Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian:...
-
Upload
myron-getman -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian:...
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
1/72
OCCURRENCES OF MOSASAREMAINS FROM THE FOX
MAASTRICHTIAN: LATE CRETACEOUS! OF NORTH DAKOTA
By Myron R.C. Getman
A Bachelors Thesis submitted to the Facultyof the Department of Geology of
St. Lawrence University
In partial fulfillment of the requirements forthe degree of
Bachelor of Science with Honors in Geology
Canton, N.Y.1994
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
2/72
This thesis submitted byin partial fulfillment of the require
Bachelor of Scienc
Lawrence Universitapproved by the facultyadvisor under who
te
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
3/72
pageTitle Page
ApprovalTable of Contents
List of Pigures'ist of Abbreviations
AcknowledgmentsAbstractIntroducti.onMethods
1V
V11V111
Previous Works
Ages and Locat onsStratigraphic DescriptionsSystematic PaleontologySummaryReferences
1820
3359
61
TABLE OF CONTENTS
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
4/72
nr' T ov Frcunmspa25Stratigraphic Column of Site A1050
2. Strati graphi c Correlation ofSites I, 2,and 31050
."igure 3. Stratigraphic Column showing IronLightning/Fox Hills contact Carpenter et al. 1988! 32
Figure 4.Mosasaurus dekayi,buccal side and base oftooth 35
Frgure 5. Mosasaurusdekayi,lingual side and tzp of36tooth
Frgure 6. Mosasauzusdekayi,side views of toothshowrng longitudinal carznae 37
Figure 7. Mosasaurusdekayi,illustration of known38specrmen Russell, 199gj
Figure 8.Plaoplatecarpus sp., buccal sade and top oftooth
Figure 9.Plaoplatecarpus sp., lingual side and base oftooth
Figure 10.Pli oplatecarpus sp., side views of tooth
showing very faint longitudinal carrnaeFigure 11. Mosasaur vertebra
F gure 12. Mosasaur vertebraFigure 13. Iaedyosuchus sp., side vzew anti base of
tooth
Fzgure 14, Iaedyosuchus sp., anterror vrew a..d tip oftooth
V
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
5/72
:.. g" e 15.Fig.re 16.Figure 17.Figure 18.Frgure 19.5355
58
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
6/72
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
.Kansas StateKS...North Dakota Geological SurveyNDGS.
St. Lawrence UniversitySLU.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
7/72
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
aid o the following people, this
:basis would not be possible: Dr. J. Markhis rmmeasurable patience, knowledge, andonal drive; Dr. John Hoganson for
finding most of the material used in thefcr '. s enthusiasm, respect and ability to
s rings"; Peter Connett for being a constantcos.panion anc partner during the field -session, forbeing patient, open minded, and being able to toleratemv oddities; Dean Schwartz and the Office of AcademicAffairs for giving Peter and I the arants we needed to
complete our work and for being patient; Dr. F.D. "Bud"Holland Jr. for heine a well sprinc of knowledge andconsiderable aid in the field; Ray are Kathy Haas for
allowing Peter and 1 to stay at their home and forgiving us much needed breaks from orr work birding andthe Laird outcrop!; rhe Rotary Club of Glens Falls, NYwithout whom most of my educational a..d thesis-relatedfinancial needs would never have beer met, my family who
have supported me throughout this experier ce, and thecountless others who have helped in ays ti ey may notrealize.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
8/72
Occurrences of Mosasaur and Other Reptilian fossilremains from the Fox Hills Formation
Maastrichtian: Late Cretaceous! of North DakotaMyron R.C. Hetman
ABSTRACT
In an attempt to add to the undezstancii..g of thevertebrate biota of the Fox Halls Fozma ion of rhe Upper
Cretaceous !Maastrichtian! of North Dako a, three teeth anda dermal scute recovered from the Timbe Lake/Iron Lightningboundary of the Fox Hills Formation by R.M. Feldmann nearLinton, Emmons County were identified. Basec on morphology,the larger of the two has been identified a Mosasaurusdekayi Bronn 1838. The smoother tooth exhibits the conzcal,
nearly circular horizontal cross-sectio c .aracteristicsassociated with crocodilian teeth. The smallest of the
teeth actually a tooth fragment! has been identified asbelonging to some type of Tyrannosaurid. The dermal scutehas been identified as belonging to the terrestrial turtleBaszlemys sp.
A small tooth, a metacarpal and a verteoza werezdentified. The tooth has been identified as belonging to
Plioplatecazpus sp. and the metacarpal be'ongs to anunidentified reptile. The vertebra has been identzfied asbelongzng to a mosasaur.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
9/72
ddrtron, field work was performed during 1993. A=-'te '." : a Timber Lake Member of the Fox Hills Formation
' as '= := ' in Bowman County, North Dakota whrch, afterexo'cr=- ","*, excavation and considerable sievrng producedma erial and, based on a broken metacarpal, is
thought to possibly belong to some type of turtle. The bone
belongs o two drstinct types, a compact "structural" type,thought to be rib material, and a thinner, more porous typebelieved to be a portion of the skull. During the fieldsessron, a bone was also discovered within a concretion inEmmons County. After cleaning and inspection, this bone hasbeen identified as a mosasaur vertebra.
The discovery of these vertebrate fossils aids in theunderstandrng of the little studied Fox Hills reptilianfaunas. All the fossils, with the exception ofBasi lemys
sp. arepreviously known in the Fox Hills Formatron.Basilemys sp. is known from the Fox Hills of South Dakotabut not from North Dakota. An unrdentified mosasaur tooth
was repo ted by A.G. Leonard in the 1912 Hnited StatesGeological Survey Bismark F'olio. At this time, the locationof the tooth is unknown.
The presence of Mosasaurus dekayi in the Fox Hillsrepresents a stratiaraphic and geographic range extension.ThePli oplatecarpus sp., because its species is uncertainmay epresent a stratrgraphic range exten io from theCampanran age Frerre Shale of South Dakota. cr a geographicexent o.. From the Maastrichtian of New ersey. Two
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
10/72
r..ma-e mosasaur vertebrae lend credrbrlity to the.osasaurs in the Fox Hrlls sediments. The
. ;..c =-"" tooth fragment represents a stratigraphic range.".== ase from the overlaying Hell Creek. Further
=-= chary reptilian fossil remains provide furtherofferee of vertebrate faunas in the Fox Hills Formation.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
11/72
INTRODUCTION
rs known about the reptilran fossils which arethe stratigraphy of the Fox Hills Formation.
sert of creatures might be found contained within thiswhich is transitional between the marine sediments
the Pierre Shale with its mosasaurs and other marine
eptrles and the terrestrial deposits of the Hell CreekFormation and its dinosaurs'? Could there have been
rosasaurs exploiting the deltaic, barrier island, and other
regresszve environments that the Fox Hills FormationErickson, 1992! represents? Could they have been swimming
in the shallow waters feeding on ammonites, fish or, likekiller whales and sharks today, chasing larger prey onto thebeach to be devoured. These creatures and their marine
brethren were highly adapted, undoubtedly capable of amazing
hunting abilities. Could there have been tyrannosaurshunting on the terrestrral portion of the delta? There isno reason to believe both these creatures and theirassociated faunas were not in the deltaic environment of the
Fox Hills Formation. Previously, little of their remainshave been found. Perhaps the envrronment, which would havebeen rich wrth brologrcal activrty, of the Fox Hills was notconducive for the creation of fossils or perhaps, peoplenave not been lookrng or wrlling to take the rime to look inthe rroht places. As a result, the vertebrate faunas of theFox Hrll Fcrma ron have not been studiec as closely asthose r. .he Prer e Shale and Hell Creek Formatrons.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
12/72
there is now evidence of their, and other,nas, existing in the paleoenvrronments
by t' e Timber Lake Member of the Fox Hills
: as my rntent to aid in the study of vertebratefa"nas ": the Fox Hills Formation when Peter Connett and I;ear our to North Dakota in July, 1993. My goal was to aid
he collection of fossil fish and shark teeth for Drs.Hoga. son and Mark Erickson and to look for a potential
o" basis project. Fortunately, a location with bone onthe surface was found by Mr. Ray Haas, an expedition member,on he first day of tooth collection near Bowman, NorthDakota. This sate was placed stratigraphically within theTimber Lake Member of the Fox Hills Formation. It was later
excavated and more bone was recovered. Shortly afterwards,
a bone whrch was contained within a concretion was found byMark Erickson. This bone, since recognized as a mosasaurvertebra, was also from the Fox Hills Formation. Dr.Erickson later added another mosasaur vertebra, which had
also been contarned within a Disiniopsis pod, that had beenrecovered during a previous field session.
