIIPRSEESKCTEYINNGL
CRW8|P[7] 100 DRWLATILIEPNVQTTNRIYNLFGQQVTLSVENTSQTQWKFIDVSKTTPTGNYT-QHGSLFSTPKLYAVMKFS-GRIYTYNGTTPNATTG--YYSTTNYDTVNMTSFCDFYIIPRNQEEKCTEYINHGL
L338|P[18] 100 NRWLAIILVEPDVPTEERTYTLFGQQAQITVANDSQLKWKFIVVSKQTLDGAYA-QYGPLLSATKLYAVMKHS-GRIYTYSGETPNATTA--YYSTTNYDTVNMKAYCHFYIIPRTQESKCTEYINTGL
69M|P[10] 100 NRWLATILVEPGVASTTRTYTLFGIQEQITVENSSNTKWKFIDLMKTTSSGTYT-QHSPLLSEPKLYGIMKHG-GQLWTYNGETPNAITN--GYPTTNYDSVNMTSFCNFYIIPRSQESVRTGYINNGL
H-2|P[12] 100 NRWLATVLVEPNVVTTVRTYTLFGVQEQISVENNSTTKWKFMNLIKTTLSGNFT-LYSTLLSEPKLHGIMKHG-GQLWVYNGETQTLLLQ--DYVTSNYDSLTMTSFCDFYIIPRSQESTCTEYINNGL
WC3|P[5] 100 GRWLSVILIEPGVTSETRTYTMFGSSKQVLVSNASDTKWKFVEMMKTAIDGDYA-EWGTLLSDTKLYGMMKYG-KRLFIYEGETPNATTK--RYIVTNYASVEVRPYSDFYIISRSQESACTEYINNGL
A46|P[13] 100 DMWLVIILVEPNVPQELRLYTLFGQQVNLTIENTSQTKWKFIDFRKRSQNDTYI-LENALLSETKLQAAMKYG-GKLFTFTGDTPNAAPQEWGYTTNNYSAISIKSLCDFYIVPRLPRETCRNYINQGL
Lp14|P[15] 100 NRWLATILIEPNVPETTRNYTLFGETASISVANPSQSKWRFVDVVKTTANGTYS-QYGPLLSDTKLYGVMKYN-GKLYTYNGETPNATTK--YYSTTNYDSVNMTSYCDFYIIPRAQESKCTEYVNNGL
Eb|P[16] 100 DRWIATIAIEPNVSKTKRTYTLFGITEQLTVENSYADKWKFIDFLKASTNGSYA-RYNILLSSTKLCAVAKHT-DRLYSYIRETPNAGQA--YYAFSHN-IFNLTAHCDFYIIPWAQQSLCTQYINTGL
EHP|P[20] 100 DRWLATILIEPNVASTTRTYTIFGSKEAITVENTSQNKWKFIDLAKTSLTGSYS-QYGILLSKPKLYAIMKRS-GYLYTYSGETPDAITD--YYTTTNYDSVNMTAYCDFYIIPWAQEALCTQYINNGL
Hg18|P[21] 100 NKWFATILIEQDVVAESRTYTIFGKTESIQAENTSQTEWKFIDIIKTTQDGTYS-QYGPLVLSTKLYGVMKYG-GRLYAYIGHTPNATPG--HYTIANYDTMEMSIFCEFYIMPRSQEAQCTEYINSGL
160-01|P[22] 100 DIWLVIILVEPNVPQGSRTYTIFGQQKSLMIENTSQTKWKFIDFIKESQGGTYV-PNDTLLSETKLQAAMKYG-QRLFTFIGNTPNSAPQERGYTTNNYSTINVTSLCDFYIVPRTPREVCRNYINHGL
A34|P[23] 100 DRWLATILIEPNVTSQSRTYTLFGHQEQITVENVSTTKWKFVDLAKTDINGTFT-QHGPLLSDTKLHGVMKFS-GRLYTYNGETPNATIG--YYTTTNYDTVNMVSHCDFYIIPRSEENTCTNYINNGL
TUCH|P[24] 100 DRWLATILIEPNVAAETRTYTLFGVQEQISISNTSSTKWKFVDLVKTSLTGTYS-QYGPLLSDTKLYGAMKYS-GRIYTYEGETPNAATG--YYSTTNYDSVNMTAFCDFYIIPRSQESTCTNYINNGL
134-04-15|P[26] 100 SRWLAIILVEPNVSQETRTYTIFGQQVQLQVENVSQTKWKFIDVSKTSQGGSYT-QYSTLLSNTKLDAVIKYG-GKVFTYNGETPSATSG--QYTTTNYEAIVMTLFCDFYIIPRTQEETCTNYINHGL
344-04-1|P[27] 100 DQWIAAILIEPNTNTITKNYTLFGKQEQIEVSNAS-SKWKFVDLIKKTVDGSFT-QRGPLLSDTKLYAVMKHG-SQVFTYGGETPNAATV--GYATLNYSELIIAVYCDFYIIPRAQEKQCTSFINNGL
P21-5|P[28] 100 DQWIAAILIEPNTSTTTRSYALFGKQESIEVSNPS-SRWKFVELVKHTVDGGFT-QHGPLLSNTKLYGVMKYG-QKVFTYQGETPNATTD--YYTVSNYSELIITVYCDFYIISRAQQAECTNFINNGL
