Giant objects around the Sun

8/7/2019 Giant objects around the Sun

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/giant-objects-around-the-sun 1/24

Grabbed this info from Godlike Productions…they were the only one who has more info onthe Giant Objects around the Sun. The photos come from the (STEREO AHEAD, SOHO,

STEREO BEHIND AND GOES-14 satellites and FROM OBSERVATORIES ON THEGROUND!!!….but check out the CRAP answer NASA gave this guy (in green) to explain

this!! COMPRESSION and COSMIC RAYS are supposed to be the cause for these objects inthe photos!!! What about the ground observatories that have picked these objects up?!?

LMAO!!!WAKE THE FUCK UP!!! If they feed/sell you shit WILL YOU EAT IT? BUY IT? I wouldsuggest following these links also!

Here is a nice image showing a sphere from another ground based observatory5/4/2010...three o'clock position...click image for zoom.

[link to swrl.njit.edu]

UPDATE: 4/26/2010

Krispy71 has posted a thread showing spherical objects in the images which have recently

been released from the (SDO) Solar Dynamics Observatory...can't wait to see the imagesupdating minute by minute...or will that ever happen?

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

Thanks again Krispy for your contribution.

UPDATE 3/05/10:Another amazing image from ground based Big Bear Solar Observatory.

[link to i556.photobucket.com]

http://swrl.njit.edu/ghn_web/latestimg/images/hfullc_hsos.jpg

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1048480/pg1

http://i556.photobucket.com/albums/ss4/2centsagain/fullc011.jpg

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1048480/pg1

http://i556.photobucket.com/albums/ss4/2centsagain/fullc011.jpg

http://swrl.njit.edu/ghn_web/latestimg/images/hfullc_hsos.jpg



UPDATE 02/21/2010: Below are two images taken just a few minutes apart according to

the timestamps...the first image is taken from Big Bear Solar Observatory which is in BigBear City, California (Earth) ...the second image is taken from SOHO satellite (space) which

is positioned between the Earth and the sun...It is my opinion that these are the samespheres being detected by two completely different imaging devices at nearly the

same time...let it be known by all that I do not claim to know what they are...but it surehas my attention.



UPDATE 02/20/2010: NOW SHOWING UP ON GROUND BASED OBSERVATORIES !



I made a new video of the "black dot" anomaly on the STEREO Behind images...It was veryhi-res on my laptop but lost a lot of resolution upon uploading...anyhow...here it is.

Here is an amazing video created by GLP user "tazzz". Great work.

Most recent thread summary by 2cents….

1) Original post exploded and sent thousands of intrigued readers to investigatethese NASA images.

2) Many more images began to be linked and posted with these objects including

NASA movies.



3) Creative people began to make videos showing comparisons of these objects

and now this topic is ablaze on many, many other forums and blogs.

4) Debunkers finally arrived and after a hard fought battle over many pages wereproven insignificant.

5) NASA responds with their typical “equipment malfunction” citing “imagecompression” as the cause for the objects.

6) NASA changes story and stated that “cosmic rays” hitting the instrumentsdetector was causing these artifacts to show on the images.

7) At the same time as NASA’s announcement, all of their hi-res image databases

stopped updating and they announced a CCD BAKEOUT maintenance period. (Inshort, they cut off our supply of recent hi-res images)

8) February 2nd 2010, CCD BAKEOUT is now over and new images are being

observed.

9) It was confirmed that these objects were being captured by at least fourdifferent satellites separated by tens of millions of miles. (STEREO AHEAD, SOHO,

STEREO BEHIND AND GOES-14)

10) Spheres being captured at same time and at same location on the sun fromsatellites and from GROUND BASED observatories.

11) I will try and post this summary often so people can stay tuned in with the

current facts, also many images, theories and storylines have arisen on this threadso I would suggest you take your time to read as much of the thread as possible

but at least, periodically check the main page for updates.

Here is ORIGINAL POST:

(NOTE: These objects have been on every image since around Jan. 18th and are

moving around the sun even as we speak)

Somewhere around Jan. 18th, several objects starting appearing on many of the EIT images

both ahead and behind. Here are a few images but there are many, many more images toresearch other than what I have linked here.

UPDATED 02/21/2010: (2cents opinion after the first 195 pages of this thread.)

