Fred E. Below, Adam Henninger, and Matias Ruffo Crop Physiology Laboratory, University of Illinois,...
-
date post
15-Jan-2016 -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Fred E. Below, Adam Henninger, and Matias Ruffo Crop Physiology Laboratory, University of Illinois,...
Fred E. Below, Adam Henninger, and Matias Ruffo
Crop Physiology Laboratory, University of Illinois, and Mosaic Fertilizer
Seven Wonders of the Corn Yield World
•Ranks those factors that each year can have a positive (and sometimes negative) impact on corn yield
•Gives each factor an average bushel per acre value
Crucial Prerequisites, but Not Yield Wonders
•Drainage
•Pest/Weed Control
•Proper soil pH & adequate levels of P and K based on soil tests
10Growth Regulators
15Tillage
20Plant
Population
25Previous Crop
50Hybrid
70Nitrogen70+Weather
7
6
5
43
2
1bu/acre
ValueFactorRank
Seven Wonders of the Corn Yield World
260 buTotalGiven key prerequisites
10 4Growth Regulators
15 6Tillage20 8Plant Population
25 10Previous Crop50 19Hybrid 70 26Nitrogen 70+ 27Weather
7
6
5
43
2
1bu/acre %
ValueFactorRank
Seven Wonders of the Corn Yield World
260bu 100%Total =Given key prerequisites
How to Get 300 Bushels?
• Provide better prerequisites, especially mineral nutrients
• Try to optimize each of the seven wonders and their positive interactions
Prerequisites for 300 Bushels?
•Proper soil pH & adequate levels of P and K based on soil tests
•Fertility- Required amounts of nutrients each year, Sulfur & Micronutrients?
10 4Growth Regulators
15 6Tillage20 8Plant Population
25 10Previous Crop50 19Hybrid 70 26Nitrogen 70+ 27Weather
7
6
5
43
2
1bu/acre %
ValueFactorRank
Where are the Positive Interactions?
260bu 100%Total =
0 50 100 150 200 250
120
140
160
180
200
220 Hybrid Pair 1
0 50 100 150 200 250
Refuge
Gra
in y
ield
(b
u/a
cre
)
Fertilizer N rate (lb/acre)
Better N use from Biotechnology Traits?
VT3
Hybrid Pair 2
Champaign, IL 2008
Better N use from Biotechnology Traits
Hybrid NUE Uptake Utilization
kg/kg N % kg/kg N
RW-Bt 25.9* 71* 36.4
Non-RW 17.0 52 33.1
RW-Bt 31.7* 71* 44.6
Non-RW 22.4 56 40.1*different from non-RW counterpart P< 0.05
Greater Nutrient Removal with Grain as a Result of Biotechnology Traits
NutrientNon RW resistant
Root worm
resistantDifference
bushels or lbs/acre removed %
Yield 179 205 15
N 110 126 14
P 17 21 24
K 26 31 19
S 8.9 10.4 17
Zn (oz) 2.2 2.8 27Champaign, IL 2008, average of two hybrid pairs
How to Get 300 Bushels?
• Better prerequisites along with packages of optimized yield wonders.
• Is the value of combined factors greater than their individual impact?
