General Electric – Risk & Cost of Capital Aspects of a deal Risk & Cost of capital Negotiation...
-
Upload
benjamin-baldwin -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
2
Transcript of General Electric – Risk & Cost of Capital Aspects of a deal Risk & Cost of capital Negotiation...
General Electric – Risk & Cost of Capital
Aspects of a deal
Risk & Cost of capitalN
egot
iation
Strategy
DealStructure
ApproachTarget
TargetIdentifi-cation
ValuationValuation
DueDiligence
Incorporating risk in valuation is key
GE’s approach to risk - two fold
Mitigate
– Hedge transactions…currency, commodities
– Transactions backed by guarantees…corporate
guarantee, LOC, parent guarantee
– Back to back agreements
– Government approvals…country risk
– Deal covenants
– GE Management
Incorporate
– Higher cost of capital
– Adjust cash flows
Why is cost of capital important?
Objective
– Proxy for risk
– Reduces value of investment…faster pay back
– Should mirror cost of obtaining funds and
certainty and timing of recovery
Uses
– Purchase/ building of industrial facility
– Acquisitions/ investments
– Long term contracts
Computation of cost of capital
Cost of capital is -
– WACC or Discount rate
– Base rate usually anchored on US
Base rate adjusted for risk-
– Currency
– Industry
– Expropriation
– Demand
– Regulatory risk
– Environment reg.
Not all risks result in adjustment to cost of capital
Risk and cost of capital
People/ Management
Financial
Environment
No freedom to rationalize people
Trade unions
Cost of severance
Quality of management
Currency exposure
Inflation/ devaluation
Funding
Interest rates
Health and safety issues
Country/ industry environment
exposure
Cost of capital adjusted
Cost of capital adjusted
unless agreement reached
Cash flows adjusted
Cost of capital not adjusted
Usually hedged..cost of
capital not adjusted
Cost of capital adjusted
Cost of capital adjusted
more so if local borrowing
Cost of capital adjusted
Cost of capital & cash flows adjusted
Cost of capital & cash flows adjusted
Risk Examples Treatment
Risk and cost of capital
Country
Project/ investment related risks
Risk Examples Treatment
Political Instability
Regulatory reforms/ policies
Economic instability
Corruption
Supply interruption
Technology
Market risk – sell-side
Barriers to entry
Force Majure
Weak Exit Strategy
Tax exposure
Possibility of Unscheduled events/ delays
Cost of capital adjusted
Cost of capital not adjusted unless risk very high
Cost of capital adjusted
Cost of capital not adjusted
Cost of capital not adjusted
Cost of capital adjusted
Cost of capital adjusted
Cost of capital adjusted
Cost of capital not adjusted
unless exposure very high
Cost of capital adjusted
Cost of capital not adjusted…usually cash flows
Cost of capital not adjusted…unless risk quantifiable
Risk & Cost of Capital – Tools and Internal Process
Due Diligence Process
Objective
– To provide enough information to measure and assess risk in
deals and investment
– Internal and external parties involved - GE Audit Staff, KPMG
Process usually covers the following risks:
– People/ Management
– Project/ investment related risks
– Environment, Health and Safety
End result
– Information on risks…risks usually quantified
– Incorporation of risks and adjustment of cost of capital by Deal
team
– Process more art than science
Due Diligence Process
3
Due DiligenceThe Intensity of Due Diligence Varies by the Legal Stage of the Acquisition/J V Process:
Attempt To Limit Intensity And Resources Until A Clear Deal Exists -- Not Always Possible (e.g., Auction, Tender).
ContractContractSignedSigned
ConfidentialityConfidentialityAgreementAgreement
Letter ofLetter ofIntentIntent
ClosingClosing
Business & LegalDue Diligence(Pre-Signing)
ConfirmingDue Diligence/
Audit(Pre-Closing)
Audit/Deal Hand-Off
(Post-Closing)
PreliminaryDue Diligence
(Pre-LOI)
Valuation
Due Diligence Process
4
Each Due Diligence Plan is unique . . . and the goals vary by stage:
•Thoroughly understand targets current operations, outlook, assets, and liabilities. Both Financial and Strategic
•Identify Deal Killers/Shapers
•Confirm Valuation Assumptions/Synergies
•Probe legal concerns, confirm Disclosure Schedules
•Confirm Feasibility of Integration Plan
•Confirm representations true
•Ensure covenants being followed
•Verify no material adverse change
•Formulate closing net worth estimate
•Link with Integration Team
•Detect Representation Violations
•Prepare closing net worth statement
•Drive Integration
•Not applicable for Public Company deals
•Gain basic knowledge
– Products
– Sales
– Profitability
– Balance Sheet
– Rough Cut of Synergies
PRE-LOI PRE-SIGNING PRE-CLOSING POST-CLOSING
AUDITBUSINESS REVIEW
Each Stage Is Critical . . . If You Skip A Stage,You Miss A Chance To Manage Exposure.