OK...I have read every single word in this entire thread since the beginning as well as

looked at every image posted or linked...watched all videos except the few music videosposted...

I have done my own research while the commited few have done an excellent jobmanipulating images and making videos...thanks for all you've done (you know who you

are)

My conclusion at this point is this...after discovering the spherical objects on severalGROUND BASED observatory images...I have no clue as to what the hell those things

are...please...please...keep on looking and researching..........I think there's more we will be



findingin the coming days. 2cents

This was posted on page 109

Here is NASA's explanation of them:

[link to www.colinandrews.net]

Dear Mr. Andrews -

(Sorry not to make this more original, but we've had a number of questionsabout these features since the Deep Space Network Central Data Recorder

(CDR) failure last week, and this is a cut-and-paste that I've been using to reply toa lot of them. No disrespect intended, but very busy currently with writing

proposals for a Senior Review that decides whether to continue funding ourmissions. Please let me know if this isn't comprehensible.)

What you're seeing are compression artifacts, highly magnified. We have to

compress the images digitally in order to keep a good rate of taking them and still

be able to telemeter them back (across an increasing distance, which weakens thesignal and limits how much data we can send per unit time) to earth. The images

you are looking at in the video are "space weather beacon mode" images that aretelemetered down nearly continuously:

[link to stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov]

in near-realtime, and are both binned (undersampled spatially, down to 512 x 512pixels) and heavily, lossily compressed digitally onboard (analogous to the various

JPEG compression settings on a digital camera, but much more severe). Thenthey're made available on the Website in a variety of magnifications or "upresings"

which only magnify the artifacts. Usually, by now (that is, three days or more afterthe data were obtained), we'd have the full-resolution (2048 x 2048 pixel) images,

which are much less heavily, but still lossily, compressed, and are played back toa Deep Space Network (DSN) ground station via the high-gain antenna on one of

the STEREO spacecraft. Unfortunately, a piece of ground hardware at DSN failed,and we're only now catching up on the full-resolution data from January 18 onward

--- except the lower-resolution (512 x 512) beacon mode data. People first startedseeing the odd images around that date, when there was a moderate solar

energetic particle event, but those up-resed images have now been replaced onthe SSC Website with the full resolution ones. DSN has caught us up to January

20, the last time I checked.

The compression artifacts are particularly obvious when a particle (cosmic ray orsolar energetic, charged particle) hits the CCD detector on the spacecraft

head-on. (Grazing hits show up as bright streaks.) The compression scheme hasa hard time mathematically representing sharp, single- or few-pixel features, and

you get a characteristic pattern of a bright dot in the middle of a compression

block (a subsection of the image) surrounded by a pattern of dark dots.

Best,

http://www.colinandrews.net/SolarSpheres-02.html

http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/beacon/beacon_coverage.shtml

http://www.colinandrews.net/SolarSpheres-02.html

http://stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov/beacon/beacon_coverage.shtml



Joe Gurman

(Dr.) Joseph B. Gurman

STEREO Project ScientistQuoting: Anonymous Coward 776788

:upload fou: :upload new:



two: :Capture:

:gridgreen:

Discovered this link while doing some research and was blown away by what these people

were reporting 10 years ago.

[link to www.tmgnow.com]

I’m posting what I found on the link above..down below.

http://www.tmgnow.com/repository/solar/anomaly.html

http://www.tmgnow.com/repository/solar/anomaly.html



And the last point here… In the weeks before the Missile launch event, we saw

something amazing in the GOES images. It’s hard to believe that it wasn’t seen by

others. (Well, maybe it was. But nobody’s talking!). Several years ago, when the

Japanese solar satellite was open to the public, we picked up an incredible image. This

image revealed a huge ship orbiting the sun, with rays of light shining out from the sun

behind it. The picture below is one of the images that we have, revealing that ship. Weare unsure of the ship’s exact size, because we do not know it’s distance from the sun

or from the earth. But it’s large, as you will see! In fact, the idea that it’s orbiting the

sun may not be correct, it may have been, even in this image, closer to the earth. At

times we saw the great towers on the ship alter and seem to move from one position to

another on the craft. It may be a carrier or it may be some kind of refueling or energy

gathering operation or all of that. We don’t really know. But it remains clear that it was

there. Here’s that original image.