After beginning the Fall 1993 semester, and in theprocess of sieving for my Senior Thesis, rwo teeth were sentto me by Dr. John Hoganson in the hopes I might be able toidentify then' and ncorporate them into the theses. Theyhad alee bee reccvered from the Fox Hills Fo mation by R.M.Feldmannn ar - s re .,ear Lrntorw North ajora where he had
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
13/72
ty annosaurrd tootn and ate, also recovered by :eldmann, were
,:= pt o. and illustration. During the springse-eater .-";'= =- on a trip to meet Dr. Gorden BellJr.,
Boganson niscovered a tiny,reptilian tooth and a
metacarpal in the Timber Lake approximately onefrom the excavation site. These were also sent for
snnsecp ent desc iption, illustration, and possible'on
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
14/72
METHODS
The Ho man site T. 130 N, R. 106 W, Sec. 24! wasthoro:ghlv surface collected. It was orrgir ally intended tosuzface collect and then dry sieve the rema ning surfacenaterral before the hill which the bone was zound on was cut
into for the excavation. Unfortunately, inclement weatherprevented this ideal situation. Due to the constant rainsand the hrgh clay content of the suzface material, it wouldhave to be wet-sieved. Unfortunately, neirher the time northe equipment were available for this ur.derraking in thefield. The entire surface of the hill was scrapped, baggedand shipped to the St. Lawrence Geology Department where itwould later be wet-sieved properly. The excavatron was thenundertaken. Despite removing many cubic meters of sediment
centimeter by centimeter with trowel and trenching tool, noadditional material was recovered.
The materral which had been shipped to St.. Lawrence waswet sieved. It was quickly learned tnat th considerableclay content prevented proper wet sieving. As a result, thematerral was wasl'ed before sieving witt warm water and asmall amount of Calgon. After sieving, rhe debris wastirvrded into two portions, a finer green srze 2 3 mm! which wouldcontain preces of bone f om the sate. After drying, the
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
15/72
was packed through to find any preces of
=:fter all the shipped material had been wet sreved and
eked through, the bone was examined for any matches wrthotner pieces of bone. If any matches were found, the pieceswere carefully glued together. The bone material was thenexamined.
The bone contained within the concretion found was
carefully cracked free from its confinement. Unfortunately,
some material was lost from the bone as a result of thecracking of the very hard concretion. Next, excessconcretronary material was cut away with the use of a dremeltool and a dramond blade. The bone was then examined.
Fortunately, the teeth, scute, and metacarpal requiredno cleaning or preparationor where already prepared. They
were carefuliy examrned for any distinguishing featureswhich may be used for their proper identification. Thisprocess was greatly aided by drawing illustrations andcareful measurement.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
16/72
PREVIOUS WORKS
The Mosasauridae were an interesting Family ofscca. ory marine lizards which exzsted du i c the
Cretaceous. Mosasrapid evolution, "...tsucceeded zn estayears, as tCretaceoucontemporS li 199
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
17/72
Ti.e story about the first discovery of a mosasaur is avery fr terestingone. In1780, 42 vears before theciscove y of the first dinosaur fossil, the first mosasaurfos 11 was found by quarrymen, in Cretaceous rocks, 90 feetbe w St. Peters Mount in Maastricht, Holla. d Russell,
1967!. Dr. Hoffman, a surgeon who lived in Maastricht,examined the skull and vertebral column and also directedthe excavation Russell, 196'7!. The first complication inthe Maastricht mosasaur's story occu red when a clergyman
.=-. ec Goddin, whose land the fossil had been found on,clair:,ed the fossil as his own rather than allow it to beexamined and described by Hoffman Russell, 1967!. Due toits unique character, the fossil soon attracted a degree offame. Nnen the French laid si.ege on Maasnr'cht in 1795, thecommanding officer of the French Republicordered that the
artillery avoid Goddin's house obviously to avoid damagingthe fossil and so that it could be taken back with them to
France Russell, 1967!. Goddin anticipated the Frenchinterest in the fossil and hid it in the town Russell,
1967!. Despite Goddin's best attempts at hiding themosasaur, it was found and sent to Pa~is where it stillresides in the Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle
Russell, 1967!. In 1808, Cuvier reexamined the fossil anddecided it was related to the varanid lizards Russell,
1967!. Other experts of the period haci dizferent ideasabout tl.e oss ' origin. Pierre Camp r and Van Harumthought ihe Maastrich mosasaur wa cerace n, Faujas Saint
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
18/72
was - crocodrle, and Adrien Camper sharedrha- ir. was a lizard. It would be ten year
818! reexaminatron of the Maastrrchtrhe frrst mosasaur would be discovered rnNcrrc .=.:..aries zn the Cretaceous of New Jersey by Mitchrll
1967!. Mitchill correctly recognized hrs fossilbern similar to the Maastricht mosasaur Russell, 1967!.
Mosasaurs were platynotan lizards and had evolved from=:. "'"" e Cretaceous aigialosaurs, whrch were varanoids thats' are many similar cranial characteristics with mosasaursour. rhezr post-cranial morphology was more similar to theVaranus lrzards which are alive today rn Australia andAfrica Russell, 1967! "The skull is nearly, in everyrespect, of the pattern of the Varanidae...," Baur, 1890!,The Varanidae and Mosasauridae both have an articulatzng
joint in the middle of their rami Baur, '890!. "Among thediverse irving groups rncluded in the I acertilia, mosasaursresemble the varanids or monitor lizards most closely, afact that has been generally recognized since the beginningof the nrneteenth century," Russell, 1964, p. I!.
The varanids are a very old group of reptrles goingback at least to the Jurassic Williston, 1904!. Thed sccverv of Arazalosauridae and Dolrchosauridae in theearly la er Cretaceous of England and Yugoslavia helpeddevelop a mos- =- r nd lizard assocrarion b cause they both
possesse- vararorc characteristrcsdecided tha mc =- azrs could not h
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
19/72
dclichcsaurs '" cause of the greater numbe of cervicalthe dolichosaurs Russell, 1967!
icicnall v, ihe aigialosaurs, opeti.osaurs, and mosasaurs'iffer from the moni.tora in that they have seven ~ertebraein their necks a characteristic no othez reptiles possesWilliston, 1904!. The aigialosaurs, to strengthen the
case, have all the intermediate traits whi.ch link themosasaurs to the monitors Williston, 1914!.