AzuK-1|P[29] 100 NIWMAAIIIEPNLSAEQRTYRIYDEDVELLVDNASRTKWKIVDLYKTQQSGQYVRQNWRIYTAYKLYGIRIVD-TKLQSYGGETPNLSIIT--TTVTNYSNVEITTLSNFFIISSNNTEKCTTYMNQGL
IRL|P[32] 100 NRWLAIILVEPGVTQTTREYNVFGERIQLQVENTHQTKWKFIDISRANQSDSYA-QYGPLLSDTKLYAAMKYN-GLICTYVGETPNARTD--QYSTTNYRDVEMTIFCDFYIIPRAQENICTNYINNGL
Dai-10|P[33] 100 NRWLAVILIEPGVNQETRNYNIFGKQEQLVVSNTSSTQWKFVDAIKTSEDGSYN-QHGQLLSTNKLYAVMKSG-GRVYTYEGTTPNARTG--FYTTSNYSTVKVNVLCDFYIIPLAQESKCTEYINNGL
FGP51|P[34] 100 NKWIAAIMIEPSTISVTKNYTLFGQQEQVQVSNTSTTKWKLVELVKQTQNGVYT-QHGELLSDTKLYGVMKYG-GLVCTYKGETPNATTD--QYTTSNYSELSIAVHCDFYIISRAQEAECTRYINYGL
MC345|P[19] 100 DVWVAIISIEPNVNSESRQYSLFGVNKQITVVNTS-NKWKFMEMFRNNSNAEFQ-HKRTLTSSTKLVGILKHG-GRLWTYHGETPNATTD--YSTTSNLNEISVTTYAEFYIIPRSQESKCTEYINTGL
ST3|P[6] 100 DIWIALLLVEPNVTNQSRQYTLFGETKQITIENNT-NKWKFFEMFRSNVSSEFQ-HKRTLTSDTKLAGFLKHY-NSVWTFHGETPHATTD--YSSTSNLSEVETTIHVEFYIISRSQESKCVEYINTGL
L26|P[4] 100 DFWTAVIAVEPRVSQTNRQYILFGENKQFNIENNS-DKWKFFEMFKGSSQSNFS-NRRTLTSNNRLVGMLKYG-GRVWTFHGETPRATTD--SSNTADLNNISIVIHSEFYIIPRSQESKCNEYINNGL
Wa|P[8] 100 DFWTAVVAIEPHVNPVDRQYTIFGESKQFNVSNDS-NKWKFLEMFRSSSQNEFY-NRRTLTSDTRFVGILKYG-GRVWTFHGETPRATTD--SSSTANLNNISITIHSEFYIIPRSQESKCNEYINNGL
HAL1166|P[14] 100 DRWFACVLVEPNVQNTQREYVLDGQTVQLQVSNNSSTLWKFILFIKLEKNGAYS-QYSTLSTSNKLCAWMKRE-GRVYWYAGTTPNASES--YYLTINNDNSNVSCDAEFYLIPRSQTELCTQYINNGL
K8|P[9] 100 DRWFACVLVEPNVQNTQRQYVLDGQNVQLHVSNDSSTSWKFILFIKLTPYGTYT-QYSTLSTPHKLCAWMKRD-NRVYWYQGATPNASES--YYLTINNDNSNVSSDAEFYLIPQSQTAMCTQYINNGL
Dhaka6|P[25] 100 DRWFACIIVEPNVSLQSRDYVLDGQIVQLQVDNTSNTMWKFILFIKLTKSGNYS-QYSSLSTNHKLCAWIKRD-GRVYWFDGTVPNSSDN--YYLTINNDNSIISSDVDFYLIPRTQTDSCRRYINNGL
B233|P[11] 100 TFWMFTYLVLPNTAQTNVTVNVMNETVNISIDNSG-STYRFVDYIKTSSTQAYG-SRNYLNTAHRLQAYRRDGDGNISNYWGADTQGDLR-VGTYSNPVPNAVINLNADFYVIPDSQQETCTEYIRGGL
993-83|P[17] 100 NKKYACVMLAPNTEEGDKQYTILGRQITINLGNTDQNRYKFFDLASEN-GETYS-KIQELLTPNRLNAFMKDQ-GRLYVYHGTVPNISTG--YYTLDDIANVQTNIKCNYYIVPKSQTQQLEDFLKNGL
Ch-02V0002G3|P[30] 100 DQKYARVMLLPNTADGNKQYTILGHRVTINLGNTNSNMYKFCDLVSHN-GTTYT-KVEELVTPHGLNAFMKDQ-GKLYLYNGTVPNVQQV--YYTLANIENVQTNIKCNYYIVPKTQTGQLEDYIKNGL
Ch-06V0661|P[31] 100 NKKFACVMLPPNTPESDRQYTILGKQITIRLGNTDTVNYKFCDLLSND-GITYT-KSIELITPHRLNAFMKDA-GKLYAYSGTVPTIKKE--YHTLDNIENVQTNITCEYYIVPNSQVSTLEEYLKNGL
Tu-03V0002E10|P[35] 100 NRKYACVLMPPNTGNGDKQYTILGKQITINLGNTDQSKYKFFDLVSTD-GSTYS-KIQELTTPHRLNAFMKDQ-GRLYVYIGIVPNISTG--YYTLDDIEHVQTNIKCNYYIVSQSQTQQLEDFLKNGL
P[I]
P[II]
P[III]
P[IV]
P[V]
Figure 8
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
P[4]
P[8]
P[6]
P[19]