Due Diligence
Due Diligence Process – EHS web-page
Country risks…GE Capital Risk Management
Objective
– To provide enough information to measure and assess country
risk in deals and investment
Process usually covers the following :
– Risk assessment by GE’s economists and risk management
team
– Comments of in-country teams incorporated
– Internal analysis verified with external reports
End result
– Information on country risks…risks usually quantified
– Cost of capital adjusted by Deal team
– Process highly scientific
Country risks: Web page
9 / 1 1 / 0 2
A u g ' 0 2 J u l ' 0 2 J u n ' 0 2 M a y ' 0 2 A u g ' 0 1U n e m p l o y m e n t ( % ) N A N A 2 . 4 2 . 7 2 . 3C o s t o f M o n e y - 3 Y r 9 . 9 5 1 0 . 2 1 0 . 9 0 9 . 4 5 N AC o s t o f M o n e y - 7 Y r 1 1 . 3 5 1 1 . 4 5 1 1 . 7 0 1 0 . 8 0 N A
- J a p a n - - A u s t r a l i a -
I n t e r n a t i o n a l E c o n o m i c I n d i c a t o r sA u g u s t ‘ 0 2
- C a n a d a -
C a p i t a l E x p e n d i t u r e & G D P G r o w t h C a p i t a l E x p e n d i t u r e & G D P G r o w t h
* I n d i c a t e s f o r e c a s t e d n u m b e r .
- M e x i c o -G D P G r o w t h G D P G r o w t h
C a p i t a l E x p e n d i t u r e & G D P G r o w t h C a p i t a l E x p e n d i t u r e & G D P G r o w t h
C a p E x
G D P
1 . 5 %1 . 2 %
0 . 0 %
- 1 . 9 %
- 0 . 9 %
- 2 . 6 %
0 . 0 %0 . 5 %
Q 1 ' 0 1 Q 3 ' 0 1 Q 4 ' 0 1
2 . 4 0 %
- 0 . 8 %
- 1 . 5 %- 2 . 7 %
1 . 1 % 1 . 1 % 1 . 2 % 1 . 0 %
Q 1 ' 0 1 Q 3 ' 0 1 Q 4 ' 0 1 Q 1 ' 0 2
- 1 . 4 %
1 . 4 %
2 . 0 %
1 . 0 %
Q 1 ‘ 0 1 Q 3 ' 0 1 Q 4 ' 0 1 Q 1 ' 0 2- 1 . 5 % - 1 . 6 % - 2 . 0 %
2 . 1 %
Q 3 ' 0 1 Q 4 ' 0 1 Q 1 ' 0 2 Q 2 ' 0 2
K e y =
A u g ' 0 2 J u l ' 0 2 J u n ' 0 2 M a y ' 0 2 A u g ' 0 1U n e m p l o y m e n t ( % ) 7 . 6 7 . 5 7 . 5 7 . 6 7 . 0C o s t o f M o n e y - 3 Y r 4 . 0 5 3 . 9 7 4 . 4 3 4 . 6 3 4 . 6 8C o s t o f M o n e y - 7 Y r 4 . 9 5 5 . 1 5 . 2 8 5 . 3 8 5 . 4 0
A u g ' 0 2 J u l ' 0 2 J u n ' 0 2 M a y ' 0 2 A u g ' 0 1U n e m p l o y m e n t ( % ) 5 . 5 N A 5 . 4 5 . 4 5 . 0C o s t o f M o n e y - 3 Y r 0 . 1 7 0 . 2 1 0 . 2 2 0 . 2 5 0 . 2 5C o s t o f M o n e y - 7 Y r 0 . 6 5 0 . 8 0 . 8 0 0 . 8 8 0 . 9 2
A u g ' 0 2 J u l ' 0 2 J u n ' 0 2 M a y ' 0 2 A u g ' 0 1U n e m p l o y m e n t ( % ) 6 . 2 6 . 2 6 . 3 6 . 3 6 . 8C o s t o f M o n e y - 3 Y r 5 . 9 9 6 . 1 3 6 . 3 6 6 . 4 7 5 . 3 5C o s t o f M o n e y - 7 Y r 6 . 6 8 6 . 8 4 6 . 9 2 6 . 9 5 5 . 8 3
Country risks: Sample analysis
Country risk: GE legal web-page
Financial risks…GE Treasury
Objective
– To provide enough information to measure and assess financial
risk in deals and investment
– Involvement of corporate and business treasury teams
Process usually covers the following :
– Risk assessment by GE’s economists and treasurers
– Internal analysis verified with external reports
– Hedging instruments identified
– Optimal capital structure identified
End result
– Information on currency risks…risks usually hedged
– Cost of capital adjusted by Deal team for funding, local
borrowing
– Process mix of art and science
Currency risks – GE Treasury web-page
Easy way out….
Target Company Information:
M&A News:
Current Borrowing Cost and WACC:
Links to sources of basic information regarding a company
Recent GE acquisitions in the news
GE’s current borrowing cost and WACC used for modeling acquisitions
Companies would centralize information…not to reinvent the wheel
Business case – GE Lighting acquisition of Tungsram
Deal Basics
Facts• Acquirer: GE Lighting
• Tungsram Company, Hungary
• 12 factories, 18K employees
• Low cost but low quality producer
• Annual sales: $300MM
Deal Structure
• Huge country risk
• Cash deal - $ 160MM
• Reduced exposure by limiting investment to 50% + 1 share
• DCRR: 19.1%
• Payback: 8.6 years
Strategic consideration
• Rapid Market share
• Low cost position
• Access to new product lines
• Access to distribution channels
Valuation Assumptions
• 2% growth
• Cost of Capital – 14%
• Reduction in overhead costs..10% workforce reduction
• 20% Hungarian tax
• Material efficiency..10% over 5 years
Cost of capital - adjustments
Overall weighted cost of capital 14%