Our original article with more images is HERE.

UNEXPLAINED SOLAR

ANOMALYby gary d. goodwin

(Please be aware! This page is large with many images and may take some time to download!)

http://tmgnow.com/repository/solar/anomaly.html




Preface: The images that you are about to see are untouched and reprocessed in anyway

except where it is clearly stated that I have done so. In those cases I will explain to the best

of my ability the process that has taken place. Let me further reassure, you the reader that

I am in absolutely no way attempting to fool, trick or mislead you the reader. I have no

hidden agenda. The anomaly that you will see in these images were just as much a surpriseto me, as I am sure they will be to you. As a member and co-founder of THE

MILLENNIUM GROUP, I have no desire to suggest that these images represent anything

but anomalies, but let them 'speak' for themselves. And just like most of you, I am not a

degreed astrophysicist, so I cannot rule out that it is indeed a natural phenomenon. If there

is anyone with the ability to prove the true nature o fthese objects, I invite you to

immediately contact me and share your opinion (please keep the comments appropriate). It

is the explicit focus of this research group to seek out truth in science, and to do so by the

conventional scientific method of observation.

Setting The Time Line Scene:

In late 1995 Hale Bopp was publicly discovered and became the subject of debate that it

now is.

In late 1996 the rage over Chuck Shramek's *Companion* picture, and the great debate

over the Courtney Brown/Prudence Calabrese images was in full force, bringing world

recognition, thanks to the Art Bell Broadcasts.

One year after HB passed through our system on, May 4th 1998, The Millennium Group

brought into public recognition the arrival of the celestial object later named the Comet

SOHO J1.

On June 24 1998 The Millennium Group Research Team posted the very first shot of what

is now popularly known as "The ORCA". We thoroughly documented evidence for the

Probable New Solar System Object.

On February 11th 1999 The Millennium Group posted further evidence of The Probable

System Object, more commonly known as The ORCA.

I would like to add here that throughout this period of time there has been a dramatic

increase in natural destructive forces over the entire face of the earth. We have seen record

after record broken; fastest wind speed, most powerful hurricanes and tornadoes, powerful

earthquake increases in size and numbers, incredible temperature swings, and rapidincreases in melting and calfing of glaciers and ice shelves in the Arctic and Antarctica. Is

the timing a coincidence? Please! What do you think?

The Anomaly



I want to make it perfectly clear that the ORCA is NOT the same anomaly that I will

present in the images below. Since the advent of the ORCA (circa June 1998) we have been

intensely watching all of the available images of the sun. In October of 1998, we began

seeing a strange object in the lower left hand corner of the SOHO C2 images. At first we

thought it was simply an imaging anomaly, perhaps a wrinkle in a filter or a scratch on the

lens. We ignored it. But then we noticed that it would show up some of the time and not atother times. There was initially no apparent pattern. It wasn't with any particular filter,

any particular exposure time nor any other expected variable. The only noticable variable

was time; It would be there for a few days and then it would be gone for a few days. The

image below is a typical SOHO C2 image showing the anomaly. You can see it in the lower

left hand corner of the picture. We simply call it the *Tower*. At the same time we began

seeing the Tower, in early October 1998 the gray blocks that you can see in all four corners

of the C2. They appear to have been placed there so as to cover up the Tower. You will also

notice that only the "tip" of the Tower appears to be showing. To myself, it appears to be

long and cylindrical and as if it were a "tube" that had been sliced off at an angle. You will

also notice that there appears to be another shorter tower next to it. In a five megabyte

movie that we have (too large for the page), relatively small bright pixels can be seencoming from the left border of the image and going toward and down in to the tower.

Incredible images.

(This image has NOT been altered except to be shrunk by 50% and to add the red box)

The Tower was also seen in the image that we posted concerning the ORCA in February of this year. You can see that the Tower has moved a bit and we appear to be seeing a

different aspect of it.



(In this image there appears to be some type of filter laid over the image. We have not altered

this at all.)