Ncsasaurs belong to the Order Souamata, which isdescribed as: "A single, upper temporal vacuity, or,secondarily none; quadrate loosely articulated with cranium;teeth on palate; intercentra more or less persistent; asingle coracoid; ribs single-headed, central," Williston,1914, p. 17!. One very distinguishing feature of thisOrder, which makes up a majority of all 1'ving reptiles, is
its members have overlapping dermal scales Williston,1914!. Osborn, after studying the mosasaurs, decided thatmosasaurs were an ancient offshoot of the Lacertilia
Russell, 1967!. The Lacertilia are described aspossessir,g: "Continuity of the parietal and sphenoid wallsinterrupted. Rami of the mandible united by suture," Cope,1864, p. 224!. "Ancestral mosasaur" seem to have been oftwo basic ypes; forms with long bodies and short dilatedtails giving zi.se to the mosasaurines, anci forms with shortbodies and iona pointed tails giving rise to theplioplatecarpi. es and tylosaurines," Russo 1, 1967!.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
20/72
10
e dave'oped the Order, Pyzhonomorpha,ncluszon of mosasaurs Russell, 1967!
r'ginally, in Cope's Pythonomorpha andafter examin.ing the characteristics for Cope's
deca ed . osasaurs could not be separated from the;R .sse'1, 1967! . Leidy liked the idea of a separate
cf ept'les for the mosasaurs but he did not like the"Py honomorpha" Russell, 1967!. Eventually, Marsh
and ned the term and put the suborder Mosasauria in the
Lace tilia based on, "the presence of a sternum, fore and'mw , anzi the absence of palatine teeth," Russell,
1907,p. 9!.Presently, there are three recognized subfamilies of
Mosasauzidae: the Mosasaurinae, the Plioplatecarpinae, andthe Tylosauzinae Russell, 1967!. The Mosasaurinae is
composed of three tribes: the Mosasaur z , theGlobidensini, and the Plotosaurini Russell, 1967!. The
Plioplatecarpinae is composed of two trzbes: thePlioplatecarpini, and the Pzognathodontznz and theTylosaurznae has no tribes Russell, 1967!. Presently,there are approxzmately thirteen genera and thirty speciesof mosasaurs Russell, 1967!. The Tribe MosasauriniGervazs, 1653! Russell, 1967 has "Twelve or less pygal
vertebrae present. Radius and ulna widelv separated bybzicge or carp- za on distal border of az tebzachazlforamen," Pus e' , 1967, p. 124!. The Mosasaurini arecomposed oz the genera Clidastes Cope, LBBB, Mosasaurus
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
21/72
11
Cc- -ease, 322, .aurpnekepuhis Mehl, 1930, and tzodon Owen,little is known about the osteology of the Trrbe
dansant Dollo, 1924! Russell, 1967. However, it rsbe eoarate from the Mosasaurinr due to itssp' erical teeth Russell, 1967!. This tribe is
c" prised of the genus Globidens Gilmore, 1912. Russellibes the Tribe Plotosaurini as having, "More than
'''elve pygal vertebrae present. Radius and ulna nearlycontact above carpalia on distal border of antebrachial
fora..cn," Russell, 1967, p. 145!. Based on differences in!.e ...anus, the Plotosaurini are separated in a unique trzbe
from the rest of the Mosasaurinae Russell, 1967!. The
Plotosaurrnr is composed of the generaPlotosaurus Camp,1951, Compressidens Dollo, 1924, and Taniwhasaurus Hector,1874.
Within the Plioplatecarpinae, the TribePlioplatecarpinr Dollo, 1884! Russell, 1967, has a "Canalthrough basrocczprtal and basisphenoid for basilar artery.Delrcately proportioned jaws, teeth striated and subcircularin cross-section. Chevrons free. These are generallymosasaurs of moderate size, with relatively short jaws andlong, slender teeth," Russell, 1967, p. 148!. This tribeis made cp of the genera Piatecarpus Cope, 1869,:ctenos urus Merrian, 1894, and Piiopiatecarpus Dollo, 1882Rus el', 1967!. The Prognathociontini Russell, 1967, has a
"Deep gros:e '..: oo of basroccrpital anc basrsphenoid forhastier artery. Ma sivelv proportior ed jaws, teeth faceted
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
22/72
12='": -1 in crcaudal centra," Russell, 1967, p. 162!
the Prognatodontini appear plioplatecarpine butmore massive and have correspondingly larger
R"ssell, 1967!. The Prognathodontini is composedoenera Pzognathodon Dollo, 1889, and Plesdotylosaurus
1942 Russell, 1967!. There are some genera of thePlioplatecarprnae which have an uncertain tribal affiliation
specifically, Halisaurus Marsh, 1869, and Dollosauzus
Takovlev, 1901. The subfamily Tylosaurinae is its own tribeand is composed of the generaTylosauzus Marsh, !872, andHainosauzus Dollo, 1885 Russell, 1967!. Theze are many
species of mosasaurs which have uncertain taxonomicplacement Russell, 1967! and this information can causeconfusion when studying the literature.
The Maastzicht mosasaur went unnamed for quite sometime. party-two years after its discovery, the fossil wasgiven the generic name Mosasaurus Russell, 1967!. Over theyears, the trzvzal name belgicus, camperz, giganteus, andhoffmanni where also applied Russell, 1967!. Mantell, in1828, determined that Mosasaurus hoffmanni was the earliestname applied to the Maastricht mosasaur Russell, 1967!. Asa result, Mosasauzushofrmanni Mantell, 1828, became the
Mosasaurus genotype Pezsson, 1959!. in 1830, a mosasaurwas dzscovered zn the Missouri territory which was described
by Harlan and ".old uss and was named by Harlan asIchthyo eurus ...:ssourzensis Russell, 1967!. Later, t.hzs
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
23/72
13
bechanged toMosasaurus missou iensis Russell,:: e species Mosasaurus dekayi was esrabli.shed from a
ie cro n of a tooth from New Jersey Russell, 1967! and
ge us Ciidasteswasestablished on a single dorsal
ebr-'868K!.Mosasaurs were interesting and fz gl teningcreatures.Often, zheirnature of appearancehas spawned i.deas ofseamonsters existing in the pzesent day. 'Take, for example
:his passaae:he sea serpents,or mosasaurs, grew to be as much as
40 feet long. They had scales like a s ake. Their jaws also had hingesor joints, one at the middle ofthe chin and two at eachside,which allowed themouthto gape very widely, and to swallo very largeanimals. On the other hand, unlike snakes, theypossessed small limbs in the form of ' ve f' ngeredflippers. It is interesting to note that theseseaserpents died outabout thesame tir:.e that thelivingcoelacanth was previously thought to have becomeextinct, so that it is hard to deny completelythai.r possible existence in the sea roc!ay. Smith,1956!
Mosasaurs, which swam with axial sub-und ations of theposterior portion of the body usingtheir flippersandneck for equilibriumandsteering Lingham-Soli.ar,1991!,did look a lot like the sea serpents of lore but thereis no
doubt they became extinct like the dinosaurs.Although Marsh and Copearecredited with proving
mosasaurs had flippers, a man named Herma n Schlegel 804-1884! ','== he " : o make the d' cover; ..41 publish theresults ;N 'der .-.=' heunissen, lo86,'. Sc! egel,who was
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
24/72
o" the Rijksmuseum van Maturli7ke Historic insade the discovery in 1854 Nulder and Theunissen,Rreviously, mosasaurs had been thought to have beenwalk on land. Schlegel proved this theory incorrect
xam. ning the mosasaur phalanges and noticing a lack ofattachments for muscles or tendons the opposite of what issee. in land animals Mulder and Theunissen, 1986!.
