Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Software...

٧٣

Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Engineering Sciences Series Vol. (30) No. (1) 2008

2007

��

project management maturity

Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Softwarehttp://www.foxitsoftware.com For evaluation only.

٧٤

Tishreen University Journal for Research and Scientific Studies - Engineering Sciences Series Vol. (30) No. (1) 2008

Methodology of Project Management Assessment and the Financial Effects of Its Practices

Dr. Bassam Hasan * Dr. Jamal Omran**

Rana Maya***

(Received 19 / 9 / 2007. Accepted 17/12/2007)

� ABSTRACT �

A lot of construction projects fail to complete their processes according plans,

leading to financial and technical problems. The paper tries to study the extent to which the application of best management practices will have a quantitative measurable effect on project success.

We have developed a model (trio assessment methodology) to assess project management maturity for a sample of 18 Syrian projects in Lattakia and Damascus. Results varied with the max was 3 of 5 and a minimum was 1.1.

We then applied regression analysis to find the correlation between project management maturity and project performance, represented by cost and duration deviation coefficient. The diagrams showed that there was a strong relation between them.

The research introduces a practical tool that project mangers can use to identify the organization ability in order to improve project management and the benefits.

Key Words: Project management maturity, Regression analysis

* * Professor, Department of Construction Engineering and Management, Faculty of Civil

Engineering, Tishreen University, Lattakia, Syria.**Associate Professor, Department of Construction Engineering and Management, civil engineering faculty, Tishreen university, Lattakia, Syria * **Postgraduate Student, Department of Construction Engineering and Management, civil engineering faculty, Tishreen university, Lattakia,Syria


Tishreen University Journal. Eng. Sciences Series

٧٥

؟

فوائد مالیة

$


٧٦



٧٧

[1]

] [2

(IBBS&KWAK 2002)

]3[( pm)2


٧٨

PMBOK ] [4

Project management institute

38

(Kerzner,2001)

international institute for learning (ILL)

] [5

PMI* : www.pmi.org



٧٩

(schiltz 2003)

PM2

]6[

[7]

-

-

-

-


٨٠

-

-

-

-

(OPM3)

(OPM3)

organizational project management

[8]

.

-

-

-

-

-

-



٨١

.

opm3

.

[9][10]

[11][12]

2 pm

[13]


٨٢

)(

dardizedstan

یحسن باستمرار

غیر مبني

مخطط

نموذجي

مقاس

2

3

4

5

1



٨٣


٨٤

pm2



٨٥

[6]

-

-

-

-


٨٦

)(



٨٧

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

مستوى النضوج

123456789101112131415161718

عدد المشاریع

نضوج إدارة المشاریع

Series2

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


مستوى نضوج إدارة مشاریع البناء الخدمیة

Series1


٨٨

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8


مستوى نضوج إدارة المشاریع الطرقیة والبنى التحتیة

Series1

1 1.8 2.22 2.94 2 1.8 1.64 2.13 3 2 1.47 1.39 4 1.4 1.96 1.92 5 1.6 2 2.44



٨٩

)

y = -0.644x3 + 4.5665x

2 - 11.144x + 10.792

R2 = 0.4829

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

مستوى نضوج اإلدارة لعینة المشاریع المدروسة

فةكل

الف

راح ان

ملعا

م

Series1

Poly. (Series1)

6 1.55 2.32 1.56 7 1.9 1.2 1.82 8 1.1 3.33 4.76 9 2.6 1.4 1.09

10 3 1.08 1.19 11 1.6 1.82 1.14 12 1.53 1.82 2.27 13 1.95 2.85 1.33 14 1.86 1.54 1.59 15 1.94 1.05 2.13 16 1.74 1.54 2.7 17 2.2 1.35 1.2 18 1.66 2.86 3.7


٩٠

y = -0.9874x3 + 7.1886x2 - 17.816x + 16.449

R2 = 0.5075

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

مستوى نضوج اإلدارة للمشاریع

نزم

الف

رانح

ل اام

مع

Series1

Poly. (Series1)

y = -0.0124x3 + 0.7268x2 - 3.9265x + 6.6431

R2 = 0.7051

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

مستوى نضوج اإلدارة للمشاریع الخدمیة

ــة لفلكف ا

راحــ

انــل

اممع

Series1

Poly. (Series1)



٩١

y = -0.6274x3 + 4.8896x2 - 13.237x + 13.774

R2 = 0.5492

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

مستوى نضوج اإلدارة للمشاریع الخدمیة

ن زم

��ال��ف

را��ح��

انل��م��عام

Series1

Poly. (Series1)

r2 = 0.483 r2= 0.508

r2 = 0.7051 r2= 0.549


٩٢

[1] COOKE, D.; TERENCE, J.; SCHICHTER, f. ; BREDLITTET C.: beyond the BMBOK guide.proceedings of the 32 and annual project management institute seminars and symposium , Nashville, 2001 .

[2]CMMI PRODUCT TEAM (2002) : capability maturity model integration .version 1.1, camegie mellon software engineering institute , pitrusburg ,pa ,2002

[3] IBBS,W.;KWAK.Y. assessing project management maturity. journal of management in engineering ,Vol.18,No.3,julay 2002

[4 ] PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE. A guide to the project management body of knowledge .2000 edition , Newtown square, Project management institute,2000,

[5] KERZNER,H. using the project management maturity model :strategic planning for project management. second edition , John Wiley & Sons ,USA, 2005,334.

[6]SCHILTZ ,S.A practical method for assessing the financial benefits of project management. M.s thesis ,graduate school of business and management, Switzerland , 2003,58 2/2005.

www.pmi-switzerland.ch/knowledge/costofbadpm-schiltz-v11.pdf

[7] GANDI,J.: preliminary assessment of project management practices of public housing authorities. Community and Economic Development Program Occasional



٩٣

M.s thesis, school for planning, design , and construction , Michigan state university, August 2005,87.

[8] PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE. organizational project management maturity model (opm3). knowledge foundation version Newtown square, Project management institute. Pennsylvania USA, 2003 , 179

[9] PAULK,M.C.;WEBER,C.V.,GARCIA;S.M.,CRISSIS,M.B.; BUSH,M. key practices of the capability maturity model .Software engineering Institute ,version1.1,technical report,SEI-93-TR-025, . 1993

[10] Mc CAUELY,M.:Developing a project-driven organization .PM network ,sep 1993 . 26-30

[11]HINKS,J.,AOUAD,G.; COOPER,R.; SHEATH,D.; kAGIOGLO,M.; SEXTON,M.. IT and the design and construction process , a connectional model for co-maturation .the international journal of construction information technology ,Vo.l5,No.1, 1997, 1-25.

[12] DOOLEY,K.;SUBRA,A.; ANDERSON,j.the impact of maturity and best practices in new product development .quality management conference ,Arizona state ,February 1998

[13] PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE . construction extension to a guide to the project management body of knowledge .2000 edition, Newtown square, Project management institute. Pennsylvania USA,2003,162


٩٤


Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Software...

Documents

Transcript of Generated by Foxit PDF Creator © Foxit Software...