Shortly after this image the Tower disappeared from the SOHO C2. In the next few days

we obtained the following image from the SXT site. As you can see this is an Xray image

from the satellite YOHKOH. In the lower right hand center you can see something that

again appears out of the ordinary. The anomaly is geometric, with extensions out of a

center at a right angle. Pay particular attention to the rays of light emanating from behind

the object. As if sun light were radiating through or around a cloud, leading me to think

that this object is NOT on the surface, but at some distance from the surface. Notice that

there are no other "sunspots" on the surface of the sun that appear geometric or that have

similar characteristics as this object. Finally we noticed something else very interesting

with this object in relation to the Tower that we had previously seen in the SOHO C2

images. You will recall that the Tower in the C2 images appeared to have a double or

multiple tower. This image has an extension to the left, that is a double tower. (By the way -

this makes two DIFFERENT satellites displaying similar anomalies).



(This image was cropped from the SXT EIT composite. No other processing done to this image

on our end)

Today I received this email from Don Carros. Don has some expertise in imaging and I was

shocked to see his evaluation of the above image.

Gary:

I started the review of the digital image you sent. It is the SXT image of

2-16-99. Being the skeptic in residence I looked at the image thinking I was going to come away with a simple explanation. NOT SO!

First, we are reviewing a second or third generation rendering of an original

CCD image from YOHKOH. So....there is a lot to be desired. I used the Gnu Image

Processor (GIMP) under Linux to tear the image apart. Right now I cannot

explain just what it is that I am seeing.



In general the strange object appears near sunspot 8458. There is something

there. I will try to send the details of the analysis under separate cover

later. It has shape. The strange mechanical looking structure does NOT appear to

be a digital aberration as it is several pixels wide and there is evidence of

tonal (color) gradation near the edges. This implies that someone did not put it

there either without considerable effort.

Most of the detail is is lost since the image is fairly dark and the object is

even darker. Most of the detail falls within the range of 10-50 out of a range

of 0-255 shades of gray, so it is fairly dark.

I am having trouble explaining away the rays that appear to radiate from beneath

the object. I will need to spend more time to be sure the rays do NOT radiate

from the object itself versus are reflected from beneath as you suggested. The

problem I have with your theory is that is the object appears that dark, How

can it radiate light?

Don

Two days later, the YOHKOH image showed absolutely no object by sunspot #8458 (this

composite is available if anyone desires to compare it). Then on March 3rd an associated

anomaly began to appear coming from around the back of the solar disk. You can see it

beginning to peek around the upper left side of the solar disk. The object is extended and

geometric, and again unnatural appearing.



(This image was cropped from the SXT EIT composite. No other processing done to this imageon our end)

Then today, April 22nd 1999, the anomaly appeared again in the YOHKOH images. This

time it appeared to be moving to the opposite side of the solar disk and was lit up by the

radiation from the sun. This is a cropped blow up of the image, posted just as it was on the

original web site.



What is not displayed in these images are periodic anomalies occurring at the distant end

of the object, that seem to be in line with the object, much like in the five megabyte movie.

Please keep in mind that each of the above images were taken on a separate day, meaning

that sun is continuing to rotate. But the anomaly remains in the same position.

These are only a few of the images that we have that show these anomalies. We literally

have dozens of images that show similar, if not the same objects. It is indeed a fascinating

universe that we exist in. I am truly unable to explain the things that we are seeing in these

images. However, I am not going to keep them from the public. we need as many eyes to see

these anomalies as possible. Perhaps someone has an explanation!

One more point and one more picture:After watching this object/anomaly over the past few months, seeing the multiple towers

and extensions, I remember one special image from mid/late 1997 of Hale Bopp. At the

time, I had no real explanation for what I saw. But after seeing these anomalies I realized

that there was quite a remarkable similarity between the Tower(s) and the companion that

was accompanying Hale Bopp in the image. Note the unnatural extensions that appear to

be coming out of the companion. There also appears to be a "field" surrounding the entire

companion. Now it was never my intention to exploit or to even relate the two, but look and

see if you don't see the similarities! This image was taken by an amateur astronomer who

receives a stipend from NASA and who, by the way at the time, emailed me and insisted

that I remove the image from my site. I didn't remove it - only his name. Never heard from

him again!



(The only thing that I have done to this image, since I acquired it was to turn it upside down!)

On to part TWO

I would highly recommend that you re-read part one of this report, before going

on!

This image was picked up by our research team from the YOHKOH satellite siteback in February of 1999. The object that is obvious in the near center of the

image has been seen numerous times since that date, on various different images,from different satelllites. (note what appears to be a stream of energy emanating

from the top of the object out of view to the north-up).