The cranium of a mosasaur is an interesting de~i.ce.Cver the coarse of their evolution, the mosasaurian cranium
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
25/72
15
presence of calcified tympanrc membranes has beened as being an indrcatron of deep-sea divrng they
unco for submarine hearing and protection of the::.". annal ear from sudden pressure changes Vaughn andawson, 1956!. Many people believe calcified tympanic
membranes are a characteristic of Plioplatecarpus and thattneir presence is diagnostic of the monogeneric familyPl'oplatecarpidae Vaughn and Dawson, 1956!. Evidence ofcalcif'ed tympanic membranes can be seen in some specimens
Gr Platecarpus especially one specimen of Platecarpvsictericusl from the Niobrara of Kansas Vaughn and Dawson,19561. It is certain that Plioplarecarous nad calcifiedtympanic membranes and that Williston found tnem inI'ylosaurus but there is no further direc evidence of themoccurring in other mosasaurs Vaughn and Dawso , 1956!.
Perhaps, althoughrare!y preserved, a. calcifiedtympanic membrane was a structure commeven all mosasaurs! perhaps the membran
mosasaurs in which ituncalcified cartilage.have been a pathologage. Vaughn and DaMosasaurs, ir North America, lived 'n ihe
epicontinental sea which covered the interior of the
cor.trnent. "Mosasaurs inhabited
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
26/72
informatics, the Smoky Hill MD rota was deposzted z
..nfav"rable conditions for bottom creatures Seven,
Cc-:.parazzve1y little rs known about immature.-..osasau s and, although only a few young mosasaurs are known
d Sheldon, 1986! they are known from approximatelyformations in the United States of America Sheldon,
1993!. It has been suggested that they lived in fresh waterspecifzcally, rivers! and this might have had an influence
on thezr preservation Camp, 1942!.Mosasaurs are known throughout the wozld. They are
known from Antarctica, Niger Lingham-Soliaz, 1991!,England, Belgium, Russia, France, New Jersey, Georgia,Alabama, Mississippi, Texas, New Mexico, Colorado, Kansas,
Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nyomir g and otherlocalitres in the United States of America Williston, 1914,
Camp, 1942!. Unfortunately, most mosasaur material is notvery effective when used in a stratigraphic context duecrushed and fragmentary condrtion most are found in Camp,1942!. It is known, however, that they only occur in the
Upper Cretaceous and that, "The earliest occur in beds ofUpper Cenomzan aqe rn Kent, where only fragmentary specimensare known," Camp, 1942, p. 1!. Local genera of mosasaursare not wide-ranqing Camp, 1942! and this fact, no doubt,!' as an znfluet ca on their effectzveness as a stratigraphrctool. Mosasaur =- . ssouruensis was found in "a hard bluish
gray lzmestone, he " th junctron of he Yellow-stone and
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
27/72
sess" Harlan, 1834, p. 440!. Mosasaurs are
tbe Nzobrara of Kansas, whne animals in the world, a
Sha = ' : aze not seen in the Niobrara of South Dakota
ozobab'y a result of poor exposures of the Niobrara in thesta'e Sevon, 1957!. In 1957, Clddastes tortor, wasrecovered from the South Dakota Niobrara approximately
een feet below the Niobrara/Pierre contact Sevon,
19 ;,!. A Platecazpus wasrecovered from the Upper Niobraranear inton, North Dakota ailliston, 1902!. An undescribed
spec es of Plioplatecazpus was discovered in the SharonSprr. gs Member of the Pierre Shale of Nyoming Burnham,1992!.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
28/72
AGES AND LOCATIONS
nresence of Mtooth, most likely isP. primaevus butlink between Newevidence of a waterwavdekayi provides
Jersey and North Dakota and an argument " n ne made that the
tooth belongs toP.depressus. At least, tI e presenthe ge:us .='icp'aecarpus is known in =.". Ti=-.ber Lakof the .ox Bi =-. .he rwo mosasauriar ::=-" ebrae recovered
IS
exa..inst on of the stratigraphic occurrences of thefossils examined in this paper reveals range extensions andan increase in geographic occurrences or all of the fossils.
Previously,Mosasaurus dekayi was known from theMaastrichti.an aged Dorf and Fox, 1957! Navesink Formation
of New Jersey Russell, 1967!. The discovery of the M.dekayi in this paper extended the geographic range to BowmanCounty, North Dakota and increases the sr atigraphic rangero the Timber Lake Member of the Fox Bills Formati.on alsoMaastrichtianl. The Plioplatecarpus sp. provides aninteresting questions. It could possibly be of twodifferent species Plioplatecarpus orimaevus Russell, 1967orP.depressus Cope, 1869.Pli oplatscarpus primaevus isknown from the DeGrey Member, Campania . aced Bunker, et.al, 1988!, of the Lower Pierre Shale or Souci' DakotaRussell, 1967!. Plioplatecarpusdepre s is known from
the Navesink of New Jersey Russell, 1967!. Unfortunately,
the incomplete nature of the tooth and . he lack of any other
material prevenrs proper identificatio" o the fossil. The
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
29/72
19
" mber Lake Member support the presence cf :rs r he Fox Hills
e..:s Basilemys was first seen in the Judith Riverana and Canada Hay, 1908!. It has been
rec :e =-.' rc..: the Timber Lake Member of the Fox Hills:.-= ..aticn of South Dakota Bouchard, 1990!. Its presence in
Dakota represent.s a geographic link between theMor;sana/Canada and South Dakota localities. The speciesB.
sinuosa Riggs 1906, has been found in association with
Triceratops, Trachodon, and other Laramie fossils Hay,1908! providing further fossil evidence of themarine/deltaic transitional paleoenvironmental setting ofthe I'ox Hills Formation. The presence of the Tyrannosaurid
tooth, a terrestrial fossrl, further supports the notion theterrestrial link to the Fox Hills paleoenvironments.
Tyrannosaurs I'. rex! are known from the overlaying HellCreek Formation. The tooth's presence in the Timber LakeMember of the Fox Hills Formation provid s a stratigraphicrange extension down from the Hell Creek.
No signifrcant stratigraphic rnformation can be derivedfrom the fragmental and incomplete reptilran fossrls. Allare anterpreted as being marine faunas and they providecontinued evidence of the transitronal nature of the FoxHills. Perhaps, they will be identified and their exactvalue to the knowledge of the Fox Halls will be quantified.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
30/72
21
c.:s, maroonish shale approximately 1 footth clayier lzthologies hrgher
;appz ximately25 feet!
cement.ed, fine to medium grained, purplesandstone which thine laterally.
:nourated, brown weathering, fine, laminated,'azk brown, silty sandstone interpreted as
berng channel fall. Upper 1 footbentonitic/bentonite. Capped by Unit 6.
n'ndurated, buff weathering, fine to very fine,ferrugineous, slightly resistent lamir ated,
25'+
0'5"
1'10"
0 lignaceous salty sandstone.X3 Unrndurated, fine to very fine, uba..euler to
angular, buff weathering, orange-tan
1'0"
salty-clayey sandstone grading upward toI greenish gray, laminated, micaceous,
31'
a=icy sancsro e with la ge scale t ougn crossbed ' nc. Indurared un ts are lease' 5 in nature
silty-clayey sandstone. Pod of garosize ?lobserved 3 feet from top of the unit . arneOphiomorpha common on restricted hor'zona.Large Ophiomorpha observed 25 feet frc. case ofthe unrt. Topped by lignitic, laminated, siltysandstone. Large Ophiomorpha sugge t onditions
becoming estuarine upward.2* Indurated, frne to medium grained, suoangular,
b: =" weazherrng, micaceous, lamrnazed, an,
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
31/72
22
:=- 'era lv ' o unindurated sands of a
co-,-osit'on. Occasional Ophiomorpha areindurated unrt. Lower contact
3'1"
rated, fine to very fine, subangular tobuff weathering, tan, laminated,
silty-clayey sandstone. Small tosmall Ophfomorpha are seen but are rare.