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5 2 ug/ml
20 ug/ml
Gal1-3GlcNAc
OD
(4
50
nm
)
Muci
n core
6
Muci
n core
4
Muci
n core
2
Muci
n core
6
Muci
n core
4
Muci
n core
2
Muci
n core
6
Muci
n core
4
Muci
n core
2
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5 2 ug/ml
20 ug/ml
OD
(4
50
nm
)
P[4] P[8] P[6]
a b
P[4]
P[8]
P[6]
P[19]
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
LNT
OD
(4
50
nm
)
P[4]
P[8]
P[6]
P[19]
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
LNFP I
OD
(4
50
nm
)
P[4]
P[8]
P[6]
P[19]
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
LNDFH I
OD
(4
50
nm
)
c e d
Figure 9
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
12
65
17
61
01
12
61
51
17
62
01
22
62
51
27
63
01
32
63
51
37
64
01
42
64
51
47
65
01
52
65
51
57
66
01
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
65,66
133,134
176,177
193 505,506
525
558
567
604
RFU
12
65
17
61
01
12
61
51
17
62
01
22
62
51
27
63
01
32
63
51
37
64
01
42
64
51
47
65
01
52
65
51
57
66
01
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
65,66
133,134
176,177
395
558
505
567
539,546,
549,551
604
571
585
587
583
RFU
b
Glycan number
a
Figure 10
Chart
Number Glycan structure
Average
RFU
604 GlcNAcb1-6(Neu5Aca2-3Galb1-3)GalNAca-Sp14 5399
133 GlcNAcb1-6(Galb1-3)GalNAca-Sp8 3887
567 Galb1-3GlcNAcb1-6(Galb1-3)GalNAc-Sp14 3035
134 GlcNAcb1-6(Galb1-3)GalNAca-Sp14 2960
525 Gala1-3(Fuca1-2)Galb1-3GlcNAcb1-6GalNAc-Sp14 1633
177 GlcNAcb1-6(GlcNAcb1-3)GalNAca-Sp14 1587
66 Fuca1-2Galb1-3GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4Glcb-Sp10 1024
65 Fuca1-2Galb1-3GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4Glcb-Sp8 950
193 GlcNAcb1-6GalNAca-Sp14 847
506 GalNAca1-3(Fuca1-2)Galb1-3GlcNAcb1-6GalNAca-Sp14 807
558 GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-6(GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-2)Mana1-6(GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-
4GlcNAcb1-2Man a1-3)Manb1-4GlcNAcb1-4GlcNAc-Sp24 505
505 Fuca1-2Galb1-3GlcNAcb1-6(Fuca1-2Galb1-3GlcNAcb1-3)GalNAca-Sp14 444
176 GlcNAcb1-6(GlcNAcb1-3)GalNAca-Sp8 400
583
GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-6(GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAb1-
2)Mana1-6(GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-2Mana1-3)Manb1-4GlcNAcb1-4(Fuca1-
6)GlcNAcb-Sp24 306
585
GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-6(GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-