We would also like to remind you of this image, that has been persistent on

SOHO's EIT images (the dates are in the upper left hand corner of each image andare all 1999).

http://tmgnow.com/repository/solar/anomaly2.html



http://tmgnow.com/repository/solar/anomaly2.html




The explainations for these two images have always been; "it's a sunspot", "It's

pixilation", or "It's a burn in on the screen". Of course in the lwoer image, it'ssometimes there and sometimes not.

This additional incredible image from Matt Ridgway seems to support the

existence of these objects. Here's what he said:

"I've found some highly-suggestive pics regarding that solar object I pointed out several months ago. Now, as you might remember, I sent a quick note to the guys

at SOHO and they sent a quick one back saying the object was a flaw in theviewing lense, which is the obvious conclusion. Now, the only trouble with that

explaination is that the object doesn't show up on ALL the SOHO picks, but only onthe few that utilise particular radiation bands, like the x-ray series and so on. BUT,

a week or so ago I happened upon THIS pic, (below) which I believe clearly showsthe object, this time from a vantage point that is almost straight on, and you can

tell that the 'object(s)' here are clearly pointing toward the viewer, have adifferential 'brightening' between the two, and are obviously something 'in the

frame' and not 'on the frame'... Could it be possible that this object has beenartificially placed in orbit around the sun to act as a sort of lightning rod for these

CME's, to attract and bleed them off in order to minimize the risk during the solar maximum? What sort of 'object' could withstand such abuse? I have no idea."



Note the arc that travels between the two objects or between the two extensionsof one object!

The following picture, provided to us by another reader, appears remarkablysimilar to the objects in the image above. The horizontal line through the object, is

a line of reference put there by the SOHO team for measurement purposes. Thissuggests that the folks from NASA are very aware of these objects just as we are!



This final comment from M-Core Member, Ray Ward, seems to pull together ourbeliefs concerning what we are seeing here:

"I am in awe of these eit composite images that I we have been following. This is truly thebest shot yet of something electrical going on, and not exactly a natural thing either. The

arc shows so clearly what we have seen elsewhere, that this thing is a mechanical devicemeant to collect, store(possibly), and redirect the energy it receives to somewhere else. The

best candidate I know of at this time is that object we always see on the ecliptic that seemsto be in our orbit but on the far side of the sun. I cannot imagine what must be going on.

Its obvious that the need for extra energy is there. Or is it necessary for our own well-being? As you know, the thing is impervious to the flares of the sun and one can only

surmise that this thing is not natural since it exhibits the characteristics of an intelligentlycontrolled machine. The size of the tubes and the fact that they are transparent suggest

that some form of bending of the energy transmission takes place. The relative sizes of thetubes in relation to one another suggest that this is a broadband frequency gathering device

that collects the energy in the xray region, the microwave region, and then some in order to

redirect the "beaming" of the energy at a right angle to some object around the corner of the sun and that lies behind it.

This object, judging by the oscillations in its position appears to be in virtually the same

orbit as our planet and may be an object that lies at one of the 5 lagrangian points recentlydiscussed in the NASA press release, that is on the opposite side of our orbit around the

sun. Also, the interior of the body in the Feb,1999 image is deep enough to contain a largeenough right angle bend to act as a good conduit for this energy to go through in the helix

pattern that is so characteristic for such energy that rides the outer skin of such tubes.



Its too bad that they have to go and erase the magnetic field lines that seem to go from thetower to the body that is clearly shown many times in the C3 images and the C2 images.

What a pity.

The thing that most interests me at this time is the nature of this body on the far side of thesun. I would wonder as to its true nature, that is whether is a true planet or what else.

