GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

36
GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective

Transcript of GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

Page 1: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

GEOPOLITICS

International relations from a geographical perspective

Page 2: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

State a state is an independent country (though

the term indicates a part of a country in common speech)

an independent country is afforded sovereignty by international laws, agreements, and precedents

internationally recognized boundaries states supply public goods (like roads and

education), regulate economic relations, seek legitimacy in the eyes of citizens and others, and direct relations with other states

Page 3: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

The power of the state resides in state authorities

"L'état, c'est moi!" (I am the State!) Louis XIV

There is only one way to construct such a Common Power as may be able to defend people from the invasion of foreigners and interpersonal conflict—one way to ensure that industriousness and resources are sufficient for a contented life. That is to confer all their power and strength upon one Man or Assembly of men that reduces many wills to one will; people must appoint one man or an Assembly of men to bear their Person. Every one must then acknowledge himself to be the source of the acts of the chosen leader who acts in support of the common peace and safety, and everyone must submit his or her will to the will of the leader and his or her judgment to the judgment of the leader.

Thomas Hobbes Leviathan 1651 (paraphrase by P. Adams)

Page 4: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

nation a nation is a group of people with a claim to a

shared past, common culture, and collective destiny

some nations are virtually coextensive with states, forming nation-states (e.g. Japan, Sweden, Mongolia)

some nations are struggling for autonomy/sovereignty and may lie entirely within a state (Quebec's situation in Canada) or across state borders (Kurdistan's situation in Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Syria region)

Nationalism the passionate defense of national interests, either in a

nation-state framework (where it is also called patriotism) or outside of such framework (where it is called by various names such as treason and terrorism, and usually suppressed violently)

Page 5: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

Enclave a "hole" in a political territory created

by a sovereign or semi-sovereign entity (like a state, tribal homeland, or Indian reservation) or by a fragment of a foreign country (like the U.S. enclave at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba)

a district, province, region, town, etc. in a state that aligns itself politically with a foreign state, usually an adjacent one

Page 6: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

EnclavesLesotho and The Gambia

Page 7: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

Exclave

a bit of a state that is separated from the rest of the state, such as Alaska (a U.S. exclave) and Kaliningrad (a Russian exclave bordering Lithuania and Poland on the Baltic Sea)

Page 8: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

Exclaves

Kaliningrad

Exclave of Russia

Page 9: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

Can you spot any potential problems here?

Hint: discontinuities in formal culture regions often cause political problems

Page 10: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

Enclave + Exclave = Trouble

Two small countries in the Caucasus Mutually hostile despite 10 year ceasefire Armenia has an ethnically Armenian (Indo-

European) Christian population Azerbaijan has a Turkic Muslim population

Nagorno-Karabagh region of Azerbaijan is an enclave, populated by Armenians

Currently held by Armenian military Turkey is imposing an economic blockade

on Armenia to try to force it to give up N-K A bit of history:

1915-1923 Turkey committed genocide in Armenia—killed 1.5 million Armenians, tried to conquer Armenian territory

Turkey denies any wrongdoing Problems between Armenia & Azerbaijan

began under Stalin when Nagorno-Karabagh was included in the Baku Province (which essentially had the borders of Azerbaijan)

What general perspective can explain each country’s position?

Page 11: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

What’s bigger than a state?

Empire Multi-state & multiethnic political

entity Created & sustained by force

Empires Roman Empire Holy Roman Empire

Thirty Years War was a religious war in Europe

Both ended with the Peace of Westphalia (1648)

Westphalian system: state is the highest entity (not religious affiliation); applied to Europe after this point, and to world in 1960s, ’70s and ‘80s

Ottoman Empire Outside Westphalian system until after

WWI British Empire

Colonized areas outside Europe then granted independence to most of these between late 1700s and mid 20th c.

Imperialism/colonialism European & American

dominance of poor countries

Military & political control Economic exploitation

Hegemonic Domain Cultural and economic

dominance without overt use of force

Current US-dominated world system

Cold-war marked US rise to position of global power

Supranational Organizations and International Alliances

EU NAFTA CIS Etc.

Page 12: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

Supranational political organizations

Organizations of states based on any form of cooperation or coordination some are the vestiges of collapsed empires (CIS) Some are primarily military (NATO) Some are primarily economic (OPEC) Some are technological (European Space Agency)

All imply some compromise of sovereignty, except possibly for the U.S., which is able to “participate” without giving up sovereignty

Page 13: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

Regional Organizations Worldwide

Source: Wikipedia

Page 14: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

Supranational Entities in Eurasia

Page 15: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

GROWTH OF THE EU

Page 16: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

GROWTH OF THE EU

Page 17: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

CORE

D

O

M

A

I N

ANTICIPATED

EXPANSION

?

?

Page 18: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

CONFIRMATION OF CORE-DOMAIN MODEL

Page 19: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

Geopolitics

Page 20: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

Terms to enhance discussion of geopolitical discourses

Geopolitical codes Particular constructions of “us” and “them”

E.g. Evil Empire, hyperpower, failed state, a people in exile, God’s chosen people, members of a protectorate, etc.

Particular constructions of space, place, and time E.g. manifest destiny, mission civilisatrice, “

a land without people for a people without land,” the march of progress, lebensraum, etc.

Narrative appeals The moral of a geopolitical tale Tragic, comic, romantic or ironic in nature

E.g. “once again we’ve been ripped off” (tragic), “once again we’ve been obligated to save the world” (romantic), “once again our ties to [insert state name] have benefited us,” etc.