Un't g ades upward into Unit 2. 2'7"
65'total thickness
Note: The section bindurated ledge in tFormation. The basby valley fill. Therefore, the entire thHills has not been measured.
Section at Locality A1050
westward-facing gully on a large slump block with a small
stream incision, T. 130 N., R. 106H.,Sec. 24, Bowman
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
32/72
23
feet andinches!
ake Member
rated upwardsUnrndurated, buff-tan weathering, brown clay
lenses of sandstone and dark black! clay.:o .er contact gradational.
Ur:ndurated, dark brown weatherina, da kbrown-black clay. Grades into Unrr 5.
3 Unrndurated, fine to very fine, angular tosubangular, buff weathering, tan, siltysandstone. Presence of Ophiomorpha sug estedby small piece of tunnel. Pods of 'arc ite ?!observed
2 Unindurated, dark gray wearherinc, gray to black
1'3"
0'2.5"
0'3.5"
clay with popcornesgue weatberirucharacteristics. Thine larerall 0'0.5"
1 Unindurated, fine to verv fire, anc:lar tosubangular, buff we-=bering, an, '=-=..:.":.=":ed,silty sandstone. 3'4.5"
5'9"total theet ess
Slump Block Mc. ". ;:- = = s 'a2!
rat-ci, buff weathering, dark gray clay 0'4"
incurs-ed, buff weathering, broone whfch becomes more cl
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
33/72
Thickness
!feet andLaches!
5:lls FormationTrmber Lake Member
' nit
23* Indurated, fine to very fine, buff weathering,tan, micaceous, silty sandstone withlaminations and trough crossbedding. Lensoidin nature and grading laterally into sandswith similar compositions and containingOphiomorpha no Ophiomorpha in indurated
portion!. Lower contact gradational.22 Unindurated, fine to very fine,buff
weatherrnq, angular to subangular stronglylaminated, tan, silty-clayey sandstone withlenses of light brown to dark brown clays,
grades upwards into unit 23.21 Indurated, fine, brown weathering, purple Mn02
0'9"
Bt3
0'2.5"cemented sandstone20 Unindurated, brown-buff weathering, dark brown
clay with lenses of silty sandstone.5"-I" thick!.
19 Unindurated, fine to very fine, angular tosubangular, buff weathering, tan, strongly
1 .inated, aritysandstone withthin lenses of
0'3"
clay.Possible microchannelfallsand5'ss le1'2"user =-= on inoles observed
IB U. ' =.=-:=== "', bro- n-* -ff weatne" nc, da k browncl=-, "= ='=. -': ==- :ate ally ,''ensoi"' .n nature!.0'1"
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
34/72
Fegu e 1.-- St ratzgrap'nicCelur.e -: S te '= ".SST. 13
e 's Se". 2-'l
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
35/72
2G
.=':.=ared, fine to very fine, buffweathering, ran, silty sandstone.:nincurated, buff-brown weathering, dark brown
0'2"
0'1,5"cl v15 Unindurated, fine to very fine, buff
weathering, laminated, angultan, silty sandstone.
14 Unindurated, gray weathering, dark gray clay
1'0"
13 Uz indurated, fine to very fine, laminated, buff0'1"weathering, tan, silty sandstone.
12 Unindurated, gray weathering, dark gray clay0'0.5"which thine laterally.
11 Unindurated, fine to very fine, subangulaz to
angular, laminated, buff weathering, ra.,silty sandstone.
10 Unindurated, buff-gray weathering, dark gray
0'10.5"
clay which thine laterally lensoid in nature. 0'2"9 Unindurated, fine to very fine, buff
weathering, tan, silty sandstone.
8 Uninduzated, buff-brown weathering, brown-darkbrown clay. Highest observed occurrence offossil reptile remains.
7 Un'ndurated, fine to very fine, angul r tosubangular, buff weathering, tan, siltysan" stone '" "'.-. ine 1am nations.
0'1.5"
0'2"
1'1"
6 Uninctrazed, - :: weathering, gray-dark gray
which thine laterally, lensoid in nature. 0'0.5"
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
36/72
27
0'2"
rated, buff-brown weathering, brown-orange-:'"-stone grading upwards into uninduratedsilty clay. 0'5"
4 Unindurated, buff weathering,3 Unindurated, fine to very fine,
weathering, orange-tan, silty-clayey sandstone.0'2.5"2 Uz ndurated, fine to very fine, buff
weathering, dark gray clay. 0'l.5"
1 iJnindurated, fine to very fine, angular tosubangular, buff weathering, tan, siltysandstone. Pods of jarosite ?! observed. 0'10"
total t..'' c.cn ss 9'3.5"
composrte total hick. ess 13'2"
Section at Locality 2
Cut bank of Seven sil reekcr.:but ="; consists of aSs -sc loN., B. 106 N., Sec. 25Foot Block Fio: re 2l
Thickness
feet and
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
37/72
rnches!
Sim'lar in texture and appearance to Unit 8 butnot indurated buff weathering, fine to veryfine, tan, silty sandstone, with lamrnations.Trough crossbedding present. Outcrop capped byvalley fill.
8 Similar in texture and appearance to Unit 6buzf-brown weathering, but sand/clayir terbedding appears to occur in closer
8' 10'
6'-7intervals.
14' 5"
tan-orange, laminated sandstone witlinterbeddings Mn08/clay layers. A possiblebentonite layer was observed. Grades upwardinto sandstone of similar lithology wh'ch isbioturbated and contains Ophi omorpha. Lo''ercontact gradatronal.
5 Unrnd rated, fane to very fine, buff weathering,
gr yish-tan, lamrnated, silty sandstone. Grades
0' ll"
1' 10"ento nrr 6.
7- Loosely indurated, fine to very fine, buffweathering, lensoid, tan, silty sandstone which
grades laterally into unindurated sar detune withthe same lithology. Ophdomorpha and ' argecrossbedding are present. Interfingers, in a
step-wise manne , with brown units Mn08 andclayl 10" to 1' thick.6 Unindurated, fine to very fine, buff weathering,
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
38/72
29
:rated, fine to very fine, buff weathering,
;.: osseous, laminated, tan, silty sandstone whzch.:=-=beds wath dark brown fissile clay layers 1
4 inches thick. Pods of jarosite ?!obsezved. Capped by a 0.5" indurated, brownweathering, fine to very fine, brown, siltysandstone with Mn02.
3 Uninourated, fine to very fine, buff weathering,laminated, tan to brown., silty sandstone with
nodules of dazk brown clay. Interbeddings ofclay become more common towards the top of theunit.
0I3 5
7' 1"
1 Unindurated, fine to very fine, b
laminated, tan, sandstone with idark clay. Small pods of jarosite ! present.Grades upward into a lensoid, indurared unitwith similar compositzon. Capped by Unit 2. 3' 8"
total thickness 53' 3.5"
Hanging Block Figure 2!Pie re Shaleand
Thickness
!feet andinches!