Since it did not seem to be there before Hale- Bopp, my vote goes to its being a largeartificial object that came in with the comet. Whether its a machine or perhaps eveninhabited is open to just guesswork at this time. The same goes for this tower thing we

have been seeing for some time. I suppose it could be inhabited since it seems to beimmune to anything the sun can throw at it, but it would not be necessary either for its

obvious this thing has excellent control of its position and direction of travel and can movequickly when it has to. It velocity capability has to be at least 1 million miles an hour to be

able to play this game of catch the flare energy. The neat thing about this machine is that itis obviously utilizing the same energy for propulsion as it is using for its control while at the

same time redirecting the energy that it "catches". I suspect that this thing has a rathersimple feedback system that simply allows it to move with the push of the redirected energy

beam while at the same time perhaps deriving control by a simple opposition to the spindirection of the flare energy being expelled. If this is the case, then complex circuitry

involving vulnerable computers is not necessary. Sort of like a fuzzy logic in a way. Withsuch large charges involved and the distances much closer than what we might envision, it

is perhaps not necessary to worry about tight tolerances since the electrical chargesinvolved would react on their own without any interference whatsoever. So, if this thing

were out of tolerance by 10%in position it might not matter since the charges wouldoverride something of much greater magnitude of error or distance, angles in this case. So

the error of 10% in this case would be insignificant as the forces are so much greater andcould override perhaps 100% error at the distances we see involved with this thing. The

thrust mechanism would simply utilize the thrust of the redirecting of the energy to theother body, that is,using the simple push of the energy being expelled to the other side of

the sun. That would allow it to remain in position upon capture by the flare and there you

have one side being attracted to the sun via the flare and the counter force simply the

explusion of the magnetic lines of force to the other body. This concept reminds me of theinterstellar ram jet concept that I saw a couple of decades or more ago. You have an engine

with no moving parts that simply plows its way through the gases of space by combustion inthe rear of the engine. In the case of this tower, it uses a similar concept, but needs no

combustion since the field strengths involved pull the flare energy through the tubes. Isuppose on further thought the machine may not be inhabited out of a more aethetic type

of reason rather than a technological one. Since the body on the other side of the sun is atour distance, it would much more likely be inhabited since the requirements for life support

would be easily met.

I guess I am digressing a lot as I write this but it seems necessary to point out that it is

much easier to deal with plasma in space than on earth where oxidation can take place.With the absence of air or oxygen, and in the presence of only charged particles due only to

the high heat needed to cause these gases to become plasma, things can be dealt with in amore forgiving fashion and without the tolerances needed here on earth. Already using

the electromagnetic fields that the sun has and utilizing the property of helical typedischarges it is much easier to capture large amounts of plasma than just going into space

and trying to collect it. This machine already has it collected for it due to the aboveproperties. So, instead of looking outward at the stars, we need to look inward, toward the

sun, for our propulsion. It would be much more easily accomplished there than in the farreaches of space.



Something else comes to mind in this collection of plasma. I am sure you have heard of therecent development of transparent aluminum. I maybe am showing a lot of ignorance but it

seems to me that something made of this transparent aluminum would much more easilyabsorb the energy in these flares since some of the filters used are the same. This type of

tower would facilitate the collection of that particular frequency of energy since it wouldmore easily penetrate this type of structure and be allowed to travel down the tube by the

general flow already generated by this type of machine. It just might simply be a fine tuningfor efficiency of collection in addition to the general principles that are utilized for this thing.In addition, the angle of the tower is roughly 30 degrees in angle at the top, looking at the

side of the tower. This is in the range of angles that we normally see in crystalline

structures, so this angle is obvious. Add to that the circular aspect of the tower and this,again,adds another aspect to the design of the tower for more ease in collection of energy in

the flare. It is a crude way of collection of energy into a 90 degree bend and the moregentle bend is in the interior of the machine for less loss of transmission of the energy thus

obtained. It may also be that once the process of collection commences, that the processbecomes more efficient due to the inherent initial 90 degree bend into the tube by the

bending of the entire stream of particles into the tower. Once the flux tube from the sun isbent properly into the tower, the rest of the flare will follow the same path since it is one of

least resistance.

I know this is a lot of speculation, but, when one can figure all of these details into the

tower design, and have a plausible explanation for them, then that entire concept looks thatmuch more plausible. I don't know if this is some form of Occam's razor or not. It just

seems that a bunch of simple things observed separately and matched to a particular shapemake that thing much more plausible, far beyond chance that such a thing could exist as we

are envisioning it. It just seems to have a ring of truth to it. Well, I hope this is fuel forthought, ha,ha.

Ray

Anyone care to comment?

gary d. goodwin

STILL WANNA EAT THE SHIT They’re FEEDING YOU?!?!?

Giant objects around the Sun

Documents

Transcript of Giant objects around the Sun