3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAb1-2)Mana1-6(GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-
3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-2Mana1-3)Manb1-4GlcNAcb1-4(Fuca1-6)GlcNAcb-Sp24 302
Chart
Number Glycan structure
Average
RFU
133 GlcNAcb1-6(Galb1-3)GalNAca-Sp8 7535
604 GlcNAcb1-6(Neu5Aca2-3Galb1-3)GalNAca-Sp14 6576
66 Fuca1-2Galb1-3GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4Glcb-Sp10 6174
65 Fuca1-2Galb1-3GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4Glcb-Sp8 6018
177 GlcNAcb1-6(GlcNAcb1-3)GalNAca-Sp14 4912
567 Galb1-3GlcNAcb1-6(Galb1-3)GalNAc-Sp14 4700
134 GlcNAcb1-6(Galb1-3)GalNAca-Sp14 3786
176 GlcNAcb1-6(GlcNAcb1-3)GalNAca-Sp8 3015
558 GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-6(GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-2)Mana1-6(GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-
4GlcNAcb1-2Man a1-3)Manb1-4GlcNAcb1-4GlcNAc-Sp24 2784
585
GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-6(GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-
3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAb1-2)Mana1-6(GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-
3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-2Mana1-3)Manb1-4GlcNAcb1-4(Fuca1-6)GlcNAcb-Sp24 2531
583
GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-6(GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAb1-
2)Mana1-6(GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-2Mana1-3)Manb1-4GlcNAcb1-4(Fuca1-
6)GlcNAcb-Sp24 2372
587
GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-6(GlcNAcb1-
3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAb1-2)Mana1-6(GlcNAcb1-
3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-2Mana1-3)Manb1-
4GlcNAcb1-4(Fuca1-6)GlcNAcb-Sp24 1635
505 Fuca1-2Galb1-3GlcNAcb1-6(Fuca1-2Galb1-3GlcNAcb1-3)GalNAca-Sp14 1626
549 GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-2Mana1-6(GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-
4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-2Mana1-3)Manb1-4GlcNAcb1-4GlcNAcb-Sp25 1185
564
GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-2Mana1-
6(GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-3Galb1-4GlcNAcb1-2Mana1-
3)Manb1-4GlcNAcb1-4GlcNAcb-Sp25 1082
on March 31, 2018 by guest
http://jvi.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from