Fox Hills "or .atzo
Unit
2 Unindurated, brown weathering, dark brown clay. 0' 1"
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
39/72
30
nd-rated, fine to very fane, buff weathering,d, tan, silty sandstone wrth >aroszte
gods and interbeddrngs of clay lenses.Capped by lensoid, indurated sandstones ofsrmilar composition which exhibit trough crossbecioing. Clay beds 1"-1.5" thick are seen.approximately 6-6.5 feet from the bottom of theunit. Ophfomozpha present below and lateral totne indurated .unit but are not very common. 8'5"
Unzndurated, light gray to gray weaihering, darkg ay to gray clayey siltstone with pods of
jarosite ?!, interbeddings of fine, lami atedsandstone and shale towards top. Sraoes intoUnzt 2. 30'3"
total thi kne s 38' 8"
composite total ti ckness 91' 3.5"
Specimens from site OY3 where take".. rom the IronLightnrng contact in the Fox Hills Format'on in EmmonsCounty T. 132 N., R. 75 W., Sec. 1 . H fer to Figure 3 fora generalized stratigraphic placement of he contact.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
40/72
33
Site 1
Site A1050
Figu e 2.--Stratrgrap33ic Correlation of S' es 1, A1050, & 2 Sr e 2
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
41/72
32
HELL CREEK FM.
LiN ON MBR
m
0Ill
CL'
0u'X0
LUm
TRAIL CITY MBRPIERRE SHALE
Figure 3. Strat2.graphic Column showing ron Lightning/Fox
Ha.lls Ccntaci an ' s. atigraphrc level of si e OY3 T. 132N. R. 3 W. Sec. Emmons Count .'""=.-. Dakota .
00IL
0Z
Z cs'z I0 gZ~0
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
42/72
SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY
CLASS ReptiliaSUBCLASS Lepidosauria
ORDER SquamataSUBORDER Lacertilia
FAMILY Mosasaridae Gervais 1853SUBFAMILY Mosasaurinae Williston 1897
GENUS Mosasaurus Conybeare 1822teat . usually prismatic with relatively flat
x. Da and ro:nded internal surfaces," Russell, 1967!SPECIES Mosasaurus dekayi Bronn 1838
Referred specimen. KS Specimen, single marginal tooth.Collected by R.M. Feldmannn at site OY3, T. 132 N., R. 75W., Sec. 1, Emmons County, North Dakota.
Diagnosis and Description. This tooth is 4.2 cm tall, 1.9cm wide, and 1.6 cm thick. The tooth is d'vided into
buccal Figure 4! and lingual Figure 5! sides by aprominent longi.rudinal carina Figure 6!. The buccal sideis nearly flat having a slight curvature! and is dividedinto four facets by fairly distinct carinae Figure 4!. Asone looks at the tooth as it seen in Figure 4, the widths oftie facets from left to right are: 0.3 cm, 0.4 cm, 0.6 cm,and 0.85 cm. The lingual side possesses a. strong curvatureand i.s divided into ten facets by fa'rlv cistinct carinaeFigure 5!. Referring to Figure 5, the widths of the facets
from left to right are: 0.65 cm, 0.4 cm, 0.3 cm, 0.3 cm,
33
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
43/72
0.4 cm, 0.3 cm, 0.4 cm, 0.4 cm, and 0 .5 cm. Onhe buccal and lzngual sides, the facets are their
v szons begin to smooth closer to the tip untilapproxzmately one third to one quarter of the tooth issmooth and lacking facets.
Due to the size and curvatures of the lzngual andbuccal sides, the tooth is nearly triangular in crosssection. An examination of the base of the tooth Figure 4!reveals a nerve cavity which is approximately 1 cm deep.
Discussion. Based on the broken enamel and uneven naturec rhe base, the marginal tooth has been interpreted ashaving been lost before it could be replaced Figures 4,5 &6!. The tooth zs posterzorily recurved and the tip isbroken off most probably due to wear. Using the number offacets on the buccal and lingual side of the tooth and its
morphology and a diagram and description of a known74.
dekayf Figure 7! Russell, 1994!, the tcoth has beenidentified as Mosasaurus dekayi.Stratzgraphzc Ievel ard Age.-- Thzs toot!. was collectedfrom the Timber Lake/Iron Lightning Member boundry of theFox Hills Formation. It is Maastrichtian in age.
CLASS ReptiliaSUBCLASS Lepidosauria
ORDER Squamata
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
44/72
Bigure -'..-- Mosasa "usdekayi,KS specznen, site OY3. ScaleA. :- seal sade. B. Base o= tooth
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
45/72
Fig re . Mosasaosus dekayi,KSspeczm .,szte OY3.Scale ha"s cm. .'.:co=eel she. B. Tp of tooth.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
46/72
:rgure 6. Mosasaurus deka',
BS specrmea, sate OY3. Scale bar-s cru S de vre..s of the tooths..o' l..c 'o .o t"dr:al carrnaeA. B' ca t 'ot.B. Bucc 1to left
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
47/72
38
/
nisei ~ *5'- 8
Fsgure 7. Yc ese "us ceksyz, illustsu ' - . c: knownspec nen !tecec Fccc gussell, 1994!.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
48/72
SUBORDER Lac rtiliaFAMILYMosasari dae Gervais 1853
SUBFAMILY Plioplatecarpinae Dollo 1884TRIBE Plioplatecarpini Dollo 1884GENUS Plioplatecarpus Dollo 1882
"Mandibular teeth bicarinate ?!, vertically striated andmedially recurved Dollo, 1882, p. 64; 1889b, pl. 10 fig.14" Russell, 1967!.
Referred Specimen.-- NDGS specimen, szngle fragment of atooth collected by Dr. John Hoganson approximately one milenorth of site A1050.
Diagnosis and Description. The tooth fragment is 1.4 cmtall, 0.7 cm wide, and 0.5 cm thick Figures 8 & 9!. Twolongrtudznal carinae are faintly visible ',Figure 10!. The
tzp and base of the have been broken of probably due toloss before replacement.Discusszon. The very small size of ti.e tooth makesidentzfzcation dzfficult. After rt was ciiscovered by JohnHoganson, it was taken to Dr. Gorden Be 1, Jr. whoidentified it as belonging to the Genus " iopiatecazpusDollo 1882. It may belong to the species Plzopiatecarpusprimaveus Russell, 1967 which is known from the DeGreyMember of the lower Pierre Shale of South Dakota Russell,1967!. The rooth is nterpreted to have been broken, andsubsequently lost, d e to wear based on: he strarght break
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
49/72
40
Figure B.--P1ioplatecarpus sp., DGSspecime., recovered approximately 1 mile from siteAltg.. Sca'e bar is1 cm.A. Buccal srde. B. Frp of too
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
50/72
Figure 9. Blioplatecarpus sp., NDGS specimen,recovered approximately 1 mile from site A1050. Scalebar is 1 cm.A. Langual s de. B. Base of tooth.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
51/72
Figure 10.-- Pdropi.atecarpus sp., NDGS specimen, recoveredapproximately 1 mrle from site A1050. Scale bar is 1 cm.Side vre. s of rocth showing very faint longitudinal carinae.A. Buccal to = cht. B. Buccal to left.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
52/72
seen on the base of the specimen, the missing tap, and theex namely worn longrtudanal carrnae.Stratigraphic level and Acre.-- This tooth was recovered:rom the Timber Lake Member of the Fox Hills Formation, Itis Maastrichtian in age.
ORDER SguamataSUBORDER Lacertilia
FAMILY Mosasauridae Gervaas 1853
Re ar ed spacemen.-- SLU No. 1833, single vertebra.Collected by J. Mark Erickson at A131, T. 128 N., R. 80 N.,Sec. 6, Sroux County, North Dakota.