All such appeals are constructions rather than facts Omissions

Very little can be said in a news article What facts or conditions were left out of the story and how might

they have interfered with the geopolitical codes and narrative appeals in the story?

Page 21: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

The driving question Q. What is geography good for? A. Defense and conquest.

This, at least, is the oldest and most common answer to the question!

geography was important to the Roman Empire, the Chinese Dynasties, the British Empire, & the expanding U.S. (19th c.)

“Realist” approach to foreign policy based on assumption that world is governed by force

rather than cooperation Appropriate foreign policies either subdue other

countries or contain them Alternative, “Kantian” approach is based on

assumption that power politics do not provide lasting solutions and states must cooperate

Page 22: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

Uses of geographical info. settlement (planting colonists and

resisting "the natives") contesting claims of other

potential colonizers waging war (against "natives" and

other colonizers) justifying the struggle for regional

or global domination

Page 23: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

H. Mackinder’s "heartland" theory (1904)

Page 24: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

cold war “containment”

Page 25: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

Consider these questions: What is the capital of Tanzania? What is the major export of Sri Lanka? On what battlefield did the British win

control of Canada? Q. What do these questions have in

common? A. They are questions that lend

themselves to geography-as-statecraft

Page 26: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

Consider these questions: Which of the following is produced

by asking questions like these? understanding of foreign places understanding of foreign people and

cultures understanding of how historical

changes affect people understanding of globalization none of the above

Page 27: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

Geographers still find employment working for various branches of the military

However, now many are struggling to redefine geopolitics through specializations such as: critical geopolitics political ecology cultural ecology conflict and peace studies

Page 28: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

Why don’t “they” like us?

Page 29: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

Why don’t they like us?

1. US Power2. US Influence3. Different values4. Personal experiences5. History6. Pollution7. Unilateralism

Page 30: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

US Power The U.S. is the richest, most powerful

country in the world when people are unhappy they point

the finger at us first this is particularly easy when:

The U.S. backs oppressive governments Someone steps on a landmine left by U.S.

forces or is accidentally killed by Americans Someone loses a factory job because of

U.S. trade policies

Page 31: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

US Influence Not everyone wants to live the

American dream The U.S. influences life in other

countries in ways that are disruptive of local values and traditional ways of life

Should we expect people to appreciate their losses as well as their gains?

Page 32: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

History The U.S. is the only country in the world that has used

nuclear weapons to kill people Hiroshima & Nagasaki, 1945, 100,000 fatalities The US has used weapons of mass destruction on civilian

populations Other casualties since WWII

400,000 children died in Iraq as a result of the first Gulf War (UN estimate)

about 3,767 civilians in Afghanistan (769 more than the final Sept. 11 body count, and proportionately a much higher segment of the population)

Millions of civilians killed or deprived of their rights in developing countries with US knowledge and consent

1,000,000 died in a brutal war in Angola in which we supported Jonas Savimbi

200,000 civilians were killed in East Timor (Indonesia) after Ford & Kissinger gave Suharto the OK

Tens of thousands of civilians killed in Guatemalan civil war, most by the US-backed Rios Montt government

Page 33: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

History The U.S. has supported various dictatorial regimes in other

countries since WWII (collectively responsible for suppressing political dissent, killing millions of civilians, and running corrupt regimes)

"Baby Doc" Duvalier Marcos Somoza Pinochet Suharto Hussein Musharaf

US continued to maintain friendly relations with Argentina during its "dirty war" although the Argentine government was using torture and "disappearances" to suppress political dissent

Abu Graib abuses

Unfortunately there is plenty of evidence to string together a solid anti-American case if one is so inclined!

Page 34: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

US Unilateralism The U.S. (Republican Congress and Bush administration)

currently opposes virtually all global agreements and treaties: treaty on small arms trade (UN estimates there have been about

4,000,000 small arms casualties since 1990) [allies: Latin American and African countries] [domestic pressure from NRA, $10 billion arms export industry]

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women [domestic pressure Population Research Institute (pro-life)] [debate blocked by Sen. Jesse Helms] [already ratified by 168 countries]

Kyoto protocol on global warming [70 countries have ratified, including all EU countries] [domestic pressure from Competitive Enterprise Institute and other pro-business lobbies]

Anti-ballistic missile treaty UN Convention on the Rights of the Child [allies: the Vatican, Iran, Iraq,

other Islamic countries] [domestic pressure Sen. Jesse Helms, Christian Coalition, Family Research Council, Focus on the Family, the John Birch Society, and others]

Treaty to ban landmines Rome Treaty creating International Criminal Court US finally gave in

but displayed strong discomfort, then worked behind the scenes to win exemptions country by country

U.S. policy of a "preemptive strike" (the privilege to prevent a country from attacking by attacking it first) is clearly not meant as a policy for any other country to follow; it is a special right reserved only for the U.S.

Page 35: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

Pollution

1. Pollution

Page 36: GEOPOLITICS International relations from a geographical perspective.

Summary Nations and states are different things, and often coexist

uneasily Political tension is common around an enclave or

exclave, particularly if the population is culturally similar to the majority in a neighboring state

Geopolitics is the study of power relations between states for nationalistic (patriotic) or scholarly purposes (the latter being critical of the former)

Geopolitics now involves the effort to understand diverse elements of other cultures as these shape and interact with political elements at the nation and state level

Transnational political entities are growing in number and importance

The reasons “they” don’t like us are varied and complex, not simply a matter of “them” being evil!