10Growth Regulators
15Tillage
20Plant
Population
25Previous Crop
50Hybrid
70Nitrogen70+Weather
7
6
5
43
2
1bu/acre
ValueFactorRank
Seven Wonders of the Corn Yield World
260 buTotalImproved Fertility Prerequisites
Factors for Standard PracticeFertility No P or K based on soil test
Nitrogen 180 lbs pre-plant as UAN
Genetics RR Hybrid (DKC 61-22) with soil insecticide at planting
Population 32,000 plants/ac final stand in 30 inch rows
Fungicide No Fungicide
Factors in High Tech PackageFertility 100 lbs P2O5 as MESZ
supplies P, S, and Zn
Nitrogen 100 lb extra N as SuperUrea as sidedress to assure available N
Genetics Triple stack (DKC 61-19) with soil insecticide at planting
Population 45,000 plants/ac final standin 30 inch rows
Fungicide Strobilurin at flowering Headline or Quilt-Xcel
DeKalb
Champaign
DixonSprings
Omission Plots 2009DeKalb
•Planted May 31•Hard Frost October 10
Champaign•Planted May 26
Dixon Springs•Planted June 8
All Sites•180 lbs base N as UAN•DKC 61-19 or 61-22•Soybean as previous crop•Conventional tillage
High Tech Package vs Traditional Champaign-2009
High Tech PackagePictures taken at R5 on 9/17/09 by Adam Henninger
Traditional
High Tech Package versus TraditionalChampaign - 2009
For 1/1000 of an acre
High Technology Package Traditional Practice
Location Traditional Practice
High Tech Package
bu acre-1
DeKalb 199 213 14*
Champaign 208 274 66*
Dixon Springs 188 245 57*
Yield Enhancement with High Tech Package
* Significance difference (p<0.10)
Data from 2009
Omit Factor High Tech Package
bu acre-1
All Factors 274
Fertility 256 -18
Nitrogen 250 -24
Genetics 247 -27
Population 260 -14
Fungicide 262 -12
Omit From High Tech - Champaign
LSD (p<0.10) = 12
Traditional High Tech
+/- Factor Yield Yield bu acre-1
None or All 208 274
Fertility 215 + 7 256 -18Nitrogen 224 +16 250 -24Genetics 216 + 8 247 -27
Population 193 -15 260 -14
Fungicide 204 - 4 262 -12
Traditional vs High Tech - Champaign
LSD (p<0.10) = 12
Omit Factor High Tech Package
bu acre-1
All Factors 245
Fertility 239 - 6
Nitrogen 230 -15
Genetics 223 -22
Population 241 - 4
Fungicide 221 -24
Omit From High Tech – Dixon Springs
LSD (p<0.10) = 13
Traditional High Tech
+/- Factor Yield Yield bu acre-1
None or All 188 245
Fertility 188 0 239 - 6Nitrogen 187 - 1 230 -15Genetics 199 +11 223 -22
Population 177 -11 241 - 4
Fungicide 192 + 4 221 -24
Traditional vs High Tech – Dixon Springs
LSD (p<0.10) = 13
Omit Factor High Tech Package
bu acre-1
All Factors 213
Fertility 216 +3
Nitrogen 217 +4
Genetics 210 - 3
Population 201 -12
Fungicide 216 +3
Omit From High Tech - DeKalb
LSD (p<0.10) = 11
Traditional High Tech
+/- Factor Yield Yield bu acre-1
None or All 199 213
Fertility 199 0 216 + 3Nitrogen 200 + 1 217 + 4Genetics 201 + 2 210 - 3
Population 202 + 4 201 -12
Fungicide 197 - 2 216 + 3
Traditional vs High Tech– DeKalb
LSD (p<0.10) = 11
Traditional High Tech
Factor Yield Yield bu acre-1
None or All 198 244
Fertility 200 + 2 237 - 7Nitrogen 204 + 6 233 -11Genetics 205 + 7 227 -17
Population 191 - 7 234 -10
Fungicide 198 0 234 -10
Omission Plot – Average Three Sites
LSD (p<0.10) = 7 Data from DeKalb, Champaign and Dixon Springs 2009
Twin-Row Demonstration-2009Fertility At Planting (mg/planted plant)
N 225P2O5 595K2O 212S 50Zn 5
Population 35, 45, 55 x 1000 plants/acall in 7.5” centered twin rows
Fungicide Strobilurin at flowering with and without Headline
DKC 64-24, 180 lbs N/acre pre-plant as UAN, mulch tillage, planted May 22
Plant Population and Fungicide Application in Twin Rows
Plant Population Fungicide
Planted Final Without Withplants/acre x 1000 Bu/acre
35 29 229 247*
45 37 236 253*
55 45 265 278*
Champaign, IL 2009
* Significance difference between fungicide treatment (p<0.10)
Conclusions• Big yield gains are possible
from crop management that provides better Fertility along with packages of optimized Yield Wonders
• The yield value of an individual factor is small compared to the combined value of all factors