Diagnosis and Description. -- The vertebra is 2 cm wide 3 1cm tall, and 2.3 cm thick. Both articu sting surfaces aresmooth and a slaghtly raised ridge may be seen on the upper
portion of the fossil fpz.gare ll!Discussion.-- This vertebra was recovered from a
Dosiniopsis pod by J. Mark Erickson and 'dentified by Dr.Gorden Bell Jr. as belongrng to some kind of a mosasaur.
Stratigraphic level and Age. -- The vertebra is from theTimber Lake Member of the Fox Hills Formation and is
Maastrrchtian an age.
ORDER SguamataSUBORDER LacertrlzaFAMILYMosasauradae
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
53/72
I',g 'op.Figure j'. ."..""= =': eertecra, S'g Yo. 1B33, srte A131Scale bar
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
54/72
Figure 2. Nosasaur vertebra, SLU No. 1834, T. 132 N., R.78 W., Sec 3, :-. .=,.=-.. Cou. ty, North Dakcta. Scale bar is 1cm.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
55/72
46
specimen. SLU No. 1B34, single vertebra.llected by J. Mark Erickson at the northeast corner ofi32 N., R. 78 W., Sec. 3, 9 miles west and I/2 mile north
of Linton, Emmons County, North Dakota.Diagnosis andDescription.-- The vertebra is 4.5 cm tall,3.4 cm wide, and 3.9 cm thick fpigure 12!. It has asomewhat pear-shaped cross section and has a raised edgeimilar to the previous vertebra.'acus i on.-- This fossil has been identified as a mosasaur
based on its similar morphology with the previous vertebraidentified by Dr. Gorden Bell Jr. Unfortunately, thisvertebra is in not as good condition as the other because itwas damaged when the concretion it was in was cracked open.The bone also appears to have been fairly worn previous toits incorporation as the core for the concretion.
Apparently, the vertebra was free to roll around on theocean bottom for some time.
Stratigraphic Level and Age. This vertebra was collectedfrom the upper Timber Lake Member of the Fox HillsFormatron. It is Maastrrchtian in age.
INFRACIASS ArchosauromorphaSUPERORDER Archosauria
ORDER CrocodyliaSUBORDER Eosuchia
FAMILY CrocodylidaeSUBFAMILY Crocodylinae
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
56/72
Figure 13.--Zl edpos" caus sp., KS spec'.-.. =, site OY3. Scalebar is 1 cre A. -=- rae .. B. Base c: Got?.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
57/72
Frgure 14.-- ieoyosuchus sp., KS spec me , ite QY3. Scalebar is cr... '. .=.re or ried,. B. Tip o-. oath.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
58/72
50
SUBCLASS TestudinataORDER Chelonia
SUBORDERCryptodi ra SUPERFAMILY TrionychozdaeFAMILY Dezmatemydzdae
GENUS Basiiemys Hay, 1902
"Shell highly sculptured. Epiplasrra much thickened.Bridge wade. Intergular scutes present. Pectorals greatlyex assed at the midline, narrowed laterally. An axillarya c an ngu0nal scute but no other ir. ra,arginals....Thisgenu cif ers from other known genera o De matemydidiae inhavi a no inframarginals, except the axi lary and theinguinal, " IHay, 1908! .Referzed specimen.-- KS Specimen, cern scute collected by
R.M. Feldmannn at site OY3, T. 132 N., R. 78 N., Sec. 1,Emmons County, North Dakota
Dzagnosis and Desc iption. -- The fr- c:e t is approximately4.3 cm long, 2 cm wide, and 2 cm tall. It . ss a veryconvoluted, bumpy surface and has twc ta 1, cone-shapeduprazszngs with well defined tips IFzgu Sl. The bone isfairly solid zn appearance and sturdy zn s zucture.Di scr ss ~ on. This piece was identizzed by Dz . JohnHoganson as bezng a dermal scute f o,. the e bow or knee ofsasi le...ys sp. based on direct compari on ', th a speczmenfrom the vzell '-''seu.... The two cone-1' ze sr zres with theturtle's carapace, = astzon, and other scares, no doubt
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
59/72
Sl
Figure 13.-- Basilemys sp. dermal scute, KS specimen, siteQY3. Scale bar s - cm. A. Side view. B. Top view.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
60/72
some: har efzective defense and protection fromthe wears and rears of daily life.* evel and Age. This fragment was collectedz Lake/Iron Lightning Member contact in the
.ation. It is Maastrichtian in age.
CLASS ReptiliaSUBCLASS Archosauria
ORDER Saurischia
SUBORDER TheropodiaINFRAORDER CarnosauriaFAMILY Tyrannosauridae
Referred specimen.-- KS Specimen, tooth rragment collectedby R.M. Feldmann at site OY3, T. 132 N., R. 75N.,Sec. 1,
Emmons County, North Dakota.Diagnosis and Description.-- The piece is approximately 2.6cm tall, .8 cm wide, and .7 cm thick. Fart of the lateral
carina i.s present Figure 16!. The enamel i smooth andlacks any indication of longitudinal o :azeral division.Discussior.-- The tooth was identified by Phil Curry of the
Tyrell Museum as a Tyrannosaurid based on he serration onzhe carina. The piece appears to be fro., near the tip ofthe tooth. Unfortunately, the incomp'eze .. ure of thetooth preve zs its f..rther identification.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
61/72
Figure 16.-- TYrannosaurid tooth fragment, KS specimen, siteQY3. Scaie bar 3.s 1 cm. A. Side view carina is to theleft!. B. Base of ragment.
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
62/72
graphic Level and Age.-- This specrmen was recovered:","=.. ear the Timber Lake/Iron Lightnrng Member boundry of
."ox Bills Formation. It is Maastrichtian in age.
CLASS Reptilia
Referred Speczmens.-- SLU No. 1832 fragmentary material,fragment of metacarpal ?!, and larger, thinner fragmentpossibly skull material! collected. from T. 130 N., R. 106
W., Sec. 25, Bowman County, North Dakota.Diagnosis and Description.-- The larger, thin fragment isapproximately 9.9 cm long, 9.5 cm wide, and ranges inthickness from 1.1 cm on the left side Figure 18! to a
thin, knife-like edge on the curved and right hand edgesI'igure 18!. The piece is very porous and is perforated by
several nerve canals which intersect the surf~ca of the boneat approximately 45 degrees. The bone has a curvature whichslightly flattens towards the knife-lake curved edge.
The metacarpal ?! has a maximum hefoht o" 3.3 cm, amaximum width of 1.6 cm which thine to .55 c.-. and a maximum
depth of 1.5 cm Frgure 17!. The piece has been broken andonly approximately one half of the tot.al none rs present.
The numerous fragments of bone rarge in length fromapproximately I cm to approximately 6 cm and range in widthfrom apprcx':..ately I cm to approximately 6 cm. Most of thepieces are rectangular in general sha e a..d - e composed ofcompac , struts 'r ' bone
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
63/72
Figure 17.-- Reptilran metacarpal fragment, SLU No. 1S32,sate ATGSG. Scale bar as 1 cm. A. Sade r ew. B. "Top"iew look ..o =" =-=- culatang surface
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
64/72
Figure 18. Rept'lian Turtle ?!! skull ?! fragment, SLUNo. 1832, site '1050. Scale bar is 1 cr..
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
65/72
Due to the extreme fragmentary nature of theficat on is extremely difficult. The
pcr-"'-'= bone appears to be skull material and themay be rib material. The metacarpal
cesar"les '.-. -' seen in Protostega sp.. However,cation is impossible without a definite
of the thin bone's identity.Level and Age. The material was collected-" oi' c
:amber Lake Member of the Fox Hills Formation
31 feet above the Pierre Shale boundry. It isprcximatelyas =.'chi an in Age
CLASS Reptilia
Referred Specimen.-- NDGS specimen, metacarpal collected by
John Hoganson approximately one mile north of s'te A1050.Diagnosis and Description.-- The metacarpal is 3 cm tall,has a maximum wrdth of 1.4 cm, and has a maximum thicknessof 1.3 cm Figure 19!. The shaft of the bone 's fairlysmooth and the articulatrng surfaces are rein' ively flat.D 'scussion. -- This bone is too small to oe identified by
self.Based entirely on conjecture, o e can state that it.:.ost likely belongs to a mosasaur or turtle.
Szratagraphic Level and Age. -- This bone was collected intie 'amber Lake Member of the Fox Hills For=.,ation. It isMaas richt.=."
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
66/72
P' gure 9.-- 5 11'a . metacarpal, NDGS pecimen, recoveredapprox -... el: mile : om sate A1050. Scale bar is 1 cm.A. Sr e ; . B. ": p" v ew lookino o. to articulatingsurfac
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
67/72
SUMMARY
of r.-e fossils represent either a stratrgraphic orrange extensron. The presence of Mosasaurus
and the Plloplatecarpus provide evidence of a lrnkbetween the Maastrichitian deposits of New Jersey and theNaastrichtian deposits of North Dakota. However, the exactspecies of thePlfoplatecarpus is unknown and it mayrepresent a stratigraphic and geographic range extensionzrom the Campanran of South Dakota. The mosasaur vertebrae,
even though they can not be effectively identified, providefurther evidence to the presence of mosasaurs in the FoxHills Formatron of North Dakota. The discovery of theBasi lemys sp. scute provides a geographic link to theBasilemys sp. seen in the Fox Hills of South Dakota andthose seen rn the JudithRiver beds of Montana and Canada.
The presence of the tyrannosaur tooth fragment in the FoxHills represents a stratigraphic range extension from theoverlaying Hell Creek Formation. The unidentified reptilianfossil remains nrovide material support to the reptilianpresence of the Fox Hills but, until they are identified,wrll not provrde anv clues to any range or geographic rangeextens'ons.
The fossils, when vzewed individually, provide evidence
of stratrgraphrc and geographic range extensrons. However,when tl ev a e vrewed as a whole we see a combinatron ofterresrrial --., ma ine faunas. This faunal evidence further
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
68/72
60
the deltaic environmental interpretation of the Fox:-.'lls sediments
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
69/72
REFERENCES
1890. On the characters and Systematic
positron of the large sea lizards, Mosasauridae.e, 16:2orden L. Jr. and Sheldon, Mary Amy. 1986.
esc zptzon of a very Young Mosasaur from GreensCounty, Alabama. Journal of the Alabama Academy ofScience, 57 !:76-82.
Bcuchard, T. R. 1990. The Lowez Veztebrates of the FoxHills Formation in Meade County, South Dakota. SouthDakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, S.D.82p.
Bunker, B. J., Witzke, B. J., Watney, W. L., and Ludvigson,G. A. 1988. Phaneroroic History of tie CentalMidcontinent, United States, In: Sloss, L. L., ed.The Geology of North America, Sedimentary Cover NorthAmerican Craton: U.S. The Geological Society ofAmerica, 0-2:243-260.
Sauamata, Mosasauridae! from the Sharon Springs Membezof the Pzerre Fo nation Campanian of Wyoming [abstrl.Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, p. 20A.
Camp, C.L. 1962. Cal fornza Mosasaurs. Be keley:.vers of Cal fornza Press, 66p
Carper ter, S. :., Er ckson J. M., Lohmann, K. C., and Owenrageneszs of Fossilzfero s Concretzons
61
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
70/72
6 7
" e" Cretaceous Fox Hzlls Formation, North
ournal of Sedimentary Petrology, 58 !:706-
1864. On the Characters of the Higher Groups of. = =dinge of the Academy of Natural Science of
'adelphia: 224-231,1868. On Some Cretaceous Reptilia. Proceedings
of the Academy of Natural Science of Philadelphia: 233
-282C- er, G. C. F. 1808. Sur le grand animal fossile des
arriere de Maastricht. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris Ann.12:185-176 not seen!.
Dorf, Erling and Fox, S. K. 1957. Czetaceous and Cenozoicof the New Jezsey Coastal Plain, ln: Dorf, Erling,
ed. Guidebook for Field Trips, Atlantic City Meeting,1957. The Geological Society of Ame ' ca: 1-27.
Erickson, J. M. 1992. Subsurface Saran graphy,Lithofacies, and Paleoenvironments o he Fox HillsFormation Maastrichtian: Late Cretaceous! Adjacent tothe Type Area, North Dakota and So: akota Toward aMore Holistic View. North Dakota Ceolocical SurveyMiscellaneous Series, 76:199-241.
Gregczy, J. ~ . '951. Convergent evolution the jaws ofMHar =-;, . " '.. Not ce of the discovery -" the remains of
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
71/72
oryzergent evolution the,'aws ofHearers.rzs - d the mosasaurs. Evolution, 5 !:345-354
1534. Notrce of the discovery of the remains o
yosaurus in Mzssouri, N,A. Tran. Amer.Soc., 4:405-409908. The Fossil Turtles of North America.
Carnegie Institution, washington D.C.: 568 p., 113 pl.ta..-Solrar, T. 1991. Locomotion in mosasaurs: inDinosaur Studies; commemorating the 150th anniversary
of Richard Owen's Dinosauria. Modern Geology, 16 -2!:21991. Mosasaurs from the UpperCretaceous of. Niger. Palaeontology, 34 !:653-6 0.
Mantell, G. A. 1829. A Tabular Arrancement of the OrganicRemains of tne County of Sussex. Geological Society
of London Transactrons, 2 !:201-216.Mulder, E.N.A. a. d Theu...'ss n B. 1986. Hermann Schlegel's
znvestigation of the M-astricht .==- saurs. Archives ofNatura His orv, ".: I', ~ -6
Olson, Everett. 1971. ,enter =-: Paleoz ol.ocy. New York:
J. H. -.== Car cll. =. .. .=.. R. pt'lia, IIDOstromN, =-.-.:=- =-:=-:.', as i-, eds. TheFazrbr
Pa'eon = y. D-'den, ;3:tchinson ands
.= pti es rcm he Ser cn an U. Cret. !Perse
-
8/7/2019 Getman, Myron. 1994. Occurances of Mosasaur Remains from the Fox Hills Formation (Maastrichtian: Late Cretace
72/72
6'
H=sco y, 86:1-19,1967. Systematics and Morphology of
Amerrcan Mosasaurs Reptilia, Saurial. New Haven;Peabody Museum of Natural Hrstory Bulletin 23.
1994. Ui publrshed personal communication.Sevon, W.D. 1958. A Niobrara Mosasaur of South Dakota.
South Dakota Academy of Science Proceedings,1957,36:144-146.
Sheldon, M. A. 1993. Ontogenetic Study of Selected
Mosasaurs of North America, Masters Thesrs. Universityof Texas at Austin, Austin. 183 p.
Smith, F. G. W. 1956. Monsters of the Ancient Seas. SeaFrontiers, International Oceanographic Foundation,MiVaughn, P. P. and Dawson, M. R. 1956. On the Occurrence ofCalcified Tympanic Membranes in the MosasaurPiatecarpus. Transactions of the Kansas Academy otScience, 59 li382-384.
Williston,S.W.1902. Notes on some new or lrttle knownextinct reptiles. Kansas Universrty Science Bulletin,I:247-254.
1904. The Relationships and Habrts of theM J l f G l g 12 l! 43 51